Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hairy fetishists have found paradise
If you’re a hairy fetishist, this may be the only site you ever need
Great quality videos and unlimited downloads
The pictures are super nice and can be downloaded, too
Less than 1,500 models, but over 10,000 scenes
One of the best model indexes I have used
The price reduction to $14.95 is awesome!
Cons:
I fancy myself a hairy fetishist, but even I have limits. There are many more hairy parts than pubic including legs and armpits
It's possible there won’t be enough variety in the scenes for the fans who like variety
Bottom Line:
Even though my screenname tells I’m a Hairy fan, it’s just not as extreme as a lot of hairy fetishists. My main fetish with hairy pubes is seeing them in panties. I like seeing a few stragglers peeking out from under the panties. I like seeing through panties to see a full, dark bush.
Hairy arms, hairy legs, hairy armpits are just not for me, but those are on the site and I know there is a market for that type of hairy content. For my money, this site is the end all of Hairy sites. I have often believed I complicated my own porn interests. My interest can and has started and stopped at just seeing a bush under panties.
That is the biggest reason I love this site. The first and second, maybe third focuses are on the hairy parts. I do accept and understand that may not be enough for others and that is the downside of We Are Hairy. The content really pushes and focuses on the Hairy aspect. You’re not going to see a lot of hardcore or extreme or deeply kinky scenes or photos. It is more about the beauty and showing off of the Hairy parts.
As my pros told, there has been a price reduction that sees the site only costing $14.95 a month. I was used to paying $35 a month for it. The videos may not be as exciting or hardcore as you’re used to, but those videos do a stellar job of showcasing the hairy models. The picture sets are arguably better than the videos. If you’re a Hairy fetishist, you understand that and appreciate it. To make their picture sets even better, you can download a custom zip file you choose the pictures for.
The videos do not have a 4K option, but those are still very clear. The pictures are large quality resolution. I can see not recommending this site despite my high score. This is not for everyone, but I think everyone who tries it will be very impressed and happy with their content.
The model index is the best I have used and the site itself runs and loads quickly and smoothly. There are tags and you should never have trouble finding what you’re looking for.
If I was going to recommend any changes it would be to have more lesbian scenes, but not hardcore (man and woman) scenes. This is a genre that is softcore by nature and it needs to stay that way.
The site is as near to perfect as I have been on. It reminds me that technical quality does not outweigh the biasedness towards a favorite fetish. You also know what you’re getting with the site. That does have the downside of possibly being repetitive, but if you love the fetish, repetitiveness is welcomed.
It's well worth joining for fetishists and maybe non-fetishists could take a look at some of the preview content. There’s almost nothing wrong with this site and I could see it being appreciated by nearly all porn fans.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
An opportunity to explore a rarity in porn, naturally hairy women.
An exceptionally large library of high quality videos and photosets.
Supports download managers.
Several updates per day.
The site is well laid out and easy to use.
Cons:
4K videos are not an option, but there are multiple download options.
Uses tags, but there are not enough of them.
The site says about 90 per cent are amateurs. This can also be a plus for some members.
Some of the women have too much body hair. Also, some of the models are not attractive in my opinion.
There is no discount. This is a premium niche site with a premium price tag.
Not part of a network. It is part of the Gamma family of sites, but a membership does not give you access to any other site.
Bottom Line:
Although there are some sex scenes, both lesbian and boy/girl, We Are Hairy is primarily devoted to solo masturbation by women who are not professional porn stars. Some scenes are interviews and others feature stripping and putting on a sexy show. This is a contrast with most photography sites that have videos. On those, the videos are generally very artistic rather than erotic in their basic nature. We Are Hairy also has excellent photo sets, but the major theme here is women enjoying being seen as hot exhibitionists. You can see the women getting into the action and in many scenes the women visibly get moist. These are mostly non professionals who see this as a chance to fulfill the fantasy of being seen as sexy. I like the interviews as well as the solo shows as the models are as much into it as any viewer.
Another theme that takes center stage here is masturbation. Sometimes the models use fingers, toys, and at other times they use household objects, such as vegetables or brushes. The orgasms seem to be quite genuine. Between squirting and the looks on their faces, I enjoyed what I saw. The models are rather diverse as there are women here of many different ages and body types. Most of the models are Russian. The older models seem to get the most pleasure from doing the scenes. In some scenes the models get into giving the viewer jerkoff instruction, JOI, but that is not universal or even as much as I would prefer.
