Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 297 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Hustler HD

1. Hustler HD (0)

Pay
Newbie
87*
Do Not Bite It (0) 03-11-25  07:48pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: One of the biggest names in adult entertainment over the last 50 years.
Video downloads in clear high definition
Back catalog of the digitized Hustler magazines
Downloadable photo sets
Multiple updates per week
Professional, clean and not cluttered website
Cons: Despite a clean design, the site and its included sites can become confusing and overwhelming
I would like to see more download options on the videos
Bottom Line: Like many Porn Users, I remember the days of buying a Hustler magazine from a corner store. It does not seem like bookstores carried Hustler back then, but I could be wrong. I only remember Penthouse and Playboy in bookstores. Hustler was a premium adult magazine to most of us.

That is one of the most interesting parts of a membership to Hustler HD. It comes with access to a couple decades of Hustler digitized magazines. One of the oldest jokes about men subscribing to adult magazines was, “I read the articles.” Hustler was maybe the best and truest to that saying. From hilarious cartoons to stories of all kinds of sexiness and jokes, often, extremely politically incorrect jokes. You get to experience all that with these digitized magazines.I thought maybe it would just be a bunch of nude pictures, but there are all the features, or if you prefer, articles.

Hustler HD seems to be the future for Hustler. They include access to all the content from Hustler Mega Pass. I do not know why they would rebrand, but you get access to a lot of content. Which is one of the cons. The content becomes harder to find the further you go into the site or network. You are better off finding actresses you like or a series of DVDs and just searching through those, otherwise, you end up in areas of the site where some links are dead and pictures do not even load. It feels like this site is the future, but they are trying to either get rid of older content or somehow integrate it.

I have seen 3-4 updates per week and there are over 3,000 videos in the video section. There are also over 2,000 photo sets. You can download as many videos and photo sets as you want and the quality is high definition, 720/1080. The videos range from solo, lesbian, hardcore and group.

I was not even aware of this site until an email promo caught my attention. I do not see a huge difference between this site and the other Hustler sites. That is not really a bad thing, but it does make me wonder why they would replace an otherwise good site with another just good site.

The navigation is good. I am impressed with the site design and maybe that is my answer for why there is this newer Hustler site. I would confidently compare the sex quality in the scenes to Viv Thomas scenes. It is more like the porn from the late 90s and early 2000s than the hardcore gonzo we see in most newer porn sites. It is a definite positive step in the right direction, but it’s more of a pensive baby step than a giant step forward.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Upskirt Jerk

2. Upskirt Jerk (0)

Pay
Newbie
95*
2Cigars1Woman (0) 10-08-24  11:12pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: I just want to thank the jerk that took these pictures and videos
Upskirts, somehow, some way, are an underrated niche in porn
The production of these scenes is extraordinary, especially the clothing choices
Extremely high quality video and picture downloads
Beautiful British models with their sexy accents
Lots of niches are tapped into especially ones involving panties
Cons: Never seen this as a con, but I thnk it’s a good one to mention. Most porn we see these days is made in America. Upskirt Jerk is from the UK and there is an adjustment to make.
I can see some porn fans not appreciating the amount of tease and lack of action.
Bottom Line: Where oh where has this site been? I love upskirts and have for, I’m guessing, most of life. If you have ever said that or felt it, do yourself a favor and join this site. Just use that as a TL;DR.

Upskirt Jerk also brings the quality. There are plenty of 4K downloads and if not, you still can download in HD. Once I realized just how underrated and underrepresented upskirts are, I caught a glimpse of how big this site is. Upwards of 2,500 videos and a similar number of photosets. It had me rethinking my opinion of how underrated and underrepresented this classic niche was. After a few months of membership, I feel confident in calling it underrepresented.

Maybe, the con I used, could be a pro or con depending on the reader. I don’t know if there is a consensus feeling on this, but non-American sites do seem to have figured out how to do some things better. The outfits are such a huge factor for this niche. The scenes can be changed by simply having a model in a sexy skirt with panties “accidentally” slid over. I believe that is called a wardrobe malfunction or a perfect porn photo op.

While watching the videos from Upskirt Jerk, I did, at times, wonder what the scenes would be like with a man or even woman joining the model. After much thinking, I’ve come to the belief, nothing more is needed. The majority of these models likely make a living off shooting porn like Upskirt Jerk has. These women are so experienced in showing us their upskirts, you never know what they’re going to do to expose their panties.

This site could seem to be a little overrated, but it’s not. They nail the technical quality, the quality of models, the clothing and they live up to their title of Upskirt Jerk. While ti’s clear the scenes are planned out, the innocence and simple act of doing an upskirt, reminds us, a lot of young women like their bodies stared at and wanted.

The biggest connundrum you’re going to find yourself in is how to join the site. It is part of one of the best networks I have ever seen. You can join just Upskirt Jerk for $29.95 a month, or you can join their network for $49.95 a month. The network not only includes Upskirt Jerk, but also has the equally as teasing, Wank it Now and the outsdaning Bopping Babes, plus severlal others. I do believe the network is the better deal and better way to go, but I just had a membership to Bopping Babes a few months ago.

The next time I join it, I plan on joining the entire network. I will just make sure not to join any of their sites until I join the network.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mr. Man

3. Mr. Man (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
LadyLover (0) 09-28-24  06:22pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: This site is the converse of Mr. Skin – but instead of showing nude women, the site features nude men.
If an actror has appeared nude in a movie house movie or broadcast or cable TV, his nude scene is almost certainly going to be here
Video downloads are now offered in h.264 format (MP4)
HTTPS is used
Newer clips available in 720p for download (older may still be lower quality)
LOTS of content
14000+ Celeb Pages
12000+ Title Pages
110000+ Pics
37000+ Clips
540+ Playlists
1040 Original Videos
Cons: Most videos are not HD, and the ones that are top out at 720p
Most clips include only the parts with nudity, so you lose some of the context and build up in the scene. Adding a couple of minutes to get the complete scene would be nice.
Many of the thousands of scenes they show are extremely short - as in a couple of seconds. For some of the super-short ones, they’ll offer a super-slo-mo instant replay.
Nearly all the photos are screen caps
No biographical information
Bottom Line: Mr Skin has been around since 1999, Mr Man was spun off more recently (I’m not sure when but I’d guess at least 10 years ago).

As you can probably tell from my User Name, female nudity is more my thing. But I got a chance to get a one month membership for 5 bucks, and curiosity got the better of me, so I joined up.

When you first go to Mr. Man, to sign up, they do require a credit card to be presented. They claim they will not charge the account, it’s only to prove you are over 18, and in my case, to their credit, they did not charge me anything and no transaction appeared on my account.

If you sign up this way and also sign up to receive emails, you will soon get an offer to join the site for $5 for the first month, rebilling at $20 per month after that. I signed up for that deal. Cancelling after the first month was very easy. Note that they have cross-checked sites so clear those, they also provided a one-month free subscription to two additional sites. Cancelling those extra sites is easy too, but make note – you have to cancel each of the three sites individually.

A ”Playlist” is a collection of scenes that fit a theme, such as “Best Blowjobs of the 90s” (this one has 17 scenes) or “Hot Gay Threesomes” (this one has 19 scenes). Body of Work is a pretty regular series where they focus on a single actor.

Their “About Us” statement is a pretty good summary of what they offer

Mr. Skin- the world’s foremost authority on celebrity nudity- is pleased to present the newest destination for male celebs at their hottest, Mr. Man. Since 1999, Mr. Skin has been the greatest, most dynamic, most all-encompassing warehouse of celebrity nudity on the planet. Now we’re using our below the belt expertise to bring you all your favorite male celebrities nude and exposed.
With meticulously catalogued video clips and pictures of actors who have dared to bare, Mr. Man has no fakes and no scams, only the highest quality content that you can trust. Forget the days of wading through plot and dialogue just to get to the moment when your favorite actor gets nude, Mr. Man is “fast-forwarding to the good parts” so you don’t have to.
From Hollywood heartthrobs to the latest nudecomers, Mr. Man delivers one-of-a-kind celebrity entertainment experience with Mr. Skin’s signature brand of bawdy, boisterous comedy. If you’ve ever seen a gorgeous actor on-screen and wondered if they’ve done a nude scene, Mr. Man has the answer.
It's a dirty job, but someone's got to do it!”

Navigation is quite good, especially if you can recall the actor’s name (first or last) or the name of the movie. The browse function for celebs also offers a lot of choice (some sites might call this advanced search). For example, some of the filters include: has shown penis (2947 actors yes, 11,106 no), hair color, ethnicity, country, and keyword such as athlete, childhood star, singer/musician, etc.


Downloads are fast - helped by the small file sizes due to short scene length. But browsing and streaming are also pretty snappy.

Mr Skin has offered lifetime memberships off and on for years, I got mine a long time ago for $99. Mr Man also offers them occasionally, but the cheapest price I have seen the past couple of months was $139. If you subscribe to their emails, there will be sales where annual memberships go for $48, or one-month for $5. So if you are considering this site, do sign up for emails first.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pornstar Network

4. Pornstar Network (0)

Network
Newbie
50*
Wraith0711 (0) 08-30-24  08:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Best of the beautiful Canadian Girls
Photo sets
Cons: Site is an archive
Absolutely no site is updating
Site has been gutted with all but the solo girls site being removed
Only "new" videos are being added through moviez which of course is an extra charge to watch
Bottom Line: This site was once a powerhouse but sadly has aged horribly. At least 75% or more of the network has been removed, Thinking about it, I'm 100% positive that all Elegant Angel content has been removed which was the bulk of the network after they cut ties with Doghouse Digital. Now all that is left is just the solo girls sites and three other sites. There used to be like 50-60 sites here on the network, most likely more. All that's left is 14 sites. The girl sites are well worth joining if you've never seen them, Christine Young, Cherry Potter, Cute Angie, and so on. Most of it was shot in early to mid 2000's so it's extremely low definition. No updates at all and the stuff they are posting is content from moviez witch is extremely old recycled crap from the same era.

The exclusive content from Doghouse has sadly been lost to time. They never posted any of it to their own site. I was just devastated when I dropped my external drive and lost all the original content and rejoined to find all their stuff gone. (This was 2015ish BTW) A lot of the Lesbo 101 stuff was lost too when that site went belly up. Thankfully 90% of it is here on flirty pussy.

But the loss of the Elegant Angel stuff is a devastating loss to the site. This is when Cytheria and Tiana Lynn were the porn Queens of the era. That content (some of it Exclusive) is was top notch and just a horrible loss. Hopefully it's on one their sites.

