Got an email for Teen Dreams. $9.95 for first month.
This is mainly a photo site.
But also has videos.
Many years since I was a member.
But I'm tempted.
This was a great site years ago,
A lot of really cute teen models.
Apart from the mysterious billingco. and the strange cross-sales ect. (noted by Capn in May this year) - the once great, great Teendreams seems to have gone down in other ways:
New webmaster (it seems) - some here remember the fine communication over the years with the good webmaster at the site.
The preview is now hopeless/useless - no way to see updates or anything like in the past. Now they show some thumbnails of a few vids - and the same scenes are repeated with a little different thumb.
Should I say: Teendreams - R.I.P.
TBP states "Readers of The Best Porn can join Teen Dreams at a special discount price of $20 a month, a nice savings off the regular price of $30 a month."
When you join the price is $29.95, not $20. This is an apparent ongoing issue that hasn't been resolved for a long time.
I can't seem to get the TBP price even if I enter the final payment section. The payment is powered by Pure Web Power, but I don't know if that matters. I really wanted to rejoin since I was here a couple years ago. Does anyone know if TBP link is not entered correct?
I was prepared to compromise my stand a little & make a subscription to this site, despite its support of CCBills regional pricing scam, given the dearth of on topic material available to me.
I am perhaps being a little hasty, but it is over 24 hours now & I have had no reply from this site's support about an alternative non-regional pricing Epoch billing option.
Looks like I shall be giving this a miss again then.
I thought it was only appropriate to commend these folks for their very open tour.
Whilst some may think their members pages look a little dated, they are actually quite intuitive in use, and through a few clicks you can see all the content of a selected model, albeit mostly in thumbnail form.
Some sites throw a lot of functionality out of the window when they revamp a site.
The layout here shows that a fair amount of thought has gone in.
If & when you do update, please keep the open informative non-member area.
Oh & I do like the way they stretch the 'teen' element.
It is very nice to see a young lady mature over a few years & sessions. ;0)
Somehow I have completely missed the model, Zulfija. Happened to see her on Met-Art and decided to see if I could find any other content of her. I found some on Domai and Domai's sister site Goddess Nudes, then found a thread on a forum that said she was on Teen Dreams. I go to Teen Dreams and see her in the featured models section, click it and it says, "We have 4 exclusive series of Zulfija inside our members area!"
Since I knew they had a preview members area I clicked it just to make sure it's not sets I already have. When I go to her model page, she has ONE set. This becomes further confusing when she happens to be the feature model on the main page. It says they have five sets, 500 photos, 2250px of her. Right now, in my porn rut, she's a deal breaker. What I'm wondering, since Teen Dreams is known for the use of quite a few aliases for models, is she maybe listed under a different name? I've never known Teen Dreams to be a dishonest site, so I want to believe it's explainable, but as said above, it's a deal breaker. Does anyone know how much content there is of Zulfija on Teen Dreams?
Not a major issue really, but worth noting. I've found there are a couple of scenes that are not available on the VivThomasVideos bonus site. Website staff said it's probably because they want to keep some content 100% to themselves.
Honestly, amigos - at TBP: This site and the bonus-sites with it has not updated for a VERY long time - years! Sweet Denisa is a 'sub' of Teendreams along with the Ira- and Vicky-sites ect. that's stated as bonus dittos - and all of the content here is part of old Teendreams material - great as it is - it's still OLD material - without updates at all!
So a new review?
So what's the actual dimensions of the photos here? And how far back in time do the "ultra HD resolution" photos go? Are they riddled with excessive false sharpening, which I seem to remember from a couple years ago.
Just wondering if it's worth a revisit, although I don't care about the videos.
The webmaster got in touch with me about a problem they were having during a revision of the site (see replies). I thought that they had decided to discontinue previews of the gallery thumbs for visitors -- a great feature that I wish more sites had. Turns out that hasn't changed. Hurray!
Yes, I know I am out of fashion for liking photosets. ;0/
This site is a recent discovery for me, & I was very pleased by the quantity of models & the overall decent quality of the photography.
The model selection streches the Teen label somewhat, with models making return visits years after their initial sets.
I like the fact that they do though. They vary from striking to average to stunning.
Navigation I find intuitive & layout good. There is also a user forum now, but it is not heavily used.
Zip sets are available, but I would advise renaming as they just have a sequential number.
I won't pass comment on the videos becuse I seldom, if ever, look at them.
I like it & will probably maintain membership for some time.