Some models probably don’t speak English and that detracts from the chance to get to know them better. I did feel that the more ordinary looking, the chubby and especially the older models tried a lot harder in their scenes. I had the impression that they appreciated the opportunity to be seen as sex objects. There is not much here that you would find on a site that uses an approach of making the models look glamorous. I saw little use of makeup, the women have imperfections and in general appear to be women who you would not expect to be on any porn site.
The choice of ordinary homes as the set is remarkable. Combined with the fact that most of the women wear ordinary clothing makes them seem all the more accessible and relatable as well. The layout is very easy to use even if this is your first time on a pornsite. You can easily find the new videos and photo sets that are added on a daily basis.
You can search for other scenes by the same model, or even by the same director. There are tags that enable you to find blondes, brunettes or those with red hair or dyed other colors. You can search by breast size, by video resolution, by the type of clothing or by the size of the photos or the degree that they are hairy. I must mention though that I would prefer a way to find the videos that were sexy shows as they were in the minority. You can find masturbation videos quite easily, but there should be a tag for non masturbation ones.
You have the ability to rate and leave comments on the models, can vote yes or no to adding new ones and can preview new updates as they post a schedule. There are three quality options for the latest videos. There is lacking a 4K option as the best is 1920x1080p, Full High Definition. You have the option to create a custom zip file for just the photos you select. I liked the progression from clothed to nude to explicit. There are about 8100 HD videos and photo sets. The site adds two videos and two photosets per day. Downloads were fast and easy. The files are small as the videos are generally under fifteen minutes. I found no download limits.
An obvious negative is that the site may not have broad appeal. Many porn fans prefer models that are shaved or at least trimmed. On We Are Hairy, many of the models are not just hairy down there, but have body hair as well. In some cases, more hair does not equal more attractive. If you enjoy seeing unglamorous women showing their exhibitionist side, this site has a lot to offer. This is a very large premium site in an uncommon niche and commands a premium price.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- An opportunity to explore a rarity in porn, naturally hairy women.
- Very large site
- Great production values
- Many amateurs (which can be a negative too)
- Broad range of models – age, ethnicity, body type
- Solos/ girl/girl and boy/girl scenes
- Rare niche
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds
- Many download options
- Two video and two photo set updates per day
- The site is well laid out and easy to use
- Great for photo collectors too
Cons:
- No 4K option, for those who prefer that
- Very few known pornstars, mostly amateurs (this is subjective)
- Yes this is strange for me to say, but some of the women have too much body hair
- No TBP/PU discount
- Expensive
- Stand-alone site – no bonus sites
Bottom Line:
Full disclosure – this membership was a real stretch for me. I prefer models who have an intimate relationship with their razor but recently I’ve been pushing my own boundaries.
Obviously, based on the name of the site alone, it’s primary niche is unshaved women. I think a better description is that the women here are natural. The level of hairiness ranges from a thin layer to a curly mound that spreads down the thighs. Also, the hairiness doesn’t have to stop with the pubic area – we’re treated to other ‘natural’ areas on the female body too. You’ll find some hairy ‘pits and legs here too.
The site primarily offers solo scenes, some with masturbation and some with just posing. It isn’t hard to find lesbian and boy/girl sex scenes either.
I think it’s fair to say that the site can also be seen as an amateur site. A vast majority of the models are amateurs though I will confess that I have limited experience in this niche so some of them may appear on other sites too. But, it’s fair to say that you’re not apt to see your favourite A-list models here.
The scenes themselves aren’t scripted and usually follow a flow from clothed to nude. Some of the scenes end at teasing and posing while other go on to masturbation with fingers, toys and household objects. I like that most of the models aren’t heavily made up and wearing ‘porn clothes.’ Most start in clothes that you’d expect any woman to have. The ‘sets’ are usually just in someone’s home.
One other thing that the site does well is that the orgasms seem genuine. I’m not naïve; I think that in most hardcore scenes the woman’s orgasm is faked. Here, I don’t think they are.
One thing that I noted and really liked is that regardless of age or body type, the models here were genuinely into their scenes. It appears that these are ‘regular’ women who are really turned on by offering themselves to be seen as a sex object. That alone held a lot of allure for me. All women are sexy!
The site also offers something akin to BTS scenes as on other sites. Here, they are conducted as interviews. I’m a fan of BTS stuff and I liked the interviews here too. I liked hearing these women talk about themselves. For me, it made the scenes more intimate.
Speaking of the models here, and this is likely the case on most amateur sites, there is a much broader range of model than you’d find on a more mainstream site. Here you’ll find a range of ages, ethnicities and body types. I say this in other reviews but it really is applicable here: there is something here for everyone – with the proviso, of course, that this is a site that features women with natural body hair.
