Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Drooler (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1831)  |   Threads Started (45)

451-500 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 9 Page 10 11 17 23 29 36 37 Next Page >

03-03-12  04:32pm - 4677 days Original Post - #1
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA

What do other users think of photos of a model shot in such a way that they seem to be from the perspective of a tiny person looking up at her? You know, Tom Thumb.

In The Crack regularly features these kinds of shots, but a few other sites also have them at times. ATK Galleria comes to mind.

It's true that you often get a good view of the crotch area, though above that it's just a murky cloud that resembles the model's face.

Personally, I don't care much for them. It's no big deal to me, but sometimes I just pitch them into the dust bin.

Yet they must be appealing to at least some folks. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-02-12  03:08pm - 4678 days #14
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I think Ed and Hod do make valid points. It's easy to not care, most of the the time I don't. I rarely click on ads but have done so occasionally and most of surfing is innocuous and not of much help to advertisers since I'm not a very loyal customer to anyone. And, yes, we are already a good ways down the proverbial road to hell in terms of lost privacy.

What gives me pause though is that all this info is being collected without any overarching rules other than "cash is king", meaning you don't know who or what is happening with your info. More importantly, as computer alogorithms and processors get better this info can lead to a very complete picture of who you are. Maybe not today but that future is very near. Frankly, without knowing who might get access to "me" and how that info will be used I am concerned.

I'm not trying to make a purely ideological stand. I know that we are all going to be more public as time goes by, there's no way around that unless you suddenly go full on Amish with your lifestyle. Nor do I trust that government regulation will solve much (lawyers and lobbyists get paid to take care of that). I guess my point is why make it easy for them when you don't know what your getting in return. Yeah, I get access to the web but does that mean I have to surrender all my on-line activity information to some corporate behemouth? I want some something more than what I'm currently getting before I'll give it all up for capitalism.


Here's the kind of scenario that bugs me, and it's not implausible. A profile of you is built based on your web surfing (include computers, smart phones, etc.) -- everything you type and everything you text and possibly everything you say along with what you browse.

Your profile is among the eventual billions that will be up for sale to whomever is interested.

To make it easier to trove your data, key words are searched for and a corpus of how you put those words into context is created. Red flags are displayed next to the juicy bits.

This information, if found not to the liking of a health insurer, a prospective employer, etc. is then used to deny you coverage, deny you a job, deny you a promotion, deny you credit, deny you a discount, etc. It could sometimes even be used as a flimsy pretext for denying people such things as specific medical procedures or mortgage interest rates. Sure, there may be no relationship between what you said and what you need, but it will be up to you -- little, solitary you -- to fight and win in this overwhelming system of data collection and abuse.

That's the kind of thing that bothers me. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Mar 02, 2012, 03:15pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-28-12  02:13pm - 4681 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		I don't like tats. I don't know how many times I've seen a nice looking thumbnail of a babe in a rather subtly lit place who, when brought to full size, had some ugly-ass tattoo over or even ON her ass.

Then I go I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-24-12  04:30pm - 4685 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Seems that fake is the "new real" for some. It doesn't have to be for those who don't like it. I don't like false titties either. Go ahead and vote as you wish. I mean, if they're guilt free about pushing the silicone monsters at you (cue scene from Woody Allen's Everything You Always Wanted ...), be just as guilt free about screaming "NO!" with your 1's and 2's. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Feb 24, 2012, 04:34pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-22-12  02:17pm - 4687 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Yes, you'll get a lot of pics that are similar as there are so many. The basic ALS "narrative" is the girl slowly undressing, perhaps occasionally pausing to play with a sex toy along the way, sometimes with a female assistant, then getting more naked and until completely naked and then there's more assistant stuff with another "toy."

It includes pics of the girl looking away, looking, down, sometimes laughing, speaking to people off camera, giving the finger, etc. They're very candid shots at certain points.

The assistants are often hot models, too, such as Eufrat and Blue Angel, just to name a couple of the more recent ones. And they are also featured models at the site.

