Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Stunning Models
-Extreme High Quality Photos
-Very Intimate Close Up
-A lot of Toy / Finger Use
-Frequent Updates (Every 1-2 Days)
-Commenting & Rating is allowed
-Add your own tags
-Ability to rate & follow models
-Ability to view all network sites or individually
-Massive amount of content 3700+ Videos & 3800+ Galleries at time of review.
-Photo set slideshow option
-Next and previous gallery links on each gallery page.
Cons:
-No Guy/Girl Scenes
-No options to view models you have favorited
-Some sets posted as updates are from past.
-Some girls have an alias on network sites. If you are a member of multiple sites in network you may not find all the galleries for same individual.
Bottom Line:
ALS Scan is part of the Metart network so site function and features are the same. However ALS Scan has to be purchased in addition to Metart network or individually. The models are absolutely stunning and majority are young. The ALS stands for All Ladies Shaved so you won't see any bushes. There are some but very few sets that has small amounts of pubic hair. The site is very easy to use, feature rich, and well thought out. The image quality in extremely high quality and very close up. You can literally see when she's dripping wet. I originally joined metart network and was then offered an option to add ALS Scan for a one time lifetime purchase of $500. There is many galleries/videos featuring fingering and toys as well as girl/girl. There are no guy/girl scenes. There is commenting & rating allowed. The users are very positive and informative. You can add your own tags to galleries and videos which making finding things again easy. The model rating system is well thought out and you can follow a model which gets you an email anytime they have an update. Unfortunately there is not a page to view all the models you have favorited. I also love that when viewing a gallery you can start a slideshow with options on speed and image size. There is also links to the previous and next galleries which makes browsing very easy. There are also links to download the video and/or download a zip file of the gallery.
Really the only thing I don't like about the site you can't view a list of models that you have a favorited. If you are a member of multiple sites on the metart network you may find the same girl has an alias. It would be convenient if the sites in the network chose one of the other.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Over 500 girls to check out
Plenty of resolution options for pics and videos
PU discount is always nice
Decent download speed
Search function (see con)
Some might like the rating system
Cons:
Model names not in file names
Search function limitations
Lots of video without a matching photo set
Pic sets for a BTS video no matching full video?
Only preview for video is a small, fast moving gif
Very little diversity - mostly skinny white girls
Repetitive scenes
Bottom Line:
This wasn't my first time in on this site but it was a good while back and I don't remember it being this bothersome. The only big positives I can say about the site is that they don't feature girls with a ton of tattoos, piercings or breast implants and the 4K video looks really good. After that, the site really left me scratching my head.
I don't understand why the video and picture sections are exclusive of each other and yet come together when doing searches. Searching with a keyword/tag brings up both video and pictures when all I'm after are the videos. I also found that the search function seems to be based on existing tags, so you don't always get results. I think a page with all the tags would end that issue.
Having to manually add a model's name to each file is annoying.
It'd be nice to get an idea of what's in the video before downloading it. There is a link below each video that says Photos, but all that's there are four versions of the cover for the video. Why? What about a photoset? And that gif preview? I use a 43 inch TV as a monitor and it's still difficult to see what's what. I found myself deleting quite a few scenes pretty much right after I downloaded 'em and checked 'em out. A better preview would help them save some server bandwidth.
I've never bothered with rating anything. I really don't care who is the most popular with the masses.
As was mentioned in a comment for the site, some of the stuff is just plain weird, like the embroidery hoop insertions.
I'll admit that it could just be that I'm starting to find all porn getting repetitive but here it just seems so formulaic. Shower? Drop the towel, soak up, go to the vibrator. Outdoor scene? Drop the clothes, show off in a bunch of poses, go to the vibrator or some bizarre insertion.
As a bottom line, I'd say it was easily worth the $5 I dropped on it, and it might be a good one and done site for someone who's never checked it out, but I doubt I'd go back unless I see they revamped the site. I only rated it as high as I did because the video quality is really good. That'll go along way to maintaining the quality when I chop up/cut out the weird parts with my video editor.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Consistently one of my top sites
- Slim, pretty, sexy, cute and shaven. There’s a chance that’s all you need to know.
- Technical quality has always been a strength for ALS. Videos are HD or 4K. You’re going to see every pubic hair stubble.
- There’s no dropoff in the quality of pictures. You can download them and they are topping out at 4000 long end
- Fun videos, it’s an unofficial trademark of ALS videos. The models enjoy themselves and there are lots of genuine smiles. Watch the BTS videos to see for yourself.
- Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
- Can also be accessed as part of the Met Art Network and is to me the best site on Met Art’s Network.
Cons:
- Just don’t join to see big booties and boobs. These are slim models. I too prefer bigger built models but ALS Scan is an exception for me.
– The more extreme scenes may be a turn-off for some
Bottom Line:
ALS Scan is likely one of the most respected pornsites. It has become known for the happy models, the big smiles, the laughter and everything you don’t expect from a pornsite with fists being stuck up in the tiny models. There’s a constant playfulness in the scenes and though mentioned many times before, the beach vacation scenes are still worthy of a spot in anyone’s best scenes collection. Those scenes showed that ALS Scan knew they had something special going on with their on-screen chemistry with models.
I once made the comment that I wondered if Met-Art realized putting ALS Scan on their network, bumped the Met-Art sites down a notch. I’m not for sure Met-Art minds since ALS Scan brought charisma that Met-Art lacked. The models try their best to keep a girl next door look but that only makes them even more attractive.
The standard scene on ALS Scan is solo masturbation. Somewhere along the way, they decided to work a helper into some of the scenes and that was a major boost. Seeing the helper being as shy as the masturbating model only adds tension for those watching it. Good tension. I have found myself pulling for the helper to jam another finger in the model … hold the lube. Make her moan a little more.
Pictures are a major part of ALS Scan’s site. Their pictures are large and the zip files often have over 200 pictures in each one. You can download videos and photosets to your heart’s content.
If you’re at all familiar with any of the Met-Art sites, the navigation will be familiar to you. That was one of the biggest positives of ALS Scan moving to Met-Art’s network. The navigation and layout of the site received an overhaul. The site, despite its huge size, is easy to navigate and search.
The numbers for the site show just how big it is. There are almost 4,000 videos and 4,000 photosets. That’s a lot of shaved beavers.
This is still a site that makes it difficult to find cons. One could say the older scenes with the OB/Gyn “tools†were not that sexy but those only make up a small part of the entire collection. Maybe you could complain about watching one pretty, young woman shaving another pretty, young woman’s pubic hair but that goes away when the one shaving starts licking the other.
This content is what men like to think really happens each time two women get around each other and we want to be their top voyeur. ALS Scan lets you be that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Young, slim, pretty models doing all sorts of things to themselves.
464 models on the site and these are mostly pro if not all pro models. I don’t know a lot of models by name, but recognize most of these.
There are an incredible 3,250 videos and 3,494 photo sets.
They are averaging an update per day, these do alternate between photo set update one day, video the next and they are not of the same model.
The videos and photo sets are downloadable and I have not seen anything about limits.
The quality of the videos and photos is very good.
Cons:
These young women look more like I do and there does not seem to be a break in slim, small boobs, small butts, they are also all shaved.
It is an older site and you can see a difference in the performance quality by the models. It is not a big difference, but if you watch an older scene it seems better than the newer scenes.
Bottom Line:
I strayed too far from my comfort zone last month. While I do not consider myself a lesbian or bicurious even; I do enjoy watching women masturbate. I believe it is a deep fantasy in my head they can see me too. The scenes on here change a lot if you scan through the years. Most of the newer scenes are fingering, small the average size dildo, standard vibrator or the wand-type vibrator. The older scenes are more explicit and you see more fisting, larger dildos and the models -- in my opinion -- pushing themselves to their limits. It is not really a complaint. It is just a difference I notice.
The women are mostly all attractive, cute ones, some are very pretty, some are gorgeous. Can I imagine this is what I looked like nearly 20 years ago? There are some lesbian scenes and I wish there were more. The lesbian scenes on here are very good. I did as other reviewers mentioned and checked out the island vacation videos. I would pay for a site with just those type of scenes on it. Those are excellent.
This site is a technological wonder in its quality. The photos I have downloaded have all been at a minimum of 4000 plus x 2500 plus, with some being even bigger. The picture quality is good enough to impress me and I am not usually into pictures. The models make the picture sets good. They seem to all be into teasing and being playful, then turning to a dirtier, naughtier side later in the sets. One of my all-time favorite sites -- Nubiles, could take a few lessons in photographing young women from this site.
The videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p and separate WMV and DIVX/AVI versions too. I believe the photo sets are consistently better than the videos. The videos are much better than the softcore sites I am used to, but I am thinking this -- young, slim, small boobs, small butt, all shaved, combined with just solo masturbation makes the videos seem similar. They do have some solo videos where they do more with the way the scenes play out, but it was -- again, in my opinion, better in the older scenes. I have the same complaints with the other top softcore sites too.
The site is huge. There is no way I could go through all this content in a month. Combining photo sets with videos puts the total number at over 6,700. This is one of those sites I would not complain about if they were not updating.
The Behind the Scenes videos helps that video number out, but this goes back to the photo sets being as good as the videos. The Behind the Scenes videos are as good as the regular videos. You can tell this site cares about their quality and the models enjoying themselves. It shows even more in those Behind the Scenes videos.
