Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: pat362 (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (3575)  |   Threads Started (31)

3151-3200 of 3575 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 12 22 32 42 52 63 Page 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 Next Page >

07-18-09  06:43am - 5636 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Jay G:


While anybody can sue for anything, certainly, (Texas Beef Producers Vs. Opera, for example), there certainly doesn't seem to be any true legal grounds for suing a review site for "blacklisting."

I don't see any legal grounds that Best Porn is forced to link to ANY site except sites it chooses.

While slander is a legal argument, it is hard to use against someone using their free speech power to review something, and there definately is no implied right by any website to be linked to a review site.


Lets say for argument sake that a site does not have any legal rights to sue TBP or PU. It doesn't mean that it can't do it anyway. Regardless that the case is sure to get thrown out of court. It would still require the use of a lawyer or law firm to handle the case. Lawyers cost a lot of money. It's far better to safe and aaoid the possibility. This is a Country in which a women was awarded 4 million dollars because she spilled a Mcdonald coffee on herself while driving. The fact that you aren't allowed to eat while drving didn't sop this case from going to trial. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-15-09  06:55pm - 5638 days #48
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
My taste in porn goes from one extreme to the next. I can enjoy the hard stuff one minute and turn right back and enjoy just as much some nice soft porn. Of course my idea of hard does not include the use of face slapping, blowjob gagging, spitting, chocking, calling the performer deregatory names.

I much prefer the sex to be a balance between hard and soft. There aren't many scenes like that anymore. I find that today's hard porn exist more because the people making them simply have no talent and trash is easier to make than quality.

I'd compare it to swearing in comedy. It's easy to get a laugh when you swear, but only the great comedians can get them without ever using a swear word. Anyone can make gonzo porn and it sells but only the greta directors makes movies that we will talk about in a decade. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-13-09  06:37pm - 5640 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
If a movie contains an average of 5 scenes and retails for 20$ then each scene comes to 4$ each. Most scene are at least 15-20 minutes.
Now why anyone would want a 5 minutes clip is beyond me, but I guess if I use my above calculation then 5 min is 1$, 10min is 2$ and 20 min is 4$. That would seem like a fair price but the quality has to be there. Afterall a 20$ dvd is still dvd quality while many clips
might not be remotely close to that in quality. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-13-09  06:27pm - 5640 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


"Pornography is vulgar, candid, cynical, obscene depiction of sexual acts, pursuing no other goal, the explicit demonstration of genitals, unethical elements of the sexual act, sexual perversions, realistic sketches that do not meet moral criteria and offend honour and dignity of the human by inciting low instincts."



But those are the best laws. You certainly don't want a logical well worded law that would make it next to impossbile to know who's guilty and who isn't. This is the kind of law meant to scare everyone because the door is wide open to interpretation. If you live in Ukraine and own porn movies at this moment. Aren't you affraid that one of your neighbors who's pissed at you calls the police and rats you out. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-12-09  09:15am - 5642 days #95
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Megan Fox, the hottie from the Transformers movies, stars in Jennifer's Body (2009), to be released 18 September 2009 (USA). A newly possessed cheerleader (Megan Fox) turns into a killer who specializes in offing her male classmates. Can her best friend put an end to the horror? Stars two great looking female leads, Megan Fox and Amanda Seyfried (the female lead of last year's Mamma Mia). Rated R for sexuality, bloody violence, language and brief drug use. This is one movie I wouldn't mind seeing rated XXX, because both girls are lovely, but I doubt we'll be seeing much naked flesh from either one of them, because they are both rising stars, so why would they do nudity? It's not like they are porn stars.


I've seen the preview and some stills from the movie so I know that we will at least get some serious partial nudity
from Megan. Whether we get actual nudity is less likely.