The site is large – huge even. There are currently around 7600 videos available and two more are added each day. It’s hard to argue against the value of the site with numbers like this.
The scenes are downloadable in three resolutions, 1080p, 480p and 360p. Bitrates on the 1080p are 6000 kb/s and are 30 fps. My preference would be to bridge the gap with 720p but that’s subjective. Also, most of the scenes are around 15 minutes long so the file sizes aren’t really an issue anyway. Some may wish for a 4K option, but I think that given that these are mostly amateur models it’s probably too much to hope that they or the director would have a 4K camera available.
The site is a rarity in that it offers as much value for photo collectors as it does for those who collect videos. There are currently 9100 photo sets with two more being added daily. The photo sets are downloadable as zips and the site even offers a feature that allows the user to customize the photo set. I’m not a photo guy so I confess that I didn’t use this feature and can’t really comment on how well it works. Three resolutions are available: 1024, 1600 and 3000 pixels.
The site itself is logical and easy to use. It relies on tags to assist in sorting the scenes, which is essential in a site this size. Some of the tags are unique to this niche – you can even choose to sort by the level of ‘hairiness.’ Given the range of scenes here, I think the site would do a service by added the ability to sort for stripping versus masturbation and others like that.
I found download speeds to be the same as I’d find on other mainstream sites. I had no issues with downloads and didn’t encounter any limits.
The cost of the membership is relatively high and there is no TBP/PU discount offered. But, given the size of the site and it being a rare niche I think it still offers good value for the money.
The bottom line is that while this isn’t my kind of porn, it’s well done for people who are into this niche. The site is easy to use and offers a lot for the money. If you like this niche you really should check out We Are Hairy. I don’t have much experience in this niche but it’s hard to think that there could be any better out there.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The latest videos are at best 1920x1080, 6000 kbps, very sharp, but not 4K.
-Recently updates are 4 or 5 a day.
-808 models, 6912 videos, 7492 photosets. Each has over 100 photos in each.
-Excellent preview tour. You can check everything out, but can’t download.
-For the most part the models are very natural. Few tattoos, implants, piercings or even makeup.
-Nice variety of ethnicities, ages and body types..
-Easy navigation using a logical site layout.
-No advertising on the members pages.
-No download limits.
-Excellent search engine using a tag system.
-Active forum as well as the ability to leave comments on individual videos.
-Free live cam shows. Also available as downloads.
Cons:
-Alphabet soup site generated user name and password’
-Proprietary biller. Not a big name. However, cancellation was simple by using a link under customer support.
-Standalone site with no extras of any kind.
-A bit pricey at $35 a month.
Bottom Line:
I remember a few years back, this site was new and well received by many at PU. I wrote a complimentary review, but had as a con that the new site was still very small. It has grown a great deal since then with 808 models, 6912 videos, and 7492 photo sets. The webmaster was quite active on PU and I remember Basil quite well. If you read this, your helpfulness was and would be very much appreciated here. Please come back. You have a wonderful site.
I recognized a few porn stars such as Chloe Camilla, Lola Gatsby, Laurie Vargas, Max Mikita, Nina Devon, Selma Sins and Sasha Yung. However the the site says that the models are 90% amateurs. Most models are in their twenties, but many are in their thirties and even a few in their forties. Body shapes vary. Many are very thin, but there are some that are a little more full figured. Some have imperfections and they are shown exactly how they are. There is no attempt to glam them or use photo shop. There is little to no makeup and they appear to mostly be natural girl next door types. Few have tattoos, piercing, implants or even bleached fake blond hair. They are very real women that you might someday meet, unlike the too perfect clones that can become a turnoff in a glam model site. Many are beautiful by anyone's standards and some are more appealing in a different way. Many can only be called an acquired taste. Some of the most ordinary looking put on the most sexy performances.
For the most part the Eastern European models don’t say anything and as a result you don’t get to know them. The US and UK models personalities are more accessible. Some are quite excellent at making the art of the verbal being as hot as the visual. What they have to say as they strip or masturbate can be quite erotic.
The best videos strike a good balance between full body eroticism and close ups. Too much of either can kill an otherwise great scene. Most start off in either ordinary, but attractive street clothes, or in a few cases in costumes. One features a harem girl, another in a police woman uniform. The strip scenes have their own tag “striptease” and many are quite hot. Most scenes feature masturbation, mostly with fingers or dildos. The scenes that I liked the best were of the models putting on a show, however. With a site as huge as this one, there were many, even if they were not as plentiful as the masturbation videos. A small number of scenes had either lesbian or heterosexual sex.
