Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
An awesome site featuring amateur models and authentic sex!
The differences in models makes this site special and even unique.
Video quality is outstanding and downloadable.
Basic navigation that keeps everything simple and complete.
Daily updates to videos and pictures.
Cons:
The differences in models is unique and because of that, I see that as a possible con.
It is such a big site you won’t be able to fully use a subscription unless you join it for multiple months.
Boy/Girl scenes pale in comparison to the solo and lesbian scenes.
Bottom Line:
The most important aspect of Girls Out West is the difference in models. Body size, breast size, overall build, age, hair colors, race, there are models for everyone and for me nearly every scene is a must watch or must download.
The site is basic enough for even beginners. There are four tags to seperate the videos: All videos, solo videos, girl/girl videos and boy/girl videos. That’s a great way to start looking through the site since you may only like one of those niches or maybe you like them all. The quality of the videos is at the higher end of the industry-standard with true HD downloads. You also have options to download the videos in smaller resolutions. The videos have vibrant, but natural lighting. The photographs are as high of quality and can be downloaded.
The scenes feature solo, lesbian and hardcore sex. If you like solo porn you will love their solo videos and the same with lesbian. This is some of the best lesbian porn I have ever seen. The hardcore scenes are below average in quality in my opinion.
You will feel overwhelmed by the size of the site and especially when including updates. One month, I only downloaded the newest updates for the month and was very satisfied with just the updates. Bundling in the back catalog which has over 2,000 videos shows the massisiveness of the site.
My personal favorite part of Girls Out West is how believable the scenes are. The lesbian scenes feature women who look to generally enjoy and love sex with other women. The solo scenes are a blend of clear exhibitionists who believe they are masturbating for a crowd watching to sweet, shy and innocent young women giving a believable performance of having her first masturbation-induced orgasm. The hardcore scenes leave a lot to be desired. I’m from the belief that exhibitionists and voyeurs make the porn industry go ‘round, but these hardcore scenes play more like a real couple having standard sex.
It is a great site that offers arousing and exceptional scenes for those that are either exhibitionists or voyeurs.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Great site for those that likes variety in female models. Probably the best, even.
Very large site that I have been a member of for nearly a year and still don’t think I have seen everything.
Higher quality than I initially expected, and it has been high quality for a long time.
Some of the most realistic porn I have ever watched.
The navigation is very easy, and the categories help you find anything you are looking for.
Besides being a large site, it updates 6 times per week.
Cons:
The older scenes are lower quality and those are not even easy to find.
I don’t know that these are all amateur models. I recognize several of them and one of my favorites, I know she is on other sites. The amateur/pro label is probably stretched a little.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined Girls Out West, I really wasn’t for sure if I liked it. I do like a variety of models. It was one of the first sites I joined. I wasn’t really ready for this much variety. The variety is more than just skin complexion which they have a lot of different complexions. They also have very hairy models. They have heavier models, including close to Big Beautiful Women. It reminded me of a network that decided to stick all of its fetishes on one site. They do mix these models and types up. They will have a smaller woman with a big woman. A shaved woman with a very hairy woman. Kind of be prepared for that.
That is why I signed up for a year. The sex is very real. That made me want to see more. Over time, the model difference did not make much difference to me. I believe that is what they are going for. There are not a lot of stories or plots. It is more about emotion. This is advertised as a site owned by women and filmed by women. I don’t know how much difference that makes. I do see differences from regular porn. There isn’t anything robotic or planned. The scenes develop naturally. You don’t have that feel of “they have not done this yet; it’s going to be next”. You can’t do that on this site. I do believe it could throw your porn expectations balance out of whack.
The site size is very big and they have high quality. The videos have had 4K download option since 2017. They also offer 1080p, 720p and 576p. Even the 2012 videos have the 1080p and 720p options. They list over 2,000 videos that have at least 720p and 1080p. They do have picture sets you can download. I wasn’t expecting that the first time I joined it. I was thinking it’s an amateur site, they would not have high quality, but they do.
The part I was surprised by are the male with female scenes. There are not many of those. I didn’t expect any. I do not believe they are shooting anymore male with female scenes. The last I found was April 2020. Considering they update 6 days a week, I believe they would have had a new male with female scene if they were still filming that style. Besides being prepared for the variety of models, there are some things you have to get used to. Besides very hairy pubic areas some of these women have hairy armpits. That doesn’t bother me, but I know others have talked about not liking that. It is not something I find attractive, but with this style of porn, it is what they are going for. Very natural women and they are mostly all Australian. I have never been there. I don’t know if that is more common in Australia or not. Besides the small amount of male with female scenes there are some solo scenes too. I really liked those. The female models seem to be very comfortable and relaxed even going into the videos. I feel like I am getting a lesson in culture. The categories make this one of the few sites I have ever been on that the categories make sense and are accurate.
I always pay attention to the user ratings of scenes. I find that very interesting on these scenes. Some of the heavier models have solo scenes and are some of the highest rated scenes. Another blow to your porn expectation balance, the interviews are good and enjoyable to watch. Some of those have multiple females that are nude throughout the interview. They laugh, they touch each other and play around. My favorite scenes are the ones with more than 2 women. There is something about that I like. They do those lesbian threesomes better than anyone. My feelings on the looks of the models. There are some really cute and pretty females. There are some that look like normal, average women. I believe those will vary in popularity from person to person. I do believe that is what messed up my first time as a member. The combination of seeing the model as an average woman then seeing the huge pubic hair and hairy arms and armpits.
Besides that, the site is near perfect. I have heard the saying, your mileage may vary. I do believe the looks of the models could turn some people away. That is the double-edged sword of this site. Everything technical is right. I would recommend if you think you like it, join for longer than a month. The scenes can be long, the interviews are worth watching, especially if you like certain models that are in the interviews. I felt like it took me about 2 months to really like the site. It is now one of my favorite sites. I believe that is better than joining a site and being bored with it after 5 days. One of my favorites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
In my opinion - the best professionally produced girl on girl content I've come across. You can tell the actresses are genuinely in to their scenes, and in most cases more than likely are lesbian or bi-sexual in real life, not just putting on a show for the camera. Solo scenes are also great and equally as well done.
