Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: messmer (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (2582)  |   Threads Started (156)

1801-1850 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 22 27 36 Page 37 38 41 44 47 51 52 Next Page >

04-29-10  10:01am - 5351 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


Maybe it's because I've had good experiences with forums, but I completely disagree with you. While I do think that a good webmaster has a clear idea of what they wants their content to be like and follows it, I also think that a good webmaster encourages and looks out for ideas from their members and is willing to try suggestions if they feel that it can fit into what their vision is for their site.


Naughty America, and I assume that's the good experience you are referring to, must have a not so good webmaster because I saw so many requests for more ethnic models and lesbian scenes that were totally ignored that I lost faith that anyone was listening. They certainly didn't listen to my requests for more models with natural breasts! But we've been through that before, so no need to reply or take offense.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-25-10  07:02pm - 5355 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I'm not disagreeing with your statement but it begs the question of why a site would have a forum if not to see what their members think of them and their content. I would hope that a site uses what is inside their forum and build from comments. It's true that some comments may be completely usueless but you can also find the seed of your destruction or survival. Clearly if a specific theme keeps croping out in the forum then not addressing it can
have serious repurcussion on your future.


I was referring to the occasional poll that a site brings our way, Pat. That should be quite accurate unless many members can't even be bothered to tick a box in order to further their preferences. When it comes to forums an estimate of the users preferences, based on a handful of posts by only a few, would be far less accurate, in my opinion.

Of course, you are right. Sites do have forums in order to see what their members think of them and their content, problem is hardly anyone uses them as I stated above.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-25-10  10:45am - 5355 days #108
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


PP just made a telling comment in his review today of Face Down Ass Up University.
He made the point that fully & part clothed can be very erotic, more so than more explicit material.
He is absolutely right.

It has distilled out an important market gap that fans of striptease seem to be falling down at the moment.

There are non-nude 'tease' sites.

There are 'artistic nude' sites.

There are so called 'softcore' sites focussing on masturbation & toyplay rather than the more erotic tease. I would call them midcore not softcore.

Back to my initial premise.
Please may we have more proper tease sites going to coy & explicit full nudity, but staying softcore?

Ie no masturbation or toy play, which destroys the illusion of a lady that wouldn't dream of taking her clothes off for the camera.

( See definition of nudity here: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_thr...d.html?threadid=1382 )

Thank you in anticipation!

Cap'n.


The only two sites I ever came across that even came close to our ideal were: "Village Ladies" and "Southern Charms" (some of the ladies). Trouble is quality in both was iffy if not downright terrible, and some of the ladies who did that complete strip from ordinary clothes to complete nude were a bit hard on the eye.

And don't thank me, Cap'n, since I'm only offering observations not solutions.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-25-10  10:24am - 5355 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I heartily agree with that!

My intent was to make a generally global statement, but you are right that is specific too.



Cap'n.


And it was a good global statement, Cap'n!

I should have answered more specifically: Yes, polls accurately reflect members' views but are useless to the site because they would have to diversify too much to oblige everyone and that would mean that no one is very impressed.

Same for the ratings: useless because your ideal set might be my nightmare and we cancel each other out when you mark yours a five and I mark mine a one and the model thinks what the heck is wrong with me, why did I only rate a two and a half?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-25-10  10:15am - 5355 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		I wouldn't pay a dime to watch Jenna Jameson. I had to suffer from her shrill voice and fake boobs when I subscribed, very temporarily, to the Playboy channel.

But once again, I am sure I'm in the minority so don't take offense. No one who is not attractive to a large number of people would be that successful.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-25-10  10:09am - 5355 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


I think the way it goes is that women are more likely to "struggle with porn addiction" while men are more likely to just buy more porn.


You're so right. I don't feel much of a need to struggle. I go along with the flow. If it's pleasant why struggle, unless you use all of your household money on porn.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-25-10  09:54am - 5355 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


Whilst this site tends to buck the trend, in that it has many lucid regular contributors, I have noticed it is a problem generally with porn sites that they don't seem to generate much useful feedback or discussion.

There is certainly a reticence to post on many porn site fora I have seen, barring the odd one off rants.
I have been trying to work out why this is.