This site really impresses me, but I would like to see more lesbian scenes and more of those vacation scenes. Something else I really liked about it is most of the models have a lot of scenes/photo sets. I believe that shows best by looking at the total number of models at 464 with 3,200 videos and 3,400 photo sets. Some of the models have more than 10 videos and 10 photo sets on here. It is interesting to me to watch how the models change from scene to scene. I do not think they film all the scenes of each model on the same day or in a week even. It looks more like they bring models back months, even years later and you can see how much the model has progressed in her confidence. One of my favorite sites. I will have to watch for a year special on this one.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Updated:
11-15-2006:48pm (Update History) Reason: I failed to copy all of my Bottom Line comments before the site ate them as it always does. So I had to recreate them.
Pros:
Excellent photography of cute - mainly white - babes.
If you like a site with a distinctive personality, this is definitely one since all photography is done or directed by the site owner, Alex, who also does a blog on the site with sample photos from recent (often that week's) shoots for members to give feedback on that often guides when a model's material will be posted to the site and which sets will be posted to the site when.
MANY of the U.S. models are exclusive to the site or have done very few shoots other than for this site.
If you like cute blonde small breasted babes with their pubes shaved masturbating with large dildos, or using odd toys or speculums, this is the site for you.
Updates have kept up in the COVID-19 era - every day in the past couple of months there has been a new posting of a vid or a photo shoot - not an easy task when it's 1 guy behind everything - a few are posts of shoots from long ago, but not many.
The Met-Art site design is a great improvement.
Cons:
My frustrations with this site are personal. This was my absolute favorite site at one time. That was quite a while ago and there are 2 reasons for this - one that is a choice of the site and the other was a result of economics. a) Same-ness of models - This site is cute small-breasted white girls - period. OCCASIONALLY a Latina like Rachel Rivers will sneak in. VERY occasionally an Asian babe like Vina Sky will sneak in. But that's it. In an era when W4B, as 1 great example, is finding scads of new really hot Latinas, and when there are lots of great-looking young Black & Asian models working, the lack of variety of models on this site is a really bad thing.
b) The other thing that really hurt the excitement level on this site tremendously was the end of their trips. Back in the early 2000's, ALS Scan would take a group of models on trips to the Bahamas or elsewhere to shoot for a week - and the material there was the best & most exciting on the site. The last trip was 2009
Bottom Line:
I'm ending my subscription to ALS Scan because I'm no longer excited by the site for the 2 reason in my cons. The end of the trips was not their fault - it was an economic decision they felt they had to make.
Selling the site to MetArt kept the site going and enabled the site to have a MUCH-needed redesign, but it didn't bring back those trips, unfortunately. It's too bad because they're no longer creating the awesome, fun, exciting material that the mix of girls on the trips created. if you are a new member of the site, I can't urge you enough to check out the ALS/Vacations section of the site - easily found from the home page. There is a ton of awesome material they did on those trips. The only trips they kept up - since they're all about the cute young small-breasted white babes - are the trips each year to Budapest & Prague to find and shoot with hot young Euro-babes. Why they have never developed relationships with agents that could find hot young Latinas for them to shoot with or hot young Black or Asian women (add a trip to the Philippines or Thailand, for crying out loud) is utterly beyond me.
Stats - the site currently lists 454 models. There are various ways to sort - most recent, most popular, alphabetical. The site shows 3,434 galleries - most galleries have over 200 images. It's easy to scroll through the images, which look great on the site.
Recent photo shoots are available to download in various sizes. the large zips are in the 600+ mb range and the photos download as 3233 x 4850 pixels.
There are 3,171 films on the site. Both photo shoots & films are categorized as to masturbation scenes, girl/girl (maybe 1 per month), BTS/photo shoot, interview or remastered if that's the case - the site goes back to about 2000. Recent videos are downloadable in 7 options from 270 p to 4K. This is all on Met Art's site design so it all works well, including the older material. You can search by model name, or most popular, or most recent, etc.
For collectors, the zips of photo shoots give a ton of info - site name, date set was posted, name of set & model name. For videos, they just give the name of the site and the set name.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large selection of models (440)
-Big selection of videos (3008) dating back to 2004
-Updated often – at least every week
-Blog updated every few days – get to know the models more intimately
-Live Cam option
-Artistically shot.
Cons:
-Website hard to navigate
-Not organised into niches/kinks
-No B/G shoots only masturbation and G/G
-Have to pay extra for Staff Selections
Bottom Line:
ALS Scan is part of a collective of sites under the name of MetArt Network. They have been online since around 2004 and have a considered, artistic approach to erotica and porn. The 3008 “films†on the site (which is quite a lot considering there is little to no variation in niches/kinks; they have masturbation and G/G videos available) are shot using a cinematic 2.35:1 aspect ratio giving the shoots a more artistic feel for the viewer, but the set design in some of these shoots are a let down. The models are young, slim girls mostly from America but they have some Eastern European girls as well. There is not much of a spectrum when it comes to the models looks/size but there are around 440 different girls on the site to look at; so if its your kind of girl then you’ll have plenty to see. The videos are updated at least every week which is great! The only down point being if they update with a “Staff Selection†you still have to pay more on top of your membership to download it. The quality is high class for all shoots; and easily downloadable. Every few days the Blog is updated letting you into the upcoming news with new girls and their interests and information about them. This is great because it allows you to get to know the girls more and paired with the “Behind the Scenes†videos you reall get an insight in the porn industry and who the models really are.
The pricing is a monthly payment of €19.99, 1 month for €29.99 or a yearly payment of €8.33 a month. Using the site also gives you free trial access to a number of other sites including Erotic Beauty and Domai; which are all part of the wider MetArt Network family. ALS Scan is a good softcore porn site if you like slim to skinny, young, American (some Eastern European) girls. I think that their approach to porn is positive and promotes an artistic, considered future in porn; and they give to charity too! Having said that, the site could use a navigation re-design and variety in kinks; more than just masturbation and G/G. But overall it’s a great site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A lot of slim, shaven, very cute, girl next door type models. Many are pros without their makeup.
2,959 videos, 3,276 photo sets and 435 models.
Averages over 1 update per day, interviews are rare, interviews are rare but are included, also remastered sets of older sets, most are solo and lesbian scenes.
They work on the girl-crush meter with models like Vina Skyy and Allie Addison.
Site is simple to use. Easy to join and cancel.
Photo sets, at times, trump the videos, with extreme close-ups in huge resolution that shows how wet the models are.
Cons:
I find the models to be an overall mixed lot. It's subjective, Vina Skyy and Allie Addison are two of my current favorites, but there are just as many models I don't even check out.
Some of the extreme penetrations take away from the eroticism of the content. Vina has a set where she "whisks" her pussy with a kitchen whisk. It's not solid and it's wiry.
Bottom Line:
This is my second time joining this site. I didn't review it the previous time. I think it's way up there in the teen category and with the slimmer models, but I'm not always in the mood for the cutesy teens.
I decided to join again when I saw they have new content of Vina Skyy and Allie Addison, two models that couldn't possibly be more different, but I have a huge girl-crush on both of them. Vina has 7 videos, including the much anticipated ride on the Sybian and 7 photo sets. Allie has 5 videos and 5 photo sets. They are not the only models I joined for, but when I join a site this big, I try to make sure there are some new sets of my girl-crush models and then look through the archives.
I like that they are remastering old, popular sets as it's helping me find some models I probably wouldn't have looked far enough back to find.
The videos have a broad range of masturbation. Toys, fingers, gynecological tools, kitchen utensils, fruits, vegetables, Sybian, Magic Wands, they should work on getting royalties for these products!
The majority of the scenes are solo and many of the lesbian scenes are only so-so. Others have mentioned the tropical trips and I finally downloaded those. Those are some of the best lesbian scenes I have seen as they look to be improvised. I mentioned in the pros that I believe some of the photo sets are better than the videos. The photo sets are deep and even engaging, some are in the 200 range of photos, others go as high as nearing 400. These are not screen captures and you can tell good care is put into getting the most explicit views.
Something I believe this site offers that others don't is the girls are not all made up, it's not a glamour site even though some sets might look that way. I have seen models on here that I'm familiar with on other sites and realized how much I like them even if I didn't before.
the video quality is great with 4K on newer videos and 1080p or 720p on sets as far back as 2008. The photo sets besides being large in quantity of photos come in zip downloads and in their largest size are 3000x4500, the Vina Skyy photos were enough reason for me to join. I don't think I've ever seen a model that gets so naturally creamy and wet in just a photo shoot.
The cancellation process is as simple as setting your account not to rebill and you also have favorites where you can store your favorite models or scenes. I am happier with the site than I expected to be. I sometimes find these cute model sites to be more annoying than arousing, but they have enough of those cute models that are very good at being arousing to make it a great site. Something I will end with is something I have mentioned in other reviews. I like that they have less than 500 models, but have over 6,000 videos/photo sets combined. It gives you a chance to get multiple sets of the models you like and makes it feel like they are selective about their models.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
A variation of solo-based sites with some extreme insertions, outdoor scenes and cute girls.