Hope this helps. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-18-12  05:23pm - 4691 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Capn:


Electronic Tagging is the only option.

Cap'n.


Well, so much for channel cruising past the latest of Nature. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-18-12  06:54am - 4691 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Yes, I found all of the answers, too. Even with the images not loaded! This is better than McMonolopy! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-12  05:55pm - 4692 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Actually, I find it obnoxious when a site uses playmate-style names. Pier999 did this, though looking back through their model list now, it seems they've changed a lot of the names back to the more recognizable ones. Anyway, names like "Veronica Maplehurst" and "Gloria Drake" are the linguistic equivalent of "Did I just eat something?" fast food.

Another annoying practice that is far more pervasive goes something like this:
What's her first name?
Kristina.
What color is her hair?
Blond.
OK. Kristina Blond, then.

Finally, some names are just used so much that for a long-term porn collector, you wind up with quite of lot of brush (if you'll pardon the expression) to wade through. I've got so many Ann's, Anne's, Niki's, Nikki's, Nicky's, Veronica's, Veronika's, Veroniyka's, and Verronnikya's that I need a friggin' telescope to find the damn vanishing point.

Oh, I have a postscript: Girls named X XXXX. You know, like Veronika XXX, or Kelly Foxxx or Nikkii SeXxX. Boy, now that's a cliche that deserves a speedy retirement! Quick! The gold watch! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-16-12  05:05pm - 4693 days #21
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


There was a time I would have agreed with Winston and god knows I've tried but shit like this is what pisses me off.



1980 - The beginning of deregulation and the redistribution of wealth upwards through the disproven farce of Reaganomics, aka voodoo economics or trickle down which laid the ground work for corporate control and 'Citizens United' (or as it should be called 'Corporations First'). Trickle down never worked as they said it would (mainly because wealth doesn't trickle down, it really flows up), it worked as they really expected and intended, to strengthen corporate power, and to merge corporation and state. So I don't see myself as liberal, I just feel like an unwilling participant in a anal porn flick.


"Deregulation," as the chart indicates, is a nice code word for "The Increasing Value of Purchasable Members of Congress."

So I guess what we need is THIS! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-16-12  04:46pm - 4693 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Yes, that Stephanie (plus you name it) has been a real pain in the name-it for me, too.

Today, I just realized that Edwige A of MetArt has been Anna Tatu; yesterday, that Alsu of Amour Angels has for some time now been Irina B at MetArt.

Well, that "Edwige" name had to go,anyway. That speaks for itself. And I've got more Irinas than Kiev, probably. Alsu has a nice sound to it.

Perhaps what we need for these girls' names is the equivalent of domain name resolution. You know, a nice fat and expanding table sitting around at multiple points along the Internet, so when some damn new website calls her "Cindy" or "Hope," she'll always show up on your hard drive as "Klaudia."

Call it "De Damn Name Resolution." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Feb 16, 2012, 04:50pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-11-12  09:56pm - 4698 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


I do like the quote, however:

"The hacker claiming responsibility for the breach told The Associated Press that he carried out the attack to draw attention to the site's vulnerability."

mmmm..OK.

You mean you really did it just to make a name for yourself and gain some street cred among your fellow sociopaths and delinquents at Anonymous. Spare us the story about being the noble knight coming to the rescue. Anonymous always puts out this line to try to obscure the obvious fact thay they are just a bunch of antisocial delinquents and vandals running amok.


Yes, it's a bit much, isn't it? Kind of like saying, "We broke down your front door by repeatedly smashing it with a battering ram just to make it clear to you that you have a weak spot in your home security." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-11-12  07:15pm - 4698 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		I joined them once, several years ago, but used Epoch for billing.

Thanks for the post. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-06-12  04:53pm - 4703 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		I look at some of the old, old tiny grainy pics that I got and think, "What was I thinking?"

But that train of thought goes off the rails when I find old pics I got from ATK archives, years back, of Holly Samson as she was all-natural. You know a girl is stunning when it comes through even in old, funky quality pics.

