| User Reviews (23) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
PU/TBP discount
Nearly 20 years worth of updates online.
Site still updating with a new photo set nearly every day and a new video at least weekly.
Nearly 2000 models with over 10,000 photo sets and over 1000 videos.
Photo sets with downloadable zips in 4 sizes 800px, 1200px, 2500px & 5500px.
Latest videos come with 4 download options 1920, 1040, 720 & 480.
No download limits encountered and no issues using download manager.
Cancellation was easy enough with immediate email confirmation. |
| Cons: |
Watch out for the pre-checked cross sales, you could end up with $80 of charges for unwanted subscriptions if you miss it.
Biggest con for me was the incomplete and shambolic model index, will explain more in bottom line.
I found the videos boring but maybe that's just me, I'm only really interested in the photos.
There's no real description or preview of the videos so you don't really have much idea of the content before you watch or download it.
No file sizes listed for videos or photo zips.
You could probably count the number of Black or Asian models on one hand.
Minimal model info. |
| Bottom Line: |
I signed up for Femjoy early December after spotting a Cyber Monday deal on PU/TBP at $5 for the first month, an offer I found too good to refuse. I did have reservations about signing up though as I really don't like the Trust Charge billing company they use and the way they add 20% to the join price allegedly for VAT, not to mention the pre-checked cross sales. Happy to report that no problem with unauthorised charges though and cancellation was relatively straightforward. With the threat of a recurring billing of $36 I was only ever going to stay for 1 month.
The earliest updates on Femjoy date from June 2004 so you have almost 20 years of updates to see here. It's a nude art photography based site similar to MetArt with photo sets outnumbering videos by ten to one. There's almost 2000 models and they are almost all attractive to drop dead gorgeous. The content is nearly all solo with the odd two or three girl sets here and there. You get some brief biographical info of the models such as hair and eye colour, height, weight and breast size. They don't however say where they are from, I'm guessing mostly white Eastern Europeans. There's also something weird going on with the given ages of the models. You can look at a model who might look in her 20s then look at her bio and her age is given as 42. I'm guessing they put the model's age when she first appears on the site then it rises year by year to give her current day age.
The site is easy enough to find your way around, the main headings being home, models, photos and videos. My preferred way to browse a site is via the model index working my way through from A to Z. It was only after going through the models beginning with M it suddenly occurred to me that I hadn't seen Matty, a model I had noticed on the home page due to a recent update, so I checked again and she definitely did not appear in the model index. I then started looking through the photos pages and by the time I had reached page 50 dating back to 2018 I had come across more than 300 more models that do not appear in the model index. This seems to be a major oversight on the part of the site owners not ensuring that models who have debuted on the site in the last few years are added to the model index. You can also sort the model index, photos and videos by most recent and rating although I think sorting by rating is pretty useless as every photo set and video is rated 5/5 and every model apart from 2 on the last page are rated 5/5. There are also several dozen models in the model index who have zero photo sets or videos, I'm assuming these are models who retired and asked to have their content removed. Surely you should also remove them from the model index?
The photo sets are the main strength of Femjoy, they clearly use some of the best photographers in the business. I particularly enjoyed the many photo sets shot in stunning outdoors settings. Thankfully they now produce the photo sets in a decent mid size 2500px option which they haven't always done until recent years and the main reason I had never joined until now. The file sizes of the 2500px zips are mostly nice and compact coming in at between 30 to 100MB although for some reason the updates in the last few months are more like 300 MB. The zip file names include model name, photographer name and set name. Unfortunately they don't include the date so the photo sets won't sit in chronological order in your folder as they do at MetArt. There was no index of photographers that I could find although if you are viewing a photo set you can click on the photographers name and you'll be taken to a page with all their other sets.
I'm not that interested in videos and tend to find them boring on these types of sites. The first one I watched was of a beautiful Asian babe with an infectious smile named Kloyali. She's walking around on a beach in a bikini, removes the bikini and then rolling around naked on the sand and in the sea, you barely get a glimpse of pussy. It's very tame. Not all videos are like that though, I watched one of Caprice masturbating and then one of Anna N called Maid for Pleasure where she's dressed as a French Maid and masturbating with a dildo so there is some more explicit stuff but I'm not sure how much of that you will find. I guess it depends on the model and what she feels comfortable doing.
In conclusion an an excellent site with beautiful models and amazing photography, highly recommended if you have the time and patience to go through it and find all the models that are missing from the model index, thankfully 10 days off work for Christmas meant I had the time. I was tempted to knock points off for the shambolic organisation of the model index but in the end just based my score on the quality of the content. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (5 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (6 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (8 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (45) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