I agree that both actresses are popular at the moment so nudity is not necessary. Of course an actress sometime does nudity so that she can get more mature roles. Megan is 23 and Amanda is 24. Both have been stuck in more or less teenager roles for the last couple of years. I wouldn't mind a decent nude scene but I'll be surprise of there are any on this movie. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-09-09  06:21pm - 5644 days #66
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I have seen the movies in question and frankly the Government is going to have hard time with this case. I don't know if they will decide to drop the charges before it goes to court but knowing how Governments usually think. I suspet they won't. If they think that a girl blowing a milk like substance out of her ass is obscene then clearly they have never seen a girl blow a couple of loads of sperm into a bowl and swallow it. I'll take the milk like substance any day. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-07-09  06:38pm - 5646 days #16
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by jd1961:


There is no niche.

I remember one of my first girlfriends way back in the 1980's(!). I was at her apartment one night, and she pulled out a stash of porn tapes, much the same as I had! Same stuff. Believe it or not, women like men that act like men, and do things that men do, and that includes sexuality. So why would they be interested in porn where men act effeminate? Where's the sense in that?

BTW, we had female reviewers here, but I think they felt a bit intimidated.


That's pretty cool that your girlfriend had a similar porn collection as you, but that was in the 80's so at least part of the stuff might have been from the 70's as well.
That was before the onslaught of gonzo. I don't know how many women would find what passes for porn today to be as appealing. Upside down anal pile driving while spitting in the girls face is not likely to be at the top of most womens list of enjoyable porn scene. I suspect that a lot of todays porn is just not catered to women. It's made by men for men. Even the porn that is supposedely produced/directed by women often has a male feel to it.

I don't want to say that companies use female director as a gimmick, but I guess I am implying it. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-07-09  06:30pm - 5646 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Atrapat is correct. This is without a doubt Rod Fontana. I have to concur with turboshaft as well. Not all male pornstars are made the same. Unless you watch lesbian porn or POV stuff than the male talent is at least half of the group on screen. I much prefer porn with a story so the male talent is important to me. If I think the guy is an idiot than I'm going to have a hard time with the scene regardless that the girl is super hot. I miss the male stars from the hey days of porn. THese guys made it with more than just their dicks. Many of todays guys couldn't act themselves out of a box and it often makes the scene a little limp. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-07-09  06:22pm - 5646 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Congratulation Mbaya on making it through the one year mark. I agree with your criticism of reviews. I think that most if us are guilty of that crime. I know that I sometime want to write more but I just don't have the skill to express it. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-02-09  07:27pm - 5651 days #93
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
The only thing that I could complain about the Harry Potter movie is that they are too short. I understand that movie lengths are very important for theater box office returns, but this is where you have a big screen version and then a DVD version. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-01-09  06:39pm - 5652 days #91
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I don't know if it sounds dorky or not but I'm really anxious for the next Harry Potter. It's already 6 months overdue since it was suppose to come out November 08. Same thing for Star Trek which was pushed to this year. I think Harry Poter is the only summer movie that I'm still waiting for. All the other movies that appeal to me aren't scheduled for release until September and onward. I'm sure the summer box office results will be great this year but it won't be because of me. I have only seen Star Trek out of the anticipated big summer movies and I'm going to go see Transformers. The rest don't seem worth the 12$ it would cost me. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-01-09  08:57am - 5653 days #89
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I saw Flash Gordon serials (as a child), and thought they were great, exciting serials. I seem to remember Buster Crabbe as Flash Gordon.
I saw them on DVD a couple of years ago, and couldn't believe how clunky they were.
As a young child, I guess I could watch almost anything, and think it was wild, exciting, tremendous. Especially if it was science fiction.


I also used to be a fan of these old time serials shows. They don't age well in great part because technology as overtaken them. They tried to remake the show in 2007 but like many things done these days. The idiots tried to re-invent the wheel. The 1980 movie Flash Gordon was great.
It was cheesy but that's fine with me. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-30-09  07:57pm - 5653 days #83
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
My biggest problem with the summer blockbusters of recent years is that for the most part they are utter crap. They are devoid of any inteligence, good writing, amazing character and memorable scenes. I don't mind that they might be like candy, but that's not what they are now. They are marketing designed special effect filled monsters who's soul purpose is to make you buy something.