Yeah, some of my collection I'll throw away, and some are on the hard drive of an old computer that I still haven't thrown away, and some (as above-mentioned) I'll probably keep 'til my hands are trembling too much with age to do anything about it. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-05-12  10:08am - 4704 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		I've had a few calls made to me over the years or things related. Once I suddenly couldn't use a card and had to pluck out another to cover something; soon called Company A and they'd suspended transactions over an online (porn) purchase attempt I'd made. But we got it straightened out quickly.

I'm in agreement that I'd much rather have a security-conscious credit card company than one that lets things go. I once had a card with one of the name banks and was getting small unauthorized charges. Called and they said it was nothing surprising, happens all the time, and I then decided to just cancel the card, which they agreed to do over the phone, after the perfunctory stalling tactics and me being absolutely insistent.

Then I get even more fucking little charges AFTER that and the bank puts a dispute on my credit report. So I just waited that one out, figuring that attempting to work with them might lead to more trouble.

Fucking morons. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Feb 05, 2012, 10:12am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-03-12  04:01pm - 4706 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		The Super Bowl isn't quite as in trouble as the Thanksgiving family dinner, but it has lost its luster now that it has become a tired old Big Business institution. It's not really even about the game; it's about money. The media is trying to generate excitement and interest, as usual, for us braying little sheep who need it to tell us what to do.

I'll think that once the pre-game show starts, I'll switch off the tube and spend my time reviewing my personal accounts, just to keep with the spirit of things. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-01-12  03:19pm - 4708 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Technology: The art of rearranging life so that you don't have to experience it.

Sure, but fake cum? What's fun about that? Not that I personally mind so much. Fake or not, I don't watch them anyway. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-27-12  11:22pm - 4713 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by graymane:


Heaven help us if another cloned Bush-whacker had got-hold of another four years.



I think about that sometimes, and my blood runs cold. Another "deficits don't matter unless there's a Democrat president" clown would be enough, I think, to lower ratings on US Treasury securities.

Another turkey with an acute case of historical amnesia to cut regulations such that we have another staggering round of financial crisis. Don't they understand what happened in 1929? And that it has a hell of a lot to do with what happened between 1939 and 1945?

We've certainly had ENOUGH of the Republican "message," haven't we???? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-26-12  03:15pm - 4714 days #25
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Hey Denner,

Congrats on your Big Thou'! It's a staggering figure. May there be many more!

Party

Chicks

Ooops! Too much booze! (Must be St. Patty's Day beer by the looks of it.)

I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-23-12  04:31pm - 4717 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		During WWII, to root out resistance fighters in Marseilles, France, the SS razed about 1,400 structures to the ground. Anyone else who just happened to be in the way was, to put it mildly, most unfortunate.

And most unfortunate are those using Megaupload within the confines of the law who got caught in the same mass detonation. Justice should be a little more selective. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-21-12  03:18pm - 4719 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		My experience when I was a member a few short months ago was that there was stuff I'd not seen anywhere else, and was delighted to find, and there was also stuff from other places.

Usually the non-exclusive stuff was of American girls, though I did find an exception with one of Alissa White/Yaro/or is that Alyssa. I mean that blond girl with the soft eyes and puckery kissy lips who has appeared at MPL Studios, Watch4Beauty, and several other sites.

Partial Digression: One big red flag on this issue I'd found -- while we're on the subject -- was some of the APD Nudes material showing up at Twistys.

Anyway, we should protest when a site claims to be exclusive and it's not.

But the thing about the Diesel Access "network" that bothered me the most was how inconsistent they were about photo sizes. They'd label a zip download as a particular size (photo dimensions) and it would sometimes turn out to be smaller.

And from one photoset to the next, there's no consistency in the offerings. Sometimes you get 4000 pixels, sometimes only 1500 pixels, etc. and that's the recent stuff. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-19-12  05:26pm - 4721 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


I see small, tasteful tattoos as tolerable. But nipple and clit piercings, tramp stamps and other massive tattoos I think have ruined the looks of far too many otherwise good looking women. I've lost track of the number of videos and picture sets I've not bothered to save while thinking, "Damn - why did she have to go and do that to herself?"


