Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Women using dildos on men in more of a dominant way or as a way to get him what he wants from her.
152 scenes make it look to be another site that’s recycling, the 2015 TBP review lists over 200 scenes. It’s still a rare niche.
Decent but inconsistent video quality, I guess these are maybe from DVDs?
Includes photo sets that are downloadable.
CCBill is the billing processor.
Cons:
The same problem I had on another site from this network. The newer videos are lower resolution than the older videos and there seems to be videos missing based on past TBP counts.
Have noticed at least 3 scenes here that’s on another of their pegging sites.
Keeps logging me out and requiring my to login with a username and password they generated which is a mixture of letters of numbers that I have no way of remembering.
Bottom Line:
This is my preferred sub-niche of the pegging niche. Not all, but the majority of the scenes are based around the man wanting to touch or have sex with the much more attractive female model. She turns it into a dominant situation where she will let him touch her, have a little sex with her – if, he lets her use a dildo on his ass.
These scenes as a whole look newer than the other pegging scenes on this network. The female models are more attractive, and some may even be porn stars. It is still hampered by the lower video quality with many of the scenes, but there are more 720p scenes on this site than any of the network’s other pegging sites.
These “couples” don’t look like couples. It looks more like a man and woman on a date, he’s overwhelmed by how much more attractive she is than him and is even more surprised when they go in his house or her house. She teases a little then whips out the dildo. Kink’s Divine Bitches is the mistress of this niche. But the scenes here are pretty good. They are not long which is something I’ve noticed with this network. You will rarely see a video over 15 minutes.
These scenes almost all feature the woman eventually getting fully nude and “allowing” the man to give her oral and to touch or suck her boobs. I think if you’re into this niche it’s a very good alternative to Divine Bitches and is one of the better sites I’ve found on the Ferro Network. There is the recycling part, but the scenes are new to me. The photo sets are a good bonus. You have short videos that even in 720p are rarely over 300MB and my collection of women sticking dildos in men continues to grow! I don’t think the cons here would stop a person from joining it. The niche itself does that. Those into this niche will look over the cons.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Pure femdom strap-on action with women dominating men.
Only 60 scenes, but this is the rarest sub-niche of the pegging niche.
About half of the videos have 720p
More photo sets than videos, maybe the guys asked the videos to be removed? This network also has a site called Strap-On Sissies that is very similar. I think they moved some of the videos from here to it.
CCBill is the reliable biller.
Cons:
I don’t think most men would enjoy this style of porn at all.
Should just be mixed with Strap-On Sissies, a nearly identical site on the network.
Updates seem to be recycled older scenes.
Bottom Line:
Have you ever watched some hulking man in porn manhandle a little teen woman and force his dick up her ass while she screams? This is the payback! It’s not as hardcore or harsh as some I’ve seen, but what you have here are female models that stick 10 inch dildos up men’s asses, with more than a few of the scenes being the man lying on his back with his butt up in the air as the woman drives the dildo up his ass.
I typically don’t care for this sub-niche of pegging, but because they’re not as harsh here as I have seen, it’s really not bad. Usually in this sub-niche the woman will do nothing for the man and won’t let him touch her. She usually won’t even give him a reason to think he’s going to get anything except the abuse she hands out. There’s a little more allowing the men to touch the women here. Not much in the way of letting him get off until she tells him he can.
One of the most common themes on this site is the woman making the man dress up like a woman and she pelts him with “bitch” and yanks his wig. Being truthful even if it makes me look mean and bad, it’s kind of funny. I keep waiting on the woman to rip his wig off after forcing him to put it on.
This is not for everyone. It might not even be for hardly anyone, unless you can take a sense of humor into it. It’s clear these men could stop the woman and most of these women are quite attractive. Some of the women even look very uncomfortable in their newfound role of dominance. Some even look like they feel bad for the guy. They should record after the scene videos. I am sure most of these women apologized to the guys. Recycling aside, it’s very rare niche content I wouldn’t have found anywhere else. Sometimes I think this type of narrow niche porn is a welcome change to the common scenes we see on other sites. I will add this part for those into this sub-niche of pegging, their site Strap-on Sissies has over 125 scenes and it’s the exact sub-niche of Strap-On Power. And those come in the same network so if this is up your alley, they have close to 200 scenes of the female dominating the man and even making him dress up like a woman.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Narrow niche content of women using dildos on men.
124 scenes, they seem to be recycling these. It’s still a high number for a limited niche.
Uses CCBill
Downloadable videos and screencaps.
This niche has two or maybe three different styles to it. This one leans towards the role-reversal side.
Easy to navigate as a whole.
Cons:
I was told when a site has scenes that are showing up as their newest scenes and they are only 480p, but they have scenes from 3-4 years ago that are 720p, they are recycling and that’s what this site has. The newest update is listed as 2/1/2020 and it’s 480p.
Poor downloading options, most videos only have one resolution to download.
Screencap downloads are small in resolution and in quantity of photos (less than 30).
Bottom Line:
This niche is done best by Kink’s Divine Bitches. I was told to check this network out (Ferro) and that it has multiple pegging sites (women using dildos on men). This one falls under the sub-niche of role-reversal style. The couples seem to be in regular gender roles, kissing, groping each other, then the woman comes up with the idea of using a dildo on the guy. She doesn’t pressure him or dominate him. He goes along with it and it looks like a loving couple just exploring their sexuality with each other. I will review a couple of their other ones that do the other styles.
I have two reasons to think they are recycling. Newer videos have lower resolutions than older videos and the TBP 2015 review listed over 170 scenes on this site. There are only 124 scenes on it now in 2020. My guess is they’ve moved some of the scenes to their other pegging sites or possibly are recycling from site to site.
I know that’s a major con, but it is a very rare niche and for someone into it, it’s better than nothing. The best video quality I have seen on here is 720p and have seen more 480p. This sub-niche is my least favorite style of pegging. It’s like two loving people having dildo up the man’s ass sex. It doesn’t mesh well to me. I feel like if a married couple was into that it would be great for them but doubt, they would go around telling everyone.