Bottom line, If you have ever joined this site, move on. There is nothing new to see here, the sites here haven't updated in over 10+ years.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit SexMex.xxx

5. SexMex.xxx (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
pinkerton (0) 01-05-24  04:58am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Over 2000 scenes of latina hardcore sex with daily updates.
+Functional, responsive, easy to use site with good search of scene titles and models.
+Paged scenes listing and model listings can be sorted by date, rating and name/title - model listing can be filtered alphabetically.
+Scene listing shows most info about the scene with title, model, release date and scene description all there.
+Tags to select scenes by categories such as anal, DP, creampie and so on.
+Scenes can be rated, commented on and added to favourites, as well as listing other scenes that match a clicked-on tag.
Cons: -No downloading options unless you resort to third-party video capture tools.
-Scene selection by tag is limited to one tag via a gallery of photos with a tag each.
-Scene commenting doesn't work.
-Missing tags in some scenes, others have just one tag such as "latina", which given the theme of the site must include all scenes?
-Some content from 2014 and before recycled from other sites, not latina porn.
-Older content is not HD.
Bottom Line: I joined this site a few years ago and was impressed by the hot content featuring mostly Mexican performers, but since then the content has expanded from around 1150 scenes to over 2100 scenes and includes models from South America. As before, all the dialog is in Spanish with English subtitles which suits me fine, means I can watch scenes with the sound off and not miss any of the dialog.

Scenes average between 20 to 30 mins and date back to May 2005, featuring 193 models, most of whom I've never come across before.

Site layout is clean, responsive and very functional, with paged thumbnail scene listings showing nearly all scene info. Clicking into the scene detail allows you to stream the scene, rate it, add it to your favourites and leave comments. Clicking the model name leads to the model's page which also lists her scenes. There are also various tags/categories applicable to the scene which link to other scenes.

Scene storylines haven't changed much since my previous membership, are still based on the theme of a young lady having sex with an older relative/step-family-member or an older lady having sex with one or more young relatives or friends of their son, or their step-son. There are also various basic storylines and porn castings/initiations featuring 1-on-1, threesome etc. The variety of ladies - young, older, slim, full-figured - all seem to enjoy the sex, even when being pounded by one or more young guys.

One of my fave porn categories is creampie and features in many scenes, but the content has grown from just over 240 such scenes a few years back, to 714 scenes now! Looking at the content since my previous membership, it does seem that most scenes end with cumming just inside pussy or ass, so creampie lovers will be right at home here. Many scenes feature multiple cocks with DP; some of the lesbian scenes become a cock-sharing threesome and a few storylines feature a mentally-disabled guy with a huge cock - not very PC but of course a huge cock can't go to waste.

I'm not a fan of lots of tattoos but many of the models have a lot of them. There are lots of pretty obvious boob jobs too, so if you're turned off by those, that'll rule out quite a bit of content for you, though for me, the hotness of some of the fake-boobs ladies - notably Gili Diva, Teresa Ferrer and Vika Borja - more than makes up for it. I first assumed that Silvia Santez had fake boobs, but closer examination shows no sign of any scars/marks, so I have to conclude that she has the most amazing natural boobs I've seen, unless they're perfect fakes? There are plenty of latinas with big natural tits and asses.

The following are the major annoyances:
-no downloads means you have to resort to third-party streaming downloaders which makes downloading a hassle. The site was previously pretty strict with use of downloaders though (see my previous review) so they've obviously decided enough is enough and disabled the capability.
-a full-screen site logo always appears as a transition from one part of a scene to another, rather than just at the start of and end of the scene - it's an annoying feature of the production which is otherwise good with great camera angles, but when the guy apparently cumming inside the girl is interrupted by the site logo cutting in and then out to a view of his cock oozing cum pressed against her ass or pussy, it's an obvious attempt at faking it. This frequent intrusion of the site logo in most scenes is just annoying in otherwise well-produced scenes.
-the much older content is recycled from other sites, as evidenced by the watermark from another content-producer.
-scene comments don't appear at all, so no point in leaving them.

Membership includes other sites - Exposed Latinas, Sexmex Amateurs, Sex Mex Live (a cam site) and Transqueens. The content in these sites is a bit inconsistent compared with the main site, with just a few of the Sexmex girls featuring in the first two sites; I've little interest in the trans site so didn't spend much time with it but the content in each of these extra sites is very limited.

Despite the cons and annoyances, I still recommend this site because of the quality of the content but I've adjusted my overall score to take the drawbacks into consideration.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Make You Jerk Off

6. Make You Jerk Off (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
BatorAly (0) 11-07-23  07:31pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I was going to proclaim this a diamond in the rough site, but it no longer updates

Amateur (mostly?) women teasing, masturbating and posing provocatively to cause guys (and women) to masturbate while watching them.

HD video downloads

Good performances by the ladies. It’s easy to find these types of scenes with a shy, young woman who is nothing but boring.

Nearly 200 scenes of a genuinely unique niche.

Thanks to the smaller size of the site, it is easy to find exactly what you’re looking for
Cons: Back to the pro, the site has not updated in 6 months

The scenes are shorter than I think they should be and believe most men would agree
Bottom Line: My interest in the JOI niche continues with Make You Jerk Off. Let’s get the obvious joke out of the way. A lot of these scenes are less than 10 minutes. That’s assuming guys watching the scene will finish in under 10 minutes. I do think that would make for an interesting sub-niche. Have the models post times of which of their viewers finished fastest. Eventually, that could become a video proving how fast the woman makes the guy get off.

The biggest problem with the site is it’s no longer updating. It is, however, one of the bigger collections of JOI scenes, even without new updates. My favorite part about this niche is the niche doesn’t change, but nearly every scene is different. Some of the women like to be more dominant and even demanding. A few are insulting. Some are even into making jokes. The shyer women giggle and act like they just thought about a guy masturbating for the first time.

There are the models who make for good porn, too. These models not only get into teasing the camera, but even start masturbating themselves and often, very explicitly.

Make Me Jerk Off is one of the better JOI sites. I could rehash the joke and say it’s why the scenes are short. There are several theories about why this has become my favorite niche of porn. I think the top reason is, the scenes are all at least a little different. It gives the scenes a more unscripted feeling. There are any videos on this particular site that make you think the female loses control and just gives in to her desires. That’s something I think porn needs to focus on more. Showing the actor/actress being so turned on that they have to join the viewer in masturbating. That is more interactive than VR is to me.

You also don’t have to worry about the story or plot of the scenes. There’s not one. It’s a nude or semi-nude woman teasing the viewer. She will either sink or swim based on her energy and efforts. I do believe this niche has a lot of untapped potential.

The videos are downloadable with no limits and just like every other JOI site I join, I have downloaded every scene. The model selection is a little better, in my opinion, on this site than most JOI sites. There are more amateur looking and acting models. It seems like to me the best female at this niche wouldn't be a porn star. There’s much more to this niche than just physical attraction and this site shows that well.

Some will also notice a major potential con – all you get with a membership is this site. Most JOI sites are included in networks.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Herzog Videos

7. Herzog Videos (0)

Pay
Newbie
72*
pinkerton (0) 11-01-23  03:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Hardcore mix, looks very dated, probably 90s.
Straightforward navigation and clean site design, also mobile device-friendly (but see cons).
Search works across scene titles, model names and categories/tags.
Scene index thumbnails have a badge to indicate whether the scene is a favourite.
Model index with links to scenes and is sortable by name, update date or popularity.
Can save scenes as favourites and leave comments.
Favourite scenes listed in order that they were favourited.
Downloaded scene videos are very reasonable file size.
No restrictions on downloads and supports download managers.
Responsive support via email.
Vendo billing.
PU discount.
Cons: Some features such as comments, liking a scene and flagging an issue with a scene don't work.
Inconsistent/poor download performance for many scenes, varies from less than 2Mbps up to 8Mbps.
No model bio, just list of scenes.
Some scenes have streaming thumbnails for an entirely different scene.
Too many scenes lack any scene length info.
Tags/categories link to videos from all networks rather than just the current one.
Downloads button doesn't do file download, you need to right-click and choose "Save link as" or whatever your browser provides.
Maximum video size is 1080p full HD - no 4K.
Older content is 720p rather than 1080p.
Comments and favourites functionalty is scene detail page is is very unresponsive and slow.
Odd behaviour of favourites badge on mobile devices.
Bottom Line: The name of the site brings to mind the famous movie director Werner Herzog, but this site has nothing to do with him or his work.

It features plenty of 90s hardcore German porn action covering lesbian, domination, threesomes and group sex. At least one scene features anal. The content is mostly from the 90s so it looks very dated, though still hot.

The site functionality is straighforward and effective, with paged scene listings and scene detail pages from where you can stream the scene, download it, like it, add it to your favourites, add comments, flag/raise issues with the scene for support purposes.

You can filter the scene listings by category (anal, DP, etc) but only by one category, which isn't necessarily a big deal.

A nice touch is that scene thumbnails indicate whether the scene is in your favourites list.

Very usefully, the scenes in the favourites page are in the order the scene was favourited and so easy to keep track of - I've come across a number of large sites where there are unofficial limits on numbers of favourites and so favourited scenes end up quietly dropping off the cliff.

As someone who generally watches porn on a mobile, favourites scenes and then downloads them when on my PC or laptop, I appreciated the otherwise good mobile functionality.

There are a number of negative aspects of the site:
- clicking on the download link just loads the scene in a new browser window, forcing you to use the "Save link as" option provided by your browser to actually download the scene.
- submitting comments is very unresponsive - from hitting the comment it takes up to 30 seconds for your comment to appear and sometimes it doesn't.
- clicking the "Add to Favourites" button results in nothing happening until after between several seconds and thirty seconds.
- the links to actors is by actor name rather than a unique id, so a scene starring say Angelina, will link to a list of scenes starring an actor named Angelina and not necessarily the same actor from the scene you clicked from.
- on phone or tablet, the "favourite" badge on a scene thumbnail doesn't appear with the device in portrait mode, only if landscape mode.

I watched a lot of the content from this site but didn't download anything from it, so I guess that sums up my liking for it. If vintage 90s porn is your thing, you'll like this site, other than that it does include other sites from the Gasm network, so it's worth joining for loads of other qulaity content.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cosplay Babes

8. Cosplay Babes (0)

Pay
Newbie
77*
pinkerton (0) 10-09-23  04:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Straightforward navigation and clean site design, also mobile device-friendly (but see cons).
Search works across scene titles, model names and categories/tags.
Scene index thumbnails have a badge to indicate whether the scene is a favourite.
Model index with links to scenes and is sortable by name, update date or popularity.
Can save scenes as favourites and leave comments.
Favourite scenes listed in order that they were favourited.
Downloaded scene videos are very reasonable file size.
No restrictions on downloads and supports download managers.
Responsive support via email.
Vendo billing.
PU discount.
Cons: Not much content at 137 scenes.
Few updates.
Some features such as comments, liking a scene and flagging an issue with a scene don't work.
Inconsistent/poor download performance for many scenes, varies from less than 2Mbps up to 8Mbps.
No model bio, just list of scenes.
Comments and favourites functionalty in scene detail page is is very unresponsive and slow.
Odd behaviour of favourites badge on mobile devices.
Bottom Line: As per the site name, the action here is cosplay or costume-play, featuring girls dressed up as superhero, fantasy, cartoon or a famous film or TV series character, so think Star Trek, Grease, Bewitched, Supergirl, Catwoman and so on.

