Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I thought for sure, one of my highest rated sites would stumble some, but it’s not happening.
I try not to be too focused on body types, but I have been slim and “undeveloped” my whole adult life. The majority of models on TLE are slim and not “blessed” in the chest. I can relate to these women and learn from them.
The site is huge and you can almost always find promos; just be sure it’s not streaming-only.
Updates have been 2-3 videos per week and 2-3 picture sets a week.
The site has just over 3,000 picture sets and just over 1,500 videos
Tags, search, are all near perfect
Cons:
Back to my enjoyment of slim models. That could be a con for some of you.
I can’t really complain much about update frequency, but I do think this site used to update more than now.
Bottom Line:
I hadn’t been a member of The Life Erotic for nearly 3 years. The last time I reviewed it, I gave it a 97. There’s good and bad news. The site hasn’t changed much since then and easily earns an upper 90s score. But if you didn’t like the site before, you probably won’t like it now. The scenes are masturbation, solo. The picture sets are a lot like what you would expect from a Met Art owned site. That means large resolution and mostly pretty poses that accentuate the models’ natural beauty.
The site really is huge and still updating. The numbers are above in the pros. My first porn site I joined was Nubiles and a part of me still prefers picture sets and videos of pretty/cute models masturbating for the camera. That helps The Life Erotic a lot. The porn you’ll find on The Life Erotic is not as tame as most softcore sites. It’s even quite hardcore – for masturbation scenes. I have jointed all the Met-Art owned sites including the Met Art Network, but I still have to say, I think The Life Erotic is the best of the entire group. Met Art does still photography near perfect. Met Art X is good solo masturbation porn. Sex Art is great story-based hardcore male/female porn. The Life Erotic takes a little of the best from each of those and combines them into one site.
One of the most recent scenes even shows the depth of the scenes. It has one of my favorites, Paloma, she is bound with tape and a gag in her mouth. She dances around even with the tape on her. She lowers herself towards a chair that has a big dildo strapped to it. She teases the dildo and herself until it’s inside her and she’s riding it. That’s not what I usually expect from a solo masturbation site. The scenes are really top-notch and the production is great. The scenes aren’t typically long, but are usually long enough that you don’t feel like they’re rushing through, but also doesn’t make you think the scenes are too drawn out. These feel like real masturbation sessions.
The video quality downloads are HD and 4K. The pictures are downloadable in zips and that I know of, there is no download limit.
If you have used any of the Met-Art sites the navigation will be familiar to you. The tags are great as is the search. The model list is helpful as well. There’s hardly nothing to call a con, other than if you don’t like the models. It’s a site I would even call “special”. It won’t be another 3 years before I join again. This should be a 2-3 time join per year for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the sites under the Metart banner. This site features all the bells and whistles of the main Metart layout and features:
-Simplified layout, makes browsing the site easy.
-Premium photo sets, with first rate photographers doing the shoots.
So the photos are basically crystal clear, nicely focused, wonderful skin tones, etc.
-The videos are far superior to most videos at the Metart.com site: Two reasons for this:
-This site allows a far higher element of sexual hardcore than the main Metart site.
-Whoever is directing the videos (and the photo sets), is showing two women not only kissing, licking and sucking, but fucking as well (with a strap-on dildo, but it makes for a nice change from a guy boffing a woman).
-So the photo sets and videos are basically high-class glamour lez action with strap-ons, in wonderful color, with crisp, excellent photography for the videos and photo sets.
-The selection of models is top notch. These girls are often featured at other Metart sites,
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
but here, they seem to shine even brighter. Maybe it's just acting, but the girls seem to be having fun and are into the sex. Which adds sparkle to the photo sets and videos. I have often complained that most Metart videos are boring, no matter how lovely the Metart model may be.
But at Straplez, I enjoy looking through the photo sets, and really enjoy the videos. That might be because this is my first time at the site, but it's been a very pleasing membership so far.
-PU has a discounted price of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month.
-All content is exclusive.
-No download limits, which is becoming rare at porn sites.
-The models dress in attractive lingerie: nice bra and panties, nylons, stockings, etc. Which adds to the glamour of the scene.
-The newer videos are available in 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p, and 4k UHD.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Porn Users lists the site as "Strap Lezz". But the site calls itself "Strap Lez", with only a single "z" in the name.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Photos have a watermark, but it's small and usually located in the bottom right corner, so a very minor con.
-Like all Metart sites, this is a stand-alone site. You don't get access to other sites when you join strap-lez.
-The video coding seems very inefficient.
The 4k UHD file size is large, up to 12 GB.
By comparison, the 1080p video is only 1 GB.
What is strange, is that the 720p video is also 1 GB.
(All sizes were for the same video.)
You downsize to 360p, and the file size is 415 MB.
Just look at the 4k UHD, which is 12 GB at StrapLez.
On Metart, 4k UHD videos are 3 to 5 GB.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
If you are into lez action, I suggest giving the site at least a one-month visit.
I found this to be one of the better lez sites on the internet. Extremely attractive models, simple but effective plots (even if it's just two or more females hugging and kissing and licking before they get into the sex). Plus the elements of sophistication and glamour and quality settings and quality costumes. There is nothing cheap about the site, the photo sets, or the videos. This is a first-class website.
The site features attractive models performing as lesbians.
Since these are porn stars, I don't know how many of these models are real lesbians, or just performing for pay.
But the performance these women put on is both sensual and erotic.
You get regular updates, unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. Around 9 updates per month (a mix of photosets and videos).
Since the first month is only $9.95 (recurs at $19.99/month), I highly recommend checking the site out.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
2 updates every week on Monday and Thursday
Lots of smiling in the photo sets - I like seeing happy girls
BOTD Archive - still accessible for free off the legacy site (legacy.domai.com) - updated daily, 15 beauties are rotated through
Lifetime memberships are offered
Navigation and site layout has been updated to match the style of MA (although the old legacy style is still available)
Site response is generally quite good - good download speed, good refresh from page to page, etc.
Picture quality is superb
More girl-next-door types here
Lots of nature sets, because nudity is natural, and nature is natural, so what better place to do your first nude photo shoots than in nature? These do seem to be the first photo shoots for a large number of these models.
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. The girls are beautiful and the settings are beautiful.
The site uses TLS 1.2 so passwords, etc are secure in transit
Part of the Met Art network – customer support is superb
Cons:
Only two updates per week
Pictures only - no videos
Price for monthly is up to $29.99 (it’s not hard to find discounts to $19.99), even though the legacy site still mentions $9.99 as the price - and the price is the same whether you join from the legacy site or the updated version. There typically also sales for all the sites in the MA network around holiday times (like Valentine's Day) for $9.99 - so definitely look for those.
Most girls have only a small number of photo sets (like one or two or three), so if you really like a girl you may not get to see that much of her
Model info is really minimal here, and in many cases non-existent. DOMAI started up in 1997, but very little of the pre-2005 content is available
Very little striptease action, which goes along with the idea of “just the nudes ma’am”
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. This is a very tame site.
Bottom Line:
Some stats:
1533 Models
161 Contributing Photographers
3916 Galleries
Long one of my favorite sites, I’ve been a member of this site for years, and ponied up for a lifetime membership in 2017. The focus here is quite simply pictures of beautiful nude women. In fact the founder of the site referred to the philosophy being “simple nudes”, and that is still the governing idea here.
While full nudity is throughout the site (most of the sets the model is completely nude starting at picture 1, so not a lot of striptease here), Domai sticks to the tamer side of things. In fact, a few years back, the original founder of Domai (Eolake Stubblehouse) added a sister site called Goddess Nudes to allow them to show more private parts.
There is a lot of overlap between Goddess Nudes and Domai, with some sets appearing on both sites and only a couple of pictures added or removed. Since both of the sites have been acquired by Met Art, the sites appear to be a little more distinct than in the past, but even Goddess Nudes isn’t remotely hard core, and Domai is no longer afraid of open leg shots.
There are 3 other sister sites in the Met Art network that are very similar to DOMAI – Erotic Beauty, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica-Archives. Each of them now updates twice a week, and there is considerable overlap between the models and the photographers. They are also not nearly as distinct from each other as they used to be when they started out. It’s also not unusual for a set for a girl appearing on one of the sites, and then a bit later a second site will pick up the same set, although with a slightly different selection of photos
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on all of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is a re-review of Viv Thomas, which I reviewed just about a year ago. I’m still a member on it..
In my opinion, the prettiest models on any pornsite, sure, most of the models are on other sites too, but Viv Thomas’ site has magic other sites don’t have.
There are 3,617 photo sets to download and 2,424 videos to download.
There are 1,217 models.
The downloadable videos are unlimited and newer ones have 4K.
It’s a Met-Art Network site so it has the navigation, usability and all the bells and whistles
The most passionate lesbian scenes I have ever viewed.
Cons:
I have read complaints in the scene comments about old scenes being removed.
It has kept me hostage as a member for over a year. I just can’t talk myself into canceling.
Bottom Line:
It’s not uncommon for us to re-review favorite sites, but this re-review was brought on by me staying as a member way longer than I thought I would. I think that’s the very biggest compliment to a site. Viv Thomas has always been a name in porn that I have been drawn to. I used to look up his videos on tube sites. Back then, I didn’t even know this site existed. I have always felt like Vivid was the only studio that could make porn as good as Viv Thomas. I am speaking solely on the lesbian genre.
The site has all the technical numbers you could ever want. There are 2,424 videos and the newer ones can be downloaded in 4K resolution, even though I do only download in 720 and 1080. The picture sets are spectacular with 5700x3700 resolution on the large zip filed pictures. There’s a purpose with every photo. If you flip through them you can watch the women in motion.
There are roughly 5-6 updates per week.