The positive for me is it’s still an underrepresented niche and besides the lower video quality, the scenes are mostly 20 minutes or shorter. Most of these scenes are only in the 200MB file size. You can build a collection of these very quickly. I would rate the couples as “okay” attractive. It does lend to the feeling that maybe these are real couples. I scored it a little higher than I probably should since I do like the niche and the ease of use of the site.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Attractive models both young and not so young.
Huge amount of exclusive content across a large number of sub-sites.
Some of the content is quite unique, for example, the girls fuck guys strapon site.
Some very hot content with frequent updates to overall network.
Good variety of niches (lovers of stockings & pantyhose are well-served) but generally the niches are pantyhose/nylons, shemale, strap-on, matures, old men, lesbian. anal and gay.
Video content can be streamed or downloaded.
Downloaded video content is 1080p HD, 720p or 480p with reasonable file sizes.
Straightforward downloading of videos which works with download managers.
Photo sets can be browsed or downloaded.
Downloaded photos are 1500 x 1000 pixel photos downloadable as ZIP files.
Good download speeds.
Straightforward site design and navigation - can navigate and search by model and site.
Scenes can be rated 1 to 5 stars.
Uses CCBill so trustworthy and easy to manage your account.
Cons:
Member sign-in is via random character username and password.
Extremely expensive unless you get a discounted membership offer.
Although updates are frequent, some of the latest updates are 640x480 videos so clearly were not shot recently, though couldn't tell if content is being recycled.
Basic streaming & performance not great when navigating through the clip using the slider (just make sure you're not downloading content from the site whilst streaming).
Suspect quite of few of the cumshots are fake.
Video files are all WMV rather than MP4 which suggests old content.
Some of the scene descriptions and model names don't match the actual scene. Some scenes have no description at all.
The download filename doesn't include any model names, so you have to add that yourself if desired when downloading.
No favourites facility for scenes nor models.
Production quality is variable across the network, some great camera work but some scenes not so great.
Bottom Line:
This network is something I had my eye on for a long time and was always curious from the clips I'd seem on tube sites, but the very high cost put me off until I searched for a discount and found a link for $19.95/month membership!
Pretty sure that all the performers are Russian - only three of them I've seen in other sites outside Ferro network.
A lot of the content you won't see on other general porn sites - the sheer range of content on offer on Ferro is something I've not seen anywhere else.
The content covers every combination within a genre, for example, the nylons and pantyhose sub-sites cover guys fucking girls in stockings, guys fucking girls in pantyhose, guys anal-fucking girls in pantyhose, guys wearing pantyhose fucking girls in pantyhose, group sex fucking girl in pantyhose, lesbian pantyhose sex, shemales in pantyhose fucking guys and girls, guys fucking girls both wearing pantyhose masks - you get the picture.
There's a lot of condom use in scenes but I'd say that most of the content is bareback.
Where condoms are used the cumshot is sometimes into the condom, which is sometimes left inside the pussy or ass, sometimes taken off and the cum poured onto the girl or into the girl's mouth or face, otherwise the condom is pulled off and he cums in her face, mouth or on her ass or body.
Quite a lot of the bareback scenes end with a creampie in the pussy or ass, and in some scenes, the girl gets dressed with the cum dripping into her undies and pantyhose.
Some scenes end with the guy cumming inside the girl's pantyhose/stockings, after which she sometimes gets dressed wearing a long skirt to hide the cum stains, and leaves.
The production quality isn't as polished as some other well-known sites, but most of the action is hot and the girls (young and old) are sexy and slutty in a demure kinda way which adds to the appeal.
Speaking of production quality, some of the scenes are very amateurish, you can see both the guy and girl looking to the director as to what comes next, but these sorts of scene are few.
Generally the unpolished production quality lends itself well to the hotness of the scenes, there are some great camera angles but in some scenes the camera hardly moves position so you don't see much close-up.
Some scenes end without a cumshot, just the guy and girl making orgasm noises then the scene ends, or sometimes the scene will cut to a wad of cum in the girl's pussy or ass, which suggests the cum has been faked.
As mentioned in the cons, the scene description doesn't always match the reality, e.g. a blowjob-only scene described as the guy "slamming his hard cock into her tight pussy" or the guy "shoots his load inside her" yet actually cums on her back.
Scenes with condom often involve it being left inside the pussy or removed and dumped on the floor or table for the lady to do something with. Also in some scenes the guy or girl gets dressed/walks off when done, leaving the other. All a bit odd but very Russian I guess.
Photosets are separate and not of the video scene.
Some of the scene descriptions are hilarious: "he couldn't stop slamming that sweet pussy until his testicles vibrated and ejected a fat juicy load into her ravaged nylon pussy" when in fact the scene ends with him cumming on her ass.
As mentioned, there's a wide range of content including lesbian, shemale and gay, with shemales fucking shemales, shemales fucking girls and shemales fucking guys. There's also strapon sex with girls fucking girls and also fucking guys, mature sex with young guys fucking older ladies, old guys fucking young ladies, older lady on young lady lesbian action, I could go on but I'm limited by available space!
There does seem to be an unnecessarily large number of sites in this network, for example the mature genre is served by, amongst others, the sites BOYSLOVEMATURES, STUNNINGMATURES, ACTIONMATURES and GUYSFORMATURES but I'm hard pressed to say how each site is different.
You may need a membership of a number of months for the sheer amount of content, but if you must absolutely have HD content, then there's not much of that here, the majority of the content being 640x480p.
One thing I noticed was a scene I found on a tube site with the Ferro site name on the watermark couldn't be found anywhere on Ferro network - don't know if there are other such "orphan" scenes?