I feel it maybe that the majority of surfers have a limited attention span & move on quickly if they do not see anything that appeals, rather than stay & ask for what they are looking for?

Voting on Polls.

Does it give an accurate representation of the members' views?

I doubt it, as it is just down to individual interpretation of the way the question is phrased and the options given for voting.
Granted, you are more likely to get someone ticking a box than taking the trouble to create a coherent post or, heaven forbid, a new thread!!

What does our community think?

Cap'n.



Making contributions in forums is a frustrating experience because even larger sites like AO30 may have three - four posters a day which doesn't make for a very interesting exchange of ideas.

The forum you have in mind was even worse, sometimes there would be days between contributions and I finally gave up, especially since most of my remarks would have been negative, and I didn't want to hurt the web masters feelings on a daily basis!

We are very fortunate here because this one took off right from the beginning.

As to Polls, I take part in them but don't believe for one moment that my ideas make any difference because they are never introduced. (see my comment above re. making negative posts) I am being out-shouted by the majority.

Same with rating picture sets and models. I will absolutely despise a set for its lack of imagination and general blandness, yet see with bewilderment that it has received a very high mark from the majority, while the sets I love and rate highly tend to score low on average.

I think both you and I wish that sites, rather than trying to cater to every taste, stuck to one niche. For some of the niches you might find only about five percent of Porn Users that are interested, but counting their number world wide, this would still be enough to make the site a success.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-25-10  09:09am - 5355 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_membe...oes_met-art.com_have

At this time MET's membership exceeds 930,000. Nearly 80,000 new members join each month. Think of the $$$ they are making. I know this because i am close to a one of their webmasters. Its an Incredible business!
>>>>>>>>>>
<<<<<<<<<<

No date is given for the statement, and I don't know how to check its accuracy. But most Met-art models are B cup or smaller, so the silent majority probably includes the "loud minority" at PU.


Ah, bless you. Your last sentence makes my day!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-24-10  07:07pm - 5356 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		To whodoyathink:

What I get from the Brazzers Forum is the fact that Brazzers has 350.000 plus members, of whom roughly 850 contribute to the forums.

In other words, a silent majority of 340.000 plus who never make their views and preferences known in a forum. Just as I thought. These abominations (to me) wouldn't continue to thrive if there were no market for them. Edited on Apr 24, 2010, 07:11pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-24-10  09:39am - 5356 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Turn ons: Natural looking women, pale skin, breasts a touch saggy with big nipples. Everyday yesterday's underwear.In pictures and videos, women who start fully clothed and then slowly strip to nothing.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-24-10  09:28am - 5356 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		You had guts, Denner. I was asked in the past and refused because I had been badly burned on the usenet after giving away too many personal details.

I honestly regret (and it really bothers me) that I cannot be totally open about my identity, profession, likes, dislikes etc. because most Forum members have become my long distance friends (even if they don't know it) with whom I'd like to share personal details and a bottle or two of Tuborg.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-24-10  09:16am - 5356 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


I was also curious who does go with the grain out there? As RagingBuddhist mentioned porn is a business so someone is buying the plastic glam porn at Vivid and BangBros. Are you one of them? Do you enjoy the breast implants? the tattoos? The grunting dudes giving the facials?


I sometimes think that we get a skewed picture in this forum of who likes what or who doesn't like what. For some unknown reason most of the regular contributors dislike intensely: implants, tattoos and grunting dudes which makes one wonder why do they keep producing this garbage?

I have a sneaking suspicion that there is a silent majority of the membership of PU (and of Porn Users in general) who do like these things, otherwise they wouldn't be so ubiquitous in the porn world. Brazzers, BangBros etc. would have bitten the dust long ago if there weren't tons of folks who just love those big boobs (enhanced or not), etc.

Trouble is the silent majority tends to stay silent so we'll never really know.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-22-10  10:26am - 5358 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		I gotta be honest: What I said before and that is most of Tarantino's films.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-22-10  10:11am - 5358 days #30
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Hey, Denner, it was great to read your interview. You've been one of my favorite PU members for years and it is so nice to get to know you a bit better this way.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-20-10  07:13pm - 5360 days #36
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I don't know if this is truly a change of direction but I certainly hope it is. If nothing else that it is a step in the right direction.

http://www.adultfyi.com/read.php?ID=41316


Welcome news, Pat. Should send the link to Naughty America and Brazzers, among others.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-14-10  01:47pm - 5366 days #26
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


Well, at least it isn't as 'in your face' as a pop up.

