| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s included when you join Exploited College Girls and vice-versa.
Definite amateur models and a black couch that’s in the backroom.
Models are mostly pretty and a lot of them, especially newer ones, are funny and cute. There are over 700 models.
Scenes are full featured, is that a term? Interview, tease, sex, it’s all in one scene.
Updates a little more than once per week, I’m counting around 6 per month.
Good blend of models (race, body types, kinkiness level) |
| Cons: |
It's similar to Exploited College Girls, there’s really not a lot they are doing wrong. They do have a download limit listed, but I haven’t hit it. It looks high to me with 25GB per day. I’m not a hoarding downloader. I download what I know I can watch.
Shouldn’t it be repetitive if the women are amateurs and new to the porn field? There seems to be a line you can’t cross with newbies to porn modeling. I think the viewer accepts that to get to see new, fresh models. |
| Bottom Line: |
These two sites – Backroom Casting Couch and Exploited College Girls are a real find for me. I seem to only want to stay in my comfort zone of mostly glam, softer content and it’s not for lack of trying. I have tried many hardcore sites and wished I hadn’t. These sites walk that fine line between, “You’re trying to see how much of her innards you can pull out” and “That’s just two people have fun, passionate sex.” It may be because I’m a woman. This site does it as well as Exploited College Girls.
The models are probably a bigger deal to females than males. I know that sounds dumb since I’m not a lesbian, but it’s not just about looks. I think as a woman, I want to think young women just kind of stumble into porn. Like I did the backseat of that guy’s car in college. These scenes give me that feeling. The ladies do a good enough job of showing up in what looks like a casual outfit for a job interview. The guys are not enough asshole to make me feel like they’re really trying to exploit these young women. As I told in the Exploited College Girls review, the girls wear the guys in the newer scenes. It’s nice to see the shift happening in porn. It didn’t have to be a major shift. It could be progressive to show women can be horny too. It does make me laugh since these guys are handing money out. Maybe someone could make a porn site where they have a bet with the woman. If they can get her to have sex without pay, then she won’t ask for pay. You know the webmasters would be all for that. They’re placing personal ads for smooth-talking men. I have always believed that pay takes away from the realism in porn. Maybe everyone does have a price. That is where typical hardcore does not do well with me. I start thinking there’s no way she agreed to this. She’s just doing it to get her money. That loses me. This site and Exploited College Girls, don’t give me that feeling.
The scenes can be downloaded in HD. There are pictures. The navigation is basic and simple as it should be for a site like this. I find looking at each woman to be one of the most interesting parts. A lot of these women do not look like they have plans to be in 10,000 porn scenes. I do believe the most interesting is when you get the woman that looks like she shouldn’t be in porn, and I mean that in the way that she looks like a potential Hollywood actress. You also get the other side of that woman would probably shoot a new scene every week.
The tags work well even though I don’t use them. I just start at the beginning and pick 6-10 scenes to download and watch over a week period. I think considering they give you this site and Exploited College Girls this could be a long term join for me. If you combine the sites, they are updating 12 times a month and have over 1,500 scenes between the sites. They do give you a third site too. I haven’t checked the third site out just because of the name. It’s Black Ambush. That has the sound of every site that has turned me away from hardcore. I will eventually check it out, but for now I’m happy with Exploited College Girls and Backroom Casting Couch.
I would definitely recommend joining either and getting both to any porn fan. I did score Exploited College Girls a little higher, but you get both sites so there’s no reason to prefer one of the other when you can have both. |
|
05-11-22 04:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Most of the models have a very natural "girl next door" look to them
-The acting is pretty good for a porn site
-Free access to exploitedcollegegirls.com if you remain a member for a second month
-The site sticks with their theme
-Site navigation is very easy
-Good download speeds (I got between 700Kb and 800Kb per second without using any sort of download manager or speed accelerator) |
| Cons: |
-It costs $29.49 per month, but there are currently only 61 scenes posted
-Video quality is slightly lower than the steller quality vids that most good sites are putting out these days
-No pictures or vid caps (All videos) |
| Bottom Line: |
This site a lot like the backroomfacial.com site that was part of the bangbros network about 6 years ago (Except this site is a little lighter on the degradation aspect).
