| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
In real life they'd probably get all soggy and nasty. In porn I just don't get it.
|
08-27-10 12:07am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
elephant (0)
|
It depends really, if she's cute and does it, it doesn't put me off her. it can look good and hot. just all depends on the girl doing it really. Its harmless I guess.
|
08-27-10 02:10am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
BadMrFrosty (0)
|
Dont mind it but its not really a turn on
|
08-27-10 02:42am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
Is it too much to ask for some good old-fashioned sex, with maybe a little tenderness or emotion or eroticism in there?
People can get bored with sex, so how about some fetishism.
But I would prefer some sex that is less kinky, less gonzo.
|
08-27-10 02:51am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
nadiencendia (0)
|
I really don't get the point, I mean, it's not disgusting or horrifying, but does anyone really get turned on by that? Yes, I suppose somebody does. But I just don't get it.
|
08-27-10 05:01am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
bjajlt362 (0)
|
It confuses the hell out of me. Who is looking at panties and going "you know what, those would look awesome inside her" very confusing indeed.
|
08-27-10 05:34am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Denner (0)
|
Voted: Never heard of it - in my MANY years as a porn N3rd - but then goggled it.
Oh, that's what it about! Did not know the phrase - and honestly: not a big deal, is it? It's not a specialty - it's used a lot at rather 'straight' sites during a models posing/masturbation ect.
Maybe if they start eating the things with taco sauce and alike, it would be more special, so yes, again: no big deal.
Honestly folks - let's get some better polls.
|
08-27-10 06:24am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
tangub (0)
|
Not bothered either way but wouldn't go out of my way to search for it.
|
08-27-10 06:26am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #7 - Denner :
Denner Said: "Honestly folks - let's get some better polls."
Well, you're welcome to suggest poll questions at:
https://www.pornusers.com/polls_suggest.html
|
08-27-10 07:01am
Reply To Message
|
10
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #9 - Khan :
I know, Khan, I know.....they will come from this user - no guaranties about quality, though, LOL
|
08-27-10 07:17am
Reply To Message
|
11
|
Capn (0)
|
Yuk!
I think that covers it for me. :0/
Cap'n. :0(
|
08-27-10 01:24pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
turboshaft (0)
|
I have no problem with it--always seems like a good way to keep a girl from losing her underwear! And considering all the things that can and do get stuffed...panties sound downright normal. ; - )
Helpful tip for those interested: I have heard that 100% cotton panties are more comfortable for stuffing in the pussy, synthetic blends are said to be irritating.
|
08-27-10 01:41pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
slutty (0)
|
? I must not browse enough porn, as I can only think of having seen this a couple of times. Are there sites dedicated to this activity, how long do they keep them up there? Do they tie a string to 'em tampon-style so they don't get stuck?
|
08-27-10 03:27pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I think it's OK here to talk about panty stuffing. After all, we do see in porn sometimes.
Well, have a nice talk ...
|
08-27-10 06:07pm
Reply To Message
|
15
|
pat362 (0)
|
I don't look for it but it's also not a turn off. I have seen some scenes where it was well done and it added something extra to the scene.
|
08-27-10 07:15pm
Reply To Message
|
16
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
It's one of those things that I can see why it would occur to a single woman in a single instance to do on the spur of the moment, just cause, well, you've got panties, you've got a pussy, why not put one inside the other - but I don't get why it's a fetish.
Of course, I also don't understand why feet are such a turn-on for some guys, so...
|
08-28-10 11:05am
Reply To Message
|
17
|
Monahan (0)
|
I absolutely love it. Seriously.
It started back in the early sixties (yup I was around back then) when "The Block" in Baltimore was in its glory.
The "home of traveling burlesque" was the good old Gaiety Theatre where they had 5 hours of stripping every afternoon.
The one rule (law?) that seemed to be in play was that the girls were prohibited from being totally naked and had to always wear their panties.
Usually the girls got around that rule by tying their panties around their ankles; but one creative and gorgeous babe stuffed her panties up her snatch instead and, with a little bit hanging out next to her gorgeously long labia lips, it was a total turn on for me.
It's probably that experience that, continuing today, I get a real "rise" out of panty stuffing.
|
08-28-10 11:07am
Reply To Message
|
18
|
turboshaft (0)
|
REPLY TO #17 - Monahan :
That's a great interpretation of the law--I'm sure many lawyers would be proud! : - )
|
08-28-10 11:42am
Reply To Message
|
19
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #17 - Monahan :
Monahan, you were born around 1952. So you were around 10 years old in the early 1960s. So what happened: instead of hiring a baby sitter, your parents dropped you off at a burlesque theater with strippers? No wonder you grew up addicted to porn? Lol.
|
08-28-10 05:32pm
Reply To Message
|
20
|
Monahan (0)
|
REPLY TO #19 - lk2fireone :
I wish. Nope. I was born in 1941 in the northeast and went to college in the south from 1960-64. Took the train from Penn Station and took advantage of the stopover opportunities at Baltimore both ways.
|
08-28-10 05:44pm
Reply To Message
|
21
|
dracken (0)
|
Wow, I spent years watching all sorts of strange porn and never heard of this one. Now I want to see a video...it's off to the good old search engines for me :)
Although a stripper that does it live would be much more interesting...
|
08-30-10 09:15pm
Reply To Message
|
22
|
slategrey (0)
|
If its what i think it is nope dont care for it.
|
09-26-11 05:31am
Reply To Message
|
