Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: messmer (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (2582)  |   Threads Started (156)

1701-1750 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 22 27 34 Page 35 36 39 42 45 51 52 Next Page >

06-02-10  03:43pm - 5317 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


Hey messmer, The newest vids are 1280 x 720/4.8 Mbps. I don't know exactly what percentage are HD but at a glance it looks like at least half the videos I downloaded and kept are HD. The others are 854 x 480/2 Mbps -- not bad.

As for the quality of the action in the videos I am satisfied. I found some really good hardcore but I think my favorite is actually a masturbation video with a model named Kasey.


Thanks, Goldfish. There might just be a renewed subscription to ATK Natural and Hairy coming up. Their movies were really atrocious in quality last time I was a member!

06-02-10  11:42am - 5318 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Look what happened with Max Hardcore and now Evil Angel. You'd would think after the horror of 9/11 the leaders of the 'greatest country on earth' might have bigger legal priorities than wasting time in the perpetual gray area of defining 'obscenity'.

But, yes, we are now diverting our attention to financial institution bailouts and fucking up the environment--in other words, business as usual.


I hadn't heard about Evil Angel. What happened?

06-02-10  11:22am - 5318 days #61
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


One of my main life philosphy is to try to always be nice even when people aren't nice. It's not always easy and sometime it's downright hard but at the end of the day. The fact that I was nice throught my day makes me feel good and I also don't agonize about a certain situation where I think I might have said or done the wrong thing to someone.

Another reason is that I've found that when I'm nice to people that aren't necessarily nice. It annoys them and drives them nuts and that makes me feel good. It's bad of me but those people only have to change their attitude and they won't find me annoying....Well at least less annoying.


Ah, that's the true Canadian way, Pat. We like passive-aggressive! Someone (Jesus?) talked about that a couple of thousand years ago when he said: Be kind to your enemies and you'll heap burning coals on their heads, or something to that effect.

06-02-10  11:15am - 5318 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I never knew that Australia was so puritanical. What a shame that AW has to move. They were my very first pay site and are indirectly responsible for my being here at PU.

Good Heavens, if a so-called enlightened Western Country like Oz can contemplate "internet filters," then I think we best all start holding on to our stash of porn because Canada and the U.S. are sure to follow their example.

And I wouldn't even have called AW a porn site. Compared to most they are beautiful but very soft! Get yourself a new government quickly, my beloved Aussies, you are supposed to have a rebellious streak in your genes passed down to you by your unwilling emigre forefathers from England so kick the prudes out! Edited on Jun 16, 2010, 11:03am

05-31-10  06:26pm - 5319 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Noooooo!!! They were an excellent site and seemed to be run by people who understood customer service. Maybe that's why they couldn't compete in the sleazy world of online porn.

One thing I always liked about them was that they didn't carry just the same stuff the other DVD sites have. Sure, there was overlap, but not as much as you'd expect.

This is terrible news!


They were a quality site and I gave them one of the highest ratings I ever gave to a DVD site in a review because of their excellent niche material and the friendliness of their webmaster, Reg.

But I must say that I saw it coming, because the updates lately were pretty lame stuff, which was highly unusual for them and I had a suspicion they were getting it from the bottom of the barrel because they were financially stressed.

As a matter of fact I kicked myself for taking out a yearly subscription with the hopes of getting stuff that's not normally found on other sites and then seeing DVDs that were no better than those found at DVD Box or Videosz. I don't want to knock these sites but all that meat and no potatoes seems tiresome when compared to American Vice in its glory days.

05-31-10  01:51pm - 5319 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


This is the first time that this has happened to me in the many years of downloading porn: I can&#65533;t find any sites that I want to join. It isn&#65533;t time for me to join Video Box again yet (with some recent changes and a reduction in anal themed movies a membership there is only worthwhile once a year). It isn&#65533;t time to join American Vice again either. They are very high quality but only update once a year. I&#65533;ve been through several public nudity sites recently and many of those don&#65533;t update regularly so there is no reason to go back this soon. I spent some time at FTV Girls and looked at a lot of that. (A very impressive site.) Same with ALS Scan and ALS Angels. I&#65533;m not big into sites like these but I really liked these and recognize the effort that goes into them. I&#65533;ve had recent memberships to several of my favorite Kink.com websites so there aren&#65533;t yet enough updates to justify going back just yet. I even tried some strange sites like Ass Smoothie and Swirly Girls to see what they were like.