The same! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-18-12  04:49pm - 4722 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		I just LOVE the PU Forum Awards. Hell, they're almost better than porn!

I understand that Wittyguy can't always do them as soon as we'd like, but I'm looking forward to "barbecue time," whenever it is! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-07-12  12:00pm - 4733 days #18
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


Thanks, Drooler. And you are so right. Page design is a nightmare much of the time - so many factors to keep in mind (Users don't worry about bandwidth efficiency, server load efficiency, browser compatibility, search-engine optimisation, standards compliance, ease of maintenance etc.)


After all that, "ease of maintenance" does seem like a bit of an afterthought, doesn't it?

I'd say that browser compatibility alone is enough to drive a person . I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-07-12  02:13am - 4734 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Somehow I've forgotten about the weekly drawing. I guess it's only through email that it's done. That's OK, but I need to check more often, I s'pose. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-06-12  10:26am - 4734 days #16
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


In the last revamp of my main site I upped the thumbnail size to 250 pixels, so I hope that meets with your approval. I only give a limited selection outside the members' area obviously, but all the provided thumbs will expand when clicked on to the largest size supported by your current browser window.


It's always a bit of a balancing trick trying to get the display issues, aesthetics, quality and usability right when designing a website's page layout - making the thumbnails big enough to see clearly whilst getting enough on view to give a quick idea of the whole set and leaving room to display other updates too. It's something I usually end up tweaking every few months.


Ed, you da man. And believe me, I do appreciate the work involved with keeping the pages looking right. Anyone who thinks it's easy hasn't done it. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-05-12  07:28pm - 4735 days #13
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Some sites let you choose the thumbnail size. It's a nice feature! InFocusGirls and OnlyCuties do this, for instance. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-04-12  06:23pm - 4736 days #21
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Why anyone would steal -- let alone pay for -- most of the crap that comes out of Hollywood is beyond me. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-04-12  06:16pm - 4736 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


Ayeyup! Man, I hate all the squinting I have to do these days.


I think that from now on, I'll only join sites that are "ophthalmologist recommended." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-04-12  03:32pm - 4736 days Original Post - #1
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA

I was looking through the sites I'm subscribed to right now and was struck by how difficult it was to view some thumbnail photos. It's especially hard when the subject takes up only about 50% of the shot AND the thumbnails themselves are really too small and I find myself squinting.

I don't have that problem with MPL Studios or the ATK Galleria or Premium sites (though I sure do with ATK Petites, which has smaller thumbnails).

The solution I propose is simply this: Make the thumbnails 200 pixels on the long end (200px tall for portrait orientation, 200px wide for landscape). This is the size used by the above-mentioned sites that aren't a problem.

So webmasters everywhere: Please make your thumbnail photos large enough for easy viewing. It would be most appreciated! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-04-12  02:32pm - 4736 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		I've also felt robbed by sites that do this. If they'd simply label such videos as "BTS," then I wouldn't have anything to gripe about.

I don't know which is worse, general silence but lots of camera flashing, which I at least used to see in hardcore videos at Earl Miller, or lots of talking.

A long time ago, I found a bunch of videos at ATK Galleria with models like Brandy Smith in which the director was talking throughout a hardcore shoot. He'd say things like "Stop. Turn a bit to the right. Keep fucking ..."

It does give you an idea of what the shoots are really like, but as I said, they should always be labeled clearly so that the paying user doesn't feel cheated.

Kind of makes one develop a greater fondness for the photoshoots that result. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Jan 04, 2012, 02:35pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-03-12  03:03pm - 4737 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Just a thought: What COULD be wrong with anyone named "Porno Dan"? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-03-12  03:02pm - 4737 days #20
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Kevin:


Hi there, Khan brought this post to my attention so I thought I'd chime in. When a user logs in and selects "Remember Me" we only save the log-in for 14 days. This is mainly for security reasons in case you don't visit for a while, it automatically makes you log-in next time. There was (possibly, depending on how you look at it) a slight oversight in it though. When you visited the site and were "auto logged in" it didn't extend that 14 days, which I believe it should have. I have updated it now, so theoretically as long as you visit once every two weeks, you should never have to log-in again. Unless of course you delete your cookies, use a different browser, manually click log-out, etc.. Hope that helps!


