Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Smallish network of heavily niche content (fauxcest, JOI and POV)
Hot females of varying ages
New updates, but TBP review mentions some recycling
More than half of the videos have 4K downloads
No download limits
The photos are a nice touch and can be downloaded
Everything works as it should despite members area being cluttered with ads and upsells
Cons:
It seems to be more common than not, but ads within the members area are still a bit much to me
The niches may be nearing their expired or overused date
Some recycling reported by TBP, but for me, a new member, I don’t notice
Bottom Line:
I like POV porn and I especially like JOI porn. Fauxcest is okay, but it’s becoming a little overused. I know this because I don’t even pay attention to that aspect of the setup or premise. That’s a sign of overuse desensitizing my senses to the niche. But if you do like that niche, this network is almost solely based on the premise.
The site that interested me the most was Daughter JOI and it’s a great find. It may even present a high creepy factor with the pushing of the innocent daughter image, but it’s porn and feeling creepy about it comes with age. It doesn’t mean it’s not arousing, quite the contrary even. The other included sites don’t veer too far off that same beaten path with Mommy JOI and Sister JOI joining in the JOI fun, JOI is Jerk Off Instruction for those that don’t know. The network includes Bad Daddy POV, Bad Mommy POV and Bad Sister POV. It makes this network relatively easy to know what to expect and what you’re getting with each site. It also would become repetitive if you stayed for much longer than a month at a time.
I noted the TBP review mentioned recycling on some of the new updates, but it does say not all updates are recycled and as a first time member, all are new to me.
I do wish the scenes were a little less serious about the fauxcest and maybe a little more humorous, ala Team Skeet’s fauxcest sites. It’s not that the fauxcest is distracting or even annoying, it’s more like it hinders the natural sexual actions. I’m thinking having to act like sister, brother, mommy, daddy, maybe is more than some of the actors and actresses can pull off. I just don’t think an overused premise is worth sacrificing the quality of the sexual action.
To my surprise, I all but forgot the POV aspect. I am thinking I have just watched enough POV porn, I see it is a common camera angle. But, with that said, this network does a really good job of getting up-close and personal with the POV scenes.
Which also presents the most important part of this network for me. The JOI content. It’s some of the best I have seen, but I will say there’s not a whole lot of JOI out there. You’ll find more amateur JOI on user-uploaded sites than on traditional porn sites and that’s okay, these JOI sites are more than acceptable and come with extremely high quality downloads. I do not know of any download limits.
The more common problem with this network is the amount of ads and upsells. It seems that would be something we would become more used to, but it still does annoy me seeing them in a paid members area.
I know that the looks of models is a subjective opinion for each of us, but I find these models very hot for this style of porn. POV, especially, leans on curvier and bustier models, while JOI is usually better with the slimmer, more believably innocent models. The Bad Family POV network does those well.
Use of the network is simple and that’s most-likely because it’s not a large network. It is big enough for what it costs, though. I just don’t know if the network has enough variety for any kind of a long-term subscription. As a monthly join it’s a very good site that does a lot more right than wrong.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. Large catalog (This is very missleading, see cons)
2. Easy navigation
3. Uncluttered members area
Cons:
1. Majority of content is HEAVILY edited
2. Model index is missing a few entries
3. Extremely pricy for dated and edited content
4. randomly generated file names
5. Mostly a archive network with only 3 sites still updating
Bottom Line:
I initially joined Slut inspection. Having gone through that, I found that the models had scenes listed from other sites that I wanted so I upgraded my membership to "thirsty plus". There still were A lot of scenes so I just joined the full porn network. I was just infuriated after logging in after joining and findind that at least 2/3 if not 3/4 of this network is drastically cut down verisions of these scenes that YOU HAVE TO PAY EXTRA TO SEE. Basically just 10 minute promos. They have the run times on the scene window and every scene in passionhd for example has a run time of exactly 10 minutes. The fact that they expect you to pay extra for these butchered scenes is flat out insane, the height of greed. Why the hell would we pay for what is by all means a commercial!? So If you join this site be sure to check the run times on the videos your interested in before buying access to that channel or better yet just go find a discount and join the site your interested in and just get the full unedited versions. Just as an example I'll google "Passionhd.com discount" and 9 times out of 10 I find an at least 50% off offer no matter what time of year.
Another annoyance is the model index. Some are not listed at all but found in the site itself, an example is Pornforce scene Coconey. She doesn't even come up in a direct search which just doesn't make sense. You go to the pornforce site and there she is and she has a profile so why doesn't she at least come up on a direct search?!
Another big annoyance is randomly generated file names. Scenes have name as "c9sjyt1g6a" So you either have to keep sharp tabs as your downloading or rename as you go along. If you Mistakenly download the same file twice it will have a different name every time it's downloaded so pay attention to this.
Bad daddy (And sister sites) slut inspection, and analized are the only sites still updating. I don't mind archive sites if I've never been a member.
My opinion, just join an Individual site and skip the network option. This network option is just flat out not worth it.
Glad I found a special join price because There's no way I'd pay $60 a month for this edited crap. Why they have such a high membership fee for what is just your average vanilla porn is beyond me. Absolutely nothing special to be honest.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Multi-site teen network of 6 sites.
Current deal gives access to the 6 sites of the Slut Inspection network and the classic site Teen Dreams.
Multiple updates per week.
High quality downloads of videos and pictures.
Nice 4K videos
Network is dedicated to following a husband and wife seducing teens to swing with them. Similar to the Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity sites.
Cons:
Pictures should be more of a focus and better quality.
Way too many ads!
Site is clunky, maybe because of all the ads?
Bottom Line:
I was wanting to join Teen Dreams, it’s one of my all-time favorite porn sites, but when I went to register, there was an offer for Teen Dreams and the Slut Inspection network for one price.
The biggest pro is how nice the videos look on a 4K monitor. The content is reminiscent of Teen Fidelity/Porn FIdelity. A married porn couple goes out looking for teens to swing with. One surprise is, the wife is the camerawoman. It’s not a new idea and it’s in a small field dominated by the Kelly Madison network. It is hard to watch these scenes without thinking about the Teen Fidelity scenes. Or even comparing it to Teen Fidelity.
The network, if it really is a network, blends 5 sites that are closely related. The sites – Slut Inspection, Teenage Tryouts, Wife’s POV, Sluts POV and Slutty BBW are all similar to one another.This is a sticking point in this review. The network as a whole has less than 200 scenes. I’m not real familiar with the Full Porn Network, but it does look like they either run this network or own it and are known for stretching the word “network”. Other than that, it’s not a bad site.
None of the sites stand out from the others. It feels like I’m watching the same porn with one or two differences, usually based on the models’ physical appearance or angle of the camera. I was also surprised there isn’t more of a focus on photos. It seems like pictures would add to the realism of the niche. Maybe have the teen models send nudes to the married couple? Just something to give it a less contrived feel.
At least the quality is good and the site is easy to navigate. I’m admittedly, not attracted to BBW models, the Slutty BBWs site is of no interest to me. The rest of the “sites” are above average, but be warned, if you’re used to the Fidelity sites by Kelly Madison, it could hurt these sites for you.
The addition of receiving Teen Dreams saved this network for me. I can honestly say I wouldn’t join this network if not for it being included in a promo special of Teen Dreams.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Small but high quality network covering a few different niches.
- Cones with five different sites/niches.
- Fast downloads at 90% my max download speed
- Videos can be downloaded in 720p, 1080p and 4K
- Multiple updates per week across the network
- Pretty models in every scene.
Cons:
- Owned and operated by the same guys at Full Porn Network. I will explain the con in the bottom line.
- The overall size of the network is not very good but they do offer a decent update schedule.