Scenes are a mix or hardcore and solo with some serious interracial, group sex and anal. The action can be pretty rough.

The most memorable scenes for me were the Uhura and Star Trek scenes, but otherwise I'm not much of a cosplay fan so not much of it appealed to me enough to download more than a few scenes.

The site functionality is straighforward and effective, with paged scene listings and scene detail pages from where you can stream the scene, download it, like it, add it to your favourites, add comments, flag/raise issues with the scene for support purposes.

You can filter the scene listings by category (anal, DP, etc) but only by one category, which isn't necessarily a big deal.

A nice touch is that scene thumbnails indicate whether the scene is in your favourites list.

Very usefully, the scenes in the favourites page are in the order the scene was favourited and so easy to keep track of - I've come across a number of large sites where there are unofficial limits on numbers of favourites and so favourited scenes end up quietly dropping off the cliff.

As someone who generally watches porn on a mobile, favourites scenes and then downloads them when on my PC or laptop, I appreciated the otherwise good mobile functionality.

There are a number of negative aspects of the site:
- clicking on the download link just loads the scene in a new browser window, forcing you to use the "Save link as" option provided by your browser to actually download the scene.
- submitting comments is very unresponsive - from hitting the comment it takes up to 30 seconds for your comment to appear and sometimes it doesn't.
- clicking the "Add to Favourites" button results in nothing happening until after between several seconds and thirty seconds.
- the links to actors is by actor name rather than a unique id, so a scene starring say Angelina, will link to a list of scenes starring an actor named Angelina and not necessarily the same actor from the scene you clicked from.
- on phone or tablet, the "favourite" badge on a scene thumbnail doesn't appear with the device in portrait mode, only if landscape mode.

Overall, if cosplay sex is your thing, then you'll like this site though as with the other small sites on the Gasm network, it's not worth the membership cost by itself, but the huge amount of quality content included in the other network sites means you get a lot for your membership, so I recommend it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Harmony Vision

9. Harmony Vision (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
pinkerton (0) 05-02-23  09:16am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Over 960 scenes of hardcore with hot Euro babes.
Straightforward navigation and clean site design, also mobile device-friendly (but see cons).
Search works across scene titles, model names and categories/tags.
Scene index thumbnails have a badge to indicate whether the scene is a favourite.
Model index with links to scenes and is sortable by name, update date or popularity.
Can save scenes as favourites and leave comments.
Favourite scenes listed in order that they were favourited.
Downloaded scene videos are very reasonable file size.
No restrictions on downloads and supports download managers.
Responsive support via email.
Vendo billing.
PU discount.
Cons: Some features such as comments, liking a scene and flagging an issue with a scene don't work.
Inconsistent/poor download performance for many scenes, varies from less than 2Mbps up to 8Mbps.
No model bio, just list of scenes.
Some scenes have streaming thumbnails for an entirely different scene.
Too many scenes lack any scene length info.
A few of the downloaded scenes are cut short.
Many scenes have no tags/categories.
Downloads button doesn't do file download, you need to right-click and choose "Save link as" or whatever your browser provides.
Maximum video size is 1080p full HD - no 4K.
Older content is 720p rather than 1080p.
Comments and favourites functionalty is scene detail page is is very unresponsive and slow.
Odd behaviour of favourites badge on mobile devices.
Bottom Line: The tagline for this site os "no holes barred", which hints that the content here is harder-core than just hardcore and the content bears that out.

There's over 960 scenes spread over 174 movies/DVDs of Euro babes getting fucked by well-hung studs. There are some UK and US models but mostly it's Eurobabes getting both holes fucked, so lovers of anal will be happy. Generally if there are two cocks or more in the scene, the girl(s) will be DPed. The girls are generally young - no MILFs or matures here - with a fair number of scenes featuring them wearing stockings, which I always appreciate.

Production is good, with good lighting and camera angles. The sex is vigorous rather than rough, with the girl's holes fucked in the usual positions; scene endings are the usual facial, cum on tits, pussy and/or ass, with pussy and a fair few creampie endings, which I love. There are a few lesbian scenes including at least one where the final third of the scene introduces a cock that gets down to a threesome with the two babes.

Regarding the content, there are a lot of scenes featuring my favourite Russian slut Henessy, who I think is one of porn's finest, along with quite a number of scenes with French sluts Angell Summers and Tiffany Doll, in addition to scenes with Christen Courtney, Tina Kay and Lady Dee who are all consistently hot performers.

Regarding using the site, the functionality is straighforward and effective, with paged scene listings and scene detail pages from where you can stream the scene, download it, like it, add it to your favourites, add comments, flag/raise issues with the scene for support purposes. You can filter the scene listings by category (anal, DP, etc) but only by one category, which isn't necessarily a big deal.

There are some nice touches such as:
- scene thumbnails indicate whether the scene is in your favourites list.
- scenes in the favourites page are in the order the scene was favourited and so easy to keep track of - I've come across a number of large sites where there are unofficial limits on numbers of favourites and so favourited scenes end up quietly dropping off the cliff.

There are a number of negative aspects of the site:
- more than a few scenes are missing any video to stream or download.
- clicking on the download link just loads the scene in a new browser window, forcing you to use the "Save link as" option provided by your browser to actually download the scene.
- flagging a scene does not work, in fact the website returns a "Server error 500" behind the scenes.
- submitting comments is very unresponsive - from hitting the comment it takes up to 30 seconds for your comment to appear and sometimes it doesn't.
- clicking the "Add to Favourites" button results in nothing happening until after between several seconds and thirty seconds.
- some oddity with the paged favourites list: when the last page of the favourites list is "full", adding one more favourite doesn't result in an new last page containing that new favourite, so the most recently added favourite doesn't appear in the favourites list at all, at least not until you add another new favourite so that the last favourites page contains at least two items, after which all is well.
- the links to actors is by actor name rather than a unique id, so a scene starring say Angelina, will link to a list of scenes starring an actor named Angelina and not necessarily the same actor from the scene you clicked from.
- on phone or tablet, the "favourite" badge on a scene thumbnail doesn't appear with the device in portrait mode, only if landscape mode.
- when streaming a scene you can drag along the timeline slider and see thumbnails for the scene at the selected point in the video, but for many scenes the thumbnails shown are for a completely different scene, rendering the functionality very hit and miss. The same goes for the scene listing thumbnails - hovering over a thumbnail shows preview thumbnails from an entirely different scene.

As someone who generally watches porn on a mobile, favourites scenes and then downloads them when on my PC or laptop, I appreciated the otherwise good mobile functionality.

I'd seen a fair bit of content from Harmony Vision on some of the mega-sites, but not much of it, whereas here there's loads of content. Also, membership includes a number of other sites providing a huge amount of content so you're getting a lot for your membership. Despite the site being a bit rough around the edges, the quality of the content makes it worth it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Magma Film

10. Magma Film (0)

Pay
Newbie
89*
pinkerton (0) 05-02-23  08:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Over 1500 scenes of German and Euro hardcore featuring hot sluts and babes.
Straightforward navigation and clean site design, also mobile device-friendly (but see cons).
Search works across scene titles, model names and categories/tags.
Scene index thumbnails have a badge to indicate whether the scene is a favourite.
Model index with links to scenes and is sortable by name, update date or popularity.
Can save scenes as favourites and leave comments.
Favourite scenes listed in order that they were favourited.
Downloaded scene videos are very reasonable file size.
No restrictions on downloads and supports download managers.
Responsive support via email.
Vendo billing.
PU discount.
Cons: Some duplicate content, though not enough to be too concerned.
Photosets contain very few photos and aren't downloable as ZIP files - seems pointless and not worth bothering with.
Some features such as comments, liking a scene and flagging an issue with a scene don't work.
Inconsistent/poor download performance for many scenes, varies from less than 2Mbps up to 8Mbps.
No model bio, just list of scenes.
Many scenes lack any model info.
Some scenes have streaming thumbnails for an entirely different scene.
Many scenes lack scene length info.
Scene quality varies quite a bit, especially the oldest scenes.
Downloads button doesn't do file download, you need to right-click and choose "Save link as" or whatever your browser provides.
Maximum video size is 1080p full HD - no 4K.
Oldest content not HD.
Comments and favourites functionalty is scene detail page is is very unresponsive and slow.
Odd behaviour of favourites badge on mobile devices.
Bottom Line: German porn is pretty unique in it's own way, the frauleins are hot and slutty and engage in hardcore action that's more intense and extreme than many porn sites - I'm not saying that the sex is rough, it's just that German porn is dirtier (for want of a better word) and this site delivers it.

There's over 1500 scenes here, spread over 344 movies/DVDs of German and Euro babes getting fucked by young, old and somewhere-in-between studs. There's a variety of themes and settings - from the "random" street pickups, to a pair of hotties knocking on doors looking for willing guys to fuck them and be filmed, to straight scenes of one or more guys fucking one or more gals, with threesomes, group sex, swinger parties and more. Seeing as this is German porn there's plenty of anal, quite a lot of DP and creampie. The one thing I noticed (and loved) is that at least a third of the content features ladies wearing stockings, so they obviously appreciate the difference lingerie makes to a scene.

Regarding the ladies, the one thing that does stand out is that a good proportion of them have extensive tattoos, not just sleeves and legs but entire backs and chests, which for me detracts from a lot of the content; of course if you're a tattoos fan or don't mind them, you'll love the hot slutty girls with their near-perfect bodies. That said, there's a varied range of ladies: young, MILF and granny, some of whom aren't exactly babes but what they may lack in conventional beauty they make up for in attitude and fuck with energy and vigour, easily matching the boys. Only in German porn have I come across girls with great bodies who aren't what one would consider babes, but man, they look incredible when fucking, which I reckon is more important than a pretty face taking a cock or more inside.

It's also worth mentioning that a fair number of the ladies here have fake boobs and some also have a lot of metalwork in their clit, which I don't care for at all, it's quite a turn-off for me but then so are fake boobs when they're overdone and obvious. Quite a few scenes feature condoms, though most scenes are entirely bareback.

Production is good, with plenty of lighting and camera angles that make the most of a scene, so in a DP it'll focus on the cocks pumping in and out of the girls holes, moving out to the whole scene and then around to her front and face, with similar focus on the cock in pussy/ass for a creampie. The sex involves the usual positions and endings are the usual facial, cum on tits, pussy and/or ass, with the aforementioned pussy and anal creampie endings.

Regarding using the site, the functionality is straighforward and effective, with paged scene listings and scene detail pages from where you can stream the scene, download it, like it, add it to your favourites, add comments, flag/raise issues with the scene for support purposes. You can filter the scene listings by category (anal, DP, etc) but only by one category, which isn't necessarily a big deal.

There are some nice touches such as:
- scene thumbnails indicate whether the scene is in your favourites list.
- scenes in the favourites page are in the order the scene was favourited and so easy to keep track of - I've come across a number of large sites where there are unofficial limits on numbers of favourites and so favourited scenes end up quietly dropping off the cliff.

There are a number of negative things I came across, though there's no enough space in this section to go into detail so I've added them to the comments.