Yes, that does help. It's very clear. You should be writing technical manuals, if you're not already. Thanks!! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-02-12  05:12pm - 4738 days #15
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Khan:


I'm looking at our log here and it looks like your IP address changed back at the end of Nov. but has remained the same since then. Looking further back it appears your ISP might change you IP every once in a while but not especially often.

It's possible the site's security software uses a default message when it locks out an account. But that's absolutely just a WAG (wild ass guess).

Hopefully, the site owner will get back to you. Do let us know what you find out.


Hey, Khan, I've got a question. Usually, I can just go to PornUsers from a bookmark and don't have to log in, but occasionally I do have to, maybe once a month or two. Would that possibly be due to a change in my IP address?

Thanks! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-02-12  05:01pm - 4738 days #14
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		For what it's worth at this point, I'll just say that I've been in a variety of scenarios over the years in which I've been falsely accused of account sharing. Sometimes the provider itself was not secure, and that even included subscription/billing services.

Once I signed up for a site and was IMMEDIATELY suspended on grounds of account sharing, and I hadn't even logged in the first time! So that was either a hack or an inside job or some security software chanelling Chicken Little.

Fortunately, these things don't happen often, and I'm like RearAdmiral in keeping the usepass strong and the accounts mine and mine alone.

But it just goes to show you that no matter what you do, there's at least a slight chance that you'll get thrown over a barrel through no fault of your own.

Most of the time, I was able to work it out with the company, fortunately. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Jan 02, 2012, 05:04pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-31-11  03:36pm - 4740 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Happy New Year to you, too, Khan, and all the TBP and PU crew and members I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-28-11  02:33pm - 4743 days #37
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by t9chome:


Sheena Shaw

Sheena's a hot petite 26 yr old from Florida. So far, the only scenes I've found of her are at OnlyTeenBlowjobs.com, Amateur Allure & FuckedHard18.com with the latter showing off her perfect ass and passionate nature. Started late this year. She's one to watch in 2012.


FYI, Sheena Shaw just started appearing at FootFetishDaily, and I agree that she's really hot! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-28-11  01:09am - 4744 days #25
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Khan:


No worries ... I wasn't bugged at all.

It's just if I don't answer when something like that is said, then some might get the idea I'm one of those cell phone/twitter junkies who can't go ten minutes w/out reaching out and being noticed.


Happy holidays.


I must say it looks weird to me, as I managed to spend part of my life during a time when the only handheld device a person might be carrying was a cigarette lighter. I suppose that the Walkman was the first step into technonarcissim, and now it seems that the slippery slope was made of Teflon.

Anyway, thank goodness for PornUsers! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-26-11  02:19pm - 4745 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Wow, we can actually say "Merry Christmas" around here without getting our knuckles rapped for being politically incorrect?

How nice! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-24-11  04:09pm - 4747 days #16
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Capn:


Not really.

What D. is saying there is in order to gain access to the site, we have to overcome the challenge of the captcha box. ie risk being locked out by repeated failure.

The point of the captcha box is to ensure that the user is a human rather than a bot trying to crack security.

HTH

Cap'n.


Ahoy, Capn, nicely said.

And the point is to ensure that the user is at least human, if not superhuman. I can already think of a comedy scenario in which a contemporary Superman is sitting at a computer and is given impossibly hairy looking captcha's to type in and gets them right every time, with his Windows-Keyboarding SuperSkills.

And since Denner doesn't seem to grasp the "risking of failure" point, then, well ... could it be ...? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-24-11  10:14am - 4747 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Yariana:


Hi everyone,

I need a little advice from the professonal porn users here. Especially from you pic lovers. I have always run a site that specializes in video and never had much interest in posting pic sets.