During my second month of membership, I decided to keep letting the subscription recur and that was over 10 months ago. I just didn’t think there was a site that could impress me that much and keep my attention on it. But Viv Thomas has
Why did I list the models looks as a pro when they are on other sites? Viv Thomas site gets a different version of the models. They are more feminine, sexier, less-robotic and look like everyone of them is competing to have the best, sexiest, hottest scene on Viv’s site. I have been buying and collecting porn long enough to know the older scenes are the best. Now a current producer/director on Viv Thomas, retired model Sandra Shine – has scenes on Viv Thomas, of her as the star that blow away newer scenes on any site. There are years, not a handful of updates, that every scene is a little hotter than the previous one.
Clothed women, touching each other, kissing, tongues touching, until the clothes seemingly just melts off their bodies. Maybe it is the sign of the times in porn? The Viv Thomas new scenes are very good and, in my opinion, as good as any lesbian site’s scenes, but it’s those older scenes you have to watch. It doesn’t even matter if you like the models. You won’t see this much heat in a scene on any other site. Maybe you can, but I sure can’t.
The site is owned or managed by Met-Art now and you can see that. The videos/films are in a tab, the photos are in a tab and the model list is in a tab. It’s that simple and it’s another reason I love this site. I did join Viv Thomas a long time ago. It had a video site and a photo site back then. Having all this content on one easy to use site makes me not want to cancel!
I do think it’s humorous to read the comments on the different scenes. You will always have that one guy that says all they need is a dick in the scene. That’s because he is that turned on by the scene! I have seen some of the male/female Viv Thomas scenes from the late 90s and they are good, but I don’t see the removal of those as anything to be that upset about. It looks like Met-Art decided to promote Viv Thomas’ lesbian scenes and who could possibly argue with their decision?
In my now 14 months of membership, I could stop joining other sites and just join Viv Thomas. It’s that good . The scenes are not only believable, but are so hot they become nearly unbelievable.
A site like this one could hurt my viewing of other porn. I want to see the models looking like they are willing to tear their paycheck up. Scenes that are that good are very rare, but I could list over 100 from Viv Thomas that gave me that feeling. Combine that quality with the technical aspects and I have what is my perfect site.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Stunning Models
-Extreme High Quality Photos
-Very Intimate Close Up
-A lot of Toy / Finger Use
-Frequent Updates (Every 1-2 Days)
-Commenting & Rating is allowed
-Add your own tags
-Ability to rate & follow models
-Ability to view all network sites or individually
-Massive amount of content 3700+ Videos & 3800+ Galleries at time of review.
-Photo set slideshow option
-Next and previous gallery links on each gallery page.
Cons:
-No Guy/Girl Scenes
-No options to view models you have favorited
-Some sets posted as updates are from past.
-Some girls have an alias on network sites. If you are a member of multiple sites in network you may not find all the galleries for same individual.
Bottom Line:
ALS Scan is part of the Metart network so site function and features are the same. However ALS Scan has to be purchased in addition to Metart network or individually. The models are absolutely stunning and majority are young. The ALS stands for All Ladies Shaved so you won't see any bushes. There are some but very few sets that has small amounts of pubic hair. The site is very easy to use, feature rich, and well thought out. The image quality in extremely high quality and very close up. You can literally see when she's dripping wet. I originally joined metart network and was then offered an option to add ALS Scan for a one time lifetime purchase of $500. There is many galleries/videos featuring fingering and toys as well as girl/girl. There are no guy/girl scenes. There is commenting & rating allowed. The users are very positive and informative. You can add your own tags to galleries and videos which making finding things again easy. The model rating system is well thought out and you can follow a model which gets you an email anytime they have an update. Unfortunately there is not a page to view all the models you have favorited. I also love that when viewing a gallery you can start a slideshow with options on speed and image size. There is also links to the previous and next galleries which makes browsing very easy. There are also links to download the video and/or download a zip file of the gallery.
Really the only thing I don't like about the site you can't view a list of models that you have a favorited. If you are a member of multiple sites on the metart network you may find the same girl has an alias. It would be convenient if the sites in the network chose one of the other.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Probably the finest softcore porn site in the world. The site empasizes photo sets, but also has thousands of softcore videos.
-The site has thousands of models, many of them some of the most beautiful models in the world.
-The models are mainly white Eastern European teens, but there is a large number of models in their twenties and thirties as well.
Most of the older models started their careers as teens, and continued as models for years afterward.
-The site updates with 4 models each day, except for the first day of each month, where you get updates for 6 models. No other site (softcore glamour) comes close to the daily update rate of Metart.
-The photography at the site comes from hundreds of professional photographers, the largest stable of photographers of any site I know of.
Cons:
-The amount of softcore content at the site is huge. And that is a problem: You don't appreciate the quality of the photo sets because there are so many gorgeous models on display. That's human nature.
-The site structure is organized for easy navigation. The search is excellent. That's a plus, obviously, but people take the excellent organization and search capabilities for granted. Again, it's human nature to discount what you have in abundance.
-Most of the Metart videos are boring, in spite of how lovely the models can be. I don't know why. Softcore videos can be erotic, but I find that most photo sets are far more erotic than the videos. I'm guessing that there are too many factors that go into creating a video, and that it's easier or simpler to make an erotic photograph than an erotic video.
Bottom Line:
Metart is the finest softcore site I've ever found. Many of the models are some of the most beautiful women in the world. You have a vast amount of photosets, well over 2,000. You have over 4,000 models. You have no download limits for streaming or downloading. You have a daily update rate of 4 models each day (except for the first of the month, when you get 6 models).
Almost all photo sets have over 100 photos per set.
Metart started around 1999, so if you have your favorite models at the site, you can probably find several of her sets over time.
There is a brief model listing for most models, which give her physical attributes, and most model listings have a brief bio, which might be accurate (or wholly made-up, which is often the case with porn, going back to the days of Playboy and Penthouse).
Basically, I think Metart is the best softcore porn site on the internet. Because of the huge amount of photo sets of thousands of attractive girls. And the ease of navigating the site.
The membership price is no higher than any other softcore site, in spite of the massive amount of content.
However, some PU members might want Metart to have a more diverse selection of models: most models are white, slender, Eastern European teens. There are some Black, Asian, Latino models, but they are definitely the minority.
I'm giving the site a score of 98, because I think Metart is, as I said, the finest softcore glamcore site in the world.
And the support staff is superb. One of the best I've found. They are responsive to any emails asking for help from members, responding within 24 hours usually.
The PU site has a discounted price of $5 for the first month.
Any PU member who has not been a member of the site should grab that bargain.
And PU members who have been previous members of the site should also use that chance to see what new content is available since their last membership.
Like I said, Metart is the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Over 500 girls to check out
Plenty of resolution options for pics and videos
PU discount is always nice
Decent download speed
Search function (see con)
Some might like the rating system
Cons:
Model names not in file names
Search function limitations
Lots of video without a matching photo set
Pic sets for a BTS video no matching full video?
Only preview for video is a small, fast moving gif
Very little diversity - mostly skinny white girls
Repetitive scenes
Bottom Line:
This wasn't my first time in on this site but it was a good while back and I don't remember it being this bothersome. The only big positives I can say about the site is that they don't feature girls with a ton of tattoos, piercings or breast implants and the 4K video looks really good. After that, the site really left me scratching my head.
I don't understand why the video and picture sections are exclusive of each other and yet come together when doing searches. Searching with a keyword/tag brings up both video and pictures when all I'm after are the videos. I also found that the search function seems to be based on existing tags, so you don't always get results. I think a page with all the tags would end that issue.
Having to manually add a model's name to each file is annoying.
It'd be nice to get an idea of what's in the video before downloading it. There is a link below each video that says Photos, but all that's there are four versions of the cover for the video. Why? What about a photoset? And that gif preview? I use a 43 inch TV as a monitor and it's still difficult to see what's what. I found myself deleting quite a few scenes pretty much right after I downloaded 'em and checked 'em out. A better preview would help them save some server bandwidth.
I've never bothered with rating anything. I really don't care who is the most popular with the masses.
As was mentioned in a comment for the site, some of the stuff is just plain weird, like the embroidery hoop insertions.
I'll admit that it could just be that I'm starting to find all porn getting repetitive but here it just seems so formulaic. Shower? Drop the towel, soak up, go to the vibrator. Outdoor scene? Drop the clothes, show off in a bunch of poses, go to the vibrator or some bizarre insertion.
As a bottom line, I'd say it was easily worth the $5 I dropped on it, and it might be a good one and done site for someone who's never checked it out, but I doubt I'd go back unless I see they revamped the site. I only rated it as high as I did because the video quality is really good. That'll go along way to maintaining the quality when I chop up/cut out the weird parts with my video editor.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Consistently one of my top sites
- Slim, pretty, sexy, cute and shaven. There’s a chance that’s all you need to know.
- Technical quality has always been a strength for ALS. Videos are HD or 4K. You’re going to see every pubic hair stubble.
- There’s no dropoff in the quality of pictures. You can download them and they are topping out at 4000 long end
- Fun videos, it’s an unofficial trademark of ALS videos. The models enjoy themselves and there are lots of genuine smiles. Watch the BTS videos to see for yourself.
- Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
- Can also be accessed as part of the Met Art Network and is to me the best site on Met Art’s Network.
Cons:
- Just don’t join to see big booties and boobs. These are slim models. I too prefer bigger built models but ALS Scan is an exception for me.
– The more extreme scenes may be a turn-off for some
Bottom Line:
ALS Scan is likely one of the most respected pornsites. It has become known for the happy models, the big smiles, the laughter and everything you don’t expect from a pornsite with fists being stuck up in the tiny models. There’s a constant playfulness in the scenes and though mentioned many times before, the beach vacation scenes are still worthy of a spot in anyone’s best scenes collection. Those scenes showed that ALS Scan knew they had something special going on with their on-screen chemistry with models.