What happened to movies that told a story first and then made money after the fact.

A few blockbusters will stand out but they rarely are the ones that should have but instead those less known movies.

Transformers as of monday had made over 220 million dollars at the box office. I haven't seen it yet but I will. I just wish and pray that it's not as bad as some of the reviews I have read or heard. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-29-09  10:45am - 5655 days #18
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Colm4:


Well I may have heard her name somewhere, maybe in some gossip magazines or something. But charly angels was never broadcasted here in Holland (I think). At least I never saw it.


That would explain why she was unknown. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-29-09  10:43am - 5655 days #20
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Welcome back WeewillyWinky. I hope to be able to read more of your comments in the forums and any reviews you feel like posting. I agree with lk2firone about taste being different and I persinally think that's more important than all being the same.

May I ask Who's your avatar? She looks familiar but I can't place her. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-28-09  07:06pm - 5655 days #16
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Colm4:


Never heard about Farrah Fawcett until she died. I don't think she's really pretty though. But I guess with the lack of Internet, every woman is considered pretty.

I'm not a major fan of Michael Jackson, but his songs are very good; actually bought a few yesterday.


It's true that her popularity is going back to the 80's but it's still strange that you have never heard of her. She was often typecasted as a bit of a dumb blond but somehow she was able to appear smarter than the role might have required. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-28-09  07:01pm - 5655 days #8
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I would like to think that most of us would be more than open minded toward any female willing to offer her views and reviews on sites or in the forum. There have been a couple of subjects that got quite heated but 99% of it always remained civilized. I for one would welcome a female point of view of sites. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-28-09  06:55pm - 5655 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I read somewhere that he injured himself flying. He wasn't wearing his seatbelt and the plane hit turbulence and he hit his head. The article was implying that this might be the cause of his death. The old theroy was that celebrities died in 3's. Of course the term celebrity does not mean what it used to be. In the last week we had Ed Macmon, Farrah Fawcett, Micheal Jackdson and now Billy Mays. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-26-09  06:39pm - 5657 days #74
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I saw "The Proposal" with Sandra Bulloick and Ryan Reynolds. It was a pretty good movie. It's a good romantic comedy with a couple of original jokes and some pretty decent acting. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-26-09  06:36pm - 5657 days #13
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
My favorite Farrah Fawcett movie: Sunburn with Charles Grodin.
My second favorite movie: Saturn 3. It's not a bad science fiction movie and it has one of her rare topless scenes. For us who had a major crush on her that was a treat. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-25-09  06:22pm - 5658 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Since it's not polite to speak ill of the deceased then I will simply say that Micheal Jackson was at one time one of the most popular singer in the world. His music marked a generation.

I'm old enough to have enjoyed Farrah when she was a sex symbol. Who remembers that she was married to the 6 million dollar man? Long live the Brown Coats.

06-24-09  07:10pm - 5659 days #17
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I really enjoyed "City of Ember". This is a science fiction movie about people that survived somekind of disaster(my guess is war) by
entombing themselves in an underground city. The actors actorsd are unkowns but it sill has supposrting roles with Tim Robbins, Bill Murray and Martin Landau. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-22-09  07:10pm - 5661 days #6
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
If you like science fiction and fantasy than the movie "Outlander" is very good. It's got some really good actors: james caviziel, John Hurtand Sophia Miles to name a few.

I'd have to know a little more what type of movies you like to help narrow the possibilities. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-17-09  05:39pm - 5666 days #23
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Here are the names of female performers that have died due to aids based on IAFD/rame.net website: Lisa Melendez, Lisa de Leeuw. The majority are male and most but not all were in gay porn. There might be more but they only post confirmed if not then it can classified under medical or something. The number of suicide is far greater.