So here I sit with no active memberships. This is very unusual. Does anyone have any suggestions that they can make? I like DVD sites like Video Box and American Vice but I find that many of them obviously share the same material. I say I don&#65533;t like solo / softcore stuff, but every time I get a membership to a site like ALS Angels, ALS Scan or FTV Girls I really like it, so maybe I&#65533;m just denying it to myself. (And I still think that Brooke Skye was the best looking girl on the internet when here site was live and updating&#65533 I had a membership to Nubiles maybe five years ago and that was good. There was a bit of hardcore on there and according to reviews there is more now. Having an anal and ass fixation might make a membership at Ass Traffic a good bet since I haven&#65533;t had one in over five years, but I prefer U.S. porn. That isn&#65533;t being anti-European, it&#65533;s just that I like to be able to locate more material of a girl I like and sometimes that&#65533;s hard with European sites who change the names of the models.

Yes, I know that this is a highly personalized choice, but does anyone have any suggestions? Please help! VISA will call soon and ask if I died or found religion.


I don't have any suggestions but have to inform you that American Vice shut down about a week ago! They were decent enough to send all their members an email promising a refund later on.

05-31-10  07:53am - 5320 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


Does the site have to be solely girls on top? as someone already mentioned many sites specializing in hardcore sex usually have the girl on top for at least a portion of the scene. I'm a member of Reality Kings right now and see plenty of it. I was also a member at ATK Petites recently and many of the hardcore scenes had the woman on top for a portion of the clip.

I guess if you're looking for a site where the woman is on top from start to end in every movie no, I haven't seen that.


How are the ATK movies these days, quality wise, goldfish?

05-31-10  07:50am - 5320 days #164
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I didn't mention Overseas sales because I couldn't find any data on it. I suspect that Oversea sales are larger than North American ones simply because there is more population. Mind you if a movie does poorly in NA than it's also likely to do poorly Overseas and you have to deduct the cost of translation into other languages when you send movies Overseas.

I think Oversea sales are the reasons why some sequels get done because ther hav3 been a few movies that didn't do very well here but somehow got green lit for a sequel.


Try Box Office Mojo for really detailed information on any movie. They usually got everything from production cost to listing of a movie's daily,weekly,monthly take. Plus on how many screens it is playing etc. etc. Also a list of the all time biggest money makers (today's data and data adjusted for inflation). Good source if you are a movie buff.

05-30-10  03:29pm - 5320 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I think you meant women-on-top sites. I didn't even realize that the thread title was ambiguous when I first read it as "Are there good women on the top (highest rated) sites?"


That's how I read it too, at first!

05-30-10  03:28pm - 5320 days #54
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Hubertusius:


Wow just watched almost all of the bound heat clips. Are the movies as good as the clips? Are they real movies??


And has Deutschland really become deutchland? Just kidding, we all like to guard our privacy!

05-30-10  03:24pm - 5320 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
In the DVD sites I frequent there's hardly a scene that does not contain a model in the cowgirl or reverse cowgirl position. Of course, along with that you also get doggy, missionary, bj, anal, facial in the same scene!

If you are looking for a site that caters exclusively to your niche I doubt if you will find one, though!

05-30-10  03:12pm - 5320 days #162
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Actually, I recently read an article that said in the movie business, the main source of profits, in descending order, was:
1. sales to TV (including cable)
2. DVD sales
3. box office

Box office is supposed to be a tiny profit or break-even business. There's even a saying in Hollywood that the theatrical release is a trailer for the DVD and TV sales.

So unless you are in the business, or read an article about the way it really works, you wouldn't have the foggiest idea of the business side of movie making.


I have the feeling that article was right. Cable carries a lot of movies that no one has ever heard of. A lot of them are stinkers but it must be profitable to produce them or we wouldn't see so many of them.

05-30-10  02:40pm - 5320 days #160
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I agree with you but your assumption is that the people responsible for making movies have to be inteligent. I'm affraid that isn't always the case. Macgruber was made by Universal and this is not a very good year for Universal.
Here are the box office takes versus production cost.

Leap Year: 25 millions vs 19 millions
The wolfman: 61.9 millions vs 150 millions
Green zone: 35 millions vs 100 millions
Repo Men: 13.8 millions VS 32 millions
Robin Hood: 82 millions vs 200 millions
MacGruber: 6.9 millions vs 10 millions

None of these movies have made a profit but Leap Year and MacGruber still win because they didn't lose as much as the others. I looked at the upcoming stuff and Universal is going to be in serious trouble by the end of 2010.