TBH I don't ever remember having a pop-under.

Cap'n.


You probably never will, Cap'n, with your predilection for pics. If you should ever subscribe to Porn.com in a temporary lapse of better judgment (it's about videos) you'll find out quickly about pop-unders as well as dramatically increased spammed email.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-14-10  01:09pm - 5366 days #24
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		This is not so much about browsers but some of the features of browsers. All of them stop pop-ups these days but is there any way to stop pop-unders? I keep getting one from a dating service and don't even realize that there is an open window from this site until I close my browser.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-13-10  07:58am - 5367 days #20
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by justme:


Yep, they still develop the browser.


Thanks, justme, I must download the most recent version and see how it runs!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-12-10  10:23am - 5368 days #17
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by justme:


No one else uses the Sea Monkey browser?

I'm not a hopey-changey kind of guy, I use Sea Monkey because it still holds the same interface & menus that go back all the way to Netscape 4


I had Sea Monkey as a back up browser for the longest time and liked it a lot because it had the same kind of password protection as Firefox and Netscape 8. Do they still upgrade?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-11-10  10:46am - 5369 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


I kind of bounce around. I've noticed certain sites don't like Firefox. The OrgyMax sites for example, the download buttons on Firefox are all out of alignment. Also the Innocent High network had problems displaying correctly in Firefox.


Same thing used to happen to me until I changed my minimum font (under content and fonts and colors advanced)to None. Now the pages display properly.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-10-10  06:40pm - 5370 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Keep up the raging, RB. It's a good kind of raging!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-10-10  06:37pm - 5370 days #52
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		I don't know why I bother with the whole inbred, elitist lot of you!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-10-10  06:17pm - 5370 days #34
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I thought I was agreeing with him, because I too think those complaints are not exclusive to porn.


I should have read PP's reply and your original post a bit slower. I took a casual glance and thought that PP had made a mistake. My apologies! Edited on Apr 10, 2010, 06:20pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-10-10  12:17pm - 5370 days #32
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		I think the Pink Panther meant to say that the complaints that you get are NOT exclusive to porn because he goes on to mention the looney tunes complaints that he gets in his own profession.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-10-10  12:01pm - 5370 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		I use Firefox 3.6.3. This version does not appear to be as stable as previous ones because it crashed on me twice during the past 24 hours.

I would like to give Chrome a go but would like to know if it has a master password so that only I can use it, or at least a password to protect my user names and passwords in between sessions?

I have Firefox wipe clean every trace of my activity the moment I shut it down (history, cookies) but it has the ability, somehow, to keep remembering and protecting my passwords even though all other cookies were deleted. I haven't found this in any other browser yet. Once you delete cookies and history etc. your passwords are gone as well unless you want to use an external program.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-08-10  09:22am - 5372 days #33
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by larss:


So what you are looking for is over forty, saggy breasts and unshaven pubes?

How about allmilfs.com ? Not looked at it too deeply myself as I prefer slightly younger (30ish) and less hairy.


BTW, I eagerly went to allmilfs.com, saw what I liked and when I tried to subscribe I got the join page for AllOver30, a site I already subscribe to. But thanks for the thought!

I have the same problem with them that I have had with so many other sites, not enough lingerie shoots, not enough really mature ladies (even though I love models in their thirties and forties as well) and let them know it in no uncertain terms. They are the Parkay I referred to in another post. I like them, I like their models, but most photo sets are shot for an audience with a taste different from mine. So if I want a set that really appeals to me I have to be content with one, at the most two, a week.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-08-10  09:06am - 5372 days #32
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Oh, sure. What I like is uncommon enough that I've spent years churning my own butter, if you'll pardon the expression.

Too bad that I don't like bondage and such. I don't know if that niche goes over the 10% satisfaction rate for the general porn-using population, but maybe it does.