Bottom Line:
The guys at Full Porn Network are set on creating as many small networks as possible. While this is an overall positive review, it also shows some frustration. I can explain that and the first con like this: There are 5 sites included. Those are Teenage Tryouts, Wife’s POV, Sluts POV, Slutty BBWs and Slut Inspection. All those combined have between 100-200 scenes total. If you like one of the sites better than the others it may only have 20-25 scenes on it. It’s the perfect example of spread too thin. They have taken a collection of exclusive porn scenes, stuck a recurring theme from scene to scene and called each niche a “site”. It wouldn’t be so bad if these guys didn’t have other networks but they do and most of those have small sites on them.
What you have here is a decent size overall collection of 5 different niches. They do have high quality in everything and I’m sure that makes some people happy with the network. The videos are 4k, 720p and 1080p downloads. It officially becomes a current network with no pictures included. Someone making poor decisions should be the name of the network.
Enough of that, the porn offered here is good for what it is. There is no rhyme or reason with the different sites in the network, no correlation from niche to niche, which could be a positive or negative depending on the person viewing it. We have BBWs, which I won’t even look at and there are Cuckold scenes which I know some people do not like. There are amateur teens and that’s what these guys do best. It just seems like the network wants to spiral out of control with these different niches not complementing each other.
There are no set stories beyond the named theme in the title of each site. You do get pretty models (except BBWs, just not my thing) and hardcore action. The quality helps it all out too. The videos are very crisp and clear but no pictures Is a negative for some.
It’s a network that feels a lot like the other Full Porn Network networks. You can live with out it. If they ever combined all their sites into one big network they would be onto something, probably a mid-90s score even but as it is, they seem to be more focused on barely reaching above mediocrity and letting the number of networks they have make them money on membership fees for every 4-5 sites they have. I won’t lower their score that much since I’m not here to judge their business decisions but also can’t promote their networks as anything more than something worth joining if you get a discount and for one month only.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Mostly features James Deen with some of porn’s best female models
Only 67 scenes, but the models do make up for it and most scenes are long.
No 4K, but all scenes have 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads.
Has kind of a diary type feel to it like James just invited these women over to his place and they decided to have sex.
Repeated models with multiple scenes are some of the ones I really like.
Cons:
It's a dead site, I believe. The dates show, but not the year and the newest is from March. This is February, I am guessing that is an older video. Also, the no 4K while most of the sites on here have 4K.
The site loads slower than the other sites on this network.
Bottom Line:
This is an interesting site that is buried on this network. The name makes it interesting -- homemade. The camera/filming style is along the lines of homemade porn, but by no means is bad. It looks like the pro said. Like it’s some kind of sex diary. Several models have multiple scenes and all scenes look to be in the same house. The titles of the scenes are even intriguing. One scene is James Dean with Abella Danger and it is titled, Abella Danger Passionate Amateur Sex. How long ago would it have to be for James or Abella to be classified as amateur? They are two of the handful of porn stars I recognize easily by name. The scene is very good too.
One thing to make a note of, the watermark on it says DTF Sluts, which is a site the company that owns this network also owns and was one of the sites I was hoping to get with Analized. It’s because I have seen scenes like this from DTF Sluts and the scenes are quite erotic while keeping an edge to them and not falling into that genre, I call softer hardcore. I don’t know if all the scenes from this site are from the company’s other sites, but it is a very good site. The scenes last 30-50 minutes. And it’s mostly all sex. I was thinking maybe there would be interviews since the woman shows up at what I assume is James’ house or condo. There is a more personal feel to the scenes like he knows these women personally and while rough, it never turns into the trying to prove something his testosterone level like many of the other scenes from the sites on this network do.
It reminds me more of a guy is getting lucky with some very pretty and sexy women. He doesn’t want to risk doing anything that will stop them from answering his calls. That personal touch, kind of removes the porn feeling. All of these women are well-known porn models. Chanel Preston has multiple scenes. Ava Addams and Mystica Jade. I don’t think it’s that old of content. You can download in 1080p and one of the newer scenes is a sexy scene with Kira Noir, who is very attractive.
It's all too typical that this would be the one that’s not updating, anymore. I feel like these networks find something good and decide to stop it, maybe come back to it later. From looking at the scenes on James Deen’s site, I don’t get the same feeling as I get from these scenes. This site may be his best work. It’s sexy and I don’t find him attractive at all, but the mood and the quietness of the scenes. The one with Abella is probably worth joining just for it. I haven’t really seen her like this. She is usually pretty dominant and aggressive. She’s more toned down, moaning, passionate like the scene title says. I even think the no pictures with scenes makes it seem that much more like it’s not porn. It’s his personal life. Very good site that is probably better than the rest of the network combined. It shows me my negative feelings towards the other sites on this network are probably validated by this. The other scenes on the other sites are robotic and forced feeling. You get this more natural feel from these scenes, and you can see why the other sites do not give as good of an impression. I have the other network from them. I just joined it a few days ago and won’t review any of it yet.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The site that led me to join this network all because of one scene. Please read my comment in the Bottom Line about Analized. The information is incorrect on The Best Porn and left me with a network of very little of what I expected.
Gabriella Paltrova and Jaclyn Taylor in the scene “Slut Training”. Wasn’t as good as I expected, but it was enough to get me to join the network.
High quality downloads, unless I missed one, all scenes have up to 4K.
Downloadable picture sets and they’re not bad, could use a boost in resolution at on 1920x1280
Some of the scenes are pretty good, especially the ones with more than 2 people.
Cons:
This network is part of a network that is part of a network. Nothing I found before joining told me of the sites I was not going to have access to or told me exactly of which sites I had access to. I don’t know if they changed the way their network(s) work, but The Best Porn listing hasn’t been updated since the change. Please look into that.
It's man porn. What do I mean? It’s more about the guy’s ass and balls than anything else. I don’t hate this type of porn. It just seems like such a waste to have a beautiful model only to focus on how far the man can stretch her ass open.
Bottom Line:
I am going to put the explanation here of the problem with Analized as a network. They also own Porn Force, Full Porn Network and James Deen. Reading The Best Porn review, it lists 14 sites that come with Analized. Those included the sites I was interested in DTF Sluts, Big Daddy POV, Your Mom Does Porn and POV Perverts. I have access to NONE of those. I have access to Anal BBC, Anal Amateurs, this site Anal Violation, Your Mom Does Anal, Teenage Anal Sluts, Her Gape and Homemade Anal Porn. That is 7 of the sites listed on The Best Porn listing. I’m not as upset as it may seem. It’s just I’m not really into anal, at least not this much and I had to join their other network to get sites that I thought came with Analized.
This scene with Gabriella Paltrova and Jaclyn Taylor was what made me interested. Add those sites I thought I was included, and I thought I had found a really good deal. It was $10 on New Years Day. The scenes on this site are a little more creative than the previous site I reviewed from this network. There does seem to be more of a setup and story with the scenes. The woman wants to try anal. Different objects are used to prepare her. The sex is okay. It is just the focus of the camera that becomes annoying. I get that anal sex is probably difficult to record unless maybe POV. But the constant view of a hairy ass and balls flying around just doesn’t help my feeling towards porn like this.
That is why the scenes with more than 2 people are the ones I like. The camera has to pick everyone up or bounce around by couple to couple and doesn’t get stuck in that one view. Maybe I am being too critical when I say anal sex is not the most camera-friendly sex. One scene on here comes to mind, the woman on her back and the guy squeezing her legs together. Good, creative positioning for the couple since squeezing the legs together causes the anus to open more. All I can see as a viewer is the woman’s legs squeezed together, about ¾ of the man’s dick and nothing else. I can’t even see the penetration.