Here are the upcoming Universal releases for 2010:

Get him to the Greek: will bomb.
Despicable Me: animated movie which should do well.
Charlie St Cloud: stars Zac Effron likely to bomb
Scott Pilgfrim vs the World: should do well.
Nanny Mcphee returns: should do well.
The adjustement bureau: likely to bomb
My Soul to Take: likely to bomb.
Little Fockers: likely to bomb.


Don't forget that many of the movies you quoted have a world wide release as well. Robin Hood, for instance, despite the fact that it is doing poorly in North America is doing quite well world-wide with an overseas take (Saturday, May 29) of $154,600,000 or 65.1% of the total take. (Box Office Mojo). So that one should recover its costs. Will it make a profit? With the huge promotional costs involved only time will tell.

05-30-10  02:28pm - 5320 days #18
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


I'll cast my vote for condoms being a turn-off. I can't really explain why, but they seem to drop the heat level of a scene for me.


For me, in real life, stopping to put on a condom always changed sex from a spontaneous act to something that was pre-arranged. Of course, being monogamous made the whole procedure unnecessary.

It is possible that this attitude influences me when I watch porn. I know that everyone in the business should use a condom but it does drop the heat level for me as well.

05-30-10  02:11pm - 5320 days #32
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by malikstarks:


You make a good point, there certainly are not enough of these women to 'flood the industry'(at least not yet). However there are far more enough to fill up a few networks with constant updates. A great deal of them would come from the swinging community, which makes up a good portion of the models on 50plusmilfs.com.

Also there are tons of these types of models on other more soft core sites like Southern Charms, which has hundreds of models. (and most of the models on SC do hardcore videos as well for a separate purchase).

Part of it may be a matter of logistics, certainly there are more than enough models willing to do this type of thing, but they are spread out across the country (like the southern charms models). The models for instance from 50plusmilfs mostly come from Florida where The Score Group is based.

Still I have no doubt that it could be done. I'm certain there is a market for it, and that's usually all that is needed.


My dream: a site like Southern Charms except that you don't have to subscribe to each individual model but rather get about thirty or more regular models with steady updates and ZIPPED picture sets! They've had some hot amateurs over the years and I find most a lot more appealing than the pro-ams. They also seem to be more aware of the fine art of a good tease than most mature sites out there!

And thanks for the tip re. 50plusmilfs, I must have another look to study some of the swingers more closely!

05-30-10  01:59pm - 5320 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I would argue that none of us actually watch true lesbian porn, but more accurately girl-girl porn. I would bet many lesbians would not be as interested or as turned on as we are by the 'lesbian' porn we enjoy, given that it's made by guys for guys with bisexual or very open-minded heterosexual women as the actresses. I remember watching a little bit of lesbian porn (it was specifically made for lesbians by a lesbian cast and crew) and thinking something like "This is boring! When are they going to start really going at it? And what's with all the kissing?" Clearly I was not part of the target audience.

I think the girl-girl/'lesbian' material we guys like is not really homosexual and that's why most guys are comfortable watching it. We view it as just another porn video because we are ogling the opposite sex, if only a few more of them in the same place at the same time--convenient! Add in the factor that you have seen some of the actresses in guy-girl videos as well and you realize it's just horny guy fantasy material, not exactly what any lesbian would care to see.


I cannot disagree with your observations, turboshaft. Real lesbian sites and material are exceedingly rare and, chances are, they would not appeal to us half as much as two female porn stars doing a bit of pretending in a video.

That's why I hate "lesbian" material in softcore picture sites because it is, in most cases, entirely too obvious that the two or more ladies involved in the shoot aren't really into it but just going through the motions.

Pornstars in videos are much more convincing, but they're pros .. they learned to pretend convincingly that they love EVERYTHING!

05-29-10  04:14pm - 5321 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


There are some things that we've never discussed here, such as how clouds are formed, but that doesn't mean that we're nephophobic (afraid of clouds).

I'm not gay, so why should I even care? I hope that doesn't offend anyone.

And people who like gay porn have done absolutely nothing that I've ever seen to accommodate our interest in heterosexual porn.

Fact is, I've never even thought about that before. But the more I think about it, the more I know that I'm completely untroubled by this realization.


A good way to look at the whole subject, Drooler!