I once made the comment that I wondered if Met-Art realized putting ALS Scan on their network, bumped the Met-Art sites down a notch. I’m not for sure Met-Art minds since ALS Scan brought charisma that Met-Art lacked. The models try their best to keep a girl next door look but that only makes them even more attractive.
The standard scene on ALS Scan is solo masturbation. Somewhere along the way, they decided to work a helper into some of the scenes and that was a major boost. Seeing the helper being as shy as the masturbating model only adds tension for those watching it. Good tension. I have found myself pulling for the helper to jam another finger in the model … hold the lube. Make her moan a little more.
Pictures are a major part of ALS Scan’s site. Their pictures are large and the zip files often have over 200 pictures in each one. You can download videos and photosets to your heart’s content.
If you’re at all familiar with any of the Met-Art sites, the navigation will be familiar to you. That was one of the biggest positives of ALS Scan moving to Met-Art’s network. The navigation and layout of the site received an overhaul. The site, despite its huge size, is easy to navigate and search.
The numbers for the site show just how big it is. There are almost 4,000 videos and 4,000 photosets. That’s a lot of shaved beavers.
This is still a site that makes it difficult to find cons. One could say the older scenes with the OB/Gyn “tools” were not that sexy but those only make up a small part of the entire collection. Maybe you could complain about watching one pretty, young woman shaving another pretty, young woman’s pubic hair but that goes away when the one shaving starts licking the other.
This content is what men like to think really happens each time two women get around each other and we want to be their top voyeur. ALS Scan lets you be that.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Stunning Models Most beautiful women in the world
-Lifetime membership option
-Multiple updates per day
-Softcore & Hardcore
-Commenting & Rating is allowed
-Add your own tags
-Ability to rate & follow models
-Ability to view all network sites or individually
-Massive amount of content
-Photo set slideshow option
-Next and previous gallery links on each gallery page.
Cons:
-Some sites cost extra on top of network membership
-No options to view models you have favorited
-Some models have alias on other network sites
-Some updates are from sets from past. (This could also be a pro. There have been sets posted of models that are popular today but set was taken when model was much younger than they are today.)
Bottom Line:
This is my personal favorite that I visit daily. SIte is clean and very easy to navigate. There is multiple updates per day; typically 1 updates for several of the sites in the network. The image and video quality is superb. Though not listed on their join page; I was able to contact them and obtain a lifetime membership option. I was also offered options to add additional sites for a fee per site for life. There is mostly softcore & glamour shoots here but majority are very intimate with close up shots of these beauties. There is many galleries/videos featuring fingering and toys as well as girl/girl and guy/girl hardcore via SexArt. There is commenting & rating allowed. The users are very positive and informative. You can add your own tags to galleries and videos which making finding things again easy. The model rating system is well thought out and you can follow a model which gets you an email anytime they have an update. Unfortunately there is not a page to view all the models you have favorited. The network site allows for you to view all the network sites or you can view the sites content independently. There is an absolute massive amount of high quality material here. I also love that when viewing a gallery you can start a slideshow with options on speed and image size. There is also links to the previous and next galleries which makes browsing very easy.
Really the only thing I don't like about the site is it was confusing exactly which sites you get when you join and I've seen variations of which site depending on where you look. Some sites cost extra in addition to your network membership. I also don't like that some models have different names depending on which site they are on. It would be nice if they would combine them and list the names as an alias. You can't view a list of models that you have a favorited.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The world’s top softcore, photography-focused site.
Multiple daily updates
Pretty models even if nearly interchangeable with each other
Videos are included, but I can’t say I download them for anything other than reviewing purposes.
Photos can be downloaded in zip files.
Intriguing trial offers to Met-Art’s other sites.
Cons:
Redundant, boring, dull, repetitive are adjectives you may use if you stay around for more than a month at a time.
Though not really distracting there are a lot of ads for Met-Art’s other sites
Bottom Line:
Starting with the main and first con, Met-Art’s beauty is in young, innocent women being naked for the camera. Met-Art’s biggest hurdle is keeping those scees from all being similar. They mostly succeed at that, but not fully. I really can’t offer a suggestion.
If quality is important to you then you will be happy to knoow the photo resolution is near the top of the industry and while the videos are relatively boring, those are downloadable in high definition.
Multiple daily updates keep things fresh enough.
The positives far outweigh the cons, but I will say the longer you are a member, the more noticeable the flaws are. The models are all attractive, but with a long-term membership you may start to feel like you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all.
That colud be the best advice I can give you about Met-Art. Join it in bursts instead. Even saying that, it’s not a bad site to start your own porn collection.
The photos can by downloded in zip fles and the videos can be downloaded in multiple resolutions and quality. This is one of the few sites that I even mention the backgrounds and settings about.
There is a trial going on currently where they give you access to one or even ten of the Met-Art sites. It’s a good way to get at least a sampling of their content. Each site seems to have a boundary up. Though Met-Art is more explicit than ever, it still often doesn’t even reach masturbation. The trials to their other sites may also show you which models obviously are not comfortable doing anything more than teasing on camera.
The toughest part of reviewing Met-Art is no other site than I know of has such a low dependency on their videos. It has made me wonder why they even film videos. I know there is a market of video lovers, but these videos aren’t going to impress a video lover. The videos even look like someone recorded a video of a photographer taking pictures of the models.
Met-Art is still at the top of the heap in porn photogrephy, but if videos are the least bit important to you joining a site, you may want to skip Met-Art.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A truly enduring porn site that may get lost in the Met-Art network
Viv Thomas was one of the originators of internet, softcore, passionate female porn.
Updates several times per week.
There are over 5,000 videos and photosets.
Everything is downloadable, including HD videos and photosets.
That great navigation all Met-Art Network sites have.
Cons:
Some of the scenes feel old, but may be just released. It has something to do with the camera or filter they use.
It has been noted before in my reviews and other reviews -- the male/female content has been removed.
Bottom Line:
Viv Thomas hides itself well on the Met-Art Network. Nearly every site on the network is softcore or all-female. Viv Thomas was shooting heartcore porn before it became popular and this continues that tradition. I still do not know why they removed the male/female scenes, but it may have something to do with those videos being older and unable to remaster to 2023-quality standards.
Even without the male/female scenes you are getting very good solo and lesbian porn. It is a strange niche to focus on when talking about porn, but no one does passionate kissing better than Viv Thomas. If you like seeing two pretty women kissing each other to full arousal, you will not be disappointed in the content on Viv Thomas.
I won’t claim to know what Viv Thomas was trying in his heyday, but it does look like he tried to bring a softer, more passionate side to porn. Many of the older lesbian videos on Viv Thomas show my point. The women, often major star European models, lose all control and the scenes take on a real feel instead of porn feel. The kissing, touching, is a major part of Viv Thomas videos.
The navigation is the standard Met-Art Network navigation. You have easy to see, read and click tabs that take you to videos, photos, models list and so on. There are not only over 5,000 combined videos and photosets, but also 5, sometimes more, updates per week.
I usually join the site around the holidays as they have the $5 per month special promo. I’ve never been disappointed with the site or content.
I could probably nitpick and say the older scenes are much better than the newer ones, but I believe that is to be assumed and expected. The big difference could be that Viv is no longer producing the scenes or the talent was better back when he was. I'm going to go with a little of both.
Those into high production and action that feels and looks real, you should check Viv Thomas out -- you might agree that it’s at least in the discussion for best porn site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Metart network. So you get a site structure that is easy to use.
-Search is good: can search by model, photographer, date posted.
-Daily update, either a photoset or a video.
-The models are attractive to gorgeous. Almost all are found at other sites in the Metart network.
-There is a short stat list for each model, showing her age, country, physical characteristics (eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, race).
-The model's page shows links to her photosets and videos at the site. There is also a separate listing of some of her appearances at other Metart sites.
-PU has a discounted price of $9.99 for the first month.
PU/TBP list the recurring price at $19.99/month, but when I click on the MetartX link from the PU site, and click on the join link, the recurring price I see is $24.99/month.
But for $9.99, you get a month's view of these lovely women, and can tell whether the site is worth a longer sub. The yearly sub is $99.95.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The site is suprisingly large.
Videos: 1270
Photosets: 1084
Models: 371
Contributing photographers: 43
-The video quality is up to Metart's exceptional quality.
-Content is exclusive.
-Videos are offered in 4k, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p.
-Photosets are offered in low, medium, high definition.
-Metart X support is one of the finest support teams of any site. I thought it was the finest, until I joined Adult Time, which has a live chat option for support. Live chat is faster than email for response. But Metart has a fast response to emails, usually within 24 hours, and has always been helpful.
-No streaming or download limits for videos or photosets.
-If you have cookies enabled, login is automatic. You don't have to enter any login details, just go to the site, and the home page opens automatically.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Lack of variety in the models. Almost all are slender, white, late teens to twenties.
Not a con for me. This is the Metart comfort zone.
-I did not find a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. However, most times you sign up for a Metart site, there is a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Rocketgate was the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've used Rocketgate for years for different subscriptions, and never had a problem.
However, even though I assume Rocketgate was the payment processor, there was also a text message that ECHST.NET 866-452-5108 is the payment processor. ECHST.NET is a payment processor
that I've never used, as far as I can recall.
-This is a minor quibble: I tried to sign up with a different email address, and a different user name. But the site recognized me, and gave me my old username and old email address.
I was trying to use a new email address, because the old email gets over 100 spam messages each day. But I decided to accept using the old email address, and old username.
The Metart network, for years, has been trying to keep each subscriber to a single username.