What really makes this site great in my opinion is that they go the extra mile to sell you the illusion that the girl is just some chick looking into an add she saw and ends up getting tricked into having sex on camera without getting paid for it.
First off, most of the models look no different than the average college girl. Also, the acting was sufficient enough for me to buy into the idea that the girl does not know exactly what she is getting herself into when she shows up for the interview.
Second, sticking with the site's theme, every scene is shot in the same room, with the same guy, and he gives every girl the same spiel about how she can make $1,000 to $5,000 a day doing porn, but she has to prove she can take directions well and perform on the spot before she gets the job. What is NOT the same in every scene is how the girl reacts to this dude's sales pitch. Some girls are eager to prove they are the perfect girl for the job, some reluctantly go through with his demands, and a few even walk out on him.
Last, but not least, is the quantity and quality of videos. As stated in the cons, this site only has 61 videos as of today. The wide majority of scenes are between 20 and 40 minutes long and are between 200MB and 300MB in size. The visual quality is not bad, but not the steller quality that most sites are putting out these days. In my opinion, the slightly lower visual quality helps feed into the amateur feel of the scene. However, below are some stats from one of the vids that I downlowded to help you decide for yourself whether the quality is acceptable or not. Also, the quality of the sample vids on the preview page are representative of the quality of the members area vids.
Audio: Windows Media Audio 44100Hz stereo 96Kbps [Raw Audio 0]
Video: Windows Media Video 9 576x324 29.97fps 1100Kbps [Raw Video 1]
Bottom line, in my opinion, as far as content goes, this is my favorite site on the net today. The only reason I gave it an 89 is because I just can't justify giving a score of 90 or higher to a site that has a price tag of $29.49 but only provides 61 scenes. However, if they keep up with their weekly updates, and the quality of content stays the same as it is right now, it will be in the high 90's on my scale within a year from now. |
|
04-25-09 11:14pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
3
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Around 500 videos in total with updates coming in about once a week. That said a lot of the older scenes are pretty poor quality, so I'd say you get around 200-300 good quality HD videos. Around 350-370 of the scenes have some anal if you care about that.
- Almost entirely amateur models, some of the girls in teh first videos have gone on to shoot other stuff but lots of girls I have not seen on any other site.
- For the most part really attractive girls with a very distinct "girl next door" look. The models clearly do their own hair/ makeup and choose their outfits because it ranges from really sexy well put together outfits to girls that look like they rolled out of bed and threw together whatever they had around. Overall it's kind of a nice change from the polished look of some sites.
- Network access to a handful of similar sites, most notable ExCoGi and Black Ambush.
- Decent preview, that gives a decent idea of what you get when you sign up. |
| Cons: |
- The premise is really not that interesting. The whole spiel is that the girls come in for an interview and they get "tricked" or lured into having hardcore sex with the promise of "high paying porn jobs". The models don't seem to buy it (most just go "ok, whatever"), the guy running the interview isn't particularly convincing, you, as the audience roll your eyes and skip forward in the interview. I don't get why they keep it up instead of just doing regular casting videos. I feel like at this point it's just annoying.
- No photos of any kind
- Site is pretty bare bones. I have been an on and off member since 2010 and the site looks the same now as it did back then. Actually I think they added some more ads for other sites. You only have an option to download videos in 2 sizes, the category section is pretty simple and while everything works there's not a lot of extra features. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are considering this site and are really concerned about the price I would strongly recommend you read pat362's expired review, while there are more videos now, a lot of his negative comments still hold true. The site still has the silly premise of "tricking" girls, the interviews can be hit or miss depending on the girl, the videos are still shot in the office with the black couch and so on. (Although for the last few years they started using another male model "Vince" who seems to be doing a much better job switching positions and fucking the girls energetically).
IF you are looking for really professionally shot videos of dolled up models this is not the best site for you. The girls here are clearly amateurs and sometimes the interviews are painfully awkward (on the flip side you get some really cool girls that are very open and uninhibited) The camera work is really good for a small site, but it's clearly not the elaborate production of a large network, and on the technical side the site is alright, but won't win any design awards.