05-29-10  02:42pm - 5321 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I don't consider myself to be homophobic but I won't join a site that has 2 guys kissing and fucking. I have nothing agsinst it but it won't do anything for me except make me feel uncomfortable. I won't watch Brokeback Mountain for that same reason. I would join a site that has transexuals with girls but not transexuals with guys. I'm not going to get into an argument of what a transexual really is because it's not relevant since I consider them to be a man with breast.

I invite anyone to join this site and offer a review of which ever site they enjoy. I think the more the merrier.


Strange how two people can look at the subject so differently, Pat. I have always looked at Trannies as girls by nature, who knew from a very early age that they were in a man's body by mistake but who haven't quite taken that final step yet, so I have no problems seeing them with a man. My problem is when this "girl" is made to fuck the guy, then it becomes unnatural for me. As to the rest of your remarks, I completely agree with you about the "discomfort" factor when it comes to gay material (excluding Lesbians). However I will join the others and say reviews of gay sites or participation by more gays in this forum would certainly not be frowned upon by anyone here. Everyone welcome!

05-25-10  06:38pm - 5325 days #26
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


So, all the reasons articulated above in this thread are really no more grounded than simply saying "It just ain't right ... now squeal like a pig."

My point is that you aren't being "human" if getting your rocks off on some beast that really can't consent and is just along for the ride isn't being real civilized and that's the point. A bunch of internetless sheep herders from 200 years ago might be tempted but aren't we a bit better than that today? When societies concepts shift from "things we can conquer and use to our advantage" to "what things should we be preserving instead of exploiting" I think you have to raise the bar higher.


The thought of getting "my rocks off on some beast" repulses me and I certainly agree with you that it isn't civilized, witty and that we should be above that. Or in your words: that we should set the bar higher. It's my feeling that if we don't WE abuse OUR humanity.

But to ascribe to animals the capacity to feel abused or humiliated or even to suspect them of being capable of the notion that: "Hey, I didn't consent to this," is an attempt to see things through their eyes which is anthropomorphism.

Animals may be and are being exploited on a daily basis at slaughter houses for our eating pleasure but I don't think exploitation on a sexual level is possible. The awareness of right or wrong is missing. Chances are they would give the action no more thought than a fleshlight would.

05-25-10  03:35pm - 5325 days #32
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


They'd probably wind up sounding too much like Henry Miller, and then I'd get accused of just being a wannabe.


Ah, Henry Miller, he's one of the authors who sent an impressionable young mind down the wrong garden path (thanks, Henry.)

Many a happy hour was spent with his books!

05-25-10  03:29pm - 5325 days #21
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by justme:


I've always considered that to be the "politically correct" objection to the act. As we can no longer even acknowledge biblical sins out in the open any more, the message needed to be tweaked just a bit for the sins the atheists happen to agree with too.


Tell the truth, up to the time this thread was started I had never looked at sex between humans and animals as anything but a perversion. To see it called "animal abuse" is startling to me, to say the least. My dictionary calls this type of view: anthropomorphism.

If I cared that much about animals' emotional well-being I could not, in good conscience, eat that next pork chop.

05-25-10  03:11pm - 5325 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Boy, you guys are sensitive. I never ever thought of bestiality as animal abuse but of degradation of human beings and of the human spirit! Some lines you just don't cross!

05-25-10  12:50pm - 5325 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Beastiality (or bestiality) could be found in great quantities on the usenet at one time. There were various groups dedicated to it. It was almost overwhelmingly sex between women and dogs, ponies or donkeys. Because of the degrading nature of the material many countries have outlawed it and one, therefore, sees less and less of it. Same with anything depicting non-consensual violence against women. Some things are truly obscene!

05-22-10  03:01pm - 5328 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I believe there are plenty of small sites that have stopped updating, but still accept new members, and the members won't realize the sites have stopped updating until after they have joined. Not exactly the same situation as what happened at American Vice, but like I say, I think American Vice is a class act. Just sorry to see them go.


I thought they were a class act as well! I haven't done too much downloading from their site lately but really liked their earlier contents and especially the hands-on attitude of the web master. He almost made you feel you were friends.

This whole thing almost reminds me of the Betamax vs. VHS battle. The wrong people survived. I only discovered yesterday that American Vice actually had HD Wide Screen material, and a fair bit of it, too .. something I haven't seen with the competition. It wasn't true HD but was close enough and better quality than anything I have seen at Videosz or Video Box.

05-22-10  10:35am - 5329 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


I guess in these economically turbulent days it is not the smartest of moves to subscribe to a site on a yearly basis.