The content is filmed and produced by women, which probably helps the performances in the scenes come across as relaxed and genuine (real orgasms etc)
Large variety of body types for the models - ranging from petite to curvy, and borderline BBW in a couple of models. Some may see this is a negative as you may not find all models attractive - but for me it's a selling point. They cast mostly natural looking women too, who aren't afraid to be natural, so you'll find a lot of bush and and natural boobs rather than fake tits and perfectly shaved etc.
Vast amount of content dating back to 2004.
Regular updates - 4/5 a week from what I can tell.
Cons:
Advanced search function is poorly executed. All videos seem to only receive 4 or 5 'key word' tags - so for example, if you wanted to search for all videos involving threesomes, it wouldn't necessarily bring up every video involving a threesome, if 'threesome' wasn't considered a defining tag for that video. The only way to make sure you get all the content that matches your tastes is to literally trawl through it all, which with their vast amount of content, is a tough ask!
Very small collection of boy/girl content compared to girl/girl and solo scenes - and although the boy/girl content is filmed in much the same relaxed manner as their other content, I would say it's overall the weakest content of the 3 options, so would suggest looking elsewhere for that type of content.
The further back you go, the content quality is poor - but I would say everything from 2008 onward is watchable.
Not cheap - 29.50 monthly cost
Bottom Line:
I will start by stressing that this site wont be for everyone who's in to lesbian porn. If you're looking for girl on girl content, pairing the most conventionally attractive porn stars performing together on screen, this site might not be for you. If you're in to more natural/every day looking women, then I think this site will be the one for you, as the performances here can't be beaten. Real pleasure, real orgasms, real passion.
Vast amount of content - site stats suggest 1059 models, 345015 photos, and 4439 videos, and I have no reason to think this isn't correct from what I've seen.
Most of the scenes have a small amount of plot/acting to lead in to the action. I wouldn't say enough to please fans of porn with a plot, but equally it's not so much that it detracts from the scene for people who just like the action to start - a happy medium perhaps!
There's a fair bit of Behind The Scenes and Interview content with the performers too, so you can get to know them a bit, and helps covey how genuine the enjoyment and performances on the site are.
Full HD has been offered since 2013, 4K scenes creeping in around the start of 2017. As I stated in the cons, I think anything post 2008 seems to be perfectly fine to watch, but if you're fussy about your quality, the Full HD and 4K offerings would be worth a months membership to grab.
Although the monthly cost isn't cheap, it does include full access and downloads, so no hidden nasties. I managed to get it at half the advertised price with a quick google search for a discount too!
All in all - I think this is hands down my favourite site for girl/girl content. If they sorted out their tagging system, this would creep up to a 95 for me. For now - a solid 90.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Australian porn with I think all amateurs.
1,051 models and they vary in looks, body size, shape, hairy, shaven, very unique site in that regard.
At the time of the review, 4/29, 2020, they have 4,358 scenes and 2,692 photo sets.
Easy sign-up and cancel with Epoch.
Six new videos per week and 1 new photo set per week.
Deep advanced search that gives you over 100 tags/actions to filter.
Blend of solo, lesbian and boy/girl scenes.
Behind the scenes videos and photos.
Cons:
As appealing as their blend of models are, I also would think at least some of those models would be unappealing to some. Especially those against hairy.
Boy/girl section is much smaller than lesbian or solo with only 252 boy/girl scenes.
Bottom Line:
I figured I went outside my comfort zone for long enough. I enjoy these sites with amateurs, models with imperfections, models that probably would not be called models by some people. One of the first things I noticed is the scenes have a fun feeling to them. I do not get the feeling these models are under immense pressure like you see on some sites. I also do not feel like many of these young women are very shy, either.
I think the pros give a good overview of how much content this site has, and I didn’t know any of the models by name. Is it a pro or con that you’re probably going to need to stay on as a member for more than a month? It gives me the feeling it would be a good site to join for a year even. They have over a decade of consistent updating.
Before I go much further into the bottom line, I do want to go back to that first con. As a female, I don’t think I’m as critical of models looks as most guys are, but even saying that I would say there are 15-20% of these models that I didn’t find attractive. The other side of that is you’re going to find models that are very attractive, and you’ve never heard of them.
Most of the content here is what I would call female-friendly. It’s not softcore solo or lesbian. These are real women masturbating and as we all know when us non-porn stars masturbate; we are going for the fastest orgasm. It does lend itself to more expressive, more vocal, would sloppy be a negative word to use? I don’t mean it as such. I just mean this isn’t the masturbation you’re used to seeing on a major site. The lesbian scenes go from looking like real lesbians having sex with each other to the more playful lesbian scenes where the women look inexperienced.
You’re going to get random settings which I enjoy in porn. The solo scenes might be on an exam table, in a garage, on the bed, on the floor, in a cubicle, dinner table, outdoors and everywhere I think sex is possible.
The video quality is very good. They have 4K going back to 2017 and unless I missed something, all video scenes have 1080p, 720p and 480p. This includes remastering some of their “classic” scenes.
The boy/girl scenes are more inconsistent. It seems like some of the couples are possibly real couples, while others aren’t quite as interested in each other.
As a whole, this site does it a lot right. There are amateurs that are doing a good job of looking like pros. Some excellent solo videos and they explore a lot of fetishes from peeing to squirting to possibly the biggest collection of hairy models (body hair). I will have to join it again in the future. That could be its biggest con. It’s a lot of content to take in over one month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Girls Out West is an amateur softcore site that has been running for
14 years. It has a lot of content, and new content is released daily
- Currently they have 1010 models, over 300k hi-res photos and 4k hd
videos
- Good first-month-deal: $14,75 instead of $29
- The website is classy and the colours are a good fit. It is easy to
navigate, and the advanced search is simple to use
- All videos and photos link back to the models page, where you can
view all of their content plus a bio and other fun information about the
model
- Members can rate and comment on the models and individual videos,
and you can save your favourites
- All content is downloadable, with many different options for download
including 4k. There are many membership options, including a
lifetime membership
Cons:
- There is a daily download limit, but at 40GB it’s not so bad.