In my opinion one performer is still one too many. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-16-09  06:37pm - 5667 days #65
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I think he owns part of United Artists, and that probably makes him plenty of money. Even if they didn't include his earnings from that studio, I would not be surprised if he makes plenty even for a bomb, because it is likely he (or any of these actors on this list) agree to commit to a film only after a considerable salary upfront, plus a certain percentage of box office gross. It is kind of like what Ford did with the latest Indy movie, though that was probably an unusually good deal. I could not stand that film, but it's part of a successful franchise, and was probably not too huge of a gamble to let him have so much of the profits.

Of course, it's all about the art, right?


I think you are correct that Tom owns part of a studio. I just thought that since the article mentioned actors that
they would be using earnings based on actual movie roles. Harrison is definetely on the list for Indiana Jones because I don't think he would have made the top 20 otherwise.

I've read a few articles going back to last year and the good old days of high earning salaries is pretty much over now. Too many actors, actresses and directors started putting their fingers in the pot even before the movie is made that most studios can't afford to make the movie.
It's kind of pathetic to think that a movie which has 2 stars and one director will cost 50 million before it's even started filming.

Of course you are correct. It's all worth it because we wouldn't have all these amazing movies that are tanking at the box office because they are crap(sorry I meant art). Long live the Brown Coats.

06-15-09  07:24pm - 5668 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by badandy400:


I could deal with some "charity" from a portstar. In other words she met a guy who does not want her doing other men. Of course solo and girl girl stuff is still cool. I guess I would be the same way.


She was a cutie that's for sure. I even made the mistake of joining her site because of her appeal. I lasted one day and then cancelled my membership. I'm not sure about the boyfriend. The general rumous was more in the line of hard drugs. Not too mention but she was dating another girl when she came into the biz. I hope that she found something else. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-14-09  09:29am - 5670 days #62
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


(Forbes Magazine listing)

Hollywood's 10 Top-Earning Actors

1. Harrison Ford
2. Adam Sandler
3. Will Smith
4. Eddie Murphy
5. Nicolas Cage
6. Tom Hanks
7. Tom Cruise
8. Jim Carrey
9. Brad Pitt
10. Will Ferrell




The funniest thing about that list is that I haven't watched a new movie from either Will, Eddy, Tom, Jim and Brad in a couple of years. The only reason that Harrison in on the list is because of the deal he had to make the recent Indiana Jones movie. I can't remember the last movie I saw with him before that last Indina movie.

Why is Tom Cruise in that list. Isn't Valkyrie the last movie he made? Although not a bomb I don't think it was a success. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-14-09  09:22am - 5670 days #28
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by badandy400:


Damn it people! This was a pretty hot thread reading about what other people thought wold be a great "personal pornstar"....... and now we are trying to figure out if you are still straight if you bag a dog of the opposite gender!?!?! Talk about a short attention span!


Sorry badandy for having sent this topic in a different direction. In our defense most topic always seem to go in a different direction as they progress. I promise to not mention anything else that isn't within the normal realm. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-13-09  07:02pm - 5670 days #13
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I know that most people prefer the bareback look. I'm part of a small minority that doesn't care either way. I grew up watching 70's porn where there was no mention of condoms, so I understand the reasons for it. I just don't want my enjoyment of something be the cause of someone's health being affected. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-13-09  06:54pm - 5670 days #19
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Wait, it doesn't end there. Don't forget the necrophiliacs. There's also the people who get into dolls and I'm sure there has to be word describing those whose dream is to be probed by alien life forms. And what about BadAndy who probably dreams of having a few terabytes of stuffing for dessert ;)


I did think about the necrophiliac, but I figured that since they were at least straight, gay or bi when they were alive then It stood to reason that they could still be classified under that same title.

I did not think about the alien aspect. Of course that opens the door to many kinds of possibility and most of them not being at all appealling.