One of my Favorite DVD sites, American Vice, just went out of business and here I had eight months to go on my membership.

Quite frankly, I did see it coming and won't miss the site for what it became in recent days. At one time it was cutting edge, updating with niche material that no one else carried but lately it had become too main stream and with between one and two listless updates a day there was no way it could keep up with the big boys and their five daily updates.

I wonder how many more porn sites will bite the dust in the months to come? Makes you nervous about long-term memberships, doesn't it?

05-22-10  10:16am - 5329 days #35
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Colm4:


I am the opposite of you all; I hate downloading and collecting and watched most of my stuff probably dozens of times.
I really want new stuff, but I find it just too time consuming to download and search.


Well, you are making the most of what you got, Colm. That's certainly a good thing. I could save myself a lot of money for sites and hard drives that way!

05-21-10  12:40pm - 5330 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Arghh! Just got off the chat line with Epoch trying to find out if the renewal could be done with the special rate we are being offered. Answer was no. So, all I could do was cancel, hoping that down the road a similar good offer will come my way.

Darn, I really love this site but would find it unfair to the extreme if I had to pay $ 14.95 recurring (their bonus offer,) a sum that would normally be quite enticing, while others get it for $ 9.95! I guess the only thing to do is to subscribe on a yearly basis when the time comes, that should come to approx. the same monthly amount. I haven't looked yet, just assuming.

P.S. Problem solved. I just looked at the yearly rate and it is $ 89.00. Seeing that I was going to keep this site anyway I'll go that route when the time comes. Edited on May 21, 2010, 01:18pm

05-21-10  11:52am - 5330 days #33
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I don't see any mistake. "Tedious" works, but so does "arduous". Trying to to build a photo or video collection by searching through TGP sites takes a huge amount of time and effort. Paysites cost dollars, but the quality is so much better, and it's so much easier.


Yes, I completely agree with you, that's why I haven't been back to TGP sites since '07. As to my mistake, now I'm really embarrassed. Blame encroaching old age or the fact that English is my second language. Arduous is indeed okay, I got it mixed up with "ardent" in my mind!

05-21-10  11:44am - 5330 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


As a quick aside ...

Be sure to catch the news of the Reality Kings discount just posted by Ken.



Drat, just missed out by three days. Does it ever do any good to get in touch with webmasters in order to convert. I would definitely recur with that kind of price tag.

05-21-10  09:47am - 5330 days #31
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky:


In my experience the vast majority of TGP's redirect to other TGP's, which redirect....ad nauseum. It's hard finding good ones, but there are quite a few. Since this ain't the place for that, I won't mention any of them.

TGP surfing is also an excellent way to get a virus, so in good conscience I actually wouldn't recommend it; it's just that ten years experience makes it easier for me to find what I want in relative safety.


I haven't been back to a TGP site since 2007 because of the drawbacks and dangers you mentioned. I do visit some of the ATK promotional sites at times because they're not sneaky and freely give you a few samples of their latest updates therefore making the "should I or shouldn't I rejoin" a bit easier.

BTW, replace the "arduous" in my original post with "tedious!" I just noticed the mistake.

05-21-10  09:36am - 5330 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


I'll never really understand the criticism of Reality Kings. Much like my taste in music, I can't say I've listened to the radio in the last 10 years and haven't watched music television stations since the 90s. So I'll be listening to something and someone says, "I'm so sick of that. Everybody listens to it." Always to my surprise since I had never heard of the band before buying their cd. You have to follow the trends to know what the trends are. For the rest of us, we can be the middle ground of the overcrowded trendy crowd and the overcrowded I'm not trendy crowd.


Well, I have always steered clear of these mega sites after my bad experience with Naughty America (way too much silicone, story lines too short) but your review convinced me to give RK a try and it immediately jumped to the top when it comes to the "favorites in video" category.

I am so sorry now that I took out long term subscriptions to two DVD sites because they cannot compare when it comes to quality and originality. I wish Pat hadn't mentioned the relatively inferior quality of the Bangbros videos because, between these two sites, I think I could have been kept happy when it comes to movies. I am still hanging on to my favorite picture sites, of course.

Did you see my comment at RK? If you didn't, thanks again for your thorough review. You helped me make up my mind and I'm grateful. And for the first time ever I actually find myself watching WHOLE scenes!