Some of the models make me feel old, but that is okay. The models on this site are slim, few maybe none have implants and they do seem to enjoy themselves.
The site has improved by leaps and bounds in how it works. I was a member here many years ago. It used to be hard to find anything. It now is one of the simplest sites to use.
Most of the models have more than one scene or photoset. There are 424 models total with nearly 3,000 videos and over 3,000 photosets. I like when a site does this instead of having a new model in every scene.
The impromptu lesbian scenes are my favorite lesbian scenes I have seen.
Cons:
The sign-up and entrance as a new member could be easier. You have a whole page of other sites the Met-Art network offers to pick as add-on sites. There is a link to bypass it, but it is one line of text compared to 8 or more large photos for the other sites.
The staff selection picks are on here just like on Sex Art and they are the same scenes. You have to pay extra for those.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined ALS Scan, I thought ALS was the name of the producer of the content. ALS means All Ladies Shaved.
The content is mostly solo. My favorite scenes on here are the ones with more than one person, but the other person or multiple people are not fully interacting. Those scenes give you the feeling the model just decided to masturbate even with clothed people sitting around her. It is a very basic idea, but it is not basic once it enters the viewer's mind.
I even watch the behind the scenes -- scenes. Unlike most behind the scenes videos, ALS shows every step of their filming. There are many that show the assistant (female) touching the model a little more than needed. It gives more of a look into the model's personality and even shows how much she likes being touched even if not in a porn scene.
I would guess the producer added those behind the scenes videos with extra touching with the plan of one day having a behind the scenes video to turn into a full blown porn scene. If they did not plan that they probably claim they did since it does happen.
There's something different about seeing an assistant ask if she can kiss the model that adds a lot to all of their scenes. It makes me wonder how much of this extracurricular activity goes on in all porn. My thinking is not often. You can see and feel that the ALS models are giving genuine, horny performances. I want to apply for the head baby oil applier! ALS might not even realize the female fantasy they are creating for women viewers. I know I would be a lot more likely to rub baby oil all over a cute, nude woman than jumping right into a lesbian scene.
I am not usually a person that views pictures or downloads them, but one of my very first internet searches for porn -- about 15 years ago, brought up a photo set from ALS Scan. They have some of the most natural and unaltered photos. Their outdoor photosets are life-like. You can download the photosets in zip files.
The videos can be as simple as a woman masturbating on the bed to masturbating by the pool. They use various items including those from gynecology and what I consider extreme dildos, but those are not as common here as on sites labeled as extreme penetration. You will also see some fisting. It does not appeal to me, but like the extreme dildos, it is not that common.
The videos can be downloaded from 270p up to 4K. I tried to get a count on the amount of 4K videos, but received a page that said, "Page not found". The option to see only 4K videos seems to be broken or missing. In my browsing, I have seen 4K labeled videos back as far as 2015. The quality of their videos is very good.
My favorite scenes are the impromptu lesbian scenes, the casting scenes and the ones with the non-participating clothed people visible. I don't like feeling like the only one watching the model.
A month is never enough. I usually join it for 3 months at a time. Their streaming player is one of the better ones I have used. I stream the behind the scenes ones to check for any extra action in them. I would recommend it to anyone looking for fun, believable solo scenes with added bonuses of lesbian and even a few group scenes. I have no comment on the male with female scenes. There are not many of them. I haven't watched any of them. Those seem out of place on this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Most of the models are fairly attractive and (at least to me) relatively unknown -- but they also have plenty of top billing models ready to play with themselves for you.
Over 34+ pages of videos and 53+ pages of photos (60 vids/photos per page) - and they are updating on a regular basis.
BTS videos of some of the photo shoots are nice.
NO download limits (at least from what I can tell) and downloads are relatively fast.
Video file sizes are reasonable with HD usually topping out at around 1.6GB -- 720p is usually much lower at around 500MB.
Cons:
MASTURBATION/SOLO videos only. There may have been a small handful of B/G content, but it was extremely rare (and probably a BONUS from another site). There are a few G/G scenes, but nothing I found particularly interesting.
Content after awhile becomes identical -- different girls, same situations (but isn't most porn?).
Bottom Line:
Honestly, I'm not a big fan of SOLO content unless it includes something extra to spice it up... ALS Scan does not... It's just girls masturbating (some pretty quietly) and that's just not very exciting to me.
BUT! If you ARE into that, you're in luck, because ALS Scan has PLENTY of content for you. With over 34+ pages of videos and over 53+ pages of photos, you're bound to find something you enjoy.
I'd recommend this site to anymore just beginning their porn adventures as nothing here is off-putting or offensive and to anyone who enjoys sitting back with a nice cup of tea and watching soft young girls play with themselves.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Making a strong case for the best photo and video porn site.
- The amount of content combined by their current update pace continues to shame even some networks.
- Another of those sites that has a farm growing pretty teens. It's like they never run out.
- Softer than most hardcore sites but harder than most softcore sites, if that makes sense.
- Still updates daily and has been around since 1996. I might make an uncomfortable joke in the bottom line about that.
- If you like slender models this is the site for you.
- Download speeds are very good, about 75% of my max.
- Met-Art boosted the navigation and site design.
- Very high quality throughout the site will cover that in BL.
- Some variety thanks to "helpers" in some otherwise solo scenes, girl/girl and girl group in the vacation scenes. But solo is the focus.
- Very good at capturing the girls personalities which is a lost art in porn these days.
Cons:
- There's so little to complain about that I'm going to have to nitpick. I think all of the Met-Art ran sites are frustrating at sign-up because they transfer you to the login page and send your password to your email. Meaning, if you don't know your password yet, you can't sign in and you get stuck in that lock-up screen "sign-in" box that shakes when you get it wrong.
- Same complaint I've always had and that is while I like slender models as much as anyone, I also like some variety.
Bottom Line:
ALS Scan and ALS Angels are two of my favorite sites of all-time. The funny part is I don't and haven't ever preferred shaven women but these sites require it. I prefer a trimmed triangle, airstrip.
I keep coming back to this site because I still am steeped in solo porn. It's been my favorite since 2004. Most solo sites are tame, very soft and that's even more true in 2018. The difference now is you can't find more than a dozen or so sites with high quality content that is solo. Even when the competition was much more populated than now, ALS Scan was one of my top 3 sites in the genre. I will say that ALS Angels can outscore it for me personally, but ALS Scan has obvious advantages that can't be ignored like the amount of content, update frequency and much improved navigation/site design.
Kind of a funny complaint, I can't count the models because they have so many that they've gone to an alphabetical listing (would take forever) and a "top models" filter that shows a couple hundred. They continue to do things that make me shake my head in disbelief, like:
Daily updates. Shocking enough in this day of age of networks with 36 sites barely releasing one update per day but there are days like February 2, 2018 that had ... 16 casting updates, in one day. Your average porn site these days would release those over 16 days. Some might say those casting scenes are tame since it's mostly a woman taking her clothes off and little else but it's still a photo shoot and for someone who likes seeing a woman in her regular clothes, then naked, it's very good.
I try to always mention the collector side when reviewing the ALS sites since they have been around a long time and have a lot of models many of us have forgotten. A couple of favorites here are Alana (Anetta Keys) and Zuzana (Zuzana Z.). And to show how much content they do have for some models, Zuzana has 46 videos/photo sets. Considering their site has enough models to split their "top models" into a top 200, it kind of gives you an idea of how big the overall site is.
One of those objective opinions I usually avoid. The ALS sites are two of the only sites that I do watch the Behind the Scenes videos from. I know I've groveled over the ALS Angels BTS of Regina Ice becoming genuinely horny but ALS Scan has similar too.
Listing the numbers would take me a month. While I think their navigation is very good, it's not the best in the world for writing a review. If you click "movies" it takes you to a page with 60 videos on it and there's 30 pages of those 60 video pages. But that only goes back to July 2009. If you click "updates" you see that the content is dated back to 2006 AND there's an archive too.
My thinking is they're showcasing the videos that have 1080p options but from what I've seen they have 1080p dating back to January 2008. On the other side, they do have some 4K in the newer videos but I'm not for sure how they're doing that since one update will have it and one won't. Still, over 2,000 videos in 1080p.
They've always stood out to me because of their picture sets. They not only will push the 5000 long end side of pictures but also will include anywhere from 150-500 photos in a set. These are not screencaps from the videos, they are separate photo shoot photos.
Which leads to another objective opinion. I prefer their shooting style as they don't go and try and to create this porn looking area for the photos or videos. The makeup is light or natural and the clothes really look like what the model most likely showed up in. I used to prefer glam and do still like it but I prefer this more natural style now.
If you like slender models and you've never been a member, you should plan on staying longer than a month or else you're going to be overwhelmed with the amount of content. The scenes are typically longer than a lot of solo sites as there's usually a full strip and tease, some talking, and by the way, ALS won me over way back in 2008 with a scene with Anetta Keys. She, like many Euro models, usually won't talk much but they had her talking more than I've seen and they do that as well as anyone. The only sites I've seen that have as good of a relationship with the models are Twistys (when Shap was there, not anymore), Pacino's Adventures (think it's shut down now), one I've mentioned before and who has worked ALS, Zoliboy's old site and last is FTV. You miss out on that interaction with the model on 98% of sites these days. I thought the recent Liza Rowe one was cute when she noticed bees. While it won't top Eve Angel's once slapping of a fly on her thigh, while masturbating, it's still fun to see the normal moments.
