| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
1 By Day
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great Quality
- Unique Content
- Not your typical Scenese
- Fast Downloads |
| Cons: |
- Hardly any hardcore
- Ridiculously bad navigation
- Too much weird stuff |
| Bottom Line: |
Basically, this is an overpriced masturbation site with a sprinkling of hardcore. If you're into good looking women sticking ax handles and gun barrels into themselves then you'll probably give this a better score than me. But in one full week, there was not one new hardcore scene. There's just not enough desirable content to justify the high price.
I'm did this review 1 week into the subscription, and now I'm updating at the end. At this point I feel that this site was a complete waste of money. After pouring throught the archives, there are perhaps only 4 scenes I'd consider exceptional. Way overpriced for 80% masturbation.
I'm editing this again. I created a yahoo mail account just for this purchase. I went in to view my receipt and the mailbox is filled with porn spam. So do not give your real email to these people. |
|
10-04-08 05:35am
Replies (4)
|
Review
2
|
Adult Movie Club
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good quality videos
Lots of content
Lots of bandwidth |
| Cons: |
Some DRM protected content (mostly older stuff)
Disappointing updates
No title or text search
Gay content mixed in |
| Bottom Line: |
Finding something you like on this site can be a chore as their searches are limited in scope. DRM-protected movies (no warning on which are) don't work at all on my MAC. Lightning download speeds and super high-res on all of the latest content. Their updates tend to be bunched by studio or type, so all the updates for 3 days may be something you don't care for. Because of no searching, when you browse a category you have to look at the previews of a lot of stuff you might not want to see (like grannys, trannys and gays). |
|
02-18-07 02:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of Content
- Some very hot sites
- Good Variety of girls |
| Cons: |
-Poor quality video (no HD or DVD quality)
-Not enough updates
-Spam Central |
| Bottom Line: |
This network has some good scenes, but there are a lot of sites and only 1 update per day for the entire network. So if you really like 2 or 3 sites, you might only get a couple of updates per month for those sites. The video quailty is very 2003, although they seem to have removed the DRM.
One thing to note is DO NOT use a real email (create a bogus one in yahoo to get your receipt), as the spam will start coming soon after signing up. I'd give them a higher rating but I hate spammers. As if paying for this low-quality stuff isn't enough that they have to sell your information also.
This site is the old in-out; watch what you like and cancel. |
|
01-14-09 05:32am
Replies (1)
|
Review
4
|
Anjali Uncovered
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Anjali is hot, and she brings in a lot of hot girls to either join her or play with her men. She looks hot with a huge cock in her mouth, and the guys have some really big ones. |
| Cons: |
She talks way too much, and frankly the dirty talk is a turn off. The companion sites generally suck and there are hardly any worthwhile updates. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're into indian chicks, join for a month and suck down the good vids and then move on. The old in-out as they say. |
|
05-12-07 11:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
5
|
Big Tits At School
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Good Quality
- Reality Settings
- Some hot scenes |
| Cons: |
- Too many Overstuffed girls
- Too many 28yos trying to pass as teens
- Same girls over and over |
| Bottom Line: |
Part of the Brazzer's network, this particular site just doesn't do it for me. I guess I just don't get the obvious implant thing, but they need more Amy Reids and less overstuffed slut-types. |
|
10-09-08 05:19am
Replies (1)
|
Review
6
|
Brazzers
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of Content
- Good Download Speeds
- High Quality Videos
- True Reality |
| Cons: |
- Site design could use some work
- too many B rate and below chicks
- too many big fake boobs
- SPAM city |
| Bottom Line: |
The Brazzer's network has a lot of good content but after a couple of weeks you'll run out of things you want to see. There's a handful of hot girls and a lot of bad ones, unless you're into old or fat chicks.
I had to log in every time I visited the site, which was highly annoying. It also required a re-login while navigating after logging in occasionally. Luckily their CAPTCHA doesn't work (simply leaving it blank works fine), so its not as annoying as it could be.
