Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: pat362 (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (3575)  |   Threads Started (31)

2651-2700 of 3575 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 10 18 26 34 42 53 Page 54 55 58 61 64 71 72 Next Page >

06-16-10  06:50pm - 5322 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I highly recommend that you take a quick look at prior reviews of sites before joining them, if you haven't done that before. This can help save you some serious money and more importantly prevent annoyance when the content does not appeal to you. If you did then you would have discovered that ass traffic has been dead for a long time since the person responsible for this site and quite a few others moved to the US and he's now directing for Evil Angel.

Firstanalquest is still updating because I'm a recent member and I know that they have new scenes that weren't there when I was a member. Most if not all their models are late teens early 20's only. This site suffers from the same thing that afflicts almost all Eastern European sites. There is no dialogue because the language would not be English. There is very little foreplay because they prefer a more gonzo style. The action is repetitious because they have chosen a gonzo format and they use the same male talent for the scenes. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-16-10  06:36pm - 5322 days #8
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
If you've read my opinion whenever this debate comes up then it won't come as a surprise that I prefer smaller breast. I think "A" cup are amazing. I don't mind large breast as long as they are real but there are certain breast sizes that simply turn me off. It's not even a
debate about implants vs real.

As for Yarina's male friend. All I can say is that it takes all kinds to populate the world and there is always another village looking for their own idiot. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-15-10  07:34pm - 5323 days #179
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by pat362:



Here are the upcoming Universal releases for 2010:

Get him to the Greek: will bomb.
Despicable Me: animated movie which should do well.
Charlie St Cloud: stars Zac Effron likely to bomb
Scott Pilgfrim vs the World: should do well.
Nanny Mcphee returns: should do well.
The adjustement bureau: likely to bomb
My Soul to Take: likely to bomb.
Little Fockers: likely to bomb.


I won't say that Get him to the Greek is a bomb just yet but after almost 2 weeks in theather. It has earned only
39 million(that includes Intl sales) and their original budget was 40 million before marketing. You can add at least another 20 million for P&A and whatever else. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-15-10  07:28pm - 5323 days #178
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


OK, for those who have been disappointed with this year's movie release schedule, there is still hope.

I just read an article saying that 2011 year will be strong.
So all you have to do is hold your breath until 2011 (and maybe saving your pennies to pay for any movie ticket price increases), and then it's BACK TO THE MOVIES!

(Actually, I've been watching a lot of DVDs lately, getting them from redbox, for $1 each (plus tax).

Anyhow, a partial listing of movies coming out in 2011:

"Thor," "Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides," "Captain America: The First Avenger," "Super 8," "Green Lantern," "X-Men: First Class," "Rise of the Apes," "Transformers 3," "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2" and "Cowboys & Aliens."

And 2012 should be even stronger:

"Battleship," "Men in Black 3," the "Spider-Man" reboot, "Star Trek 2," "The Avengers", "Batman 3."


So what you are telling me is that we can look forward to 3 comic book movies. One of a Norse demi-God with a magical Hammer, Captain America whose super power is an indestructible shield, Green Lantern who has a magical ring(rumor has it that the movie is almost all CGI),the latest installement of Pirates of the Caribbean and after that third one which I thought was a nearly unwatchable mess,
a new version of planet of the apes(whomever greenlite this one needs to have his/her head examined), the third Trasnformer movie without the twins and Megan, the lastest installment to Harry Potter. That will leave only 2 movie without any prior connection as far as I know.

I'm really curious about 2012 because we have a new Spider Man in town and he's now a teenager fighting criminals all the while trying to fit in, in High School. Men in Black with aloder Will and Tommy Lee. I guess we won't see Zed since poor Rip broke into a bank last year. The Avengers. I wonder if Uma and Ralph will reprise their memorable roles? Batman 3. I'm possibly one of the few people who thought that Batman 2 was a large piece of turd and that the Joker was not very good character. Battleship which is based on the F..G game. This one is even worse then the Planet of the Apes or Avenger remake.
Who do you have to F..k to get anyone to give money for a movie based on a board game? At least there is a new Star Trek.

We should do try to guess ultimate box office profit for each of these movies before they are released. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-15-10  06:56pm - 5323 days #12
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


I agree with the Capn on this one. I've seen a lot of porn in my life and I think the expectation was that you ask or she offer to give you a hand. Or more. Several videos lead me to believe that the natural outcome to such a beginning would conclude with anal sex.

