Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- You ever think the pornstars are faking orgasms, the female ones? Join this site, no faking here!
- They have a ton of content on this site, upwards of 400 scenes in full
- Pretty nice pictures, 1200+ high end in zips
- Lots of well known pornstars, check out Jenaveve Jolie's set, never seen her orgasm like that with a man
- Download speeds are right at average for me
- Join a second kink.com site for 30% off
- Videos are 640 on high end, though some older ones aren't that high
Cons:
- Could be a little TOO much for some. Some of the action gets rather messy, Jenaveve comes to mind again as she drips white cream everywhere. Worked for me, but might not for some!
- Videos are in sections, which is frustrating to say the least.
- Can become repetitive as do all fetish sites
- Video quality could be improved just a little, moreso on the bitrate than resolution, only 700k bitrate on the best quality videos.
Bottom Line:
I found myself chuckling at times on this site. Just imagine, coming home and finding your wife or girlfriend in your toolbox, borrowing your drill!
Most of these women are pornstars, and I have to say that most look like they are having the time of their life with these machines. This is very real, the orgasms are gooey and messy, the screaming makes you turn your speakers down and the constant clonk-clonk of the machines become part of your sexual vocabulary.
Quality is good enough, nothing great, but 640 to me is good enough, I just wish they would speed the bitrate up. My PC is running a 512MB Video Card with 3GB of RAM, and these videos almost stutter, because of the low bitrate. The pictures are nice, but how many really collect pictures of a woman shoving a dildo-laced drill in each of their orifices?
Still, very entertaining site, one of my new favorites. Member comments are hilarious, including one that said the machine used was cloned from his DNA!
I'm not into those boob suction devices, makes me think too much of milking a cow. What you will get the most of from joining this site is watching these women have amazing orgasms. You can't help but enjoy the writhing, grinding, hip-swinging, nearly violent orgasms. Then again, we men realize, we can't make a woman do that!
A definite recommendation, and a add-on membership to Ultimate Surrender only costs $20 more, plus there is no DL limit, like it used to be, so join and enjoy something different!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Generic type network that has its strengths, including several once solo sites that are no longer updating, including Brooke Skye.
- More content than you go through in a month, name the niche, they have it, Tranny, Pregnant, Gangbang, Lesbian, Solo, and so on.
- Navigation is good enough for this much content, things could get very confusing though if they're not careful.
- Average DL speed
- Some of these sites are 100% exclusive
- Says 106 sites and over 4,000 DVDs, see cons
- For everything you get the $30 price is not too bad, though I can't see going back.
- Quality on some sites goes up to HD level, but there is no "standard" size across all of the sites, so it can be hit or miss.
Cons:
- You're going to get the old network trick of advertising 106 sites and 4000 DVDs, when in reality, many of the DVDs are the content that fills the 106 sites.
- Some sites have no photos, others like Brooke Skye have lots of photos, in zips too.
- Your guess is as good as mine if they really are updating. The nature of the network being mostly of ripped DVDs, makes it impossible to know what is new and what isn't.
Bottom Line:
I think this is a very good idea. If you ever joined the Mayor Network, a network of Canadian solo models, they are all here. All of their content from their official sites. These include Brooke Skye, Kat Young, Samantha Gauge, Casey Hays, Lucy Summers, Faith Belle and Shelby Belle. From what I've heard, all of them have stopped modeling, so trying to sell their solo sites as active was no longer working since content was being recycled.
For me, Brooke's content is worth looking into this network. She was one of the most genuine, girl next door models I've seen. She answered reportedly 500-1000 emails per month when her site was at its peak, she would wear things that members wanted to see her in, masturbate where members wanted her to masturbate. She has one of porn's most real smiles, freckles, nice athletic body too. My favorite clip was requested by a member, masturbation in public at night. Brooke is sitting along a beach with people walking behind her on a sidewalk. She laughs and blushes, "I'm so going to orgasm at the wrong time".
The others from Mayor's were hit or miss, at least one was non-nude. You get a small Gaya Patal site if you like her. You also get three of those early 2000s major tease style models. Sweet Dominique, Sweet Juliet and Teen Jasmin, throw in solo model Lil' Sin and Teen Sabrina.
Those sites to my knowledge are 100% exclusive. Some of those go up to HD quality, most of those have zips for their photos and are unaltered since their days as standalone sites.
The rest of the network is mostly niche DVD clips listed as sites. I would say this content at best is 15% exclusive. Most of it is DVD ripped quality, 640 high end, but no photos.
The best way to look at the network is this way. You're getting one pretty popular and highly rated network that was running strong up until 2008 that was of solo Canadian models. You get 5 sites of solo models that were near the top of porn's "innocent" phase in the early 2000s and you get a cookie cutter DVD site with 4,000+ DVDs. Sweet Dominique was the first I ever joined and I vaguely remember a banner on her site back in 2002 claiming, "The internet's most downloaded teen".
Overall, I think the network could have its audience. The Mayor Network was $25 and very popular with members, even here at PU. Those innocent models from the early 2000s are worth re-visiting again. And though the DVDs are non-exclusive, that goes into the old adage of "It is new to me if I haven't seen it". You're sure to find something in those that interests you.
The varying quality hurts a bit, lack of photos on some sites hurt, lack of zips on some of the ones with photos hurt. I think hit or miss is the best way to describe the network. I will say that I won't be back, at best it is a one month join to scour the exclusive sites, none of those exclusive sites are updating though.
My recommendation is if you like the models in the exclusive sites, try it out, if not, don't fool with it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network of sites that are making you believe they are leaked/revenge photos and videos, partnered or owned by Reality Kings.
- To my surprise, there's a lot of content here and it's all in good quality.
- There are 7 sites included and all feature younger/college-aged models in most of our college fantasy scenarios.
- Navigation is pretty good. You can jump from one site to another and despite this being "leaked" content, the models are all named and can be found easily.
- Download speeds are sporadic for me, but the lowest I've seen was in the average range for my connection.
- Dare Dorm is here, could have sworn that used to be on Bang Bros, but maybe I'm confusing it with another site and it's downloadable. I do remember at one time the Dare Dorm content was only available as stream.
Cons:
- Well, I thought there was a chance this site has a lot of amateur content on it and some of it might be, but you won't get that feeling when watching the scenes.
- Typical join these days, seems there's multiple areas you do not want to click unless you want to be charged for add-ons. I used a prepaid Visa on it.
- Another typical one, the "network" is broken into different categories with each "site" having its own niche. Updates are sporadic between the sites.
Bottom Line:
If any site ever needed to just drop the network branding and become a standalone site, this is it. I've been a member of Reality Kings for years and have seen the advertisements for this network. I thought I would try it out as something a little different than what I'm used to, but really, it's not any different than what we are all used to.
Reality Kings and any site associated with them, also can say this for Bang Bros, produces some of the best porn for those who like a blend of races in their model list. This network is no different. There's some very good content here, but outside of Dare Dorm, you're not going to find anything that unique or different here than you would from say Reality Kings or Bang Bros.
It's kind of a shame really. I'm not near as up to date on the newer models so I really can't say what percentage of these girls are amateurs. Having said that, I really like the content. I didn't come into this network thinking I would be that disappointed since I knew of the affiliation with Reality Kings.
Here's what you're getting:
GF Leaks - This isn't a site, but is the network hub where you can scan through all the newest updates all the way back to the oldest updates. Black GFs - 297 scenes, but hasn't updated since July, 2017. Crazy Asian GFs - 54 scenes, but hasn't updated since July, 2017. Crazy College GFs - 47 scenes, but hasn't updated since May, 2017. Dare Dorm - 172 scenes, updates once per month. GF Revenge - 483 scenes, updates once per week. Horny Birds - 16 scenes, but hasn't updated since August, 2012.
As you can see, there's really only two sites that are actively updating and they're not updating that often. Going by the GF Leaks page they're averaging about 5-6 updates per month across the network.
This is the thing though, if you're into this content, the older content especially brings in some uniqueness to it. The Dare Dorm content is fairly unique since it's usually more like an orgy and often times it's one guy with four or more women. I think it saves the network as a whole since I've always liked this content.
GF Revenge is just normal porn with the premise thrown in that it's a woman getting revenge on her ex or current boyfriend by recording her cheating on him. It's not bad, but I would call it just average. The other not updating sites are similar to GF Revenge. Maybe they have just started putting everything on GF Revenge?
A mention here for Horny Birds since this content, like Dare Dorm, is fairly unique. There's hardly no content on it, but it's a blend of CFNM, Dare Dorm and the two big "party" sites on other networks. I always thought this content had a lot of potential, but that's usually how it goes. It's still worth grabbing the scenes from it.
There's another site on, I think, Mofos, that does a lot of things that this network does like having the pictures include the woman taking selfies in the mirror. At one time, that type of content appealed to me a lot more than now, so if you're into that, that's another plus for this network.
I think the Dare Dorm and Horny Birds content is as good as you're going to find in this day and age of porn. I think if you're coming into a membership here with the thoughts that you're going to get a bunch of content of real amateurs, you'll be disappointed. If you like CFNM content, it's a nearly-extinct niche, you will like Dare Dorm and Horny Birds. It's almost like I'm doing a balancing act here. I think the good outweighs the bad, but with the low update rate, I probably won't join it again maybe ever, but I don't regret joining it.
***Notice here, the oldest content very much looks like real amateur content that we've all seen plastered all over the internet for years, so if you've seen an older looking porn clip and wondered where it's at, there's a chance it's here. The one I noticed most was "Hugging Sidewalk" I've seen the picture for over a decade. It has a blonde covering her eyes like she's embarrassed and another woman drunk and laying on a sidewalk with her legs spread open. Here's the catch, they have 4 photos from that "scene" and no video.