- Sometimes the videos take a little time to load, but this is possibly
because the server is in Australia.
- The big variability of models, while it means there is something for
everyone, also means that there may be some content that people
don’t like.
- The site only shows 16 items per search on each page, which
becomes a little annoying to click through
- Website- Style is not the best
Bottom Line:
GirlsOutWest is an Australian based amateur site featuring all Australian
models. It is mainly solo and lesbian focused, but it also has some BG
videos. It is owned, operated and produced by women, giving it a uniquely
feminine perspective.
The scenes are artistically filmed, sometimes with a lot of cuts between
different camera angles, and they are fond of close ups. Although the
models are amateurs, the people behind the camera are definitely
professionals.
The models are all completely natural, with and without hair, and many are
‘alternative looking’. Cute, butch, curvy, hippy, tomboys, they have every
type of model.
The sex is real and believable, and Girls Out West offers a unique insight
into the personalities of the models with their profile pages and ‘behind the
scenes’ question and answer videos with partner and group shoots.
Watching the videos, it is easy to see the connection the models have with
each other, and they don’t mind taking it slow to enjoy everything. The
filming reflects this, artistically focussing on the models’ enjoyment. It is a
fresh perspective on amateur porn, watching the mix of models
masturbating, exploring their bodies and having fun with each other, which
is a big yes for me.
However many of the more popular models have a lot of content,
sometimes it feels like they are more professional than amateurs. I enjoy
watching amateur porn to watch girls who are still new to the industry.
As well as this, I like watching porn to learn new kinks to try with my
girlfriend and that’s what I like about GOW best!
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I once questioned if this site was for me (2008 review of an 81), it's still around and it's now one of my favorites!
- One of the most unique porn sites on the internet.
- I could be wrong since some of these models could be on other sites but I don't know any of the models from anywhere except this site.
- They have a little of everything for everyone, as far as body types, pubic hair, and real amateur models.
- The site works well and loads quickly, important since I assume their servers are in Australia. DL speeds are very good (about 80% of my max).
- Despite the amateur genre, the content is very high quality.
- You won't ever feel like you're watching cookie-cutter porn on this site. Very unique scenes with what looks like real, believable sex.
- While you're not likely to find an Eve Angel here, I have found many favorites through the years and they all look like women I see in everyday life.
- Billing is handled by Epoch.
- No cross-sales
Cons:
- I will stress this one. In 2007 or 2008, whenever I reviewed this site originally, here at PU, I was neck deep in the Eastern European porn boom that seemed to churn out "perfect 10" models weekly. I questioned the quality of the models here at Girls Out West. And it's important to say, I still don't like every model and I would guess most porn users wouldn't like every model.
- This site has a true pro/con, that I'm listing as a con. It's addictive. The models are almost all new to you if you've never been a member and some are so cute or so pretty that you just have to check out their content. I've been a member for 3 months now after only meaning to join for 1 month.
Bottom Line:
It's worth mentioning that I've typed this out six times only to run out of characters before finishing and starting over. That hasn't happened since probably 2016. In short, Girls Out West, has been a fountain of youth for my porn interest. I once heavily criticized this site, 2008 or 2009, with an 81 review here at PU. Which is below average for my scoring. I didn't like that every model wasn't a perfect 10 and didn't like underarm hair on some of the models. I still don't like underarm hair but I just don't pay attention to it like I used to.
It was a different porn world back then. Eastern Europe ruled the porn world, perfect ten models, prissy, feminine models. They also had two of porn's greatest producers Denys DeFrancesco and Viv Thomas filming back then. In 2019, we have a bunch of models that are just like the last model and producers that think porn is 19 minutes and 56 seconds per scene with the same 5 positions highlighted, in order.
Girls Out West changes that. The main focuses of this site are solo models and lesbian scenes, there are male/female scenes but they're not that common in numbers compared to the other two:
Roughly 2,000 solo scenes, roughly 1,500 lesbian scenes, roughly 300-400 male/female scenes. Hopefully, you're adding that up to nearly 4,000 amateur scenes. They also have over 2,000 photo sets that are shot more in the style of Denys DeFrancesco (DDF) than current photographers. Including starting with a fully dressed model that giggles in some pictures, teases, then is fully nude.
There's personality here that you don't find in many sites these days. The more than 2 models, lesbian scenes have the feeling of, "What happened, she was naked and I got horny so I got naked and those two over there got horny and got naked then we all got together."
Besides the huge amount of exclusive content there's also the technical quality with some videos having 4K dating back a couple years, 1080p, 720p dating back more than a decade. That's rare for amateur sites.
I decided to try Girls Out West again when I saw a picture set, on a free TGP site, of a model named Rubi Valentine. She was cute, playful, sexy, exotic, natural. To my surprise, the watermark was Girls Out West. I joined in November 2018 and am still a member, another rarity for me to let a membership recur for 3 months. I can't help it. With that much back archive and daily updates, it seems like I'm just now seeing every model at least once and have downloaded over 100 models content from the site. That's another plus, the majority of the models have more than one video/photo set, some even have over 20. Besides my initial attraction to Rubi Valentine, once a member, I discovered Lulu. An incredibly cute model that has a "kind you don't take home to mother" side to her. Sorry for the Rick James reference. There's Bianca that could easily have been a top 3 model in the Eastern Euro boom of models.
