Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.

Visit Site We Are Hairy Type: Pay Site NICHES COMPANY COST 1. Hairy Women 2. All Fetishes WeAreHairy 1 Site Listed Partner: We Are Hairy Partners Monthly: $34.95 (recurring) Multi-Mo: $79.95 (3 months, recurring) Beware of Pre-Checked Cross-Sells! Be sure to uncheck additional offers (if undesired) to other sites when inputting your credit card info. Details: 1 pre-checked View all We Are Hairy Site Facts at TBP.

N/A Feedback History  (44) Active Reviews 0 Newbie Reviews 14 Active Ratings 0 Newbie Ratings 1 Comments 29 Review by TheBestPorn: 95.0 TBP Review Date: 08-15-23 Type: 2.0 Will +  Get Lost in Bush Country +   Explore this Big Hairy Collection User Reviews (12)  User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts. Shown : 1-10 of 12 Next Page > Newbie 97* HairyPotter (0) 08-08-23  07:38pm No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: Hairy fetishists have found paradise If you’re a hairy fetishist, this may be the only site you ever need Great quality videos and unlimited downloads The pictures are super nice and can be downloaded, too Less than 1,500 models, but over 10,000 scenes One of the best model indexes I have used The price reduction to $14.95 is awesome! Cons: I fancy myself a hairy fetishist, but even I have limits. There are many more hairy parts than pubic including legs and armpits It's possible there won’t be enough variety in the scenes for the fans who like variety Bottom Line: Even though my screenname tells I’m a Hairy fan, it’s just not as extreme as a lot of hairy fetishists. My main fetish with hairy pubes is seeing them in panties. I like seeing a few stragglers peeking out from under the panties. I like seeing through panties to see a full, dark bush. Hairy arms, hairy legs, hairy armpits are just not for me, but those are on the site and I know there is a market for that type of hairy content. For my money, this site is the end all of Hairy sites. I have often believed I complicated my own porn interests. My interest can and has started and stopped at just seeing a bush under panties. That is the biggest reason I love this site. The first and second, maybe third focuses are on the hairy parts. I do accept and understand that may not be enough for others and that is the downside of We Are Hairy. The content really pushes and focuses on the Hairy aspect. You’re not going to see a lot of hardcore or extreme or deeply kinky scenes or photos. It is more about the beauty and showing off of the Hairy parts. As my pros told, there has been a price reduction that sees the site only costing $14.95 a month. I was used to paying $35 a month for it. The videos may not be as exciting or hardcore as you’re used to, but those videos do a stellar job of showcasing the hairy models. The picture sets are arguably better than the videos. If you’re a Hairy fetishist, you understand that and appreciate it. To make their picture sets even better, you can download a custom zip file you choose the pictures for. The videos do not have a 4K option, but those are still very clear. The pictures are large quality resolution. I can see not recommending this site despite my high score. This is not for everyone, but I think everyone who tries it will be very impressed and happy with their content. The model index is the best I have used and the site itself runs and loads quickly and smoothly. There are tags and you should never have trouble finding what you’re looking for. If I was going to recommend any changes it would be to have more lesbian scenes, but not hardcore (man and woman) scenes. This is a genre that is softcore by nature and it needs to stay that way. The site is as near to perfect as I have been on. It reminds me that technical quality does not outweigh the biasedness towards a favorite fetish. You also know what you’re getting with the site. That does have the downside of possibly being repetitive, but if you love the fetish, repetitiveness is welcomed. It's well worth joining for fetishists and maybe non-fetishists could take a look at some of the preview content. There’s almost nothing wrong with this site and I could see it being appreciated by nearly all porn fans. Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply Expired 88* KayTBuffs (0) 10-19-21  01:04pm    TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies) Expired 90* rearadmiral (0) 01-22-21  07:05am                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies) Expired 98* mbaya (Disabled) 10-20-18  08:48am                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies) Expired 94* Loki (0) 09-15-18  01:12am          TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies) Expired 83* otoh (0) 09-03-13  10:00am              TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies) Expired 69* critic (0) 03-10-13  05:31am No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (8 Replies) - Webmaster Replied! Expired 70* monty4321 (0) 02-06-12  07:17pm TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (5 Replies) Expired 95* BubbaGump (0) 02-05-12  12:42pm          TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (6 Replies) - Webmaster Replied! Expired 99* messmer (Disabled) 12-05-10  04:11pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (8 Replies) *Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews. Shown : 1-10 