The main reason is all the work converting to different sizes and manually having to watermark all those pics. I am now converting to a professional CMS that does all the encoding of video and pics for me so I will be adding a lot more pictures to the site.

I am not sure whether it is common to watermark pics provided in the membership section that are packaged in zip files for download. Most webmasters tell me "watermark everything!" while most surfers tell me "No, I won't join a site that watermarks their pics. It ruins the pics."

I can see the argument on both sides but am not sure what is most common in the industry. In my opinion, if someone really wants to pirate the pic, they could easily crop off the watermark. They do it all the time with video. But my fellow webmasters say "why make it easy for them"

On the other hand, I want my members happy with the pics. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Have a wonderful Christmas.


If I were producing content, I'd watermark, but keep it small and non-intrusive. As a user, I HATE watermarks that interfere with my viewing. And there have been some sites with extremely, ridiculously large and ugly and garish watermarks!

I think to myself: "They went to all of the trouble to arrange shooting (a lot involved just there) and editing and so on, and THEN they RUIN THEIR OWN WORK with a watermark that a lot of people are going to just HATE."

So, don't be that person.

And good luck with the CMS. I used to work with one (can't remember the name now), and it was awful. Hopefully, yours will turn out to be more solution than "added nuisance." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-24-11  12:30am - 4748 days #21
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Man, I've been time strapped this year so the annual forum awards are on hold for the moment. If it happens it won't be until January ... plenty of time to buy additional kevlar undies to cover your ass.


I think it works out. We can get the stuff at holiday discount prices. Thanks for the update.

And have a nice, safe holiday. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-23-11  04:49pm - 4748 days #19
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Capn:


I'm in my foxhole & have my tin hat on.

My 'liberated' MG42 is at the ready!

Cap'n.


Yes, maybe it's time to crack open the old Y2K bunker and get under a table ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-23-11  04:00pm - 4748 days #17
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Since I started the "Thoughts about the PU points system" thread (where Khan rightfully beat down my ideas like a red headed step child) I figure I'll take another stab at it here.

I really don't care about who has the most points or not. I'll never be one of the ones on top nor do I care to (nor do I have the time or porn budget to do so). The question I guess comes down to marketing. Do we go with the current "hall of fame" system where people get acknowledged for life time achievements or do we go with an "all star" system that rewards the best of the current generation / contributors? I suppose the latter might appeal to people who are new to PU in that they can move up the ladder more quickly and get acknowledgment for that. Then again, it's going to take quite a while to make the top 5 list even if the change were made so that by the time you hit the big time in points you're going to be considered an old timer by internet posting standards.

For me, I wouldn't mind seeing a requirement that people be required to post a review / comment / reply every six months or year in order to maintain their official point status. That would at least change things up more over time. Then again, it probably wouldn't be anything more than "change for the sake of change" in that it wouldn't really affect my input or most peoples input here. Six of one, half dozen of another.


Speaking of activity -- hopefully not "passed" -- is Wittyguy going to do a "PUey" Awards for 2011? The first one, in 2008, was Dec 1st, and they've come a bit later each year, but now I'm starting to worry as this year's has not yet appeared.

I've really been looking forward to it. Hope it's on the way ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-23-11  09:53am - 4748 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Old friend, please tell me/explain to me, your:

"The real purpose of "captcha" type-in boxes is to remind us that sometimes we have to risk failure."

I'm lost here....and eager to learn...


Well, some sites require that you type characters into a box before you can do something, such as a login or a search. 21st Sextury sites had that. I think Lizzie's Secrets does, too. And NextDoorModels (or is it Next-Door Models?).

The codes you have to type in are usually not that easy to read, as they have different colors or squiggly lines through them or black-on-white/white-on-black or characters that are "squished" together, so you risk failure once you've typed in the code and hit enter. If you typed it in wrong, you'll have to try again.