For the full membership fee of around $85, it'd be hard for me to highly recommend Ferro network, but if all of the range of content on offer appeals to you (I didn't bother with the gay content and only a few shemale scenes interested me), then it's just about reasonable value and after a month the price drops with each successive month.
However, for the discounted membership fee that I got, I highly recommend this site - it's not the most slick or polished but the range of content and the hotness of much of the content make it a recommendation from me.
I'm happy to pass on the discount link I used if you email me via PU.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Full access 3 day trial for 8$
+A nice selection of Eastern European models.
+Content is dated and they add one new scene per week.
+There are 165 videos which can be viewed online of downloaded a single file. Resolution is 640x480.
+There are 236 photo sets which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution seems to be 1024x768 for all pics.
Cons:
-They update with one scene per week but it's either a video file or a photo file so you never actually get both at the same time. Actually it's more common to get only one type of file.
-Some of the models have multiple scenes butthey are all with the same male talent.
-There are two seperate watermarks on the videos. One of the top left of the screen and one on the bottom right.
-The videos are a little grainy and lighting is sometimes an issue.
-The makeup on some of the models does not enhance their appearance but makes them look less appealing than they are.
-Videos are quite short since they rarely get above 15 minutes and many are below that.
-There is a search by model name but you actually get the names of the models for all Ferro sites and not just this one.
(cons continued below)
Bottom Line:
(cons continue)
-There is a useless search box where you can enter a model's name and find all her videos or photosets based on the different Ferro sites but you can do the same by simply searching through the models page.
-You can only download 3 videos at the same time.
-The names of the model are not the ones they are known elsewhere on the net.
Bottom Line:
*This is not a bad site but only if you are taking the trial membership. Otherwise I think most people will be disapointed. The overall site design looks dated and could use a facelift. This is nothing new since the site looks about the same as it was when I was last a member a few years ago.
*The premise for the all the scenes is basically that females wear pantyhose and have anal sex. The bulk of the scenes are b/g but there are a couple of g/g scenes with toys or strapons.
*I was actually quite surprised to see that the videos are all quite grainy which is unusual since I have plenty of videos at 640x480 resolution and they don't have that grainy look to them. That mes a lower resolution video look worse than it should. When you add the two large watermarks on oppostite sides of the screen then you compound the problem. At least if they had picked some more discreet ones then I might not be as annoyed with them but these aren't small or discreet.
**I guess if you aren't too picky about video quality and you have 10$ floating in your pocket then you could give this site a try.**
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large amount of content
-Attractive models
-Fairly wide variety of video styles
-fairly easy to bulk download
-Uses CCBill so it's trustworthy.
-Frequent updates when considering it a consolidated site.
There are a wide variety of sites ranging from pantyhose to shemale to gay to mature. Pretty much something for everyone.
Cons:
-Way too many fake cumshots- at least 50% based on a pretty large sample I downloaded. This is always a problem with Russian/Eastern Block videos but it seems more common on Ferro sites. The fake shots annoy me more than if they simply didn't have one at all. After watching quite a few videos you begin to detect when they use a male actor for multiple videos in a one day shooting schedule.
-cost is a bit high for the full package but the content makes it more reasonable.
-I hate the random username/password. I can understand the security issue but it's a pain to keep typing in at various points. Eventually all 50 sites have the password saved. God help me if my browser loses them...
Some of the individual sites aren't updated very often and it's not easy to tell which are/are not before you pay for access. Some of them also have very few, if any, videos- just photos. www.foot-orgies.com is an example of that.
Bottom Line:
Overall it's worth the price for the first month at least. I don't know if I would continue multiple months once I've downloaded the material I'm interested in. I may sign up once every year or two and get new material.
If you use Free Download Manager turn off the connection attempt limits and uncheck the "stop on error" boxes on the Misc. screen. Once I did that the bulk downloads worked fine. You will still have to right click each video though to get it started.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
So many videos, so many sites. Yes some of them get cross listed, but for the most part they are providing a lot of specific niche material. I actually think they have a pretty smart business model, charge big up front, because lets face it people are going to rip the sites in a month or so, then lessen the fees as time goes by. It's a pretty smart thing to do. Anyone balking at the price might consider this.
Basically you get a shit ton of nylon sites, which are actually really good sites even if you aren't into the fetish. They have a lot of femdom strapon stuff, some mature stuff, bisexual, and more. The newer vids are pretty good in terms of quality. There's still very little HD at this site because they just started adding some HD stuff. I know that is a peeve for some people. However, the fetish stuff their offering is pretty unique, and sometimes it has to be more about the content than the quality. Most of the models are pretty hot too.
Cons:
There is no BDSM or Cuckold stuff here for some reason. The BDSM I get, but seems like cuckold sites would be right up their alley, or his....;)
Older vids are pretty damn old. Low quality for the low bandwidth days. They get progressively better though.
Very little search and navigation capability.
Like the others have said, you have to manually log in to each site. The problem is you have to do it with a very cryptic username and password they assign to you. That's why everyone is complaining. They're too hard to remember. Type it into a doc and just cut and paste with your browser set to remember the passwords.
Bottom Line:
Yes, it's expensive. Yes, it's worth it. Let's be clear. This is a softer domination site, so if you're looking for extreme hardcore BDSM and femdom, not a good choice for you. If you are looking for nylon fetish, feminization, humiliation, men getting ass fucked by men and women, women getting as fucked by men and women,tranny sex, mature sex, masturbation, gay and bisexual sex, then this is a damn good choice.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Models on the average are easy on the eye. Not porn star quality but not ugly either.
Site updates videos once every eight days. Not great but mentioned under the pros because other Ferro Sites are so much worse when it comes to updating.
Picture sets appear to update every two days.
Videos since 2009 (I counted 114) have been shot in HD at 1280x720p in wmv at a total bitrate of 3320kbps. Videos before that are at 640x480p.
Picture sets can be downloaded zipped, with the individual picture weighing in around 1000x1500px.