Everything is here for a good overall site. I just wish it wasn't advertised as amateur. I think if you like Reality Kings and their style of shooting, style of models, you will like this network for one month. You're going to get some fairly unique content that I'm guessing is mostly, if not fully, exclusive and everything on the site works well.
Another note: They use probiller and I've just had too many bad and/or frustrating experiences with them to use anything except a prepaid Visa. I will say here that a lot of sites won't let me use a prepaid Visa, but it looks like the ones that use probiller do allow it.
Good site overall and especially if Dare Dorm and Horny Birds appeals to your taste in porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Gigi Spice's solo site, comes with access to 8 other sites, including 6 exclusive solo girl sites, one non-exclusive site and the best of the bonus sites La Zona Modelos.
- Gigi's content's quality is a bit mixed, the photos max out at 1200 long end though you can get some of the same sets on Pacino's Adventures in 1600 long end quality. All sets are zipped.
- Videos all have top quality of 1280x720 with 6000+ bitrates. Also have lesser quality smaller video files available.
- Nice mixture on Gigi's content of solo, boy/girl hardcore and girl/girl
- Navigation is simple, click photo or videos and the page opens with thumbs to each set.
- Download speed is a little faster than Pacino's Adventures, reaching roughly 95% of my max DL speed.
- All content on Gigi's site is exclusive to Pacino's network.
- She's about as playful and cute as I've seen from a Latina in porn, speaks English, but usually speaks seductively in Spanish. Great video model.
Cons:
- First problem, part of these videos and picture sets are also available on Pacino's Adventures. Not just a few, but more like 33% of them. Seeing that I joined both this site and Pacino's Adventures at $30 each, it needs to be mentioned.
- As Pink Panther noted, Gigi is not the best photo model, she is great when in action and moving around, but some of her actions just don't translate well in photos like licking her lips in 5 straight shots. Probably is as much the photographer's fault since she seems very open to anything.
- Not for sure if it is really updating. The newest content is also available on Pacino's Adventures so they may just be bringing content from that site to here as new.
Bottom Line:
I want to note that I removed 5 points off the Pacino's Adventures score since one of the major draws for me was Gigi's content and I now find out it is shared with this site. I'm sure it was done to bloat the numbers of this site.
Next problem, though I didn't list it in cons, the videos, not all, but some, are parts. I didn't list in cons since these are very long videos with very high quality. Even in parts, one has 3 parts and each part is 15 minutes at 700 MB for 1 part. So as a whole it would be 45 minutes at 2.1 GB. It does reduce the number of full scenes to, estimating, 60.
The good parts, Gigi is very cute and playful. This really shows in her videos. She is dancing in one before she even realizes she is on the camera, she laughs a lot, smiles, good eye contact with the camera and then there is the dirty talk. She has the nice, sultry Spanish accent and attitude for it as well. Think of a much less annoying Rosie Perez. She is convincing that she really is getting off. There is some squirting in her videos that looks to be of the real variety. More spurt than steady stream. She giggles when she squirts as well. Some seem to even catch her off guard. She'll kind of look at the floor in front of her to make sure she squirted and smile.
The girl/girl content is good as well. She has one with another of Pacino's models where both are masturbating together. She looks to accidentally pee trying to push a squirting orgasm out and just starts cracking up. The look is one that says, "Oh well, already started peeing, might as well finish".
Her boy/girl content with Pacino is also good. There is a lot of serious kissing between them, which makes for more, good, believable videos.
I'm pretty sure the newer updates are from Pacino's Adventures. She has also showed up on a few other glam sites with implants. None of the content here has the implanted boobs. If this site was added to Pacino's Adventures as a bonus site, I would consider that the best Latina deal on the internet. As it is, knowing that 1/3 of this content is available on Pacino's Adventures, it takes away a little from both sites.
Still, very little to complain about when we're talking all videos on Gigi's site being HD. As of right now, I have less than half the content downloaded and am already over 25 GB, so the quality is high as is the focus on the content, Gigi. Pictures could be bigger, while the repetitive photos of the same pose for multiple pictures is a bit annoying, the photos are generally entertaining.
I went into a little more detail on the bonus sites in the Pacino's Adventures review, all are ok with La Zona Modelos standing out as the best of those.
Overall, I see this site as a 1 time join, unless Gigi comes back. It's one of the better solo sites and she's an excellent performer. For fans, a recommended join, if not a fan, I would say try Pacino's Adventures and watch a few of her videos there before joining this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that's about women having very visible, messy orgasms. Call it the opposite of a cumshot site.
- Smaller site than I realized with only 58 scenes but this is a relatively rare niche and they are updating once per week.
- Mostly top-level models that even I know of like Maya Bijou, Autumn Falls and Kali Roses.
- Very high technical quality on the videos.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Segpay for billing.
- Believable orgasms.
- Scenes average 35-45 minutes
- Unlimited downloads and streaming.
Cons:
- Tough con to talk about the size of the site. It's a newer site and those into this type of content would probably download all the scenes. Quantity vs Quality debate rages on.
- It could use a promo considering the size of the site.
- They have other sites that you can add on as a whole for $69 more. They also include each model's scenes from their other sites in the model list. It makes that $69 offer look more enticing. That's a con to me.
Bottom Line:
There's very few things I like better in sex or porn than seeing a woman's pleasure. Sites like this are not that common. You almost get the feeling the guys are competing to see how many times they can make the female they're paired with have an orgasm. It's a nice change of pace from scenes being focused on making the man cum.
Autumn Falls scene on here is the best scene I've seen her in. This site makes you wonder how many of the female models are holding back in other hardcore scenes on other sites. There is a relatively high percentage of both males and females that find their partner's pleasure more important than their pleasure. We don't see that much in porn.
Most of the action is pretty standard. Male/female, no threesomes or group sex or lesbian scenes. The only unique part about the content is the focus on the woman having orgasm(s). There's a certain level of tease in the scenes ... from the male. Not stripping or anything like that but pulling out as the woman starts to orgasm then penetrating and speeding up. Some of the orgasms the women have are those world-ending, mind-blowing, whole body shaking orgasms.
The technical side of the site stands out.
The videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p, the 720p option has two formats (mp4 and wmv) and 480p. That's on all 58 scenes.
The navigation could be better but since it's smaller site and all scenes are focused on the woman's orgasm it's not quite as important. There are no tags or search features. You just click scenes and they load up.
You do get some public content. Some of the scenes start with the model inserting a remote vibrator in herself and the male controlling it, could be by the pool, could be in a moving car.
You won't be shorted on orgasms. While Autumn Falls scene is my favorite of these, there are scenes with 7 orgasms, even 8 orgasms with other models. There are also squirting orgasms in some of the scenes. Notice my use of "some" that's because of the lack of tags. I would have to watch about 45 hours of these scenes to give exact numbers.
After joining, I realized adding the full package would have been a better option and deal but then again only a few of their other sites appeal to me. I've become a niche porn viewer. With the rare exceptions where there's a model I really like. I could watch Autumn Falls fall off a toilet and enjoy it.
I'm going above my average on the score since this niche is one I've always been interested in. It reminds me a little of the Japanese scenes where the men see how many times they can make the women orgasm. Add the very high quality of the videos and hopefully they'll keep adding new scenes every week. The pictures could be better quality, 1500 long end with zips and are the hybrid studio/screencap sets. This is where they film the model by herself to get 10 or so pictures/caps, usually fully clothed and going into tease, then the sets become screencaps from the video. Very good site for those into the niche, probably an average site to those not into the niche.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The future best lesbian site on the internet. As long as they keep updating.
- Only 73 scenes currently but 70 of them are 70 of the best lesbian scenes I've seen in years.
- Updates every 3-4 days.
- Top-tier models in every scene.
- Scenes are full of story and are in the 35-45 minute range each.
- Epoch is the biller.
- 95 models, various ages, most are in their teens/twenties.
- Excellent navigation and clean layout. It's a new site. Tags are accurate.
Cons:
- Size of the site has to be mentioned here.
- Price of the site is not going to be popular at $19.95 for streaming and $29.95 for downloading.
- Comes with no other sites.
Bottom Line:
Lesbian porn was my second favorite porn genre behind solo back 10-15 years ago but maybe more than any genre, lesbian porn has just slacked.
This site is owned by the group that owns Jules Jordan, a very good producer, director and actor. You can see the quality here both technically and in production values.
The videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p download options. The picture sets rival the top photo sites in both quality (technical and editing). Pictures are studio photo sets and top out at 4000 high end with zip downloads available. They also have screencaps as well.
The scenes remind me of Viv Thomas' heyday, back when a producer put two or more beautiful women in front of a camera and told them to go at it.
There are stories in each scene. These stories are even believable. Like two older real estate agents seducing a younger woman who is looking to buy a house. The model list just brought me up to date on the who's who of newer models. How have I not seen Alina Lopez before? Her scene on here with London River just went into my top 10 lesbian scenes of all-time. Have producers just slacked on this Alina Lopez and what looks like a lizard tongue?
The scenes are sensual, sometimes rough, there's licking everywhere, tribbing or scissoring whichever you prefer. There's kissing. There's a man walking around in the area of the house behind them without even noticing them. That's porn.
Most of the scenes do have the younger/older side to them but not near as extreme in the age difference. Stepmom finds out her stepdaughter is dating a girl and starts lecturing on how it's wrong, stepdaughter shows her why it's right.
My leaning here is Jules Jordan or whoever owns it went all in and decided they were finally going to make a lesbian site that whether realistic or not, showcases multiple naked women enjoying themselves and each other.
One of the big positives that didn't make its way into the pros is the models all speak English. If you're a Viv Thomas fan you know a lot of his lesbian scenes were great but hardly no English.
When do you ever watch a 40 minute scene and think, "I wish that was longer"? I did it here.