of 12 Next Page > User Comments (29)  Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc. Shown : 11-20 of 29 < Previous Page - Next Page > xexbot (0) 01-30-12  10:44am    TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Not sure why it's scored so high I really don't get how this We Are Hairy outscores ATK Hairy. In terms of layout they are about equal navigation/search-wise. Both have massive content, and some of it dates back at least a few years so they both have issues of not everything being HD. Really, when you get right down to it, it all comes down to content. And that's why I don't see why We Are Hairy is scoring higher than ATK. WAH has some decent models, but even their best is almost average for ATK. My primary complaint about WAH is that it is almost 99% softcore, solo modeling. No action to really speak of. Even the masturbation videos they have are, well, boring. As far as a hirsute fetish site goes, WAH is okay, they are certainly worth a look if you just want solo models doing little else than posing. However, if you want a littel range in your hairy porn, then I would certainly look at ATK Hairy because they actually have everything from "X" to "XXX." Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply RagingBuddhist (Disabled) 01-01-12  10:10pm              TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Update to my review Obviously, it's been a while since my review, so here are a few updates. On the plus side: The number of models has increased nicely (250+), along with it, the addition of different age and body type models. There are also a few ethnics now appearing on the site. Picture viewing preference can now be set globally. Custom zip files for pictures in 3 resolutions. On the negative side: I have to agree with a lot of the comments that have been left on here and on the site - weird camera angles, focus and lighting issues are far too common in a lot of the picture sets. Two recurring themes that bother me personally are the models pulling on their pubic hair throughout the set and similarly having to touch themselves or keep their hands near their crotch. With the video, I've seen a considerable amount of scenes where the camera is constantly moving, almost in (for lack of a better phrase) an amateur-with-their-first-camera fashion. I'm still an amateur fan and definitely old school - I like my women natural and I still like the site. Fortunately, Basil is one of the most attentive webmasters I've encountered and I have no doubt that anything that can be done to appeal to more people will be taken care of. Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied! monty4321 (0) 12-12-11  03:46pm TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Quality? Natural lighting? Does this website do a lot of photo editing that causes the models to have unnatural colors or causes the pics to look unnatural. How are the poses? Are there a bunch of useless poses without having that good shot you're waiting for or missing some of those basic poses. They should at least have these basic poses: 1)(full body nude shot with good clarity/detail) standing or lying down 2)(boob shot) from the waist up to include the cute face of the model 3) (vagina shot) model laying down on back with legs spread, but also with her face in view without being out-of-focus. Kind of like a missionary pose. Are they there? Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply messmer (Disabled) 11-25-11  06:06pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Going from glory to glory! A quick tour revealed that WAH has been doing four updates a day since August! Very impressive. It does my heart good to see that this site is prospering and ever improving (despite my rather "frightened" comment a while ago.) I really was scared that "scary" hairy would take over, but don't see much of a sign of that happening. Thanks, Basil, for sticking with a good formula. Now, please give me more models in lingerie! :-) Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply messmer (Disabled) 08-21-11  07:35pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Something I swore I would never do ... ... because I like the webmaster and his enthusiasm too much but I would ask all those who read my review to take off at least 10 points if they are not into a "hair" fetish. Nine updates this month alone feature models with hairy legs! Mind you, this still leaves 51 fairly straight updates, but the site is starting to look way too earthy for me to feel comfortable seeing it listed at a whopping 99 under my name. Therefore to all ye who may be tempted to subscribe: if you are into body hair in general, including anal, pits, arms, legs, this site will still rate very highly with you given all its good points. The quality, the lay-out, the search engine, the updates, the friendly and helpful webmaster are all still there. If, on the other hand, you like clean looking girls who have remained traditional by keeping their pubic hair but who shave their legs (as everyone except for hippies and women in rural Transylvania did for as long as I can remember,) then an 89 would be a more realistic rating for you these days. This is still a pretty good score for a pretty good site, I think! And with a bit of sifting you'll still get a lot of good stuff. I just don't like to see my 99 connected with hairy