One cross-sale to avoid but it's easy to avoid and it's to Met-Art, they would take care of it if you missed it. My score is only lower than before because I've adjusted my scoring scale. For me, it's the best of the slender solo models sites, so if one of mine is higher it's just because I've not updated it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge quantity of material.
Many popular models here.
The girls are all very young, say, under 25. Newer videos are very good and in HD.
Newer photo sets come in high resolution.
Mostly solo/lesbian site but some newer B/G scenes.
The girls appear to be having genuine fun.
Sets are dated and are available all the way back to 2004.
Sets are scored
One update per day.
Navigation is good.
Search function is good.
Cons:
About 1 in 10-14 releases are actually re-posts or remastered sets of older material dating back as far as 2001...OK if you are a first time member but not cool if you are returning.
The narrow range of girl types, sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes the site a little monotonous after a while.
The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here.
Bottom Line:
I last reviewed this site back in 2012. Some things have changed since then. Most, not so much.
About 4900 photo sets/videos
Several thousand models
1 set a day (many recycled)
Combination of US and Eastern European models
Most videos are of photo shoots
Solo girl, lesbian and fetish sets
ALSScan is primarily a lesbian and off-beat fetish site. Nearly every girl is young, petite, small breasted and, of course, shaved. Many of the girls from older sets and some from newer ones are truly beautiful. A few headliners like Kimmy Granger, Gina Gerson, Dakota Skye, Caprice, Malena Morgan and Franzeska, are easily recognizable from other sites even without much make-up.
ALSScan "screens" a lot of models, evidenced by the proliferation of casting shoots throughout the sets, but only a small percentage of these girls are above average looking. The really great looking ones have sets that are re-posted, which is serious cheating. There is a lot of new content, but the way the site re-uses content, you can't really tell if it is new or not. Considering there is no recycled content anywhere else within the Met-Art network, this sin takes about 10 points off of my score for the site. This would be a much better site if they stopped recycling content.
But the success of the site must mean that many people like the signature items they provide, even if some of it is recycled.
Until recently, there were NO boy/girl sex scenes. None. Lots of girl/girl scenes, though. Just since 2016, a very small number of B/G scenes have appeared. In typical ALS style, though, many of these scenes are unusual in that the guy inserts something into the girl, like a bottle, her fist, his fist, a vegetable or dildo, before he inserts himself into her. There are only a couple of B/G scenes so far.
Practically every model gets fisted at some point. If you like that, this is paradise.
There is an odd fascination with otherwise unviewable areas of the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uterus looks like. Many models agree to use an embroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the vagina or rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it neither sexy, nor flattering. In a word, this stuff makes the models clinical.
Just about every model has to pee at some point. The photographers show you exactly when that moment is.
Ladies, care to have your nipples, clitoris or entire vagina vacuum pumped? Yep, they do that a lot here!
The first time I saw a set where a model put a lollipop in her vagina I thought it was cool. That was about 200 lollipops ago. Now I find myself wondering what flavor the lollipop is.
This is not a glam site. As such, the girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt.
To be fair, each set, new or old, starts out with the girl wearing a skimpy outfit or ALS signature tiny bikini and the girl undresses, lubes up and spreads. it can be quite nice up to here. Then they break out the bottles, vegetables, fists, vacuums, inflators, speculums and embroidery hoops. You might like it, at least at first. In one video, Gina Gerson uses an inflator dildo and the photographer keeps saying "Are you OK?" That about sums up my thoughts when I see the stuff they insert into the girls.
Alsscan has a sister site called allsangels that is not within the Met Art network. The "Director" has no qualms with showing you a set of girls in his blog and picking out the more attractive girls to send over to ALSANGELS in an effort to sell you membership there. Models at THAT site include Lucy Li, Dillon Harper, August Ames.....all it does for me is piss me of that these good looking, curvier girls are there instead of here.
The photographers here have a tremendous rapport with the models as the models are usually having a lot of fun. I think this is because the models are not forced to please the camera so much. (heck, they hardly even LOOK at the camera.) Instead they are encouraged to please themselves and any other girls that happen to be nearby..and perhaps they are encouraged to experiment, which they do.
There is a section where some of the girls go to a tropical island. Once there, they run around naked and have sex with any girl they want. Unfortunately, the last time anybody went to one of these tropical islands was in 2009...doesn't stop them from re-posting them as new daily sets though.
Bottom line: I've been to this site about 10 times since 2001. For the last few times, the material has been so similar and so many sets have been recycled that I can no longer tell what is new and what is not. It is a great site to visit once. Just once. I keep forgetting
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
--attractive models, usually
--high-quality photo techniques
--decent collection of models
Cons:
--more clinical than erotic
--the site emphasizes youthful (legal) females, which means lots of pigtails and the like, which is silly at times
Bottom Line:
I admit it: I've never understood why guys go gaga over this site. Yeah, I know the girls look younger and cuter, and they're willing to push the limits, but too often this site turns models into sideshow freaks, using odd contraptions and (occasionally) human assistants to show us just how far a vagina can be stretched. So hot. Not. Future gynecologists probably benefit from the site, but this isn't erotica, folks. In fact, in most photos, the models look anything but turned on: they're amused or speechless or bewildered. Similarly, I'm speechless and bewildered, too -- by the over-the-top reviews of ALS.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- ALS Scan is a site about young women which adds some believable, more life-like scenarios than your average porn site does.
- I've joked about it before and continue to feel like ALS has a factory somewhere off the grid that produces these innocent, pretty, girl-next door types who like being naked.
- I can't say for sure how much the old owner (Met-Art managed) is still involved, but nearly all of the casting videos I've watched have him talking in them. And that's a big plus (See BL)
- Daily updates, usually photo set one day, video the next with occasional BTS and interview videos thrown in.
- Long time ALS fans will like the PU price. I joined this site, 17 times, from 2006-2011 at $29.95 each time. One of the few sites a year membership is worth considering.
- Boy/girl scenes also show up some. For many years it was just a solo/lesbian site.
- High quality all-around (numbers in BL).
- Site has a personality. There's a fun, relaxed vibe with most of the content.
Cons:
- Any site like this one can become repetitive.
- Several longtime PU members didn't like the use of gynecological instruments and close-ups.
Bottom Line:
Admittedly, I always preferred ALS Angels to ALS Scan, but it was solely based on ALS Angels having curvier models. ALS Scan's technical quality was better even back then. This is based on how ALS Angels operated, if a girl was "too curvy" for ALS Scan she ended up on ALS Angels. What's too curvy? Eve Angel. All 5'6" 130 pounds of her. Looking at ALS Scan's current models they still prefer the smaller, slimmer girls. Back then the webmaster Alex was fair to the curvier girls by having ALS Angels for them, but I never really understood how a woman with 36C boobs could be considered "too curvy". That at least should let you know you're not going to get a lot of curvy models here.
What you do get are lots of slimmer, sportier, playful girls. I mentioned in the pros that I hear Alex's name in the casting videos and believe he's a very important part of ALS' success. Everyone seems to enjoy working with him and being around him. His interviews with models are top-notch, maybe the best in the business (sorry Zoliboy). The models almost always are relaxed during their scenes and I do believe you get much more emotion and enjoyment from the models when they are comfortable.
The casting videos are worth mentioning as I hadn't seen them recently. They're filled with new talent looking to make a good first impression. Though the casting videos do not have any type of sexual action in them. They do have full nudity.
The regular solo scenes on ALS are some of the best you'll find, though you will run into some extreme insertions and gynecological closeups. As much as I like lesbian scenes, my favorite girl/girl scenes in all of porn are here on ALS. I think it started innocent enough. ALS has always had a female assistant or two, but unlike other sites, they will work this assistant into a solo scene by a model. The assistant will then help the model lube up, insert something they normally couldn't insert and even a little licking, kissing, fingering.
The boy/girl scenes are mostly misses for me, but that's because I don't join ALS to see boy/girl scenes. Though I shouldn't say much since these scenes are pretty rare. I'm only counting roughly one per month boy/girl scene.
ALS Scan has always been a site with high technical quality standards. That hasn't changed and unlike a lot of sites these days, they still give you a huge amount of photos per photo set. You rarely see a set with less than 200 photos and some go as high as 700 photos, with 300-350 being an average. These photo sets are available in downloadable zips and come in 3 qualities: low (1000 high end), medium (2000 high end), large (4500 high end).
There's roughly 1,000 videos in 1080p quality. Some of the newer videos are also available in 4k, though I honestly don't download those since I don't have a 4k monitor nor do I want to start investing in more hard drives to store all those huge files in.
The biggest plus you will see with Met-Art's management of ALS Scan is in the navigation. Used to you would open a page that had tiny thumbnail headshots of every single model on the site. Now the preview pictures are larger and there's easy to use and find "photography", "latest updates", "videos" tabs at the top of the page as well as a model directory.
It's worth searching back into the older content to find all of the "beach" trips, where webmaster Alex takes several models to a beach and they record everything from playing around on the beach to masturbation in front of the other models while the other models eat breakfast. You get a lot of unscripted, humorous moments in those.