Seriously though, as long as you're not Catholic, masturbation shouldn't be a hang-up in 2010. It's as natural and normal and common as breathing.


A hand job would have been nice but he could have asked for a BJ. Now that would have been really nice. It's the least she could do after having disturbed him.

P.S: Catholics can masturbate as much as the next guy.
We just have to feel bad about it and ask forgiveness. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-15-10  06:52pm - 5323 days #8
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


If it had worked, I would've been quite surprised.


That is the funniest thing I've seen in a long time.
As anyone ever told you that you are a very bad man?

I wonder what you would have done if it had worked? Long live the Brown Coats.

06-13-10  06:21pm - 5325 days #19
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


I wasn't aware that there was an internet loophole. It must be that the criminal laws under which Max was convicted were old enough that they only covered physical things like books and DVDs. Interesting...


There are no current internet laws that prevent anyone from vieweing any of max's movies and that includes his European versions. Max would never have been accused if he was a purely internet producer. His crime was that the movies were shipped to a State that has certain laws about
the content. Seymore Butts was also accused because of something that was shipped to Florida. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-13-10  06:17pm - 5325 days #18
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


My own death is one of the last things I can have control over. If I ever get a daignosis of terminal whatever I'll take matters into my own hands. The sad thing is that any choice I can make is limited due to right-wing fundies. The choices are difficult for me and messy for those left behind. I'd far rather if there was a Dr. Kevorkian willing to make it more simple and humane.

Fuck I hate fundamentalists...


Here is the main problem with opening this pandora's box.
If you allow euthanasia for people with terminally diseases
then it's only a question of time until someone mentions people that aren't terminal but may suffer greatly and then somehow it's now people that have a serious physical disability that will affect their entire life.

In that possible future, you know what might. and I do stress, might happen. No Steve Hawkins would be allowed to live because it's too cruel and inhumane of us to make a man suffer what he suffers daily.

How long before we think the suffering elderly should be put to sleep?

As it currently stands many terminally ill people are allowed to die on their own terms. It's called morphine. Doctors are quite aware that a high enough does will kill the patient and yet they still prescribe it. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-12-10  10:08am - 5327 days #174
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


But what the heck do they mean by negative costs?


But I don't know what the heck they mean by negative costs. Why can't they explain their terminology at the bottom of the article, so the outside reader can understand what the f_ they are writing about?

Negative costs must refer to production costs. But why they call it negative costs, and then talk about production costs, makes it seem confusing.

Then again, Hollywood is famous for their tricky accounting, where they hide costs and profits from everyone except the insiders, anyway.


Negative cost is simply the cost of producing and shooting a movie. I assume they use that term because it's in fact a loss to the studios until the movie is released and then it either becomes a bigger loss or it's a money maker.

A good example of negative cost being insignificant when compared to the P & A cost would be The Blair Witch Project. It had a negative cost of about 35,000$ in the beginning which somehow climbed to almost 750,000$. The studio spent about 25 millions to market the movie. It made almost 250 millions dollars so I don't think they are crying about the investment.

Hollywood is renowned for their ability to play with the profit a movie makes. It's very common for a movie that made hundreds of millions to somehow be a loss. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-12-10  09:44am - 5327 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
What kind of porn you like? How much you are willing to pay?

The most important thing about a trial is to remember to cancel within a short amount of time. You won't lose access to the site but you won't get caught with a full membership because you forgot that you had a 3 day trial and tried to cancel on day 4. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-11-10  06:49pm - 5327 days #171
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:



But seriously, who the hell needs a 152" physical display in their home anyway? There are more than enough projectors out there to fit a requirement for 150+" of display,

Or you just love new toys that really have no purpose other than to say to rest of the world "Hey, look at me! I'm rich and you're not, you fuckers! Ha ha ha!" Kinda reminds of Lexus' recent LFA supercar[/url], which costs a cool $350,000 (and that's just the base price), and apparently requires prospective buyers be approved before the company will sell you one, meaning just because you have the money doesn't mean you can own one.


Although a projector is a great piece of technology. The quality of the image does not compare to what a screen can offer.