On the positive side, it has 141 scenes, acceptable photo sets and the videos can be downloaded from 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The group scenes are quite good. The scenes are even long. Some even over an hour, especially when more than 2 people. That’s my way of saying they should just do away with the one on one anal scene. If you’re going to be wild and kinky add a few more couples in there. It’s an okay site on an okay network, as long as you know which sites you’re going to receive. There are a lot of ads for their other sites. From the looks of it those sites used to come with Analized, they then split it up and didn’t tell anyone.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of the better sites on Analized
Cute models, some that I even recognize by name.
Not quite as insulting to the human nature side of me as some of these sites. I especially like the scenes with multiple young women with one guy. That makes anal sex in this form more sexual and sensual to me.
130 scenes plus two updates per month.
Excellent video quality up to 4K. I do not think there are download limitations.
Cons:
Just like I like the scenes with 2 females and one guy, can’t say I like the 2 guys with one female scenes very much, but it is fairly balanced.
The frustration with the network as a whole which I described in the Anal Violations review.
Bottom Line:
I get a few emails when I say things about human nature side. As much as I can appreciate the BDSM roles of dominant and submissive, in human nature, those are defined by males being generally larger, more physically stronger and by the hormones of testosterone and estrogen. There has to be a better way to show anal sex than just having the guy overpower the woman, while stomping on her and acting like he couldn’t do that, naturally. I don’t even mind rough sex/porn. Most of the porn on this network makes a mistake with me that makes it hard for me to enjoy it. They’re paying the woman. Dom and sub left the building right there. She’s going to be what you pay her to be. Why then waste the time proving it with attempts of sadism against someone you paid? Call it a cultural difference. Men in India do these things to prove their power, control and superiority over women.
This site is more okay with me. It’s no less hardcore. It just doesn’t seem to be filled with oozing testosterone displays. The models on this site are quite different than most on this network. There is a younger, cuter look to the models. Most of the sites on the network have the MILF style models. The scenes look more like a couple enjoying themselves and often the young female models look like they are in more control than the male is. It makes me wonder if any porn producer of hardcore porn ever thought to try letting the female be in control?
The video quality is very good with 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. There are 130 scenes with two updates per month. The photo sets could be a big plus if the resolution was better. I said it once before, if you have 4K videos, why are the photos only 1080p? The photos even focus on the model or models before the sex starts. Those can be downloaded in zips.
I’m going to give a full closing on the network and site by saying I would recommend it if you like pretty and cute models having anal sex. I believe if the network added the sites back that it used to give with it, it would be a very good network. As it is, I paid $30 total to get the sites I expected with Analized. There are a couple sites not listed that I liked quite a bit, Anal Amateur which has around 40 scenes and Lesbian Anal Sluts which has around 30 scenes. I liked both of those better than the listed sites. It’s an okay network as long as you know what you’re getting with a membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Big name female models considering the niche.
105 scenes currently, 2 updates per month.
Each scene has a photo set you can download and a video.
Curiosity drew me to these sites: I have seen clips that include a bisexual male twist that may go unnoticed.
No 4K, but all scenes have up to 1080p. Is 4K disappearing? Even the newest scenes don’t have it.
Easy to cancel which was important. Didn’t recognize biller, but curiosity was pushing me to join. Cancel was as easy as any site with automated cancel.
Cons:
This specific site really plays to a stereotype of the horny, slutty, MILF that cannot get enough sex. Some of these female models are very pretty 30s – 40s women, they make them look trashy and slutty on this site.
The only thing more of than fake boobs are the ads.
Bottom Line:
I don’t know how many of these sites I will review. The curiosity that was piqued by samples from this site was the obvious straight males, having their dicks rubbed together as the woman gives a double blowjob. I don’t know if I’ve just never paid attention to that. It is something I find arousing. I was able to get a deal around Christmas. There is some dick rubbing going on.
This site is so straightforward there’s not a lot you can say about it. Some of the scenes are threesomes. Those are the best ones. There is no story. Well, I guess there is for the entire site. It’s a older (by porn standards) women that has the fantasy of taking a big, black cock up her butt. There are names I know and as I have told before, I don’t know a lot of models by name. I know these are well-known. There’s Lisa Ann, Simony Diamond, Annisa Kate, these are attractive models.
I’m going to just think about a suggestion. I think this would work better if the guys were younger. Most of the guys look 30s and 40s. That is a problem I have with MILF porn. I see MILF as experienced and seducing younger men. I mean no offense to the guys in the scenes. They seem really happy to be in the scenes. No seduction was needed. The women do make or break these scenes. You can see that all of the women are capable of handling dual penetration. That is the part that saves this site. Lisa Ann and especially Simony Diamond, they are making me feel like they not only enjoy this, they could add a few more guys. I mentioned the part that interested me. That is power games. I do like the scenes where the woman not only is up for the challenge but seems to want even more of a challenge.
I don’t know why there’s not 4K. The newest update was January 25, 2022. The scenes have 1080p, 720p and 480p downloads. There are picture sets you can download. I would recommend not reading the synopsis for each scene. The stereotypes are beat to death on this site. If you’re into anal, MILF, dual penetrations. There is content you will like. You have to have tempered expectations. The ads are the best way to end this review. This site is part of Analized. Analized is part of Full Porn Network. Those are somehow related to Porn Force and those are related to James Deen’s site. I thought I was getting all of them. Instead, I only got 6 anal sites. I will have to figure out which one gets the sites I was wanting.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site is part of the Full Porn Network, which advertises that is has over 15 different sites. I counted 21 sites currently.
-Can use PayPal or Epoch as your biller.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Site updates with 1 new video every 5 days.
-Videos come with a photoset and screen cap set.
-The videos are crystal cleal, crisp, good lighting, good sound control, nice sets, etc.
-They advertise 4K definition for some of the videos. However, at this site, the maximum definition is 1080p.
-You can comment on the videos, but many of the videos have no member comments.
-Videos come with tags that basically describe the sex action/plot of the video.
-You can choose 1024 or 1600 zip for your photosets.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading, as far as I can tell.
-Download options include: 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K.
The site shows a 4K option for some videos, but the links to download 4K and 1080p didn't work for me.
Cons:
-Expensive site and expensive network.
$119.88 for the first year.
Or $39.95/month.
But I joined at $60 for the first year, on a holiday promotion.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-First member page after logging in is a page of ads, no site content.
-Ads at top and bottom of each member page.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is below average for many teen sites such as Teen Mega World, and far below the average of the Wow network models.
-Videos are often 10 minutes runtime or less.
-Streaming options are 480p and 720p for the latest site videos. Which is disappointing, because the network advertises 4K videos.
-Many photosets are small. Only 15 photos per set. The photos are excellent, shot by a professional photographer, well-focused, well-lighted, but the action covered is only a part of the video. However, when the photosets are larger, the quality of the photos goes way down. I don't know if it's a photoshop problem or what. Sets are not worthwhile collecting.
Bottom Line:
A partial listing of the sites you get access to with a membership in the network:
Analized
Bad Daddy POV
DTF Sluts James Deen
Only Prince
POV Perverts Twisted Visual
Your Mom Does Porn
The James Deen site is the most famous site in the network. James Deen is the owner of the network, and he has made a name for himself in the porn world, with a lot of female fans who think he is not only cute, but strong and dominant in the way he treats women in his videos.
The network features rough sex, a lot of anal sex, where the women are treated like sluts.
The site theme is fake incest: a bad stepfather has sex with his stepdaughter.
The site is supposed to be educational. Which is misleading. I didn't find any helpful clues about how to treat a girl during sex.