As someone who generally watches porn on a mobile, favourites scenes and then downloads them when on my PC or laptop, I appreciated the otherwise good mobile functionality.

Customer service was responsive - at first I couldn't stream all scenes on my mobile devices, but was soon rectified after contacting support via their portal.

Sign-up was interesting - I opted for the two day $1.00 trial, which doesn't provide downloading so I decided to cancel at which point I was offered a deal to upgrade to a full month membership including downloads for $19.98 and seeing as I was happy with the content I'd seen, decided to accept the offer, saving on paying the full $29.99 for a month membership.
There's a 50% PU discount but I'm not sure if that includes downloading. To be honest, I'm not sure if downloads are an extra on top of any of the subscription prices.

I'd had my eye on Magmafilm for a while, I've been a member of other German porn sites in the past and have welcomed their difference to the usual hardcore sites and in that regard this site doesn't disappoint. It also includes a number of other sites providing a huge amount of content so you're getting a lot for your membership. Despite the site being a bit rough around the edges, the important stuff is all there so I recommend it.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Straight Boys Fucking

11. Straight Boys Fucking (0)

Pay
Newbie
64*
standard02 (0) 04-06-23  06:56pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - downloads will resume if your connection is interrupted
- epoch is an option for billing
- no download limits
Cons: - No download limits mean you could grab all the videos from this small site in an hour or two if their speeds were modern
- did I mention that speeds are really bad?
- Free tube quality videos
Bottom Line: The only reason I joined is I'd seen a clip on a tube site and was interested in the female in the clip. I wasn't sure why the site made a big deal out of the guys being straight, but after watching you realize it's probably a site designed to appeal to gay men who might have some sort of fetish regarding women, or more specifically, men who are attracted to women, because you don't get to see much of the womens faces. There are a couple of attractive women on the site, but any action will be focused on the faces or bits of the males in the scene, many of which present themselves as liking other men more than the woman (to the point where they engage at times). The woman is a prop. One video is two "straight" guys having a bizarre threeway with a blowup doll, which might be the strangest premise that I've ever seen.

When you join there is a bonus pulldown at the top of the screen that directs you to a half dozen or so gay sites, so that helps support that this must be a gay fetish site.

Not a lot of pretty is the nicest way to describe the style of the actors, sets, and filming. My best attempt to ask you to imagine lots of early 1990s punk rock cosplayers as filtered through an eastern European nation except it's probably Portland. Many of the locations have junk on the floor or stacked in the room where it's being filmed, and there are often sheets or blankets over the windows. It helps with the cosplay punk rock feel I guess, but it's kind of depressing, especially when combined with poor lighting and cinematography and grainy video.

I've already covered how there's not a lot of focus on the ladies, but the part I wasn't expecting was that the paid video quality appears to be the same as tube site quality. The oldest videos show 320x240, and it looks as terrible as you'd imagine. With others that look a bit better than early 2000s clips, the video resolution in VLC it shows 720x480. There are no other download options, so that seems to be the only resolution available. Some of the older videos show 960x540, but visually there is no difference between the two. There's a big size difference, though. (100mb vs 500mb)

I compared it to the lower quality but still okay looking non-hd videos at a few other sites:
Teamskeet "high" 1024x576
adulttime 960x544

The adulttime is the one that is puzzling because it's still very watchable (as is the teamskeet clip). I guess it's camera differences, or maybe it's filmed in HD and re-encoded into lower resolutions, but these look night and day in comparison to the ones on this site. Like I said, the videos look like what you'd find on free tube sites. I couldn't find any resolution options.

One more notes regarding the speed: More than once I saw a file that was smaller than 100mb take two minutes to download.

I could see this appealing to a very specialized niche, but unless you've read this and thought "Oh yeah, that's my thing" then you might be disappointed.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit She Is Nerdy

12. She Is Nerdy (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
LKLK (0) 11-06-22  04:22am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -This is not a pro, but an important fact that should be noted:
If you join the site (She Is Nerdy) directly, the price is $29.95/month, or $119.95/year.
Joining through the Dirty Flix site (with a PU discount), the price is $15/month or $60/year, during holiday specials.
I joined for $60/year (recurring) during a holiday special. These discounts are given many times throughout the year.
Whether you join She Is Nerdy or Dirty Flix, you have access to the same sites. There are no sites in the network requiring a premium fee.
-The site (and network) is teen oriented. There is a ton of cute young models (mainly from Russia and surrounding areas) at the network.
-You get around 14 sites with a membership to the site or network.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads, as far as I can tell.
-Site updates with 3 or 4 new videos per month.
-Videos are presented in low, medium and high definition. For the last few years they've offered a 4K definition.
Cons: -There appears to be both an open and a secure login page for the site/network.
If you open a non-secure login page, put a https in front of the address in the address section of your browser, and that should get you a secure page.
Secure pages are less prone to hacking, and also keep your usage details more private.
For example:
http://members.dirtyflix.com/en/ is not secure.
https://members.dirtyflix.com/en/ is secure.
-Not much effort is put into making the models attractive or glamourous with either make-up or clothing. But these are young (mainly late teen or early 20s) models who are naturally attractive.
-There is very little diversity in the models. Not a con for me, since these are white, slender teens, with attractive faces and bodies.
-In addition to the cheap clothes the models wear, the sets are also cheap. Cheap locations, cheap furniture. The saving grace is the models are attractive, and you can ignore the threadbare plots.
Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED):
-Ads on every page, standard for porn sites.
-The photosets are screencaps, so the quality is poor or just OK. Not worth collecting, even when the models are cute.

BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Network stats:
Videos: 1626
Duration: 706 hours
Pics: 118,069
Models: 832
Data size: 2,234.53 TB

Looking at the network stats, you see that the network has a large amount of content.
The site stats include 177 videos plus matching photosets.

-The network has around 14 sites, so you get some diversity in the theme.
There is very little plot to the videos. You get a guy and a girl, and they suck and fuck. Little foreplay, it must be the water in Russia that makes these guys and gals so horny. (Joke, but it accurately describes the recurring plot, which is, "Hi, lets fuck already).

The site theme is "She is nerdy." They often establish this by having the model wear glasses. Or by putting her in a library or book store at the start of the video, to show she is intelligent or nerdy. What used to be called a bookworm, when I was growing up (in the Dark Ages).
But even nerdy girls are hot to trot, at least the ones shown at this site.

There are many fine teen networks on the internet.
If you find a holiday special, where you can join for $60 for a year, this might be a worthwhile join. The content is mainly exclusive. Although most models are featured at many different teen sites, the videos themselves are basically exclusive to the site.
The network gives you a chance to see some of your favorite Russian porn stars starting out as teens.

Could the site (and network) be improved? Obviously.
The technical features of the videos are good.
The cheap sets, cheap clothes, lack of a plot which might make the sex more memorable, degrade the viewing experience.
But if you know beforehand what to expect, $60 for a year's worth of porn is not bad.
There are many sites/networks I would join before joining this one, but the site/network is not a ripoff.
You get hundreds of cute East European teens, which is the main draw.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lady Voyeurs

13. Lady Voyeurs (0)

Pay
Newbie
96*
KayTBuffs (0) 10-11-22  07:30pm
Rookie Badge  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: My favorite site on my favorite network.

Women watching, joining, instructing a guy to masturbate. She’s usually clothed.

Comes with Pure CFNM, a full network of CFNM sites.

Believable very attractive females with average guys.

Unlimited downloadable videos and pictures.

The theme makes a story useless. You know the story just from what you see.
Cons: Tries too hard to stick to the CF part of CFNM.

Some scenes go into degrading the males.
Bottom Line: This site has improved over the years. Most of the improvement is in the recognition of their scenes becoming redundant due to the CFNM genre. Adding Lady Voyeur to CFNM is, in theory, a perfect blend, but we are still talking about porn where men far outnumber female viewers. This niche sticks to one or more women watching a man masturbate. I’m sure there are men who wouldn’t enjoy this type of porn – especially when you factor in the degradation.

Having said that, Lady Voyeur, typically shows the female as being very aroused and even entertained while watching the man masturbate.

There are scenarios that pop up in every scene like will the guy’s cum hit the woman? Will the female get more involved? Will the female masturbate too? It’s one of the few niches that keeps an open window for what “could” happen in each scene.

There still is the problem of this type of porn doesn’t leave much room for a lot of fetishes or niches. While it is called Voyeur, it’s not really voyeur other than the woman watching the man. da room. There is nothing blocking the woman from seeing the man or him seeing her looking at him. That’s why I said the voyeur part Is questionable if it’s really voyeur.

You also get full access to Pure CFNM, by far and away, the biggest and best CFNM network. The downloads are unlimited and there are photosets with most scenes. I just enjoy the question of how involved will the female get in the scene. The scenes can be downloaded in high definition and the photos are high resolution. I do think they could make the scenes longer and add more variety to the Lady Voyeurs scenes, but it’s a minor complaint for a site that does a lot more right than wrong. The access to Pure CFNM is just a major bonus.

This is a great deal if you’re new to CFNM. While the different niches in the genre are limited, those are still enough to change things up so that you can enjoy it without feeling like it’s redundant. You’ll only be disappointed if you’re expecting intercourse or oral sex. Which is something I like about Lady Voyeurs, you will see the women tease those and maybe give the guy a little oral. It makes every scene worth watching from beginning to end. The key there is CFNM is not an action. Porn usually specifies its niche or genre by the name of the site like “Only Blowjob”. Pure CFNM just tells you there will be clothed females and nude males. The actions are not mentioned.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit VideosZ

14. VideosZ (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
exotics4me (0) 08-01-22  08:55am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - I believe it’s the largest of the DVD sites at current time.
- The overall numbers are a major plus but the various fetishes and niches interest me more.
- Nearly all newer DVDs are HD and they have over 10,000 HD DVDS, plus over 20,000 SD DVDs
- Very good download speeds (80% of max) which is important when downloading DVD scenes.
- Plenty of classic stars, scenes and DVDs too.
- Two new DVDs added per day.
Cons: - There’s a reason a site can have nearly 30,000 DVDs, add two per day, nearly 150,000 scenes and 20,000 porn stars. A lot of it is bargain bin level. It used to be a lot of fun to try and sift through all these scenes to try and find that one diamond in the rough. Your mileage will (not may) vary. Bottom line will explain my method.
- Navigation is starting to become useless. I use the genre tab but even then, there’s a good chance someone used the wrong tag or forgot a tag.
Bottom Line: When you join a DVD site you should know what you’re getting into. While there are DVDs from top studios across the world, there are some that are just a thrown together DVD of 5-6 similar scenes to fit the theme of the DVD’s title. You shouldn’t be expecting anything groundbreaking or revolutionary. These types of sites started with one main focus. Quantity. And for a long time, it was quantity over quality. I’m talking about technical quality. I don’t remember when the DVD sites started landing HD DVDs but Videosz does seem to be at the front of that group. They have over 10,000 DVDs that are in HD quality. If you’re not used to DVD porn, you may need to know this. Each DVD has 4-6 scenes on it. That means there are over 50,000 scenes on Videosz that are in HD quality.