Which can create problems for the user sometimes.
-Videos play with soft background music. The music is not jarring, but I don't think it adds to the mood or the experience.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Basically, Metart X is a smaller, more explicit version of Metart, which is the granddaddy (or grandmother, if you're trying to be non-sexist) of the Metart network.
The main focus of the site is lovely women masturbating. Metart is strictly softcore. With Metart X, they are trying to spice up the experience, and show you the models you crave getting down and dirty. Except not too dirty, since it's Metart.
A little wilder sex would be found at Sexart or Viv Thomas, also part of the Metart network.
The Metart network, and the Metart X site, feature women that are lovely to fucking gorgeous.
The women are late teens to early 30s in age. Most models start as teens, but a lot continue into their 20s and a few are still modelling in their 30s.
What's nice is there is not a lot of obvious plastic work done on the models: they mainly appear natural: not a lot of boob jobs, not a lot of botox. MetartX is now allowing tatoos on the models: Most Metart sites removed all tatoos by airbrushing in their photosets, but I guess the Metart network is moving into the modern age where they now allow the model's tatoos to remain on view.
I personally am not a fan of tatoos, but both men and women seem to find them attractive.
If you're a fan of Metart.com, and like the models, Metart X is a chance to view some of them in a more explicit setting. Metart is a giant site, with tens of thousand of softcore galleries, very softcore videos (that are mainly boring, in spite of the lovely models), and thousands of models. Metart X features a few hundred of the same models, in masturbation scenes.
The attraction is not so much the masturbation, but watching these fucking lovely women expose their bodies for your viewing pleasure.
I definitely think that for $9.99 for the first month, the site is worth joining.
Whether you think a longer stay is worthwhile is up to you.
But just watching some of these lovely models on display, in only a few of the better videos (better, meaning you really like the model, and also enjoy the videos she's in), is more than worth the admission price.
I should add that the videos are basically artistic, erotic porn: very gentle or mild. Don't expect violence or dirt or over-the-top acrobatics. If that's what you want, look elsewhere.
The videos and photosets are solo models. They don't bother shooting two female models together. And men? Men only appear in a few of the Metart network sites. I figure Metart doesn't think most men are attractive enough to be in porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Metart network. So you get the bells and whistles of a first rate glamour network.
-You get absolutely beautiful photography.
-You get a catalog of absolutely beautiful young teen (and early 20s) models.
-You get unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Downloads are offered in multiple definitions.
-A back catalog of photosets and videos. 1656 galleries. 439 films. 533 models.
Cons:
-The main con is that the main Metart site is the main competitor.
-Stunning 18, like all porn sites, has been hurt by the covid epidemic. They are struggling to find updates. A lot of the updates in recent months have been old content shot years ago, but posted on other sites. Avril A, a lovely teen from years ago, has 39 sets at Stunning 18 in the last 2 years, that were all shot many years ago. The sets currently being released on Stunning18 are mostly from EmasPlace.com, a softcore website that closed. That was a solo model website devoted to Avril A by Thierry Murrell. Avril A was also at Metart, Erotic Beauty, and other softcore sites.
There are other models from years ago with old sets being posted at Stunning 18.
But unless you've have a vast porn experience, you won't be bothered by the older sets, since they will appear new to you.
And most of the models, like I say, are really cute.
Bottom Line:
Metart is probably the best softcore teen glamcore site in the internet. For several differnt reasons:
Read my review of Metart, or other fine reviews of Metart at the PU site.
But basically,
-Metart has probably the largest collection of photosets of softcore glamcore on the internet.
-Over 23,000 photo sets.
-Over 1,800 films. (Most films are boring, not worth watching. But that's a common problem with softcore films. No matter how attractive the model is, and some of these models are the most beautiful in the world, the scenes lack heat or excitement.)
-The fastest update rate for any softcore photo site I've ever seen. 4 daily updates, plus 6 updates on the first day of the month.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Photos offered from 270p through 1080p for most sets. They started offering 4K a few years back.
-The same low membership price as other fine softcore site. If you can get this for the same price, with so much more value, why not get the most for your money: if you want softcore glamour, go for Metart.
So that's why Stunning 18 only deserves a 90. Because it's up against Metart, which is far superior. Even though Stunning 18 is an excellent site.
Stunning 18 has fine models. The girls are cute to lovely to fucking gorgeous.
And Stunning 18 has one advantage over Metart: it can have a harder edge to the photos and videos. I saw one video recently with 2 girls and a naked guy, titled "Anastasia - Helping Threesome", I suspect this video was shot for a either a competing site or a generic porn producer and posted at Stunning 18 for an update, because the film quality doesn't seem up to the Stunning 18 standards. But then again, maybe it's my eyes that don't see that well, because I have cataracts, and the images aren't as clear and crisp as they used to be.
Sorry to intrude personal details, but the truth is, when I look at some videos, they aren't as crisp and clear as they used to be, and the effect is noticeable.
Having said that, the camera-work in this video of 2 girls and a guy is not up to the professional standards of Stunning 18. And the set is slightly cheap. And the background music is cheap. So I think this is a rental video, or a purchased video, from some porn company. They are using filler to provide more updates.
Stunning 18 tries to provide value. If you didn't have fine sites like Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy in competition, I would join Stunning 18 right away.
But these other sites are the same price as Stunning 18, and they offer far more content.
So I would join these other sites, before I joined Stunning 18.
Even though I think Stunning 18 is an excellent site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Pretty solo site that does a lot right but isn’t without some subjective flaws.
I am not usually as into solo female porn as some, but this was offered in a promo, and I came away with a similar feeling I expected to have.
The site is large and has a new update each day. The sites on the Met-Art Network release photos separate from videos and number them. Not for sure how I feel about this practice.
There is some variety in models, but it’s not a lot. Most of these models are pretty, slim, white.
Videos are unlimited downloadable and there are downloadable photo zips.
Cons:
Camerawork and music in scenes. The camerawork is a major one for me to be convinced of the models’ orgasm.
This site unlike the other on this network that I just reviewed, splits the photos and videos up as separate updates but updates them on back-to-back days. Their other site spreads those out.
Most of my complaints on this site are going to be from me believing the visuals of the woman’s pussy is crucial to seeing how it reacts to orgasm, the camerawork has problems there and some of the women also close their legs in what is supposed to be the orgasm.
Bottom Line:
I find myself highly critical of solo masturbation sites. One of my regular practices is teaching women to orgasm without physical stimulation. This requires contractions and teasing of the vaginal vestibule or introitus. This, likely is not something porn wants to talk about since it explains the absurdity behind “size matters”. Think of all those 12 inch dick unemployed men walking around with nothing more than a visual stimulant.
These scenes are incredibly straightforward and do lack a lot of the creativity I would like to see in a solo female scene. Also, not all of the scenes include masturbation, which I thought was the point of this being Met Art X. A 22 minute scene of a woman dancing around nude does not constitute porn. It doesn’t even equal tease porn. It is more like watching a ballet or artistic performance.
Once into the masturbation scenes, some have soft music, which doesn’t bother me as much as others. I know some feel this blocks out the moans and noises from the female, but you can hear those and the music is very soft. I watched numerous scenes that did this: Camera explicitly focused on the pussy as the woman masturbates, then as she starts to writhe, twist and look like an orgasm is nearing, the camera moves to a view of her from the side. I know this is explicit and maybe shows how much I am interested in the female orgasm, but I usually can watch the vaginal vestibule and tell when a woman is having an orgasm. A lot of these more glam sites choose to remove the camera from seeing that. I believe it hurts the scenes a lot. Several scenes I was very much into just lost me with the camera choosing to show the side view of the woman during what was supposed to be an orgasm. There is a reason male cumshot compilation videos are popular. Seeing another person, either gender, orgasm, can and often will bring on orgasm for the person viewing. This site would score much higher if they fixed that one part with the camera changing during orgasm.
The site is large with 1,156 videos, 970 picture sets, only 345 models, but these do seem to be top-level models. I imagine they pull popular models from their other sites to this one. The update rate is very good and there are up to 4K downloads on the videos with 6 other options, also downloadable picture sets. For an overall good package. I made a comment over a year ago about not understanding why porn with tattooed models believed it had to be as violent and hardcore as possible. I will make a similar comment here. Why not show the explicit orgasm? If the model is okay with being videoed explicitly while masturbating, shouldn’t she be okay with showing her orgasm? I may even be being a little harsh with my score, but that camera movement during the orgasm ruins the scenes for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A unique site on a network (Met Art) that I typically do not think “unique” applies to.
Updates every 4 days and is a large site.
More solo than expected and that is what makes it interesting. Women practicing, trying kinky sex acts with themselves.
The newer scenes have 4K and quality is very high on every aspect of the site.
Navigation is good, clean layout, though there are a few ads I would knock off the screen.
Cons:
I feel this way about a lot of kinkier content. Some models seem to be made for it while others are not. There is some feeling of uncomfortableness from the models. Which does hurt scenes like these.
I also am a member of Met Art X and there is a lot of similarity between the two with just the kinky act being the separating factor.
Videos too short.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site on a promo and am glad I gave it a try. As a relative newcomer to the glam porn sites, I have a lot of preconceived notions about any sites that have the word “Art” in them or that are associated with sites with the word, “Art” in them. This site is associated with the Met-Art network.