All that out of the way, this is still one of my favorite sites. The models are absolutely awesome, even the awkward ones :) they don't put on fake porn moans, they are wearing their regular clothes, sometimes they get into the sex, sometimes they are clearly not that interested. As far as unscripted sex it's some of the best stuff I've found. Sometimes a girl really gets into the anal action and sometimes they end the scene pretty quickly after that since she clearly said she's not interested, almost every scene has a different vibe and while pretty silly the interviews before and after the action are sometimes awesome at showcasing the girl's personality.
Now, before my final paragraph I have a final disclaimer. As some other people mentioned the action is a bit formulaic and I honestly wish they had a bed so they could get more creative, but generally each scene follows the following format: 8-10 minute interview and intro, the girl strips and masturbates (depends on the girl how long) Vince usually helps her insert an anal toy or eats them out. Then she gives a blowjob for a few minutes and they have sex on the table in doggy or with the girl on her back, then there's a pause while they get ready for anal and the video shows a side-by-side view of the insertion and the girl's face. They move to the couch and either go at it in anal or have a cream-pie. The last 2-3 minutes are the girl dressing and/or an exit interview. All in all each scene is about 30-50 minutes. For me this is not a downside, but it depends on what you're looking for. It's definitely not focused on long blowjobs, rough sex or intense anal. If you're looking for one of those niches there are better sites out there.
So overall, while the site is clearly not for everyone there are some awesome scenes here with some very natural models and unscripted moments. What sold me on it were all the anal scenes, but what kept me subscribed were the great models and genuine reactions. |
|
12-03-18 03:12pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
4
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent site in a relative under-served niche
- 165 scenes
- Updating regularly
- Many good looking models
- Most models are amateur
- ome porn stars early in their careers
- Now uploading in 1280p
- Packaged with another excellent amateur site
- Male talent who never tries to upstage the models
- Excellent camerawork and editing
- Innovative use of split screen and picture-in-picture
- Supports download managers
- Bills through CCBill |
| Cons: |
- Only the most recent updates are HD. Older scenes can be low resolution |
| Bottom Line: |
Lately Ive developed an interest in casting videos and this is one of the better sites in that niche. A membership here includes a membership to two other sites: Exploited College Girls and Net Video Girls. ECG is a great site and makes a membership here better. NVG isnt terrible, but, in my opinion, it is the weakest site of the three. I should point out that the TBP review doesnt say anything about the additional sites but Ive joined twice now and both times that was the deal. I just checked again and it is still being offered.
The sites premise is that a guy passes himself off as a porn agent and has women come by to talk about getting into the business. The setting is an office and the scene is recorded using two cameras on tripods and a handheld POV camera. The agent explains the business to the model and then she is encouraged to make a demo tape that the agent will then use to get work for her. The demo consists of the model getting naked, masturbating, performing oral on the agent and then getting fucked. Many of the scenes have some anal sex but it is usually short. Even if you arent as big a fan of anal as I am, the anal isnt obtrusive. Some may criticize the site as being too formulaic. It is that, but in my opinion, the formula works so why fix what isnt broken?
Most of the models are unknown to me, though there are a few who went on to porn careers. Tanner Mayes (as Evangeline), Kacey Jordan, Shawna Lenee (as Kara), Amia Miley and Chastity Lynn are here, early in their careers. While there is no way that the premise could be real (given the paperwork involved to do porn), the models play the role well and really add to the feel of the scene. There is some variety in models with different body types, though the majority are Caucasian and petite. Most of the models are very good looking. There are a few videos with pregnant models if youre into that.
There have been negative comments about the male agent. I dont share those opinions because I find that he knows that members arent joining to see him so he is unobtrusive.
Using two stationary cameras and a POV camera could be the sites weak point, but it isnt. The camera work and editing are great and really work well for the atmosphere. One feature that I really like is the use of split screen or picture-in-picture. For example, the model may be bent over the desk in a standing doggy position and one half of the screen is a camera pointing at her face while the other half is the POV camera held above the models ass.