Let me add one to the list: furry/furries Long live the Brown Coats.

06-13-09  06:42pm - 5670 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
To begin with the perfomer was working with a 37 day old test. That is a big no in the industry. Each performer must have a valid test.
The maximum length is 30 days for a test to be valid, so this performer should hot have ben working. Whomever hired her knowing this is likely to be in big trouble quite soon. The story mentions 16 performers and I have seen on some sites the number be as high as 22. This is another case of irresponsible journalism since these people never actually worked in the industry and therefore could not have infected other performer.

That said I would have no issue with a condom only penetration porn. I am fairly alone in this preference but I still hope. I'd rather not read that one or many of my favorite performers were infected with AIDS. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-12-09  07:07pm - 5671 days #57
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


It's a hell of a way to grow old, even without all that sex that I am assuming he used to get.


In some way it might be but I'm more of the opinion that it's a kind of torture. Afterall it's like living in a candy store with all of your favorite treats but you discover that you are now allergic to sugar. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-12-09  06:58pm - 5671 days #17
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Cybertoad originally listed "Sexual Orientation : Gay, Straight , Bi or Other?"...and the "Other" there has got us confused.


I guess that just leaves beastiality. Thta's one doggy style I don't really want to see. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-11-09  07:29pm - 5672 days #55
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:



On a different note:
Brad Pitt bought a painting at an art fair in Switzerland. List price of the painting: $960,000. Titled, "Etappe," the painting is by the German artist Neo Rauch. If the painting he bought is the one in the picture with Brad Pitt, some of us could probably do a painting that is as good as this one, without any artistic background. Just splash a lot of paint onto a canvass, and leave a bunch of white spaces in between the paint. That's the advantage of non-photographic painting: it's difficult to tell how much talent a person really has.

I look at paintings by Picasso, and I wonder if Picasso had his eyes crossed when he was painting. Or maybe he was just drunk at the time.

But a lot of people don't agree with me, I realize. They create stories in their minds when they look at the blobs of painting, and call it great art.

I'm thinking that if John Travolta and Denzel Washington are not available for my Mega-Movie, "The Prisoner Unchained Meets The Terminator At Batman's Cave," I might get Brad Pitt instead. He's a good-looking guy who can sometimes draw a crowd, which would help the gross revenues.

Casting will begin soon, when I rent a hotel room and start looking at female hotties who might light up the screen (and my hotel bed). The benefits of being a Motion Picture Producer. But where is that Wittyguy with the script already?



I've never been a fan of Picasso myself so I would never have a desire to purchase one of his paintings. That is if I had the means to do so, of course. Art is quite subjective, so what one thinks his amazing another thinks is crap.

I'm not surprised that an actor spent nearly a million on a painting that I find unimpressive. I try not to waste too much time on what very rich people do. It makes them look petty and small. Mind you that is probably what they are. How many people could have been fed with that money.
How many more doctors or nurses could we get for that money. If it weren't for middle class people the world would be a far worse place.

In his defense there was at least something on the canvas. I remember a 60 minutes special on modern art or such where someone bought a white canvas. Now that is just plain stupid. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-11-09  07:13pm - 5672 days #54
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Creepy and disturbing, but still his right to do so, and it seems to have television interested enough to think he, or whoever he is dating, is relevant to give them their own show. What I have seen of the show, there is not much to it; some behind the scenes stuff at photo shoots (which are softcore anyway), and their day to day "lives" at the mansion, but the girls are dumb as rocks, and you feel guilty after watching more than two minutes of it.

It is all about money; no matter how charming of a gentlemen Hef is, I seriously doubt he would be as popular, or at least as active, as he is if wasn't the millionaire founder of Playboy.


I don't expect TV execs to have inteligence or morales. The fact that Hugh can date 19yrs old twins is his right.
It's still a little creepy. To be honest I don't think Hugh has any desire to do anything with these women except to give them a peck on the cheek when they bring him his warm glass of milk before bedtime. Magic pill or no magic pill the man is in 80's.