I still believe Met-Art made the biggest and best impact at Viv Thomas, but ALS Scan didn't really need a lot done to it. Overall, I think it's the best site in the Met-Art network and brings the best of "girl" porn you can get. There's plenty of uniqueness and creativity as well. From body-painting in public to public flashing to just plain nudity and masturbation. It's those female assistant one becoming involved ones that I like best, but truthfully, there's hardly ever a scene I don't like.
The cons are nothing more than me nitpicking. One that I didn't mention is the wrong update dates on scenes. I saw one yesterday that said it was released in 2010, but the "cover" of the scene said "Budapest 2007". Again, it's hardly worth complaining about.
One other thing to mention that could bother some is the use of remastered old scenes as new updates. These don't happen that much and I personally like them.
One of my all-time favorite sites and it's one of the few that continues to impress me consistently. Highly recommended.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
ALS has been setting the bar high for years.
-all models are shaved and otherwise natural
-over 500,000 pics in zips
-resolution 2000x3000
-overall amount of content is overwhelming
-lost count of videos, but I'd guess over 3000
-most videos in 1080P
-mostly solo and g/g
-subjects also include b/g, peeing, dildos, speculums, fisting, anal insertions, anal fisting and lots of outdoors and BTS
-newly redesigned and searchable website with tags (90% of peeing content was tagged correctly, I looked at everything on their site and tagged the remaining 10%. You are welcome.)
-one, sometimes two updates daily
They are remastering lots of their older stuff. How cool is it to see those favorite pics of yours from years ago in more detail than ever before? This is one of the coolest things going on at ALS right now. I give them so much credit for staying true to their roots, and for putting in the real effort and investment that it takes to do this.
Cons:
I honestly can't come up with any cons here.
Some past reviews have mentioned their introduction of b/g content as a con, while other have considered it a plus. I'm pretty neutral on it personally. To those who feel that ALS is straying from their roots with b/g content, I will say that is not true. ALS has done b/g content in their early days too, including one video with Mia that I'm thinking of, it was just rare back then.
The merger with Met Art was totally a good thing, all concerns regarding that have not played out, and they have kept everything that made them unique and great while totally modernizing their site.
You may notice some of the oldest archived sets appear thinned out. This is not new, they were thinned out on their old site too, actually those old archived sets were just samples of what was once available on CDGirlsOnline.com. As part of their renovation with Met Art, ALS had actually brought more pics back online than they had before.
Bottom Line:
ALS - All Ladies Shaved. I obviously love this site, because I have given it my top score. If you look at all of the sites that I have scored close to 100%, they all have one thing in common - they are large, high quality networks that are run like the best of the small operations. This could not be more true of ALS - they go to every length possible to please their customers. Usually, the "Bottom Line" is the section where I go into objective detail about a site. With ALS, I will ask you to forgive me for being a bit subjective, because I would rather tell you the story of my own personal experience. ALS is a site that dates back to 1996, just about my earliest days ever seeing online porn. I didn't find them in the 1990's though, they first came to my attention in the early 2000's. I remember that ALS's pics were the first that I ever saw in 1200x800 resolution back around 2003, and I knew they had just raised the bar on everyone else. Those 1200x800 ALS pics still look amazing today. Back in those early days, I got what ALS pics I could from TGP's and the like because I was not in a position to get a full membership. Over the years, I lost many files, first due to an ill conceived idea to delete my collection, and later to a hard drive crash, but ALS's pics were among the ones that I remembered the most.
So I finally joined ALS a few months ago, hoping to rebuild my old collection and check out all of their new stuff too. I was impressed with the amount of content on ALS's site. They are one of those sites that you really can just get lost in, due to the overwhelming amount of pics and videos. ALS has a very distinctive style. It goes much beyond just having all of their models shaved. They love to do shoots at the beach and by the pool on bright, sunny days. Their models are young and slender with natural breasts and few if any tattoos. They always look like they're having a lot of fun too, and you can see lots of behind the scenes videos where the models are just having a good time with each other and with the staff. At the same time, with all of this lighthearted fun going on, ALS can really push the boundaries. ALS is the only site I can think of where the models seem to be having such a fun time while doing things as extreme as fisting, using speculums, and putting clamps (the ALS "dreamcatcher") on their pussies. Of course, there is lots of peeing too. So, there I was, downloading all of this great stuff from ALS, when I realized that something was missing.
I had some pics from the earliest days of ALS that I just couldn't find anymore. Actually, as I would later learn, the pics that I couldn't find were shot and watermarked by ALS, but they were never on alsscan.com or alsangels.com. They were only released on CD by CDGirlsOnline.com, a site that is long gone. CDGirlsOnlines.com was a site that sold CD's of pics via mail with exclusive ALS pics that couldn't be found on their websites. I was let down, thinking that I might miss out ALS's original, earliest work.
So, I contacted support, and they were incredibly helpful! Support passed my email along to several other employees, each of who were remarkably helpful, until it ended up with ALS's content manager. We compared notes about ALS's pics from it's earliest days, and we looked over the really old stuff that I had in my collection. Almost all of the stuff that couldn't be found anymore was from CDGirlsOnline.com. Despite the fact that they had closed CDGirlsOnline.com years ago, he went the extra mile to help me out. So far, he has found thousands of rare, old pics from CDGirlsOnline.com. The ones that he has found so far were released only for a limited time as bonuses, bloopers, and outtakes on the ALS sites and then removed. Out of incredible generosity, he has made these classic ALS pics from CDGirlsOnline.com available to me. Some people feel inclined to guard and keep secret the rare things that they come across. I would rather as many of you as possible enjoy ALS's pics, so that is why I am sharing this information with you, with ALS's permission. These old pics - bonuses, bloopers, and outtakes - are available to you as well, if you sign up as a member and ask politely. ALS has made no announcement that they will be remastering these pics, posting them on their sites, or making them available indefinitely, but they are available right now by special request. They are not up to current ALS quality standards, they range from 400x600 to 1200x800 in resolution, but they are the sharpest 400x600 pics I have ever seen. It's also really cool to have ALS pics with watermarks dating back to 1996, even if the resolution is low by today's standards. What's more, ALS tells me that they still have everything that they ever shot, some in RAW files, and the earliest content on analog color film, all saved in a storage locker somewhere. Isn't that the stuff of legends?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Good quality photography
* Most girls are attractive and display a good attitude
* Good connection speed
* Navigation will mostly be familiar to users of other sites on Met-Art's network.
Cons:
* Streaming videos seem buggy if you want to do anything other than watch them from beginning to end without pauses or skips.
* Lots of strange insertions and weird borderline-BDSM pussy play (may be a pro to some)
* Very little, and mostly mediocre, boy/girl content
* Some videos are basically just the photo sets with a camcorder running (can hear posing instructions etc)
* Navigation options are very lacking and search often turns up irrelevant results. Has a tag system but searches seem to mostly ignore it.
* Model names aren't consistent with other sites, even other sites on the same network.
Bottom Line:
This is a site whose name I've been seeing for a LONG time. If it's not older than some of the girls in its newest sets, I'm pretty sure it's close - I'm fairly sure it debuted in the 90s, though it only specifically shows shoots back to 2005 at the moment, with selected older content relegated to an undated "archives" section.
I've liked a lot of the bits of content I've seen from them over the years, but never felt compelled to join until now. It seems to have recently been taken over by Met-Art. Like many other sites in their orbit of late, they're marketing it pretty aggressively, with a good discount available through PornUsers and an even better one having recently been e-mailed to current and former members of other sites in this network. On the basis of this, I signed up. Unfortunately I have just canceled after only four days (as always, the membership will still run for a total of a month, it just won't renew).
Partly this is because I mostly want boy/girl content and ALS has only recently started (or resumed - I could have sworn they had some in their early days?) shooting such content. I'd say well under a quarter of their recent updates (which occur once a day) have featured straight sex, and this content only dates back a few months.
However, it's hard to say for sure because there is no option to zero in on a particular type of content, other than a search box that seems to mostly pay attention to the (rather arbitrary) set titles. You'll look in vain for a list of categories on which you can click "boy/girl" and get a list of all the b/g content. Search for "boy/girl" and you'll get every set with "girl" in the title, which as you can imagine, is a LOT of them. This needs a rethink.
Once you've found what you're looking for, it's usually... good but not great. Nearly everything about this site is good but not great, actually (except the navigation which is downright bad). The looks of the models are good but not great, the creativity of the sets and shot choices is good but not great, technical aspects like connection speed are good but not great. Unfortunately with the number of sites competing for my dollar, "good but not great" isn't going to cut it. I certainly don't regret signing up, especially at the price they were offering as of a few days ago, but I don't see anything that compels me to renew.
As with network-mate Sexart (for which I would now want to revise my glowing review downwards a little), it seems to promise something amazing and groundbreaking but deliver something that's merely above-average.
Overall, I can honestly say this is a site I'd recommend, but only weakly so. It's definitely worth it at the very low prices on offer in various places lately. You might like it better than I did if you prefer solo or girl-girl action or if you're into things like a cute girl clipping a dream-catcher to her labia. (That kind of weird borderline-BDSM stuff is only in a minority of their sets, but it's conspicuous by the mere fact that it's there at all.) I can't say that's my thing; while I appreciate a more creative approach to porn, that isn't the direction in which I'd prefer to look for it.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
1-Great quality content and download options.