There are currently about 165 videos on the site with most being about 30 minutes long. The site does update regularly, but since my membership expired four days ago I cant confirm the update schedule but my recollection is that it is at least one new scene per week.
The scenes are only available in one file type, WMV, but they are available as clips or as the full scene. There are usually two resolutions available (labelled as high and low). I only downloaded the highest resolution full scenes so I cant comment on the lower resolution or clips.
Speaking of resolution, there is good news and bad news. The good news is that the site appears to have undergone a re-work and at the same time it looks like the last 12-15 uploads are available in 1280x720 at 3500kb/s and 29 fps. These look great. File sizes are between 500-800MB, though there are a few that hit a gigabyte. The bad news is that before the site started uploading HD the resolutions were lower. With a lot of the older scenes on the site that can be pretty low. Most are 768x432 (which still look good), some are 576x324, some are 640x360 and some 480x360. Obviously the smaller resolution files were uploaded a long time ago and dont look good by todays standards.
The site supports download managers and I had no issues with links timing out. I didnt encounter any speed reductions or download limits. The site bills through CCBill.
The bottom line is that this is an excellent site if you like this niche. Its packaged with another excellent site (and a mediocre one too). The models are good looking and the scenes are fun to watch. The production values are good with good camerawork and editing. While the site has started uploading HD videos that was only recently so most of the videos are of lower resolution. Not only do I highly recommend this site but it is on my list of sites to regularly rejoin to download new scenes. |
|
12-30-13 10:24am
Replies (14)
|
Review
5
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some attractive ladies
-No DRM
-Reasonable sized collection, 128 scenes at the time of review
-Interesting concept, most of the talent plays around pretty well
-Newer stuff is good video quality, 620x360 WMV with 4500 kbps total bitrate
-Download speeds are good if you use a download manager, not so great through browser (300 KB/sec browser, 900 KB/sec with manager)
-Bills through CCBill, didn't have any experience with customer service
-Exclusive content, including some ladies I hadn't seen before anywhere |
| Cons: |
-No real navigation to speak of, just a list of the sets. However, pretty much every model only appears once.
-Site is very very bland, nothing really there except the long list of scenes (unsortable) and a link to friends' sites.
-No photosets at all
-Camerawork can be iffy, since it is mostly filmed with the combination of POV and a tripod, the angles aren't always good - and the guy sometimes gets up to move the camera around (they don't edit this part out)
-Sort of expensive given the amount of content
-Not all download managers work (DTA did, GetRight didn't)
-No bonus content
-The video quality of the older sets is pretty poor - worst I saw was 480x360 1800 kbps.
-Infrequent updates, only one per week
-Oddly the guy blurs out his face with a big blurry Japanese mosaic kind of thing, which can be a bit distracting.
-Model attractiveness is variable, and there are LOTS of tattoos. |
| Bottom Line: |
For what this site is I think it is pretty decent. Its main drawbacks are the older content's quality, the price, and the size of the site. If they merged this site with their sister site (Exploited College Girls) for the same price, the site would defintely become more reasonably priced.
The site has an interesting concept, and there are even a few scenes where the girls decide to back out, which adds some realism I suppose. The concept for the most part is that he tells the girls they can make 1k-5k per day doing private videos for his customers that only the customer will ever see - but of course he has to kick the tires on the ladies first.
Considering the style of site, I didn't find the dude to be that much of a jackass, compared to similar sites like BangBros - where you want to strangle the dude behind the camera.
If you aren't into this kind of setup, you will probably find the site to be lacking, as the camerwork is pretty bad in places, but if you do enjoy this kind of thing it might be worth joining - but just for a month, I don't know why anyone would get their multi-month membership, I don't think you get any bonus sites with that membership either.
Basically a decent site, and he certainly got some attractive ladies - too bad about the tattoos in many cases (what is with that huge fucking teddy bear on Danni Cole's back, shit!). The ladies are mostly American from what I can tell, and not a lot of ethnic diversity here - almost all white. I downloaded about 25 scenes that I plan to keep, amongst those there are about 5 that will be added to my favorites (including the Danni Cole scene, and a Rilee Jensen scene that were both pretty good).