Photo sets are mostly indoors, which I prefer over outdoors. The lighting just works out better indoors. Each set has over 100 photos and is zip downloadable. You can even customize which photos to download. Most are not photos from the videos, they are instead unique shoots. Most of the photos are portraits, not landscapes as portraits showcase the models bodies better. By the way, you get mostly landscapes when photos are taken from videos. Most sites take the easy way out and the photos are not as hot as a portrait taken by a high quality camera would have been. The details are 2000x3000 pixels and 72 dpi. This is excellent, but perhaps not as detailed and sharp as in some other photo sites.
Some of the photographers have done work for other sites, so their style here looks familiar. I am a big fan of both Toby and R Williams, whose updates show a true sense of how to get the models to be erotic performers. Even the sexiest models need direction to do their best.
The only reason to deduct any points is that it could be a bit cheaper. This site is crying out for a PU discount. Be that
as it may but it is very true that you get what you pay for. With multiple updates every day for the last several years, this site is well worth the premium price. If you like hairy women, this is the best site in its niche.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+over 7000 picture sets and 5000 movies and counting
+daily updates (usually two picture sets and two movies)
+frequent live shows
+mix of hairy women (all have hairy pussies, some have underarm or leg hair)
+some ethnic models
+good mix of photographers
+user options allows you to see only the content you want (38 categories)
+nice search feature (search by category, keyword, date, format, or photographer)
+no dead links or missing content
+active subscriber base
+bonus photo sets from other sites (AllOver30 and GirlsOutWest usually)
+vote on prospective models
+previews of the next week's upcoming sets
+forum and active users feedback
+customized photo sets
Cons:
-mostly young Eastern European models
-expensive at $35/mo or $80/3 mos
-repetitive sets and costumes
-no 4K content
-only MP4/mobile video download formats
Bottom Line:
Their banner reads "WeAreHairy.com – Natural Hairy Pussy the way you like it!" and they provide a great selection, good photography, and some stunning girls--just the way I like it. Of course, this is a hairy site, so ymmv, but if you like hairy models, this is one of the best sites out there.
WeAreHairy updates with at least two picture sets and two movie sets every day. The content is usually a girl undressing, showing her body, and masturbating. There is occasional hardcore, mostly some B/G action, some rare G/G action, but most of the content is solo models showing her hairy goods in all their glory.
The models themselves vary in hairy splendor. Some have just hairy pussies, some have hairy underarms or hairy legs. The content is clearly tagged into 38 categories (blondes, hairy arms, meaty pussy, puffy nipples, etc.). You can select on the user page what content you want shown, so if live shows or hairy pits or hairy legs aren't your style you can avoid seeing that content.
There is a good mix of photographers at WeAreHairy, many who do sets for other sites (including a few former ATKHairy photographers). Most of the models are slim Eastern European girls
but there are some American girls. Most are younger, but there are some MILFs, and a few chubby girls too. Some ethnic girls, but not a lot considering the size of the site.
CONCLUSION WeAreHairy has overtaken and surpassed ATK Hairy as the best site for lots of hairy women porn. With thousands of sets, easy navigation, and suggested models on every page, you will easily find hairy models to suit you. OF course, if you like shaven pussies, skip this site. Otherwise, well worth the price to check out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Frequent updates
Good diversity in models and photographers
Exemplary site layout/features
Live cam shows
Cons:
Perhaps too hair-oriented
Mostly amateur themed
Pics often less interesting than videos
Photo sets need tighter editing
Bottom Line:
This is a tricky one for me to review, as I'm not necessarily the target market; nevertheless, I'll do my best.
Firstly, compare and contrast: I am very fond of any content featuring panties and nylons - especially tights - the longer they are teased/toyed with the better. I will gladly concede that things I could do with/to them, either on or off their owner, puts this in fetish territory.
OTOH, I also like pubic hair on a model. I think it makes the girls look womanly, sexually mature, and inviting; it is a thrill to catch a glimpse of it, or even to know I will do as the underwear (cf above) comes off; and although I've got used to shaved models, it is still a bit of a disappointment when there's only skin revealed. Pubic hair is natural and sexy thing, and I don't quite see why it's regarded as a fetish; and I do not further fetishise it by way of insisting there is LOTS of it (everywhere), playing with it, or drawing more attention to it than it creates itself. I just prefer it to be there.