2-Huge selection of models.
3-Girl/Girl pairings that I watched seemed very authentic and unforced.
4-Great attitude from models in all the scenes I watches. They all seemed to really enjoy themselves and showing off for us.
5-Lots of good toy play.
6-Fast DL speeds.
Cons:
1-Navigation could be improved a bit.
2-Some scene types got a bit repetitive or had a lot of posing instructions from camera operators.
3-Nothing major here, almost feel like the points above are nitpicking.
Bottom Line:
Great quality site with lots of attractive ladies. If you want hardcore action go elsewhere, but if beautiful shaved young women sharing the enjoyment of their bodies is your thing, check this site out. I thought it was well worth joining and definitely earned its reputation as one of the best.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Huge collection dating back five years
- One of the few sites available that photo fans and video fans can both enjoy
- Standard-setting production values
- Site has a ‘personal’ feel thanks to the models and staff
- Site is simple, but user-friendly
- Exclusive content (not found elsewhere)
- Unique content (nothing else like it on the ‘net)
- Bills through CC Bill
- Excellent value
- Allows download managers with no obvious timeouts
- Offers HD in multiple formats
Cons:
- None. Seriously, none.
Bottom Line:
ALS Scan is a site that I shouldn’t like because I generally have little interest in solo girl, masturbation scenes and girl-girl scenes. But even though that’s all that ALS Scan offers, the site is certainly in my top-five favourite sites and a site that I go back to regularly.
I won’t go into a lot of detail about the technical specs of the site because those have been addressed before by me and others in earlier reviews. The site continues to offer HD video in both MP4 and WMV. I didn’t bother to comment on that in a previous review because I didn’t realize how rare that is. Due to size restrictions, many sites only offer HD in MP4 format and leave those of us who still prefer WMV to live with a lower-resolution file or go with MP4. This would appear to show the level of customer support that the site has if they take this extra step to keep a few of us happy.
I’ve said before that for me to really like a site it has to excel at three things: 1) the content has to be good, 2) the site design needs to be effective and user-friendly, and 3) the material needs to be easily accessed by the members either by streaming or download. A lot of sites score high on two of those, but few score high on all three of those. ALS is one of the sites that does well on all three. They certainly knock two of them out of the park and do better than average on another.
First the content: like any site, if you don’t like the content you’re not going to like the site regardless of how great the technical aspects are. In this respect prospective members really need to know that ALS Scan isn’t a ‘normal’ porn site. There is no hardcore b/g here at all. There’s no b/g stuff period. There is mostly solo and g/g material. If you’re not into that, the site might seem a bit dull, but they add some unique character by having lots of behind-the-scenes stuff too. I call it BTS, but only because I can’t think of a better term for it. Some people don’t like this, but some like me do, and that’s having the camera rolling during a photo shoot. I’m not sure why I like it, but I do and this stuff is very well done. ALS Scan may be best known, however, for their location shoots in the Caribbean, which seem to occur annually. These are a lot of fun to watch and take place at a villa and on the beach. For a site that shoots so much outdoor material the production values are incredible. These guys have the technical aspects of lighting, sound, camerawork and editing down solid. They should teach others these skills. The site offers hundreds, perhaps thousands of exclusive videos and all of them have a unique and personal feel to them. It’s like the staff are making porn that they like with no concerns about commercial value – except that what they make is so good it has exceptional value.
In terms of content, one thing that hasn’t been posted in several years and I really wish they’d shoot more of is European public nudity and body painting. I’m a big fan of this stuff and when the staff at ALS Scan did it they applied their usual high standards and made some of the best public nudity scenes available on the ‘net. (So if an ALS Scan staffer happens to read this, please, please, please shoot more public nudity!)
As for site design, it can be best described as ‘primitive.’ But while that might be a problem for many other sites it really isn’t here. Given the narrow focus of the site having a search function really wouldn’t add a lot of value. As it is, you can sort for photos or videos and you can sort by model. Beyond that not much is really needed. I think a fair contrast with the site design here might be to Videobox which had a simple, effective and plain-looking site. Then the marketers decided to make it look pretty to attract new members but in doing so they made it less user-friendly. The ALS Scan site probably looks like it did way back when they started, and since it works I hope they don’t see the need to make the site flashier at the expense of utility.
As for accessibility the site scores high here too. Downloads are fast, the site allows download managers, there appears to be no timeouts on downloads and there are no download limits. It seems that the site owners sat down and thought what they’d like if they were the customer and then did it.
Another rare attribute is that the site caters to both photo and video collectors. They offer high quality regardless of what you’re looking for. I’m not normally a photo collector, but this is one site that I make an exception. The photo quality is incredible.
Obviously I highly recommend ALS Scan, with the caveat on content. Even if you really have limited interest in the stuff they offer I’d still recommend giving them a try. The content is playful, personal and erotic thanks to the models and staff and the site lets you access it easily. That makes the site an excellent value.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Fantastic quantity of material. The girls are all very young, say, under 25. Newer videos are excellent and in HD. Newer photo sets come in high resolution. The girls appear to be having genuine fun. They use ample amounts of oil, lotion, various types of fruits and vegtables and many, many types of battery operated devices. Sets are dated and are available all the way back to 2006.
Cons:
Navigation is not as good as other sites. (For example, you can't scroll through the images in a set but have to page back out to the set menu and select the next image.) About 1 in 4 releases are actually re-releases of older material dating back as far as 2001...OK if you are a first time member but not if you are back for the 2nd or 3rd time. The narrow range of girl types, sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes the site a little monotonous after a while. The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here. Many of the newer models are not as attractive as models from prior years.
Bottom Line:
OK, bottom line? This is a lesbian and fetish site that is interesting to visit once just to see the show, but it caters to a relatively narrow taste. Nearly every girl is young, petite, small breasted and, of course, shaved. On the surface, that's not at all bad. Many of the girls from older sets and a few from newer ones are truly beautiful. A few headliners like Caprice, Malena Morgan and Franzeska, are easily recognizable from other sites even without much make-up. But the majority of recent girls are not particularly memorable and at best rate a notch above amatuer. Maybe after years of visiting this site I'm a little jaded. I apologize in advance if what I'm about to say seems harsh. The success of the site must mean that many people like the signature items they provide. Here are a few of those signature items:
1. There are NO boy/girl sex scenes. None. Lots of girl/girl scenes, though.
2. Practically every model gets fisted at some point. If you like that, this is paraadise.
3. There is an odd fascination with the inside of otherwise unviewable areas on the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uturus looks like. Many models agree to use what looks like an ambroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it niether sexy, nor flattering. In a word, it makes the models clinical.
4. Just about every model has to pee at some point. The photographers show you exactly when that is.
5. Ladies, care to have your nipples, clitoris or entire vagina vacuum pumped? Yep, they do that here!
6. The first time I saw a set where a model put a lollipop in her vagina I thought it was interesting and might be tasty. That was about 100 lollipops ago. Now I find myself wondering what flavor the odd color lollipop they use is.
7. This is not a glam site. As such, the girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt.
8. Allsscan has a sister site called allsangels. The webmaster/owner has no qualms with showing you a set of girls from auditions in his blog and picking out the more attractive girls to send over to ALSANGELS in an effort to sell you membership in that site much smaller for $25 a month. Sorry, all it does for me is piss me of that these better looking girls should have been but aren't on the site I'm a member of.
Ok, before you send me a nasty email, let me put a thought in your head. ALSSCAN is a bit of a sideshow. Sideshows have an odd combination of allure and freakiness that makes you want to go in to see what is there. I've seen this particular show about 5 times since the late 1990s and every few years I find myself wandering back in to see what the next big thing is going to be. (This time I think it is those emroidery hoop-clothespin things....)
Now, it is clear that the photographers have a tremendous rapport with the models as the models are usually having tremendous fun. I think this is because the models are not forced to please the camera so much. (heck, they hardly even LOOK at the camers.) Instead they are encouraged to please themselves and any other girls that happen to be nearby..and perhaps they are encouraged to experiment. Some of the best photo sets and videos come from annual outings where a dozen or so girls are chosen to go to a tropical island. Once there, they can run around naked and generally have sex with any girl they want...and they do.
So, again, bottom line...interesting place to visit but you might not want to stay for more than a month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Excellent quality in videos and photos
- HD Available (up to 1920x1080) for many videos and all newer videos
- Multiple download options
- HD Streaming available
- Over 1000 videos available (varying lengths)
- Photos available (most high resolution – some at 2592x3888)
- Photos zipped or singles
- Great mix of North American and European models
- Models are very beautiful
- Some great on-location shoots
- Not ‘cookie-cutter’ porn
- iPhone / mobile device users have separate area so no need to sort
- Still updating regularly
- Discount to ALS Angels with site membership ($9.95) (this is NOT a pre-checked cross-sell)
Cons:
- Limited search function
Bottom Line:
The last time I joined ALS Scan I joined specifically for the public nudity scenes. I did that because I really had no interest in anything else they had to offer. I did download some stuff other than the public nudity and when I finally got around to watching it I was amazed at how stunning the models were, how hot the scenes were, and how the site seemed to go out of its way to offer industry-leading resolutions on both video and pictures.