The intro section of each video starts with the disclaimer:
"ATTENTION
The performance you are about to watch is meant for entertainment purposes only. It should not be seen as a model for real-life sexual encounters. We recommend honest, clear, and ongoing communication with your partner(s) before any sexual encounter. All actors in this film are consenting adults who follow specific adult industry regulations. Please have fun, respect each other, and practice safe sex."
However, that disclaimer is for legal purposes only.
In an interview James Deen gave, he said underage teens could watch his videos and get a good idea of how to have exciting sex.
The titles of some of the videos seem to be instructional.
For example, "Brooke Haze: Helps You Cum With Jerk Off Instructions".
I was slightly disappointed with that video, and other videos with a similar title.
For one thing, the video is a solo model video, where the girl role-plays being your step-daughter and slowly strips while talking dirty.
I was hoping a guy would be there, and the girl could show you the best way to masturbate while watching the video.
But I guess you're left on your own, to figure out how to masturbate, because there is no guy in the video showing you the best moves.
Actually, the Jerk Off Instruction videos follow the same pattern.
A short video, 10 minutes or less, features a teen model stripping and talking dirty.
So there's no real instruction.
The model touches herself, but if there's any passion, it's in what you yourself bring to the video. The model is putting on a show, so if that's enough to get you off, fine. But many porn site videos with solo models feature masturbation, and this site, for the Jerk Off Instruction series, is mainly tease with dirty talking. When I say tease, I mean the dirty talking, the self-fondling, the nudity is supposed to turn you on, because you are watching young girls playing with themselves and stripping and role-playing talking to you as their daddy.
The videos where the girl is with a stunt cock are better. The girl and her step-father have sex. The step-father is usually off-screen. I guess you are supposed to place yourself into the scene as the step-father. Sometimes the step-father punishes the girl by slapping her ass, but it's mild punishment, and the girl undressses following the step-father's instructions, because slapping a girl's ass covered by clothes is not as effective or as fun as slapping a naked ass.
And you need a way to get the clothes off the girl if you're going to fuck her anyway.
(The plots are simple in the site videos.)
The sex at the site is less rough and not as brutal as some of the other sites in the network.
The girls put on a show, and the idea of sex with your stepdaughter is prominent, but the girls don't show a lot of resistance at having sex with their stepfather.
Sex with a step- is supposed to be kinky, but a common theme in porn in the last few years.
I thought the site was one of the tamer sites in the network.
The network mainly features rough sex, anal sex, and treating the girls as sluts who want to be dominated.
This site features girls who are role-playing to a step-father who wants to have sex with his daughter.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU lists the membership price at $59.95/month, with a PU discount of $39.99/month recurring.
Or a 1 year membership for $119.88.
I found a holiday discount of $59.95 for the first year. So if you want to join the network, or one of its sites, I suggest waiting for a holiday discount, since it's so much cheaper.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-The network includes about 20 different sites. The most famous one is JamesDeen.com, because James Deen has made a name for himself as a porn star.
-There is a large amount of hardcore videos at the network. Some videos available in 4K, most are available in 1080p and lower definitions.
-Content is exclusive.
-If cookies are enabled, you don't have to enter your login details, you are automatically entered into the site once you click on the "login" link.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Easy to use slide-show program for viewing photosets.
-Photosets have 2 choices of definition for a zip file: 1024p and 1600p.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Photoset default filename includes the model's name, title of the set, and file definition.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Sometimes your login details fail to work. You have to try to get new login details, or play around with your old login details hoping it will get you into the network.
-Rocketgate is the default biller. I think CCBill or Famesupport are easier to deal with.
-I don't believe I got a confirming email on my membership. Which creates problems. Especially if the site does not recognize your login details. Rocketgate, the default biller, does not seem very responsive about confirming your membership, even though they were the biller I used to join, and I sent them my name, email address, the last four digits of my credit card I used to join, and the amount and date of my join.
-The photosets are shot by a professional photographer: so the photos are real photos and not screencaps.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
The photos are well lit. But the photos fail to emphasize the physical beauty of the models (even when some of the models are naturally attractive). Riley Reid is attractive, but her photosets present her as a plain-looking girl. Chloe Cherry comes across a litte better. Chloe can be a fine-looking model, but I don't want to save any of her photosets: I want a model to be attractive, or seductive, or somebody I can fantasize about fucking. But the photosets of Chloe are not appealing. I'd rather look at photos of the meat hanging in a butcher's shop, which, while not sexual, can be interesting because I know the meat can be transformed into a delicious meal. Looking at Chloe's photos, I get turned off by her skin tones, by how un-attractive she appears.
And that's for the good looking models, who are in the minority of models.
The majority of the site models are plain to unattractive.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The network gives you access to about 20 different porn sites. The most famous site is JamesDeen.com, because he's made a name for himself as a porn star. There's some controvery about James Deen: he's been accused of abuse by some of his sex partners. Deen claims he's innocent and can't understand why women would complain about his rough treatment of them during sex. He's just a simple, innocent guy who enjoys slapping women, spitting on them, twisting their arms to make them moan, and showing sluts that he's the master who controls these cunts with his powerful cock. And he smiles a lot, which shows he's just a good old boy from Pasadena, California.
The network features rough sex. A lot of anal sex. The models are usually called sluts, and treated as pieces of meat. Women are to be used and abused, because men are dominant creatures.
The models are sluts: So you get lots of tattoos and implants.
Even the cute models come across as trailer trash whores.
I enjoy softcore and hardcore. But this network doesn't appeal to me. Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film, two competing sites, are much more interesting and enjoyable. For one thing, Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film features more attractive models. Some of the sex scenes at Rocco and Devils Film can be intriguing. And hot.
Whereas the full porn network scenes focus on rough sex, anal sex, treating the women like pieces of meat.
There is a channel called "Sex Games". It appears to be an adult animation channel, where you can play with cartoon figures and fap (masturbate).
Edit: My mistake. The "Sex Games" link, although placed at the top of the page as a normal channel, is actually a separate site, and not part of the Full Porn Network.
The reason I'm leaving it in this review is the "Sex Games" site appears to be very impressive.
A lot of thought and skilled technical knowledge went into making the site.
Joining that site is free.
I recommend checking it out.
Although free porn sites are not reviewed at the PU site, the free site seems intriguing.
I wish there were more hours in a day, because the questions they ask of your thoughts and desires, and the quality of the cartoon images, is just amazing at dirtyfapgame. I haven't joined the site yet, but I hope to join soon.
Getting back to Full Porn Network:
This is personal taste, but the vibe of the network does not appeal to me:
I want young girls who look attractive, and seem to enjoy sex.
The theme of the network is rough sex, anal sex, treating girls and women as sluts who should be abused, because men are dominant creatures, and girls are happiest when you spit on them, force them into painful and uncomfortable positions, slap them around, all in the nature of treating women as they secretly desire.
So if you fantasize about rough sex, anal sex, then the network might be appealing.
Especially if you can get a holiday special for around $60 for the first year.
Otherwise, the PU discounts are OK, but way too high for my budget.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Currently a special discounted price of $60 for the first year. Renews at $29.95/month.
So be sure to cancel before your membership renews.
Note: Be sure to join through the Full Porn Network site, which has the $60 for the first year discount. If you join through the James Deen site, or one of the other sites in the network, you will pay much higher prices, even with a PU discount.
-Part of the Full Porn Network. You get access to 18 different sites. The James Deen site is probably the most famous site in the network.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You get a new video every 3 or 4 days.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. Don't have to enter your login details. Just go to the site, and you are automatically logged in.
-Login details are simple: your username is your email address. You can choose your password.
-I'm not gay. But if I were gay, just looking at the colorful thumbnail of James Deen, with his wide-open smile, his (CONTINUED)
Cons:
bright blue eyes, his incredibly handsome face, and his slender body, would make me cream my pants. And his two-thumbs up gesture, showing how much he appreciates life, would be enough to give me a double orgasm.
