Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A blowjob POV site that still updates!
Can be accessed with a Nookies subscription
Good download quality and it’s not limited
Scenes are long for the blowjob niche
Pretty models with dirty talk
Easy site and network to use
Cons:
No pictures or 4K downloads
It is updating, but there does not seem to be a set schedule
Videos are split into parts
Bottom Line:
I believe I have talked about blowjobs being a favorite niche of mine. Being an older man, blowjobs weren’t something young ladies were offering up like they do these days. That is where POV bkowjob porn comes in and is arguably my favorite niche of porn. This site is a part of the Nookies network. It is a good network, very niche heavy with a big focus on handjobs and blowjobs.
POV Tease is not just a POV blowjob site, it incorporates tease and a fun playfulness you don’t get in most porn. The models are young and almost always beautiful. They are good at presenting the POV Blowjob style. I feel like I am too old to give Virtual Reality a try and see POV porn as the next best thing, the best for me. The models talk dirty, tease, touch and make the viewer feel like this is what we would experience.
Most of the scenes I have downloaded are high definition, but not 4K. I am surprised there are no pictures as it seems like that would be a natural feature from the POV perspective. The scenes offer little else beyond fulfilling my lifelong fantasy, but in this case – that is enough.
The cons include the lack of photos and 4K downloads. Neither are dealbreakers, but both could improve the user experience. The site and network definitely update, but there is no set schedule or way to know when those updates are coming. The real questionable con is why the videos are split up. These are not older videos and are HD quality, it just seems a little strange to split them up.
Nookies as a network adds value. I have to think anyone joining any of these sites has to have a strong fetish for the content and if so, you are likely going to be very happy with the results. The videos on Tease POV are also longer than most blowjob videos. Some are close to the 20 minute mark. The POV perspective makes this site fairly unique, I only know of four blowjob sites filmed from the POV perspective.
Something that stands out to me is the models are all quite capable of talking dirty and making eye contact with the camera while giving the blowjob. I do believe that makes the content more believable and realistic. None of the cons are enough to outweigh a nearly 50 year fetish of mine. The basics add up much higher than the negatives. Pretty, young women talking dirty with their face right in the camera as if the camera is my lap. I have learned when looking for porn that fits my preferred niches, there really isn’t much that can hurt the content. This one works perfectly for me even if the network itself has some shortcomings.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
– Formerly Tug Pass, a handjob focused network, but offers more than just handjobs.
– Unlimited video downloads and most have 720p and 1080p
– Download speeds are good (80% my max).
– Includes access to Handjob Hub
– 15+ sites are advertised as part of the Nookies network.
– Quantity in a relatively rare niche is the biggest pro.
Cons:
– Many years of joining Tug Pass and have heard quite a few negative comments about the attractiveness of their models. Rebranding doesn't change that.
– No 4K for the resolution lovers
– If you were going to judge the entire network on technical quality, it would be average or at best, slightly above average.
Bottom Line:
I remember reviewing Tug Pass a long time ago and within minutes, someone replied and commented on the models being old and unattractive. Old, I don't think, can really be subjective, but attractiveness is. I am not saying those models from the older scenes were top tier in looks, but this is a handjob site, not a glam site.
I can tell you the models started getting younger and more attractive, but we get to see the pro/con at work. Those older, less attractive models, really seemed to enjoy playing with dicks. Sure, you can make the joke that they don't get many in real life, but can't deny their performances are great. The newer, younger models do sometimes seem more bored than anything and I think that's expected with handjob porn.
Once beyond that, you have a network here, Nookies, that offers one of the biggest handjob collections you will ever find. Their videos and pictures sets are both over 3,000. Not all are handjob only, there are scenes of nearly all male/female niches.
I believe having more than just handjob scenes has helped the network. Having unlimited downloads is a major pro, too. The video quality is good enough. That is my way of saying, unless you're wanting the highest video quality possible, you will be happy with these videos. I still am mostly downloading 720p. I won't give the long explanation, but the short one says I have some vision damage and really can't see a huge difference between 720p and 1080p and see even less with 4K. I do believe video resolution preference has a lot to do with how long you've been viewing online porn. HD was such a major step up from SD. It makes HD more than good enough for me.
The handjob genre is covered well. Several of the models, especially in older scenes, were and maybe still are experts in milking and edging.
Navigation is good, but could be better. I've been using online porn long enough that I rarely need navigation or tags to lead me to what I'm looking for.
Besides the unlimited videos, you can also download unlimited photo zips and there's the added “bonus” of being able to access Handjob Hub Premium.
Handjob Hub Premium is owned by Nookies and is a handjob tube site. A lot of the content on Handjob Hub Premium is from Nookies, minus the cumshots, yeah, not kidding. They do have some scenes not from Nookies so there's a little bonus to the content. It's just not as big of a deal as it is advertised as.
The Nookies scenes do not cut out the cumshots.
I am scoring this network higher than I expected when I joined it. Some of the reasons include: The newer scenes are trying to add new elements even to the handjob scenes. They seem to be aiming for various niches like voyeurism and teasing. Personally, I would rather see a site or network, trying something different and unique, than adding 4K videos. The older scenes relied on the woman taking on a nearly dominant role, while the newer scenes show the male, while physically in the submissive role, turning it into more of a neutral role where the woman is getting as much out of the physical stimulation as the guy is, without the woman needing the dom role. I like it. It's a real evolution in human sexuality. It's nice to see a woman enjoying herself making the guy cum, not because she's feeling superior.
Maybe it's the key to porn’s future success even? So many females seem to struggle with anything presenting themselves as dominant. These newer scenes are showing a compromise, the middle ground, where the male and female are more focused on being playful and enjoying their sexuality, instead of worrying about who is dom and who is sub.
A good network that's somehow, in 2024, improving themselves instead of rehashing their past success.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It’s a network dedicated to handjobs and blowjobs
Huge with nearly 3,000 videos
Downloads are unlimited
It is 100% exclusive
Over 1,000 models
Female models have improved greatly
Cons:
This is very clearly at least one old network combined with newer content and you can tell by the quality
I have noticed some of the older scenes have the cumshot edited out
The models in older scenes weren’t much to look at
Bottom Line:
I didn’t research this network before joining. I’m not even for sure researching it would have helped or would have changed my interest in joining it. There are scenes from a site I was a member of awhile back called Club Tug and I think the majority of the older scenes are from a network that has closed down. I’m guessing Nookies is the new name, rebrand,
The good news is, the newer scenes have much more attractive women in them than the older scenes. You also can download the newer videos in HD quality. While the focus is on blowjobs and handjobs there are hardcore sex scenes on the network as well.
The older scenes are not only lower video quality, but often have women in the scenes, that I find unattractive. Kind of like a B-list of porn stars.
Nookies at least shows progress. Besides the models being more attractive, the scenes and video quality are much better and the women are younger, which I think fits this style of porn.
I can say that I have only beein watching and downloading the scenes released within the last year. Maybe it is just me, but when a porn scene features a female, her hand and a penis, the attractiveness of the woman has to be pretty high.
If you’re curious or want to do the research, I didn’t do until after joining the site, go to the TBP page and look at the included sites. A lot of those sites have been around for awhile and were once part of another network.
The main reason I’m positive about this network is the new content is very good. I’m guessing they have new producers and it really shows in the quality of the scenes. It is mostly still just blowjobs and handjobs and I seriously doubt there is much you can do to improve this small niche. I do believe picking more attractive women is a step in the right direction and it really works in their newer scenes.
It’s a good site as long as you understand it is a reboot of a previous site. There is plenty of newer content that is at least worth looking into for a month, but I don’t think there is any long term interest. Lesson of the review, be sure and research a “new” site that has around 3,000 scenes
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ This should be called Guys Just Wanna Have Fun!
+ Over 1,000 scenes of young and pretty women giving handjobs and teasing for more
+ Some of the newer videos have 4K downloads and most have at least HD downloads
+ Each scene comes with a downloadable picture set
+ A lot of real, authentic, genuine responses from the females
+ Includes the small network Finishes The Job
Cons:
- Kind of makes it clear why guys get tired of masturbating. There really isn’t much you can do with the penis.
- Which is the second con, there’s so much teasing from these young ladies. It’s only a con because we’re paying for action
- The other two sites, Mr POV and the Dick Suckers are not as good even though many of the scenes overlap with Mano Job scenes
Bottom Line:
This should be a fun network if nothing else. It’s mostly young and very pretty women playing with penises. It’s not often the penis gets to take center stage, but does on this site and maybe shows why the penis struggles with the spotlight. There really is only so much a penis can do! It reminds me of why some of us women prefer guys that are growers not show-ers. Watching it grow is part of the fun and arousal.
The ladies on this site do a pretty good job of keeping the penis out of their mouth and or other holes, but there are times, I would have liked to see them do more than play with the penis. I think that’s the biggest con of the site. I can see how and why men would like this type of content. I would guess the guy can picture himself being the guy in the scene. It is why, I assume, the scenes are mostly filmed in POV.
The first thing that crossed my mind was why do we not have lesbian POV where one lesbian plays with the other in closeup detail? These scenes look so fun for the guys and surprise, some of the women seem to be at least somewhat new and inexperienced at playing with the penis. You get real reactions including cute grins when the woman feels the penis getting harder and you see the innocence of the woman quickly turn into horniness. I get the purpose of tease porn, but don’t agree with it. This site and its other two sites are already mixing scenes by having what was clearly a handjob scene turn into a scene for their Dick Suckers site. Thinking while watching porn should be against the law. It is my biggest problem while watching porn. I am, possibly, almost convinced the scenes from this network’s sites are really just edited down from a full scene. For example, you get the handjob part on Manojob. You then have the oral sex on Dick Suckers and finally, Mr. POV is full-out hardcore sex.