If your a well known sports, TV, Movie, Music, Fashion, ect personality who gets paid unbelievable amounts of money then I guess 100,000$ is a small amount of money to you. The fact that you have no problem spending it on a TV that is the size of your wall instead of helping people in need simply makes you a rich A..hole. Who knows, if I was so rich that 100,000$ TV wasn't even an issue maybe I'd be as big an A..hole. I'm likely never going to find out, but if I do then I hope I can find something more productive to do with that kind of money. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-10-10  06:39pm - 5328 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
It sounds like a weird film and what is described looks familiar. Could we have the name of one of the females? Long live the Brown Coats.

06-10-10  02:48pm - 5329 days #8
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:



Max was convicted on transporting and shipping the 'obscenity' in question, not actually producing it, which I doubt would have gotten him imprisoned (though during the Bush II years I really would not have been that surprised). Saying something is one thing, and it's usually protected--that pesky 1st Amendment gets in the way--but transportation is a whole other issue, and in Max's case it was sadly a crime.

I don't think he was ever a specific target of the DOJ or anyone in the Bush II White House from the very beginning of the first term--maybe just in the backs of their minds--but once they pulled that Obscenity Prosecution Task Force out of their ass in 2005 they were probably looking for the more blatantly hardcore of the hardcore pornographers to charge and Max fit the bill. Playboy he is (was?) not!


The funny thing is that it was an undercover FBI agent that ordered the Max video's to be shipped to Florida. That smells of entrapment but like you said. Once the Government wants you. They can bend the law to get you.

I actually think that he was a target because he was the easiest one to go after. I was a big fan of Max's older material but what he produced in the last few years was not my idea of good porn. He did push a lot of boundaries and because of what he did. His head stuck above everyone elses when it came to being pretty easy to sway a jury. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-09-10  07:51pm - 5329 days #167
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:



The trailer that I saw had Jonah (played by Josh Brolin) facing 4 or 5 armed men, or maybe even more than 5 men. Jonah is on a horse. Will he be able to draw fast enough to outshoot all the men, or will he be shot dead along with some of his opponents?

I was amazed when Jonah uncovered two gatling guns that were slung on the sides of his horse, and the gatling guns started blazing away, cutting down the opponents.

What amazed me the most was that the horse started moving when the gatling guns began to fire, so that the gatling guns were able to cut down all the opponents. Did the horse have supernatural intelligence that it was able to consciously aim the gatling guns at the "bad" men? Or was the horse being controlled by Jonah while the gatling guns were blazing away? Any normal horse, with two gatling guns blazing away at its sides, would have reared and plunged and screamed and gone crazy. But that was one special horse, I figured.




The fact that you wondered about that in the trailer does not bode well for it's future box office take if more people think like you do. I saw the trailer and I thought the same thing so I'm with you on the wait for the DVD. I would add that this is the type of movie that should never have been made except for DVD. This could make a killing on DVD but I don't think it will ever make it's money back at the box office. They had a budget of 80-100 millions.
That doesn't include marketing and so forth. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-09-10  07:43pm - 5329 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I think that Max has only 2 choices. He can either move to Europe where the laws that found him guilty don't exist or he can choose to do only internet content. I favor the later since moving to Europe is one hell of a move when you've lived your entire life in the US. Don't forget that he wasn't found guilty of producing offensive movies but of shipping them to a State that did. I know that it's more a case of entrapment because of how it all went down but the fact remains that he was found guilty and sentenced to prison. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-09-10  07:37pm - 5329 days #15
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I'm affraid the 2 guys driving along and seeing a good looking girl whom they entice to have sex scenario is not one that I'm able to believe anymore because the new 2257 regulations require the studio have all the models info on file. That kind of kills the fantasy for me. If anyone still can believe in them than that's great for you guys.

There may be more than 2 but the best ones are Ed Powers in the US and Pierre Woodman in Europe. Both of these men have mastered the art of getting girls to do porn or at least to think about it. Ed only showed scenes where the girl did something wherehas Pierre will sometime show only the interview.

I can't speak on the same model appearing twice on Pierre shoot since I don't know which girl you are talking about but I will say that I have seen the same girl comeback later on after having done only the interview the first time and now she chooses to do hardcore and some of them look significantly different from one scene to the next. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-08-10  06:53pm - 5330 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by mantas:


Hell no! That would be a huge turn on. One of my biggest fantasies is for me to stumble upon a video of one of my ex girlfriends doing porn. The nastier and more depraved the better.


Would it be a turn on if it was your current girlfriend and couple of your budies mentioned they thought she was great getting in that movie where she F..d 3 guys? Long live the Brown Coats.