I started to get a TON of spam right after signing up for this service. Luckily I use a bogus yahoo address. I suggest you do the same if you don't want to get buried in SPAM. |
|
08-04-08 08:40am
Replies (1)
|
Review
7
|
Fling.com
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nicely done site. Nudity allowed. Chat rooms with videos. |
| Cons: |
-clunky searching, can't search by last login
-spammer/scammer central
-hideous customer service. My trial didn't *take*, so I had to call 3 numbers and got a guy who I couldn't hear (I think he was in a space module or something). i had to batter customer service to get them to set it up |
| Bottom Line: |
Fling.com would be pretty good if the people on it were real, but for the most part they're not. There are fat chicks on CAM, cute girls on CAM that are paid to hang out in chat rooms all day, and most of the responses you'll get are those girls stuck in Africa, or girls with *webcams* trying to get your credit card info. Most other guys i chatted with thought the site was a complete waste of time as well as a waste of money. |
|
03-08-07 06:13am
Replies (4)
|
Review
8
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Tons of Content
- Hot Girls, and not the same ones over and over
- Entire Barely Legal Library |
| Cons: |
- Search could be better. When searching for a girl it only returns the video and you won't know which scene she is in
- no previews or clips
- not many updates
- quality is only medium
- downloads are medium speed
- can't sort videos so browsing can be tedious
- downloads have DRM if you use the provided download links |
| Bottom Line: |
IMO, Barely Legal is the best porn series ever devised, so most of my points are for access to the 250+ scenes in this series. I also have a tool which allows me to save them without the DRM, so if you dont' have one of those then you might be disappointed. There's about 4 updates a week, thats 4 full videos so 16-20 scenes, but Barely legal updates are only about 1 per month, if that. Quality is watchable but not what you'd hope for from a site in 2007. Searching can be a pain, and there are no previews so you have to start watching each scene to see if its of interest. It could be a lot better, but the content is excellent. Mr Beaver is a hoot. |
|
06-23-07 10:21am
Replies (0)
|
Review
9
|
Matt's Models
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of models
Models are wholesome, no tattoed pierced skanks
Relatively inexpensive |
| Cons: |
Few of the models are model-quality
poor photography
most of the videos are poor quality |
| Bottom Line: |
The first thing here is that the name of the website implies that "Matt" is a photographer, but clearly he's not. Not only the models are amateurs, but so is the photographer. Red-eye in most of the photos, many of the photos aren't scaled properly. And the sequences aren't interesting. You'd think after photographing so many girls he'd develop some sort of style.
Some of the sets look like they've been decorated from a dumpster; he's got to be making some money from this, so the poor photographer excuse shouldn't apply here. If you're a horny guy in your 20s you'll probably love this site, but there aren't enough girls on here that I'd be dying to see naked. |
|
09-22-07 08:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
10
|
MC Nudes
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of Content
- Good Quality Images
- Fast Downloads
- Nice Layout |
| Cons: |
- Lousy Photography
- Disappointing Model Quality
- Can't download just the photos you like |
| Bottom Line: |
For the price of a full fledged porn site, you can see a bunch of amateur girls who can't pose to save their lives. You'd think in the silicone age a nude photography site would have more women with outstanding boobs; but the pickings are slim. Some of the shoots are so embarrassing that there isn't one decent pose. When shooting nudes, its important to control body lines. Most of the sessions are just a bunch of shots with no apparent plan. Lastly, you have to download the entire tarball in order to get the full-sized images, and then its a pain to find the one you wanted. |
|
02-06-08 12:46pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
11
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of Content
Good Bonus Sites
Hot Chicks |
| Cons: |
Low Quality Video
Clunky View/Download setup
Watch/Download links only for clips
Cryptic UserIDs and Passwords
Doesn't Work well on a MAC |
| Bottom Line: |
The new user interface raises this from an annoying site in the 60s to a high 70s IMO. But they still have some issues. Still with the cryptic user IDs, and you still have to log in 3 times your first time in. Navigation is clunky. Its just poorly thought-out in general.
Download speeds have been dramatically increased recently. However, the video launch/authentication doesn't work on a MAC with Flippit WMV plug-in, so the entire clip has to be downloaded in order to view.
They have a lot of good content, but their site still needs some work. Some advice to the owners; spend some of the money you're making on a real programmer with a proven track record on user interface rather than the usual clunk-heads that do porn sites. |
|
11-16-07 05:55am
Replies (0)
|
Review
12
|
Mr Big Dick's Hot Chicks
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good Content with hot chicks
- Some attempt at a story line
- a lot of scenes |
| Cons: |
- Hardly any updates
- Poor Quality Videos
- Best quality is flash, which are not savable |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is part of a large package (Allrealitypass) and there is only 1 update for the entire package per weekday (none on weekends). The quality is not HD and all but the most recent movies are very low quality.