Anyway, the above disappointment sent me in search of a suitably themed site; but it appears that there aren't sites for folk like me who just like hair - only for those who worship it... but beggars, choosers etc. The two obvious sites, therefore, are We Are Hairy and ATK Hairy. I looked at both of them and they seem very similar in style, content and even in model roster - WAH seemed a bit more glam, a bit better organised and with a more manageable amount of content to get through within a month's membership.
The mechanics of the site are exemplary; one of the best I've ever joined. There are the usual features:
* Dated updates
* Separate video and pic lists
* Model index
* Browse by category or tag
* Advanced search
As well as novel features like:
* Your own favourites (although oddly you can't favourite a model, only specific sets?)
* Browse by photographer (I tend to follow photograhers more than models)
* Custom zip downloads
* Webcam shows (I never got round to viewing any, but there seem to be a couple a week)
* Forum and comments on sets (albeit with the usual complement of spurious/disrespectful ones)
* Personal settings (how you view pictures, and what tags/categories to exclude if eg you don't like hairy legs etc)
And although not as vast as ATK, there's a good deal of content; generally 4-5 updates per day (3 photo sets and 2 videos), and with about 4 years worth of updates I make approx:
* 400+ models
* 3000+ photo sets, 3K, 100-150 pics each
* 2000+ videos, most 720p, 10-15 mins
Models are reasonably diverse in age - 18-40 and some beyond - and there there is probably just a little more ethnic diversity than on an average site. They can be broadly split - with plenty of exceptions - into 3 groups:
* East European (mostly Russian) account for maybe two-thirds of the updates - most girls are young, with pubic hair and otherwise neatly shaved. Some pretty girls but many do not let their personality or sensuality show; it would be nice to hear them talk more, even if their English was not good, or even in Russian etc.
* UK models - as above, most have pubic hair only - but get more chance to show their personality, with interviews, various dirty talking in masturbation and stripping videos, etc. These were the ones that worked best for me.
* US girls - tend to be more of the hippy type, with many more having hairy armpits, legs, etc. Again, they get interviews and some fun videos; some of the girls are very alluring but the extra hair isn't necessarily for me.
Photo sets are a bit too big for my liking; I prefer them more tightly edited, large sets get a bit repetitive. The style is relatively amateur (and I do mean the style, rather than the quality - which is generally good) - without much in the way of mood or evocative lighting - but still some fun sets.
Likewise for the videos - they are generally plenty explicit enough, most featuring masturbation with/without toys (also some GG and GB videos but much fewer). Many are a bit too samey, but some have a bit more of a theme - eg the very lovely Fawna Latrisch getting predictably wet and soapy when washing a floor; or a couple of models stripping out of some sexy officewear.
So, overall, although a great site, it doesn't quite work for me. It's only this that dictates my slightly lower score; if I was more of a hair and amateur lover this would easily be in the 90s.
I wish there was a site like eg The Life Erotic, or Joymii, that featured more unshaven girls; until that happens, I guess I'll stick to picking and choosing the limited amount of unshaven content such sites have.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Some hairy models are forthcoming and natural. Many are attractive or beautiful. There is no download limit. Videos are mostly solos, which is fine, and there a fair amount of time is devoted to closeups, which I like.
Cons:
Files have a different name than they appear in at the site. Thus the site might refer throughout to This Model playing with hairy pussy on bed but delivers ThisModel_HiddenPinkPanties. This, combined with a URL system that disarms cookies, makes it all but impossible to keep track of which files youve downloaded and which you havent.
Videos plagued by artificial masturbation with lots of sighs and moans: really irritating. Also the site often instructs women to masturbate by snaking their hands around their thighs from behind, a move as artificial and labored as it sounds.
Despite assurances to the contrary, downloads break under any Macintosh download manager Ive tried.
Too few women of color (or age).
Minor- files are named according to some object in the room, not by date, so theres no sequence to the files, as is the case at a major competitor.
Bottom Line:
Not a naturalistic site, which I prefer, especially for hairy models. If you don't mind very artificial masturbation videos with -lots- of ooooh's and aaaah's for no reason, you'd do fine here.
Hint to somewhat improve your ability to see your download history- delete the nonsense string ahead of "members" in the url and reload before downloading.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Clean layout of site.
Has a good proportion of higher resolution pics.
Cons:
Hit and miss on the video quality.
No standard in terms of poses. You will not get similar poses from set to set. The thing about that is you will not get the poses that you want.
Focusing issues throughout.
There is rarely any ethnicity on the site.
Not enough models.
Not enough attractive models.
Bottom Line:
Overall I was very disappointed with the site mainly due to the quality of the photos.