06-08-10  06:47pm - 5330 days #12
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Once upon a time in the West and Breakheart Pass. Both were with Charles Bronson. Most Westerns with Audie Murphy
but Gunsmoke is my favorite. Hang Em High with Clint. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-07-10  03:30pm - 5332 days #8
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I'm different. When I find hardcore clips of a favorite softcore model, I watch them, but I like the model less.
The mind is a curious thing to figure.


It depends on the level of hardcore for me. There have been a couple of softcore models that went really hardcore in a very short time and I did watch there stuff at first but I also enjoyed her less. I guess you could say that I can't be pleased. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-07-10  03:27pm - 5332 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I don't have any clue and I'll add my voice to your call.
Where can you find older porn on the net? It has to be late 70 and 80's stuff only. I don't know why more movies aren't being remastered. There has to be money to be made in selling a remastered classic porn movie. It has to be the original unedited version. That last one may be the biggest sticking point. Some of the subject matters were a little tabou and some were very tabou. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-07-10  03:20pm - 5332 days #75
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by kkman112:


Here the "PU Enforcers" tend to give us twenty lashes if we are mean to anyone...



20 lashes. You're lucky. The last time I was mean they took me to the back shed and started beating me with the ugly stick but they had to stop because I was already there.

On a serious note. It is true that this forum is pretty rare in the way we deal with each other. The name calling is almost never seen and we tend to remain cicil even when we have a serious disagreement of opinion. We're like the UN of porn. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-06-10  06:14pm - 5332 days #6
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
There have been some performers that have gotten better with time and there are those that I have rediscovered but I've never had one that I'd consider a sleeper.

I sometime discover hardcore scenes from performers that I thought only did softcore or G/G content. Now those are always a pleasant suprise. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-05-10  01:59pm - 5334 days #21
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Oh, yes! I love that film; great pacing and score, all with tons of nudity and sex (and apparently not simulated either)!


The sex scenes were not simulated. There was a lot of controversy because of that during and after filming. I
don't consider it a non-porn erotic film because it is only one scene, but the Chloe Sevigny BJ in Brown Bunny is still the most shocking thing that a well known actress has done in a motion picture. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-04-10  03:22pm - 5335 days #14
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by mbaya:


HI BGR,
I love Liv Tyler and want to know more about Stealing Beauty. How explicit does it get? In the description on Amazon it only mentions topless.


Unless my memory fails me. She only does a topless scene but you laos get Rachel Weiss to do one as well. I would not consider this an erotic movie in any standard. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-01-10  07:04pm - 5337 days #36
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by markfx:


I might understand some instances of both men and women having private relations with animals. Then I guess a minority of those might consent to public displays including filming as part and parcel of their own evolving libido.
But, I would guess most are involved due to financial and/or psychological pressure.

It's not for me and I don't want a close family member getting into that business.


I suspect that the number of people willing to perform in beastiality films is rather small. The only advantage I can see is that the money might be really good since it is a very rare fetish. I don't know if there is as large a market for guys to have sex with animals as much as there is for women having sex with various animals. I've seen at least one well known female pornstar do scat porn in her career so it's possible that having a dog lick you is a step above eating fecal matter. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-01-10  06:58pm - 5337 days #57
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
One of my main life philosphy is to try to always be nice even when people aren't nice. It's not always easy and sometime it's downright hard but at the end of the day. The fact that I was nice throught my day makes me feel good and I also don't agonize about a certain situation where I think I might have said or done the wrong thing to someone.

Another reason is that I've found that when I'm nice to people that aren't necessarily nice. It annoys them and drives them nuts and that makes me feel good. It's bad of me but those people only have to change their attitude and they won't find me annoying....Well at least less annoying. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-01-10  06:47pm - 5337 days #8
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
It is a sad state of affair when a reputable business that pays taxes and employs a significant amount of people is forced to leave the Country to avoid likely future legal problems.

How many Australian models did Abby hire over the last decade? How many more might have made some money by appearing on the site. Now all those possible revenues will be spent on European models or at least for the most part.

Does this mean that Abby will no longer shoot any content in Australia? Long live the Brown Coats.

05-31-10  07:25pm - 5338 days #165
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by messmer:


Try Box Office Mojo for really detailed information on any movie. They usually got everything from production cost to listing of a movie's daily,weekly,monthly take. Plus on how many screens it is playing etc. etc. Also a list of the all time biggest money makers (today's data and data adjusted for inflation). Good source if you are a movie buff.