Cons:
Separate sign-ins required for pictures and videos, because the username and password are generated by Ferro and therefore very convoluted, it is an impossibly aggravating extra task to have to sign in twice to every site you receive as a bonus that also contains pictures.
The huge watermarks in the bottom right hand corner as well as in the left top corner I've remarked upon in previous previews of other Ferro sites, are present here, too, and manage greatly to add to the aggravation factor. I almost didn't bother adding this site because while the technical quality of the videos isn't too bad, they are not worth looking at with that intrusive logo staring you in the face all through the video.
Picture sets are small and not very erotic.
Download and streaming are highly erratic. My downloads started at around 1MB/s, gradually reduced to 200K/s, and then see-sawed back and forth between those two values.
No proper search engine, no model directory or bio.
Bottom Line:
This is a site I was prepared to love. After all, who, over fifty, does not like to see models dressed in nylons and garter belt?
And you get plenty of that in this site. For once pantyhose was not substituted in someone's mind for stockings and they stick to the old definition when it comes to nylons.
One idiosyncrasy of this site, or maybe two:
Most models start out naked and then get slowly dressed, rather than the other way around, also very few of them wear panties but walk around commando style under their lovely dresses instead.
This anachronism is jarring to an old-timer because nylons and garter belts belong to an era where no woman would have thought to get dressed without panties and slip.
Both picture sets and videos lack imagination, with the models looking stiff and uninvolved. Of course, it doesn't help that the videos are in a foreign language (Russian? Hungarian? Czech?) so you miss out on the context of the video as well.
Let me sum things up in a highly subjective way (in other words don't take every negative thing I have to say as the Gospel truth):
A. I wouldn't bother with the pictures. The quality is too uneven and the sets are too small. Plus the logo, even if it has been reduced to one only, is still too intrusive.
B. I wouldn't bother with the videos because they lack erotic heat as well as the tease factor, and on top of that they are being ruined by watermarks that are meant to protect their copyright but manage instead to aggravate purists like me who like to look at a clean picture with no, or at most, with a discrete logo.
The separate sign-in for the various sites is just plain dumb. Especially if a distinction is being made between pictures and videos requiring authorization by both.
If I judged this site, or any other Ferro site I got during this past month, for myself I wouldn't give any of them more than a 69 because I look and then throw away ... see humongous watermarks.
However because of their relatively good rate of update, plus the basically decent TECHNICAL quality of the videos, plus the fact that one monthly subscription will give you four sites eventually, I will give it a 79. Of the four Ferro sites I reviewed during the past month this site, despite its flaws, is the best.
BTW, the site is softcore with some toy play thrown in. A plus for me (the softcore part), might be a minus for others.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
268 videos, many in 1280x720p HD 3000 bitrate, wmv format.
Older Videos at 640x480p 2000 bitrate, wmv or avi are not bad considering the advances made in quality over the years.
Many mature ladies, some for every taste, but don't expect glamor.
All contents are hardcore which is a plus for many.
Cons:
The typical Ferro minimalism. No search engine, no model base, no scene description.
Lack of co-ordination between the various sites. I just received this one as a bonus and once again had to feed it my awkward generated user name and password. Other sites manage to make navigation between their sites easier, why can't Ferro.
The very strong feeling that the network is on cruise control without anyone at the helm. Last update to this site was in October 2011. It looks as if they have given up and just collect money now for what they have accumulated over the years.
Only one download at a time possible. Attempts to download a second one at the same time will fail.
The same HUGE watermarks as in their other sites. This is especially noticeable in the 640x480p videos with their smaller windows.
No pictures.
Bottom Line:
This site might be worth a subscription to you if you like hardcore and reasonably mature women.
The picture quality in most videos is excellent, only spoiled for me by those accursed large watermarks on top and bottom. If you don't mind those then there is enough of what looks to be exclusive material to keep you happy for a while ... especially since one monthly subscription brings four bonus sites with it.
Just be warned that Ferro must be getting ready to leave a sinking ship, judging by the rarity of updates in all sites I have looked at so far, as well as deafening silence when it comes to support.
I won't be back but Ferro might strike a chord with you, so I'll give it a 75. Not great, but tolerable.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Mostly attractive mature women.
Latest videos are in HD format at 1280x720p wmv at a bitrate of 3000. Picture is good but could be better.
Videos can be streamed.
Picture sets (All Hardcore) are crisp and come zipped.
Updates are regular.
Cons:
Updates may be regular but are infrequent. As far as I can tell, videos update every three weeks while picture sets update every two weeks, give or take a couple of days.
Content is small with 82 videos. What makes it even worse is that only about twenty of the latest ones are in HD format, the rest are 640x480p.
If you wish to download pictures you are asked for your log-in information all over again. This morning I put in the correct info four times and was rejected all four times. A request for help by support presented me with a captcha that was almost illegible and makes it necessary most of the time to keep changing it until you finally get something you can read.
Only one download at a time, if you attempt more you will get an error message.
Bottom Line:
I got this site as a bonus when I first signed up to Stunning Matures and liked the fact that they at least had streaming where you could check out the videos first.
I also like the fact that they have quality picture sets of the video shoots. I must point out though that the sets are small (50+/-) and that the average picture weighs in at 1500x1000px. Not bad but not exactly cutting edge.
The videos are typically Ferro: The technical expertise is there, but in many the heat is lacking or the premise is improbable.
In one scene, for instance, a cougar is attacking a young man with a ferocity that almost amounts to rape while he pretends to be totally disgusted by the whole thing until eventually his juices start flowing and they continue on from there.
In other scenes the couple have barely entered a room when the Mature whips off her clothes, most often behind the surprised young man's back. I know these are fantasies but these B grade fantasies are usually only found in erotic stories written by inexperienced boys.
Something that makes more sense leading up to the action would be a great improvement, it needn't be long, just a bit smarter.
One other thing that bothers me is that the boys are so often almost of the same age as the matures. Or, to give the site the benefit of the doubt, they appear to be almost as old.
