Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An interesting twist on porn sites for the future.
- Content from 75 non-related sites, I'm going to estimate the average site has 15 videos on here.
- It covers 89 different categories including most niches/categories I can think of.
- A total of 877 models, mix of pros and amateurs.
- There's a big con coming but I believe it's offset by the low price and variety, a full month is $9.95.
- Navigation is excellent for this type of site. You can sort by site, model or category.
- Video player works well.
Cons:
- No downloads. I will go into this into the bottom line and why I'm not making too big of a deal over it.
- While streaming-only is becoming a little more popular these days there are people who don't have fast enough connections to stream without going through a half-dozen buffering moments per scene. I didn't have that problem but it is one of the downsides not often mentioned with stream-only sites.
Bottom Line:
Normally, a stream-only site wouldn't appeal to me. I have joined sites that have stream-only but allow you to upgrade to a download version of the site. This one doesn't allow that but I do think the very low price makes it acceptable.
The big plus here is you're getting content from 75 sites. One of the sites only has 1 scene, one only has 3, the rest have at least 5, while some have over 50 and a few even have over 100. The majority fall in that 10-20 range. It's kind of like getting a trial to 75 sites for $9.95.
I think a site like this could be good for porn. A few sites I consider to be polarizing sites that people either love or hate that have content here: Amateur Allure, Analized, Brutal X, Disgrace That Bitch, Fister Twister, German Castings, Lederhosen Gangbang, Make Him Cuckold, Sell Your GF and VIPissy.
Those, to me, are sites that most people aren't going to blindly join just based on the premise of the sites. It's a situation where a person might watch a few scenes and decide they might like it more than they realized or they might watch a few scenes and realize they hated it even more than they thought they would. This helps with cutting back on unhappy customers, showcasing different niches than people would normally try and it might introduce people to porn they otherwise would ignore. I believe VIPissy falls into that category as much of any of the sites do. It has a niche that is popular but isn't likely going to pull new people away from their other favorite niches to it. Now, they can see what their content is like as it is a regularly high ranking site, even by those not directly into pissing porn.
The other sites to me are not that polarizing in type of content as much as it is that people might not know the site well and won't take a chance on a full membership. Sites like Young Sex Parties, X-Sensual, Spandex Porn, She is Nerdy, Spanish Sluts (with nearly 200 videos on here), Summer Hookups, Julie Skyhigh, I Kiss Girls, a longtime favorite of mine Mano Jobs has 44 scenes here, Lisa Ann, Flexi Dolls and going to mention it here too, Amateur Allure and a large collection from the Puffy Network.
It's like an advertising site for 75 sites you might only know 10 of.
I will say I think they have to keep that price at $9.95, that's not a promo as far as I know, it's the regular price. When I reviewed In the Crack, I even talked about how their $9.95 streaming-only membership was a good option for those that didn't know much about the content. I feel the same way here except it's 75 sites that cover 88 categories.
This is, to me, the type of streaming-only site that I would welcome more of. I think that's the whole problem with a single site or network with similar content being streaming-only. There's not enough diversity in the content like this site has.
Even as long as I've been reviewing sites and as many sites as I have joined, I only knew of about half of these sites. This would really be an ideal place for a newcomer to porn to start. Or for someone like me that believes there's very little unique being produced in today's porn market. They even introduced me to a site called Fuck on Street, which TBP scored low in 2014 but introducing me to it introduced me to the network it's on which I had never heard of called, "Extreme Movie Pass".
I see that as progressive thinking. To get me interested in a niche site which led to me being interested in an entire network. Some of us are content with a site only having 30-40 scenes we download and keep ... if it fits a niche we are really into and that is the strength here. I can't go higher on the score than I am just because I am viewing this site as a nice preview of 75 sites to see if I can find any new sites I'm interested in but the key is the $9.95 price.
I would recommend it especially for newcomers since you're going to see most niches here and maybe you'll find a new fetish. I recommend it for those that say they are bored with the porn they have been watching and want something different.
Very unique concept they have here and I'm giving a good score for the amount of coverage their site is giving to different sites/categories/fetishes and for the value.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- For me, the best handjob site on the internet (Manojob) with two other so-so sites.
- Good navigation, seamlessly move between the sites.
- Decent blend of models, most are younger and white but there is enough diversity not to count it against them.
- Active and helpful webmaster, didn't have any problems this time but have in the past. Responds fast and is courteous.
- Manojob wins me over with this network especially with the "pussy tease" scenes. That's one of my more recent fetishes and they do it well.
- Rocketgate as the biller is back in pros for now. They made me email to cancel recently but the most recent cancel was automated so maybe it was just a glitch.
Cons:
- It's a tough con to hit them with but there is recycling and I understand why. I will explain in BL.
- Mr POV and The Dick Suckers haven't interested me. Take that more as a compliment towards Manojob.
- Updates are no longer dated, three of the four first listed scenes on Manojob are scenes I already have.
Bottom Line:
My apologies to MarcDC. I had already planned on reviewing this network as it has one of my favorite sites in it, Manojob. I normally wouldn't post a review of the same site as someone else on the same day but I don't think our reviews are that far apart either.
Manojob was the first handjob site I remember joining. Before that I would go to Videobox or some other DVD site and download their handjob DVDs. At first, Manojob didn't do a lot to separate itself from the DVDs but over time they started working the pussy tease in, some call it the cameltoe slide.
Mr. POV is an okay site. Anything in gonzo style these days starts to become repetitive to me. The Dick Suckers same problem. They're average sites if that makes it fair.
In the cons I mentioned that there is recycling. I understand that these guys are a small team. They have times where they're filming and can't knock out brand new updates every other day or even every week so they rotate and older, popular scene in as a new update. I'm not going to take off points for it. I'm familiar enough with this site, their webmaster, that I know he busts his ass trying to get quality content up.
The problem for me is scenes get removed to use as new updates. Rear Admiral reviewed the site in 2015 with 1,400+ scenes, TBP reviewed it in 2017 with 1,307 scenes, I reviewed it in 2017 and there was only 1,266 scenes. I made note that the month I reviewed it in had 31 updates in 30 days. This is one of those situations where the webmaster is a nice enough guy if he would just put everything back up and say he could only get 2-4 updates a month, I think it would look better. We know he's not a major production studio and we appreciate the hard work to keep up.
Still not taking points off for it but as of today, 3/17/2020, there are 1,273 scenes. That's 6 more scenes than when I reviewed it 2.5 years ago.
Manojob is still the best handjob site, tease site, in porn.
The scenes are not as basic as they used to be. They've incorporated JOE or JOI, Jerk Off Encouragement and Jerk Off Instruction. The women don't just kneel down and jerk the guy off like old handjob sites did. They now get naked, half-naked, and grind their bodies against the guy's dick. You'll even get a few slipped in penetrations. Those parts are what puts them ahead of everyone else. I'm not even for sure it's that close.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, 1080p, they also have the cumshot only video, a SD version, a mobile version and interview with each model.
I'm going to tell you the scene to watch to see the eroticism handjob porn can have, Teanna Trump, Class of 2014. They should have paid her 10x what they did and I don't know what they paid her.
The downside as I said the last time I reviewed the whole network is I don't see the other two sites coming close to that type of eroticism. They're doing something very rare with the Manojob content. It makes the other two sites feel very plain.
I'm raising my score quite a bit from the last time I reviewed the whole network. That's because the network as a whole frustrated me the previous time I reviewed it. I was frustrated with the disappearing videos. I'm going as high as I can go for the network just because I don't know how much new content they are putting out. They have around 10 4K scenes according to their tag search. If they keep up the Manojob updates and keep working on that erotic part, maybe I would go a little higher.
It would be my first choice recommendation to someone into tease and handjobs just because of Manojobs. Some people would add more for the other two sites. I have never downloaded anything from either. I have watched a few scenes to see if I thought it was worth a download.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's a network that's not really a network that has one of the internet's top handjob sites in it.
- Includes 3 sites, Mano Job, The Dick Suckers (really, people?) and Mr POV. At least we know they're not using their creative juices for site names. There's also bonus scenes from Amateur Allure and Fucked Hard 18.
- Download speeds are good, 75% of my max.
- Most scenes include pictures and they are downloadable. There's also various options on the videos including "bra busting" clip and "cumshot only".
- Navigation is excellent. Well, kind of, it will make more sense as you read through.
- Mano Job has been around for 10+ years. It was the first handjob site I saw that used the "pussy tease", a very important part for me.
- Rocketgate as biller, I've had no problems with them, but do get annoyed by them remembering me and trying to use my sign-up information from 2012. Cards expire!
- No real ads, some live cams from within the site, no cross-sales.
Cons:
- I'm going to get this one out of the way. Handjob porn isn't for everyone and I'll explain in the BL what it is that I like about it and even for me, it gets very repetitive.
- The damning one, though it's not hurting my score since there's still a lot of content here. They're recycling content and my guess is they have been for awhile. I think some of it might be remastered when they recycle it, but one of the newest scenes is of Aliana Love, who hasn't shot porn since 2014. There will be more in the bottom line.
- Supposed download limit, I tested it as good as I could, downloaded 76 GB in 7 hours, didn't hit a limit, so this isn't so much a con as it is a reminded that they do say they have a download limit.
Bottom Line:
Why would I call a network, a network that's not really a network? Because I was a member of Mano Job way back in 2010 and it included The Dick Suckers and Mr. POV. Finishes the Job is nothing more than a hub that brings all the content of those three sites together. It did wonders for the navigation, but this is pretty much the same thing as joining Mano Job and getting the other two sites with it. I don't know, maybe that's a little questionable since Finishes the Job before signing up looks like another full site to go along with those other three.
What's not questionable is the content count. I was shocked when I first opened the site. They have 31 updates in November 2017, that's more than 1 per day. I hadn't realized Finishes the Job even exists. I was just looking at Mano Job as a join to get some old content I no longer have. This really isn't a negative review as the score shows, but I'm going to show the numbers:
RearAdmiral reviewed this site in 2015 and listed 1,400+ scenes.
Mbaya reviewed this site in 2016 and listed 1,452 scenes.
Xander of TBP reviewed this site in March of 2017 and there was 1,308 scenes.
Here I am in late November 2017, a month that has seen 31 updates in 21 days and the total is 1,266.
Ahem.
Maybe things are a little questionable. I know one scene is recycled, it's one of the newest updates and it's of Aliana Love, who hasn't shot porn since 2014. I'm guessing these sites are also owned by the people who own Fucked Hard 18 and maybe even Amateur Allure too. There's a phantom site Finishes the Job and 200 less scenes than 2015, but I still think it's a very good site.
The navigation is very simple. They've combined the content into one area. Four rows of four scenes per page, 79 pages. Over on the left toolbar you can pick to just see Mano Job site scenes or any of the other sites, including Amateur Allure and Fucked Hard 18.
Handjob porn appealed to me back 10 years ago or so. I saw a handjob scene with Brianna Beach in it. She was already one of the best, most believable porn stars, but that scene pushed her over the top. The enjoyment she showed, the arousal she had, it was bad enough that she was asking for the scene to be a sex scene because she was so turned on. That's what handjob porn offers me. You can watch half or more of these scenes and the models look downright bored. Some even look like they're watching a television off the screen. The other models, they look more aroused and more excited than in even their hardcore scenes.
Mano Job does a good job of this. As mentioned, they were the first to do the pussy tease handjob and it's always fun to watch those because it teases many of the female models more than it is the male. That's very rare in porn. The woman being teased.
It's not going to be possible to say when they started releasing 1080p videos since they're recycling, but I would estimate at least half of the scenes have 1080p, don't hold me to that, but I've went back halfway through the pages and there's still a 1080p option.
That excellent navigation might hurt them even more. It's making it easy to see that they are cram-updating. I remember other sites doing this back a few years ago, they would remove 100 and release them over a month as new.
I still can't help but laugh over the names of the sites, did somebody really say, "The Dick Suckers"? Mano Job is the "star" here and the main draw. There's been mixed reports on the DL limit, Xander mentions in his TBP review that there's no DL Limit, but it does show up in their TOS, it just isn't active from the best I can tell.
Look at this as an archive site. The content is good, even if it's repetitive. Good quality, excellent navigation, little to no ads, no cross sales, it's hard to be too hard on them as being dishonest when they're not taking advantage of multiple cross sales and dozens of ads. If I was going to offer advice it would be to put all the content back on it and just let the content sell itself. Nearly all handjob and CFNM sites have gone under.