If you are into casting call type scenes, this is definitely a site to consider. Although it could certainly use some improvements, and perhaps a lower price, I'd say it is worth a one month membership. |
|
07-27-10 04:49pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
6
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- about 130 videos and a new one every Tuesday evening. Unfortunately the videos are all different sizes, quality and can either be mpg or wmv, some of them only one or the other.
- some seriously hot girls. Look through the tour to see some very cute girls, and if you look on the porn tubes you can usually find one or two previews to his videos (only the highlights, for the good stuff you have to join)
- the scenes seem very unscripted, it's just a dude with a camera and a girl. Which means that sometime he runs around setting stuff up or he chats with the girl while she lubes herself, if you like that kind of real, pierre woodman-like stuff that you'll love this site. If you prefer perfect light, professional zoom-ins and generally more mainstream stuff, this might put you off. On the other hand seeing a girl hold a camera and then seeing how it shakes as she cums (and either they are incredible actors or they really cum) makes this site very unique. |
| Cons: |
- Download speeds can be slow at times. I got anywhere from 50kb to 900, no clue why or how.
- Whole site is very amateur-ish, just like the content. There is one video were he even says he accidentally forgot to turn on one camera so we just get one angle. I thought it was funny, but other people might feel cheated out.
-Some girls only do solo (only one or two, but still a tag system would have been nice) Unfortunately the site has no search and the descriptions are not always very clear. I remember for one girl he says he can't believe she does anal, well she doesn't :)
-Some girls are not first time on video. Nicole Ray and Chastity are both professional models and I bet a few more of the girls are too, kinda shame really since the amateurs are so much cutter. There is one read head soccer mom who tries anal and her scene is incredibility hot.
- No photos, really a shame.
- No bonus sites. I understand a year or two back the site came in a package, no more |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has two very big bonuses going for it. Hot amateur girls. Many of the models are truly shy and a bit uncomfortable and it shows, also the guy is not a huge douche like other porn models. I think I mentioned this before but he closely resembles Pierre Woodman, he is there to convince these girls to have sex on camera, but he won't abuse them more than they want to be abused and that makes the whole video a lot more enjoyable. Going back to that hot read-head soccer mom I mentioned before, she tries anal and is clearly uncomfortable and he immediately stops the scene instead of pushing it. The whole moment along with the look on her face lets you know this is real, unscripted sex, but with much better camera work than a truly amateur scene.
Oh and there is also the twitter, which the guy uses to posts future interviews and ask for feedback, very nice usage of the web 2.0 media.
Unfortunately, here is where the good things stop and I have to mention the very plain site design, the lack of bonus features, the lack of a decent search button and the fact that we don't get photo-sets. For the same price I pay here I can get a Nubiles or Little Mutt subscription and get three times the content. It's true those sites don't have the interviews and the whole "real" setting, but then again you can join woodmanX and get similar content and a lot more of it (then again woodman is more expensive and not all scenes are in English).
So, the bottom line? I love the site, but I can see how many people wouldn't feel the same way. It lacks in features and if you don't LOVE the pov, interview, reality kinda videos these will leave you feeling a bit cheated. I for one will download a bunch of the videos and probably join back in a year or so for the updates, in the mean time I am following the twitter feed and will enjoy that incredibly hot read-head (did I mention here already ? I feel like I did :). |
|
08-16-10 11:10pm
Replies (12)
|
Review
7
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- There's a backroom, a couch and girls wanting money or to become pornstar. What could go wrong?
- The girls are mostly attractive.
- Nearly 600 videos.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max)
- CCBill is the biller
- Some of the scenes feature good personalities.
- An update each week |
| Cons: |
- Well, as I enter my third month with this group of sites, they've decided to take a few sites away from me. I no longer have access to Net Video Girls or Casting Couch HD, thanks guys, there's you a 15 point deduction. No explanation needed. You don't remove access to sites you were previously including. You did and that's why I removed points.
- A lot of these scenes are dull. ExCoGi was much better.
- No pictures. Why does an amateur site not have pictures?