Finally, my biggest beef: The huge watermarks on pictures (lower right hand corner) and videos (lower right hand corner as well as upper left.)
General impression: I suppose if you stay long enough (a month) to accumulate an extra four bonus sites then subscribing to any of the Ferro sites is not a bad deal.
Especially since my criticism of the content quite naturally is highly subjective. I realize that, without a doubt, the videos I pan might be quite erotic and appealing to others, so the site didn't get the same low mark I gave to Stunning Matures.
As for me, I have cancelled already after two days because I just can't get warm to their site set-up, the difficulty in obtaining pictures and the incredibly huge water marks. If the videos and pictures I might download from added bonus sites during the month turn out to have smaller water marks I might be nudging the score up a bit.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Nice looking mature women
+ Latest videos in HD (1280x720p) in wmv., most of them are approx. 10 - 15 minutes long and look nice and crisp.
+ Fair download speed. My normal speed with most sites is at my maximum of 2.3 MB/s while this site gave me 1.2 MB/s. Not too shabby, though and since most files are around 300 - 400 KB it's not really an issue. However, be aware that this was done with Firefox' DownThemAll, while with Firefox' native downloader the speed was more like 250 KB/s.
Cons:
- The most "bare minimum" member's page I have ever seen.
- Only updates once every two weeks.
- A total of 90 videos ONLY starting in 2008.
- Huge Watermarks in videos in lower right and upper left of videos! Very distracting and unnecessary.
- Allows only one download at a time.
- No streaming.
- No pictures.
- No search engine.
- No information on videos.
- No model list.
Bottom Line:
First let me say that the ugly grandma on their tour page does not represent the majority of the mature women, most of whom are actually quite good looking if you like them a tad older than thirty-five.
Having said that, that's almost the only really positive thing I can say about the site.
The member's page is a joke with four small thumbnails of the latest updates shown plus a section below containing page numbers, if you click on those you are taken to another page featuring another 4 small thumbnails, there's no description of the scenes themselves, simply the names of the actors and that's it ... really, really bare bones navigation.
The earlier videos (and you don't have to go back very far) are in 640x480p avi format at a 2000 bitrate. Actually, in all fairness, they don't look too bad, but could be better.
The videos themselves are typically Ferro and lack heat. They are well lighted and filmed but something is missing. The samples I have watched seemed too posed for my liking.
Upon subscribing you are being given an impossible user name and password. I copied and pasted one and wrote down the other just to get into the site where I was promptly informed that I would need further authorization before I could proceed with downloads. So back to G-Mail to click on the authorization link and I was finally a member in good standing.
One bonus site of your choice (from the Ferro network) can be added at this time, but you are once again asked for your user name and password. If you get a site that also contains picture sets (zipped) you have to sign in to that one separately as well. Awkward to say the least.
In order to encourage you to continue to subscribe you are being given an extra bonus site for every week you are a member.
Stunning matures would get no more than 70 from me*** if it weren't for the extra sites that are being added at the time of subscription and in the weeks to follow.
As I can tell by my first bonus, not all Ferro sites are as poorly set up as this one. That's a relief because this site would never survive on its own.
*** This may look a bit confused but I gave the site originally a seventy-five but reduced it to seventy because of their super-sized water marks. This major change was explained in the bar heading the review but then was wiped out by further small corrections I made to the review.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Approx 150 video sets and 200 photo sets
+ All exclusive content
+ Zip downloads for photos
+ No DRM, no download limits
+ On the whole video quality is great, the first 100 videos are only 640x480 but look good. The last 50 are HD 720P but dont look as crisp as they should (see con)
+ Download managers supported and should be used to get good speeds (~300kbps without, ~1mbps with)
+ Latest image sets are 1500x1000 and look nice. Older sets are 1024x768 and are average
+ ~75 photos per set all focusing on anal action with pantyhose
+ Great looking Russians, some famous faces but are hard to spot due to the very unique and natural style of clothing, sets and makeup.
Cons:
- Short scenes ~15 min long each
- Large watermarks. Worse on the older 640x480 clips
- HD videos use too low a bitrate (3mbps) resulting in noticeable artifacts and graininess.
- No choice of download formats, just one full clip in wmv for each scene
- No streaming
- Photo sets are separate from the video even if they are shot at same time and obviously the same scene
- Some videos waste a lot of bandwidth on unnecessarily high bitrate audio at 320kbps.
- The site has a update log but not all content is listed. On the video and picture update pages the content is not dated making it hard to see how often the site is updated
- Very basic interface. No search, no model index, no scene description, only a single scene thumbnail, no streaming. Basically no real way to see what you get before downloading the video.
Bottom Line:
Here we have another classic example of a group of people that know how to choose the models, how to dress a set, direct the action, get the best angles, choose sexy clothing and makeup etc but have no idea how to wrap a usable website around it. I am not a massive fan of the analogy but I do feel a couple are apt when summing up this type of site which, unfortunately, I tend to see a awful lot. Would you set up shop selling a Bugatti Veyron other super cars in a dealership that looks like it used to be a McDonalds? Or design the packaging of a new all singing, all dancing smart phone to resemble a tin of Tesco value beans? In a market that is overflowing with porn it is hard to choose to stay a member of a website that makes it hard to consume its, admittedly good, content. Given a single (tiny) thumbnail and the generic model names, I have no way of knowing if I like the model or scene setup without downloading the whole scene. And when I do find a model I like I have no way of searching for more of her scenes.
Bottom line: Plenty of sites polish turds. This site wraps a diamond in a natural unpolished turd. I wouldn't mind the diamond but I am not too keen on getting my hands dirty in order to get it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is going to be a long review, but this site deserves it.
The Good:
1) The main Ferro Network site is massive, I mean stunningly massive. Fifty-four main sites and four bonus sites. Even if you aren't into a lot of the kinks they offer, you'll still be pressed to get through all the ones you are into!