And that's how I will recommend it, for those who like handjob content or POV content, I don't particularly care for Mr POV or The Dick Suckers, but the content is typical on those sites. Even though I would recommend it to those who like handjob content, I will only do so on a one-month basis. I won't be back after this month. Which I think is sort of a strength for an archive site. You can get everything you want in a month and know there's no more new content coming out. Last, as far as I can tell, this is exclusive content, but I want to mention again the bonus site content, specifically Fucked Hard 18, the blue room that's used in nearly every Fucked Hard 18 scene is also used occasionally on Mano Job.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The one site in this group of sites that doesn't focus on one main model, instead focusing on point of view style hardcore scenes.
- Quality is really good. Scenes are in standard HD quality 1280x720, three downloadable options, WMV, AVI and FLV.
- Wasn't expecting photo sets, but they have a photo set with every scene and these photo sets are not just screencaps, if they are, they've got a trick camera! The pictures are good quality as well, up to 2300 long end resolution and come zipped.
- Updates regularly, averages out to once a week with a video and photo set. I do think the content is exclusive too.
- Simple navigation of clicking "scenes" then just going through them.
- For a POV site, the cameraman does a pretty good job of filming. I didn't get seasick.
- Comes with four solo model sites with the Jessica Jaymes one being the best of the sites.
Cons:
- Not a lot bad here, the site isn't real big, but they are updating. When Spencer reviewed it for the TBP review, he listed 26 scenes, they are now up to 47.
- Probably a little sharing with the Jessica Jaymes site, there are sets here that have Jessica in them and those also appear on her site.
- If you're not careful you will miss the photo sets since they are listed as "HD gallery" on each scene. Not really a con, but thought I would mention it in case anyone joins and misses the photos.
Bottom Line:
This is a bonus site that comes with four other solo model sites. In trying to be fair, I've reviewed each of those since they didn't have any current active reviews on them. Three of the solo sites are okay if you're a fan of the model, nothing spectacular though. Jessica Jaymes solo site is very good. As a whole, this group of sites is recommended and especially recommended for fans of Jessica.
This site First Class POV is good. The models are top-tier, from Tiffany Brookes to Brandy Aniston to Annie Cruz to an old favorite London Keyes to one of my all-time favorites Mariah Milano.
The quality here is also very good, all 47 scenes are shot in 1280x720. Looking at the update schedule, they have averaged right at one scene (picture set and video) per week. The site's first update was on 9/26/10, the newest update is 9/15/11 and there are 47 scenes, so there were a few that were a day or two off, but weekly seems to be the standard they are going for now.
Some of the content is shared within the group of sites, but I'm going to estimate it's at 10% or less.
It's hard to find much fault in a site that has HD videos and nearly 2500 long end zipped photo sets. It's even harder to find fault if you're a fan of the solo models they have, making this a really nice bonus site.
I should mention that my download speeds on all these sites has been very high. The POV content ranges from some just being blowjobs, others being full sex and the filming is better than the average POV scene.
Overall, it's a good POV site that just needs some growth in amount of content to match its very good quality of videos and photos. Recommended as a bonus site to those solo model sites, but wouldn't just recommend it to POV only fans since you would be paying $30 for 47 scenes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site about fit women in fitness clothes, including exercising, then having sex.
- My membership includes full access to Sexy Hub network and a MILF channel which I've not found yet.
- Content is 100% exclusive and downloads are allowed, I was concerned it would be one of those sites that asked for more money for downloads but it allows downloads up to 1080p.
- Picture sets with each scene and are downloadable.
- If you just stay on this site, the navigation is simple and easy but once you venture out the Sexy Hub network things get a little confusing.
- I think this niche is underrated. I guess it depends on the viewers geographical area but I see women wearing leggings, athletic clothes, everyday.
- One that might slip by, if it has a clothing niche, the models don't start nude.
- Updates like clockwork, once a week with a video and photo set, site still only has 104 scenes on it as of 5/1/2018.
- Models are very attractive.
Cons:
- Hello ads. When you first login it tries to upsell you a deal, then each time you return to the homepage an ad pops up for 15,000 scenes for $1. Computer programmers have learned how to make the ads "not really" pop-ups so the pop-up blocker won't catch it.
- There's a certain level of cookie-cutter here.
- DL speeds are inconsistent for me. One downloaded at 14mbps, then 3mbps, then 8mbps, then 1mbps. I rarely run into a DL speed problem, so I will see if it straightens up over the next few weeks.
- MBI/Probiller, whether unfair to list them as a con is debatable but I find their canceling process to be annoying (call, email or chat)and it has to be done 3 days before the end of your membership.
Bottom Line:
I had considered joining this site quite a few times in the past. I knew it's a smaller site and knew it's a specific niche but this is one of my favorite niches. I didn't know until I joined that it comes with access to the Sexy Hub network which has some good sites on it too.
My biggest concern was that the videos required further payment to download but they don't. Each video has 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p download options. The 1080p have 6000 bitrate and the 720p have close to 3000 bitrate. The videos are very good technical quality and because of the nature of the content you'll see a lot of brightly colored clothes and backdrops.
I don't know what's going on with the download speed but do think it's just a glitch, possibly on my side, I just downloaded another scene to see how the speed is doing and it's up to 14mbps. That's 80-90% of my max so I'll keep an eye on it to see if the inconsistency returns.
What you're getting here is content of a workout room, gym, fitness club. There are scenes with men and women, usually the typical "gym" scene of the guy training the woman then he lets his hand slide across her butt and then it becomes normal porn, again. I find it fun and kind of humorous to try and guess when the sexual grab happens. You also have lesbian scenes and some of these do try to be more aggressive/dominant but overall it's mostly tame.
It's my way of saying the biggest reason you should join this site is if you're like me and like seeing pretty, fit, young women in their exercise clothes before getting nude. The themes of the scenes don't change much. I haven't watched every scene but I keep wondering if I'm going to find one of a mixed group, maybe like a coed yoga class.
Then ... I saw a model who made me think of a young Eve Angel, her name is Vanessa Decker. They have 7 scenes with her in them and that helped the score a little. The models, from what I can tell, are mostly European which did surprise me and I haven't been a member of a European porn site in awhile, so they're all new to me.
I keep going back to the feeling that they're missing something with the lack of group scenes. One of the scenes, for example, has 8 women at the beginning. They are all dressed very skimpy and exercising in the class/group style. After a few minutes the "class" ends and 5 of the women disappear. Three stay and have sex. Even if those 5 just stayed around and watched, maybe masturbated, I think those type of scenes would be a major boost to this site.
The navigation on Fitness Rooms only is as basic and easy as possible to use. There are 5 pages of scenes, scroll through each page to get each scene. Picture tab is above the stream window. The pictures are very good but it's hard to tell if these are just screencaps from the video. It does look that way because the males are in the photos. If you start using the Sexy Hub network, you have to sign in again and they have quite a bit more content so it becomes harder to navigate. I expect in a few years, a lot of these smaller, newer networks will start combining all their niche sites with their networks.
There are 104 scenes, 136 models (since there are multiple models in many of the scenes) and I could sit here and name off favorites but nearly all 136 would be listed. In terms of model attractiveness, this site reminds me of the early to mid-2000s European boom of models. Add tight exercise clothes and you have a winner for me but it is admittedly, a less-enthusiastic winner than usual. It feels like they have a time limit they're trying to stay within in each video.
Still, I would recommend it for those who like pretty, fit, younger (18-24) models in tight clothes, attempting to convince you they are only there to exercise. I'll also note that when I was joining and saw the offer for an included membership to Sexy Hub that I looked at Sexy Hub and it offers the same deal by adding Fitness Rooms to their membership.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It plays to one of my biggest fetishes
- It also has some of the prettiest models around
- There is great softcore content including teasing and stripping
- Download speeds are good at 80% my max
- It’s similar to the old-school glam sites
- Good solo camerawork, seen most when the models’ make eye contact with the camera
Cons:
- It’s still way too quiet.
- The quietness all but ruins the production and realism for me.
Bottom Line:
I have had the dressing room fetish for a very long time. I used to stand, like most husbands, holding the bags, while their wife tried on clothes. Sometimes, my mind would drift off. I would wonder what that one woman looks like who was in the dressing room beside the dressing room my wife was in. Sure, it’s perverted but most fetishes are. I even progressed in the fetish by talking my wife and eventually,, a few future girlfriends, into sending me selfies from inside the dressing room. Yes, the girlfriends came after divorcing the first wife.
This fetish can be frustrating. Finding a dressing room where you and the other person are comfortable with sending nude or tease photos from is harder than you would expect. It can be done and be done with complete respect for anyone else in the store. That’s the biggest problem with Fitting Rooms. If these models really are in a fitting room, they must have a ton of respect for the other patrons. They’re quiet, there is little to no noise that comes with store dressing rooms, like hangers clanking, items being dropped, people chattering.
I wouldn’t have joined Fitting Room for a second time if not for their great models. Everything is there for this site to be one of my favorites, maybe even favorite. The videos can be downloaded and zipped photosets too. The scenes are reminiscent of early 2000s tease and solo scenes. The models even dance around inside the fitting room, but there’s missing noise. It lacks the ambiance of a dressing room.
I described it once before as it sounds like the models are standing inside a box.
It’s still not a complete waste. The models are still great. The site does not cater to a certain age or body type of models. You get a mix of models, ages and body types, which is exactly how a fitting room site should be. The model strips, sits down, complete quietness, slides her toy in her and lets out a huge moan. That’s not a realistic sound for someone masturbating in public. Women try to be quiet and do it quietly, which is one of the hottest parts since there will be times they can’t stop themselves from letting out a muffled moan. I can imagine all the potential problems with making the site and scenes the way I want them. I’m sure licensing fees would be needed for any copyrighted music and I’m not for sure how much money is available in the porn budget for random people chattering. That’s why I said it’s not a complete waste.
This is a fetish I have experience with and because of that, I have a standard that I believe the fetish should live up to.
I believe others could really enjoy this site. The models are some of the best I have seen and the women do seem to really enjoy the fitting room fetish. Just don’t approach it like me and expect the models to do what you want them to do. Maybe it’s better for me that the site doesn’t nail the fetish for me? Great site worth taking a look into.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of those niches I wish had more representation in porn.
- Very pretty models, they seem to be selective in the models.
- Updates have slowed over the last few months but they still have at least one new scene per week.
- Most models have multiple scenes, sets and outfits.
- Three download options on videos, 720p, 1080p and 4K.
- Downloadable photo sets, very high, professional quality.
- Various ages, doesn't seem to stick to any age group.
Cons:
- The last time I reviewed this site I gave a tip in it and they didn't listen. This is supposed to be women in a fitting room. There should be some noise or chatter. I was hoping they had fixed that but they haven't.
- Very little diversity in the models except for age. Nearly all models are white and slender.
- Needs a boost of oomph, scenes seem clinical at times.
Bottom Line:
As an admitted fetishist of dressing room porn, I honestly believe you could give me the controls of a site like this and I could make it into a top site.
Years ago, one of my exes would send me pictures from the dressing room in a store. It seriously became a near obsessive fetish of mine. I was the dumbass saying, "Go try on some more clothes" knowing I would have to pay for them if she liked them.
What that site is to me is a new twist on solo porn. For roughly half of the video the model changes clothes, poses, takes pictures of herself and this is supposed to be turning her on. After 10 minutes of this teasing, she sits down or sometimes stands and masturbates.
On that part of it they do fine. The dressing room part is mostly lost. These are critical to a scene playing to this fetish:
Outside noise. What good is it to masturbate in an indoor dressing room if you don't believe someone is just outside the door?
Attempted holding in of moans. There's none of that here. These women are moaning like they are in the privacy of their bedroom with no one within 1,000 ft of them.
Have them nude while opening the door. I do like that they vary the panties, the pantyhose, the outfits, and they have some really pretty models.
I think the easiest way to point out the biggest negative is it's like there is no thought or production. I think I described it before as the model is just sitting inside a box on a set. When you do fetish content, how believable it is, is very important.
The numbers show 153 scenes which is much higher than when I was last here and they only had 58. I don't like bashing the model choices but they started out this site with Apolonia and Lil' Caprice. They're still the two models I know on the site. Most of these other models are completely new to me but I'm sure they're not amateurs.
Their technical quality is as good as you can ask for. Every scene has 720p, 1080p and 4K resolution videos. The photos are almost 6000 long end and downloadable.