There's also the frustration in myself for overlooking this site for over a decade. This is the closest I've seen to real, believable sex in porn in years. The Australian accents don't hurt, either. Neither does the kinky, frizzy hair that was made popular years ago. That, in and of itself, is exotic these days. Exotic to me is a look. It could be a darker complexion, it could be dark complexion with green eyes, it could be a hairstyle that's uncommon, an attitude or personality that's not phony (sorry Los Angeles) and Girls Out West does those types of models better than any site that I've joined over the last 5 years.
I won't give it a 100 simply because these models are not for everyone. Including me over a decade ago. I also haven't been a member long enough to say the site is a 100. That's probably my fault. I will say it's the first site I've felt constantly drawn to since joining, since the first time I joined Zishy. The blend of models, slim, heavier, darker complexion, pale complexion, freckles, it's all believable, real.
The amount of content: Close to 4,000 videos, 2,000+ photo sets, is unheard of in the amateur world unless it's one of those amateur sites that has a bunch of 18 second clips. There are interview videos that are fun to watch. The accents and personalities really shine in those. It takes me back to a time when porn was fun, models were shooting it for money but also because they loved having sex and losing inhibitions. There are exhibitionist, voyeuristic, scenes here too. I haven't noticed many implants or tattoos but considering these models come off as genuine, I'm not for sure those would bother most viewers.
It's rare that I let a site recur this long with intentions to go at least one more month. Besides the video quality that is hard to find in amateur porn, the newer photos are 6000x4000 resolution! It's even rarer that I feel bad about giving a 97. Give it a try, at least look at the previews. It has become one of my most recommended sites to others.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Unique and Spontaneous scenes
- Natural Girls
- Anal Licking
- Quick Downloads
- Good Previews
Cons:
- Needs work on models profiles with Annabel & Kara tagged films missing
- Lots of tattoos
- Some movies in splitted parts
- Site was a little slow on pages opening
Bottom Line:
I finally got around to joining this site after it has been on my list for quite a few years now, Im really glad I took the punt actually and certain scenes I discovered made me think wow, not see anything like that for quite some time, lots of the scenes felt really raw and spontaneous which I love, lots of lesbian sites these days you see scenes were its all staged and directed to the nines, you lose the passion and Im often left feeling underwhelmed with most of what I see. Gone are the glory days of Sapphic Erotica when euro girls got together and it felt like they were having fun and really wanted to explore each other. Few scenes have caught my attention over recent years to be honest but I do like lesbian porn and discovering some new gem.
Thankfully Girls Out West has lots of scenes and girls that I simply fell for on first sight. Models I especially took a fondness for were Celine who is an extremely slender and good looking blonde, she is very sexy and to watch her on Road Trip with Telo was an absolute joy, it was quite funny also as there was this guy in a parking lot by the beach where they were parked having sex with their boot open, he was just perving in the background, dunno if he was a hired actor or was a genuine guy lucky enough to see it happen in real life.
Another girl was Jessie, amazingly these two cuties did a couple of scenes together, Jessie has everything, she is an eleven out of ten, watching her is a real treat and she was into anal licking which quite a few of the scenes had thankfully.
Another girl who stood out for me was Charli, she was another stunning girl who had that shy cuteness but was really into sex, and these are the types of girls I love, innocent looking but wild tendencies. Charli is a great flirt too which I love, she says so much with her looks to her partner, very special girl and worth looking up if you do end up join.
My number 4 was (no particular order either) Charlot, she had a leg tattoo I think in one scenes but this must be new as didnt see it in all her movies. I guess its one thing when you join a site with natural and alternative girls like this and Abby Winters, you are going to see quite a few girls inked up. I look really for the ones untattooed or minor ones. Charlot though her face was so beautiful and she really had chemistry with the girls she shot with, some girls have a real aura about them and light up the screen, she did this, I couldnt take my eyes off her.
Lucianna is my fifth choice for girls not to miss if you join, she is a really beautiful girl and knows how to please a woman, she is great in many of her scenes and so hot I ended up getting her solo work too, that smile she has draws you in and you want to find more of her, my favorite scene with her was Hey Sweetie with Rose who is also gorgeous, very hot movie indeed.
Other mentions are Lily Rei, spotted her a while back on nubiles and she is amazing, so good to find her here, sadly she isnt in that many movies so didnt make my top 5, I also really liked the look of Georgia, she was a real classy looking lady, sadly she didnt have many lesbian scenes.
What really stood out for me here though, is the way they are filmed, they are filmed by women videographers and film crew, not that guys dont know what really is good lesbian erotica cause some do but the crew here do have a real gift for filming awesome hot and steamy lesbian sex from some fresh camera angles and I was left drooling with eyes goggled at some raw fueled sex.
I also have a massive thing for Aussie girls, I think it dates back to growing up with neighbours and home and away, their accents are a huge turn on. I would say I did prefer this to Abby Winters as I think the scenes that stood out will go into my hall of lesbian fame scenes directory. Abby Winters had some great scenes though so I do rate that site high too. Sometimes its a real breath of fresh air to join a site with natural girls who arent caked in makeup and dressed in porn star clothes, lots of the scenes are shot like a fly on the wall that you are lucky enough to of magically appeared on the wall witnessing the girl on girl feast before your very eyes.
Would I recommend this site, damn right I would, for me it seems much underrated and not a great load of reviews out there. Theres lots to go through, 14 years in fact, not all to my taste I grant you and some of the early stuff is in parts which can be annoying, they seem to of gone through lots of the older vids though and remastered them into one download which was a relief.
Other slight downside for me was lots of scenes are tagged as Annabel & Kara for example and these vids are not under the models profiles, so it was easily to miss scenes a favorite model may of done if shes been tagged like this, its an issue that needs fixing.
So I'm going to rate this a 92, I found it worth the money and glad I joined.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge Archive.
Genuine Amateurs.
Great Girl/Girl Scenes.
Awesome Videography.
Cons:
Same Faces over and over again.
Not enough Boy/Girl Videos.
Promise 7 Updates a week. But often they are only Behind The Scenes, old remastered Videos or Bonus Galleries from other sites.
So there are only 3-4 real Updates per Week, often different Part of the same Video.