I approach a DVD site the same way I have for around 10 years. Before that, I searched by model and that’s the easiest way to build yourself a large collection of your favorite model(s). There are models on here with over 100 scenes. I got out of that method as more and more of my favorite models kept retiring or god forbid … aging. I thought porn was fiction?

I started focusing on the niches, genres, fetishes and the specifics. You will find that these DVD sites are very good about filling your fetish needs. Even better than sites that revolve around one fetish. Who cares if it’s not exclusive? That kind of went out the window a decade ago. If I haven’t seen it, it’s exclusive and new to me. Here on Videosz they have 1,110 Handjob scenes, it’s likely higher than that. The numbers are usually a little behind. Even so, that’s bigger than any handjob site on the internet. If you like your scenes with at least four people, they have almost 3,000 of those scenes. If you like lesbian scenes they have over 13,000. I’m positive no lesbian site has that many scenes. If your fetishes and kinks included handjobs, lesbian and group sex scenes you just found the biggest source for all 3.

That is the value in a DVD site. The price is cheap. HD downloads on many of the scenes and you really don’t have to focus that much on what content you’re looking for since you should already know.

Videosz has pushed forward and started adding scenes from genres that go a little outside the straight sex world. They now have bisexual men and transsexual. The bisexual scenes are only around 500 according to their numbers and transsexual scenes are 1,400. You get a large variety of genres and a large amount of scenes. The only thing I can find to really complain about is a site like this one would be perfect for someone new to porn. You could try out all of the different genres and niches to see what you like and what you don’t. But I feel like a person new to porn would just be overwhelmed on the site. There’s so much content and a lot of it isn’t good. I have always recommended sites like this one to experienced collectors that are tired of joining a site that only covers one genre.

Everything works well in the navigation unless you start getting too specific. There are tags that you can click to find similar scenes. It’s just too much content to go through that. What ends up happening, you will want to use more than 1 tag for your search and the tags start breaking if you use more than one. If you chose Teen, then chose handjob. It may give you Teens giving handjobs but it also may mix it all up. That was also always a problem for DVD sites.

It's still a good and relevant site that is worth joining maybe every other year.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Fucking Glasses

15. Fucking Glasses (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
LKLK (0) 06-21-22  06:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of the Dirty Flix network of around 12 sites. Join any site, you get access to all the network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. But check to be sure, because it's very unusual for a join page not to have at least one pre-checked cross-sale.
-On videos, they give you both mp4 and wmv file formats. The newer videos have mp4 definition for mobile devices, on up to 4K.
-Navigation is basic but adequate.
-You have tags and category labels to describe the videos, but no plot summary. Except there's not much plot. You have a guy, a girl, and they have sex.
Cons: -The default for the login page and the member pages are not secure. But if you put "https" (without the quotation marks) in front of the login page, or if you go directly to the member page and put that "https" in the address bar, your login and the member pages will be secure.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is sub-par for a hardcore porn site. At least, the porn sites that I subscribe to.
-Regular price is expensive: $30/month, or $120/year. But you can find holiday specials for $60/year. The holiday specials are for the dirty flix network, which includes the Fucking Glasses site. Normally, if you want to save money, search for a discount to the network, not an individual site in the network. It's much easier finding discounts to the network name, instead of a discount to one of the network sites.
Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED):
-One problem with porn sites are the names. You join enough sites, all the names start to seem the same. I'm a member of Dirty Flix. Also a member of Filth Flix, which are competing sites.
The same people who run (or own?) Dirty Flix also run 18 Videoz, and both Dirty Flix and 18 Videoz share some of the same video content. Both Dirty Flix and 18 Videoz focus on hardcore teen porn.
-Videos have an accompanying photoset, that you can download. But almost all the photosets are made of screencaps, so the quality of the photosets is poor, and they aren't worth collecting.
-The sound track for the video goes in and out. So it doesn't match what the actors are saying. Not a big deal, since the dialog is basically bullshit, but it just adds to the cheap impression of the video.
-Ads for other sites on every member page. Standard for porn sites. But since a lot of the site videos seem boring, you click on the ads of attractive models for other sites, but don't join, since the ads don't offer attractive discounts.
-The site has 123 movies. So it's a small site.
-The update rate is very irregular.
The most recent video was posted Feb 28, 2020.
Before that, you would get 2 or 3 videos in a year.
-The camera focus is often poor. They need a better camera operator to film these videos.

BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is a guy who has a camera concealed in his glasses is secretly filming his pickups. So this is supposed to be voyeur sex. Which gives you chills when you realize the girls getting fucked are unaware they are being filmed (Sarcasm. You're supposed to enjoy the video more because the girl supposedly doesn't know the encounter is being filmed.).

I'm giving the site a score of 75.
The cons outweigh the pros.
A small site. Last update was Feb 2020. Before that, you would get 2 or 3 new videos per year.
The models are not very attractive. Even when you have an attractive girl, she isn't presented to her best advantage. The way you photograph or video a model can make a tremendous difference in how appealing she appears. And the models at this site just don't appeal to me.
The network is called dirty flix, and that's what the site videos are: cheap sex videos.
I mean, there are some models at the site that are physically very attractive: Alaina Dawson, Inga Zolva, etc. But the videos don't use that physical beauty to make clear, crisp videos with good lighting, good sound control, nice sets, good camera work.
The videos are just low-grade videos. And the photosets are cheap screen cap collections.
So what's the value of the site?
Look at a few videos, and decide if it's worth your time to watch these videos.
I don't think it's worth my time.
I'd rather watch better videos.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Parody Pass

16. Parody Pass (0)

Pay
Newbie
78*
LKLK (0) 06-08-22  02:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of the New Sensations network. So you get access to all the New Sensations sites.
-Unlimited streaming. Downloads are limited to 300 GB, which is generous.
-You can stream videos in 720p and 1080p, with multiple bit rates for each definition.
-You can download videos in 720p and 1080p, with multiple bit rates for each definition.
-You get a nice, short text description of the plot of the video, plus tags for the video that can be used to search for your sex niches and fetishes.
Cons: -Site stopped updating around 10-10-2018.
-Site gives me slow download speeds. I have a 200 Mbps connection, but my wireless connection can drop to 9 Mbps.
Theoretically, I've read that the minimum speeds required for:
SD (480p): 3+ Mbps.
HD (720–1080p): 5–13+ Mbps.
4K (UHD, 2160p): 16–25 Mbps.

So even 9 Mbps, which my wireless speed can drop to, should be fine for 720p videos.
But it doesn't work that way.
On my monitor, the stream is not smooth for 720p. And if I try to fast forward the video, the playback will stop completely.

The way to get around slow streaming speeds is to download the video, and play the file on your PC.

The technical features of some of the videos are top-quality. They have plot and some special effects and good to excellent video, nice sets, nice costumes, etc.
Bottom Line: The videos at Parody Pass don't have a single focus or tone: they might try to be serious, or comical, or stupidly funny.
In contrast, the stories at Pure Taboo, a site in the Adult Time network, can be interesting and add to the impact of the sex. The Pure Taboo videos are trying to create an artistic, erotic visual experience where the sex is illicit. The Pure Taboo site is probably the finest story-driven porn site I've seen.

Candide, a novel by Votaire, published in 1759, was a satire on the Leibniz philosophy of optimism. The novel Candy, by Terry Southern and Mason Hoffenberg, written around 1958, was supposed to be a satire of Candide.

Candide, and Candy, are both considered comical, or humorous. I read them years ago, and enjoyed both of them. The humor is not really laugh-out-loud funny. More a quiet humor that, "Oh, I get the idea, and it's nice".

The Sex Files #2 is an imitation of The X-Files with sex.
My idea of parody movies include Airplane!, Blazing Saddles, Young Frankenstein, Hot Shots!. A movie where you get exaggerated ideas or acting that is supposed to be funny or enjoyable.

"The Sex Files #2" is not funny for me. It's not enjoyable. It's a waste of time.

On reflection, I realize that by "parody" what they mean is "imitation". The Sex Files #2 is an imitation of The X-Files. It was not meant to be funny, but interesting and enjoyable. Spiced with sex. But at 2 hours runtime, I was bored.

Reasons why I don't like the site:
I don't appreciate the humor of the videos.
I've never followed most of the TV shows that are parodied.
So the parodies don't strike a chord in my mind, that makes me laugh or appreciate the points being parodied.
Also, some of the parodies are just not funny.

The technical qualities of the videos are good to excellent. The acting by the models is OK for porn videos, which sets a low bar for acting. The sets are nice, the filming is done professionally: good focus, good lighting, good sound control, nice colors.

I'm giving the site a score of boring 78. That's a new category for boring sex and boring videos.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Four Finger Club

17. Four Finger Club (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
LKLK (0) 03-25-22  09:28pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of the New Sensations network. You can usually find a holiday special of $60/year. The regular price with a PU discount is $120.
-New Sensations has around 15 sites. You get access to all the sites, none require a premium upgrade.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. No captcha or other problems.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-They did a network update, and made the public page and member pages refreshed with bigger thumbnails that makes the network and sites more appealing.
-A lot of attractive models. You can find loads of attractive models at many hard and soft porn sites. I can't say these models are exceptional, but many are attractive to very attractive.
-You can stream videos, or download them, in 720p, 1080p, 4K in 2 different bit rates for each definition.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons: -Last update was in February 2021.
-A page of ads when you log in, before you get to the member's area.
-Ads on every member page.
-The plots are mainly simplistic. Most porn stars/models are not very good actors. So you're depending on the model's good looks and acting ability to create some heat. Some models are fine actors, or they have some chemistry that jumps off the monitor to make a photo or video have heat.
-Lots of toy use. That's a plus or minus, depending on your personal preference. Hitachi wand (the big-sized vibrator) and Sybian saddle (a vibrating dildo that a woman can ride) in different videos.
-A fair number of the videos are interview of the models. Again, a plus or minus, depending on your personal preference. If I like a model, I'm more interested in her interview.
Bottom Line: Site theme is lesbians having sex.
I think the plots are minimal. Many of the plots involve sex between a younger woman and an older woman (older woman in her late 30s or 40s). Many of the older women have breast implants.

Ivy Wolfe is a slut. I think she retired from porn in 2018. Cute face, slender body. She can put on a show. When I say "slut", I don't mean to be dis-respectful. I'm teasing. Ivy is lovely (she's more like cute or slightly pretty) and fucking hot.

Compare her to Alya Stark (aka Arya Stark), who is physically lovely, but her porn scenes are more sensual, not the same eroticism or heat, but Alya Stark is so gorgeous, you just want to kiss and lick and fuck that gorgeous face and body for hours.

Both models put on a show that's believable, and the models really seem to be getting off.
Note: Ivy Wolfe appears in Four Finger Club and HotWifeXXX.
Alya Stark does not appear in New Sensations, but I used her an example of a lovely young model (physically) who puts on a wonderful show.