-The model listing has nice, oversized thumbnails of the models and stunt cocks. The only problem is there are so many ads on each page, that there is only room for 16 thumbnails per page, so you have to click through 56 pages to see all the models and stunt cocks at the James Deen site. That's a lot of clicking.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Site and network have plenty of ads. You get a page of ads when you first log in, before you get to the member's area. Then you have ads on every page in the member's area.
-Because each page has so many ads (ads for sites included in the Full Porn Network and ads for other competing sites), there is very little room for thumbnails showing you the content from the James Deen site. (CONTINUED)
Bottom Line:
You have to click through a lot of pages to find the videos that belong to the James Deen site.
I don't think I've ever seen a site with so many ads per page.
-The thumbnails of the models (and stunt cocks) are not flattering to the models. Some of these models are attractive women at other sites, but not here. The site treats the models like meat, and makes no effort to portray them attractively.
-The selection of models is porn star lite. Most of the models look like trailer trash, except that people living in trailers probably look cleaner and more attractive than the trailer-trash models at the James Deen site. I like my models to be young and pretty, and the model selection is a real turnoff for me.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The Full Porn Network covers the following niches:
anal, fetish, trans, bdsm, rough sex, hardcore, role play, high definition, 4k UHD, romance, reality, teens, milf.
James Deen, the star of the site, has an amazing story.
He started in porn in 2004 when he was 18.
All he wanted to do was to have some fun. To meet some girls.
By 2012-02-02 he had starred in over 4,000 porn videos, and was the youngest person to win the porn "Male Performer of the Year" award.
What's so astounding is that, in spite of the massive female fanbase who adore him, he's just an "aw-shucks, regular guy", with curly brown hair and bright blue eyes who doesn't understand why he's so famous and lovable.
"I have no idea," Deen said. "I really, really have no clue."
I think of James Deen, growing up in a log cabin in Pasadena, an upscale community in Los Angeles County.
He claims that he first became interested in porn when he was in kindergarten and found an old porn magazine.
"I picked it up and I'm like, 'Oh my God, this is the cool, this is awesome,'" he said. "It was this weird moment that I will always remember where I was like, this is what I want to be when I grow up. I want to do this."
This story reminds me of Abraham Lincoln, who also grew up poor in the backwoods of Kentucky, and yet he rose to become the 16th president of the United States.
Deen is a humble man, just as Lincoln was.
"I don't market myself at all, I really don't," Deen said. "I just kind of be me."
And yet, they are both recognized as great men in their professions.
Imagine, if you will, if Deen, instead of reading an old porn magazine when he was five years old, had, instead, read a copy of the US Constitution, that he might have become the son to President Donald Trump, and carried on his adopted father's political career. Deen might have even married Ivanka Trump, and founded his own political dynasty.
Deen has the humbleness, the greatness, to make America great again.
That is why I watch Deen's porn videos with bated breath: Deen is a younger version of Donald Trump. And with every thrust of his vibrant cock into the willing pussy or ass of his sex partners, he proves that women love to be abused and treated roughly.
In 2015, several women, including his ex-girlfriend Stoya, said they were sexually abused by Deen. Stoya claimed that Deen raped her, and ignored her using the safe word telling him to stop.
Deen denied all these allegations as defamatory. He says he respects women and their civil liberties.
Deen, like Donald Trump, is a champion of women's rights.
Although these attacks by women in 2015 might have destroyed Deen's porn career, he was able to deny all accusations of illegal conduct and claim he was baffled by the accusations.
Basically, James Deen is an American porn superstar who loves women and treats them with the respect they deserve.
Bottom line summary:
What do you get at the James Deen site?
Rough sex, where unattractive models are fucked up the pussy and ass, slapped and spit on, arms twisted behind their backs to make them moan in pain. Treating women like they should be treated, because men are the dominant creatures who enjoy abusing these cunts. James Deen is the master of bringing his artistic vision of women to the screen: And the women love him for it, as they moan and groan and gag on the thick cocks jammed down their throats.
There is a disclaimer at the start of each video that states:
"The performance you are about to watch is meant for entertainment purposed only. It should not be seen as a model for real-life sexual encounters. We recommend honest, clear, and ongoing communication with your partner(s) before any sexual encounter. All actors in this film are consenting adults who follow specific adult industry regulations. Please have fun, respect each other, and practice safer sex."
The notice is legal boilerplate, that is meant to protect the site. It's a common joke that many models have been abused on site, with no attention paid to the boilerplate claims. The models in the videos are called sluts, whores, bitches. Because this is gonzo porn, and the models have to be treated with the respect they deserve.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A glorious tribute to the always growing stepfamily niche of porn!
188 scenes with updates coming in every 3-4 days.
Pretty girls and settings that will make you believe these are barely legal girls.
Jerk Off Instruction scenes included, I believe these scenes could be the easiest way for straight women to get into watching a solo woman.
Not a lot of download options, but they do have 480p, 720p and 1080p
Navigation is good and site includes access to the Full Porn Network.
Cons:
I have admitted I like perversion, but there are some of these settings that are going to push your button for, "is that going too far?"
Site is a little cluttered with 3 ads across the top and 4 across the bottom.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to explain the settings part since it made me laugh, but may be a little too perverse for some. Some of the scenes happen in an all-pink bedroom. There are stuffed animals, glittery curtains, all the stereotypical items you would expect to see in a little girl's bedroom. They do go out of their way to point out all their models are 18 or older and they do not condone incest. Part of the scenes are Jerk Off Instruction. I wouldn't say I have had any problems being attracted to watching young women masturbate, but for some women there is a stigma that comes with watching other women masturbate. I do think these Jerk Off Instruction scenes directed at men, can be an easy introduction to porn for women who are not used to watching it. I do believe most women had at least one moment in their life where they thought about teasing a guy and talking him step by step through how she wants him to masturbate for her. I could be wrong, but I have introduced the niche to other women and they like it too.
The other scenes are filmed from a POV orientation of the Bad Daddy. Who is supposed to be the stepdad having sex with his stepdaughter. I do think this site does this style of porn very well. Most of the stepfamily sites I have joined and even liked use humor or unbelievable stories to show you it's not real. This site doesn't. Since you don't really see the stepdad it's more about seeing the young woman looking seduced, curious and aroused by this charming older man. I like it.
They are nearing 200 scenes. These scenes each come with a small photo set you can download and the videos have 480p, 720p and 1080p download options. It's a simple site and that's not a bad thing. The biggest reason I returned to this site and network was I saw where they had a new Karma Rx scene and she's probably my favorite. I noticed rearadmiral's comment about the age of the models being too high to fit the stepdaughter role and can see that, even with Karma Rx who I believe is late 20's. I guess we just have to use a little more suspension of belief and figure the mom's a cougar with a younger husband!
The scenes while lacking the humor of a site like Family Strokes, there are times I do find myself laughing. Whether it's bad acting or really bad use of words. They do push the serious side of the site, but not as much as all their disclaimers make you expect. The site and network is worth a try. There is a lot of good content on the site and network. This site is the reason I came back. I do think it's interesting that I know more women who like the Jerk Off Instruction scenes more than the number of men that do. Recommended for those that like a little perversion in their porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A 16 site network of sites that are mostly rough and anal-centered. Would that be analcenteric?
Most of the scenes have 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K video download options.
The network has updated 9 times over the last week.
Pretty models in about 80% of the scenes.
Well-known models even for me, but there are some amateurs.
Mixture of male/female, threesomes, group of men with one woman.
Photos and screencaps can be downloaded. The photos include pictures of just the female.