The size of the site was the first good surprise. There are 1,330 scenes/films, 2,879 picture sets and 1,247 models. They update every 4 days making the numbers go up relatively fast compared to other sites. The videos are very good which I wasn’t expecting either, but I will say, the shortened length of these videos is somewhat disappointing. Some are even split into parts. I don’t see the reason for the parts unless it’s just to get more content to look like more updates. But maybe that is just me. I have not been easy on other sites for using this same method. It would be unfair to do so here. A good example is a scene called, “Penis Practice”. It features Antonia Sainz and this scene has a part 1 and part 2. Part 1 was released in early November 2021, part 2 was released in late December 2021. It takes on a whole new level of confusion. Part 1 isn’t a video. It’s a picture set. Part 2 is a video. I thought it was standard these days for a scene to be released with photos and video. As small of a negative as that sounds like it just feels like a move to entice only to make you wait over a month to get the video.
The good part is the scene is an interesting and sexy, even erotic show of a woman practicing how she will please a penis with her hand, mouth, pussy and that is a welcome change to most porn. I want to say that it’s the theme of this entire site. It is a look into each model’s life and how she explores her sexuality. If things were more cohesive that would make this even better (like not releasing pictures a month before the video). The majority of the scenes follow that one in style. One scene is a model testing her nipples sensitivity with pressure and if nothing else, I have to give them points for trying something different. The masturbation in the scenes does seem to be genuine and enjoyed. If you are into the pictures, the pictures are very high quality and available as zip downloads. The videos are unlimited downloads and come in 7 resolutions/formats with the last several years offering up to 4K. I’m very impressed with the content itself as the scenes themselves tell the story of what is going on. What I’m not impressed with is the lack of cohesiveness. If I download a photo set in November, but don’t get the video until 6 weeks later, I am going to forget what was going on in the photos. It seems their biggest strength could easily be their biggest weakness unless they start releasing those together. Still, it is recommended. I am enjoying the site a lot.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The master of softcore, leg, lesbian porn.
- I have been joining Viv’s sites dating back to when he had two sites and I still believe it’s the best lesbian porn available. From a man’s perspective.
- Looks like there’s a daily update of either photoset or video, or it’s really close.
- 1,113 models and they include the majority of the finest models to ever grace the Earth.
- There are now 2,195 videos and 3,390 photosets. All are downloadable.
- The ease of using the site is important for anyone that remembers the old Viv sites. Met Art now manages it or owns it. I’m not for sure which but the navigation improvement is a big part of my score.
- Good download speeds (80% of max).
- Nearly all the old videos are still here but do see the cons.
- This is one of those pros that has to be mentioned. Some of the photosets have photos that are 9000x6000. There’s nothing else to say about that.
Cons:
- Made that fast: Some of the old videos are gone. What it looks like to me is the male/female scenes are all gone. I will go into that in the bottom line. It’s not a big deal for me since I still have those on a hard drive.
- I know that Sandra Shine does some producing and she was a great model, one of my favorites but no one really captures Viv’s style. I do think the older scenes are generally better but it’s not by much. If it makes Sandra feel any better, my all-time favorite Viv scene is Pink Velvet 3, part 5, Sandra Shine and Eve Angel in the most passionate, unbelievable lesbian scene I ever watched.
Bottom Line:
I always mention DDF’s name when talking about Viv Thomas. I felt like they made the boom of 2005-2009 in internet porn, happen. I am going to start with that con. I don’t know how many male/female scenes there were on this site but one I remember very well was Jo, Eve Angel and a guy that was supposed to be a professor or something like that. Neither Eve nor Jo was known for their male/female scenes. I don’t think they had even 10 male/female scenes between them. It was more of a collector video to me. I have it on a hard drive. I don’t remember Jo doing anything with the guy but Eve did and it as common as hardcore is these days, was uncommon back then to see them in a hardcore scene. I don’t think there were a lot of male/female scenes but those were really good. If you didn’t know those were there you wouldn’t think much about it but I am mentioning it for those collectors out there that maybe lost their old scenes. I don’t see it. It could be here but I don’t think it is. The old lesbian scenes are. I thought Eve’s lesbian scene with highly underrated model Lisa C, was one of the very best lesbian scenes. I do believe Viv’s production played a big role in that. He had Eve and Lisa C meet at a hotel room and the first 5 minutes of it has them kissing, groping each other over their clothes and against the walls. They couldn’t keep their hands off each other long enough to take their clothes off.
And just a little on that Eve and Sandra scene. They are either being nurses or maids. The scene starts and they get so into the sex it really looks like Sandra instinctually sticks one of her fingers in Eve’s butt. That was not common for Eve back then. The scenes felt like Viv directed how things started and he kind of let the models start improvising and adding, no subtracting.
It is still that good of a site. I know subjectivity plays a part there. If you are looking for what looks like real sex, this is it. If you couldn’t see what was going on, you wouldn’t know a cameraman was there.
The site is very large with excellent navigation. There used to be I think this is how it was split, there was a Viv Thomas photos site and a Viv Thomas videos site. It’s all here now and they’re updating daily. I hate to say I think it’s even better than Met-Art but I do and it is based on my preferences. The models are more built on Viv Thomas. This is the pinnacle of lesbian porn. I have been told to say from a male’s perspective. Maybe it’s not the most realistic lesbian porn but from a male’s perspective there are at least two very pretty, naked, sexy women, rolling around, kissing, licking and fingering. That is what separated Viv Thomas. I don’t think he tried to do anything except show off multiple women at one time. It’s what nearly every lesbian site up to the ones on Adult Time, tried to do. Most failed.
There are nearly 2,200 videos and the newer ones do have 4K. It’s all downloadable. There are nearly 3,400 photosets and as told in the pros, some of these go up to 9000 long end on the photos. The quality is there, the quantity is there, the name behind it. There’s not any, “Squish her face with your foot” or “rip her asshole open”. Having said that, it’s still not what I would call softcore. These women go at it. There are still some solo scenes too. They have good tags. Once again, just missed 100
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The legendary site that reminds me of how old I am. It will be explained in the bottom line, hopefully, with some humor.
- Very pretty models, I once theorized these sites have a farm somewhere where they grow these models.
- It’s one of the few sites that I think you could buy a 1 year membership to and still not see everything. It’s that big of a site. Numbers in the bottom line.
- The switch to more explicit, more pink showing, was to me, the biggest step in porn. I will tell about my first review of Met Art way back in 2007.
- No site makes a set of plain white sheets, prettier. I’m speaking specifically about the newest update, Sex and Candy featuring Katherinne.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Very good navigation for a site that really could be navigational mess.
- Always easy to join and cancel, you do it right from your account page.
Cons:
- The videos. They could remove those and I wouldn’t even notice.
- This is a classic con that goes back to the pre-2010 days, of saying how many women have the same name? My favorite one and it’s me just coming up with a not really con, con. They have 23 models named Olga. I have never met a woman named Olga. See my theory about that farm? That could be a con for someone that’s newer to porn. That goes into overwhelming.
Bottom Line:
In 2007, I joined Met Art for the very first time and returned to Porn Users, reviewed it and gave it a 78. I still remember typing, “This isn’t even porn.” It wasn’t like I was a lover of hardcore porn. My favorite model at the time and a top 3 all-time, Eve Angel, has photosets on Met Art. Those were the tamest photos I ever saw of Eve. Eve made a career of being a softcore model. Using the word, “tamest” with a softcore model, it shows how softcore Met Art was. It still is but it has evolved. The photos are not really that much more explicit than they were 14 years ago but they are no longer the tamest. Keep in mind, we are talking about 2007, back when no one had heard of networks and mega sites.
I know that Met Art won’t mind me saying this since I’m also going to review it. Viv Thomas was the standard for me. The more current Met Art is like Viv Thomas without sex. They should take that as the highest compliment. They have learned to photograph explicit poses without being trashy. One of the things I believe video porn loses is the photos of a young model spreading her legs and showing how wet she is. You get that on Met Art. Especially if you view their largest photos.
The one complaint I usually have with Met Art and still do but I’m not listing as a con is they don’t keep the models in clothes long enough. A lot of the photosets start nude. Give me one picture of her in clothes. That is what makes softcore porn … porn. It crosses from “this could be in a R rated movie” to “This is going to be in an X-rated movie.” Don’t question my farm theory either. If people can believe that the politicians are good, I can believe there’s a farm raising these near perfect models.
I don’t like being negative about their videos and really think the nicest thing I can say is if they removed the videos, I wouldn’t notice. We’re just overflowing with video porn these days. When I join Met Art I don’t even think about videos. I think I’m just old enough that I was raised around porn magazines. Very few if any sites can compare to Met Art in overall quality of pictures. There are a few sites that typically have models I may prefer over Met Art’s. I do as my name says, like exotic women and they have exotic models on Met Art but not as many as some sites. It’s funny that I talk about softcore, I do like the very explicit pictures and Met Art doesn’t have a lot of very explicit. I will even explain very explicit, masturbating, milky orgasms, Met Art doesn’t quite that far. I don’t expect or want them to change that for me. They are the best at what they do. I forgot about the age part. This site makes me feel old. I reviewed this site 14 years ago. That means some of these models were 4 when I reviewed this site the first time! The models look young. They are young but they keep that young look unlike a lot of porn sites do with their models. Also forgot to add that it’s nice to see the trimmed V pubic bush return.
The numbers always matter with me: I’m going to get the videos out of the way, they have 1,866 videos. Those are high quality videos. I wouldn’t make fun of you for watching them. I just prefer the pictures on Met Art.
There are 23,370 photosets. I’m typing in MS Word and am getting a peek at nice V pubic bush under the typing box. It’s distracting me. That number is the whole reason to join. I think 1,000 photosets is impressive. You then get the quality and resolution and yes to the snobby ones, some are blurry, nothing in the world is perfect. The photos are nearing 7000 long end. I’m in a joking mood. Maybe we should photograph all women’s boobs in 7000 long end pictures? It would stop implants. I guess we could work naked men into the 7000 long end photos and we wouldn’t have as many angry men running around. The pictures are huge. One boob takes up the whole screen. That’s why I don’t need the videos.