They're doing so much right it's just the content isn't as good as it could be. This comes across as a very softcore site but it's not. There's anal play, dildos, Magic Wands, it's moderate level or higher masturbation.
I think they would even be better off just forgetting the dressing room part. This is going to be a bad analogy but it's like a site calling itself shower masturbation. And the person gets in the shower without turning the shower on and masturbates.
You could probably say this is the exact type site that's not good for obsessive people. It's still a good, solo, panties, pantyhose, masturbation site with some of the best technical standards.
As far as I know there are two types of dressing room fetishes. One is what this site does. You get to watch what goes on in the dressing room. The other is, the risk, almost exhibitionism, taboo style and of course that would be the one I'm into.
I think my score is somewhat objective. I try to bring as much subjectivity to reviews as I can but I'm sure there's people into this and it's really good at what it does. I guess it's just not perverted enough for me. I'll continue to keep tabs on this site. I'm sure they will have to change things up eventually.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The first site I've known of that covers the "dressing room" fetish.
- The quality is very high, maybe the highest I've seen as an overall site but there's a con about this too.
- Some well-known models like Lil' Caprice but there are a few models here that I've never heard of and you'll see the big con but these particular "new" models to me were worth joining for.
- You're going to get three main fetishes here: Dressing Room, panties and a combination of tease/explicit masturbation that is kind of rare these days.
- Very good download speeds, thanks to my cable company, hitting 80% of my new 400M internet connection.
- One day this will be part of a network and it will be worth joining that network for.
- CCBill is the biller and they tried a cross sale for Sex Art.
- If you like the models and the fetishes, I think it's a good price for this site.
- Updates twice a week
Cons:
- The site is small. As of today, 9/11/2018, they have 58 videos, 58 photo sets and 30 "extras" photo sets that look to be fairly genuine in being true self-shot photos.
- I would like to see them do more with the dressing room fetish. At times it feels like I could be watching a common solo video of a model without even noticing the setting.
- The lost fetish, bottom line will explain.
Bottom Line:
I don't know if it's an age thing or if maybe it's more of a more recent trend (thanks, smartphones) but I have this strange, unusual fetish of women undressing in dressing rooms and doing more to themselves while in there. I say strange even though I think it's much more common these days. I have dated a few women recently who liked sending pictures from the dressing room. You know the way that goes, "Do you like this outfit? Is this cute on me? Am I too old to be wearing this?" Then 376 pictures later, "How about this?" And the clothes magically disappeared.
Maybe that's the appeal of this site to me, the tease lasts about half of the video (20-25 minutes long scenes). You know you're getting old when a woman is sending you pictures and you're replying, "I'm getting hungry! And no, not in a sexual way!"
This site is in one way, very basic. The navigation is very simple and works as it should. The technical quality is the best I've seen when it comes to 100% of the content having these specs:
The videos are downloadable in 3 sizes, 4K, 1080p and 720p. I still don't have a 4K monitor so I can't say how crisp or clear those are but the 720p are very crisp and clear to me.
The pictures are downloadable and start with the model dressed, some of the outfits are very pretty, almost like it's what the model chose to wear or like they have a wardrobe specialist. The pictures are nearly 6000 long end.
The site is almost painfully exclusive feeling. What I mean by that, it's like they have very serious standards for their models. They have 58 scenes (videos and photos) but only 20 models. Which is good if you're like me and found a few you hadn't seen before, most have multiple shoots and outfits. At this point, it looks like this site should be rated very high unless removing points for the small size of it.
But ... why make a niche site that is untouched for the most part and make production mistakes that all but ruin the niche? First video I watched, the model teases, she's stripping, good site for those into panties, she starts masturbating and starts moaning loudly and groaning and squealing. A woman wouldn't masturbate in a store dressing room and moan and groan loudly! It's like writing a classic novel only to forget to proofread it.
That moaning is annoying enough but the scenes are dead silent. This isn't really a dressing room, is it? It's a box on the set? Where's the soft background music we would hear in stores? What about people randomly talking? This niche has a ton of potential but hearing a model's heels echo in a hollow room isn't part of the potential. That's sad to me.
I once watched an amateur that recorded herself masturbating in a dressing room. She was nearly biting her lip off to stop from moaning but someone bumped the door or went in the dressing room beside her and it aroused her, so a small moan slipped out. There's the potential. Something that makes this content look like it's a horny woman but not porn. Maybe I'm asking too much but anything to make scenes more than just basic masturbation scenes that are shot in the same room. I love to use my imagination when viewing porn but these production errors do make it almost too hard to imagine.
What saves them, besides the technical quality, are the models. I downloaded the content of 17 of the 20 models. Even found one model I'm not familiar with that I am going to have to look for, Apolonia Lapiedra, anyone that knows of more content of her let me know. She's engagement ring level.
I will also give them credit for not fudging the model's ages. Not that I know their ages but as mentioned, Lil' Caprice is here and instead of like most sites, she's not listed as 19, she's listed as 29. The youngest model on the site is 22, the oldest is 31. There is anal, vaginal masturbation but no sex, not even girl-girl. It's a girl and her toy in a box. Jill-in-the-box? Joking aside, I like this site for a one month join. They are updating twice a week but given that the videos are not that long, you will download most everything you want in a week (max). It's a very good, solo, panties, tease, masturbation site but every scene is in the box so I can't get the dressing room part out of my head.
I would recommend it for those who stand outside a dressing room and see a pretty woman walk in and start ignoring their wife asking them to get her a bigger size. If you're into "she would be that loud in public" (not your wife) then you'll love the content. I think panty fetishists also would enjoy this site. The scenes have roughly 10 minutes of tease at the beginning (formulaic?). For me the models made the site above average but that's really as far as I can go. Check the models out before joining and decide from there. Last, I did a similar of review of Fitness Rooms, with similar "problems" of the content just not being believable enough but it doesn't look like the sites are related.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Models feature some of the best known in the business, Sunny Leone, for example, to those unknowns that you wish you knew of!
- Has bonus access to 2 sites Cherry Petite and Squirt 4 Real
- Price is okay for one month join, would prefer to see $19.95 though
- Videos are 720 high end, bitrates need to improve only 1000
- Covers the different styles of porn from the very softcore to very hardcore on Squirt 4 Real
- DL speeds about average.
Cons:
- No zips, I should list that 3 times, maybe the zips would then appear like Candyman?
- Video bitrate of 1000 really is slow when running at 720 resolution.
- The only word I can think of is that the site is somewhat boring. I didn't go back for nearly 2 weeks after my first day of joining.
- Navigation can be annoying, open pictures in new window, close site on accident type annoying.
- The best looking models are either topless at best or not nude at all in underwear.
Bottom Line:
I couldn't help but laugh when on this site. The site looks very professional, but I thought to myself, "That professional look is to tease me so that I will accept the no zips" then when looking at the models, the most beautiful ones were pretty much tease shoots, so I guess they figured those would tease me enough that seeing the less attractive ones nude would be enough.
Quality on the videos is good, 720, but someone is going to have to explain to these sites that the higher the resolution, the higher the bitrate needs to be. 1000 is the bitrate and it seriously chugs along, maybe that is some sort of tease?
The videos on the main site Flashy Babes, could probably get away with a R rating. HBO After Dark type softcore. The videos on Squirt 4 Real are very X rated, not for sure if we still use XXX or not, but I would say XXX.
Besides the no zip problem, the pictures aren't very big, I found a few 1600 high end, but most are in the 1200 range. The videos are there in numbers with around 500, but a lot of them are just the photo shoot style videos.
Of course, on Squirt 4 Real, they only have around 30 videos.
The site that saves this package of sites is Cherry Petite. If you like to see young, very amateur models, this girl is for you. She has a few tattoos that she probably wishes she didn't have. She isn't a glam model at all. Doesn't have any plastic surgery and wears very little make-up. But she is seriously cute, and she does do full masturbation in the videos. She kind of reminds of me of a new Brooke Skye.
I wish they had more content just of her. With photo sets around 70 and the same for videos, her site alone was worth the price for me. Also, the Cherry Petite videos are 720 high end with 2000 bitrates. And those are worth downloading, all of them.
As a package, it is easy to recommend it. You get a full on tease site with Flash Babes, a full on hardcore site with Squirt 4 Real and you get a solo site of a very innocent looking woman that likes to masturbate in front of the camera. Recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some of the kinkiest porn I have ever watched
- Lots of fetishes from feet to bondage to machine manipulation.
- Pretty models for this type of porn. I don’t recognize them.
- Is another of the mini-networks from Porn Doe. Has 3 sites included with it.
- Segpay is the biller and they’ve helped me out of 3 problems in recent months.
- The look on my face while watching these scenes. Not to mention the newfound ways to use curse words.
- Good but small network to give you something different than what you’re used to.
Cons:
- It’s just very small with only 63 scenes across the 3 sites.
- This would be a really nice addition to any of the other Porn Doe mini-networks.
- Jokes on them, they have a 100 download limit on this network but it only has 63 scenes.
Bottom Line:
It takes a lot to get me to review a 63 scene network. If you haven’t read my other reviews about Porn Doe breaking their sites up into mini-networks that’s what this is. For Bondage consists of 3 sites, they are: Crowd Bondage with 25 scenes, Badtime Stories with 30 scenes and Special Feet Force with 8 scenes. None of these sites have updated since around the time Coronavirus arrived. It’s a mini-network like this one that makes their $50 all network pass a better deal. To join For Bondage is $15 by itself. Which isn’t a bad price. I think if you’re into weird and fetish content you would probably download all 63 scenes.
Crowd Bondage is very reminiscent of Kink’s Public Disgrace. They take a woman, tie her up and a group of men and even women take turns having sex with her while a group stands around and watches. Some of these are outdoors. Public Disgrace is one of my favorite sites so I do like this site too. I don’t think this site is as big on the disgrace part as Public Disgrace is. It’s a good site overall, but it is a small site too with only 25 scenes.
Badtime Stories reminds me of if you took the dark Joker from Batman and turned him loose to shoot porn. It’s common for the participants to have on face paint, costumes, strange haircuts and hair colors. There is fisting, there are scenes with the woman in a pillory with a gag in her mouth. Some of this could be disturbing to viewers. One scene has a metal clip clipped to the woman’s bottom lip, a chain goes from it to her clitoris. So, if she lifts her head it stretches her clitoris. It looks like stuff you would see in the movie Saw.
The smallest site on this network, Special Feet Force, might be the best. This also makes me think of the dark Joker from Batman. There are women tied up, tickled until they pee on themselves, sometimes still in their clothes but what makes this one different is there’s almost always a third person. The scenes start out with the “torturer” and the “victim”. The third person is supposed to be like a brainwashed sex slave. The mistress or dominatrix commands the sex slave what to do to the tied up victim. It can be licking her dirty feet. It can be having sex with her while she’s tied up. They’re onto something with this small mini-network and this site probably shows it best. It only has 8 scenes as of right now.
I’m trying to cover the main mini-networks Porn Doe has created. I’m mainly doing it because I felt like the $50 all-network pass was a pretty good deal. I think the best way to look at it is if you like two of the mini-networks, those would cost $15 each and a mini-network like this For Bondage one could be the one to push you towards getting the all-network pass. I personally liked three of the mini-networks, Mamacitaz, Amateur Euro and VIP Sex Vault, joining each of those separately would cost $45. Which makes this For Bondage only $5. I also believe more people would like the Lets Doe It mini-network than I did. It has a few other mini-networks with it too including a transsexual one, Doe Girls which reminds me kind of Wow Girls and Hot Babes Plus. It almost feels like they’re justified in charging $50 for all these mini-networks.
Here on For Bondage they show they are willing to push the limits. They are tying models up to old medieval devices with what looks like 200-300 pound strength chains, turning the crank which pulls the model’s arms or legs. I said this several times while watching scenes, “This is some crazy shit.” I felt like Lawrence Fishburne. The “acting” in the scenes is very good. For Bondage has subtitles as well even though I’m not for sure they’re that good at translating.
For Bondage has scenes you would want to check out if you joined the all-network pass just because I don’t think anyone is doing this type of porn. Even their Crowd Bondage site which is a direct ripoff of Kink’s Public Disgrace really is better than a lot of the Public Disgrace scenes. It’s a good thing in porn when the viewer is most upset that you’re not updating. I haven’t said that in a long time but when someone complains there’s not enough content it’s because they like the content and want to see more of it.