- It doesn't feel like they put as much into this site as ExCoGi and definitely not as much as Net Video Girls. |
| Bottom Line: |
I reviewed Exploited College Girls a few weeks ago and was very high on it and the package of sites included with it. One was Net Video Girls, one of my favorite amateur sites, now, without any kind of notice they removed Net Video Girls from the package of sites. They also removed Casting Couch HD from the package. I see they are now selling Net Video Girls with Casting Couch HD as a package.
I even made sure by trying to sign in to Net Video Girls with my credentials and it wouldn't sign in. I won't be reducing the Exploited College Girls school as I think it's a very unique and interesting site. This Backroom Casting Couch gets to start out with a -15 deduction. I don't want to go too far into the reasoning other than saying I chose to do business with these sites for 3 straight months, even allowing the membership to recur at $29.95 in the last two months of it. I could have just canceled it in month one and signed up with a promo with a different email address for month two. Their appreciation is to remove my access to the best site they have, Net Video Girls.
I'm really tired of having to write negative reviews because of terrible business practices. See, Backroom Casting Couch is not a bad site at all but now, I'm in a bad mood and feel like I can't trust them. It makes me see the faults.
My first pro says a lot. There's a couch in a backroom. The guy casts a willing amateur woman for porn. The enjoyable, entertaining style of Exploited College Girls isn't found here. The women look bored, not all but most of the recent ones, they roll around on the couch showing their 46 tattoos and it feels just as cheap as the recent women look. I'm going to be as fair as possible and say 1/2 of the women are okay. The other 1/2 should be paying me to watch them get naked.
The good looking ones are in the 8-9 range on an amateur scale.
There are no pictures. I try not to be too old-fashioned about porn but pictures of amateurs is one of the top reasons to join an amateur site. Would it really be that much to ask? I think anyone would agree the interview section of these scenes is not near as good as Exploited College Girls, another of their sites. Use that time to take 50-75 pictures. It has been a long time since I said this and maybe I should apologize before saying it. Some of these women look a lot better dressed.
If you think I'm being too harsh on the models go look for yourself. Of the last 15, Chanel is cute, Summer is cute with an even better personality, Leya and Jasmine are pretty, the other 11 are average or below. I think baseball is the only profession where 4 out of a 15 isn't terrible.
The video quality is very good with up to 1080p. The videos are long as I have explained before these long videos at a high resolution make for huge file sizes. One I downloaded earlier was 4.3 GB for the 1080p version. They also offer 720p and an unspecified resolution version that is smaller in file size. The ones I tested in the unspecified group were 768x432, so below 480p. Those can even be as big as 1 GB.
With no photos there is nothing to list about their quality.
I'm taking this directly from their site. This is one of transcribed conversations they list from one of the scenes:
Rick: I'm going to have you start by licking his ass.
Kim: What.. What??!! Are you serious?! Are you fuckin' serious?... ok, whatever..God... I don't wanna do that. I really have to do that?
Rick: That's what we do here. Welcome to porn.
We're back to way to go, guys. I think I would have edited out the part where she said she doesn't want to do that and asked again if she really has to. You walk a fine-line in this business. Holding money over someone's head to get them to do something they don't want to do isn't on the right side of that line.
I'm still not going to give it a terrible score. It has its good moments but I won't be back. |
|
08-05-19 11:51pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
8
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have a nice mix of female body types.
-Many of the girls are amateurs or new to the porn biz.
-Nearly 150 videos.
-Videos appear to all be wmv.
-You can use a download manager. |
| Cons: |
-No photos of any kind.(screencaps would have been nice).
-Only one page so you have to keep scrollig down to find the next videos.
-You can only download 4 videos and that's with or without a download manager.
-All the scenes are POV and he uses a couple of cameras to give you different perspectives but the editing is so bad that some of the shot are of the guy playing with the camera while many of the others ones show bad angles of the action.
-All the scenes are filmed in the same office the desk or the floor.
-The guy never stops talking and that's fine in the interview part but you would hope that once the actions starts that he'd shut-up.