I agree that he's on TV because he is Hugh Hefner. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-11-09  07:06pm - 5672 days #12
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I am wondering about this one myself...maybe some kind of porn star-only orientation that fluctuates from video to video, and is determined by how much pay she is receiving?


The other would be gay or lesbian. At least I hope it's one of those because another possibility is bestiality. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-10-09  06:51pm - 5673 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Just remember badanday. I want some pictures...Lots and lots of pictures. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-10-09  06:50pm - 5673 days #51
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
There was a time when Hugh Hefner was relevant, but in my opinion, that was decades ago. I haven't cared what he has to say since the late 80's early 90's. Frankly the thought of a 60yrs old dating a 20yrs old is more creepy than impressive. Hearing that an 80yrs is dating an 20yrs is just plain creepy and disturbing. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-09-09  06:56pm - 5674 days #9
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by badandy400:


True, she was plenty pissed off when she seen my sweet shirt from the strip club that I had signed by all the strippers and shot girls!


For future reference all you have to say is: But honey they wanted to sign my underwear and since I knew that would not be appropriate I told them to use my T-shirt. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-09-09  06:49pm - 5674 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Hair Color : Red
Hair Length : just alittle below the shoulder
Eyes: blue or green
Weight: 120lbs
Breast Size: small A cups
Breast Origin : Real..Real..Real. I would take 2 imperfectly shaped real breast anyday to perfect fake ones.
Nipples : Small.
Breast Type: hard
Pubic Hair, Yes please
Ass Type: small but with some curve
Pussy Type: small lips
Feet Size: to match body type
Tattoos: preferably none
Piercing ears only and not half a dozen
Ethnic: caucasian
Body Type: petite 5'5"
Sexual Orientation : Straight
Age: early to late 20's
Experience: who cares
Clothing: dresses
Favorite Fantasy Scene: all of them Long live the Brown Coats.

06-08-09  07:10pm - 5675 days #43
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I liked Get Smart when it played on TV as an original series. Thought Barbara Feldon was adorable, Don Adams was crazy (but a little irritating at times).

Did not understand why Barbara Feldon did not have a cameo in the movie version of Get Smart (2008) with Steve Carell and Anne Hathaway. I did not enjoy Get Smart (2008)


I'm the complete opposite on Get Smart. I loved that movie. I think it's the best movie based on an original TV show. They were able to keep the essence of the show and add to it. Steve Carrel's Max is not a bumbling idiot but an actual smart and talented agent who just happens to also be goofy. I'm not sure if another Get Smart is such a good idea, but I'm willing to give them a shot.

I would have been real surprised if Barbara had made a cameo since she didn't even make the Nude Bomb with Don Adams in the 80's.

On a different note. Take a look at John Staglianos' review of The Girlfriend Experiment. it's by far the best and most insightful review I have read so far.
http://www.adultfyi.com/read.php?ID=35261 Long live the Brown Coats.

06-08-09  06:51pm - 5675 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by badandy400:


I wasn't saying for them to sign them, rather I want to "download" them. :) But, signing a few hard drives would be pretty cool. I like that idea.


AS long as you don't ask them to sign your hard drive and point to your crotch at the same time them that should be fine. For some reason I think the other one will either get you thrown out or you better hope that's not indelible ink in her marker or you may have some explaining to do to your significant other. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-08-09  06:48pm - 5675 days #6
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
HI linzi welcome to PU. Hope to get your input on the subject discussed in this forum and more reviews.

Like wittyguy said. More is better. Doing your first review is always tough because you don't know exactly what to say and how to say it. I mostly copied the style of others that were and still are better than me. I've found a middle ground where my reviews are part toad, witty, messmer, badandy and quite afew others and me. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-05-09  06:49pm - 5678 days #31
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I've never seen Borat nor do I plan on ever seeing it. I don't judge that type of humour, but I know it's not for me. I assume that Bruno will be much the same except with a Gay charater.