Thanks messmer. They do have some very good info. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-31-10  07:23pm - 5338 days #14
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


It would actually be pretty easy to get more details in this age where virtually every single porn babe - especially the young up-and-coming ones - are all into "Follow Me On Twitter" - and many of them would have no problem sharing info about how much the average girl gets for various types of scenes.

If you twitter-friend one of these babes, I bet you would get all kind of info if you asked.


The problem is that you can't be sure that one girl won't lie about another girls numbers and vice versa. The only way to know for sure is to get the people that produce porn to give numbers but that won't happen because they don't want one girl to know how much they paid another girl.

The only girls whose salary can be guessed with a certain amount of accuracy are contract stars because they have only one salary which is not based on trhe number of scenes or movies they do per year. The other girls income is based on the sexual act they are willing to perform and the number of scene they will do. Add their level of popularity and the exclusivity of the sexual act they are willing to perform. I'd say that a very popular actress that has been in the biz for a few months to a year and chooses to do an anal scene is likely to get a large paycheck for that one scene. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-30-10  07:01pm - 5339 days #163
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by messmer:


Don't forget that many of the movies you quoted have a world wide release as well. Robin Hood, for instance, despite the fact that it is doing poorly in North America is doing quite well world-wide with an overseas take (Saturday, May 29) of $154,600,000 or 65.1% of the total take. (Box Office Mojo). So that one should recover its costs. Will it make a profit? With the huge promotional costs involved only time will tell.


I didn't mention Overseas sales because I couldn't find any data on it. I suspect that Oversea sales are larger than North American ones simply because there is more population. Mind you if a movie does poorly in NA than it's also likely to do poorly Overseas and you have to deduct the cost of translation into other languages when you send movies Overseas.

I think Oversea sales are the reasons why some sequels get done because ther hav3 been a few movies that didn't do very well here but somehow got green lit for a sequel. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-30-10  06:53pm - 5339 days #18
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I would argue that none of us actually watch true lesbian porn, but more accurately girl-girl porn. I would bet many lesbians would not be as interested or as turned on as we are by the 'lesbian' porn we enjoy, given that it's made by guys for guys with bisexual or very open-minded heterosexual women as the actresses. I remember watching a little bit of lesbian porn (it was specifically made for lesbians by a lesbian cast and crew) and thinking something like "This is boring! When are they going to start really going at it? And what's with all the kissing?" Clearly I was not part of the target audience.

I think the girl-girl/'lesbian' material we guys like is not really homosexual and that's why most guys are comfortable watching it. We view it as just another porn video because we are ogling the opposite sex, if only a few more of them in the same place at the same time--convenient! Add in the factor that you have seen some of the actresses in guy-girl videos as well and you realize it's just horny guy fantasy material, not exactly what any lesbian would care to see.


I own plenty of dvd's from Girlfriend films and unless I'm mistaken. They are all directed by lesbians. The director of some of them sometimes does cameos. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-30-10  09:00am - 5340 days #12
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


You make a very persuasive argument, Pat....But the fact is, the risk of disease amoungst porn stars directly related to on-job filming/taping is so negligible it's a non-issue. A little research on the matter should bare me out. Its also common knowledge that extremely protective measures are taken, the most positive of which is ongoing testing for those in the business. The ones you hear about that do contract sexually transmitted disease are patently the result of outside activity....case in point: John Holmes.


You are probably right about pornstars catching STD's from someone not in the biz, but they will still transmit it to their partners that are in the biz. I don't care where the guy or girl got herpes because that's not important. The fact remains that he or she is now a carrier and may infect all future partners who will then infect someone else and so on. Using a condom is not a foolproof way to prevent the transmission of an STD but it's certainly better than nothing. If what I've read was true than most of the pornstars have had at least one or more STD in their career. Add the fact that their are some new strands of STD's that are harder to treat.