LOL. I like the expression! have never given BDSM a thought myself but must say that I do like bondage a la Kink.com. I've never subscribed to one of their sites and it wouldn't be my first choice but a review yesterday made me take a tour and it touched a libidinous chord, so, who knows. I might end up there yet. Lingerie clad grannies are too hard to find.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-08-10  08:54am - 5372 days #31
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by larss:


So what you are looking for is over forty, saggy breasts and unshaven pubes?

How about allmilfs.com ? Not looked at it too deeply myself as I prefer slightly younger (30ish) and less hairy.


Sounds just about right to me, larss, except you forgot the sexy lingerie!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  08:02pm - 5373 days #28
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


I've got a $9.95 link to Reality Kings that I'm pretty sure still works (haven't tried it out myself yet):

http://www.realitykings.com/enter.htm?id=freeonesrev

As far as the three major networks mentioned here, I think the reason that Bangbros and Reality Kings have less women with implants is because both companies shoot the majority of their material in Florida and not southern California. SoCal, it seems, is filled with enhanced breasts, whether the girls are in porn or not.


I never thought of the subject of "enhanced" in geographical terms, hodayathing, but I'm sure you have a point. Most stars and porn stars are found in Southern California and most have implants. They can improve a clothed silhouette but not a naked body. Thanks for pointing out to me that both RK and BB are located in Florida. Might see some different faces in their videos as well because of that? Or not?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  07:56pm - 5373 days #27
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I have been a recent member of both site and I'd say that Reality has less ladies with implants than BangBros. I can't give you a number because I don't remember. I also prefered Reality Kings content to BangBros.


Thanks for that input, Pat. Very helpful!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  03:48pm - 5373 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Though the word "documentary" might be a stretch, Showtime had a reality series (there's the problem!) about Seymore Butts called "Family Business" that ran for at least three seasons I think. I have yet to watch any of it for a number of reasons, but mostly because I usually enjoy watching his videos and I don't want to have another 'favorite' ruined because I made the mistake of taking a peek behind the scenes.

This may also not be exactly what you're looking for since he does mostly gonzo POV stuff that is not exactly the mainstream but it still probably reflects a lot of American porn, at least stuff in the Valley. Interestingly the show's title is pretty literal as he does work with his family in the business of selling his videos and he's supposedly pretty close to them, though he has yet to get married or find a long term partner. Wonder why?


I didn't watch Family Business with any regularity for the same reason you mentioned. I don't like looks behind the scenes and should have never watched the documentary I was talking about earlier. Too disillusioning. I remember one thing though, that Seymore was doting on a little boy. Must have been by a short term partner.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  03:42pm - 5373 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Kevin:


Do you mind letting me know what browser & version you are using? I just tested it in Firefox 3.5 and IE8 and it's working correctly there.


Firefox 3.6.3, Kevin. Here let me try again to see if it has corrected itself.

I'm back. It works perfectly now. Must have been the transition. Thanks.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  03:36pm - 5373 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Kevin:


You're right, you probably caught me right in the middle of the upgrade. If you notice anything peculiar from this point on, don't hesitate to let us know.


Just to let you know, the smileys are still opening new windows on my computer, Kevin, rather than allow themselves to be part of my post.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  03:32pm - 5373 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Would you believe I couldn't tell you the size because it was never important to me. I went strictly by feel. If I could put my hand under a breast and lift it to my lips, that was heaven for me. That's why saggies are almost a necessity for me, size is immaterial.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  03:22pm - 5373 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Thanks, Kevin. I think that's a great idea even though I like looking at the smileys. Were you making the change just a few minutes ago? Reason I ask is because my smileys acted weird when I was trying to apply them to a post. I'd click on one and a new window would open with only that smiley in it rather than show up next to my post. I had to make them the old fashioned way and then put them next to the text.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  03:05pm - 5373 days #24
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Is internet porn really so much like television, wherein the viewer's principle of choice is what's "least objectionable"?


Trouble is, Drooler, that niche material is completely under represented and understandably so. What web owner / web master wants to have a site that caters to about 5 - 10% of Porn Users. No money in that and so, those of us who are not satisfied with content that appeals to the other 90% have a hard time finding exactly what we are looking for .. so we are practically forced to go for what, to us, is second best or "least objectionable" as you put it.