I have a particular problem with sites that have better quality trailers than the actual movies. It seems like an obvious effort to deceive, and thats always a negative. The truth is, once you've hit the archives there's really nothing to keep you wanted to renew here. Another 1 month wonder. |
|
12-07-08 06:46am
Replies (1)
|
Review
13
|
Mr. Biggz
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Lots of content
-Good quality on newer videos
-Good download speeds
-Hot chicks |
| Cons: |
-Older videos can only be downloaded in segments
-Only real good quality on latest videos
-Most of the companion sites are worthless
-Not enough updates |
| Bottom Line: |
The first thing to say is that the dude pictured on the Mr. Biggz ads only appears in the first third of the content. There's a new dude making the new ones. Still a big black cock. The girls are hot for the most part. Heavy Hangers, Jizz Bomb and Mr Biggz are the only worthwhile sites and they only get 1 update a week at most. So there isn't enough here to keep you going past the first month. The Nacho site is very disappointing as there are no updates, low quality vids, no full movie download and the chicks are mediocre looking. |
|
05-12-07 12:59pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
14
|
Ox Pass
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of Content
- Decent Download Speed
- Regular Updates |
| Cons: |
- Medium Quality video
- Repetitive Story lines
- Too many mediocre-looking chicks
- Started to get a lot of porn SPAM after joining
- Same dudes and chicks over and over |
| Bottom Line: |
I suppose the rude, low-class style is intended, but if you don't like skanky chicks this may not site for you. The same guys with the same mediocre girls gets old fast. The price isn't bad, and the updates are regular, but because of the diversity of the sites, its likely that only 2 or 3 of them will appeal to any given customer. Also note that you'll get an offer to remain for $19.99 when you cancel, so you might as well cancel during the first month to save some $$$ if you intend to stay. |
|
02-16-08 06:47am
Replies (0)
|
Review
15
|
Pornstars Like It Big
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- good quality
- good range of women
- good download speeds |
| Cons: |
- not so believable reality
- too many average looking girls |
| Bottom Line: |
Its not terribly believable that women who fuck big cocks for a living are going to go nutty over yet-another big cock, so it beats the old striptease and then guy-comes-in-room-for-sex type of scene. You won't find too many great ones, but several are very hot. |
|
09-24-08 02:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
16
|
Restrained Elegance
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- good amount of content
- daily updates
- glamour bondage only |
| Cons: |
- poor quality videos
- most of the "new" material is useless
- the break one "scene" up and call it multiple updates
- same models over and over
- videos don't work in Safari |
| Bottom Line: |
The point of bondage with hot women is to arouse sexuality, and most of the content on this site doesn't. Many of the "scenes" just seem half-baked; not enough "real" bondage. The videos are grainy and don't work in Safari. The photography isn't very good, and most of the photo sets don't have one really good photo. It just seems half-baked; like they are going through the motions to generate content without having any real ideas as to how to entertain their clientele. |
|
03-16-08 07:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
17
|
Teens Like It Big
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Hot girls
- great quality
- fast downloads
- true reality |
| Cons: |
- Silly dialogue |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a very hot sequence of scenes featuring mostly gorgeous girls going gaga over big cocks. While its hot for them to say "its soooo big", they don't really need to say it 15 times. They overdo it a bit, but the scenes are great. |
|
09-24-08 02:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
18
|
VideoBox
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good quality Videos
- Good navigation and searching
- Lots of updates |
| Cons: |
- too much odd content
- not enough reality type content
- bandwidth limited downloads (8/2008) |
| Bottom Line: |
While videobox offers several updates per day, so much of the content is weird stuff like midgets and squirting and fat chicks that it may be 3 days before there is something you want to see. Also, most of the content are those tiresome scenes with interview-masturbastion-dude shows up-sex with nothing to grab interest. Personally I prefer a bit of a storyline.
I cancelled my second subscription (8/2008) just in time, as it seems they've started to bandwidth limit downloads. Its too consistent to be congestion, and I simply can't get more than 700Kb/s on any download from there site. I've confirmed that i can download from other sites. Unfortunately, the speed that they allow isn't fast enough to watch DVD content in real-time, so its a huge negative. |
|
07-14-07 01:08pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
19
|
VideosZ
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Updated: |
03-10-10 08:51am (Update History)
Reason: Final conclusions
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content
Newer Videos have good quality |
| Cons: |
-False Advertising
-Many videos not available at all
-They seem to buy videos that no-one else wants - too many chicks that aren't all that attractive
-"New" Releases are often videos that are 10 years old.