I joined this site in July, 2009. My interest is solely in BG (boy/girl) videos, not solos and not still photos. See my profile for my tastes. Anyway, I found NOTHING the least bit erotic here. The BG videos were mechanical, and the actors looked bored. The girls never had orgasms. There was no intimacy, and no creativity. Although the same was true of most videos at YoungModels and at KarupsHA, I found enough great gems at each of those (see them listed in my reviews) that my subscriptions were worthwhile. I did not save any of the videos that I downloaded from TeenDreams, and I feel that my money was wasted there.
Sometimes a sudden impulse can be ok.
In this case with Teendreams - I check out this site regularly and have done that over the years. Once it was a favorite, then it went downhill - especially concerning videos of newer models.
Thanks to a relativly good preview, you can get an ok info about updates - AND it's much better now.
Just joined again - and do not regret - danm fine solo-videos of some known og some not so well known teenmodels..
Hope this is a new trend at Teendreams - but, still looking for videos of others fine teens - who are only in photosets.
And BTW: They still got currency problems when joining outside USA - but then again: write them, and they'll give you a link to EPOCH where the price is still $ 19.95 in Europe....
AND: I miss modelnames in start of movies (like in the old days - it's fine/helpfull when making archives)
I asked a friend, who has a subscription, about this site and he told me the content is hazzy at best.
Girls that sometimes are described as hardcore only have softcore shots and the videos lack in quality as well as quantity.
I am uncertain what to do (get a subscription or not) I remember he showed me a set where you were promised sex between a teen and an old guy but the whole set was just the guy dancing around her and kissing her...rather disappointing...is the whole site like that? Can you find some nice hardcore on here?
Teendreams has updated the preview - where they have put in a small logo to state photo or video - great!
But for months I've been browsing the site to look for all those new - and fine looking - models that has turned up with a number of photosets - BUT NO videos.
The only video-updates are seen elsewhere - or at least the models here are "old" well-known...
It just a pity.
pics, not exclusive - but with exclusive watermarks!
I've just noticed a photoset of Eva Angel published on 31st Aug 07, watermarked as exclusive to teendreams.com. The same photoset is on KarupsPC.com watermarked as licensed.
Another one :- Veronica Sanchez (Anett) published on 31st Aug 07. The same photoset was published 7th Sep 07 on Xisty.com.
Alexa (Alexis) published on 31st Aug 07. Also available on KarupsPC.com and Babelicious.com.
Barbara, published on 31st Aug 07. Also available on Babelicious.com
I understand theres are lots of licensed content floating around , but why watermark the images as EXCLUSIVE when they are not. Maybe I have interpreted the word EXCLUSIVE incorrectly, or maybe 31st August 2007 was a bad day at the teendreams office.
I think I need to go sit down in a dark room. Sorry for being such a drama queen, it just makes me a bit angry.
Gotta bring this up again, sorry...
But, Teendreams: your're going down the drain!
Whatever happend to all those exclusive (sometimes licensed) videos that you guys used to put on the site - and all those exiting onces, you promised to bring up start 2009 - of new models, new exclusive solo-videos ect.
Sorry, thing do NOT ad up - the picking is less than slim - instead of fine, new solo-videos, we get a lot of old crap: lez, mostly - and some b/g...
I'm running out of membership shortly, but it'll take a lot of time before I return - sadly.
Will keep looking at your preview - and hope.
One of my all time favorites made me a promiss (how about that)!
Well, anyway Teendreams webmaster stated - both here and in a mail to this user - that the site would really go for it from January 2009 - especially with a new amount/style of videos - and a lot of new girls.
Well, I'm certainly not that exited:
3 new solo videos in this year - and we're now at the 7.th - less than one pr. day. And then some non-exclusive b/g videos.
Had my hopes up higher, but there's not much new on that solo-girl-video front - since I last joined, alas...
Still I keep up these hopes up for the nearest future - that's why I join - again and again.
BTW: A plus: the few new solo-videos are of new and great quality!
I've posted this on their message board but figured I'd also post here incase someone else has had this problem. If I try to save individual images using a download manager in FireFox, I get a 403 error. If I try to right click and save file as, it'll save it but when I try to open it I get a "Not a valid jpg image".
Anyone else have this problem? I know I can just download zips but frankly don't care to see pretty much the same image 5 times or have to go through 100+ images when all I really want is 20-25. Overall site is great but this could be a deal breaker for me.
RESOLVED: The problem is not with Firefox and the site but the problem is with DownThemAll and the site. It appears that some added security feature throws off the download manager, so it ends up thinking there is no file or that you down have authorization to download it. Overall not a big deal.
Back at Teendreams again....!
A new model (first set july 2008) by the name (at Teendreams as a couple of others): Ira - a sweet slim, small titted silver-haired girl (russian, according to TD) - NEVER seen her before.
Tried to locate her at Eurobabeindex (and elsewhere) - no luck.
Anybody resently/present at TD - got any idea who she is?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