Niche One: sexy and appealing lingerie .. young people are not interested. Cotton thongs are fine with them.

Niche Two: Truly mature women (for those of us over fifty who think that someone in their fifties and sixties can still look darned good.) Again, most younger PUs shudder, they don't want to see Grannies.

Niche Three: Hair! Again, to most PUs hair has almost become a sign of hygienic neglect, almost uncleanness while only thirty years ago it was normal!

Now combine the three for my ideal site and you come up with Zilch! So, what can I substitute? Remember that old commercial: If you don't have Parkay you can always use butter! Except in my case it's been the other way around for far too long. I've had to murmur to myself: Well, if you can't have butter you can always use Parkay! Edited on Apr 07, 2010, 03:15pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  02:49pm - 5373 days #23
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by larss:


I almost feel embarrassed to mention this site again, as it is the one and only site that I have reviewed, but Miss Hybrid seems to me to be who you are looking for. She does have enhanced breasts, and I am not sure what you mean by mature, but I suggest that you have a look at the previews on her site.


Mature: over forty! As to enhanced breasts, I hate them so much that I'll never find out if Miss Hybrid looks good in them or not, Larss. Soothing aside to Miss Hybrid: I'm sure you look fantastic but can you make them sag? I love saggies!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  02:44pm - 5373 days #22
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Miss Hybrid:


i agree with RB



Well, okay, then you or RB please give me the url of a site that features pictures or videos of MATURE women slowly stripping in a casual way from fully clothed until naked, with plenty of lingerie thrown in! Smartasses!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  02:37pm - 5373 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  01:04pm - 5373 days #17
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by nostromo:


I beg to differ with them.


Please don't get me wrong, nostromo. I appreciate your reply as well as the fact that, for many, sites like Bangbros and Reality Kings are quite pleasurable. Who knows, might be for me as well. I must take the tour to see if they have any real MILFS in any of their sites. That could sway me!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  12:59pm - 5373 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


I don't know fellas, last time we were talking about these networks, I decided to put a comparison together to see how bad the implant percentages would be. Bang Bros is much easier to come up with because they were tired of being compared to big boob networks and labeled all their implant models as "enhanced tits" to show their difference in them and the sites with many implants. On Reality Kings and Brazzers, I just took the first 48 models to come up with a brief, but most likely fairly accurate look at their models. Here are those numbers.

Reality Kings 7 of 48 or 14.6%
Bang Bros 277 of 1624 or 17%
Brazzers 26 of 48 or 54.1%

As you can see this is a huge difference. My guess is that the difference has to do with type of models. For example, Reality Kings has the excellent Mike's Apartment which is about 95% Euro models, very few implants. They also have Mike in Brazil, very few implants on Brazilian women. They also are not afraid to have black, Latina models on any of their sites and these models usually are more likely not to have implants. Bang Bros is similar to RK in the black/Latina part, but only have a small percentage of Euro models. Brazzers is almost all American models. I don't remember them having many Latinas, very few Euro and very few black models. Lots and lots of blonde beach types though.

I'm sure Reality Kings and Brazzers numbers could probably vary +/- 5% as a whole, but I think that's a pretty fair way to at least get something of a view of how those breakdown. I still have a membership going with Bang Bros and have downloaded over 400 GB from them over the last few months. Just opened a new membership at Reality Kings for probably the 12th time in 3 years and intend to stay for a few months on it as well. Last time I was on Brazzers was January 2009, if I remember correctly and downloaded a total of 3 videos, one day signed in, 29 not signed in.


Thanks, as usual, for a very thorough reply, exotics! And for being on the "pro" site along with nostromo. Gives me a chance to think things over and not reject these sites (except for Brazzers) out of hand.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  12:48pm - 5373 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by malikstarks:


I'm NOT a huge fan of either site but I'm a member at both for only $9.99 each. It's hard to pass up for that price, especially with the massive archives of those two sites.

I still have a link for Bangbros for $9.95 if you change your mind and want to try it out for a month:

http://www.bangbrosnetwork.com/t1/pps=bangfreesp/join.htm

My link for Reality kings no longer works.