-The guy doesn't want to be identified so you have a pixelated circle whenenever there is a chance that we might see his face. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site has some good looking girls and most of these have never made it unto my porn radar so I was curious to see them in action. After having joined this site then I can honestly say, that I'm still curious to see them in action.
I'm glad that this guy has money to get girls to have sex with him on camera and his choice of girls is very good but I wish he cared enough about his customers to allow us to see them in action. Get a camera man or get a performer but don't try to be both.
If you want to see some really cute amateurs have sex and don't mind talking during the sex and the less than stellar camera shots then you might enjoy this site. |
|
12-11-10 07:09pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
9
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif.
+there are more than 190 scenes.
+The vast majority of the girls are amateurs and this is one of the few places you'll see them do hardcore.
+They have a wide variety of teen models. |
| Cons: |
-They don't seem to updating very often but I can't say how often they do because they don't put dates on their content.
-The videos can only be downloaded in WMV and resolution is a rather poor 640x360.
-All the videos are shot in POV and the guy doesn't really know how use a camera.
-The interview part of the video is a complete waste of time and pure BS.
-All the scenes are shot in the same office and on the same couch and desk.
-There is no editing so a good chunk of the video is the guy moving the camera or tripod around the room.
-The sex is mediocre at best.
-Still no pics of any kind. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I only joined this site because I got a deal when I joined exploited college girls because you also get this one. This is my second time on this site and it will also be my final time.
*The premise for the site is very interesting and someone with talent should be able to make a killing but the guy responsible for this mess either doesn't have any talent or simply doesn't care about the final product. You would think that someone who's been doing this for as long as he has would get better with time but I did not see a difference between the newer videos and the older stuff.
*All the flaws that were there in 2010 are still there. You have the stupid interview where it's hard to believe the BS being said. You have his hiden face whenever it's in the shot. The videos are all POV and tripod shot so that's already a negative. There are many bad camera angles, weird cut in the action, bad camera position during the action so that the shots are wasted, he likes to talk during the video.
*Shooting in an office environment with a chair, desk and the typical casting couch is such a bad idea because the room is small, the performer is never really made comfortable and this nis especially true during the sex because she will either be on her back on the hard desk(no padding of any kind), bent forward over the desk or having sex on the sofa which happens to be a few feet in front of the sofa whcih means that you can't really use the tripoid appropriately during what should be the most comfortable part of the video for the girl.
**It's hard to recommend this mess to anyone but anyone who wants to see amateurs have sex and don't really mind if the sex is badly shot, not very intense, where the male is not a good sex performer and where each video looks like the previous one might get something out of it. Everyone else should stay far away.** |
|
03-16-12 06:11am
Replies (11)
|
Review
10
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very few to think of. One good thing is that the women are pretty hot. That's about it. |
| Cons: |
I don't want to re-hash what others have said. The real con, I think, is that this guy is the biggest, most pathetic two-pump chump in porn. You'd think that after having sex with hundreds of women on camera, he'd be able to last more than 30 seconds inside a girl without going off, but nope. The most recent video, he does a girl anally, spends about 17 seconds inside her butt, then gets ready to pull out. She really likes anal and basically has to beg him to stay in. This guy is really, really pathetic. This basically means that the actual sex part of the scenes are extremely short. Its like 90% stupid interview, 5% sex, and 5% him trying to keep from ejaculating. He also shrieked like a little girl when a girl squirted on him. Ridiculous. Get another stunt cock because you are really, really pathetic. Oh yeah, and as the other posters have mentioned - he needs to shut the fuck up. No one wants his inane voice in the background when they're trying to rub one out. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bad site with talent who can't last more than 30 seconds without ejaculating. Not worth the money. |
|
10-28-12 06:13am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
11
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
|
10-21-21 06:30am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
12
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
|
08-06-15 03:55am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
13
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
|
01-24-15 06:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
14
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
|
06-02-14 04:47pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
15
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
|
12-26-13 07:27pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
16
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
|
10-15-11 11:43am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
17
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
|
08-09-10 10:22pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
18
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
|
07-26-10 02:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
19
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
|
10-09-09 12:13am
Replies (0)
|
|