Bottom Line:
Superb Site. Models are used too often and my feeling is they are struggling to get enough Models.
If you never tried it before its a must join.
If you, like me, are a member for a while now it makes sense to join every few month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Lots of amateur content
+ Different file types available
+ Tabbed navigation
+ Pictures: 1026, 1280, 1600 pixels long side, Some available @ 2000
+ In browser flash video
+ Bonus material from Yanks and ATK Hairy
Cons:
- File types are ridiculous to figure out
- File naming is another pain
- Split files in 2013?
- Minimal previews/ descriptions on videos
- Picture/video quality varies, often for the worse
- Site crashes while using Opera browser
- Not compatible with FreeDownloadManager
Bottom Line:
I'll preface this by saying that this will be, without a doubt, the most disjointed bottom line I've ever written. I'm just going to call it, "Issues". Joining this site was a major disappointment and what follows might tell the story.
I will say that the speed issue I commented on was somewhat resolved. I still can't use FreeDownloadManager, but the "Save As" speed is up to 1.2 mb. Not great, but certainly better than the 200kb I saw in the beginning. Other than this being a strictly amateur site which I absolutely love, that pretty much ends the positives. Here we go...
Normally, I would go into detail about the various file types. GOW seems to go out of their way to make that confusing as hell. You get columns labeled mp4, mpg+wmv and wmv. Then, quite often, you face a cryptic list like this: Source MP4 1080p, Source MP4 720p, High (1024x576 @ 3200k), High (1024x576 @ 3200k), HD (1280x720 @ 4700k), HD (1280x720 @ 4700k), Low (512x288 @ 600K), Low (512x288 @ 600K). On top of that, there are sometimes 5 links that say the same exact thing (e.g. Medium (1920x1080 @ 1500K)) Seemingly duplicate links that link to different files? Same file with slightly different names? I have no clue. I'll just leave it as this - I tried to download only the highest resolution video and was frequently disappointed in the quality of even the newest scenes. Lighting quality, especially on the outdoor scenes was hit or miss.
File naming. Fine on pictures as the name of the model and the set are used. On video? Another nightmare. A lot of the B/G and G/G videos download using the couple's names with no mention of the scene/episode. So, even though a couple has done more than one video, each one has to be renamed so you can download the different videos.
Opened a solo girl video that showed it was the second of 3 parts. Went to the model index to get the other two parts and there were only two videos listed. WHERE'S THE THIRD? Guess I can browse the entire site to see if it's there.
Clicked on the thumbnail for part 3 of a video and the flash preview shows part 2
Picture sets showing up in the video section.
Thinking there might be a browser issue in how the site was displayed, I tried Opera. That kept crashing so I went back to Firefox.
It's pretty bad when the bonus sets are better quality than most of the host site's material - higher resolution and better lighting.
Preview thumbnails for several full length videos open to a page with no download links.
*********************
I actually got a headache trying to figure out how to write all of this, so I'm going to stop writing and just leave it at this - For such a well known site, it's a mess. If you really like amateurs, in all their non-glamorous glory, and don't mind digging for files and renaming almost every video, go for it. Otherwise, avoid this site.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Decent amount of content, there's plenty here to keep you busy for a long time.
Clearly amateur-ish. "Amateur" is such a subjective term, but the girls and guys here are clearly not professionals, thought hey are certainly not virgins to porn after their first shoot.
More natural women, less make-up and porn-like qualities.
Cons:
Video quality is relative to whatever they shot it with. I'm not sure they aren't using Super * in some cases, the quality is that bad.
Amateur porn, you get what you expect, amateur quality.
Selection of content is all pretty much the same. Apparently Aussies aren't into exciting or passionate sex. The lesbian sex here is really just masturbation with a little kissing. Tame by reality standards.
Bottom Line:
This site wants to e Abby Winters so badly they think they can just coast off that business model. Unfortunately they fail in this regard, and realistically, if their is any real talent they tend to wind up at Abby Winters anyway. Not that these are the only two Aussie sites, but they do seem to be closely linked in terms of style, content, and even models.
You're better off spending the extra money at Abby Winters. You will get about the same amount in terms of diversity, maybe a little less m/f than GOW, but the quality of GOW m/f hardcore, if you can call it that, was so lame you're better off without it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Mostly good quality videos
Fairly well polished site
Good variety, nice mix of girl/girl and boy girl
Girl/girl stuff is genuine! Have joined some sites where its faked - it's all good on Girls out west
Cons:
The major problem is that most of the girls are either fat or unnatractive. This is a major issue for me. Most other sites have stunning girls, there's no excuse for all these fat women.
Some of the videos are in several parts
Bottom Line:
A good quality site, with good quality videos. However, there are only a few videos that really did anything for me, due to a lot of the videos containing unnatractive or fat girls.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good filtering options
- Bio details for each model
- Active forum
- Interesting and varied locations
- Natural, charming girls
- Good range of ages, body types
- Plenty of unshaved models
- Great quality videos
- Good download speeds on huge files
Cons:
- Site is a bit dated, in looks and operation
- G/G and G/B are separate 'models'
- Some inconsistency in video formats
- Only recent 1080 videos streamable/previewable
- Pics have one resolution, basic slideshow
- Some picture sets too large
- Poor preview area
Bottom Line:
I'm usually into the slightly more glam side of things, but for some reason had a hankering for some amateur, real-girl type material, and perhaps just a little G/B - hardcore isn't really my thing, but occasionally I enjoy it. Having seen clips from both Girls out West and Abby Winters, it was a close call - but I opted for the former, it seems a little more raunchy and one price gets you everything here, as opposed to the different site areas at AW. I suspect the material is similar - and reading some of the comments, it looks like some models defected to GOW after AW moved production from Australia - but either way I'm not disappointed with my choice.