In my opinion most of the woman on the site are not too attractive. 50 - 75% of the woman is a 5 out of 10. 5 being average. If you like stunning women from time to time - look else where.
If you like a standard among poses from set to set , you will be very frustrated here. You'll be lucky to get a nice boob shot or butt shot on every set let alone the common poses. The poses are very random, because of this, you will never know what you're going to get on the daily updates - I know that some people likes this however. I was disappointed more times than not.
This is a hairy site, therefore, I thought they would be superb when it comes to seeing a clear detailed shot of the vagina. They were just good enough on the closeups. On most of the shots when zoomed out to more of a full body shot - the quality went down the toilet - and the vagina were of pretty bad detail. This was frustrating because the photos were very large, yet they were lacking in detail.
There were terrible lighting issues throughout. Some of the photo shoots were so bright that the details were burned out and blinding. Some of this may be due to photo editing. On many occasions the photo editing ruined detail, such as not being able to see detail of the woman's hair.
There were too many occasions of the hairy extreme, which included hairy legs, hairy asses, and arm pits.
If you like female masturbation videos - stay away from this site. Theses are among the most boring women masturbating that I have ever seen; the females will not utter a word; they rarely make moaning sounds; you could hear a pen drop they're so quiet; the females rarely looks into the camera nor interact; seams like they pull on or play with their pubic hair more than masturbating; the masturbation seems very fake on most videos;
The worse part of the videos is the extreme closeup shots. They stay zoomed for half to 3/4 of the videos in many cases.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ A good range of hirsute content to suit most tastes in this niche,.
+ Wholesome, pretty, amateur models.
+ Large Database of Photosets and videos.
+ Clean and efficient site design and layout.
+ Customizable user settings and search features provide a nice user experience
+ Custom zip files for downloads
+ Multiple Daily Video/Photo updates
+ Free Cam Shows
+ Good customer service
Cons:
- Older photo content can have issues with soft-focus and stray focus.
- Lack of any substantial ethnic diversity in models.
- Web cam show scheduling conflicts with most schedules in north America.
Bottom Line:
I found myself really hard-pressed to come up with any specific negatives beyond those listed above. This is one of the best sites--if not the best--I have come across in terms of the user experience and range of content available to a subscriber. There are extensive photo sets, videos, free interactive web shows, all for a single subscription price. The user experience I can only classify as top-notch, at least relative to the sites I have subscribed to in the past. There are utilities for just about any feature at the site. There are customizable search tools, gallery tools, favorite lists, and custom zip downloads where you are free to choose to select(or deselect) which images go into a zip. There is also a user forum and web masters are very quick to respond to any questions.
The content here is traditional solo softcore posing with some dildo and masturbation action. There is the occasional girl-girl scene as well. If your preference is softcore erotica, the content will meet your demands. If you demand hardcore action, this is not the place to find it and you will be disappointed.
If you are looking for the traditional airbrushed porn star look, this site will likewise not meet your needs. Makeup is used in moderation--it is of the kind you will see on any girl on the street-- and there is no attempt tot hide any blemish or mole with post-processing. The models are pretty and wholesome amateurs but they are not over-glamorized. That is not the look that this site aims for and it would detract from the natural theme. Most of the models appear to be in their mid-twenties, with a few MILF and a few of the just-turned-legal variety.
There is an abundance pf photo and video content and updates happen daily. Galleries are nicely done with semi-pro level photography. Super-high resolution images bring out every subtle detail and nuance on the models. Some of the older sets, however, do suffer at times from stray focus or a soft focus. This issue does not appear in most of the photosets posted after 2010, however. The videos are of high quality and they are clips of roughly 10 minutes in length. The main attraction here, however, is the photography. I found the DL speeds to be more than adequate.
Beyond the occasional image quality issue of older sets, the only other negative that stands out is the lack of diversity in the ethnicity of the models. Most are from Eastern Europe, the UK, or California. It would be nice to see the site expand this range a bit and offer more Latin and ethnic models in the galleries.
There are interactive web cam shows that happen a few times a week. These last an hour Unfortunately, the scheduled times appear to be centered around European time zones. Outside of the 4 PM Saturday show, if you are in North America, you will likely find it hard to attend during the week, out of personal work schedules. Never having attended a cam show in the past, I wasn't sure what to expect as I have no experience with cam media. I did sit in on the Saturday show with the model Raven. One can type questions or comments--or requests--and the model seemed willing to oblige(within reason). The feed quality was decent. The flow could be easily interrupted, however, when users ask questions(or act like toolbags)' Once you find the ignore user option, however, it is less distracting. If you are into cam shows, this is certainly a nice bonus, especially given that it is free of charge and from what I can tell, most fees for cam shows can be ridiculously expensive. Being able to interact with the models adds a personal touch to the site experience.