Some of the videos have really attractive women.
And the videos can be slow, sensual, fun. Watch Eden Arya (aka Eden Addams) and Riley Nixon having some fun. Video titled "Eden's Trust Riley Will Take It Further", posted 08/18/2017.

Bottom line: there are plenty of cute or attractive models at the site.
And many of the videos are definitely worth watching.
You just have to sort through to find the videos that appeal to you.



The main benefit of the site is that it's part of the New Sensations network, which has a lot of attractive models, and a lot of videos and photosets that are worth examining.
I don't think this is one of the better lesbian sites, because I don't enjoy too many of the videos. But that's just me. If you personally enjoy more of the videos, then the site will have more value for you.

But I definitely think the site (and the network) are worth joining. Especially if you can find a $60/year membership.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Staxxx.com

18. Staxxx.com (0)

Network
Newbie
78*
exotics4me (0) 02-09-22  08:17am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - The numbers say it’s a massive network. It’s owned by the same people as Puba.
- They list 37 different sites.
- Their stats say 1,797 videos with 1,904 photosets. Ask Mark Twain about stats
- Download speeds are very good (close to 90% of my max).
- Most of the videos have 480p, 720p and 1080p. (see bottom line, it’s hard to specify how many)
- You will find some top porn models on here.
Cons: - I don’t know if they advertise exclusive. I’m not going to say it’s not. I’m just going to say if this is exclusive it’s just a newer created version of a porn scene. Like cutting the blowjob out. I have seen some of this before.
- No dates, no way to know if it’s updating, no reason to stay another month to see if the numbers change. The bottom line should explain it better than I’m doing in these pros and cons.
- You have to send an email to cancel. Not a big deal but why not just make it automated?
Bottom Line: I was wanting to look into Puba. I reviewed it a few years ago. I know it’s always budget-friendly and they have a lot of models that I like. I was signing up for it. I’m one of the worst people for letting my mouse slide up the screen. The pointer was over the close tab. A pop-up showed up saying I could add Staxxx. It would be under $10 for both. That’s a good deal … maybe.

Staxxx advertises 37 different sites. Those mostly have 25-30 videos on each and 25-30 photo ets on each. I think the math catches up with them. They have a combined roughly 3,700 photosets and videos on 37 sites. That’s 100 combined photosets and videos per site. To balance that some. They do have a site called Bang a Teen, that for some reason causes me to spell Teen with a g, Bang a Teeng, that has 534 photosets and 460 videos. That’s nearly 1,000 of those 3,700. That leaves the other 36 sites with 2,700 combined photosets and videos.

I’m not trying to be overtly critical of the network. I’m trying to tell people what they’re going to get with the site. The Bang a Teen site, to me, looks like the old, licensed Euro porn that used to fill up sites. It's not bad. There’s a chance you’ve seen it. I even found a scene with a very young Eve Angel in an all-girl orgy. Just based on my knowledge of Eve. That was probably 2006-2007. The Euro porn was once great. I think it just depends on your feeling of I’ve already seen that scene.

The videos have limited download options at standard definition and the two high definition choices. There are some cute models. I keep wanting to say a saying I don’t like saying. You get what you paid for. They have one “site” called Compton Booty. I grew up near Compton, about 2 miles away. The site has 38 scenes. The female models are quite attractive black women. I don’t know this for sure. It just looks like some ripped the scenes off 5-6 similarly titled DVDs and called it a site. How can we fault them for that? They’re only charging $5 per site. You couldn’t buy a handful of bargain bin porn DVDs for that. Sites like this leave me frustrated. I know it’s not a great site. This is not really a network. The “sites” are more or less categories. I do believe porn like this has a place. The bargain bin. I don’t see a reason to be that critical of it either. This is one of those sites where the bang for your buck figures in.

They do have a coming soon section that shows 156 videos and 148 photosets coming soon. The bad part is, those say 2/9/22, which is now. If they are adding that much maybe per month. There are a lot worse deals in porn. They do have a relatively broad range of genres. There is no model list even though the models are tagged by their names. It is just not a site that’s going to make you feel like it’s anything more than a trunkful of bargain bin DVDs. You will find some scenes you may like. I can look at the previews and see a few that look good. I also can see that there is transsexual content on here as well. I feel like I’m doing a disservice if I don’t review it. I wasn’t for what I was getting with it. I doubt I will do anything more than a stream a few of the scenes.

If it helps any, I’ve seen much worse that cost much more. They do give you photo zips and downloadable videos. The photos are nice photosets. And those do have the Staxxx watermark on them. I would recommend it to those looking for a lot of porn for cheap. The pictures are probably the best part of it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Low Art Films

19. Low Art Films (0)

Pay
Newbie
88*
KayTBuffs (0) 02-09-22  06:30am
Rookie Badge  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: A studio that I remember joining the site of in 2011. It’s worth looking into.

A mostly lesbian site with some of the biggest names in scenes that most people don’t even know exist.

Good download options considering all of this was released in 2010-2012. All of the scenes have 160p up to 720p.

Getting the chance to see some models before their fame or rise. London Keyes stands out most. Her lesbian scene with Nika Noir is one of the best lesbian scenes I have seen.

There are some male/female scenes.

What you’re looking at most is this was the first steps to porn like we see on Pure Taboo, the lighting, the colors, they are changing moods with the colors. They need a Porn History class in college. If Art History qualifies as college credit, why not porn history?
Cons: It's a small site and it’s not going to update ever again. It only has 82 scenes, but I admit, I have downloaded 62 of them.

I wonder if other sites have ever looked into this style of filming. This site could even be confusing for people. Heavy on the glam, but there’s some BDSM in it.
Bottom Line: I didn’t list is a pro or con. This site, from what I remember, was going to feature mostly Asian women. It was going to be “interracial” with one of the women (lesbian scenes) being Asian. Times have changed, I don’t really know why this site stopped. Some of the names of models: Charmane Star, Yuri Luv, Sea J. Raw, Puma Swede who is one of the most attractive, athletically built models. Jayden James who I know was on top of the porn world at one time. Capri Anderson. Shyla Jennings. Capri Cavanni. London Keyes. There is even a male/female scene between Asa Akira and Mr. Marcus. Faye Reagan. Reagan Reese. The scene I remember the most is Alexis Amore and Nikki Rhodes with Mexican-inspired Día de los Muertos makeup. This was one of the sites that someone had a vision about. Maybe it didn’t catch on with the consumer. There is almost nothing to fault in these scenes. I do believe Fame Digital maybe bought it out.

The models are top of the shelf for that time period. The only real facts you need is there are 82 of these scenes that someone gave up on way too soon. I wouldn’t be surprised to know the scenes were busting the budget. The whole idea with these scenes goes into the lighting, the colors, it creates a mood in the viewer. They were already trying too hard at that point. This makes me think of what Bree Mills was producing 12 years ago. It blends so many niches.

There are a few solo scenes. Most of the scenes are lesbian. There are some male/female. You’re not expecting to see light water torture of Jayden Jaymes and Nick Manning during a hardcore scene. It’s here, though. There’s a lot of cosplay. There is bondage. And the best part, the lesbian scenes are as close as I think you can get to calling lesbian porn – hardcore. Rough rubbing and fingering. I had a membership recently to Kink and this looks like Kink meets glam. The scenes are very hardcore. I never expect that from a site with Art in the name, but it is Low Art. I believe the name even tells they were trying too hard. There’s a lot of use of oils on the bodies. The rooms they are in look like a mixture of a Soho Penthouse, a gothic dungeon, a million dollar mansion, a Japanese home and a rundown, dilapidated industrial building. I do think a site like this probably inspired some sites that we rate very highly these days. They were doing the creativity. There’s not a lot of stories in the scenes. Adding the quality of the models makes this a site someone like me will download 62 of 82 videos from. Even though I like solo porn. I don’t really like the solo scenes on this site. There’s clearly something going on in these scenes. The solo women should have been in the scenes with couples having sex and masturbating there.

The download quality is not bad. You can download up to 720p on all the scenes. I'm trying to recollect more about this site from my memory. The first 6 scenes have a title. The rest do not. Those were titled, “Janine and Jessica Dirty Desires”. That is Jessica Jaymes and Janine Lindemulder. It does look like the site was first focusing on them. It then shifted to more Asian models. There is even a very spirited solo scene of Sasha Grey in the old, industrial building setting. I consider this one of my best finds. It is also on Adult Time. That may be the advantage to joining Adult Time for a long period of time. I have had time to go through it more.

The last scene they made was one that worked the lights and colors, I thought, the best they had done. Maybe they didn’t get a big response to it and thought that’s the best they had and gave up. It’s Charmane Star and Yuri Luv. The lighting is soft, one background panel is a bright orange, heavy contrast there. Charmane and Yuri have a lot of face make-up on especially around the eyes. Charmane’s is a brighter red. Yuri’s is a muted blue. Someone was really trying to show the contrast. Very happy to have found this site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Silverstone DVD

20. Silverstone DVD (0)

Pay
Newbie
86*
KayTBuffs (0) 02-09-22  06:28am
Rookie Badge  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Some really great classic DVD scenes.

Nostalgia is replacing my interest in newer porn. So many of these models are ones I forgot about.

Very large site with 1,203 scenes.

It should appeal to collectors and those that started watching porn in the earlier years of internet porn.

You get Adult Time with it. There’s plenty more porn to look at.

Captures more of the spirit of porn that first interested me in porn.
Cons: The video quality is not good. It looks like these scenes are all from SD DVDs, 480p is the top option for downloads. I still think nostalgia and the action makes up for it.

It stopped updating in 2019 but was updating regularly and I don’t know why they didn’t improve the quality.
Bottom Line: Start it off with blame Vivid Classics for taking me back to a simpler time in porn’s history. Who needs gimmicks, domination and fetishes when you can have two very pretty, young, European women using a strap-on with each other? I was expecting the scenes to be in better quality. The Vivid Classics are and it on the same network. I can see the age of these scenes. There’s one with a young Silvia Saint. The ones I remembered are the Girl on Girl scenes. Some of the models look like maybe South American amateurs. Those are very good scenes. I can get by the video quality if the scene is good enough.

I do remember being a member of Silverstone DVD as a standalone site around 2010. I started out with Nubiles and DVD porn was very popular at the time. I would join the different studio sites instead of trying to punish myself with the large DVD sites. I do remember how much I liked these scenes. I thought the studio was long gone. I didn’t even realize it’s on Adult Time.

You get 1,203 scenes. The lesbian scenes are the best ones on the site. One of the first female pornstars I felt attraction to, which scared me – was Dee Baker. She has some scenes on this site including the one I remember well with Jeanie Rivers. This porn is as “dirty” as the porn we are seeing more of these days. Dee rims Jeanie, much more passionate lesbian scenes than the newer scenes have on most site. I don’t know what it says for me when I say I’m not a lesbian, but I really like passionate lesbian porn. It’s not all lesbian. There are straight scenes. Over 500 anal scenes. Most of the performers are well-known porn greats.