There is a huge amount of material here - the preview area is sadly very basic and doesn't really do justice to the site. Near-daily updates going back to 2004 results in around 1400 videos and 1200 picture sets from about 600 models/pairs; and very roughly I'd say a 40/40/20 spit between Solo/GG/GB. The site is a bit retro-looking, and could do with a facelift; but is still easy to navigate and with good filtering options. There are separate lists of updates for videos and pictures; videos can be further split into Solo/GG/GB material. Models can be browsed by name or recency; and filtered by various options such as figure/broad age range/ethnicity/level of action/hair colour.
Once you open a model's page, we have the standard list of sets and videos; usually with bio details, and a mini-interview which is generally fun to read. One minor quibble is that GG and GB material is treated as a separate model - eg Evie is one model, then Evie & Kara another... so when looking at Kara's solo material there's no obvious link back to some of her GG material. Most models are in the 18-30 age range, with a few older; and have various looks/body types but all are real, natural girls - many unshaved, which is my preference - and mostly Australian, with a few US/European girls too.
The videos are probably the main draw here. The more recent ones, from the last two years or so, are in 1080; then 720 & DVD for the two years before that, and smaller going back to 2004. And there's some really great material - the videos range from interviews and behind-the-scenes, to stripping, dancing, toy play, and hardcore action, and are pin sharp with good direction and camerawork. Sometimes there's a premise or plot; suitably daft, but it just makes things more fun. The locations are varied and interesting; some in models' own (I guess?) rooms and places; and quite a lot outdoor - some in the great outdoors, others in risqu public places and abandoned urban buildings. Most feature the models talking; either chatting, talking dirty, or playing out the scenario - these are real girls and it makes the videos a lot more fun and interesting to hear them and let their personality show through.
It's worth noting that most video come in anywhere between 2 and 7 parts, but that's not really an issue; each part is a good 10-15 minutes long and good in it's own right; they've recently started adding combined videos at the end for those of us that don't mind downloading a massive 3-4gb video lasting an hour or so.
There are almost as many picture sets too; although strangely - since I generally prefer pics to videos - they didn't work quite as well for me. Many of them seemed a little too posed, the models a little-self conscious; the natural, easygoing charm and personality of the girls is the star of this site and for me, it shows bettter in the videos than the pictures. I also found some of the sets a bit too gynaecological, and some too large - a gallery of 150 or 200+ pictures really needs editing down, I think. Still, these are quite personal opinions and despite them, I still found plenty of sets I liked.
The picture setup is fairly basic, recent pics are 2K, and opening a gallery takes you to a simple slideshow where you can download the zip or click on a thumbnail to take you to the full-size image - fine for me, but some folk prefer different resolutions.
Overall this is a great site, with a huge amount of fun, original, raunchy material featuring really lovely girls; they may be amateur but the quality of the work is anything but. I've got a lot of great material and I'll probably go back to something more glam next - and I may try AW sometime - but suspect I'll be back here.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
* Lots of high-quality content
* Unique, natural-style content (no well-known "worn-out" porn stars)
Cons:
* Compared to the past the site lacks some "fresh" and creative ideas
* Since the site has received very good ratings on lots of review sites it seems that it is not as much working on improving its content any more
Bottom Line:
The site has lots of content for those who like young and natural girls. I can recommend the site to all those who have never subscribed to it before. If you like "glossy", "porn-star" porn "penthouse"-style you should turn to another site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Real dudes fucking real girls! I love to see non-porn stars fucking and this is what they give.
- Real orgasms
- Real-life girls
- Local stuff. I'm Australian and want to see Australian porn!
Cons:
- Some of the girls are a bit scummy, but hey, some people might like that.
- Slow download speeds, not as fast as it should be.
- Updates aren't as often as I'd like.
- Forum is a bit boring, not as much interaction from the staff as I would enjoy.
Bottom Line:
This site and Abby Winters are the best around. I wish there was more like it! Just a couple of horny girls having fun and no porn stars!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Newer vids and pics
Cons:
Older vids and pics
Trashy settings.
Photo sets too large
Dirty underwear on some
some girls need to take a shower before the shoot, gross!
Unnecessarily long videos
Bottom Line:
Once you get past the con's, there are some pretty girls in fetching positions. Other than that, it's not worth the money.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Video and photograph in which it took a picture of a lot of amateur women
Search engine with a lot of choices
Update at nearly every day
The overall lovely design
Openhearted forum space
Cons:
There are a lot of photographs and videos that do not contain sex.
The video of B/G is not an enough number.
Divided video
Bottom Line:
I like G/G video. I love B/G than them.
The B/G video of the amount for which I hope doesn't exist here.
However, I should have expected it because I saw the tour and the review.
In this site, there are women who did a lot of Pierce.
And, there are women who did a lot of tattoos.
I do not like it.
I did not download videos of women who did Pierce to genitals and women who had done a lot of Pierce to her face.
I came to like Kim's B/G video a little.
The Kim is a really usual amateur woman.
She sits on the motorcycle, and is caressed by a man.
She seems to want a man to kiss.
And, she says to a man, "Kiss me".
She is lovely.
It was able to be seen in not only the video but also the photograph.
The G/G video of Page and Rochelle is hot.
Page is very sensitive.
She shakes oneself twitching only by a little being touched.
Her orgasm can be seen.
It is regrettable that there is only one kind of G/G video of her.
I was a member of G/G in abbywinters before.
I think that it is a good site.
I think that becoming a member on this site after you enjoy abbywinters is a good idea.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Uniquely natural / real models (average women).
- Natural settings without glossy editing.
- Genuine amateurs (not even pro-am!)
Cons:
- Little or no chemistry or sexual excitement in most videos.
- Most videos are older, and have very poor resolution.
- Often (not always) very jerky camera work. Makes me seasick!
- Many videos have low contrast, no real blacks, so are like watching through a steamy window.
Bottom Line:
I was intrigued by the Annie's truly unique approach and values, as I understood them from the reviews here and from looking at the site as a non-member. I definitely appreciate porn done by women with real female arousal -- at least I think I do (need more cases now). I watched the 4 trailers for boy/girl videos, and they seemed promising. The site says 500 videos -- so I figured there must be at least 100 b/g videos. So I joined hoping for some b/g videos with real arousal, female orgasms, and other things that I like (see my profile, and the forum "Against the grain").