legs! Ever! :-) Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied! messmer (Disabled) 07-06-11  02:16pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Goodbye Hairy Sites! You've been taken over by a different breed. I sincerely wish you luck, after all lovers of hairy legs, pits, bellies, cracks, have to have a site too but there has never been a time in my lengthy life time where I have met anyone who was turned on by extreme hairiness .. except now and that's why the reference to a different breed. The site owner of ATK Natural and Hairy tried to tell me that people having my taste were still being catered to and he/she "proved" it by stating that only 38% of recent updates catered to the extreme crowd. ONLY 38%?? This love of hair everywhere on the body is something brand new to me and does not fit my ideal of feminine beauty. So, off to "shaved!" I hope lovers of "extreme" hair see this comment as well because it can't hurt to get new subscribers who like the niche, and I am certainly not out to undermine an otherwise fine site or to dispute their users' taste ..! "We Are Hairy" are certainly not as prejudiced in favor of extreme hair as is ATK N&H at the moment but judging by their recent updates they are getting there. Thank Heavens I got used to the shaved look in the meantime, otherwise I'd really be stuck for anything to subscribe to. I am sincerely sad about the recent developments but also sincerely glad that room has been made for the fetishists in the hairy category to look at and enjoy what they like best. Still wishing the best to this site and its webmaster, I remain, m. Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply mr smut (0) 06-19-11  04:14am              TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) My first impressions are great! After having seen that the honourable Messmer gave this site a 99 I couldn't resist and had to join it immediately. Now there's a lot of new content waiting for me to explore some of it is already downloaded and I was able to watch some of the movies they offer. This is a dream for those not afraid of hairy pussy. I did find some models also appearing on AllOver30.com and I'm quite happy with the mixture of mature and younger hairy ladies/girls. Guess I'll have to write a review soon. The best model so far is 41 year old Carmen who knows exactly how to tease :-). Cheers, Smut Respond: 16 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied! Capn (0) 02-20-11  02:48pm              TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Shift of Emphasis? I just took a look back here. To go by the recent updates, toys & gyno-style shots feature pretty large now. Over half of the recent updates show it in the preview. It really doesn't float my boat, but it might appeal to some, so I thought it was worth mentioning. Cap'n. :0/ Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied! messmer (Disabled) 11-27-10  12:49pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Getting lazy in my old age! I was just going to upgrade my review to 99 but discovered I could no longer edit it so I'm taking the lazy man's way out by saying I promised this site a 99 once its content increased and it has. I don't think I'll have reason to rue the decision to give a site my highest mark ever because: Content has increased considerably! There are now three updates a day (2 Picture sets, 1 Video)! Quality and erotic value of the picture sets and videos are far superior to that of its present competitors! Webmaster is still as attentive and personally involved as he was at the beginning! May this site escape the ravages of the present economic downturn, it deserves nothing but success! You may have noticed I didn't mention lingerie. I am saving my 100 for the site that features the most sets featuring erotic undies percentage wise. Haven't checked out all the updates of this site yet so, who knows, I might do the unthinkable yet and give a site the perfect score! :-) Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply greg909 (0) 11-22-10  06:32pm No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Room for Improvement I like this site and really want to see it succeed, especially with so few quality hairy sites out there. But more and more, it's starting to feel just like ATK Hairy. Most of the models are the same ones that appeared on ATK a month or so before, and there isn't much turn-around. The same old faces keep reappearing. Also, although the image size is bigger than ATK, the fine detail in pictures just doesn't come anywhere close to what you'd see on Met-art or a few other high-quality sites. This might be down to poor photography, but at 3000 pixels, you should be counting pores on the skin, yet many sets on WAH just look soft in close-up. The poses are also getting to be quite boring. Every set is much the same, with corny lingerie up to the last page. As I said, I want this site to succeed and be good, but it's getting too repetitive and the image quality isn't among the top sites. I'll see how it looks in the future. Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied! Shown : 11-20 of 29 < Previous Page - Next Page > Visit We Are Hairy Company Sites Top sites from this company.       Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP 1. We Are Hairy (0) N/A 95.0 View All: Company Sites (1) Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.08 seconds.