I’m not saying this is true. It is just the feeling I get when watching the different scenes from their different sites. It also made me think and wonder if maybe much more happens than makes its way to the porn scene? Is there a female who is great at handjobs, but not as good at oral sex?
The scenes are arousing and fun. From the female viewing perspective, I see myself taking the woman’s place and being as surprised as she is by how aroused the man becomes.
It's a good network as a whole and recommended especially for those who like some tease with their porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Impressive handjob, tease and blowjob site.
Weekly update
575 scenes and the women are all above average in looks.
Every scene has 4K download option and 1080p.
Downloads are unlimited and included in membership.
Surprising to me, the newer scenes are better than the older scenes.
Cons:
Seems to be using the same guys for most scenes. That becomes boring for me.
Older scenes are very short and more formulaic.
Bottom Line:
Gay male sites have pushed me away. I decided to try this straight handjob site featuring some really pretty young women. Handjobs can be boring and repetitive. Just like solo male can be. You start realizing there’s just not a lot to do with the male body.
It's different for me to see the newer scenes improving in comparison to the older scenes. Most sites I have joined are the opposite of that. Most sites look like they start out strong, get bored and just start making the same scene over and over. This site has added some depth to the handjobs over the years. You get some edging, some frenulum play, very intense tongue teasing, it’s really good and sexy. I don’t know most of these models. The bios of the models lead me to believe they are mostly pro models, but I haven’t seen them before. Their names even look like pro models. Maybe they are, but at least they are attractive. The last straight handjob site I joined had a lot of average or below looking women. These women are a step or two up. The videos include some interview and talking before the handjob starts. Most of the models seem to have a set script they are building from.
The older scenes were mostly under 15 minutes. The newer scenes are over 20 and many are over 30 minutes. They have added some depth to the scenes. That, if nothing else, makes it seem like these women really enjoy giving a handjob. I do believe, with my limited knowledge, of the genre, that is very important.
I was shocked to see that every scene has HD and 4K downloads and there over 500 scenes. It’s not a brand-new site. Looks like it started in 2015. They have a weekly update every Friday. They also include photos and zip downloads.
The real attraction is those newer scenes that feature edging. I don’t think there’s many things in porn more exciting for a female than seeing the guy struggle through holding his orgasms only to finally get to release. That’s one of my favorite parts of porn. I could get by with cumshot compilations. The cumshots on Strokies are very good too. That leads to the negative. Even with the additions of edging and teasing, it's still just a handjob site. There are a lot of scenes where they female will also masturbate, but they could do so much more with that. I have to turn to tube sites to find mutual masturbation. Which is a very popular niche, but no one except amateurs seem to be doing it. Strokies comes the closest on mutual masturbation. They will have the female straddle the guy’s leg and hip area with her legs spread open and touching herself while she masturbates the guy with her other hand. Scenes like that would move the site up to my favorite if they did that more often. That is a very good niche to me.
I did mention in the cons there’s not a lot of different guys and that’s based just on the penis I can see. I feel like I know the guy at this point. I would recognize your dick from a crowd of dicks! That maybe hurts the site a little. I have heard of the term stunt cock before. That’s in hardcore sex where there are 8-10 positions per scene. There’s not much variation on a handjob site. The same penis right there in the camera view in every scene. Maybe dress it up in a little suit? I know that there are other women out there that feel the same way. You watch enough of these scenes and you will have seen this guy’s penis more than your boyfriend’s. Sorry about the joking around. There’s just not a lot to talk about in handjob porn. It's a very good site. I haven’t ever found that much attraction to handjob porn even though it seems like I should. I will come back to this one. It would be a good site to try out if you’re curious about handjob porn. It has enough variations to keep it from being strict handjob porn.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- over 350 scenes
- remastering back catalog
- great customer service. Any issue I've ever had has been fixed promptly and politely by the owner ("Billy"). He interacts with the forms as well and seems to be honest and straightforward.
- New girls and old favorites are shot. Fans can request who'd they'd like to see. I requested Alex Coal and she was posted about 2 months later. (maybe a coincidence?)
- Content is mostly 1920X1080 7.5 Mbps. The new stuff is in 4K (I'm still not on a 4K monitor so I didn't run the specs on it).
- Also get access to thedicksuckers.com and mrpov.com. Some cross-promotion. I caught some Ameature Allure stuff mixed in. But there isn't much of it.
- comment section with an active community
- playlist available along with favorite function for easy organization (also a star system for voting)
- Clean easy search with tags and a search bar
- new scenes pretty much each week
Cons:
PROS Cont:
- Top-of-the-line talent. I'd have a hard time picking favorites but some just a few standouts: Lauren Philips, Alex Coal, Ari Alexander, Cherie DeVille, Kimberly Kane, Larkin Love (she's hard to find outside of her own site!)
- BTS interview. I normally skip it but when I do look at it, it's good. Billy is a good interviewer and sometimes the girls get wild. Wish I could remember who it was but she was getting fucked and being interviewed at the same time. LOL
CONS:
- two-factor authorization (you sometimes need to use a 4 digit code they email to you to log in. I'd say I hit that maybe 1 out of every 10 times I log in)
- rotating content. They pull some videos and re-post them I guess this is aimed at the pirates?
Bottom Line:
It's rare that I keep a long-term membership to a site - but this one has earned its place. I don't think there's any other site doing what manojobs does. It's a niche but they fill it well. For me, I love dirty talk and this site excels at it like no other. While there's a lot of fast-forwarding in any porn shoot. I know I can go to the last 4 minutes of these shoots and find a hot girl talking crazy and taking a facial (normally a few more minutes of talk as cum oozes off her). I find it hot as hell. To me, they set out to accomplish what they're aiming for. This site does not have penetrative content (normally), so watch the previews and make sure they have what you're looking for.
Ok with all that why not the 100? I guess if I were knit-picking I'd say that a site that's been around this long should keep more of its catalog up. I think it's still a good site - but you asked. Other than that it would be nice if they remastered the back stuff faster. But all in all no real complants. If you are looking for a JOE/JOI site I think this is the top of the line.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
A welcome change to the formulaic world of massage porn even if the site is dead.
There are 314 scenes each with a downloadable video.
Very little intercourse, but more than a handjob/blowjob. It’s a middle ground of what massage porn usually gives us.
Simple to use site.
Very good video quality, considering the site hasn’t updated in years, makes it an easy site to skip, but you shouldn’t.
Includes photo sets with 100+ pictures and those are downloadable.
Most male and female models are attractive.
Cons:
I’m going to list the no longer updating as a con, but it’s a large site for what looks like a non-standard niche in the massage genre.
There could be more navigation options and tags.
Bottom Line:
The most common massage sites appeal to me. I like the use of oils, the massaging, the hand movements and what I see as erotic foreplay. The problem I have found with most massage sites is that the massages are usually just lead-ins for a handjob/blowjob scene or a standard hardcore scene. I believe it’s one of the embedded into, ingrained if you will, failures of porn over the last 5-10 years. That’s why I appreciate this site and hate that it has stopped updating.
The scenes start off like any massage scene. The masseuse is almost always the female except in a few of the scenes. There are some scenes with more than a masseuse and a customer, working in the angle of “she’s training” to add a second female. The massage doesn’t jump from first touch leads to sex. Some of the scenes have nearly half of the scene focused on the massage. There’s an added playfulness in the scenes with more than one female. As the male customer -- lying face down -- is unaware of the two female masseuses touching each other and taking their clothes off. Where the site excels is only a few of the scenes turn into hardcore sex. Most of the scenes instead of the female masseuse giving the male a handjob or blowjob, shows the masseuse climbing on top of the man in a 69. That is not something I am used to seeing in massage scenes. It, to me, adds a touch of eroticism. If you have problems with fantasizing, I think these scenes help with that. They’re not having noisy sex which usually ruins massage scenes for me. Maybe the 69 is the great mystery solver to stop the overacting and excessive chatter from the models? Both the male and female have their mouths either full or their tongues active. I really like this content and would like to see more of this style of massage porn.
There are 315 scenes so all is not lost. Of those 315 scenes, each has a downloadable video and downloadable photo set. All 315 videos have 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads, even the oldest ones.
With the site’s easy to use navigation, though I will complain that there needs to be better tagging, the site is still one of those that is easy to look over due to it not updating. The attractiveness and decent acting ability of the models make the scenes even more enjoyable. These scenes do work in a little story. It usually happens within the first few minutes of the scenes and has to do with the male customer calling someone, talking about how stressed out they are and how much the massage is needed. It’s not anything too deep, but it is enough. I definitely recommend it for those who want to see a massage scene that is more sexual than a handjob (usually CFNM when in massage), but doesn’t go all the way to hardcore.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Newer site on the Tug Pass network and in my opinion, the best site in the network.
Pretty models (most)
Scenes give full view of the nude female model while she pleasures a dick through a milking table.
Updates once per month (very important to the review).
65 scenes, all available to download in 1080p and unlimited downloads.
Photographs with each scene are downloadable and often show more than the videos do. Possibly because of different angles?
Cons:
It’s a small site and only is updating once per month.
It’s a narrow niche, every scene is nearly exact in execution.
Some unattractive models including what they list as GILFs
Bottom Line:
I was going to review the network Tug Pass as a whole, but believe this site is more important. This will cover both the network and this site Mylked. Mylked is clearly a newer site on the network. It only lists one update per month. The older sites say they are updating weekly (recycling). The sites you should look into if you are interested in joining this network are: Mylked and Shady Spa, those from the best I can tell, are the only ones definitely updating with new content. Mylked has at least some positives going for it. The female in the scene is laying under a table. She is fully nude, sometimes she is masturbating and most of these models are at worst, cute. Every scene is the same. The female model is laying under the table while a dick is sticking through a hole in the table. The female rubs the dick, she sucks it, she masturbates herself while doing it. It’s similar to a gloryhole scene except the model is laying down instead of on her knees.
