Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MrBison:
(Yanks's Reply)
Thanks for reading, I guess I'm pleasantly surprised about the snail mail thing!
|
07-09-19 07:27am
|
Reply
2
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(Yanks's Reply)
My apology on the part about having no way to remove the interviews. I'll be sure to use that feature from now on.
Truthfully, I used to really like interview videos, but as I mentioned, ALS sites, a few of the ATK sites too, they were good. I think I just got burnt out on them similar to how I'm not getting much out of girl/girl content these days even though it used to be my favorite genre.
I'm going to add a couple points for the filter option.
|
04-11-17 12:04am
|
Reply
3
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from RagingBuddhist:
(Yanks's Reply)
I never said that updates that include bios, interviews, photos, nose pickings, book readings or whatever else you put up aren't considered content. And, well, yeah, you have ignored my point and that is that there used to be more orgasms per week than there are now. 144/52= 2.769 which is, obviously, under three a week. It wasn't always like that. Lastly, had I really gone looking to support what I'm saying, I wouldn't have included that last group. I would have found another set with seven or eight. All I did was jump to a page, find a masturbation video and count back two weeks.
But you're definitely right about one thing - agree to disagree.
Done.
|
03-29-17 12:26pm
|
Reply
4
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(Yanks's Reply)
The point you seem to want to ignore is that, in the past, there were consistently more masturbation video updates every week than are currently being posted. Your longevity in the business doesn't change that fact. By your logic, if you started including video of the models painting their toenails as an update and those videos had a fan base, I should just accept that nothing has changed.
|
03-28-17 06:34pm
|
Reply
5
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(Yanks's Reply)
I'm not as active on PU like I was in the past, but some of the old timers here will tell you that I've always called things as I see them. If you want to think I'm rude, that's fine with me. I didn't care for your response too much myself, but that's also fine. You aren't the first webmaster I've tangled with and you probably won't be the last.
Due to the new layout of your site, I can no longer get back to the daily updates from years ago. I can only see the videos from "way back when". I have over 1700 video files going back to my first signup and there were definitely more of your own masturbation videos per week back then. That is no longer the case and hasn't been for some time now. So don't tell me my review (which is actually just a comment - no rating) is wrong. I never said I wanted an orgasm factory and my comment is a direct reflection of what I see now compared to the past. Here are random 2 week blocks from a few years back. All Yanks masturbation videos:
2013-11-19... 2013-04-23... 2012-04-27
2013-11-17... 2013-04-22... 2012-04-26
2013-11-17... 2013-04-21... 2012-04-21
2013-11-15... 2013-04-19... 2012-04-20
2013-11-13... 2013-04-17... 2012-04-15
2013-11-11... 2013-04-16
2013-11-10... 2013-04-13
2013-11-09...
That's considerably more than two or three a week, so yeah, "the pitch" has changed.
|
03-28-17 11:59am
|
Reply
6
|
Yanks VR
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from skippy:
(Yanks's Reply)
Hi,
Thanks for the response. It means a lot when a representative from the site responds.
From what I can see, your VR videos are well done. It looks like your intended audience is lesbian (as opposed to a girl-only "view" site like In-The-Crack), correct? I think it would probably clear things up a lot if you just come out and say that. Nothing wrong with that at all. Call it Sapphic VR. You will still get a lot of men and it will be clear that it is girls only sex. (Of course, I'm a guy and I'm pretty dense so it wasn't obvious to me when I made my first comment.)
When it comes to straight sex, I truly believe that using VR to shoot strictly observational scenes is not the most effective use of the medium. You shouldn't shoot a VR of a roller coaster from the ground, you don't create a VR game in the third person, you shouldn't shoot a VR car demo from the street watching the car go by and you shouldn't shoot straight porn VR sex from a chair next to the bed.
That said, I understand that it is incredibly difficult to do sapphic sex in participatory VR because there is no common position or orientation to shoot from. There are a few non-VR POV sites that do it pretty well, but I'm sure there is less gear involved and the actors are often pros. In your case, it would probably interfere with the genuine lovemaking that you are striving for. Your girls are not pros so working around and staying close to a fixed rig would certainly have an adverse impact on your videos. I can appreciate all of that.
As for the price, yes, 30 videos is just about average or maybe just shy of average. If you look at my review history here, you will see that I've joined nearly every VR porn site out there and am constantly joining more. The price for your site is 30-50% higher than any other VR site out there, even the ones that are approaching or exceeding 100 videos and are part of a large mixed network. But I understand. You've got a budget. You've got expenses. You have to determine how to stay solvent, what the market will bear and what your unique niche will support.
Rather than reducing your price universally, may I suggest reaching out to the folks at The Best Porn and working out a discount deal? It will almost certainly get you positive reviews and will help make your site a bigger blip on the VR map while limiting the discount to the most savvy viewers. Please consider that.
I applaud your efforts and truly hope you succeed.
|
02-07-17 08:53am
|
Reply
7
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(Yanks's Reply)
What I had signed up to your site for in the past has definitely changed - in my mind, for the worse. Your schedule for posting your own masturbation videos was considerably better years ago, before you added the GOW and ATK material.
3/28 ATK hardcore video
3/29 Yanks masturbation video
3/29 Yanks photo set
3/30 Yanks non-nude interview
3/31 ATK masturbation video
4/01 Biography
4/01 Yanks photo set
4/02 Yanks shaving her legs video
4/04 ATK photo set
4/05 Girls Out West photo set
4/04 Yanks non-nude interview
4/04 Biography
4/05 Yanks masturbation video
4/06 Yanks photo set
4/07 ATK photo set
4/07 Yanks semi-nude interview
4/07 Yanks non-nude interview
4/08 Yanks non-nude interview
Two Yanks masturbation videos in two weeks? Really?
|
04-07-16 10:05pm
|
Reply
8
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from soloporn:
(Yanks's Reply)
Thanks for the warm and fuzzy comments. It is possible to stream without flash, so I have amended that. I look forward to experiencing the new members area - I am sure it will match the quality of the continuing excellent content.
Kudos on putting in the extra effort, definitely respectable and feeling the appreciation.
Cheers.
|
01-29-16 09:26am
|
Reply
9
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(Yanks's Reply)
That's super.
Of course, you're responding to a post I made over a year and a half ago ... but still, glad any confusion is cleared up now.
|
08-23-10 06:20pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