The video quality is the same as their other sites and mini-networks. No 4K but they do have 1080p and 720p plus mobile versions. They have the 100 download limit PER network so that doesn’t carry over. A month of the all-network pass gives you around 1,000 downloads total. Fun mini-network all-around that just needs to get back into producing new updates or combine it with one of the other mini-networks.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large site that focuses on mainly young female models and something of a theme with “school” with schoolgirl outfits being common.
- The scene count has to be looked at from different angles. There are interview videos mixed in that are from the New Sensations DVDs. The count is 403 with no set update schedule but was updated 3 times this past month (February 2022).
- High quality video downloads and photosets.
- Models are all attractive and pros. The theme of young is captured well.
- Very fast download speeds (90% of max)
- The site looks good and works well. I’m not for sure that’s the best pro a site can have (see bottom line)
Cons:
- I knew the male talent would eventually wear on me and sure enough, it happened. I will have to explain that in the bottom line.
- This site is a good example of how you get into my skepticism. There are interview videos, posted as updates, from their DVDs which is a way to advertise their VOD site. See the bottom line.
Bottom Line:
This site is not bad, but it has made me reconsider my New Sensations network review score. This site’s only real connections to school are the outfits. Most of the scenes are in a house and on a couch or bed. There’s very little effort to make this a school fetish or anything more than a young female fetish site. You can’t really go wrong with that. It has been working for 70 years. I was expecting a little more story and playfulness from the models. Even silly acting. There could be some scenes that have that. I’m not going to watch all of them to verify it. I can see that most of these scenes are common porn. Guy with a young, cute or pretty female. In my early days of reviewing, I once said, a site is only as good as its models look. I still think that’s true. They do good on that part. The outfits look good. It just starts falling into the feeling of I’ve seen this before. I don’t know how much age plays into that being a problem.
When one of my biggest pros and compliments is the site looks good and works well, that’s probably not a good thing. I shouldn’t even be noticing those things. It’s like the gold-plated strip club. People said the strippers weren’t that good but where else could you sit at a gold table and watch women strip? I think you would eventually get over the gold table part. I mentioned bringing my skepticism. That’s not something I like to do. I do have a long history with this network. What I see is a site that has the right idea and the right setup. That is an old feeling I had years ago on New Sensations. I’m not going to call it bait and switch. They’re not doing anything terrible or in bad practice. They’re doing what they know works. This site shows it more than the others. I hadn’t seen this site before this membership. The oldest scene was posted in 2012. I believe my last membership here was 2010. As impressed with some of the movie previews, as I am, I open those to find out it’s an interview. That gives me flashbacks to renting porn DVDs with a beautiful model on the cover. You would get to the end of the DVD and the model on the cover wasn’t in any scenes. The interviews have some “value” but where’s there’s value there’s taking away from. You can see how cute and nice some of these models are. Others are just saying they are only in it for the sex and money.
The site is big enough, it probably should be bigger, considering it has been around nearly 10 years. The updates are not even close to following a schedule. In February 2022, there were 3 new scenes. In January 2022, there was 1. Before January 2022, there are months with 0 updates. If they can keep up 2-4 scenes per month that’s acceptable. It has around 405 scenes counting interviews. I used “around” mainly because the last oldest scenes are really the two newest scenes. I don’t know how that happens. They do offer 4K on the newer videos. The pictures are a highlight. It’s just because they know to include 15-20 of the model by herself before switching to screencaps. You can download those in a zip.
The male talent gets too much camera time. If it was a site about the couple being sexy. I could understand it. It’s a site about Fresh Outta High School. The use of the male is questionable to begin with. This was the problem I had with New Sensations in the past. I don’t remember which old Porn User said it, “We’re not paying to see Igor talk or look at him”. That’s the feeling. If you have to include a man in a schoolgirl site, keep him out of view as much as possible. This is probably the toughest con. They’re made me wonder how good their DVDs are. Good for their marketing team but it’s based on a lot of these scenes on the site are filler scenes on DVDs. Every porn DVD ever released had filler scenes. That’s what you’re getting on this site. You’re going to have to join their VOD site and pay $6-$20 to buy or rent one DVD. That’s how you enter my skepticism. You’ve showed me you are making higher grade porn and the price shows it. You can get this whole network for $10-$20. I got it for $10 back around the holidays. I can see that you can’t even buy one of their VOD DVDs for $20. It has 4-6 scenes on it.
It could be better overall, and I think for someone newer to porn it’s a good value. There are plenty of pretty models on this site and you get the network access included. The problem is going to be, I may not be back for another 12 years. I think an 80 is fair. It has everything it needs (quality, pretty models). Nothing extra, no bells and whistles. It will get you by. The best way to wrap this up is these are the same type scenes you would see on Videobox. I’m not going to drop the network’s score. I know that other people haven’t been a member of New Sensations going on 15 years. I used to join this network 2-3 times a year.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
*I am re-reviewing sites I have scored 100, in the past, to see if those perfect scores still hold true*
- Even if not a 100, FTV has been a consistent top or near top scoring site for me for 16 years now.
- The video download quality and photo download quality is some of the best you will see.
- The models, while by definition, first timers, are mostly amateur though a few established porn stars have appeared on FTV.
- Similar to Zishy on this one, I generally love the clothing choices the models wear for their videos and pictures.
- Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
- Navigation and tags are great once you understand them
- Usually can also join FTV Milfs with a promo when signing up.
Cons:
- The punishment of having a site over 20 years. The older photo sets and videos need remastering and some have been remastered.
- I’ll prepare for the boos on this one, I haven’t ever liked the girl/girl scenes or boy/girl scenes on FTV. Keep it solo!
Bottom Line:
FTV is one of the few sites that I truly believe can score 100 and not hear complaints about the 100. It was one of the first solo American-based sites to enter the online porn world. The models have never been complained about by anyone. These models are usually amateur and they dress or are dressed in a way that normal, young women dress. That means you get a lot of teasing, especially in the pictures. With the addition of FTV Milfs and the ability to sign-up for both, you really could just join the two FTV sites and never pay attention to any other porn site. Or at least I could.
The choice of clothing seems like an ironic pro for porn but there’s one key word to describe the clothing, feminine. I’ve never shied away from my deep interest in women that are strong on the femininity. The FTV ladies do femininity better than any site I know of and they do so without being glam.
The videos on FTV show you a whole other side too. I once said the FTV setup of pictures and videos, is art-like. The videos retain the femininity of the photos but the ladies are more often naked and often being very kinky in the videos. You will see toy appearances from the FTV Toy, a large dildo that all the ladies used to try. That toy was more popular than any male pornstar.
There is the part that’s easy to forget about. The public nudity and flashing. The newer scenes still have some public nudity and flashing but it’s not near as noticeable as some of the older content, which is understandable. Our society has become more prudent and it’s now considered a terrible thing for a young lady to flash her boobs or even masturbate in public.
The navigation on FTV is one of my favorite parts but have known quite a few people who didn’t like it. You go through pages of models. You can filter them down to ages to hair color, however you want. You have to remember there are models from over 20 years. It’s a huge list. That’s why the tags are helpful. The tags will lead you to “most” of what you’re looking for. I say “most” because some of the newer scenes don’t seem to have as much care put into if the tags are all there.
One of the longtime cons for fans was the splitting of videos. When I scored FTV a 100, I listed the splitting of videos as not bothering me any longer and it still doesn’t. I guess I have watched the videos enough times that I realized the splitting is often for effect. I know when we hear of porn scenes being split, we think about a scene showing a woman getting into her masturbation, then the video stopping and leaving us to wait on our computer to download part 2 but that’s not how the FTV scenes are split. The masturbation part will be a full scene before cutting. After the cut, it may be the woman masturbating again but the type of toy, her outfit, the setting, will be different. I just don’t see it being a negative in the same vein as cutting scenes halfway through.
The list of pros is far more important to me. You will have a difficult time finding a site with this many attractive and maybe more importantly, kinky models. FTV shows the true strength of solo porn. The model is on her own. I will even mention Danielle (Blonde curly hair), one of the hottest models anyone has ever seen on a pornsite. But, even after trying multiple takes and even bringing her back to the site, she just struggled with giving a performance that matched her incredible looks. There are other models that might not jump out at you with their looks but then put on a near-perfect masturbation show and you see the similarity between real-life and porn. It’s not always just about looks. It may be about something different for every person that watches the scenes. And that is FTV’s strength. The scenes are authentic and even in the most kinky ones, it’s attractive and not just in a lustful way.
At least for me, I have found I look at the models differently when I see them on FTV. You see the real person not an actress. That is the selling point. These models whether a 10 or a 6, are going to either win fans over with their performance or fail no matter how hot they are.
I am going to score it similar to how I have in the past. A 96 and the 4 points deduction is for the lesser amount of public nudity and teasing.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It’s that time of the year to review FTV. A site I first reviewed in 2007.
- I try to make these reviews a little different from my previous one of the same site. I don’t know if the high production values makes members think this is not an amateur site, but it is with a few exceptions.
- A steady update schedule of 4-5 updates per month. I believe they snuck some remasters in there too as bonus updates.
- I’ve been a member on this site for so long I think I have my own tag, that’s how well their tags work once you figure them out.
- I really don’t need to talk about the quality of the photographs or videos, do I? I will in the bottom line.
- It’s a strange pro but important one. The site does what it says it’s going to do. You get what you paid for.
- Being my 500th review it’s going to contradict this one, I would just be happy with a membership to this site and no others.
Cons:
- It looks like to me they’ve decided to lay off using the public nudity tag even on the scenes that show public nudity in the preview picture. I’m sure there’s a reason behind it but I relied heavily on that tag.
- Those split videos are now one of my favorite parts but other people will see them as cons.
Bottom Line:
This is review #500. If you had told me in 2007 that I would be writing my 500th review in 2021 and it would be of FTV Girls, I would have said, “What took me so long and FTV is still around?” As much as I talked about the 3 straight years of Zishy membership, it’s not quite as impressive or concerning as my 8 straight years of at least 9 months (per year) of FTV memberships. I first reviewed FTV in 2007, my first year on PU and the first year of PU.
I have explained this in previous reviews of FTV and will again. It’s something I see as a negative for some. The videos being in parts. It took me about 10 years to figure out the point of it. It is to make it where you can download only the parts you want. Because FTV does touch on different fetishes, there are some parts of the “full” video, some people don’t want or in my case, I sometimes only want the exhibitionism part of the video. Considering the FTV new scenes are in 4K, I believe it’s even more of a positive. One of the newer scenes is a total of 23GB for the video parts. I would not be happy about downloading 23GB to watch 6 minutes of exhibitionism at the first of the video. Even if I downloaded the 1080p, it would be around 10GB total and I wouldn’t be happy about storing a 10GB file or waiting on it to download just to watch 6 minutes of it. I figured this out when I couldn’t come up with a negative reason for FTV splitting the videos. Some sites (I won’t name them), split videos up so they can release one today, the other tomorrow, to make it look like they’re updating more and to boost their video count. FTV doesn’t do that. They release all the parts at the same time. It’s a feature built for improving the member’s experience with their content. Maybe I can see why it wouldn’t hurt to have a full scene download option but can tell you, I wouldn’t be using it.
I’m surprised they aren’t using their public nudity tag as much. You can look at the preview right now and see that at least half of the last 30 updates show public nudity but none of those have the public nudity tag. If that keeps bringing in more public nudity then I won’t mind or complain at all.
The models are the most important part to FTV. So many people do not realize this is an amateur site. I know there are a few exceptions but as an example, of the last 30 new models, 29 were shooting their 1st ever porn scene. I’ve said it before, every porn star started somewhere. It’s not FTV’s fault if the model goes on to film 468 gangbang scenes and that’s a major selling point of FTV for me. You get to see these models that you may never see again or that you may see fighting 16 dicks in a gangbang. I don’t believe a lot of these models go on to careers in porn. I see them more as curious, playful, often silly and flirty young women who just want to make some money and do something they may not ever get the chance to do again.
The quality is exactly what I expect from FTV. The newer videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p and one smaller one. Since I only download the parts of the video I want, I do download the 1080p. I usually only download 720p on other sites. The older scenes do have a drop off in resolution but outside of their earliest years, FTV has almost always had very high quality. Their pictures can be downloaded and the high resolution zip files are 5200 long end. One of my biggest compliments for FTV is the colors in their photos and videos. Their pictures and videos are life-look looking, natural lighting, instead of the lighting we see a lot of studios use that make the models look like they’re glowing in the dark.