The 65 scenes can all be downloaded in 1080p which is another sign this is a newer site on the network and possibly damages the view of several of the other sites on the network where 480p and 720p are the highest quality downloads. All scenes on all the sites in the network only have one download option. The scenes even on Mylked are very short with less than 10 minutes being common.
I felt this site earned a review with the attractiveness of the models compared to the other sites in the network. These may be pro models even. Jessica Marie, Freya Von Doom, Honey Hayes and Reina Ryder are the 4 newest models. I don’t recognize them or their names, but they are attractive (pretty or cute), they have nice bodies that they show off while pleasuring the dick sticking through the table.
In comparison to the other sites on the network, these models are much more attractive. I rarely go into attractiveness in reviews unless just saying pretty models. I feel like a lot of the models on this network would be turn offs for viewers. I can’t say I have experienced that on a network before, not on this scale.
The pictures on Mylked are also much better than on the other sites on this network. There are around 100 photos in each set and while it does look like they are screen captures, they show different angles than the video shows. I said this in a previous review of another site on this network, I don’t know if this is a negative or positive. It’s a site I joined to watch dicks being teased and pleasured. I ended up finding my favorite site of the network, Mylked, shows more of the female and I’m not a lesbian. There has to be a bigger picture at work here. The attractiveness of the models on Mylked make the scenes more enjoyable and there’s irony in that. This is the one site on their network the male can’t see the pretty woman pleasuring him. The other sites have the “average at best” female models right in the men’s view. This site, as much as I liked it -- possibly because of how much I disliked the overall network, is still repetitive and small. I do believe if you check out Mylked, I don’t know how much the preview shows of the models and also Shady Spa, if you think you would like either or both of those sites this network is worth joining for the discounted price. I believe if you don’t think Mylked and Shady Spa would interest you, the network as a whole won’t interest you. There are some good scenes on Club Tug, but they are 480p. I will end with while reviewing Mylked, I clicked “switch sites” and they have a different add-on showing up that you have to pay extra for, Mylked’s “switch sites” tab has “Gloryhole (unlock)” in it. When I was reviewing Shady Spa and Cum Blast City, the “switch sites” tab had “Tug Spy” or Spy Tug (unlock). If I were them, I would work on improving the content they have instead of possibly starting other new sites they don’t offer with their network. I mention this because their newest site, Edge Queens, was locked from me accessing it for nearly a week.
This network is a mess. Mylked is a good site as long as you accept every scene is going to be similar. I am giving it an 80 for the pretty models who do a good job of showing off their bodies while pleasuring the male.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site I thought I might like based on me liking a site that had dildos squirting fake cum on women.
316 scenes total and they are listing updates, but there were 276 scenes on the site in 2015.
Newest videos are 1080p, no other download options other than downloading the scene in parts.
This usually lands in the cons, but the scenes are short and it’s a pro.
Photos of the models posing with downloads.
Cons:
This will be the first time I ever listed this as a con, the women. There are some average looking women on here and they are the best looking women on the site.
There’s not even humor involved despite the fake cumshots.
The women trying to act like the cum is real.
The edit in every scene where I assume the male attaches or connects the cum squirter.
The older scenes are 480p
Bottom Line:
I joined a site a while back called Slime Wave. I thought I would hate it, it has dildos shooting large amounts of cum on the women. I liked it. I thought this site would be similar. It’s not. This site instead of having strategically placed squirting dildos, just has a man getting a blowjob, then he says he’s going to cum. The woman moves back, there is a video edit, and the continuous flood of cum squirts “out of his dick”. As much as I enjoyed Slime Wave, the site which is similar in its gimmick, seemed to lose my interest when the edit happened. I am not for sure if the man has some sort of sprayer he is squirting the fake cum from, but do believe that is what I didn’t like about this site. With Slime Wave, the fake cum was being shot out of fake dicks (dildos) with no man in sight. With this site, a real man with a real dick, is shooting fake cum out.
I have been a member of two different sites with clear edits in their scenes. I believe that may be the most off-putting action possible in a porn scene.
The site is large with 316 scenes, but I didn’t find myself interested in watching more than the ending to see if all the scenes have the obvious edit. From the ones I watched they all had the same edit right before the cumshot. I don’t understand the thinking behind this or the arousal for the viewer. It’s like watching a reality show only to find out it’s fake on the last episode. When one of my pros is the “scenes are short” it probably isn’t a good sign. Most of the scenes I watched, you can’t see the time on the scenes until you start watching/streaming or download them, were around 7 minutes. These look like they could just use the content from their other sites for the first 95% of the video, throw the edit in and introduce the gimmick of the real dick shooting gallons of fake cum. I wasn’t going to review this site until I noticed the dates on the scenes do show the site as updating weekly. I have read various member reviews about this network recycling their content and based on the The Best Porn review there were 276 scenes in 2015. There are only 316 scenes in 2021, but they show weekly updates. I am sure if there were weekly updates there would be far more updates in 6 years than 40.
I do find the site to be a negative on what is at best -- an okay network. The women try to act their way through the scenes on this specific site. They try to act like the fake cum surprises them and excites them. It has too much of a parody feel to the site. Which represents the biggest problem this site causes the entire network. The women on this site “act” like they do in their other scenes on the network. I also have now found my most disliked part of porn, an obvious edit in a scene.
The women on this site are average looking at best. There really isn’t anything that positive about this site other than network access. This site combined with their newer sites in the network makes me think a full network review will be sufficient instead of reviewing all the sites in the network. If you are familiar with Slime Wave or any of the sites that use fake cum shooting from dildos, do not believe this site has the same appeal. The sites with dildos shooting fake cum look more like a fetish and go into the Wet And Messy niche. This site fits the edited and should have been scrapped -- niche. Maybe they have scrapped it, but showing that it’s still updating weekly only makes it worse. This is one of my lowest scores for an individual site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A slightly different take on handjobs, blowjobs and teasing/edging.
42 scenes, but includes access to the 10 site Tug Pass network.
Variation of model types and looks.
1080p quality downloads on all 42 scenes.
Currently updating, but not much consistency to the updates.
Cons:
The consistency in updates, 2 new updates in January, 4 in February, 3 in March, 2 in April, 1 so far in May.
Unless I am missing something you can only download the videos in 1080p. I first thought it was streaming only, but realized to right click and save as.
I love variation in model looks and body types, but I don’t think everyone will have the same appreciation I do for the variation.
Scenes are short
Bottom Line:
The biggest reason I joined this network was I saw where they added a new site called Edge Queens. Women edging men is maybe my favorite niche in porn and it’s hard to find it unless you go to the sites that you have to pay per scene.
Shady Spa is a newer site too. The scenes are set in a spa or massage parlor type setting. One of the 42 scenes has 2 women, the other 41 only have one woman. The oldest scenes feature models wearing germ masks, I assume those were recorded when Covid first started up. The scenes are more straightforward than I expected. There’s a very short massage at the beginning of most scenes. Which to me is the most important part of these scenes. It’s trying to separate itself from every other handjob site. While the short massage is disappointing, the scenes don’t even really try to convince you they are anything other than a handjob scene or even a porn scene. The masseuse walks in while the man lays on the massage table, almost nude, or at most dressed provocatively. When I watch a porn scene with a theme, I want to believe the theme even if it’s outrageous and unbelievable. A masseuse walking in with a string bikini, pubic hair showing, nipples showing, does not make me think this is a “spa”. Even the dialogue works against the site’s theme and it’s because of how the masseuse is dressed or not dressed. A female masseuse walks in with pubic hair showing, nipples fully exposed and says, “Do you have any problem areas you need me to work on?” I want the male to say, “Well yes, I am here for a massage, put some clothes on.” If you are going to need some inkling of believability this site isn’t going to do much for you.
The model variation is good. There are some that look very young (18-22), some that look as old as maybe 40. There are very slim models, more average size and some that are on the larger side of average-sized. There is a good mix of races. Of the 42 scenes, I am playing a guessing game on a couple of these, at least 12 of the 42 scenes have women who look black, biracial, Latina or Asian.
I do like that there are more than just handjobs. Some of the scenes are as much blowjob as handjob. There is teasing. What I would describe as close to edging. The older models seem better at making the scenes more in-depth. The one scene with two women is probably the best scene on the site and should be something they consider doing more often.
The looks of the models is something I rarely criticize and I won’t on this site either, but I will say with a lot of these “models” their reactions and what seems to be genuine enjoyment, even arousal, tops their looks. Which could be a good thing since looks are subjective. I would think you could stick a perfect 10 model in these types of scenes, but if she’s not really into it, her looks wouldn’t save the scene. These women in these scenes are also clearly not actors. I have to think their enjoyment is genuine and that helps a lot.
I don’t think any of these models are professional models. I just wish there was more to the scenes. The scenes only average about 12 minutes. That includes the 1-2 minute massage at the beginning. It kind of feels like the guy is paying for a handjob/blowjob and the woman isn’t there to make a porn scene. She’s there to make him cum and get the scene over with.
I have looked everywhere for other video resolutions and formats, but I don’t believe there are any extra versions. You get 1080p on all 42 scenes and the only other option is to download the around 12 minute scenes in 5 parts. They do have pictures and those can be downloaded. The pictures are mostly of the model posing which you don’t see in the video.
It’s not a bad site, but it could be a lot better than it is.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A newer handjob, tease site I had never heard of until now.
- Much more than just a typical handjob site with pussy grinding, women masturbating themselves with one hand and see bottom line.
- Very big site for this genre with 398 models and 506 scenes.
- Updates once per week and download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Downloadable photos from the videos, they are screencaps, but they seem to go through and pick out the best moments for the photo sets.
- Easiest navigation I have seen in a long time. High quality site all-around. Has a tag system but would almost put that in cons since they need more specific tags.