2) Picture quality is outstanding. A lot of care went into resolution, camera position and final selection of photos that actually make it onto the site. The picture size is large but not those massive, bloated monsters that are a bit slower to download.
3) Movie quality is also excellent in hi-res. After downloading a movie, then opening it, I could enlarge it to full-screen on my 18" screen and not loose any resolution quality.A lot of care went onto filming as well insofar as set decoration.
4) LOTS of other good aspects, but I'm limited in character count here!
Cons:
The Bad:
1) Navigation stinks. No way to search by model, date of update, etc.
2) My biggest beef is thumbnail size for both pictures and movies. I actually downloaded one of the thumbnails and opened it in Photoshop to get an exact height and width: 47x70 respectively. Absolutely horrible. I do not know why Ferro Network makes the thumbs so small, but its annoying as hell.
3) Once you join Ferro Network with your username/password, you have to sign into each and every site in their network one at a time. Very frustrating and time consuming.
4) You have to download and install a small driver in order to watch the movie after download. Its annoying, but everything works fine once installed.
5) The four 'bonus sites' are total crap. Low res movies and pictures not worth even signing it to see. One of the bonus sites wouldn't even load.
Bottom Line:
Even with the cons, its hard to beat this network of sites. Yes, it costs $85, but the amount of content you have access to is astounding. Tens of thousands of movies and videos in high quality, high res format is pretty sweet.
The models are fresh and clean without belly button rings and giant fake tits, fake hair, fake fingernails, facelifts, asslifts and all that other bullshit that seems to reign here in the American porn market.
The models also seem to genuinely enjoy their work, which is also refreshing.
The average quality porn site costs about $30 a month, but for $85 you can join over fifty quality sites. Its well worth the investment. So nix the Starbucks Cappuccino for a couple weeks and you've saved enough money!
One tip to enjoying the Ferro Network: Once you join, go ahead and join all the sites you know you will be interested in right off the bat. Let IE or Firefox store the saved user/pass and THEN go back and explore the sites at your leisure. This will save you a lot of trouble later when you've got lube in your left hand! :-)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Crystal clear picture quality! A lot of attention to detail went into the sets the ladies were performing on, as well as their dress and makeup. Very stylishly done. I know that sounds strange, we look at adult entertainment for the nookie, right? But its nice to see such attention to detail in a WWW that seems full of grunge sites. This means a lot to me as a customer. It tells me the creators of the site and the photographers care about their quality work more than just making a fast buck. Its a little something called work integrity.
Galleries are easy to navigate through, though I wish the thumbnails were a little bigger in both the picture and movie galleries.
Movies are also of excellent quality, though I wish the movie galleries displayed more than just four microscopic thumbnails per page. Just be aware that you have to download a driver first before you can view the movies at your pleasure.
Downloading of ZIP files is also nice
Cons:
Originally I was unable to get any of the movies to play after I downloaded them. Then I figured out you have to download a driver first. (Don't worry, its safe). But even then the movies would not play.
The next day I realized that after I downloaded and installed the driver, you should reboot your machine for the driver to work. (At least that was my case).
My only other con is the size of the thumbnail samples in the Photo and Movie galleries. They are literally the size of a postage stamp.
Bottom Line:
Overall a very attractive site. Very impressed with picture quality, except for the thumbs. Sets that actresses played on are very clean and detail oriented. Models themselves are very clean and attractive and actually seem to enjoy their work.
Some may think the makeup is a little heavy on some of the models, but it reminded me of the classic old Color Climax of the 1970's. (Dating myself a bit there!)
Roughly 180 picture galleries with an average of 80 pictures per. A lot of these pictures are already floating around out on freebie sites, but most are not. Most definitely worth their 3-day trial at $7.95, and even the full month membership.
A quality site that has some issues, but worth a visit. And, well, who doesn't like watching sexy women anal-bop one another? :-)
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
excellent quality of pics and videos..
beautiful russian models..
very hot and amazing scene each time..
between 6 and 10 movies and photo-sets every days..
(For that..the price of membership is justified)
Cons:
no models directory...
Bottom Line:
if you are amateur of russian porn..this sites are for you..
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Quantity, quantity
A few downright amazing pix and really nice looking models.
Cons:
This has the look of a pantyhose fetish site set up by breast men. Leg festishists like a teasing process (see Onlyallsites.com), with a gradual removing of clothes. This site has the skirt off almost always by the third pic. There's precious little leg crossing,hemline hiking, shoe dangling or foot dipping--all prized by leg fetishists.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-CCbill is their CC processor.
-They have a wide variety of sites that target specific fetishes like: anal, mature, shemales, feet, nylon & pantyhose, gays, lesbian and toys.
-They have a pretty impressive library of videos.
I stopped counting at 2000 videos because the content on the other sites did not appeal.
-Some sites offer both videos and photo sets.
-Many of the videos come in a single file but not all of them.(see Cons)
-You can download photosets as a single zip file.
-You can use a download manager(see Cons).
-They rebill at almost half the original cost.
-Some of the videos have little scenarios but it's all in Russian.
Cons:
-You have to log in to each site individualy from the main members site everytime you visit that main site. The only redeeming thing is that as long as you go back to the main ferro page and you've log on to a specific site once then you won't have to log in again.
-Once you've logged on to a site then there is no way of going back to the main ferro page except if you use the back button as many times as you did going forward or logging back on to the main screen.
-You can use a download manager but since you can only download about 4 videos at a time then why bother.(I didn't see a difference in speeds either way).
-There is no search option of any kind.
-The updates are not dated so no way of knowing if or when the sites update.
-There is only one video download option.
-Some videos are broken in 3 or more sections.
-The price is way too high for what this network offers.
Bottom Line:
-I've been curious about ferro since the moment I heard about the network. The cost always made it a near impossible option for me but since I recently won the top draw then I thought this would be the time.(No you can't use your winning for that but I could buy Christmas gifts with them and that left me some extra cash).