There 3,909 models. And besides being a review this is how you make a softcore porn site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It was once my highest rated site, then fell out of favor, seems to be taking a different turn now.
- The growth of this site has to be one of the most impressive and fastest we have seen. Daily updates currently and the quality is as high as you get.
- As of 12/7/21: 785 models, 1,573 videos/films and 2,036 photosets.
- Everything is downloadable and as far as I know, unlimited. I don’t download enough anymore to really know.
- While its big sister site Met Art has become more explicit in recent years, Sex Art has been more explicit since the first scene. I will focus a little more on that in the bottom line.
- The technical quality is very high and it will be in the bottom line.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
Cons:
- Don’t hate me for saying this. I still don’t like the hardcore scenes. I like hardcore porn as much as most do, but hardcore porn is everywhere. I would be fine with this being a solo/lesbian site.
- Their memberships can be confusing when upgrading or adding. I will explain that in the bottom line since I know they usually have a webmaster that checks in here.
Bottom Line:
I remember the days of thinking Met Art could be a lot more than it was. I even remember making comments about Met Art at least getting the attention of my side that likes teasing. Sex Art came along and showed what Met Art could be. It was kind of surprising to me that Met Art then started shooting more explicit photos. It was like Sex Art tested the waters. The early years of Sex Art were kind of messy. They were trying too hard. Take that as a compliment. I don’t remember who said it, “It’s still just porn and about nudity.” Sadly, that’s probably as far as we will get in our lifetimes but will say Sex Art does a very good job of blending the more innocent porn with the not innocent porn.
I don’t feel like much of an explanation is needed for why I don’t like the hardcore scenes. It’s just a feeling I have. It’s not bad hardcore porn. It’s just kind of there. I don’t like mentioning other sites in a review of a different site but I feel the same way about FTV adding hardcore. And didn’t ALS Scan try it too? The hardcore on sites that are rooted in softcore, to me, is a bad marketing idea. I will just say take any hardcore major network you know of. Would their fans be happy about a solo scene?
The bad part is it does seem like the number of hardcore scenes are increasing. Or I should say the percentage of new updates featuring hardcore scenes is increasing.
The confusing part with memberships and add-ons. There’s a good chance I was able to join two of their other sites on Black Friday prices. I joined Viv Thomas and Met Art for $5 each. I was thinking maybe I would add ALS Scan since I haven’t been on it in a long time. I clicked to add it and received this choice: $39.99 per month or $100 for a year. I haven’t paid $40 for a site since those very rare Japanese sites. And have never seen ALS Scan priced at $40 per month. I just thought it was strange that I was able to add those others at $5 per month. Not that I think ALS Scan or any of these sites should be $5. These sites stand on their own strongly at even $20 per month.
My favorite part of Sex Art are the pictures. The newer photosets are downloadable in multiple resolutions but the high one has photos that are 5800x3800 resolution and they have a nice blend of portrait and landscape orientated photos. The settings are usually pretty and even will use the word, neutral, so you don’t get the clash between the models and colors in the background. I don’t even know if it’s a compliment to tell a Met Art site its pictures are my favorite part. The videos are as impressive in technical quality at 4K, 1080, 720, 360 and 260. The videos have some story to them but are not as long as I expect from story-driven porn. Most of the newer hardcore videos are under 30 minutes. I’m going to just focus on one and it’s a newer one. It is titled, “Just Relax” and the screencap has a very nice view of Lilly Bella standing, pulling her panties and it’s from behind her. That looked like it was going to be a solo scene. I then clicked the video. I stream everything before downloading. The scene starts with male Maxmillian Dior. I hate showing my impulsive side this much but I just closed it. If you wonder why I would think it was solo, it’s the only one of the last 20 scenes that just shows a female in the preview screencap.
That is going to be the problem I have. From what I can tell, Sex Art is now almost exclusively hardcore male/female or lesbian. I am guessing the new solo content is on Met Art X, which is fine, but it shows how much this site has changed (for good and bad, in my opinion). I do know the bigger picture is to just join the entire Met Art Network and then you’ll get everything.
I’m not going to knock the score down on it just for that personal preference. The content here is very good if you like hardcore that’s not offensive (which I do) and aren’t expecting the solo scenes that used to be more common on here. I was starting to think I just thought there was less hardcore on this site but using the tags, it shows 291 “boy-girl” scenes and all 291 of those with that tag started in 2019. The site has been around since 2013 or 2012. There’s a chance the tags aren’t 100% accurate but you can see that the last two and a half years have produced nearly 300 boy-girl scenes.
It’s still a top quality site, preferences aside, I just can’t score it as high as I used to. This used to be a 96-99 site for me.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Probably the finest softcore photo site on the internet.
-The largest softcore photo site on the internet. See the bottom line section for the site statistics on the number of photo sets, the number of videos, the number of models, the number of contributing photograpers.
-Updates daily with 4 new items (photo set + video), except on the first of each month, when there are 6 new items.
-Photo sets are offered in a zip file of low, medium and high definition.
-Videos are offered in 270p through 4Kp for the last several years. Before that, the maximum definition offered was 1080p.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-Navigation is basically simple. Good search engine, tags for photo sets and videos. I mainly use the search engine to search for a particular model's content.
Cons:
The cons are basically minor.
-Years ago they had a simple way to list the contents by year and month. They still have a listing for year and month, but it takes more clicks to use it.
-I don't know why, but I find many softcore photo sets can be erotic. But it's much harder for a softcore video to be erotic. Many of the videos at MetArt are boring, in spite of how lovely the model can be, in spite of the model exposing her naked flesh.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-MetArt is a huge site. It can be overwhelming when you browse through the massive amount of photo sets and videos. It's a psychological effect, but it's easy to devalue the photo sets of these beautiful models because you have access to thousands of these sets.
-Most models range in age from 18 to about 30. Most models are white. Most models are slender to medium build. If these model characteristics fit what you're looking for, you're in luck. But some people want greater diversity.
Bottom Line:
MetArt is a softcore site. Don't join expecting hardcore content, you will be disappointed.
It features a collection of thousands of the most attractive women on the planet.
Site stats:
Films: 1,839
Galleries: 23,019
Models: 3,878
Photographers: 291
MetArt is probably the finest softcore site on the internet. Because of the low price (it's the same price as Femjoy, MPL Studios, and other fine photo sites), the massive amount of content, the easy navigation.
During the holidays, you can often find a special discount of $10 to $15 for the first month.
Which is not the case with Femjoy, MPL Studios, or other good softcore sites that only rarely offer a discounted price. Hegre usually offers $15 for the first month during holidays, but MetArt beats Hegre on amount of content, the update rate, and I prefer MetArt over Hegre for its content. I saw a special offer for a Labor Day discount of $5.00 for the first month for MetArt, which is a great price.
MetArt has excellent customer support. They will normally respond to an email within a few hours, and they make a real effort to solve any customer problems.
If you haven't joined MetArt before, and you enjoy softcore photos, I strongly recommend joining MetArt.
It's the finest softcore site on the internet, in my opinion. The beauty of the models, the massive amount of content, easy navigation, excellent customer support, make this the finest softcore site I've ever joined.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Simple, basic, non-glamour, softcore solo photo site.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Navigation is simple, based on this is a photoset only site (except for some "Staff Selection" videos and photosets which cost extra to download).
-You get low, medium and high definition download and online viewing of the photosets.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-No videos (except for the limited "Staff Selection" videos, which cost extra to download.
-The number of photos per set is surprisingly small. Often less than 50 photos in a set.
-Slow update rate. Down to about 2 sets per week. Used to be 5 sets per week, years ago.
-High membership price. Used to be $10/month or less, years ago. Then, in 2016, MetArt raised the price to $30/month or $100/year.
-No bonus sites (except for the live cam shows).
-The photos are high quality, but use a simple, basic style: solo female model, very simple indoor or outdoor setting, non-glamour. A set can start out with a girl wearing inexpensive clothes, or can start out with the girl already nude. But it's not a tease or strip, you are just viewing nude photos of the girl walking around, lying on the floor, I mean, very simple poses.
-Pre-ckecked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Goddess Nudes was started in 2010 by Eolake Stobblehouse, the same man who started and ran Domai for many years. Goddess Nudes was supposed to be a slightly sexier version of Domai.
Where the girls show a bit more.
I guess I'm blasé, because I can't really tell the difference between Domai and Goddess Nudes.
Both sites seem, to me at least, to feature softcore nudity.
Both sites mainly feature solo female models, who either disrobe for the camera, or start off nude.
There are no men in the photos.
The philosophy behind both sites was the innocent enjoyment of nude women. Sharing their beauty. Their joy of living.
I think of myself as a meat and potatoes guy. Maybe a purist or connoisseur could tell the difference between the two sites. I can't tell. To me, both sites are essentially similar. The main difference is that the two sites have different names. But any content from one site could have been posted in the other site.
In the same manner, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are three different sites. Sharing many or most of the same models. Sharing many or most of the same themes: teen female nudity and sex, softcore and hardcore. The content at any one of the three sites could have been posted at the other two sites. To illustrate this point, a video posted at one site has, in the past, had the accompanying photoset (the photoset that was made during the shooting of the video) posted at the other site: For example a Wow Girls video had the photoset made during that video shoot posted at Wow Porn. And vice versa. So the sites not only shared many or most of the same models, but also shared the same themes, photographers, technical crew, etc.
The above is not a criticism of any of sites I mentioned. Domai and Goddess Nudes are fine sites.
All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are fine sites, and the three sites are one of my favorite porn networks. Currently, the three sites are marketed as a single network: you join any one of the three sites, and you get access to all three sites. And for several months now, you also get access to Ultra Films, another fine site with the same models from what is now called the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn).