05-20-10  12:23pm - 5331 days #29
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky:


Aren't we sort of hunter-gatherers by nature? Squirrel reminded me of that character from the movie Ice Age, Scrat, who has this enormous stockpile of acorns. He knows he can't possibly eat that many acorns in his little varmint life.

I collect pictures, softcore primarily, and I have periods when instead of spending money on a paysite I surf TGPs and nick pics from there. I end up with a lot of repeats but it's still fun and it's a great way to see what the new sites have to offer.

I also collect books (not porn: poetry, novels, philosophy mostly). I have piles of them all around the house. Many of them haven't been opened. I just like to have them around. My bathroom looks like a lending library.

My is that the hunt is definitely more exciting than the feast that comes afterwards. There doesn't even have to be a feast. It's just nice to know I can have one if and when I want it.


Ah, another book collector. I gave away 32 large boxes of books when we had to move from a house to a comparatively tiny two bedroom apartment. The only thing that mitigated the pain was the fact that the acid used in most paper had started to turn the pages of my older books yellow and brittle.

P.S. Before I discovered the joy of subscribing to pay sites I used to collect a lot of pictures through those TGP sites but it was a long and arduous process because so many times I was redirected to another TGP site (rather than to a limited sample set of pictures) which in turn redirected me to a third one and so on and so on. So I haven't been back lately.

05-20-10  12:07pm - 5331 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Poor Messmer,
The good news is it's not really messmer at all. The gay aliens finally got to him. All of his conscious is buried deep under the evil alien influence, fighting a seemingly impossible battle to gain dominance of his physical shell.

Next he'll be listening to acid house, saying things like "gimme a high 5" watching soap operas, declaring Pamela Anderson and Joan Collins the sexiest women in the world, and leading a crack Canadian mercenary squad to invade Guatemala.

If he ever asks to phone home though don't let him. Mainly because home is now a small planet orbiting a binary star 106.5 light years away, meaning the charge will be $17,000,000,000,000, even at off peak cheap rate.


Hey, this reminds me, squirrel. Gay is one area I haven't strayed into yet but if those "gay aliens" are real then who knows what else they might do to me. I'd talk to you longer but Pam and David are coming on in a few minutes so I'll have to run. High Five, brother!!

05-20-10  12:00pm - 5331 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I like Reality Kings, especially Mike's Apartment. There's lots of naughty, belly-down-flat sex there. Most of the girls are HOT. Woof!


I watched my first episode from Mike's Apartment last night and was impressed because they really manage to make the scene look authentic. Improbable but authentic! I found the same to be true in the other categories I've looked into as well. I'm not going to apologize for liking this site.

05-20-10  11:54am - 5331 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I`ve been a recent member of Bang Bros, Reality Kings, Brazzer and Naughty America. I just joined Reality Kings again last week. Of all the above mentioned. I think that Bang bros has the least appealing video quality and I didn`t enjoy the content as much as the others.


Thanks for the tip and the warning, Pat. I do not hold Brazzers or Naughty America in high regard because of the over abundance of enhanced breasts in both sites. I find RK to be "enhanced-light" and really like every one of their sites I have looked into so far. If Bang Bros. movies had been of the same quality that would have been ideal because I am really sick of the ordinary DVD sites. Too bad, and thanks again.

05-19-10  06:56pm - 5331 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I thought you were going to confess that you were female. That would have been a shock, but one that I could handle.

But to read that you now consider Reality Kings your favorite porn site, just goes to show that I never really knew you at all.

Our tastes are completely different. I knew they were different, but not that much.

LOL.


No, female I'm not!

I guess you could say my taste is becoming broader with age and experience, that sounds better! LOL. But it all boils down to having looked for too long in too many places for the site that has mature women undressing slowly (lots of lingerie an absolute requirement) until all is revealed!

In my fruitless search I have sampled everything. I have switched from pictures to videos and back to pictures. I've searched in just about every niche there is, ranging from teen to grannies, from BBW to BDSM, from hairy to shaved. From softcore to hardcore and back.

However in both picture sets and movies, in all categories, I have always complained about one thing: that there was too quick a transition from fully clothed to the action. One moment they were dressed, next moment they were on the bed, starkers!

RK is the first site that seems to take its time with the introduction to the scene to follow. I like that! I like it a lot better than the vast majority of videos I've looked at lately at the DVD sites, which seem to have gone mostly anal and Gonzo! The video quality on RK is better, too. Yep, I think I'm a convert! I still like a softcore leisurely strip as well, so I haven't forsaken my principles altogether, but I can live with this mega site for a while. I really think it's fascinating.