Unfortunately, I have to agree with PU reviewer ramscrota. As a whole, the b/g videos offered by this site are pathetic.
First, quantity and resolution. Only 24 are listed, 2 of which are mis-indexed (they have no boys). Half of these, 13, are available only in very low resolution, highly compressed blurry 480 x 360 pixels mpg. Later vids move up to 640 x 360 wmv, then more recentlhy 770 x 435 mp4 or wmv without the blurring compression.
Worst of all, in most of the b/g videos, the couple seems to be working for the camera woman, trying hard (sometimes difficulty with erection) without being very horny or aroused. Sometimes they are clearly too hot, sweaty, and uncomfortable, and in some outdoor scenes the flies are quite distracting/disgusting.
So, after looking at all of the b/g scenes and finding very little, I looked at some of the g/g or solo videos. Since I find genuine arousal exciting, I looked mostly at the ones where the description indicated an orgasm. Again, most of these were simply unexciting. Natural down to earth people, just not very expressive or excited people.
As others have said, the models are a cross section of body types, ages, and personalities -- but all presented in very natural form, little or no makeup. I like that approach, but not the results here. Also one of the two camera women is often crossing the viewport, or her shadow, which I found realistic but somewhat distracting.
Overall, I have to say that for me, joining this site was a waste of money.
All that said, I did find a few vids that I downloaded and didn't erase after one viewing. Larissa's Manhunt is hilarious and she is really entertaining and sexy. Unfortunately, the 4 segments end without any sex or orgasms. (I deleted those.) The following b/g videos had some real sexual energy, excitement, and orgasms:
- Jasmine & Lee, Caravan Sex
- Timbo fucks Kim (silly overacting, but real multiple orgasms)
- Samantha and Maxwell was a really tender, affectionate, and hot video.
- Vince and Miah were fun.
After watching a couple of dozen solo and g/g videos (generally not my thing) the only one I am keeping is
- Daisy Duke & Alma (real horny excitement and energy and orgasms)
All of the above except Timbo were available in reasonable resolution.
Honorable mention goes to Kim's motorcycle video (3 parts). No orgasms but an amazing concept, pretty well done.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Real looking amateurs
- Generally a good sense of the erotic
- Being an Austraian, it is exciting seeing the shoots in some locations known to me.
- Great sense of fun on the site. Forum is one of the most enjoyable I've ever seen.
Cons:
- Little HC sex. The BG scenes are pathetic.
- Pic sets are often far too long
- Many sets look chaotic and disorganized
- Many sets photographed or videoed in untidy, dingy surroundings. Annie needs to get a cleaner in, and put some attractive decor around her place.
Bottom Line:
A good site for those who love pics, and a sense of fun (the forum is great!). But this site is a lot like Australian society and culture - some good things, but messy, chaotic and unplanned.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that offers very realistic lesbian sex
- Not for sure, but I had never seen these models. If I have, I didn't recognize them, so it definitely brings new amateur models
- Navigation is good, which is important since I don't know these models and had to sift through them to find the ones that interested me
- Movie quality is good enough at 640 high end, 2000 bitrate
- Pictures are high resolution and zipped, though see the cons
Cons:
- To be blunt, there are more than a few not attractive models here. Will explain in Bottom Line
- I didn't get very good DL speeds, though it wasn't terrible about 100 kb/s lower than what I'm used to getting
- Sorry to those who like hairy women, it is a con to me, some of these girls look like they have Sasquatch in a leg headlock, major turn-off for me, but if you like that this is a pro
- Most of the picture sets didn't interest me, so having the high res, zips, wasn't really a factor. Relax, I'm going to explain in the BL
- Price seemed a little high at $25
Bottom Line:
My annual "lets try a real amateur site" attempt. Ok, if you like only real amateurs this is a very good site. If you like hairy women, this is a good site. If you like glamour girls, this is not a good site.
I won't knock the quality since it is very good, navigation is very good and you can tell that a lot of hard work is put into this site.
On the good news, some of these girls are beautiful. You get a nice blend of body shapes and sizes and I really liked that about the site. The sex, whether b/g or g/g is very believable and let me repeat, there are some very pretty girls here. Especially if you like redheads, which I do.
Then there is the bad side. Some of these girls are unshaven. I'm not a shaven beaver freak, my favorite model is Eve Angel and she almost always has pubic hair.
Some of these girls are not very good looking either, not in an ugly way, but it is like some of them just rolled out of bed, no make-up, flat hair types. Let me put it this way, some of these women in my guess are real lesbians, not the lipstick kind either.
Having said that, that is just my preferences showing. I can applaud this site for staying true to their niche and if you are into very regular girls blended with the occasional knockout, you will like this site better than I did. Quality is fine all around too. Just not my cup of tea overall. So, I will recommend it for those who like the unshaven natural types, real lesbian fans, but can't recommend it for glam fans.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Others have given all the details (quality, regularity of updates and navigation etc. etc.) regarding this site, so allow me to generalize and simply state, or shout: This is without a doubt the best amateur site I have come across so far.
Instead of a bevy of aspiring porn stars (read clones) here be found real women! Arghh!
There are the skinny, the chubby, the shaved, the hairy, the teens and the mature. There are teeth that aren't capped, pimples that aren't hidden under layers of make-up, hair that's not always perfect, instead there's simply a bunch of models who are for the most part unabashed exhibitionists, cheered on by photographers (female) who don't give a hoot if they end up in the picture now and then, by accident or design.
I think the web mistress defiantly proclaims through every set and video: take us or leave us!
Well, I gladly take it! The site is one of the few that's true to its niche, yet the pictures and videos are of good to excellent quality.
Cons:
I really can't find any cons, except for the usual one: that some of the older material is obviously not as high quality as the newer stuff.