- Rare blend of models for this genre. See bottom line.
Cons:
- Some of the female action parts won’t appeal to everyone. A lot of it is the woman fully nude straddling the man’s leg and humping his leg while giving the handjob.
- This one always comes up with me on all handjob sites. More tease. Will explain in bottom line.
- The company that owns the site has 3 other sites including a public handjob site. For the premium price, I would like to see them at least add the Public Handjobs site to Strokies.
Bottom Line:
Handjob sites are some of the most difficult sites to review since there’s usually not a lot going on in the scene. These guys at Strokies are trying to change that. Most of these scenes last over 30 minutes. I’m used to handjob scenes lasting 8-12 minutes. A very important part of handjob sites are the models. Models can show their worst side in handjob scenes. Especially the ones that try to talk dirty throughout the scene and end up saying the same 8 phrases repeatedly, “It’s so big”, “It’s so hard”, “Are you going to cum for me?” Some of the ones here are guilty of it too. I don’t want to go into a lecture but Howard Stern once did an episode where him and two of the other guys on his show brought in women to talk “dirty” to them. Only one “passed” and it was because she told them what she was going to do to them. She didn’t ask them questions which of course breaks the man’s concentration. Can you just see a man fingering a woman or giving her oral and stopping to ask if she’s going to orgasm? At least I’m laughing about it since that direct style of “dirty talk” and asking questions does nothing but annoy me.
What I established there is the importance of the model to a handjob scene. Not what she looks like, not how great her body is but instead how her personality is. It breaks down this simply: Does she just want you to cum to get the scene over (Are you going to cum for me?) or is she loving it and wanting to please you (I want your cum all over me). When I see that popping up on handjob sites, I’m going to expect some royalties.
This site does so many things right. They have a clear model list with nice, easy to see pictures of the model, they have a “videos” section. That’s where all the updates are. They have one extra tab, a “live” button which takes you to webcams. It’s unobtrusive. The only ads are 3 small ones at the bottom of the pages. When you click on a scene you can stream the video, read the tags and download the videos in 240p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. The pictures are just below the video downloads, you can view them or download them in a zip. Why can’t every site be this easy to use? It’s not like it’s a tiny site with nearly 400 models and just over 500 scenes.
I wish I could tell you if these are known models but I haven’t been following recent porn that much. The women are the prettiest and best range I have seen on a handjob site. There are Persian, Asian, Latina, black, white, even one dressed up like a Leprechaun. That’s one of the reasons for the high score. They are trying to improve a stale genre. Seeing handjob scenes that last 35 minutes is very unusual.
I have looked over the majority of the content and have not only seen some models I do know (Cindy Starfall, longtime favorite), but also noticed a lot of the older scenes don’t have tags. Other than that, in watching the Cindy Starfall scene to give an idea of how a handjob scene can last 30 minutes or more, she strips, she teases, she masturbates a little for the first 10 minutes of the video which is great to me. I did notice her scene is more of a straightforward handjob scene. In contrast one of the newer scenes I really like is of Mia Kay. The first five minutes or so is the guy talking to her and the entire time she’s giving a clear view of her panties up her skirt without making it look too obvious. She’s naked and masturbating to a very wet orgasm by 12 minutes in and then the handjob starts. That is something I have talked about in past reviews of all handjob sites. Why not let the woman masturbate before the handjob so it’s a good show for the viewer and it turns her on? Her thigh-riding stops with her licking the guy’s thigh where she was grinding her pussy. By 20 minutes in, she’s leaning back, fingering herself with one hand still giving the guy a handjob. Nearing the end, she turns around and sits on the guy’s face and keeps giving him a handjob until he cums. There’s even some mouth and tongue teasing on the head.
I won’t go too high with the score since I’m not happy about having to pay again for their Public Handjobs site which I don’t think has near as many videos as this site and I would still like to see more pussy on dick tease, butt on dick tease. There’s very little else to complain about. I don’t really have a list of sites I join on a regular basis anymore, but this one if nothing else is going to keep me around for more than one month so I can get all the scenes I want. I will then visit it periodically to get the new updates. Very nice surprise from a site I hadn’t ever heard of.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very erotic, uncensored, Japanese handjob site.
- It’s probably worth taking the cross-sale offer, they offer Fellatio Japan for $2.95 for 2 days, recurs at $19.95/mo. Fellatio Japan is $35 normally.
- High quality throughout, videos all have up to 1080p with 8000 bitrate, they also have 720p and 540p options.
- Very good photo/screencaps coming in at 5760x3840 and are downloadable in zips.
- There are 240 scenes and every one of them is worth downloading.
- Very good download speeds (80% of max)
- Vendo is the biller which is why I said it’s safe to take the cross-sale, if you don’t like Fellatio Japan you could easily cancel it before the 2 days are up.
- Clean navigation with simple buttons and the forever scroll feature.
Cons:
- They posted a message in May, that said they would no longer be updating the site. I don’t know if it’s Coronavirus-related or if it includes their other sites but 240 exclusive handjob scenes like these is a lot.
- Handjob porn always has this problem. Some of the women are very good with their hand. Others are not and those are usually the best since they turn to teasing the guy’s dick with their butt or pussy.
Bottom Line:
This was an impulse join. After watching so many censored Japanese porn films and seeing how much the women seemed to love dicks, I wanted to see uncensored. It shows on this site and I’m guessing on Fellatio Japan too. You see a lot of frenulum stimulation (thumb and tongue), the girls giggle and speak in Japanese with no subtitles. See, Zenra spoiled me with those subtitles. I have no idea what they’re saying, but they look happy and excited.
I would compare this directly to a site like Manojobs. It is shot from a POV camera of the man. Nearly half of the scenes have two Japanese women in them. There is plenty of female nudity and teasing too. Some of these models seem like they are just made for this type of porn from rubbing the dick to lightly blowing on it after letting a little saliva drip on the head. The eroticism is higher here than any handjob site I have seen.
I don’t know how much we are going to have to start taking into consideration the pandemic. This content is not only very good in action, but every video has up to 1080p resolution and the pictures are as big and clear as some of the top photo sites.
My favorite part between this site and other handjob sites is the way the models smile. I’m not trying to be negative about American models but we all have seen the look of anger or frustration from American models when trying to get the guy to cum. These Japanese models seem to like it the longer it takes.
I will probably end up trying Fellatio Japan just because this site has impressed me so much.
The only real complaint about the scenes is I would like to see all the models do the teasing with their body, not just with their hand. That’s about as minimal of a complaint as you can have.
There are 240 videos, just over 100 models, so that kind of gives you an idea of how many scenes have two models in them. A few of the models also have more than one scene.
I would recommend it to those who like handjobs, teasing, lots of smiles and seeing women who look to be very into the scene.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Fast server
+ A cheap join with the PU discount
+ 10 site access
+ Easy navigation (Due to dated layout - See cons)
+ 150 models
+ Easy cancellation
Cons:
- Layout very reminiscent of early porn sites
- Ridiculously low resolution video offered as new?
- Recycled content
- All files named 'high'
Bottom Line:
This is one of those times when I wish we could rate lower than 50. I'd give this about an 8 and feel like I was being generous. Did you happen to catch that I listed the ability to easily cancel a subscription as a plus? That's how sad this is. (By the way - the sole processor is now Rocketpay) I immediately knew it was a poor decision to sign up here when I instantly recognized an Alyssa Hart video on the first page that I'd seen the last time I was on the site years ago. The episode is named the same - with a different date than the file I had saved from my last join. The update schedule isn't really a schedule at all. Even with an apparent and pathetic once a week update, a site that's been online for going on eight years means there should be way more than the 216 videos available.
Their idea of high quality video and mine are way different. 720p video might have been considered high quality 25-30 years ago but this is 2020 where even 1080p is looking to fade into history with 5K video creeping into the world of online porn. Calling 720p high quality kind of ties in with the layout of the site. Everything about it looks like a 1990s site, giving me the impression that it's a real low maintenance affair. A plain white page, scroll down 12 episodes per page with a page jump at the end. Oh - and an ad with Trusted Partners. Gotta sell, sell, sell, right? And who, in 2020, still offers split scenes - especially when the average size of their files is under 300 megabytes? And PLEASE, people, stop forcing people to rename every file.
The only real positive I see here, if you want to call it that, is that I can update the old wmv files I had to mp4 and fill in the few episodes I'd missed between signups. Bottom line? Skip this site and all their bonus sites. They all suffer from the same poor layout and just about all same piss poor resolution videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network dedicated to handjobs and making you sign-in a lot.
- Marked improvement since my last review in 2017, models are prettier, new themed sites, there's only so much you can do with a dick and a hand, but all kidding aside, there's nice improvements here.
- Good PU discount, their homepage doesn't show the discount and says it's $29.95 but once you click to join it gives you the $14.95 option.
- Easy to use navigation and while the network hub doesn't work the way you might like it to, I actually think it's better this way, will explain.
- 11 sites total, all except one are handjob/blowjob/tease related.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- Downloadable videos (still can't believe that's a pro these days) and downloadable photo sets.
- I'm not for sure if it's the biggest handjob site/network but I'll get to the numbers in the bottom line. I think based on my memory it is the biggest handjob network.
- No ads beyond a page of ads when you first sign in.
Cons:
- The video download options and quality and filenames need some work. You have one full scene download option or you can download them in 4 parts. The full scene downloads vary from 480p, 720p or 1080p. You don't know what it will be until you've downloaded it and they're all named "high".
- This was a pro for me, it might be a con for you. The network hub shows all the sites available. When you click one, you have to login to it. That's frustrating for some but I will explain why I prefer it.