05-19-10  04:22pm - 5331 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


.. to my old friends who think they know my taste. I thought I knew my taste but find to my delight that I really like Reality Kings and will most likely keep subscribing to the site. The quality of their recent movies is outstanding in mpeg4.

One question is the quality of the Bangbros. movies comparable to that of RK? If so, I won't bother with DVD sites any longer.

05-17-10  02:51pm - 5333 days #27
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


I'm sort of anal with my video collection. I always watch all my videos before I add the files to my permanent library. (At least a skim-through viewing of the video.)


That's probably how all normal people would do it, goldfish. Problem is I'm not normal.

Originally Posted by Goldfish:

I do enjoy the thrill of the chase and going for the latest and greatest but I also enjoy reviewing my old stuff while I'm purging and organizing.


I, too, will review my old stuff while purging but no matter how enticing the clip or picture set may be, if it is the size of a postage stamp when viewed with a monitor with a much higher resolution then the pleasure in viewing it is gone. Should see some of my 800 x 600 px pictures .. horrible. That's where I am anal: if it isn't crisp and clear it goes!

PS. Haven't quite figured out yet how to use that quote business properly, so it looks a bit messed up. Edited by Staff on May 20, 2010, 05:04am

05-17-10  02:38pm - 5333 days #52
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


Nice! I'm moving to Germany.


Aw, you'd probably see nothing but Jeans these days. Might as well stay where you are!

05-17-10  02:33pm - 5333 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I know I bitch and whine and cry a lot about restrictions on porn and censorship and the enemies of everything fun but I at least feel I'm helping somewhat by paying for my fix--I mean entertainment! Entertainment!--and supporting the people who actually produce the stuff that makes life suck a little bit less. These free 'tube sites are just going to hurt the industry and make it implode from all the watch-but-don't-pay demand. I hope they figure out something soon because I'd hate to see it shrink and shrivel (no jokes) as it becomes a victim of its own success.


It's the old attitude from the early years of the Internet: "If it's on the net I shouldn't have to pay for it." This helped, in a way, to eliminate the cost for web browsers etc., but in the meantime a whole industry has come to depend for their revenue on quality pay sites and to rob the producers and performers of the fruits of their labor is despicable. And then to make the excuse that it is not really stealing is hypocritical to the extreme! I do not use one single 'tube site for this reason.

05-17-10  02:02pm - 5333 days #25
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


For the first time I have stuff that I haven't looked at since I downloaded over a year ago, however that's mostly because I've been lazy and haven't sorted it and put it into the regular rotation (bench players have to be vetted before making it into prime time). I've become rather ruthless about sorting my old stuff. I can usually tell when I'm in a good sorting mood for cleaning out my old crap because I find myself deleting a lot of so-so stuff.

Also, why keep it if you aren't going to watch it? I'm sure if Badandy started to watch a few vids every day he could probably go well into his senior years before seeing a repeat ... and by then his brain will be shot and think it's all new anyways We all like to preach about the golden age of porn coming to an end and the need to stock up the reserves in case porn Armageddon comes. But at some point, at least for me, there is such a thing as too much. Like most everyone else, I enjoy searching for the next delectable download but I don't spend as much time doing it any more since I know is always going to be something new to find. For me, if you aren't going to enjoy the fruits of your labor you've just become a slave to the labor itself at which point you either need a raise (which I'm not giving myself ... at least literally) or reset your priorities.


Well, I am making a start when it comes to changing my ways. For the past two days I've been deleting one file after the other. Strange, at one time they seemed so hot (at least the sample first five minutes) and eminently keepable to be viewed in full, at leisure, at a later time (see subject of post) but now they are small and grainy and certainly have no business on my hard drive.

It would be different if I had collected by model, then I would be tempted to keep everything of hers, but my job is being made easier by the fact that I don't collect that way so if better quality videos and pictures have come along in the meantime I can go to the old and eliminate without compunction. It's going to be a long job, though even if I'm not badandy!

05-17-10  10:08am - 5334 days #50
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


Ah, so sorry you were deprived of cheerleaders.


I don't feel deprived in connection with cheerleaders, goldfish! I feel deprived because some of my earliest excitement came from seeing a woman's dress being blown up by the wind, revealing those sexy stockings and garter belts and full panties. I am still looking for the same kind of shot to this day, that's why my agreement re. the point of "awareness" that was brought up by Ed. I believe he is right.