Something has been fixed that I felt was a bigger con than the split videos. The filenaming system has been updated. For years, maybe even a decade, the scenes were all numbered 01, 02, 03 and so on. Which meant you had a bunch of 01 scenes like this 01, 01 (1), 01 (2) and no way to know who was in the video without opening it. Here is a filename of a video I just downloaded earlier “sinclair-(scene number) - 01”. That’s a major deal if you’re an organizational weirdo like me. I even looked back and downloaded a few old scenes, all scenes have the new filenaming system. That’s how you make a 99 site a 100. The site has proven time and time again to be the site I return to and my bank statement would tell you the same thing. I can’t think of anything I would change on FTV. Some of the models this year are easily in the top 10 FTV models of all-time and they were 1st timers. It’s the best site in porn, for my tastes and after 500 reviews, I have no reason to believe there’s one I’ve missed. They also use CCBill as their billing processor, not that I cancel it very often. I usually try to join it 3 months at a time, then take a month off, then back to a 3 month, month off, and back to a 3 month. If all other porn sites were free, I would still pay for FTV Girls.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- If I reviewed it based just on subjectivity, the score would be a 100.
- Going on 5 years of having a membership here at least 9 out of 12 months of each year.
- One of the simplest sites to use despite being a very large site.
- Solo, public nudity, public flashing, exhibitionism, extreme insertions, and many of the models are being recorded for the 1st time.
- Technical aspects of the site and content are close to the top of the industry.
- Update rate has increased though not entirely set in stone, pretty common to get a new update every 4-5 days instead of once per week and went through a few months of a new update every 3 days.
- Photo sets are some of the best in the industry.
- Highest video download options are 4K with 12000 bitrate.
- Probably the prettiest amateur models you'll find on any site.
- Downloads are fast (85% of max speed)
- Tag system is one of the best I've used.
- Sorting features for finding models is also useful (all will be explained in BL)
Cons:
- The 1 point I took off is because I know so many are against the split videos. I've been a member on it for so long that I've picked up on why the videos are split and now prefer it.
- Filenames are still 01, 02, 03. I just make a folder for each model and download them to that but if a model has more than one scene it's still possible to get them mixed up.
Bottom Line:
I had told several members that I thought FTV was going to get my first and only 100 rating but I took 1 objective point off for the split videos. I used to take 10 off for it.
I'll talk about that first. The scenes are split to change locations, to change outfits, to change whatever action the model is doing. For me, a lover of exhibitionism, there are models on here that I'm really not that interested in except for their exhibitionism parts. I'll call that the fetish is greater than the model rule. On those, being able to just download one 5-10 minute exhibitionism clip of the model is a lot better than downloading a 60 minute video that I'll only watch the first 5-10 minutes of.
I'm sure there are people that like the masturbation better and fast-forward the exhibitionism, they can just download the masturbation parts and don't have to download the full video.
I think that split video format reminds us too much of the old days when you would be watching a porn scene only to realize you hadn't downloaded the 2nd part and the 1st part stopped mid-sex. That's not what FTV is doing with the split scenes.
The tagging system is one of my favorite parts of FTV. Each scene has a row of icons on it. These icons tell you what happens in the scene, "1st time on camera", "public nudity" and it's the easiest to use tagging system. See above, I like the exhibitionism, I can find those scenes with one click.
You then have the models. FTV Girls is close to 1,500 models and to me they're all attractive, maybe not all are my types but all are attractive. You will see some pros and most of those filmed for FTV before they were pros, not all. I always thought one of the best examples was Eva Angelina who was very early in her porn career and while she isn't shy on FTV she's nothing like she became in hardcore porn.
There are many models on here that you'll wish had more content on other sites too. It's one of the few sites that makes you think, "How could she stop at these 4 photo sets and 100 minutes of video?"
The exhibitionism, while maybe toned down a little, is still very much a part of the site and the 18-19 years of archives. They have changed their public nudity tag to say, "Risky flashing and getting naked in public places". Which means even the scenes not tagged that way still often have some light flashing. That's the big selling point for me. I would join just for those parts.
When you search the potentially overwhelming model list you can filter by date of release, alphabetical, age, height and bra size. You, of course, can use the tags too. It's one of the most complete and easy to use (once you get the hang of it) navigation systems I've used.
The technical quality continues their excellence. The newer photo sets have a 5000 long end option that you can download. You can also download a smaller resolution as well. The current videos have 480p, 1080p and 4K with above average bitrates to match the resolutions. Even the 480p has a 3000+ bitrate.
They have something I think a lot of sites should add and that's a sneak peek section to show you the next couple of updates so you know what's coming up. It also shows the more frequent update schedule I mentioned earlier. They had a new set on 3/17/20, have another coming on 3/21/20 and another on 3/27/20. They're upped their game there. I was happy with one per week.
These updates are worth mentioning as well as they're not one video and one photo set. These updates come with 250-500 photos (spread across 4-5 sets/different outfits and locations) and 70-100 minutes of video. They could, if they wanted, release one photo set a day and one section of the video and I would guess say they have an update everyday.
They have a bonus section that has several hundred outtakes, public flashing, models masturbating in the car on the ride to the setting for the shoot and these are all FTV models so you can get some extra content of your favorite models. Some are photos, some are 3-5 minute videos and it's worth looking into these since I've found some very good videos that I don't know why they're not mixed in with the regular shoot.
The total amount of content is nearing 10,000 photo sets/videos and here's a few breakdowns by tags:
Nearly 1,000 of the models have some content listed as Public Nudity.
Nearly 900 of the models are listed as 1st time filmed.
Those two alone are enough for me to stick around as long as I have. The photo sets, besides the technical numbers, feature the models in normal, everyday clothes, especially if you've ever been to the west coast of the United States. When I started getting bored with glam models, I started joining FTV more (around 2013) and to me the models are very natural looking and acting for American models. There's also some ethnic diversity. I keep trying to find something to complain about but it's not working. I personally think it's the best all-around porn site on the internet.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large site that has returned more to its amateur roots.
- In my opinion, the best site for those who like public flashing, touching, as these once favorites have now returned in nearly every new update.
- Models are starting to become more varied in appearance. There's been several busty-type models added recently (Darcie is a favorite). Also seeing more dark haired models, there was a time when it seemed like 90% of new models on here were blonde.
- Video and photo quality are both excellent, zips for downloading photo sets.
- Lots of sporty girls, flexible, working out, dancing.
- Site navigation has improved greatly.
Cons:
- The days of the more extreme FTV seem to be over. You rarely see the giant dildos or the FTV Toy, but it's not a con for me, could be for others.
- Webmaster or whoever programs the site goes a little overboard with the use of tags, really, it's not public nudity just because the model gets nude in a private backyard in Arizona.
- And the big one, the videos are still split into parts. I don't know how many times I've reviewed FTV or commented about it, but despite all the reasoning I've heard, "The different clips show the progression of the scene" was one, and another was, "Some people don't like masturbation, others don't like teasing, the clips allow users to pick just the ones they like". So does the fast-forward and rewind button.
Bottom Line:
FTV has always been an up and down site for me. Many times as a member, the up and down status happened from day to day. I admit, one of my favorite niches in porn is public nudity/flashing and even better if the model slips a little masturbation in too.
I like the combination of danger/excitement/arousal you see from the models in the public nudity scenes. And one really big plus for FTV is the models, at least to me, are becoming more and more amateur. I'm sure it's no different than it used to be where someone like Eva Angelina appeared here early in her career then went on to be one of the most prolific porn actresses of all-time.
FTV to me is the best public nudity site available that is still updating. So if public, exhibitionism is your thing, you should try it out just for those scenes.
The site's navigation has improved thanks to a new design in the member's area. New might not be the right word, but it was new to me when I joined 3 months ago. I had been away from this site since roughly 2010. It could still be improved by better tagging. All scenes now have tags across the top of their description. These are nicely done bold and bright tags that make it easy to see if a scene has something in it you might like. Some examples:
Nu! = Public Nudity, O = Real Orgasm, Ex = Extreme Scene and so on. These are very useful except for one thing. Since adding this tagging system they've went back and tagged every scene on their entire site. I will give them credit for not just throwing every tag possible on every scene, but there's the occasional misused tag that can be frustrating.
The frustration is made worse by the videos being cut into parts. Instead of just downloading one big file then scanning through it for the part you're most interested in, you have to download 4-10 parts then open each one and look for the part you're interested in.
If that's not enough frustration, the videos here are such high quality that it makes you wonder if they realize stopping to load another video is breaking up the continuity of the scenes? An example: Cayton Cayley (Candice) has a scene where she's flashing in a car repair garage. There's men all around and she's getting more aroused by each one that look at her. Then ... the video stops. Load the next one, watch the FTV logo for 2-5 seconds, video starts and she's walking to a room in the back where men are going to watch her masturbate. That's not only senseless, but it's illogical. One of the few believable things I've heard behind the reasoning of breaking the scene up is "Videos are shot in different locations". While I'm sure video editing software could piece those together still, I can at least see how one moment the model is nude in public, the next she's in a bed getting ready to masturbate, could also make the videos less natural-feeling, but the one I used above was in the same building. As are many others.
My guess is it will never change. It's been this way for over 10 years. Outside of that fairly big problem, the site delivers. The change from some extreme scenes to hardly no extreme scenes didn't bother me.
The size of the site can be overwhelming. I don't have near as much time to view/download porn as I used to so I've ended up staying at FTV for 3 straight months trying to rebuild my collection of their content. Updates are once a week and include videos and photos of one model. It's also still a great site for collectors since a lot of well-known porn stars including hardcore, extreme ones, were here on FTV early in their careers, showing some innocence and playfulness, you don't see from them in their newer work.
The interviews are often funny and show the model's personality away from being a model. I would even wonder how many models have helped/hurt themselves with these interviews?
I know there's been reviews and comments about the download speed being poor, but I haven't experienced any problems over the 3 months. My download speed on here is roughly 90% or higher of what it should be. Just tested it again before writing this review.
Overall, this is how I see this site: There's high-quality photos and videos. Decent download options on the videos and zips for the photos. The improved navigation (since 2010) makes the site much easier to use. Even the types of models have improved over the last year or so (subjective). But there's always that one but revolving around the split videos. I can say I took off 6-8 points for the split videos. It creates too much of a frustration situation. I can either download the clips I know I'll like and skip the others, which will make me wonder what I missed or I can just download them all, which is what I end up doing.
Even with the frustration, it's the best at public nudity and at finding very attractive amateur models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A long-running site that is a good place to start as a porn collector.
- 1920x1080 on the videos over the last 3 years
- Pictures come zipped
- Weekly update could be considered a con
- They do continuously get amateur models in their first or at least close to their first shoots
- Good download speeds, around 90% of my max download speed.
Cons:
- My biggest gripe is with the pictures. I never understood the purpose of having a "superpic" section where the webmaster decides to put 3000 high end and 4000 high end zips for his favorite sets. These are not that often and the vast majority of sets are only 1600 high end.
- Has been in a slow decline, could be because I've joined it once or twice a year, will further in BL.
- That one weekly update just isn't enough and will further this as well.
- No real reason to complain about it since they do separate the videos into parts based on the action, but it's becoming a con to me not to be able to download full scenes.
Bottom Line:
FTV has had its really strong years. If you've never joined the site would score higher than I'm scoring it, but I just can't give it a higher score based on my most recent join.
I'll start by saying I had everything I wanted from the site up until March 2011's updates. I have always liked their style of photography and most of the videos as well and have kept those on an external. I probably wouldn't have rejoined if not for a promo that dropped the price nearly in half. Even then, as a returning member, I'm not for sure I feel like I got my money's worth. For this whole membership, I downloaded and will keep:
14 models, videos and pictures.
I'm sure the everyone has different tastes rule applies here, but only 14 models appealing to me out of 70-75 since my last membership just isn't good, at least not for me. In comparison, I have over 200 FTV models, so you can see how it has declined for me. I would normally find 30-40 per year I liked, this time it was 14 in 20 months.
It's possible it could be more than just the model's not appealing to me. The scenes, similar to how they have always been, have several videos for each model being more playful and acting silly than being nude. Maybe I'm just getting older and find those more irritating than cute? So you can decide on that one. If you like that style of porn you can disregard my negativity towards it.
The picture size is a no longer an excuse situation. Saying we're going to post 3000 or 4000 high end resolution photos on our (FTV) favorite sets and make the other 90% or higher only 1600 high end is unacceptable to me. You're catering to members not your own taste or maybe I'm wrong on that.