- Update schedule is kind of all over the place.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined this network it was after seeing a few of their scenes on tube sites. I think those scenes came from their site Club Tug which is the big site here. It was mostly older women, sometimes with a younger woman helping, in what was similar to CFNM with edging thrown in. They've since added multiple new sites. I think a common complaint for the older scenes was the models weren't always attractive. The newer scenes on their newer sites seem to be higher level models.
One con I didn't include is one I haven't ever figured out whose fault it is. Rocketgate is the biller. I have used them many times and I don't like that they store or remember your purchases and try to get you to sign up without putting your payment info in. One of the cards they have on file for me expired 2 years ago. Even worse, here on this site, it rechecks the pre-checked cross-sale, it also changed the price from $14.95 to $19.95. If the biller is doing this these sites need to let them know it's going to hurt their business.
The con about the hub requiring you to sign in on each site, which kind of makes it not really a hub. I like this better because you get a member's area that is exclusive to whatever site you sign into. So, when you click the model's list, say on their site Mylked, all the models are on Mylked. You don't get network-wide results. I prefer that. They do give you a randomly generated username and password so you have to keep on your notepad to remember it or copy/paste it in.
Club Tug is still the big site here. It has 436 scenes by my count, the hub says it has 500+, but just doing simple math of 12 scenes per page, 36 pages = 432 + 4 more on the 37th page. It's updating once a week. This site has a wide range of scenes from one woman giving the guy a handjob/blowjob while another woman watches and masturbates to grannies giving handjobs.
They have Tease POV which has 75 scenes and looks to be updating once per month. These are really good scenes that include more creativity than most handjob sites.
A newer site for them is Finish Him, it has 78 scenes and these are more like edging, some have two women, very good scenes. These newer sites they have really have added some life to the network. It updates once per month.
The newest site, Mylked, is the traditional milking table type scene where the woman lays under a table with the man laying on the table with his dick through a hole, kind of like horizontal gloryhole. There are 41 scenes on it and I would say they are some of the best on the site.
This is where it gets more complex. Cum Blast City looks like fake cum but after watching multiple scenes it looks real. This site would be very popular for those that like seeing a woman covered with cum. It has 320 scenes. The more I look at it, it looks like some of the scenes are fake dicks with fake cum, others are real dicks with real cum that must not have had sex in a decade.
Over 40 Handjobs has 240 scenes here and they're what they say, some are just an over 40 woman giving a younger guy a handjob, others are an over 40 with a younger woman giving a guy a handjob.
A fairly rare one with Ebony Tugs, there's 50 scenes of black girls over varying age, attractiveness and body type giving handjobs.
See Mom Suck is next with 112 scenes. This one isn't as good. Some of the mom's look like they just stepped out of the 1980s. Just being fair.
Mean Massage has 131 scenes, some of this is humiliation, but it's not that bad and some of it is quite good.
Teen Tugs has 211 scenes, these are very good and do good job of following the teen theme except for the few models that look like they probably have teenage daughters.
Last is Petite 18, it's out of place here, it has 71 scenes and they're all regular porn sexual intercourse scenes.
I did that so I could add the scenes up. That's 1,694 handjob-related scenes and I'm not counting the Petite 18 scenes in that number. I'm positive that makes it the biggest handjob site on the internet.
I spent more time on this than usual. It looks like the sites Mylked, Finish Him, Tease POV and the newer Club Tug scenes are the ones with 720p or 1080p videos. The rest of the sites seems to 480p. I based that on downloading the 4 newest scenes from each site. I'm not going to take anything off for those but those 480p ones aren't helping the score either. I sit close enough to a 32" monitor that 480p isn't terrible. I'm more bothered by the filenames all being "high". I have a folder full of "high", "high (1)", "high (2)" and so on. I think with a little work there they could score even higher. I'm giving them a 13 point boost over my last score. They do seem to be working on improving the site and adding new scenes with better looking models, plus the higher video quality.
The different scenarios they use does make it a little more unique than other handjob sites, too. Recommended to tease, handjob/blowjob fans.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nuru Massage is part of the Adult Time network. You get access to over 50,000 premium hardcore videos at the Adult Time network.
-I don't have good information on the pricing of the different memberships to either Adult Time or Nuru Massage, because I'm a current member of Adult Time, so if I click on a hot link of an offer to join Adult Time, I go directly to the Adult Time membership pages, bypassing the posted prices to join.
-PU shows a discounted price of $9.95 for the first month of Adult Time, though whether that includes downloading is not shown. The price jumps to $29.95 after the first month.
Adult Time also runs special prices on ads of $5.00 for the first month, or $9.95 for the first month, for streaming only access.
-PU shows a discounted price of $14.95 for the first month for a direct subscription to Nuru Massage (which includes access to the Adult Time network), recurring at $29.95/month. I assume that would include downloading.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Nuru Massage is a large channel on Adult Time, with 635 videos listed for a search of "Nuru Massage".
CONS(START OF):
-The navigation can be clunky at times. They are updating/changing the network structure.
A while ago, it was easier to select a channel, and see clearly the number of videos at the channel, and to find a listing of the channel videos in chronological order. That seems to have vanished, in the currrent structure, at least for channels with a large number of videos.
I open the Adult Time channel member page, select the "channels" hot link, type in Nuru Massage in the search box, hit my Enter key, and it brings up:
'Search results for "nuru massage"'
Videos
-Thumbnails for a few videos, that I assume are from the Nuru Massage channel;
Pornstars
-Thumbnails for a few porn stars, that I assume are featured in Nuru Massage videos;
Channels
-View all channels hot link, which I assume will bring up a listing (partial) of all channels for Adult Time network.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Movies
-View all movies;
And other thumb nails/hot links to other channels in the Adult Time network.
They previously had a tremendous amount of content, but it was easier to navigate, with less steps to find specific channels, to find the content at each channel.
But they are fucking up the Adult Time network, because the site programmers don't bother to keep the navigation simple: instead, they are adding channels, and making the network a jumbled mess.
So instead of adding value to the network, by adding more content and more channels, they are making the network harder to use, which decreases the value of the network, by making it harder to find the content of each channel.
Formerly, it was easy for me to go to some of my favorite channels (such as Pure Taboo), and examine the content at the channel, either by chronological listing, or by porn star.
But now I have a hard time reviewing Nuru Massage, because I can't easily find a simple listing of the channel's contents.
And this review is messed up, because I'm trying to focus on the Nuru Massage channel, but the Adult Time network navigation problems keep getting in the way of a simple review of Nuru Massage.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
With 635 videos at the Nuru Massage channel, there are a huge amount of porn stars in these videos.
Many are A-list stars.
Heather Starlet, Elsa Jean, Kyler Quinn, Dakota Skye, Kenna James, the list goes on and on.
They try to add a plot to the Nuru Massage videos.
The plot is usually a short lead-in the the massage and sex.
The plot, as is usual for most porn videos, is fairly stupid and unbelievable.
And the acting skills of the porn models is rudimentary.
So why bother with a plot?
It shows the producers are trying to make the sex video more interesting or worthwhile than just a straight hardcore porn video showing two or more bodies slapping against each other.
But some sites do or a much better job, with the plot element actually adding value to the sex.
Pure Taboo is a channel that features twisted plots, great production values, some really interesting videos that can be very erotic.
The Porn Fidelity and Teen Fidelity sites can also have interesting plots, great production values, and very erotic videos.
The Nuru Massage videos feature stupid plots, that you have to be really drunk to believe, or are better ignored.
Some of the models are very attractive, so that can make the videos worth watching.
If you're watching these videos with a partner, it's an excellent reason to get drunk, because that would be a great lead-in to having real-life personal sex while watching these videos.
Kenna James has a Nuru Massage video. The plot is stupid, the acting is poor, but Kenna James is fucking attractive.
So if you can ignore the stupid plot and poor acting, you can watch Kenna James seduce her stepfather: all in the interests of bringing her family closer together.
Bottom line:
Since the plots are so silly, and the acting is amateurish, I much prefer other sites that feature massage-themed sex. The Tricky Masseur site at Teen Mega World is one of my favorites.
The same videos at Tricky Masseur are also featured at the Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), at Rub A Teen (part of the Team Skeet network), at 18 Virgin Sex, and probably at other sites, as well. In those videos, the plot is simpler: a girl walks into a room for a massage, she undresses, the masseur rubs her down, she becomes aroused, and they have sex.
The simpler plot is easier to act, and more believable.
And the girls in those videos are mainly attractive.
And the sex can be hot.
Which is why I much prefer those simple massage videos over the nuru massage videos.
The Dane Jones massage videos also keep the plot simpler, which is much easier to act, easier to accept, than the Nuru Massage videos.
Since I don't appreciate the Nuru Massage videos, I'm giving the channel a score of 79.
But if you include access to the rest of the Adult Time network, the score would jump to the 90s or more.
SEE THE FIRST REPLY TO THIS REVIEW FOR A SAMPLE DESCRIPTION OF A NURU MASSAGE VIDEO.
Females are mostly young, but there are chubbier models, slimmer models and various races.
Cons:
The other reviews I've read said they are recycling content. I didn't know what that meant. I'm not for sure they are. One of the newest scenes is of Allie Addison. I saw her on ALS Scan and they were saying it's her first year in porn. Some might be recycled or they may have removed some, but for this niche this is a lot of content.
I was frustrated with Rocketgate which caused the problem I had to contact the site's customer service about.
Bottom Line:
This is your standard handjob site, but there is a lot more going on here. Some of the models get on top of the guy and tease their vagina against the male's penis. Some slide the guy's penis up and down between their butt cheeks. Others stick the penis between their boobs and some turn into oral and oral teasing.
The more advanced scenes seem to be over the last 3-4 years. Maybe people/fans complained that the handjob action was getting repetitive. The different types of scenes really makes this site excellent.
The models are all in the better looking to very pretty group. That is not common in this niche.