I'd rather the Government didn't get involved because that is sure to be a clusterfuck of galactic proportion. The problem is that nobody is willing to do it from the inside. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-30-10  08:45am - 5340 days #30
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I'd say that the available talent pool for women willing to do porn and hardcore porn is even smaller must be very small. I could be wrong but unless you've been in the biz for many years then starting porn at 40 let alone 50 is not likely to be very high on your choice of possible careers. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-29-10  06:12pm - 5340 days #10
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I've never made it a secret that I think condoms should be mandatory in any penetration. I appreciate that many people prefer the bareback look but I don't care either way and I think the health and safety of someone I pay money to see have sex should come ahead of my pleasure.
I don't want to read about all the cases of herpes, vaginal & anal warts, syphilis, AIDS and all the others.
Those kind of stories make me feel both dirty and guilty because a human being got sick and may die because I wanted to get off. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-29-10  06:08pm - 5340 days #9
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by pinkerton:


The only unprotected sex porn that's safe for the performers are those with husband-wife/boyfriend-girlfriend who stay faithful. Maybe that's the future of safe porn?


I believe the key word in your statement is faithfull and I don't think that faithfullness is often used with porn performers. For argument sake, I will agree that there is a married couple that is both faithfull and have great sex that someone films. How many scenes would you watch before you'd get tired of seeing them both have sex? Long live the Brown Coats.

05-29-10  06:01pm - 5340 days #10
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


The days of the six figure porn starlet sort of went by the wayside with the current recession. Only the top stars make that kind of money now. Most girls who regularly appear in the porn biz probably only make in the mid five figures now unless they do a lot of touring or have enough business savvy to produce and market their own content.


I agree with you that the six figure star is a thing of the past and I'd add that most porn girls never make the kind of money being mentioned. Yes, on paper that's true but at the end of the year. I don't think most of them have got more than rent money regardless of the 100,000$ claim. For one thing the girls have to pay their agents and that means probaly 20% or more. They probably live a lifestyle that is not conclusive to saving your money. Many of them have a drug and alcohol problem and that gets expensive real fast. Some have a suitcase pimp in the background who lives of her money. Many live in LA and unless I'm mistaken. Rent must be pretty high. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-29-10  05:51pm - 5340 days #13
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by messmer:


Strange how two people can look at the subject so differently, Pat. I have always looked at Trannies as girls by nature, who knew from a very early age that they were in a man's body by mistake but who haven't quite taken that final step yet, so I have no problems seeing them with a man. My problem is when this "girl" is made to fuck the guy, then it becomes unnatural for me. As to the rest of your remarks, I completely agree with you about the "discomfort" factor when it comes to gay material (excluding Lesbians). However I will join the others and say reviews of gay sites or participation by more gays in this forum would certainly not be frowned upon by anyone here. Everyone welcome!


I consider transexuals more guys than girls because of the penis. You are concept may be the more accurate but for me, a person with a dick is a guy regardardless that they have breast and think of themselves as girls in the making.

For that reason. I can't watch a transexual being screwed by a guy or a girl but enjoy watching them screw a girl. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-29-10  11:28am - 5341 days #157
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Spending $30 million to advertise a $10 million movie ($10 million for production cost) seems ridiculous to me. I'm not in the business, but there's got to be a way to release low-budget movies less expensively, where the advertising costs are more in line with the production costs.


I agree with you but your assumption is that the people responsible for making movies have to be inteligent. I'm affraid that isn't always the case. Macgruber was made by Universal and this is not a very good year for Universal.
Here are the box office takes versus production cost.

Leap Year: 25 millions vs 19 millions
The wolfman: 61.9 millions vs 150 millions
Green zone: 35 millions vs 100 millions
Repo Men: 13.8 millions VS 32 millions
Robin Hood: 82 millions vs 200 millions
MacGruber: 6.9 millions vs 10 millions

None of these movies have made a profit but Leap Year and MacGruber still win because they didn't lose as much as the others. I looked at the upcoming stuff and Universal is going to be in serious trouble by the end of 2010.

Here are the upcoming Universal releases for 2010:

Get him to the Greek: will bomb.
Despicable Me: animated movie which should do well.
Charlie St Cloud: stars Zac Effron likely to bomb
Scott Pilgfrim vs the World: should do well.
Nanny Mcphee returns: should do well.
The adjustement bureau: likely to bomb
My Soul to Take: likely to bomb.
Little Fockers: likely to bomb. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-29-10  10:37am - 5341 days #44
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
You could try on adt: http://www.adultdvdtalk.com/. This is a mostly all porn forum but they get a lot of traffic.
I'd say that yahoo would be a good place as well. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-28-10  08:20pm - 5341 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:



Actually, a fair number of euro pornstars can be found occasionally on european escort sites and it's not uncommon for American starlets to head over to the other side of the pond on occasion to do the same. Actually, if I had the money and desire, I'd probably be more tempted to go with a porn star hookup as opposed to some call girl because you know what your getting, she knows how to act and they get tested for diseases pretty regularly so that's also in your favor.