What's worse is that some of them hit you with diacritic marks, such as umlauts or cedillas or accents, or even superscripts or Greek or Cyrillic characters. So you REALLY risk failure then. I know I do.

So it was a joke about those "captcha" code boxes. And we all have to risk failure to get anywhere in real life ...

Shouldn't there be a hip-hop artist named KAPTCHA BOX or something like that? Might there be one already?

Was there one who didn't make it, perhaps? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-23-11  09:41am - 4748 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


I'll be da......
And oh, yes.........welcome back!!!


Whoa! I just came in, looked at the home page, saw that latest review posted by Roseman, and the hair on the back of my neck nearly stood up.

I guess I've been missing my calling ... as a fortune teller.

Well, Denner, how 'bout that? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-22-11  04:16pm - 4749 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Imagine that inactive accounts lose status after, say, 2 years. If that happened, my bet is that within a day of his point loss (as in the "All Star" system Wittyguy describes), Roseman would return and would be less than happy.

I get tired of seeing the same names at the top myself, but I figure that's just me, being human. We like to see new things sometimes. That's why the payroll deduction tax extension hullabaloo got so old so fast and why the only interesting thing about the Republican party presidential contender competition is that we get a new up-n-comer every so often, even though every single one of them have said things that disqualify them for basically any kind of respectable leadership position you could name.

PU accounts aren't like bank accounts, which can be seized by the state after so much time unused. Think of it: Your PU points will last longer than real money! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 22, 2011, 04:19pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-21-11  09:24pm - 4750 days #16
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I'm with Pat on this one. If I don't watch it every so often I usually just toss it. If I get tired of looking at the scenes I have then they get deleted. Ditto with the low quality files of old I have. I don't even have one TB of porn mostly because I edit down my photo sets and only keep "the best" videos. For me, it's mostly just a mindset I have that carries over from real life: I don't really have any collections to speak of, if I find that I don't wear the clothes I have then they get donated, I despise knick knacks and other stuff like that labeling it all as "junk". For me, if I keep my stuff at a manageable level then I find I'm happier.

The only reason I can see for keeping huge volumes of porn is the occasional discovery of some gem that you forgot you downloaded. Really though, it's just a mindset. I never download whole sites because I only want the stuff I like and will look at. I guess you could liken it to some food snob who raves about five star meals but disses the all you can eat buffet. When it comes to food I'm all about mass quantities but when it comes to porn I'm a high class snob ... although most would say I'm just in a class by myself.


Funny how I used to be lot more like Wittyguy about the porn. I'd look through every photo, every video, and keep only what I knew I really wanted. Now it's getting more like the buffet, but not "all you can eat."

I've never understood why anyone would want to download an entire site. Is everything on it appealing? Is nothing unappealing? Or are those questions beside the point, and it's just porn hoarding to the extreme? Something like the hard drive with 20,000 Olga's on it? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-21-11  09:29am - 4750 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Thanks for the scoop on Alyssia Loop. She looks nice! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 21, 2011, 09:47am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-21-11  03:35am - 4751 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		At some point soon, the bridge will appear and will be crossed, however it happens, whether it's deleting some things and/or buying another hard drive even with the high Thai-flood prices.

For me, that bridge appeared and I recently bought a 3 TB to back up pics and mothball an older, less capacious drive. After nearly 4 weeks, it's almost done. And there's a lot of video that I've kept on yet another drive that I have to go through, which I think is more time consuming; with photos, you can open and glance through quickly, but videos tend to make you slow down and watch.

Anyway, with all of the additional space now available, I've gotten more liberal about what I save, so I'll probably be in a similar fix to yours at some point in time, probably this year. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-18-11  05:50am - 4754 days #30
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Here's something ponderable: "How many links on the Internet are dead at any given moment? What percentage of the total is it?"

Found an interesting article (from 2008, and still active) about how even the links to professional journals die rather soon. About 18% of historical journal links are dead in a year, it says. Well, said. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

451-500 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 9 Page 10 11 17 23 29 36 37 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.

Loaded in 0.06 seconds.