The sites that come with blend in too. Mr. POV is POV sex, if you get tired of watching handjobs you can watch sex from the perspective of the camera. The other is The Dick Suckers. It's a lot like Mano Job except you're going to see oral in every scene. The sites combined have around 1,400 scenes total.
I like it a lot. There is a good amount of focus on the man and his enjoyment. The models all look to be having fun and the scenes with more than just a handjob are better than hardcore sex scenes for me.
The download options are unique. You can download on 1080p, 720p, Web Version, Mobile Version, Cumshot only or Exclusive Interview. You can also stream another option -- the slo-mo cumshot. You can make a playlist with your favorite scenes in it so they play in a row. You can favorite your favorite models.
The site is simple to use. It has a dropdown box to change the site you are viewing. The model index can be viewed in alphabetical order and when you click on a model it shows you all of her scenes on each of their sites.
The models are usually in skimpy clothing, but some wear regular looking outfits, some are topless in the scenes, some are fully nude, it kind of is the pattern on this site. They are covering a lot of bases.
They do tag most of their scenes as J.O.E. sometimes tagged on other sites as J.O.I. J.O.E is jerk off encouragement. I haven't seen any scenes with insults from the women. That is a plus for me. I like to see both people enjoying themselves not one belittling the other.
This will go into my very short list of favorite sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A large site. Currently 569 videos.
-Still updating. About 1 video per week.
-The videos are professionally hot: this is a premium site: Everything is first class: nice sets, good camera work, good lighting, clear, crisp images.
-streaming is offered in 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
-downloading is offered in 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
-All content is exclusive.
Let me note exclusive content: many tube sites can have some edited videos from Nuru Massage (and many other porn sites). The tube sites can offer good samples of the content of porn sites, giving you an idea of what those porn sites offer.
-The quality of the models is good: the models are mainly in their late teens or twenties. Many of them are attractive women. Mostly white.
-Each video has a good quality photo set. The photos seem excellent quality, probably from a camera instead of the more common screen-cap conversion software program found at many hardcore sites.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-There is a lower-cost streaming only membership offered through Adult Time.
As well as a higher-priced streaming plus downloading membership from Adult Time.
I don't see a streaming-only membership offered from Nuru Massage: the memberships seem to be streaming plus downloading.
-Even though I said there was good sound control (meaning there not a lot of loud, extraneous noises in the video, and even though the models are speaking in English, it's sometimes hard to understand the spoken words. Maybe it's an echo effect, or something.
But except for hearing the moans and groans and grunts of sex (which, if believable, help increase the heat of the video), the meaning of most dialogue is basically irrelevant to the action: it's the sex that counts, not what the models are saying (except in unusual situations, where the plot can add meaning, so it's nice to be able to follow the plot, if there is one).
Bottom Line:
This is a massage-themed porn sites.
There is a brief back story which sets up the action, which is a nuru massage (a sexual massage).
Nuru massage is an actual massage technique from Japan.
But Nuru Massage is a porn site that is part of the Fantasy Massage network from Gamma Entertainment.
The site and network was folded into Adult Time network last year.
A membership in Adult Time should give you access to the Fantasy Massage network.
However, it seems that Adult Time slices and dices the Gamma sites that are offered in different memberships: the basic membership offers streaming only. Unlimited.
The premium membership (at a higher price) offers streaming and downloading. Unlimited.
The Adult Time memberships are still given out on a random basis, if you join one of the satellite sites in the network.
You can join Adult Time directly but you will pay a higher price than if you join a member site during a discounted holiday special.
Adult Time network is the crown jewel, offering access to 142 channels (sites).
As far as content, you should have access to around 48,869 hardcore videos that were professionally shot: this means, mainly, good camera work, good lighting, good sets, good sound control, etc.
So the Adult Time network is a fantastic deal if you can get it at a reduced price.
A ton of good hardcore videos, covering a wide variety of niches, with thousands of porn stars, many of them well-known or famous.
If you don't get access to the Adult Time network with your membership to Nuru Massage or Fantasy Massage, then you are missing out on a huge amount of quality porn in the rest of the Adult Time network.
Sorry to keep repeating myself: But the important point is:
Adult Time network is the jewel: vast amount of hardcore porn, covering a wide variety of niches, with a large number of female porn stars.
Any membership in one of the Adult Time sites that does not include access to the entire Adult Time network means you are paying a high price for the limited amount of content you have access to.
The porn landscape has changed dramatically since the introduction of Adult Time.
A competing network, Lets Doe It (which recently changed its name from Porn Doe Premium), has over 40 sites, some of which are really outstanding (The White Boxxx does a great job presenting its models as gorgeous creatures), but Adult Time has far more content, and the quality of the porn at some of the sites is truly outstanding.
Of course, porn is a matter of personal taste: so what appeals to me might be boring to you, and vice versa.
But if you had to join only one porn site, my choice would be the Adult Time network.
Except to get a lower price, you should probably join through one of the member sites.
But first get a confirmation you will be getting access to the Adult Time network.
Getting back to the Nuru Massage site: Nuru Massage has 569 so it's a large site.
Most of the videos are Boy/Girl massage.
But there are also some Girl/Girl and Girl/Girl/Boy videos, for variety.
The Boy/Girl videos, although supposedly a Nuru massage, have less massage and more girl grabs boy's cock, licks and kisses it, partial blowjob, short fuck, and what else can they do?
I actually found many of the massage videos at Tricky Masseur (part of Teen Mega World), which are also found at the Diesel Network and at Rub A Teen (part of the Team Skeet network) to be more erotic.
I prefer the Tricky Masseur videos to the Nuru massage videos, because the action seems more realistic, and hotter.
I'm giving the Nuru Massage a score of 82. If you add in access to the entire Adult Time network, streaming and downloading, at a discounted price, then the score jumps to 95.
I'm not impressed with Nuru Massage.
I am impressed with some of the sites and some content of Adult Time.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A no longer updating site in the Fantasy Massage network, that I personally think it the best site in the network even without updates.
- This massage niche was very popular for a few years then kind of dropped off. For me, the best ones didn't try to be that different from scene to scene and this one excels at that.
- Surprising overall quality considering it launched in 2008 and stopped updating in 2014, every video has up to 1080p quality downloads.
- Maybe the most realistic "fantasy" site possible since you would typically be nude or mostly nude.
- Very good DL speeds (80% and up of my max)
- Good navigation and despite the fact that it stopped updating in 2014, there's a fairly large catalog of content here (will go into in BL).
- One of the few niches that doesn't require acting ability!
- Photos with each scene that are screenshots.
Cons:
- This niche as much as any, has the "it's going to become repetitive" factor.
- As mentioned, it no longer updates.
- The scenes that try to do too much. Will go into in BL.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed another site from the Fantasy Massage network a few weeks ago and talked about how I thought this niche was very underrated but also poorly produced. A lot of massage scenes these days are just plain hardcore scenes that happen to look like a massage led into the sex.
Massage Parlor is the typical porn site of 2018. For me, it did way more right than wrong and it's one of the sites the network stopped updating. There's a part of me that believes these sites that stop updating, stop updating because they require more money to film, more time to plan, etc...
What stands out here is the vast majority of these scenes start out with the female masseuse talking to the male. The first 4-7 minutes is a believable massage, some of the masseuses start becoming aroused and grind their bodies into the man being massaged, they perform the massages in either robes that drape open or in sexy lingerie. It then progresses to either a handjob or a blowjob, usually further progressing into a 69 and the scenes last right at 20 minutes each.
That's believable to me. The massage scenes that turn into full sex, loud screaming and moaning, don't come off as believable. I would hate to think the main reason this site stopped updating was because it doesn't have much full sex on it but it does seem like that would also be believable. A couple of the other sites in the network also follow a similar beginning as Massage Parlor but go directly into full sex. I see massages as erotic, teasing and if done right, even mysterious. The temptation of going a little further than touching/massage is a realistic progression.
The good part is if you like this content there are 314 scenes on it and as mentioned in the pros, all 314 have up to 1080p downloadable versions.
You can see where they've tried alternate setups. They have some that have a masseuse in training, with the experienced masseuse playing something of a dominating role and forcing the trainee to give the male a blowjob. They have ones that the setting looks more like a hotel room than a massage parlor and a few that turn into multiple guys getting massages and blowjobs from the one masseuse.
I mentioned that acting isn't required in this niche and I believe that. The only thing required of the female masseuse is for her to give erotic rubs of her hand onto the man. This believably turns the masseuses on. Eye movements, eye contact, expressions, even breathing patterns work in that situation.
It's similar to my interest in handjob and CFNM porn. I like to see natural reactions from the females more than relying on their acting ability to make me believe they're enjoying themselves.
One of my favorite parts of this site are the models. One in particular, Chloe Amour, seems to love doing this kind of porn. She reminds me of Jessica Alba in some sort of odd way and she has 17 videos on this network.
Which is why I'm comfortable saying this style of porn is different than hardcore. Some of the models on here are extremely good at this style but are dull, dime-a-dozen, in regular porn.
This is one of those rare cases where I rate a site higher than its network. I've tried explaining that before and think I've figured it out. It's my way of saying, I would join this site whether it had the network access or not. I do think in this age of networks ruling porn, there are sites on those networks that stand out whether with our personal preferences or favorite niches. I've mostly heard negative comments from webmasters that say, "How can you score a site a X but only score the network that the site is IN a Y?" There, I explained it! The network itself is very good overall but I think the content on Massage Parlor shows that the network's other sites are very formulaic and are trying to meet some kind of criteria.
This network and site also gives me access to Adult Time but I am not figuring Adult Time into this review. This is solely on Massage Parlor. In my opinion, it's the best of the female gives male a massage niche.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A relatively large site in the Fantasy Massage network. Focuses mostly on M/F but there are F/F and up to threesomes.