Here's some models that really stand out to me including the ageless wonder that is Brandy Love, Alina Lopez (she's in 8 scenes here), Adriana Chechik, Adira Allure, a personal favorite I haven't found much of Alex Coal, Autumn Falls, Cecilia Lion, Eliza Ibbara, Emily Willis and the shocker for me ... Georgia Jones. I thought she retired years ago? The always welcome Gina Valentina. The model list alone sells this site. I want to retire from my regular job and become the cameraman on this site.
I worked that in to compliment the cameraperson. Lesbian porn camerawork is very important and you won't miss hardly anything here, from a pretty 22 year old's tongue licking around an older woman's butthole at closeup, to the lost art of filming tribbing. The best filming of it is when the camera gets close enough to see the wet pussy lips sticking together and they do it here.
The size of the site might be a problem for some but it's not for me. I just hope they maybe come through with a promo. Especially if they're going to continue to update regularly and have this high of level models on it. I would join for a year just to see how great this site is going to become.
If it's an added plus, the site has only been updating since August 25, 2019 and they're already at 75 scenes. Maybe Jules is going to throw together a network with his own site and the other sites that group owns?
I would still just join this one for a year if a decent price was available. I think this is also as close to a porn site has got to with porn for men and women. It's not always soft and delicate, it's not always hard and violent but it has a little of all.
I can't say a new site that's not based on some weird fetish I have from high school, has impressed me this much ever.
My favorite scenes include the models starting out with light kissing and fingering themselves. That's not common these days. The acting is even good.
I didn't leave her out on purpose but there are 3 Vina Sky scenes here that are some of her best work. The threesome with Scarlett Sage and Adria Rae is really creative and enjoyable.
The cons are not big deals to me. I probably won't join it more than 3-4 times a year unless the price comes down a little but getting me to join a site 3-4 times a year these days is something only a few sites can do. I also would recommend it to collectors and you know you have to do the download option. I just download everything, videos, photos, screencaps.
It's as high as I'll go on a score for a site this size and hope they'll keep pushing it with the creativity and top models. It has 100 potential.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very realistic and believable amateur site.
- Really pretty women considering the nature of the site, also see a blend of races and shapes.
- Videos are clear, but have to go premium to get the 1080p videos, my membership came with 720p as the top option. Which is fine with me.
- Download speed is above average, the newer releases seem to take a little longer to download.
- The scenes are generally long (40-50 minutes).
- Bonus access to Girls Do Toys, BTS content and interviews.
- From the best I can tell they update weekly, this leads into the cons that others have pointed out too.
Cons:
- What the hell is going on with this site's navigation? I'm glad I was OCD before joining it, otherwise, it would have made me OCD. I'll go more into this in the bottom line.
- No pictures? If there are pictures I can't find them.
- Premium upgrade for the 1080p, I honestly wish sites would just remove that option since it makes me feel like I'm missing out on something. Hey, blame the OCD from the navigation!
Bottom Line:
Okay, I really like this site. It's repetitive, but the models are the draw. I don't recognize hardly any of these women from other sites or from DVDs, there could be some though. I don't mind the silly premium upgrade part, it's just I don't understand why sites are going to it. I will be really frustrated if I find out there are pictures if you upgrade, otherwise, they lose 5 points for no pictures. What's the point of amateur girls if you don't show them in their regular clothes and have a little tease?
This site's navigation isn't the worst I've seen, but it's confusing. When you click a scene to download or stream, 12 more scenes pop up directly under the streaming video. It reminds me of the scene cutter Videobox uses except the content is just other models. There's no names on the models. The filenames are numbers. Give me some organization please. There's no model list since there's no model names. Do they maybe have multiple scenes of certain models or no?
Having said that, that's all that's wrong with this site. It's a lot since I now have a folder with a bunch of unidentifiable files in it, but the content is very good. It's slightly irritating since I'm not the first person who has complained, which means they most likely have no plans to correct it.
Instead of something easy and logical, you'll find 33 pages of videos with 12 models per page, unless you look through them from the main page where you'll find 49 pages of 8 models. Jeez.
Back to the models, late teens, early 20s, skinny, athletic, well-built (butts and boobs), white, black, mixed, Asian, Hispanic, it's a dream come true for someone like me. Of course I could say I want to see some more built models and maybe some slightly heavier ones, but overall, these models are what I like. Now, if I just knew their names so I could find them when I'm looking through the folder of numbered files.
I don't know if my score is that fair. I know I generally rate higher, but a lot of that is based on my own problems with understanding the difference between a 50 and a 70. I'm rating it above average for me just because of the models. The amateur aspect does bring in some of those scenes where it's way too clear that the model is just there for the money, not to enjoy the sex. And while I'll agree and understand that, it does hurt some of the appeal.
With all the navigation issues, I'd still recommend it for a month, if you like amateur models, you'll probably love this site, would go another 10 points on the score if they did something with the navigation, model names and added photos.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I once questioned if this site was for me (2008 review of an 81), it's still around and it's now one of my favorites!
- One of the most unique porn sites on the internet.
- I could be wrong since some of these models could be on other sites but I don't know any of the models from anywhere except this site.
- They have a little of everything for everyone, as far as body types, pubic hair, and real amateur models.
- The site works well and loads quickly, important since I assume their servers are in Australia. DL speeds are very good (about 80% of my max).
- Despite the amateur genre, the content is very high quality.
- You won't ever feel like you're watching cookie-cutter porn on this site. Very unique scenes with what looks like real, believable sex.
- While you're not likely to find an Eve Angel here, I have found many favorites through the years and they all look like women I see in everyday life.
- Billing is handled by Epoch.
- No cross-sales
Cons:
- I will stress this one. In 2007 or 2008, whenever I reviewed this site originally, here at PU, I was neck deep in the Eastern European porn boom that seemed to churn out "perfect 10" models weekly. I questioned the quality of the models here at Girls Out West. And it's important to say, I still don't like every model and I would guess most porn users wouldn't like every model.
- This site has a true pro/con, that I'm listing as a con. It's addictive. The models are almost all new to you if you've never been a member and some are so cute or so pretty that you just have to check out their content. I've been a member for 3 months now after only meaning to join for 1 month.
Bottom Line:
It's worth mentioning that I've typed this out six times only to run out of characters before finishing and starting over. That hasn't happened since probably 2016. In short, Girls Out West, has been a fountain of youth for my porn interest. I once heavily criticized this site, 2008 or 2009, with an 81 review here at PU. Which is below average for my scoring. I didn't like that every model wasn't a perfect 10 and didn't like underarm hair on some of the models. I still don't like underarm hair but I just don't pay attention to it like I used to.
It was a different porn world back then. Eastern Europe ruled the porn world, perfect ten models, prissy, feminine models. They also had two of porn's greatest producers Denys DeFrancesco and Viv Thomas filming back then. In 2019, we have a bunch of models that are just like the last model and producers that think porn is 19 minutes and 56 seconds per scene with the same 5 positions highlighted, in order.
Girls Out West changes that. The main focuses of this site are solo models and lesbian scenes, there are male/female scenes but they're not that common in numbers compared to the other two:
Roughly 2,000 solo scenes, roughly 1,500 lesbian scenes, roughly 300-400 male/female scenes. Hopefully, you're adding that up to nearly 4,000 amateur scenes. They also have over 2,000 photo sets that are shot more in the style of Denys DeFrancesco (DDF) than current photographers. Including starting with a fully dressed model that giggles in some pictures, teases, then is fully nude.
There's personality here that you don't find in many sites these days. The more than 2 models, lesbian scenes have the feeling of, "What happened, she was naked and I got horny so I got naked and those two over there got horny and got naked then we all got together."
Besides the huge amount of exclusive content there's also the technical quality with some videos having 4K dating back a couple years, 1080p, 720p dating back more than a decade. That's rare for amateur sites.
I decided to try Girls Out West again when I saw a picture set, on a free TGP site, of a model named Rubi Valentine. She was cute, playful, sexy, exotic, natural. To my surprise, the watermark was Girls Out West. I joined in November 2018 and am still a member, another rarity for me to let a membership recur for 3 months. I can't help it. With that much back archive and daily updates, it seems like I'm just now seeing every model at least once and have downloaded over 100 models content from the site. That's another plus, the majority of the models have more than one video/photo set, some even have over 20. Besides my initial attraction to Rubi Valentine, once a member, I discovered Lulu. An incredibly cute model that has a "kind you don't take home to mother" side to her. Sorry for the Rick James reference. There's Bianca that could easily have been a top 3 model in the Eastern Euro boom of models.
There's also the frustration in myself for overlooking this site for over a decade. This is the closest I've seen to real, believable sex in porn in years. The Australian accents don't hurt, either. Neither does the kinky, frizzy hair that was made popular years ago. That, in and of itself, is exotic these days. Exotic to me is a look. It could be a darker complexion, it could be dark complexion with green eyes, it could be a hairstyle that's uncommon, an attitude or personality that's not phony (sorry Los Angeles) and Girls Out West does those types of models better than any site that I've joined over the last 5 years.
I won't give it a 100 simply because these models are not for everyone. Including me over a decade ago. I also haven't been a member long enough to say the site is a 100. That's probably my fault. I will say it's the first site I've felt constantly drawn to since joining, since the first time I joined Zishy. The blend of models, slim, heavier, darker complexion, pale complexion, freckles, it's all believable, real.
The amount of content: Close to 4,000 videos, 2,000+ photo sets, is unheard of in the amateur world unless it's one of those amateur sites that has a bunch of 18 second clips. There are interview videos that are fun to watch. The accents and personalities really shine in those. It takes me back to a time when porn was fun, models were shooting it for money but also because they loved having sex and losing inhibitions. There are exhibitionist, voyeuristic, scenes here too. I haven't noticed many implants or tattoos but considering these models come off as genuine, I'm not for sure those would bother most viewers.