What this equals for me is a site that isn't appealing to me with as many models. Then you just get one update per week with a 1/5 chance I'm going to even like that model, only 4 updates per month, so my 1/5 chance isn't looking so good. A premium price if you join it without a promo, only to find out you only get the highest resolution photos for the sets they pick to do those high resolution ones on. Videos broken up into parts and the scroll like mad navigation, all of which are minor problems by themselves, but when added together make for a big problem. Something has to give. Either the price goes down or more updates or added or you give full scene downloads or you give 3000x4000 resolution pictures on all sets. Or be daring, give them all for the premium price and I won't bitch about the price.
Having said all this, I won't throw FTV completely under the bus, so to speak. They have their strengths. You will see pornstars you know of, but most of their sets were shot early in the model's career. You do get to see a different side of the models than on nearly all other sites. And when they do it, you get some of the best exhibitionism content available. If you've never joined it, I would give it one of my highest recommendations for a first time membership. You also will see some models you've never seen before and probably won't see them ever again. The video quality is as crystal clear in 1920x1080 as any 1080p porn videos I've seen. I think that just hurts the lower resolution photos since it's obvious they have the ability to shoot extremely high quality video. And the superpics section ends up becoming more of a poke from them to say, "we could be giving you these resolution photos on every set". May not be their intentions, but it sure seems that way.
I also don't care for the girl/girl content which has become more common. This just goes into a whole feeling of, there are lesbian sex sites out there that do it better. I didn't list this in cons though since it's no worse than having a pretty girl do cartwheels for 5 minutes. I do get the feeling and have had the feeling before that as a member, you're going to get content based on what the webmaster likes or has fetishes for and still feel that way. I would like to see more variation in the models too. There has never been a maximum age limit on the models and they used to shoot more mid to late 20s models. It now seems like a purely teen site in the newer updates.
As I'm leading to recommending it, there has to be some stipulations added here. If you've never been a member or have only been a member once or twice, it's still a definite join and recommendation. If you're like me and have the majority of the archive and are only missing the last year or so, look at the previews and decide if enough of the models would appeal to you. I should have, but I was shocked to find a promo through, I think Twistys, that I just jumped on the deal before checking out the newer updates. I'm running out of room, but will add a comment about what seems to be a slightly different version of their site, not for sure if it's a mobile version or if it's a new format since the promo I used sent me to it instead of the regular site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Long overdue re-review of one of the internet's best known porn sites. Originally rated a 91.
- The newest videos are 1440x1080 with hefty 8000 bitrates, also available in a much smaller 352x240 resolution and a middle ground 720x480 resolution version.
- Pictures have been upgraded to 1600 long end, older pictures range from 1052 to 1280 long end. All are downloadable in zips.
- Site runs very fast for me. I consistently get 20% higher speed on downloads than my average download speed.
- As much exclusive content as just about any site I can name off the top of my head.
- Sets are usually more fun than other sites, a little more daring with some public sets, lots of pre-masturbation flashing as well.
- One of the first sites to have a lot of "squirting" content.
- One of the best sites for finding older content of current hardcore stars. Eva Angelina, Sativa Rose, Jenaveve Jolie, Amy Reid to name a select few have some early career solo sets here.
Cons:
- Videos are still split into parts with no full scene download option. I'm not really for sure what the reasoning is behind this practice, but it gets them a few points reduction.
- This is a personal preference one. I know a lot of members wanted newer, fresher models near the amateur level and they have delivered that. That's not something I like though. I prefer the glammed up models.
- Some of the content can become tedious. Like watching a model trying to flash her boobs for 4 minutes. Some of the older sets feature some of porn's wilder girls who just do it.
- A small con to end the cons, I would like to see more pictures from the sets.
Bottom Line:
I seem to be in a porn lull right now. I decided to try FTV out again after nearly 2 years away from it.
The first thing that I'm going to talk about is that the older content is better than the newer content. I think that was because of the models. Eva Angelina's sets here are some of her best on the internet. Also, I stand by my previous statement that the first set with Amy Reid is Amy's best set of her career.
Of the models that have been added since I was last a member (December 2007), I downloaded and plan to keep the content of 12 of them. They update roughly 4 times a month, so at best, I downloaded and will keep 12 out of 90 models. Even at that, most of the 12 are known porn stars.
Most of the other models are girls that look like girls I went to school with or could be the pizza delivery girl. That's great for some members, but I'm not really into the amateur, girl next door look. Though I do really like Tessa, one of the newer models, who I don't think is a porn star.
One really good part for me is that I lost my FTV files from 2007 when one of my hard drives fried. I was able to go back and get those really great pre-2008 sets.
Overall, the site is still one of the best overall sites. It just isn't that great for me. I kind of feel like I just re-joined to get the content I already had.
If it was my first time joining it, I would probably score it in the low 90s.
The split video parts are annoying. It definitely isn't because of size restrictions or concerns. The parts are rarely over 8 minutes each. This is compounded by having a splash screen on nearly all videos. So even if you line the parts up in a media player, there is still the hesitation between loading the parts plus a 2 second splash screen.
I tried joining the files into one big file, but there is still a splash screen every 8 minutes. I could edit the video and cut the splash screen out, but that's more work than I should have to do for a premium site.
The complaint with wanting more pictures should be taken as a compliment. I've always liked their photo sets especially the more public ones and would like to see 250-300 photos from each set.
You really can't knock the site on technical quality. The 1440x1080 videos are very crisp. I do wish more sites would optimize the bitrates to fit the resolution size. I would imagine a 1440x1080 video could run smoothly with a 4000-5000 bitrate, but that's nitpicking.
Most of the interviews are fun enough. It goes back to the model in each one. Eva Angelina is very funny in hers.
The site could easily score 95+ with a few changes. It's hard to say a site has a potential when it has been around as long as FTV has, but it is the best word I can think of in this situation. For those into newer, more unknown models check it out. Some of these newer models they have are really cute and come across as very genuine. Still recommended, especially for those who have never joined it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots and lots of beautiful women
- Seeing all kinds of major stars who you know from hardcore movies in softcore, some before they were famous
- FTV toy scenes are almost as good as hardcore
- Very good quality picture sets and high quality video
- Seeing the girls' personalities since most have at least one clip that is talking/interviewing
Cons:
- You won't see many models who have a lot of curves on here...very slim women
- The pro of interviewing can become a con after seeing every girl answer the same way for the most part, "I love sex all the time, anywhere"
- Site can become very repetitive
- Nothing close to hardcore and even g/g scenes are few and far between
- Some of the girls are very shy and leave you teased more than pleased
Bottom Line:
I come back to FTV about once every 6 months, this is the 4th or 5th time I've been a member. FTV was one of the first sites I bought a membership to.
The first few times you see a model use the FTV toy, you will really be excited and impressed, but then it gets repetitive as well. If the girls don't want to try other girls, maybe at least, get two in the same room masturbating at the same time. There really are a lot of major stars on here, that are mostly going by different names than you know them. Some may even slip by without you even realizing who they are.
These points are hard to decide if they are bad things or good things. There are other girls on here who you have never seen before and considering that they look to by shy after watching their videos, you start to think you won't ever see them again on video. One part that is good is that the videos and masturbation is very real. Most of the girls become soaked right there for you to see. Maybe a standout video for me is Amy Ried, who is now into hardcore, in her FTV video she gets about as wet as I have seen a woman get in a solo video, and you actually tell she is geniunely embarrassed by it. Eva Angelina is also here (no glasses sorry fellas), Sativa Rose, Jenevieve Jolie, Shy Love but those right there are going to be by far the curviest and are in the minority. I would still recommend it, I keep going back, so something must be there.
Follow-Up:
Recent HD videos have boosted my original score by 4 points. Incredible quality!
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
– Give me FTV Girls and FTV Milfs and I'm all but set on my porn needs.
– Updating 4 times a month.
– Video and picture quality is as good as you will get.
– Download picture zips and videos. Unlimited as far as I know.
– Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
– The best collection of amateur Milfs.
– Still the best navigation, too.
Cons:
– The infamous nitpick con of porn needs to establish an age range with Milfs and Matures. I'm really not complaining. Just needed a con.
Bottom Line:
The last few years of my porn collecting has seen me turn to mostly amateur models. I'm confident in saying no fully nude porn site gets better amateur models than FTV Girls and FTV Milfs.
FTV Milfs runs into the debate over the use of the Milf word, while it's true, an 18 year old model could be a Milf, by definition. The word in porn does generally signify an age range or if not a range, let's say “over 25”. I've said many times, my favorite porn models are 25-35. That was a big deal back when I said that, I joined and collected a lot of sites with teen models. That was because teens were the big focus in European porn. Things have changed now and my preferred model, body type, seems to be replacing the popularity of teen models.
FTV Milfs covers that range well, but their FTV Girls does too. I join both at the same time.
There are good reasons: Nearly all the content is solo. I like seeing the models wearing their normal clothes, being ready in said clothes and seeing how comfortable they look. There doesn't seem to be any pressure on them to do anything they're not comfortable doing and because of that, they do nearly everything imaginable to themselves. Somewhere, a male pornstar, or just a random male, is saying he can do more for the model than she can and there's me, shaking my head.
I'm even thinking women feel flattered to be on this site. Something special happens when an amateur model’s perception starts out on a positive note instead of feeling like she's just another number on the casting couch. You can see it in the content.
The only downside FTV Milfs has is it's not been around as long as FTV Girls. The site is still big. There are over 400 models and there is a great blend of body types, boob size, race and most look like women you catch yourself taking a second or third look at while shopping for produce.
Speaking of produce, nothing is off limits, bananas acting like dildos and my favorite niche of public nudity, it's all covered on FTV Milfs.
The navigation on the FTV sites continues to make me wonder why others haven't copied it. There is an off chance my years of membership makes it easier to use, but their tags are as good as I have used. I think I even admitted, at one time, I didn't notice the tags and/or just thought those were there for looks. I can't give a number on how accurate the tags are but each time I've clicked one, I've found exactly what the tag said I would find.
The picture sets are some of my favorites. I have regularly admitted I have clothing fetishes and still do. I'm starting to think I'm not going to grow out of those. I would call the pictures warm and natural. The models are also one of the bigger collections of natural Milfs. I haven't noticed a lot of tattoos or implants. Of course, tattoos don't bother me. The models look real. Years ago, I considered the FTV Girls site to be glam, but not anymore and FTV Milfs isn't necessarily glam. Some of the models do seem to feel best in pretty dresses, but it's dresses you would see women wearing at the store.
The downloads are unlimited as far as I know, but I wouldn't be close to hitting a limit. I mostly just download the new videos and picture sets. I have an entire external hard drive of FTV Girls and FTV Milfs content.
I have said this before about just a handful of sites, it feels like a premium site.
You still get 4 new updates per month and that's almost always 4 new women. I don't join enough mainstream porn sites to say all the models are amateurs but that's going to lead me to say, I believe they are. The biggest reason is a fairly simple one. The models don't act like they're just on another porn scene. I believe that could be the biggest strength of FTV Milfs. There's definitely some flattering to be one of the new four models in a month. I'm thinking back to how Playboy’s Playmates and Penthouse Pets were looked at on such an elevated level. I'm thinking these models on FTV Milfs are experiencing their chance to be like those Playmates and Pets were.
With the great navigation, fast download speeds and easy join and cancel from CCBill, there's just not much to complain about and lots to be positive about.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my favorite sites, but have lowered score a few points since my last review of it.
- Follows a similar format and style as FTV Girls.
- Nearly impossible to find a flaw with any of the technical aspects.
- Excellent tagging system that carries over from FTV Girls and works even better here with less models than FTV Girls.
- 240 models currently, the site has slowly but surely started building up a good sized archive with a new model added each week.
- One I really like, models originally starting on FTV Girls years ago are starting to show up on FTV MILFs, 5-10 years after first appearing on FTV Girls. The most recent was Trinity St. Clair.
- A potential pro or con, there's a higher percentage of hardcore male/female sets on FTV MILFs than FTV Girls.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of my max) and the site runs smooth with multiple navigation positives.
Cons:
- One that might not go over well with those used to FTV Girls, more pornstars are showing up here than FTV Girls.
- Would like more updates as there are months with 2-3 pornstars being in updates, with only 4 updates per month, it lowers the percentage of new first time models.
- No longer a con for me but I know it is for some, the videos are split into actions/parts.