Bottom Line:
Summing up: this is my second subscription to this site. I was so delighted with it first time around that I put down money for a three month subscription this time. (Billing through CCBill, another plus)
After reading tons of reviews from my fellow PU members I must warn those who express disappointment in connection with other sites because they always find some models that fall short of their ideal, that this might not be the perfect site for them.
However, for those who long for natural rather than "porn queen pretty", this could easily become their second home.
I know that I find ALL of the girls gorgeous because they almost manage to convince an old cynic that they are not just posing for money.
They ARE the girls/women next door who like to be naughty now and then. Three cheers for our friends from Oz for running a great site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
#all female run site
#1250 X 834 pixels hi rez photos for recent updates except 2004 (does not make up a big part of the site)
#most updates are 175-300 pics long: thus every desired pose is covered
# pics are absolutely stunning
#all movies are mpeg 1 movies
#forums allow for some raunchiness that the average forums would never allow.
# average mpeg length is 7-12 minutes long
# most models are 18-24 but also sexy models in their late 20' and early 30's
#19.50 recurring/ per month
Cons:
#old pics are 1000 X 659 (2004)
#all movies are mpeg1 movies
#have to right click on videos and designate "save target as" in order to save it to the hard drive. This was the only way I got to see the full video.
# navigation contains a lot of pages to scroll through to get to models and vids (though I could use categories under extras on main page to search models via category)
Bottom Line:
Bottom line, A lot is offered for only $19.50 per month; After being a member of one month, and reviewing the site. This is a site I'm going to rebill
#all female run site: Annie and Dandy
Annie is #hot# herself and SHE SHOOTS absolutely
Bad #ss photosets.
#Annie calls herself -your web mistress, and "Your Captain Speaking" is the quote under her current avatar in the forum. Annie is a hottie herself. Right now the avatar is a pic of her blue panties pulled halfway down her sexy legs.
#### for those who like forums participation; this one may be a funnest forums to participate in. This forum is indeed directed by Annie, yet raunch and rudeness seems to be the style here.
####Let me explain the main page links: girls, girls/girls, girl/boys (this is not a big section), stories, annie, forums, extras, join
####Ok instead of trying to explain what is offered I took a calculator and added all the numbers up:
####SOFTCORE:242 SOLO MODEL photo sets at 13,831 PICS RATED SOFTCORE; 12 GIRL/GIRL Photo SETS, AT 2,470 PICS; 11 girl/girl videos RATED SOFTCORE, and 34 solo girl SOFTCORE VIDEOS#### Medium Core: 107 SOLO MODELS, 31,853 PICS RATED MEDIUM WITH 97 medium core solo girl vids and 24 medium core Girl/Girl videos; 12 GIRL/GIRL photosets AT 3,099 PICS RATED MEDIUM,;#######HARDCORE:25 GIRL/GIRL sets AT 7,828 PICS RATED HARDCORE; 93 hardcore GIRLS sets AT 26,934 PICS; and 184 solo girl hardcore vids, and 101 hardcore girl/girl vids
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
As raw as it can get
Many of the Aussie other adult site members have gravitated here
seems to be no censorship on the forums - say what you like
Annie/Dandy - they run the place - no rules
Good price
Taking aw models and giving them b/g shoots
Cons:
Limited videos
Much of the videos are broken up into segements. So you have to wait weeks to get full story.
Please, please give us full download
video quality not always the greatest
Bottom Line:
An interesting site with sexy models. Videos too infrequent and would like to see better quality vids.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The site has a lot of content on it with a lot of pretty women. One thing that I do like is that these are 'real' girls and not pornstars. Real breasts and pubic hair are very much present. The videos aren't slick, but they are fun. This site is like watching real people get naked, real people have sex, etc.
One thing that really is nice is that in all my looking (and I'm not done) I haven't seen one facial. I'm finding facials increasingly lame and their absence is nice.
Cons:
I'd be happier if there was a bit more boy/girl content.
While I like natural, 'regular' girls on a site, some of the girls aren't even remotely attractive.
The videos are not slick and are almost crude in their style. Very much an amateur production. For me, this is good, but it may be a turn off to many.
Bottom Line:
This site is Abby Winters less beautiful sister. She's pretty and a lot of fun but not as beautiful as her sister Abby. Whereas Abby Winters site is slick and very polished, Girls Out West is much more of an amateur site.
However, I found this to be endearing. I think Abby's is a great site, one of the best, but it almost takes itself too seriously. GOW is just a lot of fun, pretty, naked, natural average girls. I like it a lot.
I'm almost a hypocrite in saying this. I do like porn---but sometimes I get tired of the slickness, the fake breasts, the fake moaning, shaved pussies, and facials.
This site is sort of the anti-porn site. No silicon, lots of pubic hair, no facials, cum shots that actually take place where they usually take place. If you love slick porn and love facials and love seeing porn stars in action, this may not be the site for you. If you want to see pretty but regular girls doing what they do, this is a really good site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Consider this site a poor relative of Abby Winters. Some of the great looking girls found on Abby Winters are also featured here. The site features both photos and movies which are updated on a regular basis.
Cost for a month membership is reasonable a reasonable $20.
Cons:
Photo quality is mediocre by todays standards
Video quality is mediocre by todays standards
Many of the girls are unattractive.
Bottom Line:
If you like Abby Winters, this site might be worth checking out to see more of the same girls in a different setting. However, be warned many of the girls are not as attractive as those found on Abby Winters. In addition, you might be disappointed at the mediocre photo and video quality. However, for $20 I think it is worth a shot because there are some real gems here.
Follow-Up:
I rejoined the site recently and was disappointed to find no real improvements to note. Video is still noticeably inferior by todays standards and most of the girls would still never make it on Abby Winters. One of the more popular recurring models from Abby (Paula) appears in some videos packing on quite a bit of extra baggage in the rear and thighs. I'm leaning towards giving this site a thumbs down recommendation for membership.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
