|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
turboshaft (0)
|
| 1801-1850 of 1958 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 22 | 27 | 36 | Page 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next Page > |
| 06-02-09 02:30pm - 5682 days | #11 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Great to have you back! Are we missing any more of our older members (in terms of membership)? I had a webmaster use part of a comment, not an actual review, on his site but it was discuss issues I had raised, not take them out context to promote the site. I had been a member on and off for years, so I was well aware of any faults but I was talking more about stylistic changes that I saw. I never took it too seriously, and a site only really worries me when they take my money, not my reviews. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 06-01-09 02:44pm - 5683 days | #11 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I am used to all the name calling we normally do -- the stuff that is directed towards all the webmasters, photographers, cameraman, etc. who like to lend their two cents, and their voices, to all the videos we try and enjoy. Here, in response to a user's review, I was surprised because it was in the first line of the reply...not nice. Granted, the review was not exactly the best one I have ever read, but it wasn't the worst either, and insulting any member other than yourself is uncalled for. By normal forum standards it was practically a compliment compared to what people, whether they are anonymous or not, post on sites. As a result, this is the only site on which I actually feel comfortable posting anything. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 06-01-09 02:36pm - 5683 days | #20 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I thought "Dark Knight" was good, but the overuse of special effects, not to mention Bale's Batman-from-hell voice, were pretty distracting and did not really do much for the film. I was also kind of letdown by Heath Ledger's part; it was probably the best role in the story, but people hyped it up as if it was somehow the best performance in the history of cinema. I wish they had edited it to at least try and focus on him and live up to all the hot air. Just curious, what are people's favorite of all the Batman films they have seen? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-29-09 02:00pm - 5686 days | #54 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
They should have a progressive set of safe words; one for each state, and when a certain act goes over the legally obscene line, the model names a state where it is outlawed. When she gets to California you know you are looking at the Euro version of content -- in other words, the good stuff -- so just don't enjoy it too much, or keep it well hidden in your collection. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-29-09 01:38pm - 5686 days | #16 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Ahh, the religious war on porn -- we, and our morals, are right, you are wrong, but join us and you will be "cured!" Couldn't the "Many spend hours a day chasing after these things" argument be applied to religion as well? It could also be argued that religious fanaticism is, and always has been, causing a lot more suffering in the world than the "struggle with pornography." And if it's 50% of all men who are in need of this so-called cure, then we have quite a problem on our hands, don't we? 50% of men might be deviants, but I like to think that 100% of human beings are, it's just that most of us will not admit it. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-22-09 12:37pm - 5693 days | #11 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
It really isn't that big of a deal, but just because we have had something in the past does not justify it being brought back. Getting rid of rewards and "custom" credit cards, neither of which the bill seems to address, would be a good start because it could help teach people that credit is a privilege and should be used for need not rewards or points or any of the other lures that are designed to make consumers use their cards more. I hope it does help the country, but I think people need some basic understanding of the concept of credit, not just bills with larger print or some kind of credit card bill of rights. Yes, the card issuers are not exactly open about the true nature of their practices, but I can't totally blame them for making money, or at least being very creative in trying to. It is the companies that send out multiple pre-approved offers and promise numerous extras that really have nothing to do with maintaining good credit, but ultimately it is the consumers who accept them and misuse them. This might hurt the economy some at first as consumers, regardless of their credit scores, drop cards and spend less because of either the clearer terms or new fees, but it could ultimately create more manageable debt or less of it. Maybe, as Drooler mentioned, the companies will start to compete for the customers with good credit and they will benefit from new business. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-21-09 11:03pm - 5694 days | #6 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Well, at least if they start charging annual fees it will be stated in plain language and not-so-fine print. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-21-09 10:16pm - 5694 days | #4 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I have not read too much about the bill because I have never had too many problems with my credit card (that's right, I only have one). From what I have heard it seems like the bill is designed for the average moron who is too stupid to only purchase what he or she can actually afford, unlike the apparently too few who are responsible enough to actually handle a credit card. Now, after reading this article, it looks like I will have to pay because "the legislation might have the broad effect of encouraging card issuers to become ever more reliant on fees from marginal customers as well as creditworthy cardholders -- 'deadbeats' in industry parlance, because they generate scant fee revenue." Great, I was wondering when my credit card company was going to get around to screwing me over for being a good (i.e. 