I chose to join this site as I prefer natural femininity over the glossed-over and heavily-toned airbrushed look of the majority of porn available today. What many people interested in this niche probably want to hear most about is the actual hirsute content available. Based on comments I have read here and elsewhere, it seems that what people find attractive in this niche is all over the board, which one would epect, given the broad scope and relative meaning that the word 'hairy' invokes. There is probably not a niche that has more diversity of tastes and opinions. When reading the review comments for various sites in this niche, I see complaints about models being too hairy or not hairy enough, or not having hair in the right place. What is hairy enough? What is too hairy? What is the right place? The answers are so relative to an individual that I cannot tell you if the content here meets your criteria. What I can say is that this site appears to cater to the middle of the road and it avoids extremes as a predominant feature. This is the way it should be, IMO, as there are so many tastes. No preference is given to any fetish and the content strikes a good balance. You will find just about anything here for most users in terms of hair. However, its unrealistic to expect to see every model always conform to your ideals.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Friendly, involved and supportive Webmaster.
+Amazing models, amazing quality.
+Excellent growth since my last review. I counted 134 models today who, on the average, posed for seven to eight sets and videos. Not shabby for a site a year old. Growth has accelerated even more since Nov. 11, 2010, when the site decided on three updates a day, seven days a week.
+Now includes downloads for portables.
+All videos, except for a very few are of HD quality at 1280x720 at 5000 kbps. Videos are available in various formats, HD MP4, HD WMV, DVD MP4, DVD WMV plus iPOD/iPHONE MP4.
+Picture sets are available zipped in Standard Resolution (1024), High Resolution (1600) and Super High Resolution (3000+). Custom zip available.
+Excellent HD streaming of videos.
+Excellent search. Search by category or hone in on something that meets your taste exactly, it's all there.
+Allows you to filter out themes you don't care for, has a voting system, allows for comments good and bad, has a forum. Continued:
Cons:
Super High Speed for me (anywhere from 2.5 MB/s to 3 MB/s.
*********************************************
Can't find one darn thing wrong with the site, except that | would like to see every model come wrapped in erotic lingerie but seeing that someone else expressed their distaste of all those lingerie sets in a comment .. we must give Kudos to the Webmaster for looking after his strange taste as well! :-) Just kidding, friend!
Bottom Line:
I love this site. So far as I am concerned they started with the intention of making theirs the best hairy site possible and have added enough bells and whistles in the year they have been in existence that they achieved top dog position in this short time.
I would have given a hundred but I'm still smarting from that one non-confidence vote I got last time I gushed over a site. :-)
Highly recommended to all hairy fans. You are getting the best in the niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Pictures: Standard Res 1024 pixels, High Res 1600 pixels, Super Hi-Res 3000+ pixels
+ Videos: HD 1280x720 mp4 & wmv 5100 bitrate, DVD quality 768 x 432 mp4 & wmv 2100 bitrate, iPod 640x340 mp4 700 bitrate
+ Numerous tags (meaty lips, masturbation, striptease, etc.)
+ Advanced search by keywords, categories, resolution, movies/pics, photographer and date
+ Tabs: News, Coming Soon, Favorites, Models, Categories, Photos, Movies, Search, Forum, Support & Logout
+ Download manager gave me 2+ MB speed
+ File names include model name
+ Excellent Help & Support section
+ 72 models (not bad for a new site)
+ Members can leave comments about videos & pic sets
+ Custom zips for pictures
Cons:
- Can't set picture viewing preference (size) globally - have to click forward and backwards for each picture
- Higher resolution pictures are slow to load
- Not much variety in models - no ethnics, age and body type (new site issue?)
- A "We Are Hairy" splashscreen at the beginning of each video (A personal annoyance)
Bottom Line:
This is a departure for me - a fairly short bottom line. For a site that's only been up since September 2009, this one's doing very well. The site is so easy to get around, it only took me four hours check it all out and come up with this review. There are 69 movies and 317 picture sets up at the time of this review. From the attentiveness of the webmaster on here and from what I see on the site, I can only see it getting better. If you like 'em hairy, you should check this one out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Billing through CCBill without regional pricing.
-Hi Def videos
-Super high resolution photo sets
-Custom zips available as an option.
-Helpful and friendly webmaster. Excellent customer service.