The Wow network used to be called the Diesel network years ago.
Wow network plus Ultra Films have been having a special for 6 months or more: you can join the Wow network and Ultra Films for $70/year. Which is a great price: I paid more than that for the Wow network, and I paid a separate membership fee for Ultra Films. And now you get all 4 sites for less than I was paying for Wow network. For less than what I paid for Ultra Films.
I'm sorry I'm going off-topic in this review. But if you haven't ever joined the Wow network before, or if you have but aren't a current member, I highly recommend joining the Wow network plus Ultra Films, if you can find the special discount of $70/year for the 4 sites.
That's if you are a fan of lovely young teens in hardcore action. With some softcore content, as well, but mainly hardcore action.
Going back to Goddess Nudes. Goddess Nudes is softcore nudity.
Like Domai, Goddess Nudes is photoset only. No videos.
Let me explain about the no videos statement: there are a few videos at the site. But they are listed as "Staff Selection". This means that to download any Staff Selection video you have to pay extra to download it. The same Staff Selection videos are also posted at all the MetArt network sites. So the Staff Selection videos are a feature of the MetArt network of sites, and not basically a feature of any one individual MetArt network site.
Also, if you are a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you can download all the Staff Selection videos, without paying extra. But that's only if you are a lifetime member.
To become a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you normally have to pay $400 to $800, which is a one-time fee. Lifetime members of a site have free access to that site.
With full lifetime streaming and downloading privileges.
The same setup and features of Domai are repeated at Goddess Nudes: you get limited physical data on the models, but no bios.
The update rate used to be 5 updates per week. The same as Domai.
But like Domai, the rate has slowed to about 2 updates per week.
Most of the models are slender white girls, late teens or early twenties.
From the website, the following stats are shown:
Number of photosets: 2634
Number of models: 1143
Contributing photographers: 143
Photosets contain from 30 to 100 or more photos. But most sets are under 50 photos.
The photography is excellent, but it uses a simple, non-glamorous style: Not a lot of make-up on the models, the clothing is simple, not expensive.
You get a mix of indoor and outdoor shoots.
Strictly softcore. Solo women only photoshoots. No men allowed.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE FIRST REPLY SECTION:
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large amount of content. Domai was started back in 1997, so it was one of the earliest softcore photo sites on the internet.
-Instead of the high-gloss glamour style offered by many photo sites, Domai gives you basic nude softcore photos of young women (18 years old and older). Very little air-brushing that I could tell.
-The girls are mainly attractive to very attractive. Many of them are featured in other MetArt sites, as well as other photo sites.
-You get many of the same contributing photographers from the MetArt network, so you do get some variety of photographers, except that the overall style is simple nudes, simple costumes, nothing glamourous or exotic. Strictly softcore.
-There is a zip file for photoset downloads in low, medium, and high definition.
-Content is exclusive.
-There is a nice mix of indoor and outdoor sets.
-Codec for the photosets is efficient. The high-definition downloads are less than 300 MB, and the low-definition downloads are usually 10 MB or less
Cons:
-The main con is the price. Domai used to be, many years ago, a low-priced site (less than $10/month) that offered softcore nude photos. But it's now a fully priced site. $29.99/month, or $99.99/year. As a low-priced site, it was worth joining, because it has a large collection of nude models shot in a simple, non-glamorous style. But as a full-priced site, I would hesitate to join, because there are so many competing sites offering glamour-style photography.
-Photo only site. No videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join.
-They are running out of new photosets, so they are using some older content shot years ago.
But unless you've been a longtime porn addict, you probably won't realize that some of the content is old.
-The online slide-show mechanism is acceptable, but could be improved. You get a cropped photo with a large amount of black-space on both sides of the photo.
-Only basic data is provided on a model. Model's age when the set was posted, a few physical attributes. That's it.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Note: the downloaded model data sheet says the age shown is the age of the model when the set was shot. But it's really the age of the model when the set was posted. Which is obvious if you've followed some of these models, who look like teens in the photos, but the stated age is in their 30s. So unless these models have discovered the fountain of youth, you figure the site (and many other sites, due to covid) are using old content and posting it as new updates.
-Due to covid, the rate has slowed. It used to update 5 days a week, but now it's one new update every 3 or 4 days.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Domai offers a non-glamourous, basic softcore approach. Many years ago I was a member off and on. The catalog of models was the main attraction, combined with a low-priced membership.
But since MetArt took over the site from the original founder (Eolake Stobblehouse), they've raised the membership price, and it's now as expensive or more expensive than most glamour-style photo sites.
So in spite of the attractive models, I would hesitate to join the site.
Unless you're tired of the glamour-style approach many photosites use, and want something more basic.
Domain is a photo only site, no videos. So that could be a negative for some.
Also, the site is extreme softcore only. No masturbation or explicit scenes.
Site design is simple and basic. Which makes navigation easy.
Back when the original founder was running the site, it used to have more features: short erotic fiction, articles on how to enjoy life and erotic photography, a loyalty program to make membership even cheaper. But that was all dropped after MetArt took over.
Because some of the models are so lovely, and many of the rest are attractive, the site might be worth joining for a month or so.
But there is too much competition, both softcore and hardcore, for this site to stand out.
I'm giving the site a score of 85. Because I have fond memories of the site. But the price ($29.99/month) makes it expensive.
They have 1,227 models and they are of different looks, ages and builds.
There are 1,264 videos and 2,813 photo sets.
Thankfully, the archive of content is bigger here than most of their sites, they are only updating The Life Erotic every 4-5 days.
All videos and photo sets can be downloaded and I can confirm as much as possible there’s no download limit. I have about 80% of the content from the site.
Something you do not see as much on the Met Art sites is rubber/latex clothing, it adds an edgy feel to what can seem like a clinical group of sites.
174 of the scenes are lesbian including some group. The rest are solo.
Cons:
It doesn’t feel like a con in 2021 since so many sites are no longer even updating, but I wish they could speed the updates up a little. As it is, you can expect 7-8 updates per month.
They don’t have as many lesbian scenes these days. I don’t know if that’s a byproduct of Covid or not, but it’s also not a deathblow con.
Bottom Line:
In my recent trip through the world of Met Art, I have realized a lot of sites are happy (meaning the majority of their customers are too) with sticking with a tried and tested formula. The Life Erotic is Met Art’s Henry David Thoreau’s man who who marches to the drum he hears no matter how far away. It’s still mostly just women masturbating or the 174 lesbian scenes, but the mold is broken here. It’s not a criticism of Met Art or their sites. The models are gorgeous, young, very fit, some even look a little skinny and that’s coming from someone who was under 100 pounds last year. The Life Erotic’s newest update even shows a perfect example of what I mean. It’s the former superstar European model Blue Angel. My first memberships to porn sites included 21 Sextury which had a solo Blue Angel site on it, she was a young, slender model back then. She’s now in her 30s, has filled out more and no longer looks like the innocent flower waiting to be crushed by the porn industry.
One thing I normally would not talk about as a positive or negative on a porn site are the descriptions of the scenes, but the descriptions on The Life Erotic tell some perteinent information like this new Blue Angel scene is produced by another former superstar European model Sandra Shine, who I know also produces some on at least one other site. It makes every scene, especially the newer ones, worth looking at, reading the descriptions of and surprisingly adds a lot to the content. I do believe this is the most explicit of the Met Art sites unless you count ALS Scan and I think they are about equal.
The site is large with a combined 4,000 plus videos and photo sets. All can be downloaded in high quality and there are no limits. You also will get the broader range of model types on this site. I believe the update schedule is somewhere in the middle ground since it’s hard to to complain about a site updating every 4 days when most sites are not currently updating at all, but most of the Met Art sites are updating daily. If the update schedule was better the score would be a little higher, there’s not much room to go up.
They do score extra points for being more creative than any of the other Met Art sites except maybe Sex Art which may be too creative at times. The masturbation on The Life Erotic is more “erotic” to me. It could be the models are a little older than the other Met Art sites, it could be their outfits which sometimes include crotchless bodysuits and masks. This is not going to be meant how it sounds. There’s more meat on the bones here and that has nothing to do with the models’ builds. There’s more to the content. This is easily one of my favorite sites.
It’s so high on my sites I was planning on just joining it and ALS Scan which I like almost as much as The Life Erotic, but there was a special offer for the entire Met Art network and I took it. I’m not surprised The Life Erotic and ALS Scan are still my favorite two sites on that network.
The videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p all are mp4 files and they also offer a WMV and DivX download. I know what WMV is, but really don’t know what the DivX is or why it’s offered. The photos can be downloaded in 3 sizes. The biggest sizes are over 4000x2600.
It’s very close to a perfect site for me and I think it earns a “seriously underrated” mention. The only thing I would change besides speeding up the updates is I would maybe push the envelope a little more with some light bondage. They have the outfits on for it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Young, slim, pretty models doing all sorts of things to themselves.
464 models on the site and these are mostly pro if not all pro models. I don’t know a lot of models by name, but recognize most of these.
There are an incredible 3,250 videos and 3,494 photo sets.
They are averaging an update per day, these do alternate between photo set update one day, video the next and they are not of the same model.
The videos and photo sets are downloadable and I have not seen anything about limits.
The quality of the videos and photos is very good.
Cons:
These young women look more like I do and there does not seem to be a break in slim, small boobs, small butts, they are also all shaved.
It is an older site and you can see a difference in the performance quality by the models. It is not a big difference, but if you watch an older scene it seems better than the newer scenes.