- Some well-known models and others that might be more mainstream than I realize but all are attractive.
- DL speeds are very good (80% of my max and above).
- Oldest content dates back to 2009 and the videos all have 1080p options, picture set with each scene and can be downloaded in zip files.
- I'm guessing it's one of the oldest massage sites. It updates weekly and has 529 scenes as of 11/13/2018.
- Very good mixture of models, it seems at one time they were going for Asian models but there are other races.
- Any site that's been around since say around 2010, has a high collector potential since a lot of these models have stopped modeling. They have one of my favorites in multiple scenes, the highly underrated Lana Violet.
Cons:
- It's mostly nitpicking, model list includes men and there's no way to filter the men out. Unless I missed it.
- Some scenes never really feel like a massage scene. That could be the use of known pornstars. No offense is meant to Asa Akira but as soon as I see her I think porn!
Bottom Line:
I have to admit something about my interest in this genre. Over the last few months, I started dating an Esthetician. It has opened my eyes to this profession, massages and waxes. I've also talked about how I sometimes delve into the dark world of fantasizing about the woman I'm with doing things with other men. Trust me, it's not that I like that side of me but it works.
Nuru Massage's older content especially goes into that part of massages. The newer content does to an extent but some of it really just feels like it could be a scene in a normal porn movie. The basis, again, especially in the older scenes, is a man (usually) goes to get a massage. The masseuse oils him up, giving him peeks up her skirt, at her cleavage and usually takes the porn turn when she notices the tent being pitched by the towel laying across his crotch. This works for me. Especially with the Asian models. Because the woman I've been dating is Filipino and the minute she thinks sex might happen she's ready. Doubt it if you must but there's at least one other member on here with a Filipino wife who would tell you the same thing. So, I really prefer the scenes with the Asian models.
I think these sites, any of them, these days are stuck with the models they have access to and more and more, whether on Bang Bros or Brazzers, there's a lack of interest/passion. Some of the newer scenes here at Nuru Massage also have that problem. The good part is, as far back as their content goes, you can get HD quality videos. It's kind of like you don't have to start at the newest content to find the best quality.
Any site that stays within their theme/niche has the potential to become repetitive but I will say they do a good job here of mixing things up. You get some F/F scenes, some with F/F/F, some M/F/F and the standard M/F which for me is the most believable. I think if I had the chance to produce a scene or two, I would look into working in more from less. Every scene doesn't have to progress to sex. Have it stop at a handjob or a blowjob. With the name "fantasy" in the network name, I would play more to that. Instead of following every other hardcore porn scene.
The models are very attractive. One of the ones I didn't know of that I really like is Rilynn Rae, other longtime favorites like Uma Jolie, even everybody's favorite MILF Brandi Love (she has a really good scene with Uma Jolie on All Girl Massage, in this network.) Keisha Grey is here with all her lovely curves. And as mentioned, Lana Violet who I originally knew of thanks to Twistys years ago. I find scenes of her about twice a year.
You also get the niche on top of niche with some scenes playing into the step-family niche. That is seen more on the All Girl Massage site with stepmoms and stepdaughters massaging each other. But there are some on Nuru as well. You know when Brandi Love shows up she's somebody's stepmother!
The navigation is very good across the network even. It's a Gamma network so if you've been a member of any of the Fame Digital networks, it works like those do. You have the different network sites on the left and can go to each seamlessly. At the top you have categories, which is more useful here than on a lot of sites because you can pick the actions you want to see and it lists them by the action. I'll point out here that I myself like the "Pussy rubbing cock" action and while it might be a little too broad in its results, it does pull out (not intended) the scenes with that great tease.
They have the model list with the problem mentioned in the cons but that's pretty common for networks to include the males in the list. I really believe the only problem that can be legitimately be complained about is it can become repetitive. My years of only joining solo sites tells that repetitive doesn't bother me as long as it's good repetitive. Most of this content is good. It adds almost a softer side to hardcore but doesn't fall into heartcore area.
The other complaint is my own. Just mix it up some, beyond F/F scenes and F/F/F scenes. Have the masseuse use a wand massager on the guy's back and thighs and then in-between her and him. It's minor stuff that I think would keep the content fresher. No complaints on the quality. I will say the picture sets are screenshots from the videos so it's not a 50-100 picture set of just the female. It's hard to complain about that these days since a lot of sites are going completely away from pictures. As that old saying goes something is better than nothing. I think this site would appeal to those who like hardcore, those who like a theme and those who know an Esthetician who likes to tell you about her experiences doing waxes (close enough to massages) and how the clients (both female and male) "respond". I haven't checked out all of the network yet but I will and maybe some of my own twisted fantasies are in here somewhere. As a network it's very good and recommended.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best handjob site on the internet and it's not even close.
- Has network access with it, but I scored this site 9 points higher than the network, it's a miring network that takes away from this site.
- Unlike the rest of the network, Mano Job is updating with new content and isn't recycling.
- An unheard of, unmatched, roughly 800 handjob videos.
- Some well-known models and some that I probably just don't know by names.
- Probably internet porn's best tagging system. Will go more into this in BL.
- They experiment with niches by adding CFNM elements to some scenes, and using the various actions that are well-tagged and easy to find.
- Very good download speeds.
- Excellent technical quality on this site with over 700 of those videos having 1080p option. Also pictures with zips if interested in those.
Cons:
- Is it fair to say the network it's on? The main two other sites in the network are recycling, which causes me to think the whole network is recycling. When on the network's hub, you get a mix from the 3 sites so it takes away from the Mano Job content.
- I think its price is a little high, it's fairly unique content and they do it better than anyone, but it's $30.
- There's still a listed but undefined download limit. I really don't believe it's there.
- Really the only real con is the common one. It's a niche site and all scenes are fairly similar, it can and does become boring.
Bottom Line:
I have only scored a site from a network, higher than its network, one time before this. Think it was Nubiles.net. I actually think in this case it's a big difference. The network this site is on has around 1,300 scenes. A little over 800 of those scenes are on this site, Mano Job. I've been told, "You don't have to go to the other sites", it's not the point. If you sell me something as a network, then I have expectations. Because I brought up some rather negative points about the network, I thought it was only right and fair for me to come back and post something more positive about this site. One more part on this, the site Chelci Fox, which isn't advertised as included, but is included as you find out later in your membership, is now fixed and operational. Good job by them to update the certificate or whatever it was that was causing a problem. There's a full explanation in the comment section on that problem.
I think the first big question here is "is Mano Job recycling?" My instinct tells me no. They're updating quite a bit, I think 16 out of the 19 days of December, so far, but these scenes look new. I hate that I'm not as caught up on the current models, but will say one of the December updates if of Roxy Deville, who I do know is retired. It could be something they recorded before she retired and are just now getting around to releasing. Most of the rest of the models aren't familiar to me.
Why would I make such a bold claim as "the best handjob site"? Simple. Handjob sites are notorious for having repeat models, not just a few or the not intended pun of a handful of times, but many handjob sites have about 12-15 women who they use for 100 scenes. I still believe this site is somehow related to Fucked Hard 18 and the models here are very comparable to the models on Fucked Hard 18. Young, some curvy, different races and nearly all are attractive. Which is something you'll also have trouble finding on handjob sites. So, that's part of my reasoning behind "the best".
Then there's the amount of content. There are handjob "networks" that don't have half the amount of content this site has. The oldest scene is from December 2005, so they've been around a long time even though they didn't update much back then...
Which does make me question the recycling possibility. But if they are recycling some old scenes, they are doing so in remastered 1080p.
The tagging system deserves its own section. Handjobs are fairly basic. But as the genre once grew into a popular one, it stopped being the common handjob. Things like Tit-fucking were added. Pussy Tease was added. Butt Tease was added. The out of control, breaking the rules, Oral option was added. The tags might not be 100% right, but they are pretty accurate. I think in a handjob genre, those little tagged niches are very important. It kind of reminds me of lesbian sites that tag every action in a scene, which is a great help. I get tired of watching videos looking for one certain action only to not see it.
And those combined reasons make it the best handjob site.
I think as porn viewers and users (same thing?) get more and more used to common cookie-cutter porn scenes, they'll start looking into handjobs, CFNM, since I'm pretty sure that's what happened to me.
The one part that might surprise potential members are the pictures. Again, the thought going into this content is very good. I really didn't think I would care anything about pictures from a handjob site, but at least 1/3 of the pictures (in downloadable zips) are just of the model before the handjob, teasing, in her regular clothes and that actually adds to the content.
Seeing that the vast majority of the content is available in 1080p helps for those into the technical aspects. The videos also have the 720p option and "web" and "mobile" versions. They also do have a "cumshot" option in the videos. This site, in and of itself is impressive.
I have very little to say about the other sites in the network. You might find something you like on them, but I didn't. The Chelci Fox one has some interesting content that does look fairly old (maybe 2005-2010 era?), but is typical solo girl-type content.
I also think this is a good example of a question that has been asked here on PU. The price does hurt the score. Based on the standards that are used in grading a site, it's very close to a 100, by itself, it does everything it says and they have evolved it with new situations and actions, but the price and inclusion in a network that's not very good, brings the score down a little. I'm doing math there and thinking if it wasn't sold as a network, the price would be cheaper for this one site.
If you're looking for handjob content this is really the only site you need to join. If you're looking for something different than the normal porn, this would be a good alternative to try. Most of the big name models I know of, are on here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network almost exclusively dedicated to handjobs.
- There's probably more handjob content on this network than any other site or network, I'll get to that and the numbers in the bottom line.
- Download speeds are good.
- Eight sites are included in the network, but probably should just be combined into one site.
- Had some problems with this network when I tried joining their "full access" trial, so I came back as a full member and the problems are at least fixed.
Cons:
- Underwhelming. I think that word sums up the network as a whole. A lot of the models have no business being called models. The navigation is very bad. It requires a login for each of the 8 sites, despite having a network hub page. The video quality ranges from average to terrible.