'deadbeat') customer, and now it looks like they will finally have the chance. Of course they will immediately lose me as a customer and I will find a company that does business with responsible adults without some kind of good credit fee, or, as Wittyguy smartly suggested, just use prepaid cards. Concerning Drooler's original question, this is probably the best way to pay for a site -- prepaid cards. It would be nice if more sites could use Paypal, since they can transfer funds (not credit, but money you actually have) and they are pretty secure, though I understand some members here at PU dislike their service, so we could be screwed either way. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-21-09 09:44pm - 5694 days | #2 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Check out IAFD.com; it's also under the title The Asian Show, so that's why you probably had a hard time finding it. Most places seem to only have it on VOD because it's from 1997, but it looks like Adult Video Universe (part of CD Universe) has it on DVD. Hope this helps. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-16-09 07:05pm - 5699 days | #9 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
What is this "morality thing" you speak of? Just kidding -- nice to have you back, but now we have lost Messmer. Isn't there enough room for both of you? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-10-09 08:20pm - 5705 days | #11 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I couldn't agree more. I have used quite a few Macs at school and I instantly and universally ended up hating the keyboards and mice within an hour of use. Their "Mighty Mouse" is supposed to have one button act as two, but it is usually just the left button only, and the scroll wheel is more of a small dot that also rarely functions. The keyboard is undersized and a little over simplified for my tastes to really be anything more than another "it came with the computer" piece of hardware. A couple of funny things; Windows can run faster on a higher end Mac than most PCs, but a cheap Microsoft mouse can outperform their super-hip, "spry and mighty" (Apple's words) mouse. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-05-09 11:18pm - 5710 days | #13 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Now it seems most of the top competitive swimming events involve body suits for both men and women since skin, despite its potential for beauty, produces too much drag compared to whatever materials these suits are made out of. It seems natural to wear less when swimming but I remember it was one of the more covered up events at last summer's Olympics. Of course there is always beach volleyball... "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-05-09 05:58pm - 5710 days | #6 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
The regular audiences who are dumb enough to take TV news that seriously would probably have a whole list of issues with topless anchors, so I cannot imagine it getting picked up by any major news network. The real money is in bloodlust; violent crime and war are big sellers on cable news, and they can get away with showing just about any violent act as long as they preface it with the usual "Now we want to warn viewers..." I could see MTV, SpikeTV, or any other network that caters to the twenty-something Jackass crowd, coming up with some "news" program just to show off some girl's/anchor's body and gain a big audience overnight. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-05-09 12:10am - 5711 days | #35 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
My head hurts every time this case is brought up (and why the hell is it even a case?!). A woman briefly, "fleeting"ly, and accidently exposes a nipple on live TV (the horror!) and suddenly it is the crime of the decade, if not the century. How screwed up are American values when this is what the judicial branch of the federal government is debating? No wonder these aging fools are appointed to their "supreme" positions, no one would want to elect them. You could have had somebody run on stage and gun down every performer live on television and the whole debate would be about security at the Super Bowl, not excessive violence on TV. If I were a parent I would be more concerned with the extreme materialism and sexual messages in the commercials than a few seconds of non-sexual nudity during another pointless half time show. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-04-09 11:57pm - 5711 days | #34 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I haven't seen a movie in a theater in over two years, and I don't regret it for a second. Don't get me wrong; I have a love of film, but I also have the patience to wait for the next "greatest film of the year" (which always seems to be determined as soon as the year starts) when it is released on DVD. There is a certain convenience, not to mention the large price difference, that makes renting so much more appealing. I understand that going to see a film in theaters is an experience, but I am still surprised when there are releases that have such huge receipts just in their opening weekend, such as the Wolverine movie. Not to be too much of an ass, but I was kind of burned out on the whole X-Men series, not to mention the endless parade of comics-to-film adaptations of the last ten years, and I was hoping it would be a flop. The studio is probably already filming the next character in the series as I write this, so I should just accept the facts that comics as movies still sell and will be with us for a while. Back to the whole piracy and quality argument, I think we all know, since it is why we are members here, that you have to pay for quality (maybe in porn more than film), and that getting something for free, or nearly free, has its own price. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-04-09 12:14pm - 5711 days | #29 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