Objectively, the site is as good as it gets. It’s near perfect. It’s obvious that the site owner wants to deliver an excellent product to his customers.
The site offers both video and pictures, and unlike many other sites one doesn’t take a back seat to the other. Both are very well done. The site currently has over 1000 videos on the site, with more being added. One point about the updates is that they are new, as in recently shot, and they are old, in that the site offers older, re-mastered material.
The videos are all available in multiple formats. The formats and sizes vary depending on when the video was shot and uploaded, but it’s fair to say that if you’re downloading a video from 2007 it would have exceeded the specs of almost anything available elsewhere. For the past year or so all videos have been available in true HD. They’re available in DivX and mp4 format (1280x720) and in WMV9 at 1920x1080 (at 8000kbps). I only downloaded the WMV files, and they are amazingly crisp. This is some of the best video I’ve ever seen. HD streaming is also available. HD became pretty common in mid-2007 though not universal until later.
The videos come in several categories: solo photo shoot, solo masturbation and girl/girl. There are several public nudity shoots, but they haven’t added to these in a couple of years. Each year for the past several the crew has taken models to an on-location shoot in the Caribbean. The locations and the models combine with the technical expertise of the crew to create some fun, hot videos. There are also casting shoots in Budapest and the Czech Republic. These aren’t necessarily ‘hot’ but they are a lot of fun to watch. Mixed in to some of the scenes are some fisting (girl-on-girl and solo) and some peeing (but no golden showers).
I’m not a picture guy, but I’ll make an exception for this site. The pics are available as SD or HD and as singles or zipped. The HD size is large (I saw some at 2592x3888) and subjectively they are incredible! Zooming in causes no pixilation at all.
I used Free Download Manager and it worked perfectly. Download speeds were 1850+/- but that may be where my settings are since I don’t know how to change them. File sizes can be huge, so people with download caps need to be wary.
One thing I thought was a nice touch was that they created a separate portal for people who download to mobile devices. That makes finding the material easy.
Subjectively, this site is second to none. The models are stunning. There is a good mix of North American and European models. A-list porn stars are here too. The scenes all look incredible. The lighting, camera work, sound and editing are all near-perfect.
This isn’t cookie-cutter porn – although there are a few broad categories of scenes, the director and models do an excellent job of making each scene feel fresh. It looks like they’re having fun on the site. My guess is that they are.
Is there anything wrong with the site? Not really, but it could benefit from a search function. There is nothing now, and arguably that’s okay since the shoots can be sorted by model. By they should consider adding a search function for things like fisting, peeing and lesbian. But don’t get me wrong – the addition of a search function would only be like an extra layer of icing on a delicious cake. (And since they design and sell their own bikinis, maybe a search by style would be great too.)
Some caveats for anyone thinking of joining – these aren’t negatives, just things you need to be aware of: 1) there are no b/g scenes, 2) 99% of the models are petite, Caucasian and young.
To add more icing to the cake, when you join this site you can get a $9.95 subscription to ALS Angels. It’s a very similar site and I’m not really sure of the difference but it is a nice addition. If I find major differences I’ll post a comment or review if warranted.
The bottom line is that if you like this kind of material and these types of models, you likely won’t find a better site on the ‘net. Be prepared to spend some time here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
04-28-1103:10pm (Update History) Reason: The longer I am a member of this site the more I appreciate its qualities. Raising score by Two (2).
Pros:
A large selection of very beautiful models from Europe and North America.
Impressive photography, mostly solo or g/g. Available in approx. 930x1400 px, Normal Resolution and 2200x3500 px High Resolution, zipped. Slight changes in resolution from picture to picture. Enormously large sets giving you the choice of keeping only the very best.
Most recent videos are in HD format in 720p dvx and mp4 format, as well as the extra large videos at 1080p wmv. All are downloadable!
Streaming is also available for previews or watching the whole video on-line if you so desire. Streaming picture is HD and very clear as well. I experienced no buffering problems.
Speed of download was also very good for me at 3.5 MB/s. This was for a single file through Firefox's DTA. Normal downloads through the browser downloader were much slower but still around 600 KB/s but as a plus this way of doing things seemed to allow multiple downloads.
Nice bonus material (auditions, blogs, bts etc.)
Cons:
Huge picture sets will require a large amount of time to prune. I never thought I would consider a set containing approx. 300 pictures a con. Well, it isn't really - see above under pros, but some of you might be a bit more impatient when it comes to downloading or editing a 500 MB picture set so be warned.
I desperately want a search engine for this site. You practically have to go from update (arranged in chronological order) to update to find something that fits your taste.
Model directory is in alphabetical order but it would be nice if the pictures of the models contained the dates when her sets and videos were published. This would prevent the frustration of finding a beautiful model and then realize that her pictures are not High Resolution and her videos are split up into various parts .. something most of us aren't interested in nowadays unless we collect the complete works of a model.
Continued below:
Bottom Line:
It would be nice to be able to go to a point where publishing HD videos and HR pictures first started and work one's way up to the present from there.
Close attention is required when looking at the updates themselves, some are an invitation to rate sets, some are bonus material from other sites, some are masturbation videos or g/g videos, some are picture sets, but there are also videos of photoshoots .. something I dislike heartily, but others might enjoy.
Because I didn't pay attention originally I downloaded a hefty HD file (g/g content) expecting hot action and found myself listening to the distracting remarks of the director as he gave his instructions for the shoot. I don't like to have my illusions destroyed. But, as I said, some might like that sort of thing.
BOTTOM LINE:
This is a well-respected, well run site that offers top quality material. I did not see one single unattractive model, I'd even take the ones they had to reject during their auditions. Most would be between 18-25 in age.
The material is shot indoors, as well as in more exotic locations. Lovers of glamorous videos and picture sets will be well pleased.
There is also the added eroticism of a bit of kink. Fisting, insertion of large objects (mostly dildos), peeing, some public exposure scenes. Good stuff for most.
I also loved the fact that I did not come across one single pair of enhanced breasts. They MIGHT be there but I didn't come across them. This is so refreshing when compared to most sites!
I am adding my usual plaint, and yes, all of you who know me knew it would come:
I wish they featured some mature women, and I wish that their models would wear more than the bare necessities. Sometimes the girls don't even wear those, because I very seldom came across a bra or even a pair of panties during many of my spot checks of the picture sets and videos, but then I shouldn't go to a site like this one and expect it to be something it wasn't meant to be.
You can't expect to find cougars in a cubs' playpen.
After all this site is not meant for lovers of a leisurely strip by mature women but for those who revel in beautiful young, glistening bodies, and for them ALS SCAN does its job very well.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A fantastic array of beautiful girls
- Very detailed and "up-front" photos
- High quality vids, offered in three different formats; 1280x720 HD DivX, 1280x720 HD MP4, 1920x1080 HD WM
- Older models have their videos remastered and published
- Director's blog - you can read and find out what's going behind the scenes and grab some exclusive vid's or photo shoots
- Lots of mqsturbation and self-toying action
- Their castings are featured on video, and photos /w commentary
Cons:
- The website design. I've been a member three times, and it hasn't changed much from when I first joined in 2002.
- No search function
- Too much fisting for my taste
- Too much focus on "perfect breasts and no tattoos", come on, let in a girl that have some personality and quirky feautres.
- ALS hasn't published all videos of their older models (instead they sell them on DVD for 49.99 o so), come on.
Give us long time fans everything that was ever made with girls like Joanne, Jana, April, etc to download, and I'll be an happy customer.
- Download speeds. It averages at 150 kbit/s per file, and I ave a 8mbit/s line, and there seems to be a 2 or 3 file downloadlimit.
- Only works in IE
Bottom Line:
I think that ALS has run it course, yes it is still joinable, and it's not a bad site to join (especially if it is for the first time), but as a third time member I must say that I'm not impressed.
It feels like time stood still, and yes, they do HD, but it is so boring to watch.
And most of the new models are rubbish. They should have picked up at least 10 new models that they discarded from the casting sessions (because she looked unhappy or had a tattoo), come on man.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Stunning models
- All models are young, petite and shaved
- Some great scenes on location in Europe and the Caribbean
- Pictures and video available
- No DRM
- HUGE volume of material available
- Some public nudity
- The public scenes are very well done
- Simple, if somewhat dated, navigation
Cons:
- No search function apart from searching by model
- Less public nudity than I expected since it was heavily promoted in the tour
Bottom Line:
The reason I joined ALS Scan was because the previews showed that there was some public nudity available, and as a big fan of that I joined for that reason alone.
While I’m not a big fan of solo softcore sites, I have to admit to being really impressed with ALS Scan. This is an excellent site that offers some stunning women in both videos and pictures. All of the women are pretty much of the same body type – petite and small breasted. For a guy who thinks small-breasted petite women are the best, this makes the site even better. There is a decent mix of Eastern European models and American women. Some porn stars make an appearance too, like Courtney Simpson and Faye Reagan. Most of the models are also fairly young (18-25) and, as the site’s name says, all of the ladies are shaved. So if you like petite, young, shaved models, you should consider a membership on the strength of that alone.
Many of the video/picture shoots take place on an indoor set, but there are a lot that are shot in the Caribbean. These are visually outstanding. Apart from solo girl action, there is some peeing, some toy and speculum use and some girl/girl stuff. All of it is well shot.