If what I've read is true and I personaly believe it is. Many well known European pornstars can be had and quite a few of them for ridiculously small amounts.

I don't know if I agree with you on the "she knows how to act". It's quite possible that many of them just want to make money and think that because the guy paid to fuck them. The fact that they are pornstars should be more important than to satisfy the guy.

I have to disagree about the part where they get tested for diseases. Yes, they do but you are still going to have sex with a prostitute so I don't think the fact that they got tested a few weeks ago will be in their favor since you might be her third customer of the day. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-28-10  08:10pm - 5341 days #155
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I saw Prince of Persia tonight and I enjoyed it. Here is the Rotten Tomatoes consensus:

"It doesn't offer much in the way of substance, but Prince of Persia is a suitably entertaining swashbuckler -- and a substantial improvement over most video game adaptations".

That's how I'd sum up the movie. I never played the game but I did see a few reviews that showed the style of play in the movie. Jake is alright. I know some critics have said that he was miscasted in the role but I didn't think so. I not once looked at my watch and for a movie that is just shy of 2hrs, that is pretty good. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-28-10  08:00pm - 5341 days #154
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Why does it have to make at least $50 million to make a profit if it only cost $10 million to make? Do you have a simple explanation of how to calculate the return on a movie? I understand there can be many costs to a movie beyond the simple production costs (marketing would be one additional cost), but it doesn't sound reasonable that a $10 million movie would require $50 million in box office to break even.


The marketing cost is why 50 million is the number for the movie to show a profit or at least a box office profit. I won't touch future DVd sales. The movie was released in over 2500 theathers and print ads, TV spots and all the other advertising that was done for the movie are likely to cost 30 million. The movie made 4.1 million on the first weekend but only about 3 went back to the studio since 4.1 millions is box office take before theater have deducted their profit. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-28-10  07:47pm - 5341 days #6
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I don't consider myself to be homophobic but I won't join a site that has 2 guys kissing and fucking. I have nothing agsinst it but it won't do anything for me except make me feel uncomfortable. I won't watch Brokeback Mountain for that same reason. I would join a site that has transexuals with girls but not transexuals with guys. I'm not going to get into an argument of what a transexual really is because it's not relevant since I consider them to be a man with breast.

I invite anyone to join this site and offer a review of which ever site they enjoy. I think the more the merrier. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-27-10  06:39pm - 5342 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I'm not completely sure where you are going with your statement. Are you looking for a discussion on different escort services that employ pornstars in their stables or is it something else?

Are you curious about our views on escort/dating services in general? I know I would never use one because It's not my thing. I equal escort to prostitution. In my book there is no difference. An escort is just another word like using watersports instead of golden showers. Escort just sounds better.

I do believe that quite a few pornstars have started escorting in the last few years. Whether that was always the case and I simply never heard about it or if it's a result of the problems facing the porn industry. The fact remains that you can find many agencies advertising pornstars on their site. I suspect some of them are bait and switch types but most must be legit. I think that a pornstar that escorts on the side should be banned from performing for a couple of months. The health risks is just too great. Once you accept to have sex for money with a complete stranger than how long before you accept lots of money to have unprotected sex with that stranger? Long live the Brown Coats.

05-27-10  06:18pm - 5342 days #151
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:



Why they keep making SNL sketches into films is beyond me. The actors in non-sketch film roles can do reasonably well but wearing their character out for an hour and a half is too much.


I don't know why they keep making them? I read that Macgruber cost about 10 million dollars to make & another it will have to make at least 50 million to make profit. With a 4.1 million opening weekend and not a very good word of mouth. Maybe this will be the movie that kills every other future possibility of SNL sketch to movie. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-26-10  06:57pm - 5343 days #149
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I haven't seen MacGruber. Maybe I will see it on DVD.
The critics gave it a poor grade, for what that's worth. Critics opinions don't count very much with me.
But the movie has bombed. $4 million for its debut weekend.
So it will probably last a couple of weeks at the box office, then reappear on DVD sometime later.
Val Kilmer and Ryan Phillipe are in the movie, but that didn't save it from bombing.
Kilmer and Phillipe used to be hot, but it's been a while since either was in a hit movie.