Bottom Line:
The FTV sites have been in my top 5 sites for the last 5 years. FTV Girls still is and I would go as far as saying it's my #1 site after nearly 4 years of constant memberships. I still see FTV MILFs as a top site, it's just not quite as good as FTV Girls.
I'm going to be straight to the point with the newer models part. Of the last 7 models, 4 have been pornstars and I know it must be hard to find MILFs that are First Time Experiences but this slight problem also includes more hardcore scenes. Some sites can pull off the switch between solo site to hardcore but with the established FTV style, hardcore just doesn't work for me.
One of the biggest strengths of FTV MILFs are the models that are first time models but they project a confidence of an older woman who maybe has always wanted to get naked on camera. I think most men in their 30s and up have met at least one woman like this in their life. You meet her and she seems nice and you notice she likes to wear skimpy clothes. The next thing you know, she's showing you upskirts and you're having trouble keeping up with her sexual drive that you know she didn't have when she was younger.
I think the pornstars take away from that strength. I think the hardcore scenes take away from that style. Even the hardcore scenes with women that haven't been on camera before. It's like adding the guy, usually her real-life boyfriend or husband, makes it less porn.
All that explanation for removing 2 points.
Everything else is good. For example, the two newest updates are first time experiences and they're two of the better scenes on the entire site. It takes a skilled pornstar to shoot this style and make it feel like a FTV set. I use her a lot when talking about FTV MILFs, Aaliyah Love, she is very capable of being a tried and true pornstar that can make you think she's a first time on video model.
The navigation is one of the parts that keeps me around. My favorite niche in porn, these days, is exhibitionism. It doesn't have to be fully explicit. It can be teasing an upskirt and it works with these older models. Concerns about lesser exhibitionism on the FTV sites are not as high as they were a year ago. Of the last 15 updates, 14 have some level of public nudity in them and that goes even further with 19 of the last 20 updates having public nudity. Take it one step further and closer to a year, 39 of the last 40 updates have public nudity in them.
It's FTV's bread and butter or wheelhouse. They do public nudity as well as anyone.
The video quality has included 4K since January 2018 and those 4K videos have 12,000 bitrates. I don't download those but they are there for those who want them. I download the SD versions. These are 480p and they are high enough quality 480p that they're good enough for me. You also have the option of downloading 1080p if 4K is more than you want and 480p isn't enough.
My once major con of the splitting of scenes is no longer a con for me. I would even call it a pro for me. A lot of these models are best at the public nudity parts. I download the one to two clips of their public nudity but don't download the indoors masturbation videos. It's becoming a matter of efficiency for me. The quality I download also has to do with the model. If she's a model I really like, I download 1080p and usually all of her clips, not just the public nudity ones. I think that's a nice versatility to have in what you're downloading.
There are 240 models and I'll say I don't find all of them attractive. The ages vary from 24 to 54, those are more rare as you'll find the late 20s to late 30s the most common age range.
The main navigation lets you select from basics like age or breast size or alphabetical or date of release. The tagging system lets you select from Hardcore, 1st Time, Public Nudity, Fetish, Busty, Real Orgasm(s), Dildo and so on.
I do think it takes a little time to get used to the navigation as their tags don't jump out at you. They are just colored and labeled icons that you click. They all work with what looks like 100% accuracy.
Most of the scenes for the models average an hour or more of videos and 4-5 different photo sets with each photo set featuring a different outfit and location. It makes the one update per week easier to accept.
And while I complained about the hardcore scenes there are only 21 or about 10% of their scenes. Maybe that's a complaint that's really a compliment? I like their regular solo content so much that those small amount of hardcore scenes are standing out much more than they should.
As with any FTV content the photography and camerawork on videos is as good as any site on the internet, maybe In the Crack could put an argument for the best but both are nearly perfect in their filming.
I look forward to seeing this site about 5-10 years from now. Hopefully, not much has changed by then. It's still the best MILF site despite my 2 point deduction.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The older, more mature, less innocent, side of FTV.
- The site has grown quite a bit and it has weekly updates.
- Much like FTV Girls, FTV MILFs focuses on mostly solo models, lots of outdoors teasing, public flashing, extended masturbation scenes.
- The majority of these models are not models that I know of. They very much remind me of amateurs that have decided they want to have some fun.
- Everything on the site is very high quality, it first opened in 2015, so all sets have 1080p videos and the photography FTV is known for.
- For the last 3-4 years, FTV MILFs and FTV Girls have been my favorite sites.
- Extras/bonus section is one of my favorite parts. You get a little bit of everything in it and it's all FTV MILFs content. From some extra store flashing videos to models filming themselves masturbate to taking showers. It stands out to me since it is FTV content instead of some licensed content from another site.
- DL speeds are very good for me (80% and up of my max).
Cons:
- I think some might question "MILFs" but they do a good job of covering the 28-50 year old range of models, there's just not as many of the upper 40s.
- The videos are split into parts, I've gotten used to it and even might prefer it now but I know it bothers some.
- If you're into FTV for the innocence, you're not going to get much of that here.
Bottom Line:
FTV MILFs was probably my most-anticipated site. I've been joining FTV Girls since 2006 and it's one of my favorite sites but my favorite models are mid to late 20s to early to mid 40s and this site delivers maybe the best selection of mostly amateur models in that age range.
I complained for years about the split videos. The newest one has 9 parts to it but as my tastes and interests change, I've found the more narrowed down clips that focus on one or two major actions (teasing, nude in public, masturbation, extreme masturbation) has let me pick the parts I'm most interested in instead of downloading what would be a huge file. Besides having 1080p option on all videos, most of the newer content also has 4K option. That newest set has 84 minutes of video, at 1080p, that would be a large file, at 4K with 12,000 bitrate it would be massive. The split videos allow you to watch your preferred parts without having to fast forward.
To me, FTV MILFs excels because it removes the innocence of FTV Girls. A lot of these models look like regular women. You just get the feeling that when the record button is pushed, they let go of any inhibitions and nearly all give top-notch performances. You can even see an almost "joy/release" on their face when they start flashing in public.
Here's some numbers since this site is still relatively new:
- Roughly 180 models, give or take a couple.
- Each model has video that ranges from 50-90 minutes total, split into parts.
- Each model has 200-400 pictures in as many as 5 different outfits.
- Around 30 bonus scenes and/or photo sets.
The navigation of the site works as good as you'll find. There's a model list that uses icons to tell you what actions are in each set, you can filter the models by date of their scenes release, age, bra size, height. There's also a lettered search to search by the first letter of their name. There's a "girl/girl" tab, too. If you favor the scenes with public nudity, you click on the icon "Nu!" and your results will have all of the scenes with public nudity.
For me, they're getting into the area of doing everything right. At one time, I used to think they should update more but the amount of content in one scene is much more than you get in most 2-3 updates on other sites. It's possible that me opening up more to the split videos has shown me just how much time and effort is put into the scenes since say split video #5 will have the model in a completely new location with a new outfit on and she'll be doing something completely different than in split video #4.
The models ages range from 24 (one of those), 26 (one of those), 27 - 49. The MILFs category has always been one that we've joked about since an 18 year old model could be a MILF in real life. And I think anything above 50 would start going into another category.
There are some hardcore scenes on this site too. I don't really like those as well but they're not that common. And they seemed to have stopped in 2017. At least based on the HC icon search. I might be in the minority on this one but there are so many hardcore sites these days that I'm completely fine with FTV sticking to mostly solo with a few girl/girl scenes thrown in.
I ran out of room in the pros. The biller is CCBill and this might not seem like much but they've (FTV) updated their login screen. Used to, it was the box that popped up in the middle of your screen. A very annoying box that stopped you from clicking on your join email to see your username/password. You would have to submit a wrong login to get it to lower the login box. Now, it's just a blank page with username/password and it saves to your browser.
I don't know how much this shows my interest and constant enjoyment of FTV but I've had a membership to FTV Girls for nearly 5 straight years and a membership to FTV MILFs for a little over a year straight. Those one updates per week, for me, have been better than what a lot of sites release in a month. I had to reserve a separate external hard drive just for FTV content.
One thing of note, the newest update is shot in Portugal which is very different for FTV as they usually shoot on the west coast of the United States but I'm guessing it might go into some legal nonsense with the United States' fear of nudity.
If you like MILFs showing very rare levels of confidence for porn, FTV's style of shooting, public flashing, some public masturbation, anything solo, high quality pictures that are some of the best in the industry, this site is a must join for at least one month. I used to join it when I renewed my FTV Girls membership as a cross-sale, seems like it was $7 for a week and it is full access, even try it that way. It's some of the best content I've ever seen and the only thing stopping it from being higher scored is the amount of content which could be higher, if I'm nitpicking.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A fairly early version of FTV's take on the MILF genre. Content is being added by the week.
- Same FTV quality as expected. The videos all have 1080p option, picture sets top out at 4000 long end and are downloadable.
- Here's a big plus, there's some models here that are over 30, who I've never seen or heard of.
- Navigation works perfectly, it's the same as FTV's navigation on their other sites and because there's not a lot of content, it's really easy to get around to the content there is.
- Download speeds are in my excellent range. I download in my 90% of top speed range.
- Bills through CCBill
- Very good and limited tagging system, also used on FTV Girls.
- Very happy with the photo sets, most of the models have 3-4 different photo sets (different clothes/location) and in total they are 200-400 pictures of each model.
- Last pro, mainly because I think it will need to be mentioned in cons too. There's hardcore here, meaning boy/girl sets...
Cons:
- There's hardcore here. I don't consider this a con, but I've known a lot of members through the years who believe these solo-type sites shouldn't have men in them, so I thought I would mention it.
- And if you don't like FTV Girl's split video scenes, you're not going to be happy to hear that feature is on FTV MILFs too.
- A small amount of the content is from FTV Girls
Bottom Line:
I think many of us have waited patiently for the new FTV sites to be launched and this is one of them. Here's the good things:
I'm a huge FTV fan. I love the public exhibitionism, the amateur feel of the models, the way FTV sets up photography sets, the quality of the videos. I've also preferred models 25-35 for nearly my entire PU-life. So this site could be everything I've been looking for in a porn site.
The split videos are here. Yes, I've argued, debated and complained about them on FTV Girls, but their webmaster is set on them and he produces content I like so I'm adjusting. I'm still taking 5 points off for it, but if that doesn't bother you, go ahead and add 5 points to the score. Think I took 8-10 for it on my last FTV Girls review. The other "problem" is the filename system. It goes 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06 in each and every set. So, here is my fix that I've been using:
Create a folder of the model's name. In that folder make new folders for the number of sets/scenes the model has. For example, model name, set one, set two, set three, etc... Then use a download manager that allows you to save roughly 20 videos at a time and adjust the folder they are saved in to correspond with the set folder they belong in. By doing this, you offset the filename problem since there's only one 01, 02, 03, 04 in each folder.
One of the best changes the FTV sites have made in recent years is the tagging system. I personally think it's the most useful tagging system I've used. Why? Because it's very simple. The tags are:
1st - Never been in adult before.
Nu! - Public nudity
O - Real orgasms
Dil - Dildo play
Fet - Unique, fetish content
Ex - Extreme content
BB - Naturally busty girl
HC - Hardcore content, boy/girl
SpG - Sporty Girl, includes athletic content.
To top off this handy tagging system, they then list what fetishes, how far the model goes, what act of public nudity, etc...
I think every site should go to a similar tagging system.
Overall, there's a good selection/percentage of 1st time models. By my count, there's 75 models and 23 are 1st time models. There's a fairly decent mixture of body types, but there's not a lot in the way of different ethnicity. I still think finding 23 "MILFs" who have never filmed porn is an impressive number and here's the advantage. The MILFs are more confident than the teens. A lot of the 1st time teens are shy, even backwards and you can tell they have to really push/pull the models to get them to even be comfortable on camera, let alone to be confident on camera. You don't see that as much in this content. Most of the models look like/act like they want to be naked and want people looking at them.
I usually won't do this, but a model that just blew me away on FTV MILFs is Lexi. She is one of the younger models on this site at 28, but she's 5'9" 34E (natural), 26 waist, 34 hips with long, blonde hair. She's one of the few models I've ever seen that I would call stunning. And it's her 1st time on video. Maybe that's where we're at in porn these days. Used to I wanted to see a young model do her first masturbation scene or hardcore scene. Now, I kind of like the idea of the model being late 20s, who has never tried nude modeling, doing her first ever adult video. There's a believable anticipation from these older 1st time models, as if they've wanted to do it all their lives, but are just now getting around to it.