Cons:
This one was not on my list to join, but I decided to be open-minded and try it. It's probably time to stop opening my mind.
The James Deen site seems to be the dominant site here and the newer updates include old scenes on it. I think that's also a con for the network since those are shown as network updates.
The amount of lube they go through. They must have something like a 55 gallon barrel of it.
More implants than I like to see. I don't mind the tattoos as much.
Do they put the cheapest mascara on the women to get it to run down their face like that?
Scenes shared between the sites.
Bottom Line:
A lesson in being newer to joining sites outside of my safe 8-10 sites I like, don't have multiple sites open when deciding which to join. Despite joining this on what I'm going to call an accident, I'm going to try and be as fair and as objective as possible.
I would have listed all of the sites included and listed how many scenes they each have, but there are several sites on this network that just have scenes from the other sites on them. The site DTFSluts has scenes from James Deen and Analized on it. The site Your Mom Does Porn has scenes from at least 4 of the other network sites. I'm not looking to give them any extra credit.
The whole network has 1,699 scenes. When I had added them up going by each site it was over 3,000, that should add some perspective to how many scenes they are sharing between their sites.
There are some scenes I liked. It seems like the older scenes are not quite as "me, caveman" as the newer scenes.
The quality of the videos is good except for the random 720p max scene they throw in. The oldest scenes on the network have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The photos are also what I think are studio photo sets, they are small, but those focus on the female model before the scene starts. You get to see how pretty she is before the scene ends. Maybe that's a porn conspiracy? Women that watch this porn are not going to be willing to do these acts. The models go from 7-10 to 1-3. Some of them look like they got drunk and decided to stick the big end of the wine bottle up their butt, fell asleep in that position and woke up with a hangover and a 4 inch diameter wine bottle in their butt.
I know there is a market for this type of porn. There's nothing wrong with that. I admit, I laugh and heckle the small dick porn sites like on Pure CFNM.
Which is what the guys on this network remind me of. They were once laughed at by a woman and now it's their turn.
There are various disclaimers and warnings on the videos. I didn't think the actual sex was that hardcore for the disclaimers to be needed, but it seems to be more about the treatment of the women. The most common disclaimer talks about consent, probably should say, "We didn't tie this woman up and fill her with roofies."
Some of the sex is quite good. Some of the women look like they could have added 3 more guys and they wouldn't have cared. There is a light at the end of the tunnel, I really tried to work an anal joke in, the site Big Daddy POV has some solo scenes for jerk off instruction. I thought those were good and those work just as much for women as men. Though I do think they go overboard with this site's production values. Most of the models are dressed in pink, in a pink bedroom with little glittering lights behind them, some are hugging their teddy bears. I can see a site like Nubiles doing that since their models look 18-19, but some of these models on Big Daddy POV look in their 30s.
Maybe the most important part to know and it's why I also reviewed the James Deen site is more than 50% of the total videos come from the James Deen site which kind of deflates that 16 sites included sales pitch.
If you're really into the more dominant male style of porn you'll probably like this. I'm not even against dominant male porn. I just thought they could have executed everything a little better. Bringing moans into screams with any sex act can be very arousing. Bending a woman's arms up to the back of her head, slapping her, maybe even a few eye pokes in there, trying to fit your dick and fist in her at the same time is just a little too much for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Straightforward, gonzo style porn featuring James Deen.
846 scenes with new scenes added regularly, but not on a set schedule.
Photos, screencaps and videos can be downloaded.
Videos go up to 4K, some oddities in the video quality specifications.
Mostly rough sex if you're into that.
Blend of scenes which will be in cons too. Male/female, threesomes, casting, etc...
Cons:
This seems like some kind of best of James Deen site. There are scenes from other sites and other studios and scenes from JamesDeen.com. This causes the next con.
The video quality varies from scene to scene. Based on user comments some of the scenes are very old and are being "found" one comment says, "Great find", it is one of the newest scenes released, but tops out at 720p.
I was only a little familiar with James Deen. The scenes are as much about him putting what looks like wrestling holds on women as sex.
Navigation is poor.
Bottom Line:
I once read an article about James Deen being porn's "boy next door". I remember the article well. It talked about how women loved being in scenes with him because he was gentle and so nice.
So, what happened? You know you're going to get a scene that might be harsh when it has a 20 second warning before the scene starts that explains everyone in the scene is a consenting adult, no one is being forced and people watching should not try this at home. In one scene, he has the woman's arms pulled up behind her back while bending her over a sofa.
It's not that the scenes are bad. It's more like a feeling that you know what's going to happen in every scene. She's not going to moan enough from the sex so he's going to bend her arms behind her head or slap her.
He's really not as obnoxious as I expected. It does seem like he gets off on the woman feeling pain, but other than that, it's very basic and straightforward sex. He really doesn't look big enough to seriously hurt anyone. I just was expecting some of that content of the "boy next door". It's more like the guy you picked up at the bar.
There are tags, clickable model names and that's the limit of the navigation. The site could be put together better. It looks like the most time spent was on the terribly written scene descriptions like, "He continued fucking her from behind as he pull her by the hair and neck. Halfway through it, he pins her down and gets power fucking to the next level. It may be a rough fucking for Sadie, James was nice enough to lick her fuck holes from time to time." That is about 1/8th of the scene description.
The biggest problem is the scenes are from different sites. I even saw one from Bang.com and it says on it, "Exclusive Bang.com scene" on James Deen's site. This does make the quality of the scenes vary throughout the site.
The time of the scenes also varies greatly from 19 minutes to 55 minutes. If you like James Deen and like rough sex, especially anal, you would probably like this site. For me, it's an okay site with some good scenes thanks to the women in the scenes.
You can download videos, photo and screencaps. The video quality is hard to describe or list since they are blending in James scenes from other sites. One of the newest is with a model that has bios up saying she retired in 2014. Maybe the Coronavirus is causing them to bring in these scenes from other sites?
You could do worse than this site, but I think your odds would be just as good to do better.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Rocketpay a reliable biller and Epoch is not
-Can join with Paypal or giftcards
-The whole network is focused on anal
-The network archive has 314 scenes
-Nice tag system for searches
Cons:
-Prechecked cross sell on sign up page
-Advertising on members pages
-Search turns up locked videos you pay extra for
-James Deen is the major star and producer
Bottom Line:
Analized is a network of five anal focused sites with a total of 314 updates.
The scenes are basically standard gonzo type porn with no premise or plot and the action is occasionally playful, but mostly it is a bit rough and forceful. The women wear the outfits that have been overused in gonzo type porn for years. I see too many boring fishnet stockings, stripper outfits and the like. The videography is very professional as are the pornstars. Mostly they are Americans who have done a lot of anal scenes in the past, but quite a few scenes have some of the better Euro anal pornstars.
There are many double penetrations and often you see threesomes or even foursomes.
I see two male stars that may or may not be appealing to you. One is James Deen, the major male lead and producer of many of the videos. He has a reputation for being abusive as well as disrespectful to his female costars and is not well liked by many in the industry.
The other is Prince Yashua. He is a fine performer, but has been over used in porn. Many find him to be a bit boring.
Anal Violation- Updates every two weeks, 77 updates. This one has the roughest focus of these sites.
Her Gape- The last update was August, 44 updates
Your Mom Does Anal-irregular schedule, 53 updates
Teenage Anal Sluts- updates every two weeks, 80 updates.
Anal BBC- Interracial black on white, updates every two weeks, 60 updates. Most scenes use the same black man, Prince Yashua. The site seriously needs some variety.