The entertainment industry will never admit it, but piracy is essentially free advertising. People don't buy them because they hate the film or music industry but have an interest in the art and therefore will actually help with business. The U.S. movie business in particular generates enormous profits, even with all the piracy and copying done around the world. Even if it is stealing (and it is) the industry should at least take credit for creating a product that will still sell even if it is pirated. Furthermore, thanks to Hollywood lobbying, almost all films, including ones considered historic or significant to film history, have extremely long copyrights and will probably never be in the public domain. This means that they will continue to generate profits generations after they were actually created, so movie studios and the government have little to complain about. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-03-09 12:55pm - 5712 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I realize that we are a pretty diverse group here -- with the common love of porn of course -- but it seems that most users do their surfing and collecting on PCs. I was wondering, does anyone use an Apple? A user has mentioned that ALS Scan uses Apples for their content, as I am sure plenty of other sites do if they are serious about quality porn, but it seems to be pretty rare for PU members. Given our priorities with cost this makes sense, but I would like to hear what people's setups are if they use a Mac. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-02-09 08:42pm - 5713 days | #46 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
That's an understatement. The War On Drugs is multi-generational flop that has been redeclared by every new administration, including the current one, though it is definitely well off the radar for now. Our country also holds the most prisoners in the world -- we're number one indeed -- mostly because of our excessive and widespread drug laws. I am not a drug user myself, and that includes the strongly lobbied, and therefore legal, tobacco and alcohol, but most of these laws concern not how we treat others, but rather how we treat our own bodies. Talk about intrusive! Of course, much like porn, there are meaningless moral and cause-and-effect arguments that lead nowhere except to more laws. Marijuana is a gateway drug. Really? What about alcohol as a gateway to drunkenness and death? Or what about fatty and sugary foods as gateways to obesity, cavities and more death? If the government is so worried about real criminals, then they should prioritize their efforts, or at least make an attempt to. Porn should not be a crime, but asking a kid for sex should be. Being Muslim should not be crime, but planning to commit a violent crime should be. Deciding what to put into your body should not be a crime, but then deciding to go drive a car or destroy someone's property should be. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 05-01-09 12:18am - 5715 days | #8 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
If your significant other has a problem with your love of porn, then I don't think a prepaid Visa could solve the problem. You could still wind up being "caught" (sorry for the quotes, but I can think of at least a couple of things worse than looking at porn) and there would just be more disapproval, or maybe even something worse. If she can't move on when it comes to what is a pretty innocent habit, then maybe it is time for you to move on instead. Wittyguy even called it "sneaking around" earlier, as if you are committing some sort of a crime or actually cheating on her. If you are still intent on fulfilling your wishes with prepaid plastic, I think the Visa gift cards just use your address but don't actually send a statement or receipt; you just check the balance online or over the phone (discreetly, of course) and keep the card hidden. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-28-09 11:29pm - 5717 days | #9 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
How many times have we heard this before? I have lost count the number of times a series or franchise has been been brought back from the past (sure beats creating something brand new) and reworked, rethought, redone, or simply just rehashed. Even the two newest Batman films were quite entertaining, but I kept asking myself How many Batman movies are there now? as I waited for the next explosion or overblown stunt, particularly during "Batman Begins." Even when the original creator or director is at the helm things can go, well, less than great. Just think of what happened with the Star Wars series for a good example -- could not leave well enough alone I guess. And regarding badandy's comment about American's love for "blowing shit up" -- isn't that how we have defined the summer blockbuster since its birth in the '70s? I recently saw a trailer for the new Wolverine movie (I am guessing the three X-Men films weren't enough to tell his story) and all it is explosions, gunfire, more explosions, claw slicing, and even more explosions. I won't be too surprised if it is a hit and they just start making a film to tell every other character's story. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-23-09 12:24pm - 5722 days | #19 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Maybe it is just general paranoia; we think that if a site has to store any information about us, even if it just for a tour and cannot lead to spam, then they are asking too much and we get uncomfortable. I have joined quite a few sites who require them but they are still irritating for the purpose of a tour. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-22-09 11:56pm - 5723 days | #7 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Uh, I certainly hope not! Granted there are a lot of fetishes out there, and quite a few of them involve body fluids and other such, um, "products" of the body but I have always found the whole snot and spit thing kind of disgusting. I guess this is why I am not a huge fan of the sloppy gag reflex blow job scenes so many studios and sites are producing now, though it seems like if you want to just see the drool (no offense to your name or avatar) then the spitting niche is the next logical step. I did see a scene in a video that involved nothing more than two girls spitting in other's face. Not really that nasty but not very attractive either, though I think they did have their clothes off, which I guess made it sexual or at least an attempt to make it porn. Call me crazy, but all my fantasies involve girls who don't spit, and that includes all this spitting niche material. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-20-09 02:01pm - 5725 days | #6 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
A friend of mine recently sent me a link for something called TrackMeNot, though I am sure someone else has mentioned it here in the forum before. My friend is not really into porn -- or least nowhere near as much as I am -- but he understands I am generally paranoid regardless of what I am doing on the web. Anyways, this program is an extension for the Firefox browser that, at least as I understand it, creates random fake search queries to popular search engines so your real searches are buried in a pile of fake data. This is really more about keeping third parties from getting more info about you, not really about eliminating data that is already on your computer. I know Google's Chrome browser has an "Incognito Mode" that lets you browse without keeping track of history and cookies, though I am sure Google keeps a bunch of information if you are using their browser. They say it is "for times when you want to browse in stealth mode, for example, to plan surprises like gifts or birthdays" -- yeah, right, as if the biggest threat to privacy on the web is the risk of ruining a surprise party... "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-18-09 12:14am - 5728 days | #36 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Great answers! I am not surprised that the TV and film question is asking a lot of you. Can't wait to read about your favorite non-porn films, that is if you can ever really finish it. After reading your answer to the bike question it sounds like all your bikes are, or have been, road bikes. I was wondering because I have been mountain biking for about twelve years now and I was surprised to learn you are a cyclist, since I did not know you had spent 4 grand on a bike (though there are still plenty of bikes, and even some frames, that $4K could not buy). Recumbents are still kind of an oddity to me, party because I have seen so few, but probably mostly because I have never ridden one, though it sounds like you are enjoying yours. I still ride the same frame from a GT hardtail I got new in 1997, though I have replaced or upgraded every part on it at least once. I don't have a dream car, but I do have a couple of dream bikes. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-08-09 08:03pm - 5737 days | #93 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Yes, I have made my own share of comments against bush, using terms such as "scary hairy" or even "hairy," though I would argue that it is my own personal experiences (long story that will never be told here) that have shaped my tastes and not "my" generation. I also do not remember seeing shaved models when I found my first porn, and it was definitely not as widespread or as mainstream as it is now, though models were trimmed. Now if you prefer a bush it is considered a fetish, something I am sure older users here never thought would happen. (Who knows, maybe vaginal sex will one day go out of style in porn and it will be niched into a fetish category of its own?) My (and others') use of the word hairy can be considered generational because older fans probably think of this as normal, not something to make a note of or be disgusted by. This is somewhat like how some younger fans might not mind the heavily tattooed or pierced girls but older fans might find them unsightly...but these two specific topics have been covered in other threads. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-08-09 12:19pm - 5737 days | #89 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Lol. Yeah, but so do a lot of other things, and I think posting ages is pointless, since they are in the profiles and I do not think they are relevant to everything we say here. For one thing, personal tastes -- regardless if they are somehow associated with a certain generation or not -- can often supersede the importance of a member's age group. I admit that a lot of my own personal tastes are not necessarily unique to me but more to my generation as a whole, but I also hate, almost more than anything, being lumped into something simply because of my age, and that includes any positive stereotypes as well. I also extend this to other generations besides my own, because I have heard and read too many times about how a person's age, or the year in which they were born, has had so much of a good/bad effect on that person. I respect older users because they might have more experience or knowledge about something than I do, but that doesn't mean they are immune to enjoying something because it is a product of a younger generation, and younger members don't necessarily have to only like things that are supposedly more their style. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-08-09 11:57am - 5737 days | #7 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Even if the government can't get their hands on that information it doesn't mean it can't be sold to the highest bidder or stolen by the craftiest hacker. The fact that so much information is being tracked by so many organizations, public or private, is what scares me. I think we have to always assume our online activity is being monitored or recorded somewhere and somehow, regardless of why. I try to be vague in what I write online and e-mails and visiting a .gov site usually gives me the willies, but maybe this is the point; scare people before they even think of doing something. This was all inevitable; when the Internet was new it was a vast frontier where people could practically think and say whatever that wanted with little interference from Big Brother, so now the powers that be are looking for methods of regulation and control, just as they do with everything else. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-08-09 12:05am - 5738 days | #8 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
That's probably because most of their videos started out as BTS, but they are still fun to watch. Regarding BTS in general, my opinion can vary from liking them to outright hatred and regret. It can be quite interesting to watch your favorite girl be a little open and honest and not always "on" for the camera, but just be herself. But it can also be a disappointment to learn just how crass, dumb, or just plain unattractive someone can be when not performing. More than once I have been thoroughly let down by a BTS feature when I learned just a tad too much about someone I thought I liked, and that was going in with no expectation beyond simple curiosity. Granted, most viewers probably don't want someone's life story either (that's where things usually start to go wrong) but a little personality can go a looong way. Also like pat362 said there can be some interesting bonus material that the studio just cannot advertise, and I am always open to those. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-07-09 01:59pm - 5738 days | #10 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
"At U-Md., XXX-Rated Show Goes On" Well, despite the legislative threats, and protests that those threats are censorship masquerading as a budget issue, the University of Maryland showed clips of "Pirates II" (hey, it is over two hours long). Andrew Harris, the state senator who originally threatened to withhold funds, continued with more words of wisdom: "The taxpayers are paying a high six-figure salary to a lot of people who are supposed to be running that campus," he said. "They need to take control of this situation. If they cannot handle this situation, they cannot handle the type of money that is earmarked for them in the capital budget, either." Hmm...is it really worth all the fuss? Is a single screening, that isn't even school funded, this dangerous to students who choose to see it? Students who are legally adults (though not even old enough to drink, but they do that too)? Lawmakers might not like to think about it, but one day these students will actually be the ones who "take control of this situation." Some of them might even be in his district and choose to vote him out of office. I bet Digital Playground (who produce the "Pirates" series and provided it for free to the theater) is loving all this; every article grabbing people's attention with "XXX" or "Porn On Campus" in the headline is giving this movie more publicity than they could have ever dreamed of. I would not be surprised if sales go up, even if every school in the country banned it. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Oct 09, 2009, 12:07am | |
|
||
| 04-06-09 07:55pm - 5739 days | #61 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
No, because I would feel pretty lucky to have a wife in the first place...but seriously, what kind of husband would I be if I left my spouse over a change in looks? What if the opposite happened, if she got a mastectomy or her looks changed due to an accident and it was all beyond anyone's control? Would I be so utterly cruel and shallow enough to just say "Hey, it's been fun. Goodbye!"? I certainly hope not. I admit that speaking hypothetically about situations which I have never experienced means that I really do not what I would do, but I hope I would look beyond the quickest way out. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-06-09 03:24pm - 5739 days | #59 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Judging by the number, and the sheer length, of the responses here, it is pretty obvious we care about the whole breast issue a great deal, even more so than I would have thought. To exotics4me: I don't think this thread is particularly sexist, at least no more so than any other thread. I believe the guys here feel that women, especially those in porn, get implants to look good for someone else (a primarily male audience, or just males in general), not for themselves. If that makes us sexist, then so be it. Bottom line, women should not be doing anything because of what a guys thinks is beautiful, or even "how it looks to other women and being accepted as beautiful by other women" as TheSquirrel said some women do. As others have touched on above, I think a lot of us dislike fake breasts not simply because that's what we want and our cavemen/1950s opinion is the bottom line, but because we genuinely care about women and we feel that they do it (the implant surgery, as well as a lot of other procedures) for someone else. But if they do it only for themselves, than that is great if it makes them happy, and maybe a lot more women get implants only because they want to and we just have not realized it yet. I prefer women, both in porn and real life, who are reasonably comfortable with what they do and who they are, and yes, that includes looks. I understand that that may be an unrealistically tall order, and also I do not mean say I even begin to understand women, but it can be a lot easier to appreciate a girl's beauty once she appreciates it for herself. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-06-09 02:48pm - 5739 days | #13 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