It's rare that I let a site recur this long with intentions to go at least one more month. Besides the video quality that is hard to find in amateur porn, the newer photos are 6000x4000 resolution! It's even rarer that I feel bad about giving a 97. Give it a try, at least look at the previews. It has become one of my most recommended sites to others.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that offers very realistic lesbian sex
- Not for sure, but I had never seen these models. If I have, I didn't recognize them, so it definitely brings new amateur models
- Navigation is good, which is important since I don't know these models and had to sift through them to find the ones that interested me
- Movie quality is good enough at 640 high end, 2000 bitrate
- Pictures are high resolution and zipped, though see the cons
Cons:
- To be blunt, there are more than a few not attractive models here. Will explain in Bottom Line
- I didn't get very good DL speeds, though it wasn't terrible about 100 kb/s lower than what I'm used to getting
- Sorry to those who like hairy women, it is a con to me, some of these girls look like they have Sasquatch in a leg headlock, major turn-off for me, but if you like that this is a pro
- Most of the picture sets didn't interest me, so having the high res, zips, wasn't really a factor. Relax, I'm going to explain in the BL
- Price seemed a little high at $25
Bottom Line:
My annual "lets try a real amateur site" attempt. Ok, if you like only real amateurs this is a very good site. If you like hairy women, this is a good site. If you like glamour girls, this is not a good site.
I won't knock the quality since it is very good, navigation is very good and you can tell that a lot of hard work is put into this site.
On the good news, some of these girls are beautiful. You get a nice blend of body shapes and sizes and I really liked that about the site. The sex, whether b/g or g/g is very believable and let me repeat, there are some very pretty girls here. Especially if you like redheads, which I do.
Then there is the bad side. Some of these girls are unshaven. I'm not a shaven beaver freak, my favorite model is Eve Angel and she almost always has pubic hair.
Some of these girls are not very good looking either, not in an ugly way, but it is like some of them just rolled out of bed, no make-up, flat hair types. Let me put it this way, some of these women in my guess are real lesbians, not the lipstick kind either.
Having said that, that is just my preferences showing. I can applaud this site for staying true to their niche and if you are into very regular girls blended with the occasional knockout, you will like this site better than I did. Quality is fine all around too. Just not my cup of tea overall. So, I will recommend it for those who like the unshaven natural types, real lesbian fans, but can't recommend it for glam fans.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Now part of a network (Sapphix). Personally, I would join it by itself for the price but you also get the excellent Sapphic Erotica with it and Fist Flush (less than 100 scenes).
- Originally one of the first sites to exclusively record almost "vulgar" masturbation by the top European models (pre-2010). You'll even notice a comment here on PU from 2010 that talks about it no longer updating.
- It's updating, not a lot but it is updating.
- Seems to have some conflicting plots in the newer content, some scenes are of a model masturbating while she watches porn that you can see on the video. Others are more in the traditional Give Me Pink style, which I will go into.
- Excellent download speeds and it's needed, the 4K scenes are upwards of 15GB.
- The archive of this site could be the best archive you're going to find for unique content of the top models from the Euro models from 2005-2010.
Cons:
- Well, if you never thought about what it would be like to be a gynecologist, you might not like some of the content.
- Solo porn isn't as popular these days and this is a solo site.
- Still baffled by the milk shooting out of the butt scenes.
Bottom Line:
I decided to go ahead and review Give Me Pink since there's no new info on it here on PU. I also did a review for Sapphix, the network they now share with Sapphic Erotica and Fist Flush.
The 2005-2010 era of porn was special to me. I really hadn't paid much attention to European porn until that era. Eve Angel is my favorite but there are others like Sophie Moone, Sandy from Club Sandy, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone, Peaches and Eufrat, these six (I hope that's the six) where labeled by me as "The no take dick six". It wasn't the nicest label since it's based on all of them having interviews with mostly broken English where they say they no take dick. All of them did at one point in their careers but once the Euro boom started, they refused to be with men. My belief is these models knew their performances as solo and lesbian models would determine if they could keep making porn without being with a man.
A few others worth mentioning: Zafira, Anette Dawn and Anetta Keys. These models with the 6 from above dominated the porn world, every site you went to had them featured. You could join Twistys (an American site) and there they were. Twistys loved Anette Dawn so much that they gave her, her own solo site. Eve, Sandy and Sandra had their own solo sites too. Maybe I'm being too sentimental but these models did the things that you see porn users complaining about now, like eye contact, expressions, stripping and bringing out erotic thoughts in your mind.
Then came Give Me Pink. A site that looked like most Euro sites but it was very different. Models that we were used to seeing finger themselves softly, were bouncing their ankles up around their ears and sticking whatever they could find in them. They were visibly wet, dildos were coming out soaked with their white liquids. I really liked it but am sure I once complained that it was "weird" and maybe even repetitive. The weirdness was mostly towards the use of milk shooting out of the model's butt. It killed the eroticism for me. I would sit there and think, "Did she just fart?"
Even so, the content was very unique for the time period and it was the only way you could see "all" of some of these models. That was the selling point, plus it had that all-important, "100% exclusive" but the site did stop updating. Before I take too much credit of digging through 2,000+ scenes to figure out which are Give Me Pink scenes, they do have a tag that let's you see just the Give Me Pink content. That's a nice feature and much appreciated.
I've went through and can see that the content stopped on 5/5/2009. It started back on 7/8/2013. Now, you can see why some might be surprised to see it back again, over 4 years of no content.
Since 7/8/2013, they have released 2 full scenes per month, that's a full video and photo set that is a professional-level photo set for download and they also offer the video caps for viewing. I used the comparison in my review of the network and will again, this content reminds me of In the Crack. Extremely high quality, you can download the videos in multiple formats and starting in 2015, the videos even include a 4K option.
The video style has changed some in the 2018 scenes. They're using a new style by having the models watch porn on their laptop. You can see the porn they're watching and it's from a tube site! I like this newer style. The classic, almost hardcore, masturbation is still great so this is a welcome change.
Here's my count:
The "older" content prior to their hiatus has 244 scenes (video and photo set) they were updating once a week back then.
The newer content (2013 forward) has 122 scenes. That's a lot of newer content that is probably being looked over by those that don't know the site is back.
I think the archived content alone would appeal to collectors and the newer content even has some "old favorites". Like Cindy Hope, who has content in the older content and in the newer content too. I would say it's a very good alternative for those looking for porn similar to In the Crack. I'm even thinking someone asked the question about content similar to In the Crack. Plus, you get Sapphic Erotica, the best lesbian site, added to it.
If you join "Sapphix" the network, be sure to click on "movies" from there you will see a link that says "search by tag". You can then pick Give Me Pink or Fist Flush or Sapphic Erotica. They also have a button on the main page, a drop-down box, that doesn't work. It shows you the first page but none of the others. This is similar to hitting the jackpot for a collector. And yes, the score is higher on the site than the network. I've only done that a few times in the past and it's similar. As I mentioned in this review, the network button for separating the content into each site doesn't work. The initial page I saw when joining advertised 7 sites with Sapphic, I only received 2 with Sapphic. It's a minimal point difference but it just shows they need to fix the network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-22-0911:34pm (Update History) Reason: Site stopped updating in Feb 2009, still great quality, for amount of archived content can't hold a 94 without new updates.
Pros:
- Has to be one of the highest quality sites on the internet.
- Model selection is very good, nearly all top Euro models have at least 1 set, some have as many as 4.
- Picture sets are some of the most complete that I have seen. You can download a zip of the high res photos, and/or a set of screenshots from each set. Will explain more in BL
- Videos do vary a bit, older ones have the highest option of 512 high end with 1500 bitrate, newer ones have 4 options that range from a small mpg to full HD 1920x1080 with 8000 bitrate.
- Very download manager friendly, especially if you just allow 1 DL to run at a time, I had 38 files in mine (1 DL at time, others cued up) last night and those were done without any errors
- DL speed is 99% my max speed
- Navigation is very clean and neat with well-placed buttons for video, pictures, screenshots for each set
Cons:
- Can be repetitive, as most solo sites do become repetitive.
- If you plan on getting the Full HD files be prepared to look into an external hard drive, files near 2 GB each, not a con for me, but could be for some.
- Some of the older sets especially do have some different content, like speculum, shooting milk from their butts, the good thing is, most of this is at the end of the videos which are usually 30 minutes+ each
Bottom Line:
This is my updated review of Give Me Pink. I do agree with Denner that there are some shots that might be a little too close-up for some tastes, but overall, I really like the content. I just skip the weird parts.
This site, has nearly every major Euro model that I know of. Here are some of the major Euro stars and number of sets they have: Eve Angel (4), Peaches (4) Sandra Shine (2), Sophie Moone (2), Zafira (2), Gianna/Ginger B (3), Cindy Hope (3), Eve Smile (2), Simony, Anita Pearl and Suzie Carina all have 1 set and there are 100+ more models. In each of these sets is a 30 minute video, high res picture set usually 50 or so pictures, screenshots that number up to 300, for each set.
That to me is very complete.
The picture sets are worth noting. I can't give an exact date, but it has been over a year, that the picture sets come with a high res set that is 2250 high end and screenshots that are 1900 high end. When you download the screenshots you get both a folder with the 1900 high end ones and another folder with 1024 high end copies. I would guess this is for those who are looking to save some hard drive space and want to keep the smaller ones.
What is amounts to, to me, is that this site especially over the last year gives you nearly everything you could possibly ask for. The extremely high quality true HD videos, the 2250 high res zipped photos, the high end 1900 screenshots that are also zipped.
I think that puts me in a bind. I don't care for the extreme content of a beautiful woman squirting milk 10 feet from her butt, but the quality makes it impossible for me to score low. I guess if the whole video focused on the extreme, I would knock some off the score, but a large portion of the videos are of these often considered timid, glamour softcore Euro models masturbating in very intense hardcore fashion.
I think what I'm trying to say is that this site shows you a side of these gorgeous runway quality models being very kinky.