The videos are classed into two broad categories: masturbation and photo shoot. The photo shoot scenes are pretty interesting as they give a behind-the-scenes perspective on what goes on.
I joined because the site promised some public nudity. There is some of that, but not a lot. What is there is excellent though, and for a big fan of public stuff that alone was worth the price. All the public nudity is done in Europe with European models. For a site into solo girls, they really seem to understand public nudity. Unlike some other sites (Nude in LA) the public nudity isn’t matter-of-fact and sterile. It is really well done and the titillation and risk are well presented. They also do something that I’ve never seen before and hope to see more of – that is using body paint to paint a skimpy outfit on a nude model and then send her out to the streets. This is really innovative and a lot of fun to watch. I appreciate that the editors chose to film the painting too – this adds to the fun.
But ALS Scan also has the technical side right too. They offer several different choices of resolution with the HD being visually stunning. Other reviewers have covered more of the technical stuff below.
One drawback is that there is no search function. I had no way to easily find the public nudity even though each scene was categorized in that way. Likewise, there is no way to separate out the photo shoot scenes from that masturbation scenes. Some search function would be an improvement.
I may not be a big fan of solo girl sites, but I’m now a big fan of ALS Scan. The people behind ALS present some stunning models in well-shot scenes and make it available through an easy-to-use and modern website. Overall, an excellent value.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ 250+ smiling, skinny, shaved, super-hot hot models
+ Still almost purely solo- or girl-girl action that stays pretty entertaining
+ Amazing quality:
• videos: HD up to 1920x1080 @ 300 kb/s
• photos: hi-res are roughly 3900x2600px
+ Great quantity too; archived vids back to Apr 2007, photos much farther back
+ Daily video updates, new photo set released every two days
+ Download speeds have a lot of ass; I normally got about 1.3MB/s with a DL manager
+ They donate some of their pervy profits to charity, in case philanthropy is a deciding factor
Cons:
- Large percentage of videos are just BTS, and with photo sets the BTS is usually just mixed in
- Some models' content takes a long time to get released or simply stays unreleased
- Site design works well for what it is, but still has NO search function
- They are beginning to delve into boy-girl content, even if only lightly (read more in BL)
- Despite the fun some content can get predictable and routine
- 2 years since my first review and I still wish they would shoot more American girls or non-Euro girls
- I don't get to meet these girls in person! :-(
Bottom Line:
What can I say that hasn't already been said so many times and so well about one of my all time favorite adult sites over the years--hell, over the history of much of the crazy web itself, seeing how these guys have been finding and shooting hot shaved ladies since 1996. And since they have been doing this for so long they know a thing or two about getting the goods; great photo and video quality, lots of content, fast access, and above all some very happy models, many of whom come back wanting more.
That last point, happy models who become 'repeat offenders' shall we say, is not something I take lightly when I am looking for a new site to join and it's something where ALS has never faltered. I may be in the minority when I say this, but I genuinely don't enjoy porn where the performers, know matter how willing, are abused, beaten up, disrespected, or at the end of the day just left dissatisfied and unhappy. Of course ALS being in the girls only genre probably helps keep things in check but it, like the majority of sites, is still owned and run by a male and caters to a primarily male audience.
And despite all of this male input the output for many years was totally female; female models with female assistants in most cases and a female co-performer or two in some others. But in the past few years they have, if ever so slightly, started to also use male assistants, or at least made them more visible in both photos and videos--not my cup of tea, thank you very much. Even more alarming--or simply the next logical step, depending on your view--they have just recently shot an actual boy-girl scene. It's yet to be released and is described as a blowjob scene with swallowing, but time will tell as to where ALS steers its content.
Generally speaking, and if you're not looking for hardcore content, there's a lot to love here and at least a little to hate. So take your pick; young, skinny, shaved, mostly white models who are not too shy, so don't be surprised by a single model performing many if not all of the following; peeing, fisting, speculum and other crazy insertions, anal, and near constant spreading. The site design may not be impressive to many, nor may be the large amount of BTS, but don't let it fool you--as girls-only content goes they do not disappoint.
I do wish they would be more consistent in releases though. They still have a habit of letting members vote on models' scenes to determine release order and this can mean months before a model's whole shoot is available, and some just never gets released at all. I guess this is a good thing--so much content that there's not enough time to release it all--but I would like to see it eventually. And as unique as some of their content is it can get predictably routine; toy A into slot b, and so on.
But damn if they don't make it look hot time and time again with each new model they find and corrupt. All these years and I'm still sold! :-P
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+++ daily updates
+++ great models + primilary teens
+++ big archive for movies and galleries
++ newer videos in hdv quality (16:9) older ones are in 4:3 format
++ no DRM or download limitations
+ easy navigation
+ good price
Cons:
--- inconsistant design
--- outmoded technologies in use e.g.popups (without scrollbars when needed)
-- some girls wear braces
-- the repetitivness of content is obvious but part of the concept
Bottom Line:
ALS Scan is a good blast from the past till the present. They were part of the porn history online and had formed their own unique style.
ALS Scan has shaved girls only. You'll find them often in solo, girl girl, oiled up, toy, pee, speculum and veggie action or in combination of those.
They offer exactly what they promise and that makes ALS Scan a perfect match for those who seek for flexible teens, small tits, spread legs and other kinky stuff.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive content of younger models in solo masturbation, insertions, gaping, speculum, lesbianism, and peeing.
- All models are shaved and quite petite, these models have breasts on the smaller size.
- Updates daily with mixed content.
- No DRM.
- No Download Limit.
- Picture sets are updating at excellent resolution (~3504 X 2336 or 1600 X 1067). These vary with updates, going a bit higher or lower. Older sets are all in the smaller size. All available in zip format. Watermarks are non-intrusive.
- Videos are updating in true HD quality in 3 different formats being DivX, mp4, and WMV (1920 X 1080, ~8000 kbps or 1280 X 720, ~4000 kbps). Older videos are being updated to higher res or just available in two formats (720 X 540, ~3200 kbps or 640 X 480, ~2750 kbps). There are other options as well, a lot of variation.
- Older stuff is being remastered to formats above, so the site is constantly updated the old with the new.
- Director's Blog area for news.
- Model Index.
Cons:
- While navigation is easy, the site design has about 4 different formats that it has used in the past. These all stayed how they were at the time, so you get pages of all variations. A minor flaw, but these should all stay consistant for easier viewing.
- While I stated the fact that these models are petite and small breasted as a pro, keep this in mind when you join. There is a sister site, ALS Angels for more voluptuous models.
- While both the older photos and videos are being updated, the bulk of the material is still in the older formats at the time of this review. Just keep this in mind.
- There are a lot of videos of behind the scenes and photoshoots. While I see a purpose of these (more in bottom line), it is worth mentioning.
- The site updates models based on a voting system which is great, but in the older content it makes for downloading the picture set zips a bit awkward. Sometimes you get zips with only 1 or 2 photos in it or 2 to 3 different zip files for one set.
Bottom Line:
ALS Scan has been around for awhile. The site boasts plenty of content at more than 70,000 pictures and over 1 TB of videos. Featuring mostly small breasted euro models, the majority of the models are extremely cute in nature. While I personally like my models a bit bigger in general, I cannot knock the site for wanting these type of girls here. The directors appear to create such a comforting aura with these girls resulting in extremely quality content that is both sexually arousing for the models and fun. It's one of the first sites in awhile that the models appear to be enjoying themselves for real and not just putting on a show for money.
The videos in the new format are the BEST I've ever seen to the date in terms of quality of clarity. Finally, a site using a true HD camera with the right compression. However, these files can get extremely large. But, it's worth it in my opinion. There are 3 styles of video content. These being BTS & photoshoots, solo masturbation, and lesbian scenes. The BTS & photoshoots are not there exactly for the pure sexuality, but I found these to be a great glimpse in to the model's personality. These display everything from gaping, speculum, peeing, to staged masturbation or lesbianism. The masturbation scenes are very well done in terms of the sexual energy and camera work. As stated before, there is a comfort level that these directors produce which makes for these models truly enjoying exploring their bodies. There is just a raw feeling in most of these videos that really struck me the right way. These videos are clearly potraying a young woman enjoying herself sexually in a real fashion. The lesbian scenes are quite raw as well. The models used for these scenes really appear to enjoy each others company and are truly attracted to each other. Lots of kissing and smiling, but intense fisting, fingering, and licking as well. I really don't gravitate towards lesbian content but I found these videos to be quite impressive.
The photography is top of the line and features mostly simulated masturbation and or extreme close ups or long shots filled with tons of props for insertions. The newer high res show off the model extremely well and are not photoshopped for fakeness. But, even the lower res photos look good. You will probably be downloading a few of these because the high res photo zips can be as large as the videos at ~500+ MBs for a scene.
Overall, with the mix of awesome photos and extremely great videos, this site is something else. The solo model content mixed with the girl-girl action is solid. Plus, there are scenes at vacation spots with 5+ featured models which are some of the best content I've ever seen at any site so far. I love those scenes. The site may be lacking in site design and the older content not being up to par with the new updates, but with the attempt to reformat those I believe these cons can be overlooked. The site is bringing new models in and upgrading the old. Recommended!
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