I usually look at Rotten Tomatoes results since this is an hodgepodge of different reviews all mixed together to give you a better sampling . MacGruber only got 47% so this is pretty much the kiss of death for box office money. It
migh have had a chnace if it had been released during a quieter time than summer. Then again, you have to wonder about the level of inteligence for a studio exec to give the go ahead for a movie based on a skit that usually lasts a couple of minutes and always ends with the main character exploding.

Here is Rotten Tomatoes little summary of MacGruber:

"It too often mistakes shock value for real humor, but MacGruber is better than many SNL films -- and better than it probably should be". Long live the Brown Coats.

05-26-10  06:48pm - 5343 days #148
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Maybe this guy would have better luck trying to rob a gas station?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<




Wash. police: 'Drugstore Cowboy' author busted (AP)
Source: AP 4 hours, 1 minute ago


REDMOND, Wash. - Police in Washington state say the man who wrote "Drugstore Cowboy" has been arrested in yet another pharmacy robbery.

James Fogle was arrested with another man Tuesday night after they allegedly tied up employees at a pharmacy in Redmond, east of Seattle. The Seattle Times reports Fogle will be arraigned Thursday on a charge of first-degree armed robbery.

Fogle has spent much of his adult life in prison, which is where he wrote "Drugstore Cowboy." Filmmaker Gus Van Sant turned the novel into the acclaimed 1989 film starring Matt Dillon. The work was loosely based on Fogle's life robbing pharmacies to feed his addictions.

Redmond police spokesman Jim Bove says robbing pharmacies "is probably the only thing he knows."

___

Information from: The Seattle Times, http://www.seattletimes.com
More on: Matt Dillon


This begs the question. Why is this guy still out? How many time should he be arrested before someone says no more? I knew the movie's charatcter was based on this guy and frankly Matt Dillion played him very well. All the characters were pathetic in the movie but it's worse when the real guy is even more pathetic. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-26-10  06:45pm - 5343 days #32
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by purduerachel:


i got interested in this topic with so many celebrities coming out saying they are addicted to sex. i wanted to explore that.



I think the main reasons why so many celebrities have come out as sex addicts is because they are hoping to save serious money during the inevitable divorce. They figure that having their conditions diagnozed has a disease is a possible path to get away with it. What the hell it's worked for drug addict& alcoholics. How many celebrities have gotten off easy because they claimed somekind of addiction? Lindsay comes to mind at the moment.

There was an article in Newsweek recently that made a correlation between addiction to tanning beds & substance abuse. It basically said that people that are addicted to tanning beds are more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol.
How long before stars come out and use the tanning booth addiction excuse for why they were caught with cocaine?

I have a bigger curiosity about celebrities. Why are so many of them making sex tapes? Why are so many of them that did do one but didn't ever want it released not destroy the damn thing? Now that could be an interesting study. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-26-10  03:47pm - 5343 days #144
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


$20 adult ticket price to see Shrek 4 at an IMAX theater in New York City? The $20 price was posted online this Wednesday, but then the price was dropped to $17 or $19.

These are IMAX theaters, in New York City, for a 3-D movie.

But $20? Or even $17-$19?

I'm waiting to see Shrek 4 on DVD. At Redbox, you can rent DVDs for $1 (not including tax).


I read an article this past weekend where the theater owners or studios said that the 20$ ticket price was a misunderstanding and that the prices would bew more like 16-17$. Frankly 16$ is still too much money for a movie.
Why should I have to pay that kind of money so that Avatar can claim to have made a BILLION DOLLARS at the box office.

Now with every movie being made in 3D because they can charge more because of the glasses(which you can't keep) and the 3D experience. Are we going to see a decline in moviegoers? I know that I dislike paying 12$ for the regular theather and 14$ for 3D. I'll be even more reticent to go experience new films. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-26-10  03:39pm - 5344 days #143
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


Good to hear. Sometimes a sequel can ruin the story.


Whether they planned it that way or they simply luck in. There is almost no story in Iron Man 2 so no way could it ruin Iron Man 1. It's basically a series of action scenes all played in a specific sequence culminating in a no real
surprise ending. One of the main plot point has to do with Tony Stark's health(I won't give anything else away) but if you had walked out of the theater for a minute here and there then you wouldn't know it. Long live the Brown Coats.

2651-2700 of 3575 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 10 18 26 34 42 53 Page 54 55 58 61 64 71 72 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.08 seconds.