Another plus for me is that these models seem to really enjoy working with this site. You get a lot of big playful smiles from them in the sets and they look like they are having fun and enjoying it.
As you can see, there is very little, outside of personal preferences, to dislike about this site. The specs on the videos are as high as any site and the several options for videos really push it up near the top. I would score it higher, but would love to see them take another step up and remaster the older videos, at least to 960 high end.
Note that I only download the 1900 high end videos of my favorite models. They have a nice 960 high end, 5000 bitrate wmv that is smaller, but still higher quality than the vast majority of sites offer.
If you're a fan of Peaches, her sets here are amazing. As are 90% of the models. The only real negative is one update per week. If they could maybe squeeze one remastered update in I would be considering an even higher score! Recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good selection of Europe's best models doing some pretty extreme insertions.
- Very high quality videos, even the pictures have a glossy look to them (may be my eyes playing tricks on me)
- Good amount of content, upwards of 140-150 models, vids are long and the HD ones are huge in file size.
Cons:
- Some of the insertions are more than I like to see.
- A little high for any consideration of more than one month membership at a time.
Bottom Line:
Let me start off by saying that I am lactose intolerant, meaning I get deathly sick if I digest something with a dairy product in it. What does that have to do with this review? Some of the shoots have the women squirting milk out of the butts, you also get the extreme sized dildos being shoved in some of the prettiest women you will ever see, Sophie and Eve are both on here as are 130 more.
My problem comes in that while I like to see these beautiful women enjoying themselves for us to watch, I don't like seeing them look like they are tearing their guts out. I understand it is an original idea and believe me, I still watch! I'm just giving a heads up for those who haven't been on the site. Overall, it is great, tons of teasing to start the videos which are almost all over 30 minutes each. I think the teasing is very important, especially when you know they are going to finally take it off. It builds you up. Videographer is one lucky man/woman on this site. Extreme close-ups, has some speculum vids and pics for you all that have the medical fetish. I really could do without the milk squirting videos, but it is usually only the last minute or so of the video and isn't the main focus.
I very much recommend it, especially if you have never been a member. I think this site shows Peaches in a way that you have probably never seen her. She really gets into her vids on here and is worth the monthly price just by herself. Add those other 140 or so models, recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Huge site, especially considering that it comes with two other sites if you sign up through Crissy Moran's site.
- Haven't went through the 1,000+ scenes yet to see if all are, but all of the videos I've downloaded are coming up in 640 resolution. Which according to standards is now considered DVD resolution.
- Tons of models, Eva Angelina, Audrey Bitoni, Anetta Keys, Antianna Amarillo (had trouble finding much of her anywhere else!)
- Got to love a site that says "still no ugly chicks"
Cons:
- Non exclusive content, but I haven't seen most of the content that I have downloaded so far
- Pictures could be bigger
Bottom Line:
I signed up for Crissy Moran's site, and this site and Amateur Models Gone Bad came with it. When I opened this Glamour site for the first time, I was expecting your usual 3rd rate cheap site, only to find out that it could easily stand on its own.
Note, if you have been on many sites like this one, some of this content may not be new to you. I noticed in each review on TBP that each reviewer listed that it isn't exclusive content, but since a lot of my viewing is on individual sites, the content of this many models is new to me. The navigation is very easy to use with a models page that lists each model and shows a good size thumbnail of each. The videos are really nice looking, I have to wonder at what point are we asking too much when a site has over 1,000 videos, and we are still asking for higher than DVD resolution for $24.95.
The pictures could be better/bigger, but they aren't that bad, considering it comes off more as a video site anyway. The good news is that the pictures are available in zip sets and do have upwards of 100 pics per set.
I keep going back to what is and what isn't exclusive, with so many models, I have to think that at least some of it is going to be new to the members. I know that I hadn't found hardly any content of Antianna Amarillo, and found her very attractive, so her section was my first to visit.
Very good site overall, especially if you are a fan of Crissy Moran, and get this site free with hers. I recommend it based on that!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I have always liked Gloryhole scenes and honestly didn’t realize this site is on the same network as Gloryhole.com.
- They do something on this site that I like and that is the opposite of the better-known Gloryhole.com site, they have a lot of black girls with white guys.
- It also surprised me that they have 341 scenes. The updating is still happening but it looks like they are inconsistent with it. There were two new updates in October 2020.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max)
- Navigation on the site is good as well as the network being easy to switch from site to site.
- They use Epoch as the biller and usually will offer you a discounted price when you go to cancel.
Cons:
- The older scenes have 480p as the largest downloadable file.
- I think some of these women are amateurs and they look like women you could find in a truck stop bathroom. Maybe that should be a pro since it’s believable?
Bottom Line:
Many years ago, I was in undergraduate school (late 90s) and I remember some of the students warning about the public restrooms on campus. I hadn’t ever heard of a gloryhole but that’s what they were calling it back then too. The difference being, the ones doing the pleasuring were older, male professors. I can remember other students saying, “Life is like a gloryhole, you stick your dick in it and never know what you’re going to get.”
I guess the appeal of seeing mostly attractive women being what you get on the other side of the gloryhole has always intrigued me. I think the politically correct television show, “What would you do?” should set up some gloryholes and see how women respond to a dick popping through a hole in the bathroom stall.
There’s very little difference from scene to scene. There are some scenes that turn into sex through the gloryhole instead of just a blowjob. I think it took the gloryhole sites a few years to realize they could pull off sex. I can see a producer having that Eureka moment. The negative with the ones that turn into sex is the camera angle. You either get the side view which only shows the penetration if they woman is flexible enough to lift her leg high enough for you to see or you get the down under camera angle that’s looking up at the sex. That angle sometimes takes a few seconds to realize what you’re looking at. I do think the niche is starting to wear thin. Maybe there’s a new twist they could throw on it?
You do get a large collection here with 341 scenes. Besides videos they do offer downloadable zipped photo sets. The technical quality does have a few problems. The older scenes only offer 480p as the largest download option and the newer scenes have the $4 per 4K scene option if you want 4K. The quality varies over the years with most of the scenes at least offering 720p and the newer ones having 720p and 1080p.
The best part to me is a lot of the newer scenes have a black woman with a white man. The older scenes didn’t incorporate that version of interracial. It is an underrepresented niche in porn as far as I’m concerned. As I say that, the network itself has a site listed as new called, We Fuck Black Girls.
I do think this site is only good for those into gloryhole/voyeur type sites. Most of the women do a good job of making it believable that they are really into the scenes. It’s another site I don’t think could stand on its own but as part of a large network it’s a nice site worth checking out.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the oldest online porn niche sites (first scene was 2003).
- Classic scenario (gloryhole) brought into the internet age except the taboo is white women with black men.
- 651 scenes up to 1080p download (details on resolution in Bottom Line).
- Photos/screencaps available for download.
- Simplistic navigation but requires a lot of clicking.
- Epoch is the biller.
- Still updating every two weeks.
Cons:
- The common con of heavy-niche content becoming repetitive applies here, though they and others have tried to add more to this niche.
- The dull scenes, this niche, maybe more than any in porn should bring out some kind of primal excitement from the female or fear but some of the models on here show no excitement or taboo stimulation.
- Not a con for me but if you want 4K you're going to have to pay $3.99 to $4.99 PER scene.
Bottom Line:
This site and Blacks and Blondes were two very important sites in my online porn interests. There was an old TGP site that had 5-10 second clips of porn scenes (early 2000s) and Blacks on Blondes and Gloryhole were two of the sites often featured. They would put 2-4 of these 5-10 second clips up for download and you would then have to merge them or load them in a playlist to watch them in correct order.
I was only early 20s though I had been exposed to porn (VHS/DVD/Magazines) for years. Gloryhole was probably the first I had seen that had a niche or story to it. At the time, I was also an undergraduate student and remember the university I was attending at the time actually having "real" gloryhole "problems" in some of the less used buildings. Those real ones were more for gay men like the married professor who would go to one of the gloryhole restrooms to get or give a blowjob to or from a college guy. Keeping in mind, "gay" was not as mainstream back then as was taboo for a heterosexual married male with children to risk getting caught in a restroom with another male.
I later heard of couples that wanted to experience something different using it as a way to experience swinger life without going full swinger.
The scenes here follow a fairly repetitive format. The big difference between scenes is the female model. Some are there to collect a check. Some will masturbate a little before starting the blowjob through the wall. Some do a good job of making you feel like they're genuinely excited, others don't. It is the upside and downside of Gloryhole porn. There's not a lot of middle ground. The scenes either seem to be near perfect or barely watchable.
Someone did come up with the idea of adding sex through the gloryhole. This is also hit or miss. If the cameraperson is unable to get a good angle, all you see is the side of the woman bouncing back and forth into a wall. Other times the cameraperson gets a closeup and steady view of the penetration.
Considering how long this site has been around their collection is not that large with only 651 scenes in 17 years. That's less than an average of one new scene per week since its start. On the other hand, this is not a common niche. I remember once searching gloryhole scenes on a DVD site and finding maybe 8.
They have tried multiple variations of the blowjob through the hole in the wall from sex through the hole in the wall to multiple guys.
The ones I seem to like the best are the ones where the woman is giving a blowjob through the gloryhole while fingering herself.
There's not much to complain about with the site and quality unless you want 4K. These are exact numbers, the most recent 190 scenes have up to 1080p and also have the purchasable 4K upgrade for each of those 190 scenes. The 220 scenes before those had up to 720p. The other roughly 50% scenes are 480p and below.
I do think they could have done something to fix the disparity in quality. A mass remastering of all those 480p and below scenes up to 720p (minimum) would make the content on this site very collectible being a rare niche usually filmed in poor to average quality.
As it is, it's an above average site with what is becoming a repetitive niche just because of the limitations the wall presents. That shouldn't take away from its importance in porn history as a site that was taking major chances nearly 20 years ago.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the premier old/young sites in my opinion.