- Just a note on this, back several months ago, I joined this network on a trial subscription. It originally worked as a "full trial", but after downloading 12-15 videos, it started booting me off the site. As mentioned in the pros, I didn't have these problems once I joined as a full member, but anyone considering the trial should be aware.
- Well, eventually you find a good scene, if you figure out how to find the scenes.
Bottom Line:
You might find this hard to believe, but I'm having trouble counting the number of scenes on the network simply because there's no way for me to find them. I kid you not, if you go to the homepage, this is what you're going to find:
Three mentions of new sites added to the network.
Latest prize giveaway
Two newest "Bonus Sites" which are also listed above in the "new sites" links.
A top 10 Most Popular Scenes list
A top 10 Top Rated Scenes list
The 5 latest updates
If you go to say the Club Tug site and login you are presented with the same page from above except it now has the top 10s from just Club Tug and last 5 updates from Club Tug. Eventually, you'll click on "updates" and find a scroll-a-thon through the scenes on the site. There's no filter, no way to search, but there is at least a model tab to find models you like.
I don't know whether this is sad or even real, but you receive a pop-up letter from the webmaster explaining how they offer the best customer service and feel free to email him.
Here's some numbers I have found:
Roughly 600 videos across the network. The newer videos are 1280x720, but a lot drop into the 480p range. There's no real way to know how new any of these scenes are. There's a date, but no year. Looks like they update 10 times a month, which is a respectable number.
I was pretty rough on their models in the cons, but it's true. I understand the concept of beauty if in the eye of the beholder, but there's some terribly bad looking women on this site.
Which is where I will shift gears a little. There's some well-known models here as well. There's quite a few pretty models. And as said, the newer videos are 720p quality. The newer sites, TeasePOV, Mean Massage, and Petite 18 are all good overall. Tug Job itself has plenty of good scenes on it. So, it's not all negative.
I think they could move all of the "sites" onto one site, put a decent basic search engine on it and they'd have an above-average site. As it is, you better have a good mouse with a good scroll wheel and some patience. There's good content here you won't find anywhere else or at least I've not seen before.
Quite a few of the scenes go into plots similar to CFNM sites. The Mean Massage site goes into femdom and cum-controlling. Some of it covers fairly rare content, but you'll have to find it. For me, one month was more than enough. I wouldn't pay the full price for this network. There's just too many headaches and cussing my monitor for full price. Maybe they'll get it cleaned up some with a new interface? Until then, I can't recommend it except for those who love handjobs.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Decent sized site/network with lots of clips, but not very large data-wise since the videos aren't huge
- Improved video quality since last review
- Allows download managers
- Good download speeds
- Pictures sometimes available along with videos, although sometimes just for viewing and not always as .zip
Cons:
- Ads behind the paywall.
- All videos are named the same thing ("high")
- Some links to photo sets that go nowhere other than a "back to video" page.
- No video quality choices.
- Directing/editing isn't well thought out at times
- Older videos are still really low quality
- $30 seems a bit overpriced.
Bottom Line:
I was a member years ago and was unimpressed, but I thought I would give Clubtug another shot since I saw some bigger names listed as models. The network/site has definitely gotten better. It still comes across as amateurish in a lot of ways (yes lots of amateur models, but also an amateur site), but it's improving.
My feeling was that it's mostly a handjob network with a bit of intercourse (Tease POV IIRC), but don't expect much beyond masturbation and a bit of oral here and there.
There was a large popup ad for other sites after you login that you have to click "no thanks, continue to the site" (or similar) to get to the site you paid for, and ads throughout the site. Each site on the network required an individual login as well, but the sites don't seem to log you out frequently, so I'm okay with the individual login requests.
One of the big problems with the site in the past was tube-quality videos (or worse). This has improved, and according to VLC the newer clips are 720. There are no video quality choices, however, and the old tube-quality clips are designated as "high" exactly like the new 720 clips, so there's no way to know which you're getting until you view it.
The videos are fairly watchable now, although there are some bad choices like stationary filming, poor visibility from bad angles, or attempting to use a macro ring to light up-close scenes similar to Amateur Allure. I don't care much for it there, and it's even less successful here. The lighting washes out the models' skin and they lose most detail in their face/body, and the cumshot washes out the same way on the stark white, flat face. I appreciate trying something new, but it's a shame the actresses like India Summer and Alexis Fawx weren't just filmed with a good lens on a mid-level Canon SLR with decent natural lighting.
Other problems are things like models giving a handjob while fully clothed and then abruptly wearing bra and panties before abruptly being naked. I don't think a storyline is necessary, but 30 extra seconds of transitioning through the models undressing would help the scenes overall.
That said, there are some good choices like POV scenes with a naked model sitting between a (laying on his back) man's legs with HER legs open as she masturbates him. Those scenes are fairly inspired and were nice to see.
I think $20 is probably a more appropriate non-promo day-to-day price, but the site's owners have brought in some bigger names like Veronica Avluv, Dava Foxx, and India Summer, so the $30 isn't unreasonable in light of attracting and paying talent. I personally would recommend the owners get more of Christina Sky(e?) and the actress named Harley. Both seemed fairly interested in what they were doing, and that goes a long way in making the scenes believable/enjoyable. Not to mention you can probably get five or more scenes for what India or Avluv charges for one. FWIW, there are still some less attractive models and the videos from my first review are still there, but the quality of models has improved over the last couple of years.
Bottom line: I reviewed the network under Clubtug last time and they only earned a 62, but the details have improved enough that I'm adding ten+1 points for them putting in the effort and making it a decent site. It's not an especially innovative or outstanding site, but if there are more than a few actresses there doing things you enjoy watching, it's probably worth checking out at least once, especially if you can get a discounted rate.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some Original Content emphasis on some
Cons:
Few updates, let me clarify they upload about 1-3 items per day but those items are videos that have been on the site for months with minor changes such as the name of the video or the water mark on it.
Little original content most of the videos are taken from scenes out of dvds such as hand to hand combat and destination tonsils with one change they add their sites water mark.
Most of the new videos are taken from their other sites such as throng vixens, babes in jeans, jerk off instructions etc they have about 30 individual sites they cycle the videos through.
Customer service is slow to respond and gives cookie cutter responses that have nothing to do with the question asked or are deflected.
Bottom Line:
Not worth your money or time you would be better off finding the dvds the videos are taken from and paying the 2-3$ for the digital copy you would get a better quality and more value that way don't fall for their scam of new updates and content it is false claims. i would rate this site as 0 if their was an option too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Massage-themed network with American models
- Six distinct sites
- Network and sites well organized
- Five sites update weekly
- Lots of viewing options
- TBP discount
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- Very little actual sex
- No independent biller
Bottom Line:
This is my second time visiting this network and most of what I wrote in my 2012 review of Nuru Massage still applies.
The biggest difference with this network now is how it is branded. Back in 2012 I dont recall there being an overall name to the site. If you joined one massage-themed site you got access to the others. While the access part remains the same, the difference is that the network now has a name: Fantasy Massage.
Most of the sites are the same as the last time I reviewed this network, but one has stopped updating and there are two new sites now. The originals are:
Tricky Spa is the newest with only ten scenes uploaded. A new scene is added weekly. The theme here is a little harder edged and more sinister than the other sites. With this site the premise of the scene is that the woman is tricked or coerced into giving the male masseur oral sex and there is some reluctance. Im not sure how long this site will continue to grow since the user votes and comments are far more negative than positive. Not that I can summarize how other members feel about the site, but given the play on coercion it really doesnt fit in well with all the other massage-themed sites here where the interaction is both fun and sexy.
The other new site is Milking Table. It has 59 scenes and updates weekly. The premise of this site is a lot like the others, with a male customer and a female masseuse. The quirk of this site is that the massage table has a hole cut in it where when the male customer lies on his stomach his penis sticks through the hole and the female masseuse gets under the table to milk him. While it does seem a bit odd to watch a woman suck a disembodied cock, an advantage that it does have is that it does away with the lead up to so many cumshots in porn these days where the last of the scene is the male model jerking off for a few minutes before coming on the female model. Here the table requires that the female model be a finisher. Its a quirky site, but I subjectively I like it.
Most of the technical aspects of the network remain the same, and since it was well done before theres nothing wrong with that. The network is logically laid out, the sites are logically laid out, there is a model search page (for individual sites or the full network), there is a search function and there are tags too. The one difference I noticed is there are no longer any WMV files offered. The only file type now offered is MP4 and those are available in 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080 resolutions. Streaming is also available in those same resolutions. I downloaded the 720p files and they come in at 1280x720, 4500kb/s and 29fps. Subjectively they look great on a 24 monitor and look fine on a 50 TV.
The site supports using download managers and I had no problem using one. The download speeds were what I usually see on porn sites.
Some miscellaneous observations:
As before there is a lot more oral action here than vaginal sex.
Anal sex is very rare.
The last time I was a member here it seemed that they were more Asian themed but that has changed too. Asians are certainly represented but the Caucasian models now outnumber them.
The scenes usually feature some of the better known U.S. A-list models working today. Many other massage sites feature Russian or European models so this is a good source to see your favorite American models in this niche.
For other dinosaurs like me out there the network acts a bit wonky with Internet Explorer so be prepared for some minor annoyances or use a different browser.
As with all other sites that are part of the Fame group of site, save your confirmation email as it will provide details on how to cancel. It isnt that they make it hard, but they sure dont make it as quick and easy as using a CC biller.
The bottom line is that this network continues to offer a great value. For the low discount price offered through TBP you get access to hundreds of massage-themed porn scenes with some of the hottest models in the business. The sites are well organized and offer lots of choice for both streaming and downloads. I highly recommend joining if you like this porn niche.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