05-17-10  10:01am - 5334 days #49
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Does that explain why your wolfie is howling at the moon? Because he years to return to his roots? I thought that wolves (and werewolves) were supposed to come from England or some such place. If you find any in the U.S. or Canada, they must have missed seeing "An American Werewolf in London". Werewolves (and the more normal kind) are supposed to stay in the countryside. It's when they come to London and the other big cities that they get into trouble.


LOL. No, My wolfie is howling because he can't find the site!

05-16-10  08:35am - 5335 days #23
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Thanks, guys. I thought I was a weirdo but if I am I know now that I have company!

05-16-10  08:33am - 5335 days #22
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by james4096:


After reading this thread, I have to admit that collecting it might be 90% of the fun for me. I have enough porn to last me for years, but that first moment inside the members area after joining and then staying up going through and downloading new stuff is very exciting.


Isn't that the truth, james4096. Exactly what happens to me.

05-16-10  08:21am - 5335 days #21
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


I am sure this is something I touched on last year or the year before.


So it was you, squirrel. I remembered dimly that the subject had been discussed before but couldn't remember when or by whom. Thanks!

05-16-10  08:14am - 5335 days #46
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


What are you talking about? There is a Canadian football league. Doug Flutie kicked some butt up there in Canada.


My formative years were spent in Germany, goldfish!

05-15-10  09:28am - 5336 days #44
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I suspect a big part of the school uniform thing (for many people) is that's what girls wore when they first became properly "aware" of them.

For me the cheerleader thing does nothing as I don't think I'd even heard of them until long after I left school, and they are still not common in the UK. In that sense the uniform means nothing - I didn't grow up with it and thus it doesn't seem like a real uniform. I know some UK teams etc have experimented with cheerleaders but for most they would just be a pointless distraction from the game. I don't know if that's related to the stop-start nature of American football in comparison to the continuous-play nature of traditional football?

It's probably not helped by the fact that the only people I've ever seen dressed as cheerleaders in real life were my daughter and some of her friends when they were 9.


I feel the same way about cheerleaders' uniforms because, in my culture, American football did not play a role. I think you put your finger right on it when you talk about that point of "awareness." I think most of our later preferences for certain niches are being shaped by it!

05-15-10  09:16am - 5336 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Don't worry, you're not alone, messmer. I think I spend way too much time downloading--or at least my computer spends too much time downloading--rather than spending the same amount of time actually watching this filthy shit. What's even worse is that I too don't watch all of it either! Just gigs and gigs of data just going to waste...

...Or waiting for that special day when the Internet fails, the Puritans regain power, and modern civilization collapses into an apocalypse and everyone spends their remaining days fighting for bits of food, water, shelter and of course fuel, a la Road Warrior (to run your computer and porn-filled hard drives). Call me crazy but I think the majority of today's American politicians are moronic prudes who think the greatest threats to 'freedom' are homosexuality, atheism, science, and of course evil, evil, filthy porn.

But I think I am ahead of these birdbrains by a couple of steps because not only do I have a lot of porn, but a lot of porn that I have yet to even watch, thus more reason to protect it with my post-apocalyptic life. So even when they start blacklisting sites and then outlaw all porn I'll have tons of videos and photosets to 'fall back' on. But knowing my luck I'll fall asleep watching some video instead of pulling guard duty and a bunch of armed post-apocalyptic teabaggers will overrun my porn shelter, destroy my hard drives (in front of my own eyes, no less), and then hang me for 'obscenity'!

So yes, for now I prefer the hunt to the kill.


LOL. I don't have that apocalyptic a view (not that it couldn't happen) but only yesterday when the subject of ISP imposed usage limits came up I was thinking that I would actually cancel my internet connection, if my ISP tried to limit me, because I use it mostly for porn and would still have a couple of years' supply of porn to look at. I would miss the hunt, though!!

05-15-10  09:11am - 5336 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


There's a lot of porn that I downloaded onto my PC that I've never bothered to view. I would love to delete the inferior material. But I shudder to think of all the time it would take to look through the porn files to select what I really want to keep. It just seems easier to buy new external hard drives and fill them up with still more porn.


It's overwhelming isn't it? Once in a while I make an effort and start with file one on external drive one but then I contemplate the other 2 TB to go, get impatient, go on-line and download some more!

1701-1750 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 22 27 34 Page 35 36 39 42 45 51 52 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.08 seconds.