- 260 scenes, but some are bonus scenes that are not downloadable.
- Has been averaging 3 updates per month with 1 being a bonus scene.
- 4K available since late 2017.
- Downloadable photo sets and everything is unlimited.
- Mostly cute female models that look completely out of place with these older males.
- The bonus scenes, while not downloadable are streaming and they are from other sites so those could be seen as useful.
Cons:
- Lacking in navigational features. No model lists, no update schedule, categories are not as accurate as they should be. It's not a major con since the site isn't huge but I'm known for small problems like these to annoy me.
- Would like to see more group scenes or threesomes. I personally liked Grandparents X better in that regard.
- Doing the double pro/con on the bonus scenes. They're mixed in with the regular updates.
Bottom Line:
Granddadz would have been my pick as the best of the younger/older sites if not for GrandparentsX. From the way I see the content on Granddadz it used to be the site Beauty and the Senior.
The scenes are standard for the genre. Others have mentioned the older men possibly being limited as to what they can do in scenes and it does seem that way. It's not to take away from the scenes, if I'm able to handle a young women in her 20s, when I'm in my 60s and 70s, I'll be very proud of myself!
The navigation and layout problems do hurt it a little. One in every 4 scenes (a row) is a bonus scene and most of them are not younger/older content. I've seen bonus scenes from Team Skeet, All Internal/Perfect Gonzo and those are in the way, is how I see them. No model list if you find a model you like, you can't look to see if they have any other scenes.
The quality helps make up for it. Besides having 4K back to December 2017, every other scene before the 4K started, has 540p, 720p and 1080p plus downloadable pics/screencaps. I didn't put this as a con since I rarely stream videos but the videos can not be skipped forward when streaming unless I'm doing something wrong.
My general feeling towards these older/younger scenes is I need a younger female in the scene. I know there are a few sites that have older women with younger guys, I don't particularly care for those scenes. Which is a strength here as the scenes are older men with teen/20-something women.
I think the scenes, in this genre, being believable is an important part. In general, the girls/women seem to be impressed or flattered that the old guys can get it up for them and perform. A few of them women don't give a good performance and seem to just be there to collect a check. Overall though, it's believable. A few of the old guys seem to be more appealing to the women.
There's not much story here. Some of the scenes will also make you feel like you're lost. One of the newest scenes is under 20 minutes, two older guys (70s, I would guess) are laying in their hospital beds in the same room. A cute nurse comes in, kisses with both of the men, gives them views up her skirt, some blowjob action, the scene then seems to edit to the two men giving her oral and it ends. That goes back to me mentioning not being able to forward during the streaming. I had downloaded the 720p version of it so I'm wondering if the scene has a full video option on one of the other resolutions as this one seems to be missing some of the scene.
It's still a good site as the older scenes go for full scenes with oral, vaginal, cumshot. I would rank it as the best of the older/younger content based on quantity and quality. Grandparents X was for me a better overall site but it had less than 40 scenes on it. Good overall site that could be better with a few tweaks.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Older/younger porn which I didn't expect since it's GrandparentsX. Some major fetishes explored here.
- Up to 4K on the video downloads, also 1080, 720 and 540.
- 35 videos and 34 photo sets, no download limits. While the amount of content is low, I downloaded every scene and have kept them for the fetishes they go into (will explain in BL). Also has 8 videos that I guess are from another of their sites, you can only stream those.
- The younger female models are very attractive, I would say top-tier quality.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
- No ads but they do list scenes from their other sites.
Cons:
- Small collection. This is the only reason the score isn't higher.
- Sporadic updates, each of the last two months only have one official update with both months also having a "bonus" update you can stream. In January, they had 3 updates. December only had 1 official and 1 "bonus".
- Scenes could be longer, 4 people in a 22 minute scene is a little shorter than I would like.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those sites that appealed to me simply because I saw some of the fetishes it includes.
I'm not a big fan of old and young porn. Especially when it's one older person with one younger person. I don't see the taboo of it and am not quite old enough to really enjoy older men with younger women.
But this site, it has threesomes and foursomes. This means you see scenes where a younger guy is pounding away at a much older woman while his pretty, young girlfriend masturbates while watching them. There are scenes that go into swinging with young couples switching partners with an older couple.
This reminds me of the type or porn that breaks a mold. It's one I've talked about before. They are adding a voyeur into the scene as one watches. My favorite DVD series of the last 20 years was "The Watcher" by Vivid. This site touches on that fetish.
A bonus is all of the older people are not unattractive. Some of the women look similar to women you would see on Anilos.
Still, it needs more updates. The reason I'm not a porn site owner is I would put this high on my priority list and have a minimum of 4 updates per month.
The numbers aren't impressive with only 35 videos and unless my counting is wrong, 34 photo sets. The quality of the videos is excellent. Every video has 4K and the site has only been updating since November 2018.
It seems their initial plan was to have it be older/younger women as the first 3 scenes they updated with were just females. After those, they started adding older and younger men. All of the non-bonus scenes have more than 2 people in them. With the most being 5 people.
It's a site with a lot of potential in my eyes. But not everyone sees things the way I do. I think playing to the voyeur watching (viewer) by putting a voyeur in the scene give the viewer a feeling of she or he is doing the same thing I'm doing.
The site also comes with a streaming network of over 14,000 videos. It's not of much use to me but I thought I should mention it. This one falls under the quality/quantity amount of value heading. I downloaded 35 videos I'm likely to keep all of. That is more than I can say for a lot of sites with 10,000 scenes and I do think it's because of the fetish. For years, porn has tried threesomes with all 3 people involved directly in the sex for the entire scene. That formula is stale for me. This site gives me something I haven't seen done on a regular basis since the early 2000s. I would like to go higher on the score. I could always use the old there's 35 scenes, that would equal 7 DVDs so it's still a good value thought.
I think it is and you should check the previews out if you're curious.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my favorite niches of porn, the competition, playful games, some of these scenes are from the once legendary Fucking Gamble site.
- Over 300 downloadable scenes.
- Photo downloads, which are very useful in this niche similar to how photos help with exhibitionism videos. There are things you miss in videos.
- Updates every week but see cons.
- 408 models with some scenes having as many as 4-5 in one scene.
- The outdoor scenes far overshadow the indoor ones.
- Download speed is very good (about 80-85%) worth mentioning as some scenes are big files.
- The oldest scenes I do believe are from Fucking Gamble and some are as long as 3 hours.
Cons:
- Newer scenes don't have much of a "game" twist to them and are much shorter, some are less than 20 minutes, a sharp contrast from a 3 hour scene.
- The indoor scenes take a lot of the exhibitionism/voyeurism feel out of the scenes.
- The oldest scenes which are the best only go up to 720p, which is my preference but I know some prefer 1080p.
Bottom Line:
A big part of my high score is for the first 100 or so scenes. To have scenes that have actual competitions and last over 2 hours each is like having a full DVD of porn in one scene. I hope I'm not crossing any lines by saying some of the scenes are from Fucking Gamble, a site long loved by Porn User members in the early years of Porn Users. I'm more looking to make others aware of those scenes being on here.
Admittedly, some of those scenes are too long and too drawn out but it was unlike any porn, even other game porn sites. There's a naked croquet scene, a strip version of basketball that turns into an all out orgy with the only downside being some of those top out at 720p but their file sizes even at 720p are 10GB+, the ones that have 1080p are in the 15GB - 20GB range. These were legitimate games being played though most looked planned since everyone eventually ends up naked.
The models are often top-tier from the 2010-2014 era and you get a feeling some of them were really into the competition. It would then come out in their sexual performance.
The newer scenes seem to be more focused on indoor group sex, the scenes are much shorter, to give an example, the three newest scenes are 19, 13 and 35 minutes. If you go to the oldest scenes, the 3 oldest are 2 hours or more each. The longest I've seen was nearly 4 hours.
I think that is important to know before joining. It's almost like a tale of two different sites. Some of the newer scenes are good, especially if you're into gangbangs, blowbangs, but if you're here for the game scenes you're going to want to go to the oldest updates and work your way forward.
The quality overall is good, none of the scenes have 4K, but I'm going to estimate 90% have up to 1080p, they also have 720p and 540p on all scenes.
One of the best parts of the older scenes for me is the models are all dressed in regular clothes that fits the setting. If it's a pool party they might have on bikinis or tank tops and shorts. You get a lot of teasing between the start of the scene and up to fully nude.
The screen capture sets play a big role too. Most have between 300-400 screencaps. These often catch a model starting to strip, showing cameltoe and those things you miss in moving video.
There is, to my surprise, a model list. It surprises me because some scenes have as many as 4-5 women and 3-5 guys. There are well-known models like Annie Cruz, Abbie Cat, Adriana Luna, Angel Dark, Anne Marie Rios and I'm stopping as I'm making myself feel old since most of these models are no longer active.
I would call those older scenes some of porn's most creative and most historically important as it showed what a lot of us wondered about back in the early 2010s, were porn fans just wanting sex and pulling away from creativity and sites that were really trying to be different?
We know the answer now. You don't see porn like these older scenes anymore and that makes them very good to me. I could have done without the newer scenes and still would have scored it in the 90s.
I rarely say much more about the download speed than a mention in the pros or cons but these scenes are downloading very fast for me which as you probably know is important when you're talking about a 15GB+ scene.
A great site overall and if they ever started shooting the long, game style scenes again, that would probably get my only 100.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very erotic, uncensored, Japanese handjob site.
- It’s probably worth taking the cross-sale offer, they offer Fellatio Japan for $2.95 for 2 days, recurs at $19.95/mo. Fellatio Japan is $35 normally.
- High quality throughout, videos all have up to 1080p with 8000 bitrate, they also have 720p and 540p options.
- Very good photo/screencaps coming in at 5760x3840 and are downloadable in zips.