That's what a lot of people seem to forget; of course the bailouts have increased considerably under Obama. And a lot of the government snooping, spying, tapping, etc. (which this bill also covers) were expanded under Bush, and will probably be even more prevalent with this bill and the new administration. I do worry greatly about the government ever bailing out the media industry (TV, radio, Internet, newspapers) because that puts them dangerously close to controlling what people see, hear, and read. Granted, the vast majority of the media is already controlled by only a few large corporations but they are still separate from the government. If the government wants to control the auto or finance business that's one thing, because those industries do not deal in free speech, but the media does. It seems this bill would allow them to step in where they normally would with a "bailout." "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-06-09 12:46am - 5740 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
But the PATRIOT Act was passed pretty easily, and it took a while for the uproar to build, what little uproar there was. If they can give it a catchy name and spin it as legislation that is somehow necessary for our "security" (isn't that what lawmakers use for everything now?) I would not be too surprised if it was passed. Well if he ever did shut down the Internet we would still have our hard drives and DVDs -- until he shut off the power. At least they cannot shut off our minds...yet. I sure wouldn't mind if they shut down all the cell phone networks though. Where's that bill? I am really hoping this was just a big April Fool's joke since it was introduced on the 1st. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-05-09 11:56pm - 5740 days | #4 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
This may not be very practical, especially in boy-girl material with facials, but I do not think there are enough girls with glasses, though please feel free to dispute this. It is not a fetish for me, but it is something I rarely see, at least outside the big designer sunglasses that girls occasionally wear. I do like the short hair idea. I think long hair is like big breasts though; the majority of viewers prefer it, so that's what they are going to deliver. The thing is when I spot shaved, or just plain short, hair it can be hard to forget (remember Sigourney Weaver? Belladonna?), and on the right girl it can look pretty hot. I also think there are too many altered bodies, tattoos, overly-faked "orgasms," bad costumes, and not enough of the opposite of these. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-03-09 04:48pm - 5742 days | #32 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Yes, I think it is at least 12 months from your last tattoo. Even piercings are not totally safe, especially the riskier genital and tongue ones, though I cannot think of one girl with no piercings whatsoever (including ears). Also, I would imagine the larger breast implants to be a strain on your back after having them for a while, not to mention all the implant-fetish dudes straining their necks just to see them, but that is what they are for anyways. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-03-09 03:08pm - 5742 days | #5 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Hmm, I always wondered why I never suffered from allergies too much... But weren't we told in the early '90s that masturbation was a safe way to avoid STDs? I am pretty sure at least one surgeon general lost a job over that. Of course, now they sell truckloads of Viagra and Cialis to all the old men who can afford it, so maybe getting a prescription of, say, a discounted multi-month subscription to a decent site is not out of the question? Hey, this could even be a new marketing tool for struggling sites. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-03-09 02:59pm - 5742 days | #12 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Lol. Thanks. I believe that the more we would collect the more we would suit our stash to our tastes and not a wider audience. Think about it: your build your collection to a single viewer, you, and it would probably fail as a business model. This is probably why I could not effectively run a site. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-03-09 02:50pm - 5742 days | #9 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Except that their constituent's money was not being spent; the film was provided free by Digital Playground and the admission costs were being used to pay for the theater's staff. The problem was that film was going to be shown on school property -- a public school -- therefore it was sacred ground to the high minded politicians who swung in and saved the day. The theater was also planning on checking IDs and try and keep people from sneaking in, so this wasn't exactly just wide open to the public like a more mainstream film. Maybe I should have posted this in Free Speech and Porn thread instead of here. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-02-09 11:28pm - 5743 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Avast! I should have started this thread a few days ago, but like a lot of porn-in-the-mainstream stories, this quickly took on a life of its own. The University of Maryland was planning to have a screening this Thursday, 2 April, of the multimillion dollar porno blockbuster Pirates 2 -- but of course they did not. Fortunately the state's legislators got involved and drafted an amendment that would hold state funds from any school that screened such "shocking" material. For the UMD, that is more than 400 million dollars, so the screening in question was canceled almost instantaneously. I first heard about the screening, or at least the planning of it, on Tuesday and was pretty happy; believe it or not, college students are adults who can legally view such things, and they had shown "Deep Throat" in 2004. But a part of me also had that nagging feeling that this just would not fly in our country, not outside the handful of places where porn can be produced, and definitely not on a college campus, where "free speech" is only alluded to in history and law classes. My experience in school has led me to believe that for all the tolerance and free speech talk, there is always an opposing viewpoint that, more often than not, is not tolerated, and the single threat of screening a porn film is a good example. And they were not going to simply show it, but preface it with a standard safe sex/anti-porn message from Planned Parenthood. With the uproar I was hearing, the cancellation is pretty par for the course of how our culture overreacts to porn and all the warriors for family values and decency come out and arm themselves to do battle in their next culture war. All problems we now face and the state's politicians saw blocking this as a priority? Sad. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Apr 02, 2009, 11:33pm | |
|
||
| 04-02-09 10:43pm - 5743 days | #47 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
He might have to start a thread just for his own picks. :) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-02-09 10:39pm - 5743 days | #9 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Lol. I think that even if my computer caught fire I would be hesitant to call the fire department. I am a pretty private and paranoid person when it comes to my personal life and, quite frankly, the authorities can go and spend their time solving real problems, whether they are an overrated computer store or an underpaid, but overpowered, government agency (and I am not talking about the local fire department here). I am really not sure how my own collection would score because I would simply ask that people not judge me, whether it be in tastes, size, organization, or simply a total lack of any of these. I understand by some standards (say badandy's) the overall size of my collection might only be a bookshelf compared to his Library of Congress-proportioned stash, and many, if not all, of my tastes might be, well, acquired to the say the least. I would not be surprised at a score in the low to mid 60s, and I do not think 70 or higher would even be possible. My organizational skills would probably destroy Google in a matter of seconds and I probably don't have much to appeal to the common man, or even the common pervert. My collection is not really even totally organized -- and it might never be -- and what is organized is more of how the source site divided it up, but that also includes countless empty folders of girls and scenes I missed or purposely skipped. I think if you did a quick browse through my drives you might believe there was a lot more to certain things than there really is, and likewise there are also a lot of things that are not even close to what you are looking for. Actually if I got a really low score I would feel pretty proud because I have tweaked my collection to my own unique preferences and no one else's. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-02-09 10:11pm - 5743 days | #21 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
This is why I am getting so damn tired of tattoos: because so many people are doing it, it is now "normal," which to me means boring and cliche. I am in my 20s too, but I have become so sick of normal trends that I now fantasize about girls with natural breasts and no tattoos -- that includes all shapes and sizes of butterflies, flowers, lettering, and especially stamps. I am so conditioned to the fake breast look that I pretty much prefer the A to B size range, with an occasional C, just because our society now believes C and above is the norm, whether it be by birth or by surgery. I find it more disgusting that girls will pump their lips full of chemicals, shove silicone in their chest, or just irradiate themselves until they glow, then a girl who, say, admits to liking anal, or something more on the taboo side of things (take your pick here). I don't just see implants as unattractive, but genuinely unsafe and unhealthy, just as much as all the tobacco and alcohol products many models freely admit to consuming. I wonder how we have gotten to this point where the result of completely unnecessary surgery has become such a huge turn-on for so many. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-01-09 09:35pm - 5744 days | #17 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Lol. Yeah, I would love to have the Spice channel in place of the "fair and balanced" staff at Fox who are yelling until they are blue in the face about how values and decency in U.S. are doomed. I saw an interview of Jenna Jameson by Bill O'Reiley and amazingly he didn't yell or threaten her, but he wasn't too satisfied with her answers either -- she didn't feel depressed or abused because of porn, and that probably wasn't the answer he was looking for. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-01-09 09:25pm - 5744 days | #8 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I am not a boob lover -- though I definitely don't hate them! -- but I would think if you really love them then you would give a shit if they were real. For example, I like redheads, but I really don't like it when the hair is dyed, and, like breasts, it is usually quite easy to spot. There is a fetish for pretty much anything our sick and twisted hearts desire, so I am sure there are some out there who like the siliconized tits instead of the real thing. I like shaved girls, such as the ones at ALSScan (who are strongly anti-implant), and I can understand people interpreting that as being unnatural, but I also see it as a far more temporary look, especially when compared to tattoos or surgery. I do happen to have a thing for nipples and areolae though (and only on real breasts), but I think they are overlooked in the quest for "nice" breasts, where numbers are what seem to be most important. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-01-09 09:00pm - 5744 days | #26 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Polaroid has a page on their site with a list of when their instant film products will stop being manufactured, and they are all dated last year, though you can still find the film for sale on the web. They do make a instant digital camera, but that only prints photographs, it doesn't actually develop film. I suspect the cameras will one day become a rare item on ebay -- it they haven't already -- but I think the film is time-sensitive and usually expires within a year or so, though I wouldn't be surprised if another company comes along and acquires the rights to manufacture it. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 03-31-09 11:08pm - 5745 days | #8 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I think porn is like food in the way we can so easily bite off way more than we can chew; I have joined many a site for one month in a vain attempt to download as much in that time frame as possible and always falling far short while still being too cheap to rejoin. I have joined a few sites for multi-month subscriptions and found it to be lower priced (at least in comparing average monthly costs to 1 month deals) and more relaxing; you can take your libido out of overdrive and wade through the content at your leisure instead of trying a month long mad dash to download as much content as possible. Also, if a site teases you with promises of future updates outside your one month, you have even more to look forward to over the course of your subscription. That being said, there are sites (and foods) you only want to try once, and anything over a month just doesn't seem to make sense, especially the smaller sites with few updates. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 03-31-09 10:53pm - 5745 days | #12 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I wonder if it is the energy we expend on our porn habits that keep us from acting up here, or we are all just very relaxed from all the good material we have found, thanks in large part to this site. Maybe we should have a venting/ranting thread just so users can froth at the mouth (not literally though) when their rage builds up. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 03-31-09 10:41pm - 5745 days | #21 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I have always found the VHS format to be creepy even if it is not porn, and especially if you lose the case. I always imagine tapes are something that police would find in a serial killer's basement, or be presented as evidence in a murder trial. Call me crazy, DVDs never come across this way, and of course the snuff-thriller movie "8MM" was about a reel of film and that somehow took it to a whole other level of creepiness. I also find Polaroids creepy, probably for the same reasons as VHS, but I think they have long since stopped manufacturing cameras and now their film as well. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 03-31-09 03:40pm - 5745 days | #4 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I believe that the penalties in this country have little to no "connection" to the seriousness of the crimes. For example, drug possession charges that end with people being imprisoned (a large portion of our prisoners are incarcerated for drug related offenses). So, though 106 mph may be life threatening, there are even lower speeds and a whole slew of other driving habits that are just as life threatening as well. And -- no offense here, it's just my opinion -- I think we take handicap parking disproportionately seriously in comparison to things like driving in the triple digits. I don't even think it has to do with Dillon being famous; I have known people to get tickets for extremely high speeds, not 106 mph, but in the high 90s and subsequently being charged a high fine, so none of this really surprises me. I would suggest, if possible, taking it to court and trying to get it reduced or even voided...though a reduction is probably your best bet. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 03-27-09 12:25am - 5750 days | #43 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Hmm...give your children cell phones or they will be abducted by sex offenders, but give them one with a camera and they will be the sex offenders! At what level does the government stop parenting people's kids? -- apparently whenever they have a conviction against a child, specifically as a sex offender. I would suggest that from now on any parent never photograph their children at any age unless they are fully dressed -- this includes the delivery room! -- or risk appearing before a judge. Seriously, are there no real criminals to prosecute anymore? I guess the justice systems has finally won their "war on crime" and is now just tidying up, such as these teens who, frankly, are simply being teens. I would not be too surprised if this just makes more girls do, or at least want to do, the same thing, instead of scaring them straight or turning them into emotionless prudes. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 1801-1850 of 1958 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 22 | 27 | 36 | Page 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next Page > |
|