-This network might have been a great find about 8 to 10 yrs ago. All that porn under one roof and such an amazing selection to chose from but this is 2010 and a network that doesn't date their updates, offer better download options, lowering their exorbitant join cost should not exist.
Possibly the best thing about the join price is that it makes it very hard for most porn surfers to join and seeing the content makes me think that's not a bad idea. If they drop their price then more people will be tempted to join this site and franky that would be a bad idea for most customers.
I debated which score to give this network and I stuck with 62 only because there are still quite a few good videos. You'll just have to do some serious research to find.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Some beautiful Russian Models.
+ Excellent video quality (1280 x 720, 3000 kbps, wmv) in the most recent (approx 40) updates. Very good quality in earlier clips (640 x 480) in avi. format.
+ Good picture quality at 1500 x 1000 px in latest sets.
+ Exclusive material.
+ Steady but not frequent updates.
+ Excellent download speed if downloading one file at a time.
+ Loyalty bonuses: This site is part of a network of fifty sites and one extra site can be added as a bonus every week one remains a member. The network itself is mostly about lesbianism, gay, transsexual and transvestite life styles ... even about sissies, but does contain a few straight sites. Nice sites also for lovers of pantyhose or stockings.
Cons:
- All the scenes are in Russian and because much of the clips consist of lengthy conversations watching can become frustrating.
- Some scenes are passionate but many lack life.
- Cameramen should imitate North Americans when it comes to picking the right angles. Quite frequently the action is being veiled by one of the models' hair and you seldom get a clear view of what exactly she is doing.
- Picture sets can be quite meager (35 pix).
- Being asked for my password and user name too frequently when attempting to download picture sets.
- Allowed only one download at a time when using DownThemAll. Speed however reached over 3MB/s for me, so this was only a minor irritant.
- Large watermark taking up most of bottom right.
- No search tools.
Bottom Line:
I am impressed with the technical quality of the latest videos and have found a few already that are keepers but there are also quite a few I deleted after only watching a few minutes because the models acted too detached and lacked true passion or the video looked like a lecture on how to use Lesbian sex toys rather than two women who were truly involved with one another.
I picked up my first bonus site when first signing on, it is called "Girls For Matures" (you can pick any of 49) but I have a hard time figuring out which one of the two is the mature one and which one is the girl! If that's any indication of what's to come then I am not exactly holding my breath for that next bonus.**
Most aggravating is that I have to give a password and user name created by them (which means it is so convoluted that it can't be remembered) every time I want to download a picture set. Things are fine for the rest of the session once I do that but next time I visit it will ask me again even though I am inside the site already.
Bottom line: There are some good clips and picture sets to be had but many are just so-so and repetitive and in a foreign language to boot.
If you don't mind the $ 30.00 price tag a one month subscription might be worth your while. The kissing can be quite passionate and arousing to male and female subscriber alike.
**Next bonus arrived. I picked "Boys Love Matures" and am forced to repeat what I wrote above. The boys are frequently men in their thirties with the mature women barely a couple of years older, so beware if you go for old-young themes. Most clips are in avi format even in the latest updates. If the bonus sites I've received so far are any indication of what the rest of the Ferro network is like then I would really advise against a subscription.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- down and dirty masturbation
- vids are reasonable quality, lighting ok
- provides access to a range of other Ferro Cash sites
- navigation straightforward, easy to get to content
- seemed like it would get regular updates
Cons:
- selection was small: don't believe the tour come on
- bored looking models: clinical, disinterested
- repetitive scenes
- mostly East European girls, so not much in the way of understandable talk
- zero interaction with models
Bottom Line:
There's plenty of better sites giving you solo or girl-girl masturbation which are better value than this. Twistys or Suze would do.
On the plus side, you do get access to a big load of other content. However, that content is much the same.
It would be nice to have the girl come on to the camera. But, on sites like these I get the feeling that most of the "models" are street pros who are bored stiff. There's no need to speak English, but a bit of lust directed at the camera would help.
This was not money well spent and I will be steering clear of Ferro Cash sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Concept not bad
Cons:
- Very small site, very repetitive.
- An annoying habit of turning the camera through 90 degrees (actors go from Portrait to Landscape) which makes watching it difficult. I suppose they think this is "arty", but it is just irritating.
- Site poorly designed with no search facility.
- Very small thumbnails which make it hard to distinguish one movie from the next.
- Model names (both male and female) that are laughable considering that they are all Russian.
- All movie downloads are in .avi format regardless, with no user choice
Bottom Line:
The 3 day trial is the only thing that makes this in any way worthwhile, don't bother otherwise.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Inexpensive full access trial option.
-Videos are nice quality at AVI 640x480 or WMV 1280x720, 3200kbps. They advertise they have DVD quality. Nice videos, but not quite true.
-321 videos, about 15 minutes each.
Cons:
-No choice of download options. You get what they give you-no clips, no choice of formats.
-No support for flashget, free download manager or download accelerator plus.
-No streaming option.
-No photos.
-Very few models. You see the same ones over and over.
- Models mostly not attractive-plain and dull looking. Don't look like pros, but not natural amateurs either.
-No model information or search engine. There is no way to easily find videos of a particular model, except by scrolling through all the videos on the site. The contents are listed as the site updates.
-There is no update schedule.
Bottom Line:
The women on this site leave a lot to be desired in the looks department. Most are not even mildly interesting. I could like the natural look, but these girls by and large are just not my cup of tea.
Unfortunately, another negative is that the videos lack any chemistry between the women. Despite not being in English, it is obvious what the scenario is. You mostly get boss and maid over and over. The only plus I would mention is that the clothing is often what you see everyday and not porn style.
Much of what you do see is two women who started before the scene starts, or two women sitting and one pulls out a dildo, or they just start getting amorous for no reason. It comes across as the Eastern European version of dull gonzo.