It's probably not going to blow you away, but if you like younger women, the smaller, slimmer women like were more common 10 years ago in porn, you will find some scenes on this site that you like. One DVD that I remember so well from this site, the Twins Collection that has the looks to be real twins. The two young, very pretty black twins. That is a niche I remember porn trying to get going about 10-15 years ago. Those DVDs are on here. Those show me something as well. If you like black women and South American women, there are a lot on this site. I know that guys have complained about not enough diversity in models. I nearly downloaded as much from this site as I did Vivid. I’ve still not hit that download limit, but these scenes, being 480p are not very big. Most are around 200 MB each.

Where does nostalgia fit in to today’s world? I like it. The people look like they are having fun. And having orgasms, the women are cute, the guys are masculine. I think everyone should at least watch a scene or two from it just to see the differences between new porn and the classic porn. Half of these scenes have anal, but none of those are hard to watch. That tells me it’s a difference in how the models act. Both male and female. This is equal porn. Most of these men stay out of the camera except the important, needed part. Their enjoyment and pleasure seem to come from how attractive the females are. That’s a lost concept in porn today. Not much reason to check the site anymore after this time, but plenty of reason to if you haven’t. It also shows what porn snobs we have become. We will watch low entertainment value porn in exchange for 2180 pixel videos.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Four Finger Club

21. Four Finger Club (0)

Pay
Newbie
83*
marcdc1 (0) 09-15-21  03:15pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Membership includes access to all New Sensations networks (27 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
- 4K videos available (no extra charge)
- There's PLOT. I like the action has an explanation. Nothing is stale they mix in plenty of plot devices so each scene feels fresh
- Mix of MILF and new talent.
- Great talent including LAUREN PHILLIPS. Mercedes Carrera, Lexi Belle, Riley Nixon, Brett Rossi, Cherie DeVille. I discovered plenty of new (to me) talent here to (I'm guessing many new stars start out with girl-girl)
- Decent search (some tags but too limited), search bar
- Approx 500 scenes (warning! includes BTS/interviews) - that's a big back catalog for a site like this
Cons: - Star rating system
- excellent production lighting/set/talent everything looks great
- Symbian and Hitachi are used so much they should be sponsors (LOL!)

CONS:
- No longer updating(?) The last update was 2/21
- When they were updating it was spotty 2X/month and then nothing for a while. Then 4 times in a month
- off theme. While they probably have 100+ "stretching" focused 4-finger banging shoots. There's a LOT (A LOT, A LOT) of other girl-gril action cross-posted here from other parts of the network.
- little diversity (unless you count hair color and trimming regiment). There are very few women of size (most are porn valley clones - the MILFs tend to be an exception). Hardly any ethnic diversity. (unlike the rest of the network were they seem to be putting in real effort
- No user forum/comments available
- No previews available either download it or stream it to see if it's what you're looking for
- Ads behind a paywall (seems like everyone is doing it these days)
Bottom Line: I like the more extreme stretching theme. I wish they had more consistency. Basically, before you're gonna go extreme like that you have to build a really hot scene so I think those shoots are some of the best girl-girl porn shoots.

So despite all fourfingerclub.com has going for it I can't go any higher with the score. It seems like they're giving up on updates and they mix in a ton of off-brand content.

I have to give it to them they do a lot of stuff right but to move into the A range they've got to give us fans more.

Buy or Pass. Because of the strength of the network, I think you have to give this a buy. But don't put it at the top of your list.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pure POV

22. Pure POV (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
Alybator (0) 08-31-21  08:38am
Rookie Badge  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Really pretty models shot in POV.

Long to longer scenes in the 30-45 minute range.

Despite being a small site (70 scenes) and the updates stopping over a decade ago, the content is either remastered or they were releasing 1080p videos over a decade ago. The technical quality doesn’t show the age of the site.

Videos are downloadable as are professional photo sets and also downloadable screenshots.

Good diversity in the scenes/action. The site doesn’t stick to one formula from scene to scene.
Cons: It’s a difficult con to list since I wouldn’t have known it if the dates on the scenes hadn’t told me this site hasn’t been updated in over 10 years.

Other than that and the small collection of 70 scenes, I am someone who likes POV and 70 scenes of high quality POV isn’t really a con to me, but believe it should be listed in cons.
Bottom Line: This site is one of those that makes me wonder what other sites have been doing for the last 15 years. The newest update on this site is nearly 13 years old, but the models are very pretty and the quality of the video only drops out on the oldest 20 scenes. It even only drops to 540p. The rest of the scenes have 720p and 1080p download options.

The lack of story is expected due to it being European. I’m still waiting on more of those European studios to discover the use of English subtitles. The POV filming on this site is very good. You get various locations, some cosplay, indoors, outdoors, and it looks like this site at one time was a pretty big deal. I do not know these models, but have read multiple PU members talk about the European models of the 2000s and I see what they mean. There’s hardly a dud in any of these models. The action is professional and maybe that could be not as good to some. There’s not a lot of variance or uniqueness other than the POV camera.

If I have any complaint about the content it’s that some of the scenes just seem too casual. One of the scenes has a woman doing anal and she looks like she’s just sitting back watching a television show. There are no scenes with more than two people in the scene and I usually do find that as a negative. I believe porn needs to look into the competitive aspect of having multiple women in one scene with one man. It just seems like when it’s one on one there’s not as much energy.

I do believe the site is at least worth looking into if you’re into POV and especially blonde models. There are multiple blonde models on this site that really stand out to me. Their names are generic enough that I don’t know if there’s anyway to look them up, like Sabrina, Ildiko and Eva.

There are 70 scenes. Those can be downloaded with no limits and there are downloadable photo sets as well as downloadable screenshots. I could see downloading 40-50 of the scenes they do have and being happy with that. I’m not going to score it as high as the quality deserves to be scored, just because there seems to be no way they’ll ever start updating this site again, but will score it high enough to at least nudge you to check it out if you get the chance. I’m pleasantly surprised with the content.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit We Fuck Black Girls

23. We Fuck Black Girls (0)

Pay
Newbie
84*
pinkerton (0) 07-03-21  07:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Good quality interracial hardcore content with hot ebony babes.
Regular updates.
Excellent site functionality (including mobile) makes it easy and quick to locate and watch scenes.
Scenes have linked categories such as anal, creampie, DP, etc.
Paged scene listing provides complete scene info and provides all functionality for each scene: stream and download the scene, view and download photos, watch scene trailer and BTS footage, link to model info page, link to other scenes featuring a selected linked category, all from the scene listing and without having to jump to a scene detail page.
Can add scene to favourites, rate and leave comments for each scene.
Model index can be sorted and filtered by name and rating and shows number of scenes for model.
Variety of download sizes including 4K, 1080p and 720p HD formats and 480p SD format.
Good download speeds.
Responsive customer service.
Includes DogFart network content.
Epoch biller means sign-up is safe and easy.
Cons: No detailed model info - model page only lists scenes.
4K downloads are charged per scene.
Live cams sidebar affects page loading performance.
Not a lot of variety of scene content.
Downloaded video file sizes are excessive for 1080p and 480p content.
Download links are listed as HD when they're really only 480p (or less) SD.
Download filenames aren't unique so there's a chance you might overwrite a previously downloaded scene.
Can't resume downloads from a previous session.
Bottom Line: We Fuck Black Girls has over 75 scenes of hardcore interracial sex featuring US ebony babes getting fucked, with content dating back to August 2014 and updating monthly.

-Scenes range from 30 to 40 minutes long with most at around 30 minutes, featuring a basic intro storyline with one or more white guys and an ebony girl. The variety of themes range from tradesmen at the girl's home, the girl attracting her hunky neighbour, girl throwing a small birthday party, a home visit from a masseur, and so on, but scenes feature one or more white guys fucking the ebony babe hard in various positions before cumming on her or inside her. Whilst the action isn't exactly rough, the girl is usually getting a good pounding courtesy of some well-hung studs, and indeed in one scene, she's taking three cocks between her ass and pussy. If your preference is for more sensual action, you might wanna look elsewhere, otherwise you'll be very happy with the content here.

-There are many anal scenes and where there's more than one guy, there'll usually be DP. Many scenes also feature creampie otherwise most endings involve cum in mouth, face or on ass or body or tits. Generally the girls are very attractive with a range of body types, though mostly young and hot.

-Scenes are good production quality with decent camera angles, though at 10Mbps encoding for the 1080p content, download file sizes are 25% larger than they need to be. The download options for HD MED and HD SMALL are not HD at all but are 688x348 at 1500Kbps and 800Kbps bitrates; HD BIG downloads are 1280x720 at a fairly reasonable 43500Kbps bitrate. I'd be wary of the 4K download options for the older content dating back to 2014 as it's possibly it's merely upscaled 1080p content.

-The web site is very functional and quite responsive on both normal and mobile sites. The design of the scene listing/updates page is a departure from the usual convention of lots of scene thumbnails (each with minimum scene info) per page, requiring you to click the thumbnail or scene title to view the scene on a separate scene detail page. Instead this site shows all the scene info with a large scene preview image per scene, with the ability to stream and download the scene, all from the scene listing page, which arguably means less mouse-clicks and waiting for pages to load when you're browsing the content. The trade-off is that there are only 5 scenes per page.
Personally I prefer this design over the usual, as I tend to flick through every page of site updates from start to end, and having a large scene photo plus being able to stream the scene trailer (or the whole scene) at various resolutions is much quicker than otherwise. I also very much like that the list of scene names/models is presented as a drop down list from which you can jump to a selected scene. You can also jump to a specific page number in the scene updates listings by selecting the desired page number from a drop-down list.
You can also filter scenes by one or more categories but this works across the network rather than just this site.
Scenes can be listed by date order or rating order.

-Each scene listing provides complete scene info and provides lots of functionality: add to favourites, stream in-place or in a new window, download scene, stream trailer, watch behind the scenes video, view and download photos, link to other scenes sharing linked categories, link to model info page, rate scene and leave comments - all whilst browsing the scene listing and without having to jump to a scene detail page.
Scene info includes model name/title, release date, rating, duration, complete scene cast, applicable (and linked) categories and scene description/storyline.

-Photosets are presented as a gallery or can be downloaded as a ZIP file. The gallery presents pics as a paged list of thumbnails, clicking on one zooms to full page size, from which you can navigate back and forth, open the pic in a new in a new window or - rather amusingly - send the pic to Twitter!
The photos are 3000x2000 resolution.

-Login sessions last for as long as the browser window is open - if you're downloading scenes and you close your browser (but leave your DL manager open) it's very likely your current and pending downloads will fail. Because a unique session id is part of the site URL, you can't close your browser and resume downloads in a later new login session as the site URL will have changed and the download URL will be invalid, so make sure you finish downloading before closing your browser window/tab that's open on this site.