That, to me, is the strongest part of this content. There's something more genuine to it than most porn. Not to write off the teens, but I think even when they're genuine it's just to tease us old men. It makes you wonder how many of these models were told by an ex that they weren't sexual enough or weren't as sexy as the teens their exes watched in porn.
Having said that, there's still not a ton of content here ... yet. But the potential is higher than any site I've been on in a long time.
By my count, based on removing the FTV Girls content that somehow made its way onto this site, there are:
65 sets from FTV MILFs
10 sets carried over from FTV Girls (most of these are 1st time models)
Each set has 200-400 pictures and 1-2 hours of videos.
Of the 65 sets, 13 have hardcore (b/g) parts.
Model ages range from: 24-45, there's one 24, one 26, nearly all the rest are 28-45.
I've long struggled with most porn content. The model is the focus to me and I like models who can arouse with more than their natural, born-with body. Some might call it seduction. Eve Angel stayed my favorite for nearly a decade because of how she looked into the camera. Most of the models here also have that strength. Most of the teen models look at the camera like, "What are you going to do to me?" The models here look at the camera like, "You'll never believe what I'm going to do to you."
I took 5 points off for the split videos and 7 points off for value since it's a small site. Having said that, I can see this becoming my favorite site and a potential high 90s site.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Very high quality, niche heavy site.
- High percentage of pretty models.
- Lots of download options (on newer scenes), newer videos go up to 1280x720 resolution. Newer photo sets top out at 1600 high end and come zipped.
- Navigation is a little harder than it should be at first. Once you figure it out, it's very easy.
- Could be a con, setting is the same in every scene. Though the room is actually quite pretty and easy on the eyes with its colors.
- Could also be a con. Every scene is of a firm, young woman being massaged then sex. Could be a con for those who bore easily.
Cons:
- I was a little frustrated with the video options. There are some videos with multiple quality options, others with just one, including some newer ones that only have the "ultra HD" option which is usually near 1 GB in size. Also have scenes that are showing unusual resolutions. Will further in BL.
- Nearly every model is slim. I put this because I know there are others who at least like some variety in model shape and size.
- Site is pretty small since "bonus" sites only allowed me to stream.
- Biggest con for me is that the site/scenes lacks much personality. In a one month membership, I did download 27 models, but according to their folder stats, all were done on 3 separate days and what is "hard" about it?
Bottom Line:
I'm approaching this review similar to how I did Teen Mega World. Outside of a few exceptions, nearly all the models here are slim. I know it's probably implied by the 18 in the name of the site, but then again, there's not a lot of "hard" sex here so you get my point. It looks like from the set ratings the more built models are very popular with members. So it surprises me they don't try to get more built models in.
I don't have too much of a problem with formulaic, but the content here is very formulaic, to the point of most of the scenes being predictable right down to the point of being able to guess (within a few minutes) when the massage stops and the sex starts. As with any site with young models, this leads to the model needing to elevate the scene which as we know can be a problem. Some seem really bored. I don't like porn where the male becomes a major part of the dialogue, but neither the male or female do much talking. Not for sure if they're going for a voyeur feel for the viewer, which is possible since the newer scenes have added a "shower" video of each model washing off after the scene. I think it would be even better if they focused on the stripping of the model instead of trying to make the model look nervous and cautious. That's the idea, maybe a scene or two of the model seducing the masseuse into doing more than a massage? Seems like the storylines with this niche are nearly unlimited, woman mad at boyfriend/husband goes to get massage and ends up cheating, seduction, etc...
For some, I would think the biggest complaint is that there isn't anything here that made me think "That's really hard sex". Maybe I should stay away from the Kink sites, but on a 10 scale, I would rate the hardness of these scenes at 5 or below.
The good parts, the models are all very pretty. They are mostly firm and end up oiled, which is always a good thing. I shouldn't say there are only slim models, since I did find 27 attractive enough to download and keep, but the curvier models really do stand out here like Isis Taylor.
I didn't notice the video quality differences until after my membership ran out. The majority of these scenes I have are 1000x564 resolution. Not that I mind that since I prefer 1280x720 max, for hard drive space, but I don't remember if that odd resolution is listed as the highest option. The options can be confusing. Some of the newer videos only have a ultra high video option. For those looking to save hard drive space or who have a slow internet connection those may be a pain to download.
The picture sets seem to follow suit in being confusing. The 1024 zips contain pictures that top out at 1500 long end.
There is one other complaint that I didn't consider a con since it's one that may not bother others and normally doesn't me. This site only updates once per week. They have quite a bit of older scenes that are 640x380 and that's the top resolution available. I understand this type of porn is probably expensive to make, but as others have mentioned Massage Creep does it while offering a full network of other sites to go with it. I also think Brazzers has gotten in on the massage scenes plus they have an entire network too. Why not remaster those older scenes, maybe 1-2 a week to help beef up the "one" update per week? And like a lot of sites, it seems some of the best scenes are only available in the lowest quality.
I did join the site through a promo or probably wouldn't have taken a chance on it. At the current price, I don't see myself returning to it. The varying score applies here too. If you like slim models, massage, add 5 points to the score. If not, subtract 5 points since I was okay with it and kind of in the middle. I like the oily massages.
Overall though, I wasn't that impressed with the content because of the scene to scene sameness which goes beyond formulaic. Most of the models look similar too. So beyond, talk, act apprehensive, fall to the seduction of the massage, have sex, you also get models who are similar build. In a way it reminds me of Amateur Allure where you had the feeling you were watching a guy live out his fantasies by posing as a porn site instead of creating porn people would want to see.
I still would recommend it for one month since the content is exclusive. I just wouldn't have high expectations unless you do prefer slimmer models. This number puts things in perspective. When I was on the site there was 226 models (June 2012). I have 27 model folders from it, so I only downloaded around 12% of the models. I would give more information on the bonus sites, but I only saw stream options for those and didn't fool with them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Interesting site that pushes the limits on high quality.
- Much to my surprise there are some big Euro stars on here including one of my favorites Simony Diamond who is in multiple "games" or scenes and was the biggest reason I joined.
- The limit pushing video quality has 12,000+ bitrates with 1920x1080 resolution videos. I believe that is probably the top quality in the industry as of right now.
- The games are fun to watch. I've seen a few other sites try doing storylines like these, but not as good and not in all their scenes.
- Each game/set also has zipped pictures.
- I'm getting good DL speeds around 90% my DL speed max.
- Webmaster/staff seems to listen and take requests (reasonable ones) into consideration.
Cons:
- I don't mind the subtitles at all, but some probably will.
- They will most likely be walking a fine line by having major stars on the site with hardly heard of stars. As it seems 50% of porn fans want the established stars, the other 50% wants lesser known stars. I would wonder if this niche is harder to book since so many Euro models are not into talking during their shoots.
- Hate to say it, but as much as I appreciate the hard work put into these videos, I still found myself skipping the game parts once I had watched them once.
Bottom Line:
This is a site that leaves me feeling torn. It may very well show the real divide in porn fans. We want highly original porn and this site does that very well, but their amount of content is small and with just 1 full game update per week, it is growing but not that fast. By the end of the 2010 year they'll have roughly 60 games/sets up. It won't be enough for many porn fans. You can even look ahead and see that at their current pace they won't reach 200 sets until the year 2013. The torn part comes into play since you can tell they put a lot of work into the site, into the production of the video, the quality of the videos and in the believability.
You'll be hard-pressed to find a complaint with the technical quality. In that sense, the site reminds me of one of my all-time favorite niche/high quality sites Give Me Pink. Sadly enough, Give Me Pink just didn't have enough support despite their then industry leading technological quality. Hopefully the word will get off enough to support this site and support the originality they promote with their games.
I haven't experienced any slow periods in download speeds, but I have been downloading just 2 sets/video/pictures per day.
I am glad that they're going to start working more American models in. I prefer Euro models, but I think by adding American models they will be able to bring in a whole new group of members who may not have joined with most of the videos not being in English. Simony Diamond really stars (shines?) in the games she is in. She's one of those Euro models who probably coulda, shoulda been a fashion model or actress in mainstream movies and it shows. I'm not usually noticing the male models, but they have some of the best known male talent in Europe with Thomas Stone and Frank Gunn.
Everything here is of the highest quality, original, technically, excellent performers, then there is the but and it's a big one, you end up wanting more. I would imagine they could add maybe a leased DVD section, but that would bring as many complaints as compliments and we're back to being torn.
Their forum/message board is fun to look over and read as are the comments members leave. One of the future sets will have a member present at the shoot, which is a really nice touch. There are just so many things they are doing right that leads me to giving them an 87 despite the small size. I can't imagine deleting any of the scenes from my hard drive so maybe that's a new pro/con to think about "percent of content kept". This is going to be a 100% one. I think if you're looking for something different, original, somewhat funny, then you'll like this site. Though I think my own shallow-mindedness shows when reviewing this site since I admit Simony is the big draw for me even over the originality.
I'm still going to recommend this site since you could do much worse. It's almost like a Behind the Scenes shoot of models playing a game that turns into an orgy. Recommended.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's like a porn scene mixed with a robotics convention mixed with a home improvement show.
- If you're skeptical of women models having orgasms in porn you should join this site. It gets messy.
- Very basic navigation as with most of the Kink sites. It works well, but they could definitely use a more in-depth search.
- Good download speeds, which are needed since some of the HD scenes get into the 1.5 GB range.
- Kind of surprising, but you'll find a lot of the top-tier models on this site.
- This is a hit or miss depending on the girl, but you actually get quite a bit of dirty talk from some of the models. Others fall into the "Oh shit, oh shit, oh shit" annoying talk.
- Kind of reminds me of some of the old Sybian sites. You see a model that seems to hold back in most of her scenes, then she gets on this site, gets a 8 inch dildo stuffed in her by a mechanical contraption and she goes wild. That's a major plus this site offers that very few do.
Cons:
- Kink sites rarely do much wrong and this one falls into that group of not doing much wrong.
- Kink sites can become very repetitive and once again, this site falls into that group.
- 720p is the highest video option available and I do think this is a Kink standard. I've been a member of three of their sites over the last month and none offered 1080p.
- The action can become too hectic at times on this site.
Bottom Line:
You'll never look at your personal drill the same. I discovered this site years and years ago. It was the only Kink site I would join since I thought most of their stuff was too hardcore for my taste.
I'll get those cons out of the way first.
Repetitiveness. It's to be expected with a site like this. I'll admit, I enjoyed this site quite a bit more back when I first reviewed here on PU way back in May 2008. And it's mostly because the scenes today aren't really any different than they were back then.
Too hectic. Dancing Bear. Party Hardcore. Those two sites are too hectic because there's too many people involved and too many switching cameras. This site is too hectic because the machines work so good. You've got machines pounding the woman at X amount of RPMs, she's screaming, stuff is squirting out, dildos are popping out and slamming into their thighs. Some of the girls, a very young Jynx Maze comes to mind, almost seem to have figured the machines out and move in harmony with them. Other girls on here are letting the machines control them.
But hey, it's better than those solo sites where the girl grinds her hips after 10 minutes of masturbation and claims she had an orgasm.
I do think this content is fairly unique even in 2016. There are models who get completely lost in what the machines are doing them. Those are some of the best scenes.
Technically, Kink will always be strong with 720p clear and smooth videos. They do offer smaller resolution too. Pictures are gone, which I also think is a new standard for Kink sites. The scenes start with the model dressed and talking about different things about themselves, their lives, this can last 7-8 minutes in some of the videos. Once that's done there's usually some kind of basic masturbation with a regular dildo or Wand, then the clothes come completely off and the machines are cranked up.
There's no way I could say this for sure as this is a very big site, but it seems like they would leave some of the models in clothes or even just hose, fishnets, during the scene to add a different feel, but I've not seen any that do. Which is where this number comes in:
Over 1,100 completely exclusive videos. Most of the videos are in the 20-30 minute range and I'm guessing that's just because the girls can't take anymore. You'll see a lot of genuine reactions, orgasms, squirting in these videos. You even get the fun of seeing some models blush, giggle and cover their faces when the scene is over and really just act completely different from what they act like in a normal boy/girl or solo scene. That's why you join this site. Much like other Kink sites there's that one thing most of their sites do and it's worth a join to see it.
I should mention that not every scene is solo. Some of the scenes have more than one girl which, in my opinion, only adds to the hectic style of these videos.
It's another departure from normal porn and it's recommended. I join several of their sites each year, once a year and I can say I've been disappointed with any of them.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