-Too many scenes are poor quality even on high quality download
-I hate their flash viewer
-you have to frequently log back in |
| Bottom Line: |
I was a member of this once before, so I guess its my fault for giving them another chance. I found something on this site that I'd been trying to find for a while, and the "Free Preview" shows that its available for download. After joining, it shows "Coming Soon" which basically means "sorry charlie, we fooled you".
A large number of videos are not available. You waste tons of time finding something and then find out its not available. Or sometimes the quality is so bad its not worth watching. Their "New Releases" are new only to the site. On March 1, 2010 College Girls Do 4, a video from 1999 was presented as new. Do I want to see Julie Meadows before she got her boobs done? I guess they get better deals buying old videos that nobody else wants. There's no way to sort on ACTUAL release date. So you have to sift through all of the old garbage. Virtually none of their "new" releases are new.
Their viewer will not allow you to advance the playhead past whats been downloaded. If you do, it terminates and you have to start over. This means you can't jump past the interview or the masturbation or whatever. A real time waster.
If you buy the argument that our most valuable asset is time, this site wastes more of your time than any other I've been on. You search for something you want, and then you find out its "Coming Soon". There is so much garbage; so many unattractive women, that it takes a long time to find anything really good. Then you find out that the video was encoded 5 years ago and the quality is unwatchable. Or if you find something and you don't feel like watching 10 minutes of ass-licking you can't jump past it in their viewer.
They still have login problems. You'll be navigating around and
for no apparent reason you'll get the invitation to join page.
Another time waster and annoyance.
They get the lowest score mainly because they falsely present videos on the preview that are not available when you pay. Cheats get the lowest score. Otherwise I'd give them high 50s, mainly because they don't have real new releases, and because 2/3 of their content is encoded in low quality.
*** UPDATE ***
My month is just about up now, so I wanted to report 2 things:
1) All 3 of the videos I was interested in when I first joined are still not available, despite Clement's claim that they would be done in 2 weeks.
2) They are still advertising the videos as being available before you log in only to be Coming Soon once you do log in. So clearly they are comfortable baboozling people and they think they make more money with such a practice than they do with an honest approach.
I'm very comfortable giving them the lowest possible rating. So I guess we're even.
*** Final Update ***
None of the videos that I was interested in that were tagged "Coming Soon" when I joined was availabe on the last day of the membership. So don't believe them when they tell you it will be available in 2 weeks. Its just not the truth. |
|
02-21-10 02:09pm
Replies (15)
|
Review
20
|
VideosZ
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Lots of Content
good (not great) quality on downloads |
| Cons: |
Terrible customer service
cryptic userids and passwords
have to enter passwords over and over
slow downloads
xvid and flash video formats are annoying
searching needs to be improved |
| Bottom Line: |
When you join a site, you want to start using it right away, not 4 hours later. It took *hours* before I could access videos. My ID worked after 10 minutes (as they state), but there were 0MB of videos available for 3 hours. I received no response from customer service in the 3 hours (normal business hours). The formats vary from movie to movie. Xvid was not happy on my MAC; i had to download and launch VNC to watch some of them. The flash format was low quality. There aren't enough search categories and you can only search on one category (no interracial + asian for example). There is no scene search. When you search for an actress you get the videos they are in and have to cobble through the scenes.
The bottom line is that the site is a bad version of videobox at a much higher price. There's really no reason to join this one as there are way too many negatives. |
|
08-08-07 08:34am
Replies (2)
|
Review
21
|
Vivid
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of potentially excellent content.
You'll only blow $10 trying it out. |
| Cons: |
The quality is TERRIBLE. Not just bad, but purposely terrible. They really want you to buy DVDs. Crappy, streaming-only content. They also have only a subset of Vivid content, and there are no dates and no date sorting, so you can't tell if a video is new or from 1998. |
| Bottom Line: |
To me, it doesn't matter how good the content is if you can't see it. Its 2007 and there is no excuse for such poor quailty videos. New content actually has LOWER quality than some of the older stuff. They lowered their price and the quality at the same time. As far as I'm concerned, I might just as well have crumpled up a $10 bill and threw it out the window.
Follow-Up:
As a follow-up, I'm receviing a tremendous amount of SPAM from the address given to the vivid.com site. I use different yahoo addresses for each sign-up, so I'm certain that they are the ones who gave out the address. So drop another 10pts from the review. |
|
06-06-07 02:52pm
Replies (2)
|