-This is a very good interracial porn site, with the good site design and quality of the content and the inclusion of other IR content from Dogfart network, We Fuck Black Girls is well worth joining, esp. with the PU discount. Highly recommended.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit She Is Nerdy

24. She Is Nerdy (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
LKLK (0) 06-19-21  05:45am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Site is part of the Dirty Flix network.
If you join through the She Is Nerdy site, you will pay $30/month, or $120/year.
But if you join through the Dirty Flix site directly, you can normally find discounted prices of $15/month or $60/year. I joined through Dirty Flix for $60/year. Joining through She Is Nerdy and/or Dirty Flix gives you access to the same sites.
-The videos have your choice for downloading of low, medium and high definition. And since November 2016 they added 4K definition for downloading.
But for online streaming, they stream at 240p, 720p, or 1080p. There is no 4K option for streaming, even on the newest videos.
-There is an accompanying screen shot set for each video. The zip file comes in only one definition. The screen shot sets vary between 40 to about 80 screen shots. These are screen shots, not photos.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. Unusual. I looked all over for a pre-checked cross-sale, but finally realized there wasn't any.
Cons: -On the public page, it tells you you have 5 video previews, to see what the quality of a video looks like. Except, when you click on a video preview link, instead of watching a video preview, it brings up the join page, where the prices shown are expensive: $30/month, or $120/year.
Two cons:
the prices shown are expensive.
instead of viewing a sample preview, you get the join page. Where's the sample preview? You have to join the site to see the video. Ha-ha. Joke is on you.
-The login and member pages are non-secure. Your browser will probably have a popup notice stating "This conection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
-There are no video previews in the members area. If you want to know what the video is about, you can look at the thumbnail screen shots, or you can read the generic text description which tells you a model will get fucked by a stunt cock.
Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED):
There is minimal plot to most of these videos: You have a cute girl who starts off wearing glasses (which is supposed to show she is a nerdy girl), you've got a young stunt cock who's got sex on his brain (these are Russians, remember), they touch, they kiss, then it's off to teen hardcore heaven.
-Irregular update rate. From 2 to 4 new videos per month. But if you count the accompanying screenshot sets, that means 4 to 8 new items per month.
-Verotel is the default payment processor that I used. Not as widely known as CCBill or Epoch, but a trusted name in high-risk payment processing (the classification for porn pay sites).
-There are ads on every member page, but that's standard to most porn sites.


BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Movies: 121
Photosets: 121
Models: around 121
Site launched in 2014
Videos run about 20 to 30 minutes

The photosets are screenshot sets, not photosets, since the contents of a set are screen shots. Screen shots are lower quality than photos. The definition is usually less. The focus is not as good, the composition of the image is normally less artistic.

Site theme: nerdy girls having sex.
What makes a girl nerdy? She is wearing glasses. That's all it takes. And sometimes the girls aren't even wearing glasses. You have to take the site's idea that any girl can be nerdy. And most of the girls at the site are cute teens (or early twenties) who are wet inside and ready to milk your cock with their mouth and pussy and even their ass.
Let me emphasize how cute and hot these teens are.
You would think the sex would get repetitous and boring very fast. But if you're into attractive teen girls like I am, the videos are more than watchable, they can be arousing.
The site (and most of the network) does a fine job selecting cute teen models who put on a show for you.
These girls are almost all featured at competing teen hardcore sites, like Nubiles.net, Nubiles Porn, Team Skeet, Teen Mega World, Twistys, etc. Some of them can even appear at MetArt.

The plot or setup to the sex is usually minimal. The screenshot sets are usually not worth collecting, even if the models are attractive, because the quality of the screenshot is not good or just OK. But the videos are definitely worth collecting. The models are cute, the images are clear and crisp, the video does a fine to excellent job capturing how attractive these young girls are. The models don't wear a lot of makeup, the sets are not expensive but not overly cheap, the video is like a slice of life of what you'd like to see (and do) if you were a teen or early twenties person again with one of these lovely young women. This isn't glamcore or heartcore, but it's a closer to slice of life of what you wish you had been exposed to as a young man.

Although many of the model and stunt cocks are Russian or from that region, there are some from America. So some videos do have English dialogue. But dialogue, or its lack, is a minor element in the videos. Although I enjoy plot-driven porn, especially when it's done well, any plot is a minor factor in these videos. You've got a nubile girl and a guy that wants to get his rocks off. It's not rough, crude, or over the top sex. Instead, it's two young people enjoying each other without guilt or any other baggage. Occasionally there is a touch of romance, if you want to consider kissing and holding hands romance before the hardcore sex. But the site focuses on the hardcore sex.

The site and network has a simple structure that is easy to navigate. There is a search engine, if you want to check the video for a title you've seen. There are hot links for all the model's content at the network, once you click on her name. The models themselves, as I've stated, are young white teen- or early-twenties- girls who are mainly attractive. Little effort is put into presenting them attractively, but they are naturally young and attractive to begin with: they don't need much make-up, expensive sets, glamourous costumes, or extensive lighting.

I'm giving the site a score of 90. The site focuses on teen girls who are into sex. The videos are mainly bread-and-butter hardcore sex, but I enjoy them.
If hardcore teen sex is not your niche, you would score the site lower, and would probably be bored with it. I regard the simple plots, or lack of them, as a positive, because most porn starlets are poor actors. There's no problem with a stupid plot, because there's almost no plot in these videos. You have a girl and a guy, they meet or are together, and they have sex.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit SexMex.xxx

25. SexMex.xxx (0)

Pay
Newbie
78*
pinkerton (0) 06-15-21  09:16am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Over 1000 scenes of latina hardcore sex with a variety of sexy chicanas.
+Functional, responsive, easy to use site with good search of scene titles and models.
+Paged scenes listing and model listings can be sorted by date, rating and name/title - model listing can be filtered alphabetically.
+Scene listing shows most info about the scene with title, model, release date and scene description all there.
+Tags to select scenes by categories such as anal, DP, creampie and so on.
+Scenes can be rated, commented on and added to favourites, as well as listing other scenes that match a clicked-on tag.
+Advertising isn't intrusive but is on a separate page listing many porn deals.
+Good download speeds and works with download managers (but see cons).
+Variety of download file sizes with 4K (newest scenes), 1080p, 720p and 480p with small download file sizes.
+Download photos as ZIP file with sizes of 1600, 1280 and 1024 on long side.
+Good service from Centrobill biller, easy cancellation.
Cons: -Few images in photosests, not all scenes have photosets, some can't be downloaded as ZIP files.
-Tag/category scene selection limited to one tag.
-Some duplicate content.
-Some content has vanished.
-Many 1080p downloads are corrupt and unplayable.
-Scene comments don't appear immediately - after a week there's still no sign of any comments I posted.
-Missing tags in some scenes, others have just one tag such as "latina porn", also some tags seem a bit random - "shaped legs" anyone?
-Missing parts of a series of scenes in some cases: end of scene says "to be cont'd" but there's no part 2 scene.
-Video purists will consider encoding of DL content too low at 16Mbps for 4K, 4Kbps for 1080p and 2500Kbps for 720p.
-Some content from 2014 and before recycled from other sites, not latina porn.
-Some older content is not HD.
-Sudden disappearance (2 days into membership) of the ability to download scenes - no notice or explanation.
-Non-existent site support.
Bottom Line: -The site name suggests content featuring Mexican performers, all the dialog is in Spanish with English subtitles.
-At time of review there are 1148 scenes, averaging a duration of 20 mins, dating back to May 2005, featuring 189 models I've never come across before - okay, there are a couple of names/faces I recognised, but mostly they're new to this long-time porn user and many have a large number of scenes.

-Site layout is clean, responsive and very functional, with paged thumbnail scene listings showing nearly all scene info. Clicking into the scene detail allows you to stream the scene, rate it, add it to your favourites and leave comments. Clicking the model name leads to the model's page which also lists her scenes. There are also various tags/categories applicable to the scene which link to other scenes. Finally, the page lists up to 9 other scenes you might like based on this scene.

-Many scene storylines are based on the theme of a young lady having sex with an older relative/step-family-member or an older lady having sex with one or more young relatives or friends of their son, otherwise there are various basic storylines and porn castings/initiations featuring 1-on-1, threesome etc. The variety of models - young, older, slim, full-figured - all seem to enjoy the sex, even when being pounded by one or more young guys. Many scenes feature multiple cocks on one lady, often DPing her and often ending with them cumming in her pussy and/or ass from the 240+ creampie scenes. There are a few lesbian scenes with some morphing into a cock-sharing threesome. Many of the models have tattoos and there are some pretty obvious boob jobs, so if you're turned off by those, that'll rule out quite a bit of content for you. Otherwise, many of the ladies are voluptuous and generally have great asses, so it's not surprising many of the guys cum inside them after fucking them doggy style!

-A few recent scenes feature an interactive element where you control the storyline.

-There are 10 series that encompass a tiny fraction of the content, so seems pointless.

-Downloaded scenes are encoded at around half the minimum bitrate needed for good quality and whilst quality isn't poor, if you like your HD porn to be crisp and detailed, you might be disappointed. Personally, I didn't notice any poor video quality and appreciate the much smaller download file sizes. Downloaded video bitrates are: 4k 16Mbps, 1080p 4Mbps, 720p 2500Kbps and 3000Kbps for the 854x480 content (excessive considering the 720p bitrate). A few very latest 1080p downloads are encoded at 20+ Mbps though.

-So far, so positive, but beware the following gripes:
--A full-screen site logo always appears as a transition from one part of a scene to another, rather than just at the start of and end of the scene - it's an annoying feature of the production which is otherwise good with great camera angles, but when the guy apparently cumming inside the girl is interrupted by the site logo cutting in and then out to a view of his cock oozing cum pressed against her ass or pussy, it's an obvious attempt at faking it. This frequent intrusion of the site logo in most scenes is just annoying in otherwise well-produced scenes.
--Many scenes are incomplete, for example, a scene will refer to part 2 but there's no part 2 anywhere on the site.
--The much older content is recycled from other sites, as evidenced by the watermark, it looks like vintage Euro porn and features more condom use.
--Some scenes are missing lots of tags or have just one tag, Porn In Spanish, for example.
--Some scenes have no video or photosets - where's the point?
--A significant number of the 1080p downloads don't work/are corrupted.
--Scene comments don't appear immediately, so must be moderated, no doubt any less than positive comments won't be allowed. Having said that, positive comments I left for some scenes a week ago still haven't appeared.
--Scene download links disappeared two days into my membership and my messages to site support have been ignored. There was no communication about this, I'm guessing it's because I downloaded a lot of content in a relatively short time. The support page does say you can't use download managers but I hadn't seen that before I started using the site. Also VPNs are not allowed, but you could work around that if your VPN service can be setup to always use the same IP address to connect and access this site.
My DL mgr does one file at a time, so in theory, if you download a lot in a short time using your browser's built-in downloader, you may still fall foul of the no DL manager rule. You've been warned.

-Despite the gripes, I still recommend this site, especially with the PU discount, as much of the content is hot and the ladies, especially the older ones, seem more than a match for the bunch of well-hung young studs in their scenes. If you don't DL too much per day, you'll hopefully avoid the removal of the download links from your membership.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 297 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. None

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.2 seconds.