I haven't seen the Girlfriend Experiment, but I won't pay 12$ to go see it a theather either. I'll wait until it comes out on cable and it's free. I have seen plenty of reviews and the only reason I would even bother to watch it is to see the quality/talent of Sasha Grey, because the story, characters and filming style seem to be less than impressive.

A friend saw Terminator and his review was: Blah! It wasn't worth the money. I should have waited for the DVD. I guess I'll take his advice. Anyway I want to see UP. Rottem Tomatoes gave it a 98% Terminator got only 47. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-04-09  07:08pm - 5679 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
That's truly sad. I do not care what they write or say about him. In the absence of actual proof it will simply be a guess. I will instead remember all the great movies he made, and that I still love to watch today.

Death Race 2000
Blood Sport
Circle of Iron
Q
Lone Wolf Mcquade
The Warrior and the Sorceress
Kill Bill 1&2

Frankenstein may you ride off into the great highway in the sky. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-04-09  06:58pm - 5679 days #32
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Touche! Now, if only the porn industry shifted their focus from cheesy remakes of tv shows and movies and focused on musicals. It'd definitely take talent for some starlet to be "singing in the rain" in some bukkake video. Besides, it'd give all those unemployed Broadway types something to do during the recession (for the love of God, no Clay Aiken porn though).


I like the idea of a porn musical, but you may want to leave out the unemployed Broadway types. I believe that quite a few of them are gay. I have nothing against Gays per say but that doesn't do anything for me...unless it's lesbian porn. Afterall we should keep an open mind.

Then again they could always remake old time porn movies.
I'd be highly curious to see someone remake "Behind the Green Door". Long live the Brown Coats.

06-04-09  06:52pm - 5679 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I found this web page about the man who was found guilty of owning child pornography. He's Australian. I assume that this has not happened in Canada or the US. I do think that if it ever did then we would be going down a slipery legal road. www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,24767142-29277,00.html Long live the Brown Coats.

06-03-09  06:18pm - 5680 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I read somewhere that a guy has been convicted or at least added to the pedophile database because he had Simpson porn cartoons on his computer. That is making a mockery of the legal system. The only thing these kinds of judgements do is dilute or perverse the law. After a while the law simply no longer works because of this. I'm sorry but I don't think that a guy who has a Bart & Lisa sex based
cartoon is the same thing as a guy who has pictures or videos of guys having sex with children. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-03-09  06:11pm - 5680 days #23
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Messmer you are a nutcase and I for one really appreciate it. Now I will have to look for another avatar that doesn't involve my sperm.
Afterall, I am a rather shy person. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-02-09  07:00pm - 5681 days #27
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
You are quite right lk2fireone about the suspension of disbelief being very important when watching a movie. I use it all the time when I'm watching a good movie because I stop thinking that I'm in a theather with a few hundred other people watching something happening on the screen. Instead I'm living in that world. I know that I thought I would be a greta rebel pilot/jedi after watching Star wars or that I would make a great captain for the Enterprise. My issue with the Dark Knight and quite a few other movies is that you cannot a world with it's own rules and regulation and then disregard them for the sake of the story. The first Batman had the Joker has a bad guy but he was by default in charge of a criminal organisation. The joker in the Dark knight was a nutcase who was able to break into the houses of crime lords and kill them or bring the city to it's knees requiring Gordon to pretend to be killed so that the Da pretends to be Batman so that the Joker comes after him and so on. ARE YOU KIDDING ME. It makes for great effects but makes no sense in the new Batman world.

It's like any thriller or horror movie where the director decides to spring a surprise on us that we didn't see coming because it makes no sense.

P.S: I for one don't mind any and all off topic post. They are sometimes fun and always informative. Long live the Brown Coats.

3151-3200 of 3575 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 12 22 32 42 52 63 Page 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.17 seconds.