- There are 240 scenes and every one of them is worth downloading.
- Very good download speeds (80% of max)
- Vendo is the biller which is why I said it’s safe to take the cross-sale, if you don’t like Fellatio Japan you could easily cancel it before the 2 days are up.
- Clean navigation with simple buttons and the forever scroll feature.
Cons:
- They posted a message in May, that said they would no longer be updating the site. I don’t know if it’s Coronavirus-related or if it includes their other sites but 240 exclusive handjob scenes like these is a lot.
- Handjob porn always has this problem. Some of the women are very good with their hand. Others are not and those are usually the best since they turn to teasing the guy’s dick with their butt or pussy.
Bottom Line:
This was an impulse join. After watching so many censored Japanese porn films and seeing how much the women seemed to love dicks, I wanted to see uncensored. It shows on this site and I’m guessing on Fellatio Japan too. You see a lot of frenulum stimulation (thumb and tongue), the girls giggle and speak in Japanese with no subtitles. See, Zenra spoiled me with those subtitles. I have no idea what they’re saying, but they look happy and excited.
I would compare this directly to a site like Manojobs. It is shot from a POV camera of the man. Nearly half of the scenes have two Japanese women in them. There is plenty of female nudity and teasing too. Some of these models seem like they are just made for this type of porn from rubbing the dick to lightly blowing on it after letting a little saliva drip on the head. The eroticism is higher here than any handjob site I have seen.
I don’t know how much we are going to have to start taking into consideration the pandemic. This content is not only very good in action, but every video has up to 1080p resolution and the pictures are as big and clear as some of the top photo sites.
My favorite part between this site and other handjob sites is the way the models smile. I’m not trying to be negative about American models but we all have seen the look of anger or frustration from American models when trying to get the guy to cum. These Japanese models seem to like it the longer it takes.
I will probably end up trying Fellatio Japan just because this site has impressed me so much.
The only real complaint about the scenes is I would like to see all the models do the teasing with their body, not just with their hand. That’s about as minimal of a complaint as you can have.
There are 240 videos, just over 100 models, so that kind of gives you an idea of how many scenes have two models in them. A few of the models also have more than one scene.
I would recommend it to those who like handjobs, teasing, lots of smiles and seeing women who look to be very into the scene.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best, biggest and longest running (still active) hardcore sites.
- 1,641 scenes as of 1/20/2020, video and photo set included with each scene.
- The continued improvement of the navigation of all the DDF sites is seen here as well.
- 847 models and the majority of them are European glam models crossing over into the world of hardcore.
- They go much more hardcore than I think most porn fans realize with over 350 DP scenes and 850 anal scenes. Those DP scenes are the vaginal and anal DP, not the vaginal and oral DP.
- Updates 4 times per week.
- Very high technical quality (see bottom line)
- No download limits and videos and photos are downloadable.
- Navigation feature that allows you to search by year which dictates the video/technical quality. Very impressive but simple feature other sites should look into.
- Bills through Vendo.
Cons:
- Some of the male talent is annoying and I do think that's a con since a lot of scenes are 2 guys on 1 woman.
- The oldest content needs to be remastered.
Bottom Line:
DDF is still my choice as the best network on the internet. They have real standalone sites that they give you full access to all of them with a network subscription.
Hands on Hardcore was never a favorite DDF site. Usually when dealing with hardcore the only thing that really interests me is who the female model or if it's a unique niche of hardcore. Hands on Hardcore has both of those. There are models here that were once known as sweet and innocent, panty sliders, light masturbation and now they're in the middle of two men dual penetrating them. That makes it an unusual niche since it's not what you're used to seeing from these models.
The navigation here should be a model for other networks. It's not like this is a newer network either. They have worked very hard to make these sites work just like the standalone sites they are. Most networks don't do that. If you're on Hands on Hardcore and click model list, you get the model list just for the models on Hands on Hardcore. If you click a tag on Hands on Hardcore you get just the Hands on Hardcore scenes with that tag in them.
I mentioned the feature that lets you search by year. A lot of sites do that but they have their years grouped by video quality. Watch how nice this is, years 2011-2020 (Full HD), these have 1080p, 720p, 540p and 360p. Years 2006-2010 (HDV), these have 720p, 540p and 360p.
That alone tells us there are 15 years of updates with HD quality. They also have 4 years of archive content, some of it has 720p, the very oldest scenes are split into 4-5 parts and that's the ones that need to be merged and remastered but it's less than 50 scenes.
These scenes average right at 30 minutes each. Some I have seen are as short as 20 minutes, there are some in the 40-45 minute range.
The photo sets are very good, are downloadable in zips and I want to say they're not screencaps. Old BTS videos from DDF showed hardcore scenes being photographed separately from the videos and they start with the model fully clothed with a 5-20 photo tease in her clothes. The pictures then show the sex. The photos are available in small, medium and large downloads. The large ones top out at 4000 long end.
The content itself is hardcore. There's no light touching or soft music and to me it's as good as any non-extreme hardcore site. The guys can be annoying. For one, very few speak good English and for two, they're robotic. In some ways that could be a good thing since it allows the focus of the action to be on the woman but when she's 120 pounds and the guys are 220 pounds each it's not exactly easy to see her or focus on her.
There's also an advanced search that would take up all my characters to explain. It has clothing types (more than 20), location (more than 20), action (more than 50), toy type (more than 10) and model type, includes hair color, boob size, eye color, body art, skin color, natural or enhanced boobs and nationality (35 of those).
I did find a few of the actions worth mentioning: Dripping Icicle, Titty Twins and Biting.
Even though it's not my favorite DDF site this site is either the best hardcore standalone site I've been on or it's not far behind. I did notice in the actions it even has Double Vaginal, only 4 of those but it still continues my belief this is not what people expect from a DDF site and that's what makes it good. DDF has long been one of the greatest softcore, glam, solo, passionate lesbian producers then out of nowhere comes this site that looks like it belongs on an American network.
I wouldn't recommend it by itself. The whole network is usually available for a cheaper price than the standalone sites are and as you have read earlier in this review, the navigation is so good it's like having multiple standalone sites. You do have to login on each site. That's a common problem with someone makes a network out of previous standalone sites. The navigation gets messy and you never feel like you're seeing all the content of whichever site you're looking at.
The real compliment is I would rate it as only my 5th or 6th favorite DDF site but based on quantity, quality, navigation, this is a site that's near the top of its genre.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- HD Videos of some very good hardcore action
- Price has dropped to a reasonable $29.95, probably was reasonable at $39.95 considering the quality and quanity of content.
- Covers nearly all niches that are expected from DDF, b/g, anal, blowjob, group. Great group one that has Lucky in it!
- Very nice big pictures in zipped files
- Most of your favorite Euro models are here and some have as many as 5-10 movies each
Cons:
- Not much, maybe a little nitpicking that the site isn't quite as good for me personally as 1byday, DDF's all-around site.
- The older videos that are segemented are probably the only true complaint
Bottom Line:
The first thing I thought when I downloaded a HD video from here was, "This is very similar to Hardcore Fridays on 1byday". I was reminded again that though I like Hardcore as much as the next guy, I seem to prefer the solo aspects. Don't take that wrong, I think this is one of the best hardcore sites I have ever been on. DDF is rarely going to put out a product that isn't high quality.
Having said that, I prefer 1byday. I don't think DDF minds which one I like though, as long as I like one of them! One of the things that I like about this site is that if I'm in a mood for something hardcore, I don't have to try and find it. There are some truly hardcore sex scenes on here. None of the vanilla, ooh, ooh, ooh stuff. I'm talking legs spread, man going as fast as possible and a puddle of sweat on the bed or floor.
Though I am 100% straight, I do have to say that DDF gets some of the best men to do these women. Which as any porn fan knows is important because we have all seen the Ron Jeremy clips were the women look like they are going to puke. The women in these videos look geniunely enthused and horny. Which is probably the most important part for any hardcore site. Keep in mind, many of these models are also glamour models. The one thing I miss is the machine videos from 1byday. And the overall variety of 1byday.
Even so, this site is highly recommended for hardcore fans. You get around 600 videos, over 50,000 pics and around 10 updates per month. Great site!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hardcore site that doesn’t stray from its name.
- Weekly updates.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max)
- Professional models and production.
- 818 scenes, each with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set (see cons)
- The models are all attractive but no amateurs that I have noticed.
- Tags on every scene and they are accurate with added filters for more customization.
Cons:
- It is a Gamma site, it seems like the subscriptions change daily. One day they are streaming-only, the next day they have downloads and streaming included. I waited for the downloads and streaming.
- The scenes can be repetitive, not quite cookie-cutter, but there’s not a lot of variety or story.
Bottom Line:
Hard X is a site that does most everything right except sometimes it’s too professional. The porn landscape has changed over the last decade. These sites stacked with often-used professional male and female actors and actresses are not as common. Maybe that makes the feeling of too professional more noticeable? The newest scene has Mick Blue, Liv Revamped and Ramon Namor, all are big names, all are very good at what they do but I do feel like I know what they’re going to do from seeing them in a lot of scenes similar to this Dual Penetration scene.
Is that really something to complain about? It is sex after all. I guess if they started playing cards and no one got naked or had sex, that would be something to complain about too. This is a very large site. I don’t know when Gamma took this site and it’s sister sites over but the use of the site and features are very good. The navigation can be used to search from newest scene to oldest. You can use the tags, most scenes list as many as 30 tags. When you use a tag, it then brings in the option of using filters to narrow down your tag search. It is all easy to use and there’s a clean layout too.
The technical quality is very good. The last two years of updates have 4K option on the videos. You also can download the videos starting at 160p up to 1080p on all 808 scenes. The photo sets are downloadable and have a 1920x1280 resolution on the photos. The tags are useful enough I can tell you there are 73 dual penetration scenes, 95 double blowjob, 417 anal and 89 threesomes out of the 808 scenes. I believe the pairing of this site with Gamma was a major step-up for this site and has allowed it to become of the best navigating and least frustrating sites I’ve used.