Bottom Line:
I strayed too far from my comfort zone last month. While I do not consider myself a lesbian or bicurious even; I do enjoy watching women masturbate. I believe it is a deep fantasy in my head they can see me too. The scenes on here change a lot if you scan through the years. Most of the newer scenes are fingering, small the average size dildo, standard vibrator or the wand-type vibrator. The older scenes are more explicit and you see more fisting, larger dildos and the models -- in my opinion -- pushing themselves to their limits. It is not really a complaint. It is just a difference I notice.
The women are mostly all attractive, cute ones, some are very pretty, some are gorgeous. Can I imagine this is what I looked like nearly 20 years ago? There are some lesbian scenes and I wish there were more. The lesbian scenes on here are very good. I did as other reviewers mentioned and checked out the island vacation videos. I would pay for a site with just those type of scenes on it. Those are excellent.
This site is a technological wonder in its quality. The photos I have downloaded have all been at a minimum of 4000 plus x 2500 plus, with some being even bigger. The picture quality is good enough to impress me and I am not usually into pictures. The models make the picture sets good. They seem to all be into teasing and being playful, then turning to a dirtier, naughtier side later in the sets. One of my all-time favorite sites -- Nubiles, could take a few lessons in photographing young women from this site.
The videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p and separate WMV and DIVX/AVI versions too. I believe the photo sets are consistently better than the videos. The videos are much better than the softcore sites I am used to, but I am thinking this -- young, slim, small boobs, small butt, all shaved, combined with just solo masturbation makes the videos seem similar. They do have some solo videos where they do more with the way the scenes play out, but it was -- again, in my opinion, better in the older scenes. I have the same complaints with the other top softcore sites too.
The site is huge. There is no way I could go through all this content in a month. Combining photo sets with videos puts the total number at over 6,700. This is one of those sites I would not complain about if they were not updating.
The Behind the Scenes videos helps that video number out, but this goes back to the photo sets being as good as the videos. The Behind the Scenes videos are as good as the regular videos. You can tell this site cares about their quality and the models enjoying themselves. It shows even more in those Behind the Scenes videos.
This site really impresses me, but I would like to see more lesbian scenes and more of those vacation scenes. Something else I really liked about it is most of the models have a lot of scenes/photo sets. I believe that shows best by looking at the total number of models at 464 with 3,200 videos and 3,400 photo sets. Some of the models have more than 10 videos and 10 photo sets on here. It is interesting to me to watch how the models change from scene to scene. I do not think they film all the scenes of each model on the same day or in a week even. It looks more like they bring models back months, even years later and you can see how much the model has progressed in her confidence. One of my favorite sites. I will have to watch for a year special on this one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of the most conflicting sites for me and I consider that a positive.
They have 736 models and I would say -- in my opinion -- they have the most attractive collection of models of any site I have been a member of. Even their male models are very attractive.
There are 1,462 videos and I am focusing on that since it’s where a lot of my conflicting feelings come from. I won’t list it as a con, but the scenes are too short.
They have 1,895 photo sets and because of the conflicting nature of the videos, I often find myself more interested in the photos.
All videos and photo sets can be downloaded with no limits.
Daily update of either a photo set or video. It alternates day to day.
Cons:
They have tried several different angles at creating unique content, but seem to always pull the plug on them. “Fan Fiction”, “Girls Love Sex” to name a few.
The male/female scenes are my least favorite male/female scenes from any site. I doubt I have ever used this word to describe a sex scene or ever will again -- stodgy. I’m even happy that most of them are short.
Bottom Line:
Sex Art is a site I want so bad to love and I do like a lot of it, maybe even crush on it some too, but have yet to reach that love feeling. While I didn’t list it as a con it is my biggest problem with the site. The scenes are too short, maybe they’re too edited even. One of the newest scenes has three of the most attractive female models I have seen: Baby Nicols, Anya Krey and Mina Moreno. They are in what looks like a tropical, exotic jungle or forest. Excuse my American side. The scenery is beautiful. The models are all stunning and natural. The “good part” starts around the 3 minute mark of the video and the rest of the video lasts another 13 minutes. How can you go through that much trouble to get these 3 near perfect models into a near perfect location then just shoot 16 total minutes of video? At the minimum, I would say it should be 30 minutes and I wouldn’t complain if it was 60 minutes.
That problem isn’t just with that one scene. Nearly all the scenes are under 20 minutes. Are we saying that professional porn stars can’t last longer than average people? That’s why I call this a conflicting site. There are a lot of scenes I want to love on the site, but then they end. I do not think it’s a situation where the site is cheap. Their production values are as good as any site I have been on, but why are the scenes not longer? It reminds me of a review I posted last month of a site which I said about it, “They’re trying to do too much, but not doing any of it very well.” That’s not how I feel about Sex Art. I feel like they are doing everything right, but then just cut it short. Well, almost everything, I don’t like the male/female scenes on here. They do a very good job of setting these scenes up with varied storylines, but once the initial dialogue is over the scenes fall into the redundancy of most hardcore scenes.
There isn’t much you can complain about as far as the site goes unless something in particular bothers you like the short scenes do me. They have almost 1,500 videos and nearly 2,000 photo sets. The photo sets are excellent quality and oftentimes take longer to look at than it takes to watch the video. One complaint on the photo sets is they are not coordinated with the videos. The video scene I started the review with is titled, “Adventurous”. There is no “Adventurous” photo set, but there does seem to be a couple of photo sets that connect to the videos (same model and outfit).
I don’t know why they stopped attempting their different series. I thought the “Fan Fiction” series was very interesting since it goes into different fetishes, but they stopped those in 2017. If nothing else, I guess you have to give them credit for at least trying and trying again to keep improving. The newer scenes do not give me that same feeling. Maybe the market and feedback dictates that? They seem to be settled into a certain style of scene for male/female, lesbian, solo and are sticking to it.
I am going to bump my score up from the last time I reviewed it. Back then, it was one of my first reviews and I had only been joining artsy/softcore sites. Now that I’ve been through the ups and downs of very hardcore sites it makes me appreciate Sex Art more. I just hope they don’t fall into a formulaic pattern. The videos are downloadable in 4K, 1080p, 720p, two smaller versions and two lesser used formats WMV and DivX. I did upgrade to a 4K monitor/television, but I only download the 720p or 1080p versions. If you’re into scenes that end way too fast this could be your new favorite site. For me, it’s an excellent site that just leaves me wanting more with nearly every scene.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
My first time ever joining this legendary photocentric porn site.
There are an astounding 3,825 models. Most of the models are very young looking and attractive, but with that many women there will be some that may not do it for you.
The number of photo sets reminded me of why I hadn’t joined this site before. I like photo sets, but there are 22,442 photo sets. I am just sitting here letting the number sink in.
The videos are not near as large in quantity at 1,796, but of the 12 or 13 I watched, I’m not complaining. I see why others have complained about the videos not even really being needed.
They update 4 times per day which explains how they got to that astronomical number of photo sets.
Newer photo sets are a little more explicit than the older ones.
Cons:
It would take me more than a month just to see all the models. If you are really into this site and the content I highly recommend a longer membership than one month or else the size of the site becomes a con.
Could be a continuation of the previous con. The model names. How many Olgas could there really be? There are 30 on here by my count. The main separating factor is they put a letter after Olga. I am guessing it’s not their last name since they go in alphabetical order since there aren’t any repeats, it’s just Olga A, Olga B, Olga C all the way to Olga Z and they have even started adding “last names” like Rich and Miss since they run out of alphabet letters at 26.
Bottom Line:
What kind of porn user, a fan of porn, has never been a member of Met Art? The kind that knows it’s going to be way too overwhelming to even scratch the surface of in one month. That’s exactly how I feel. There are many beautiful, gorgeous, cute, every adjective you can think of to describe a woman’s looks on here, but there are so many. I’m not subtracting from their score for that. I’m just thinking about some new porn fan reading this review and wondering just how big the site is. It’s so big I would only recommend joining it for the first time if you join for a year.
What I would recommend in feedback to the site itself is to put a list of years. That way a user could just click on 2019 and see all of 2019’s updates. Going through a model list of nearly 4,000 models -- most that I’ve never heard of, continues the overwhelming feeling.
I do prefer the newer content on the site. The older content is not explicit and really isn’t very teasing either. A lot of the sets start out with the model nude and she spends the next 70-120 photos doing everything she can to cover up the parts Met Art wasn’t showing in their earlier days. The newer sets at least show everything, but you’re not going to see anything that explicit or sexual. Being a female, I don’t get as much out of just looking at a still, non-used naked female body.
The videos remind me of a lot of sites “behind the scenes” videos. I am sure there are some that are better than the others, but the ones I watched made me not want to watch anymore of them. I believe that has to be stressed. This site is for photo lovers who don’t mind if the photos aren’t very explicit. I do believe that’s more of a male crowd. I’m really not trying to sound negative about the site, but am trying to say I wouldn’t recommend it to females. In a comparison, if you gave me a site with 22,000 photo sets of young, hot men and they barely even touched their penis, I wouldn’t like it that well either. That’s an interesting situation I’m being put in. I don’t like most hardcore, but here’s gentle, very softcore content and it’s not interesting to me. I do believe their network as a whole is a good deal if you get a discount on it. I just don’t see me spending much time on this specific site. One thing I have done is if I find a model on one of their other sites I like, I do jump to Met Art and see if she has any photos on it.
The update schedule is great. The photo quality is top-notch. You can download the photos in zips. The women are as young and pretty as you will see on any site, but that just doesn’t seem to be enough for this female subscriber. Even though I am rating this higher than Met Art X, I preferred Met Art X since it at least has the women using their body parts. This is one of the first times I have ever scored a site objectively. The only points they are losing are for the videos. If you love just photos and don’t require explicitness, this site would be very close to a 100. I believe a 6 point deduction for what I’m going to call “poor” videos is fair.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