That said knowing Messmer's taste, I'm not sure either one is for him.


Thanks, malikstarks. I appreciate the link and might sneak in without letting you-know-who in on it!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  12:40pm - 5373 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pornwatcher:


Has anyone actually been in a porn set? I often wonder how do they make porn. Any difference than making a regular movie, other than the obvious sex part? Do they need to remember lines? How does the director direct the porn stars?

Any documentary about this?


They had a documentary about the Porn Industry in California on HBO (I believe) not too long ago and, as I wrote in another place, it turned me off to such an extent that I couldn't enjoy my "fantasies" for a couple of weeks.

The so-called Managers are pimps, the "directors" in this day of Gonzo just tell the models: okay, I want five minutes of missionary, five minutes of cowgirl, five minutes of reverse cowgirl, five minutes of anal (if she'll do it) ending up with a cum shot to the face for the climax.

The job must be brutal for the guys, there they were, all sitting and standing behind the scenes, attempting to get/keep themselves hard .. a pathetic sight but necessary since most of the directors (and the public) appear to want instant sex nowadays. No time for a gradual warming up!

Save yourself the trauma and steer away from porn sets and from "behind the scenes" clips. They show all too graphically that it is all about money. We knew that all along, of course, but didn't need to be reminded.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  12:11pm - 5373 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by nostromo:


I say Bangbros.


Thank you, nostromo, but as you can see above my friends won't let me subscribe to either site!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  11:49am - 5373 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I am amazed that you are even considering it!

Cap'n.


Well, here it is, Cap'n. I am tired of DVD sites that put out the same monotonous, low cost, low quality garbage day after day and that's all of them, even the ones I praised in the past. I am tired of picture sites that promise but don't deliver. I am tired of looking for THE site that would feature mature ladies, wearing tons of sexy lingerie who undress slowly until completely and shamelessly naked!

With the Canadian Dollar being at par I was looking at some sites this morning that feature yearly subscriptions at reasonable rates and the two sites mentioned showed up on the screen. You're right, it isn't really me, my preference would be .. see above .. but I figured by getting something at a good price (parity) for once I might just find some nuggets among the wealth of material.

But I am starting to come to my senses because long term subscriptions are usually not a very good idea. 21sextury is proof of that. I haven't been back in two weeks and have nine - ten months to go. Edited on Apr 07, 2010, 12:05pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  11:33am - 5373 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Please god no! Don't do it messsmer. Not those sites. Anything but those sites. Tats and fake breasts. I'm not going near either of those places.


Thank you, squirrel. That's a timely statement. I needed your post!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-10  09:32am - 5373 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada

I don't want to rant about "enhanced" breasts again but simply need advice from someone who has been a subscriber to both sites. Between Bangbros and Reality Kings which site contains the LEAST amount of fakes? Thank you.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-03-10  12:06pm - 5377 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Most people in porn, acting, music, media in general, are clearly complete assholes. The big difference is whether they are complete assholes to you personally. It's why it is best not to meet them.


It can be disillusioning even if you don't meet them in person. I watched a show recently (on HBO?) that took a look behind the scenes at the porn industry in California and wasn't interested in watching hardcore porn for weeks after that until the memory had faded a bit.

Some of those producers and directors and agents can be real douche bags. And the "stars" themselves go about their business so matter of factly that all illusion flies out the window!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-02-10  09:07am - 5378 days #17
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I wouldn't worry about that because they only ship by air freight. They are expanding their line because you can now get 2 Wicked pornstars Real Dolls(see link)


http://www.wickedrealdoll.com/


No good, the tits are fake!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-01-10  07:08pm - 5379 days #29
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by mbaya:


Messmer, it is very true that on Britishtease you DO get yesterday's quality. The pix are not up to todays standards and the videos are unwatchable. But, I did like the content of the photo sets.


Hi MBAYA, I agree with you without even having had a look because the content of British sites is usually far superior (going by my taste) to that of the American ones. More teasing, more lingerie .. none of that "let's get straight to the sex" (videos) or "let's get straight to nude" (photos) business that I hate so much.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

1801-1850 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 22 27 36 Page 37 38 41 44 47 51 52 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.

Loaded in 0.17 seconds.