I would recommend this network if you are a fan of some of the stars. As far as the typical porn customer, you can do better if you want well made anal scenes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 190-200 scenes with regular updates (about 1 video per week)
- As the name implies all scenes include anal sex. They are well filmed with lots of closeups, ATM, deepthroating and generally a focus on relatively rough sex (expect some breath play and slapping, but it doesn't really get into BDSM territory). I assume most scenes are directed by James Deen (at least 90 videos feature him) since they all mostly have a similar approach: an few minutes of intro with just the girl moving around (no interview), no real set up (there are some very bare bones stories, but they are easy to ignore) and it quickly transitions into a pretty hardcore scene.
- Lots of interesting positions and generally really good looking models that seem to get into the scene. I don't believe they have any girls that are really exclusive or brand new to the industry, but the models they have all give excellent performances.
- Overall fast download speeds.
Cons:
- Pretty difficult to navigate the site, categories are not easy to navigate, no easy way to filter male models from the model view, no easy way to see which scenes have photos or just screencaps. Videos auto-play and the ads are a bit intrusive (sometimes placed right under the video). Overall this is a super bare bones site. The search category works well enough, but it's not enough.
- Most scenes are boy-girl, not a lot of variation as far as threesomes or lesbian scenes. Not necessarily a con, but they have a formula and stick to it.
- Doesn't seem like there is a good way to grab a zipped archive of the photos (I swear I saw a .zip link on some pages, but it doesn't seem like it's always present. Either way, not a great site if you're looking for photos)
- While fast, sometimes when downloading a scene I couldn't stream something else.
Bottom Line:
I'm a bit conflicted on this site. On one hand many of the scenes are incredibly hot, with the models seeming to really get into it. The sex is rough, but never gets into an uncomfortable territory (there is no puking, not a lot of double anal or "push her limits" kind of sex). The models are mostly well known performers you can see other places as well, but the scenes here are all well shot and often a bit more rough than what the models normally shoot.
That's all the positive stuff, the negative is the site itself. For the most part it works, but the design is very bare bones and I've had it timeout on me several times. There are no zipped archives of the photos or screencaps (and often the photos don't contain all the action shown in the videos). When browsing the site, the screen-caps of the scenes are not that descriptive, don't show a preview when you hover over them and if you click into one the video starts playing right away (on my phone often at a much lower resolution than what my wifi can handle) Overall, a lot of small issues that just made me not want to bother logging in and browsing around. Oh and when downloading the videos they have a generic name, instead of the model or the scene name.
Technical issues aside the content here is pretty good, as long as you're interested mostly in boy-girl anal. For the most part they don't have interviews, the girls are already mostly naked and there are no BTS videos. It's all pretty standard porn, without a focus of glamour shots like Tushy or a lot of rimming and ass eating like TrueAnal.
That said performers do switch positions a lot and there are a lot of great shots of anal against a wall as well as some great ass to pussy shots that look really good.
It ultimately comes down to how interested you are in seeing their selection of models in pretty energetic, but relatively standard anal scenes. I've found at least 40 scenes that are absolutely top notch and will make it into my library, but your mileage may vary.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- 20 videos
- Updates with one new scene per week
- Mainstream porn with a little kink
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- Scenes start streaming automatically
- Deceptive tour pages
- Expensive for whats currently offered
- No TBP discount
Bottom Line:
Recently there have been several new sites available that feature porn in the step-father / step-daughter niche. Among those are Daughter Swap and Dad Crush, both of which are great sites. Add to this list Bad Daddy POV.
The site only started back in January so its still pretty small with only 20 videos currently uploaded. The good news is that it is growing, albeit slowly, with one new scene being added weekly. (A mark against the site is that the tour page is set up to make it look like there are a lot more videos than there actually are. With 15 videos on the first page and four pages youd think that there could be up to 60 videos. Clicking on any other page on the tour brings you to the join page. But there are only 20 videos as of this review.)
The scenes are similar to what youd find on most other sites in this niche. The step-dad and step-daughter find themselves home alone and some scenario is concocted to get them in a compromising position. If youre a porn writer you can come up with dozens of short plots and youll find those here. The most common plot here seems to be that the daughter wants something (money, car, etc.) and barters with Daddy for it. After that most scenes turn into a normal hardcore scene.
This is an entirely subjective opinion, but it seems to me that this niche is best done by using models who are younger, as in 18-22 or at least look younger by being petite. Part of this is because this niche usually relies on some power imbalance to drive the plot and the heat. If you agree with me on this, then some of the models on this site aren't a great fit. Are they beautiful? Definitely. But Romi Rain is 29 and its hard for the viewer to see her as a step-daughter to someone only 10 years her senior. Likewise with models like Jessa Rhodes. She is obviously beautiful but I think the fact that she has a seriously augmented chest detracts from the viewer seeing her as a nave step-daughter.
Im not generally a fan of any POV scenes so I may be a bit biased, but the POV camerawork here isn't as good as it is on some other sites. I found that when the action really gets going the camera can become a bit too shaky.
The scenes are all available in three resolutions, all of which are in MP4 format. They are 854x480 (3000 kb/s), 1280x720 (5000 kb/s) and 1929x1080 (8000 kb/s). Most of the scenes are quite short by typical standards with the average length being around 12 minutes. There are several scenes that are under 10 minutes but that also means that most members can download the 1080p scenes since the file size isn't huge given the scene length.
The site is logically laid out and simple to use, but on a site this small thats what youd expect. There are tags on the scenes for some of the more common porn searches but there is no specific search function. But given that this is relatively standard porn thats not really an issue: youll find oral and vaginal sex and not anything kinkier than that. (Apparently step-daughters dont do anal with their step-fathers)
Screencaps are available but only as singles. Its fair to say, however, that this is a video site and not a photo site.
The site supports download managers and I found download speeds at what I see at most porn sites, which is to say its good. I didnt encounter any links timing out or hit a download limit but given that there are only 20 scenes and the file sizes are reasonable I wouldnt have expected any issues like that.
A minor quibble is that when you open a page for a scene it starts streaming automatically. I really wish sites would stop doing that.
I wouldnt ordinarily do this, but while I like this site there are better choices out there for anyone interested in this niche. You can get a better value with Dad Crush which has more scenes and has an introductory price thats half what Bad Daddy POV charges. If you agree with my opinion above that this niche requires models with a certain look then Dad Crush is also the better choice. My personal favourite in (sort of) this niche is Daughter Swap. But it isn't strictly step-father / step-daughter porn. Instead, there are two father/daughter couples where the fathers swap their daughter to the other guy.
Im really on the fence as to whether I can recommend this site or not. The porn is generally good and site is well thought-out and easy to use. If you really like this niche (or really like POV) then this site may be worth a look. But at the full price of $30 USD for a small site it might be best waiting until the site grows a bit more, lowers the price to reflect the site size before joining or offers a TBP discount. Or you can follow one of my above recommendations and join a competing site until things improve at Bad Daddy.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Approximately 100 scenes
- Updates frequently (every five days)
- Top porn models
- Well-produced scenes
- All anal
- Bills through Epoch
- Allows download managers
Cons:
- Most (if not all) of the scenes are also available at James Deen
- No TBP discount
Bottom Line:
There is no way that a site can be called Analized and not have me as a member so I joined even before it was listed here at TBP/PU. The site delivers as advertised but, as Ill explain, even though it offers some great anal-themed porn I cant recommend it but I can make a recommendation that will be a better value.
The site is currently quite large with approximately 100 scenes available. Thats good news but the better news is that it is also updating frequently with a new video being added every five days.
The scenes are mostly standard-fare porn, with all of them featuring anal sex. Some are playful, others are rough. They all feature a whos who of the current crop of A-list porn stars who do anal. The scenes are generally well shot, lit and edited. This is not an amateur site in any meaning of that word.