The action itself is where you or I even may have some problems. The threesomes or more are very good. The one on one male/female scenes are the ones that tend to become redundant and repetitive, even nearing cookie-cutter. They do advertise their scenes as gonzo. Most gonzo porn is nearing cookie-cutter. I do wonder how much the professional models add or detract from the scenes? This seems like it’s Mick Blue’s 1,008th time doing DP. He has to start getting the feeling of he’s been there before and that risks “going through the motions”. The interesting part about this site is it does come with four other sites. These sites are having the same possible positive/negative effect on each other. The sites each have a theme so you won’t likely find that theme on this site.
I do believe if you’re a fan of hardcore porn and professional models, you will be pleased with this site’s offerings and its added ease of use, the high technical quality, along with clean layout (only one ad at the bottom of the page), makes it an even more attractive option in the cluttered world of hardcore porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Comes with the Ron Harris studio site, if you didn't read that review, you can get both sites for 2 months for $40.
- Another near 400 photo shoots from the world famous photographer, high res pictures that nearly every set has at least 2000 high end, some upwards of 4000 high end
- Zips files and fast downloads, must be separate server than the studio site or just not as many people downloading from this one.
- The videos the site has are minimum 600 high end, good fast 3000 bitrates
- When added together with the studio site makes for one very impressive package overall
Cons:
- Probably should just be merged with the studio site.
- Has less than 10 videos, it is almost all a photo site
- This site couldn't be a standalone site, by itself, it would maybe be worth a 1 time join for 10 bucks
- Slight navigation frustration with the pictures opening in a new window. I am used to clicking back button, not close button. So when on other sites after being on this one, will accidentally close the window/site.
Bottom Line:
As you can see, this should never be considered a standalone site. It is very basic 400 or so photo sets, 10 videos, you can download the whole site in a day, or a few hours if sitting at the computer.
The good thing is, it is offered with the Ron Harris Studio site, which I also reviewed, if interested in the package. When you combine the two, you end up with nearly 1,000 photo sets and around 130 videos total. That makes for one really good site to me.
Quality is similar from site to site, pictures as large as 4000 high end, with around 95% of sets having at least a 2000 high end option. The videos on this site are not as good as the ones on the studio site, in resolution or actual content.
Models continue to be some of the finest in the world, what do you expect from a Playboy photographer? Just don't expect to see any amateur girls here and expect to see plenty of glam, if that is your thing, like me. There is a nice blend between the sites of models, American models, some Euros too, I think Ron has a thing for Sandra Shine. There is a good collection of Sandra here on this site.
I will say that this site will remind you somewhat of Viv Thomas' site. The photo sets are not packed with 200 pictures, most have 70-100 in each set and I really believe these guys do that to tell a story with their pictures, so you don't see 2 poses that are nearly identical.
This site makes for a really nice bonus to the studio site, and I recommend, but be sure to join through the Ron Harris site and get this as a bonus, by itself, it is $30 a month, you can get both by joining through Ron Harris for $40 for 2 months.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some truly exotic locations and even more so exotic models. (See con)
- Picture dominated site, newer sets are massive in size, great quality all the way around.
- TBP price is really good, I was on here last year, and it was $35, TBP is $19.95.
- Buy a year long membership for $99.95 and get a Hegre special art print worth $300 autographed by Petter.
- I'm getting above average download speeds from USA.
Cons:
- Despite the gorgeous exotic models, there are also some really plain, need to be fed models.
- Videos aren't very good. The quality isn't that good and even worse, most of the action is tame.
- I could see this site becoming boring after awhile, most of the settings, though exotic have the same colors and become repititive
- Some of the posing is pointless. It really takes the "Art" part very seriously.
- Navigation is a little iffy, best word I can think of to describe it.
Bottom Line:
I've been on here one time before, about a year ago, and paid the full price of $35. It kind of turned me against the site since I definitely didn't think it was worth $35. With the new price with the TBP discount, there is now some worth to the site. I like this site better than Met-Art. Met-Art is just too far into the extreme softcore for my tastes, Hegre at least has some content that keeps my interest.
The women in general are beautiful. I like most all exotic women, and Hegre has plenty of the slim, but busty ones that are probably from the Russian Federation. The locations are great, but the locations become repetitive. I'm starting to think we are asking too much of these sites.
The pictures alone are worth joining for a month, but if you are a video fan, this site is not for you. I enjoy looking at pictures that are artsy, but not videos that are artsy. The quality of the movies isn't very good either, you are getting maybe average at best. It is one of those sites that you think one thing is great, another is bad. I do believe the large amount of content, daily updates, and quality of picture sets makes it a good one month join.
I'm on a 10M connection and get 1,200 kb/s on downloads which makes grabbing all I will want in a month really easy. I honestly can't say that I plan on keeping more than maybe 5 of the videos though. If you're into glam, give it a try, it has that much needed wow factor and will give you $20 worth of pictures.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- More of a softcore site, but not as soft as it used to be and has some of the prettiest models in the world on it.
- Good handling of signing up, cancelling, as it's part of Met-Art's network and uses the same cancelling method as Met-Art.
- 2-3 updates per week depending on the week, this nearly landed in cons, but will explain in BL.
- Excellent navigation, uses the same or similar site format and style as the other Met-Art sites.
- Very good download speeds, right around 80% of my max which is what I get consistently on Met-Art sites.
- Good for photo collectors! That almost gets two pros just because it's so rare to see these days. I'll further this in BL too.
- Some rare slightly harder than softcore sets of models who are more known for just softcore.
- I think this applies across the Met-Art network sites, everything is high-quality.
Cons:
- So, you like amateur models who aren't glam? This probably isn't the site for you.
- Picture sets can be on the small side, not resolution, but amount of photos in each. And the membership I signed up for is only offering 720p on the videos. Not for sure if there's another level that has higher. If there is, I haven't seen it.
- You might run into a feeling of "seen that, saw that" as you go from scene to scene.
- Could be clearer about the biller. I had a charge on my bank card from this site, but hadn't heard of the biller and thought it was fraudulent.
Bottom Line:
A confession: I have had the biggest crush on Lana Lopez for nearly a decade, also known as, Next Door Lana. I was looking through my old content of her and found a video from her own site that's no longer around. It was branded Holly Randall, so I joined for that very reason. A search on their site said they had more content of her and it's the closest I've seen Lana do to even masturbation (not counting those newer scenes or In The Crack).
Getting that content, including the photo sets too, would have been enough to make me a happy customer. As I looked at Lana's pictures, I decided to go look at some of the other models. Much like the top photo sites, this site has very clear, high-resolution photos that are shot in beautiful locations and settings. They also have quite a few of their models starting out in regular clothes or a bikini. It's becoming a lost art so they get a bonus 5 points for that.
The update schedule threw me off. And I'm still going to say it's a little inconsistent. It doesn't help that I'm a dyslexic American and they use the UK way of listing dates with the day first instead of the month. But there is inconsistency in the updates. The month of October had 10 updates, but there was a no-update period of 5 days in the middle of the month.
Then they released a Halloween set of one of my all-time favorite models Veronica Rodriguez and all was forgiven! Didn't even realize she's still active.
My recommendation of this site would depend on several things. Photos are a big enough part of this site that some updates are just photos. There's some b/g content, but it's not that common. I would estimate 20-25% at most. The majority of the content is solo pretty women masturbating. With a catch, this is common across all sites that have solo masturbation, a lot of it is very mechanical feeling.
Then I stumbled on a set with Gina Valentina in it and all was forgiven! Dear lord, where did they find her? Can I move there? I seriously found a new model to collect. Not for sure how "new" she is, but I hadn't ever seen her and she's the first one I've added to my collecting folder in 2 years. They do something else here that I usually only say about In the Crack, the women here look better here than on other sites. An example is Uma Jolie, who I've considered collecting, but changed my mind, the content here makes her stunning.
That's a big plus here. Even if you prefer amateur models and I'm probably 50/50 now myself, there are some really pretty women on here.
My biggest complaint which was only mentioned a little in the cons is the size of photo sets, same with the videos, they're fairly short. That's one of those "it's not really a con since I'm just wanting more of what I see" but since we don't have on-demand porn subscriptions to request to see more of a set, that's a slight con eventually.
Then I saw Karlee Gray, Aubrey Sinclair and Val Dodds. I'm not going to say it again, but I forgot the cons.
It could be that I'm not joining as many sites these days or it could be that I join sites that don't have these newer models on them, but I found multiple models that I started "collecting" folders for.
Technical quality is very high on photos, not as good on videos.
Pictures are downloadable and newer ones are in the 6000 long end range.
Videos for me have 720p option, 360p option and a mobile option. I joined with a normal membership and don't remember there being an option to join a 1080p version, not that I would have since I prefer 720p, but it's worth mentioning since some of the updates being photo sets will already irritate those who like videos only.
Over 300 models, which I think is a little low and might show that they're selective. Most of the models I've like have multiple photo sets and videos.
Roughly 700 videos and 600 photo sets. I should mention here that Holly Randall is the daughter of Suze Randall, a legendary name in porn. Holly, herself, has sets on here as well. Kind of adds a different feel to it since she also is a photographer on the site.
Which I think leads to how I feel about the site. I think with Holly's direction these models, the photo sets, the videos, have very high tease and "slip" photos like Amia Miley, who I thought was long gone from porn, in a bikini and in one photo the bikini has slid over. There's a lot of that here and it's good for me. They even have a tag for "striptease". Sometimes, doing less is more.
Great site overall, but certainly not for everyone. If you're a video lover, you might still like this site, but the best content, on this site, to me are the pictures. I honestly liked it better than I thought I would since my original reason to join was to just grab the Lana Lopez content.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