Despite the quantity and video quality, there just isn't much that works here. It is missing those intangible, genuine, natural qualities that would make the scenes work.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Many videoes
- No download limit (a big plus)
- Nice models
- Good Video and picture quality
- Download speed is acceptable, though it can seem slow at times.
- Models reused alot or rarely
- Exclusive videoes and pictures
- No DRM
Cons:
- VERY VERY VERY expensive
- Older downloads are in parts, while most of the newer videoes are in one big file. No options are offered
- No model directery/navigation
- You basicly get access to alot of sites that is out of the niche and no use to you (etc. shemales, foot, gay)
- Updates come to rarely in the niches you signed up for.
- Camera work is annoying
- Models reused alot or rarely
Bottom Line:
First I signed up for this network because of the mature women vs young guys and the older men vs younger women niches. However you should be aware that there's alot of other sites with different niches attached to the network.
These other niches recieves the same attention as those sites there are in the niches you sign up for.
This is quite frustrating since the network is VERY exspensive and I would have much prefered that those sites where removed and the cost where lowered.
Moving on...
The mature women vs. young guys is for the most part very well carried out and there are some very good and exclusive stuff to get here. The ages differeent between the models are obvious in most cases and the acting is acceptable. Most models seem to enjoy themselves which futher add to the exciment. Futuremore there's quite alot of scenes to get and this is very positive.
The older guy vs. young girl niche is quite disappointing to me. I can't really put my finger on it but it's just not aswell carried out and alot of the scenes could imo easily have been put on any straight hardcore site. The avaliblility of scenes in this niche is also considerable smaller that the mature women vs young guys.
Updates do come, but as mention in the beginning there are other niches attached to the network and the fact that these recieves as much attention means that you can wait quite a long time to get new updates in the niches you joined this network for. In my book uacceptable.
The biggest down point about this network is that the action in some scenes can be very limited. It's gets really frustatin having a scene with the model you like and only get 5 min. or less of hardcore.
Another point of critizism is that there is no model directery which leaves you painfully have to go through all sites (you have to access each site individually) manually to find scenes of that particular model. This is time consuming since the navigation leaves alot to ask for imo.
The camera work is fine in some scenes, but can be downright annoying in others. Why or why etc. put a camera 90 degrees on the side at a doggystyle scene so you have to tilled you head to get to see what's going on? I just don't get it.
Some models are reused alot and this can be quite a blessing if you like her/him, but it can be equally frustrating when a model you like only appear in a few scenes. Again I refer to the fact that you have to go through each sites manually to find out.
A few actors really look like the could have appeared in a movie from the 50s. This annoyes me, since it for me kills the mood watchting etc your favorite girl getting it on with a man lost in time.
Bottom line: This could be a good network, if the price where lowered and the focus where put on the niches you signed up for.
If you into the niche there's quite alot of stuff to get, all you need is a fat wallet and patience since updates are slowly for the price you pay.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Site is amazing if you love character. When you join the site, you immediately get access to a bonus site, then, after each 7 day period as a member, you get access to another. There are some really bizarre bonus sites that are way not my style, but there are at least 4 or 5 that make this site worthwhile.
Models always have clothing on, and typically panty hoes. There is an appearance of role playing, but it's in another language, so who knows what they're saying.
Very little vag penetration, almost entirely anal. Definitely a sense of submission in the female models.
If you're looking for something new and want the girls to keep some clothes on, this is a must join.
The male models don't get in the way, nor are they objectionable.
Cons:
The bonus sites are really bizarre. Lots of gay/tranny/girl on guy stuff, but you don't have to add them.
Video quality isn't HD or even crystal clear, but it's decent.
Not many updates, nor a ton of pre-existing content. But again, the stuff that's on there is great.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Site is amazing if you love character. When you join the site, you immediately get access to a bonus site, then, after each 7 day period as a member, you get access to another. There are some really bizarre bonus sites that are way not my style, but there are at least 4 or 5 that make this site worthwhile.
Models always have clothing on, and typically panty hoes. There is an appearance of role playing, but it's in another language, so who knows what they're saying.
Very little vag penetration, almost entirely anal. Definitely a sense of submission in the female models.
If you're looking for something new and want the girls to keep some clothes on, this is a must join.
The male models don't get in the way, nor are they objectionable.
Cons:
The bonus sites are really bizarre. Lots of gay/tranny/girl on guy stuff, but you don't have to add them.
Video quality isn't HD or even crystal clear, but it's decent.
Not many updates, nor a ton of pre-existing content. But again, the stuff that's on there is great.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Full access trial membership.
-Bill through CCBill.
-The newest videos can be downloaded in one file. DVD quality AVI but 640x480.
-306 photo sets. Zipdownloadable 1505x1000. Mostly if not all screenshots.
Cons:
-Not many models, about a dozen. They each have multiple videos and photo sets.
-Most videos on the site, 127 out of 143, are not downloadable as one link and are 320x240.
-Not download manager supported. Very slow downloads.
-The models are not much to look at but most have nice legs. Two models have too skinny, shapeless legs.
-The site is in English, but the actors speak a Slavic language that I don't recognize. Some may see this as a plus as many sites blab too much and this can detract from the eroticism.
-No model information or search engine. There is no way to easily find videos of a particular model, except by scrolling through all the videos on the site. The contents are listed as the site updates.
-There is no update schedule.
-Uninspired sex. I was expecting an emphasis on the leg and nylon aspects, but that seems to be unimportant here. I want legs and great girls, not dull sex while wearing nylons.
Bottom Line:
This site is not better than the usual for the genre; it may even be weaker than the others. I have yet to find a good site with a legs and nylons theme. Even for a trial I was expecting more. The visuals were just not exciting. I was expecting a lot more of great legs in nylons with attractive models, but this site just doesn't deliver that elusive quality that makes a site work. Uninspired sex with plain models, with too many low quality videos that you need to download in parts. Not recommended even as a full access trial.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