The scenes can be streamed or downloaded. Downloads are available in multiple resolutions but the only file type is mp4. I downloaded the 1280x720 files as they are a good compromise on file size versus how they look. They have a 5000kb/s bitrate and are 30 fps. They look good on a 24 monitor and a 50 TV.
I had no problem using a download manager to queue the scenes and I didnt encounter any download limits or obvious throttling on the first day of my membership when I downloaded a lot of the scenes.
The site is logically laid out and easy to use. Scenes can be sorted in the most common ways used by most sites.
A minor negative with the site is that it features a lot of scenes with James Deen as the male talent and given the controversy around Deen these days that may be a deal-breaker for some potential members.
The fact that this site is affiliated with James Deen (both the man and the site that carries his name) is also one of the biggest reasons to not recommend this site. Coincidentally, I joined Analized and James Deen around the same time and there is a lot of overlap between the two sites. In fact, it is possible, and even probable, that every scene offered at Analized is also offered at James Deen and theyre offered with the same file specs too. But when you factor in that James Deen gives you (likely) everything that you can get at Analized and also gives you a lot more it makes sense to skip Analized and take a membership at James Deen instead. James Deen has around 6 times the number of scenes and James Deen offers a TBP discount that Analized doesnt.
The bottom line is that while Analized is a great site and it has some great anal-themed porn you can get the same scenes and lots more for less money over at James Deen. So while Im not recommending this site it isn't because its a bad site, its just that you can avoid the mistake I made and save some of your porn dollars.
And in case youre wondering, I scored Analized as a stand-alone site and as such it is very good so I wanted to reflect that, but Im not recommending it simply because you can get the same porn on a bigger and cheaper site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 580+ scenes
- Updates every four days
- Many A-list models
- Mix of plot-based and gonzo porn
- Downloads now available
- Multiple download and streaming options
- Supports download managers
- Bills through Epoch
Cons:
- The James Deen controversy may be too much for some
- Scenes start streaming immediately
Bottom Line:
Let me get something out of the way right at the start: yes, I am aware of the allegations made against James Deen last year and the controversy that now surrounds him. Im not deaf to that but as a porn collector there are scenes with models on this site that I wanted to collect. Should I have avoided this site because of the issues around Deen? Maybe, but thats not the point of this review. You can make your own decisions on whether or not youd join this site in light of the allegations.
The site offers a good mix of plot-based and gonzo porn, which is somewhat unusual. I like both but if you dislike one type there is still lots here for you to like. The gonzo scenes are typical Deen in that that theyre playful and the performers seem to be having a lot of fun. The sex is definitely rougher than a lot of mainstream porn but not in a BDSM way. Several of the plot-based movies are BDSM-themed though.
Given that Deen is one of the best known and most popular male models in the business he attracts some of the best known and most popular female talent too. This site is a whos who of A-list models.
The site is well laid out and shows attention to detail and that makes it very easy to find scenes that youll like. Members can sort the scenes by the upload date, by movie, by category and by channel. There are a dozen plot-based movies available for those who like plot-based porn. The categories page allows you to sort by most of the popular niches while the channels page is just slightly different in that it allows you to sort by behind-the-scenes, hardcore and things like that. I like behind-the-scenes stuff and there is a lot of it here and its easy to find because it is a separate channel. For oral fans there is also a way to sort Deens signature series I Came on James Deens Face and for some reason, there is a channel with Deen eating and enjoying food. I guess you can do whatever you want on your own site.
The site is quite large with about 580 scenes now uploaded. A new scene is added every four days or so meaning that that site will continue to grow.
Some really good news is that while the TBP review says that the site is streaming-only that is no longer the case as downloads are now available for everything. The site also supports download managers and I found that download speeds were always fast. I downloaded a lot in one day purposely trying to find a daily limit but I didnt hit one.
All scenes have at least two streaming and download options (usually 1080p and 480p) but many add a third 720p option. The 720p scenes have a 5000kb/s bitrate and the 1080p scenes have an 8000kb/s bitrate. Both are 30fps.
The TBP page also says that there is a full trial but I cant confirm that as I bought the full membership. Id be wary of the trial though since there is a lot of good stuff here, though if you do opt for the one-day trial you can be confident of an easy cancellation as Epoch is the biller. Another advantage is that TBP was recently able to offer a discount which makes this a great value.
The site really doesnt have much that Id complain about. When you load a page with a scene it starts streaming automatically and thats a pet peeve of mine but if thats all thats wrong with the site then I can live with it.
The bottom line is that this is a great site and I highly recommend considering a membership. The only reason that someone may want to avoid the site is due to some ethical considerations with the allegations against Deen. Otherwise, this is a great site and with the price offered through TBP its a great value for your porn dollars. Ill definitely rejoin in the future.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A-list porn stars
- Mainstream porn
- Good production values
- Serves some specific niches well
- Supports download managers
- Multiple viewing and downloading options
Cons:
- Small site (25 titles)
- No longer updating (last update May 2016)
- No TBP discount
- Scenes start streaming when link is opened
Bottom Line:
Im a fan of studio sites because I find that if I like the studio then Im apt to like a lot of the material they make available. A good example of this is New Sensations, which I join regularly simply because they offer a lot of porn in the niches I like. I wasnt really familiar with Arch Angel Video when I joined so I took a bit of a chance. I dont regret joining, but for those who may be contemplating a membership there are a few factors youll definitely want to know about.
The porn is high-quality and it falls right into the zone where many studios also aim. I guess if you offer something for everyone youre apt to get more customers. The production values are high, with professional lighting, sound and editing. The models are mostly A-list and all the porn aims for the mainstream where it isn't intentionally misogynistic and the women are the stars of the scenes (rather than sites where the males tend to want to make themselves the center of attention).
The site layout is simple and logical. Its the model used by many other sites: the main site is broken down into pages and each of the pages shows a DVD box cover. Each DVD opens into a separate page with the scenes shown with performer information, a brief description and tags. This may be just a pet peeve, but there are no download or streaming options on this page. Each scene must be selected and that opens into yet a third page with all the viewing options. This is definitely a pet peeve, and one Ill always complain about: the scene begins streaming automatically as soon as you open the link. Be sure to turn your speakers down.
Once at a scene page the viewer has a lot of options available. There are photos and screencaps available. Oddly, for 2016, the scenes are available as a series of clips too. Streaming and downloading both are available in four resolutions: 240p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. I downloaded the 720p scenes and they are 1080x720, 6000kb/s and 30fps. Those are good specs and the scenes look good on a 24 monitor and a 50 TV.
This isn't a pro or con, but the site does feature a lot of MILF/big breast porn for those who are into that. Its a higher percentage than on other studio sites. But dont worry if youre like me; there are still lots of young and petite models too. Interracial scenes are fairly common too, and many of those play up the big black cock stereotype.
The site isn't without some serious drawbacks, with the two big ones being related. First, the site is small with only 25 DVDs currently on offer. Second, it seems destined to stay small since the last update was five weeks ago at the end of May, 2016. I looked at the Arch Angel Productions list at IAFD and they are a small studio but I cant tell if they are still actively making new porn or not. To be safe, you may want to consider that if you join what you see is all of what you get and all of what youll ever get.
A secondary drawback to the site is that there is no TBP discount offered. With just 25 DVDs available this isn't a great value at $30.
The site supports download managers. (I use IDM and queue scenes for downloads.) I didnt have an issue with links timing out and download speeds were good.
The bottom line is that while the site offers some great porn with some of the best models in the business, and offers that porn across several popular niches, the fact that the site seems to have died on the vine makes it hard to recommend unless there is specific porn here that you must have. Even then, youll pay full price for it which makes it an okay value. A TBP discount would make it a much better value.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