-Forum and photoset comments by Capn and Messmer.
Great to see friends from PU.
-Two uploads a day, but mostly photos not videos.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download restrictions.
Cons:
-Needs more attractive girls. They are natural but often leave something to be desired.
-Few models are not very thin. Not much variety in size, body shape, or age.
-The site has American models, but not yet a single one that is any race but white. Surely they can be found and photographed.
-The videos are nearly all masturbation. I prefer teasing,stripping, or just about anything but not hands on or inside their pussy,or toys.
Bottom Line:
After reading reviews by some PUers that I really respect a lot, I decided to join a site dedicated to bush.
My first experience involved billing and entering. I got immediate helpful answers from the webmaster Basil. Nice first impression.
The site layout is simple and uncomplicated. There are enough options to make navigation easy. The search engine works just fine. There are no broken links and no other problems.
The first section I checked out was the videos. While the quality was great, I just don't care much for masturbation either manually or with toys. Not good. I kept nothing, as the content was not to my taste.
However, I had been expecting the photo sets to be the best part of the site, as it usually is with softcore sites.
Many of the models were of close to legal age. I wouldn't mind that, but with zero or almost no makeup, the acne that many have is just a turnoff. I like natural, but a touch of makeup is fine with me. Acne, no way, sorry. There were a few mature models, but so far very few. There were a few with at least C cups, but not many. Most were A's and B's. That can be attractive, but I also would prefer more with larger size breasts.
I hate tattoos and piercings. While only a few had either or both, I was turned off that any did. At least their bodies were otherwise all natural with no boob jobs.
Most, I felt about 75%, of the women on the site were very ordinary in their attractiveness. That can be ok, but the site definitely needs more of the better looking ones.
While the photos were of high resolution and I love the custom capability of the zipdownloads, I feel the site needs a lot more growth.
With two updates a day, I am sure the site will continue to improve. It definitely has potential. However, the site is not yet ready to get a score better than 80 from me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Excellent photography and videography.
Gorgeous models (58 at last count), mostly Eastern European (at least the ones I've come across so far). Might be a minus for some but I find videos and photos coming from the East generally more exciting. As an added benefit this leaves out all those annoying male comments because the models and photographers don't speak English.
HD quality videos at 1280x720 at 5000 kbps.
Videos are available in five formats, HD MP4, HD WMV, DVD MP4, DVD WMV plus iPOD/iPHONE MP4.
Recent picture sets are available zipped in Standard Resolution (1024), High Resolution (1600) and Super High Resolution (3000+).
Custom zips. Excellent search capabilities.
Smooth streaming of videos.
Two updates daily!
Cons:
Some of the American models are still indulging in the aggravating habit of wearing too little lingerie and getting undressed too quickly, leaving one with three pages of nudes. Blame the photographer though.
A little quirk when it comes to downloads. If I want a video in mp4 I have to right-click to bring up the menu. If I download in WMV I have to left-click.
Bottom Line:
In my opinion this new site has made itself the best "hairy" site on the web in one fell swoop. I tell you what it did to me, it re-converted me to a picture fan because most models are gorgeous and the super high resolution pictures are breathtaking. So are the videos, by the way, so I can enjoy both for a change. Most picture places neglect videos and most video places neglect photos. This site does both well.
I would have given this site my highest rating ever if it had had a larger amount of contents, but with two updates a day it shouldn't take long to build.
Maybe in another year, if the webmaster sticks to his present standards I'll give it a 99! :-)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Clean & effective site layout.
Very attentive & friendly staff
Good quality photography. Well edited.
No 3 dozen shots of the same pose here
Sticks to niche well
Regular updates. 2 per day
Biased towards photosets.
Zips available in at least 2 resolutions & user defined custom zips are available
( 15 of the last 18 updates photosets )
Good value
Cons:
Still a young website. 58 models so far.
A few minor glitches with the website, which are in the process of being sorted out.
Bottom Line:
This site is catering to an undersupported niche well.
There is full nudity, both coy & explicit &
at times, for a refreshing change there is actually some shots of hose & shoes being removed.
Sets usually start fully clothed, & they seem amenable to making a feature of full strip sets.
The photography is very well done, without much if anything in the way of post work.
It is solo softcore although toys are present at times.
If you are looking for hardcore, this isn't it.
It wouldn't be fair for me to pass comment on the video as it is
not a thing that appeals to me, but at a cursory glance, it seems to be decent enough quality.
It is obvious this is a website presented by people who care.
If softcore solo photosets of natural pretty ladies appeals, this
site should hit the spot for you.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
