Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Drooler (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1831)  |   Threads Started (45)

1401-1450 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 8 14 20 28 Page 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Next Page >

06-01-09  12:56am - 5683 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		I also located and read through the exchange. The very first thing the user did was open up with a name-calling insult. A later reply was a qualification of the order of "OK, you're not an XX, but you sound like one."

The user would do well to take a few steps back and see what he sounds like.

Thanks to Denner for bringing this up for forum discussion. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-27-09  03:40am - 5688 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		I've never had a problem with epoch (knock on wood). But always save your subscription ID. I copy it as soon as it shows on the confirmation page -- in a split second -- just before the confirmation page disappears, as it sometimes does. Then I paste it into my personal database of subscriptions.

DHD Media, on the other hand, sometimes makes it a chore to quit. You go through screen after screen of "Don't go!" or other beseeching cries as they attempt to tantalize you into staying, sometimes with photos of content that has already been posted (e.g., at Digital Desire). It's especially bad at Danni, where you are required to choose why you are quitting and THEN also provide a reason to type in. Ridiculous! I just type in things like "because!" or "Quit Quit Quit!" The script detects text, and then you can finally move on and actually friggin' QUIT!

Funny how it's actually possible for a porn site to be more co-dependent of its members than the members are of it. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-26-09  12:02pm - 5689 days #15
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I guess I should have said "prominence" instead of "existence" regarding annual fees disappearing in the 90's. I think most major cards charged annual fees (that's what I recall) until the 90's came along with the advent of all the teaser/transfer rates and stuff really got going.

Yes, package creep is definitely the more pressing concern. I was handed another creepy below the belt jab of pain last week when I realized that my favorite brand of hamburger helper type crap reduced it's package size but not it's price. If want hamburger soup, I'll make it. However, damn it, I actually want some noodles to go along with my colon clogging meat binge. Where is the humanity? Where is my snake eyed Congressman in my moment of need? Forget Osama, send the troops into the factories to ensure that Americans still have access to large quantities of cheap pre-packaged obesity inducing meals instead of actually having to cook. To do otherwise would be un-American ;)


Yeah, they're fuckin' with us in all kinds of ways. Hamburger Helper costs the same but the pkg keeps shrinking. Pay for the groceries with the credit card (need I say more on that?). Then take it home -- property taxes, rents, etc. going up but the school district can't make ends meet, either. And now it's tough to finance those important home improvements 'cause credit's gotten tight. Makes you want to say, "Fuck it!" and go gambling or just buy a lottery ticket. Maybe it will at least help the elderly. Eh! Whatever. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-25-09  08:30am - 5690 days #12
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


To me it's not that big of a deal. If the card companies do start to raise or add on annual fees it's not the end of the world. It was only in the 1990's that the idea of a "no annual fee" card came into existence. Typically, if you want credit you have to pay something whether that's interest or a fee for the "privilege" of accessing credit. It's just that we've gotten used to the idea of the freebie credit card. If people are bitchin' over this issue imagine how they're going to feel when we have to get serious about tackling social security and medicare. That's going to make this look like child's play when it comes to money we're going to be forking out.

Overall though it will help the country as a whole reduce our debt dependency. I guess I veiw it sort of like health insurance where we probably pay higher premiums than our individual health dictates because we have to pick up part of the tab for the sickly.

I think that you'll see more annual fees or higher interest rates for a while until the card companies figure out that they're driving away too much business. Either that or you'll start see more local banks or nontraditional credit card institutions offering cards, albeit with smaller credit limits, as a way to move in on the business that the big boys don't want.


Yeah, what's the big deal? It's not like the credit card companies are sending out card offers right, left, and center anymore to encourage people to accumlate debt and debt servicing, now that the average American family carries $8,000-$10,000 of it.

What's a little more? It's just an annual fee and no grace period, anymore.

(Sounds like music to the ears of the card card business.)

Besides, we've all got more important things to think about, like ... packaging creep. (And guess who brought that up?) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-22-09  02:14am - 5693 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I don't see where "on the face of it, it looks good in that credit card holders will have fewer problems with high interest rates."

I don't see this as beneficial reform.


I don't either, in answer to both statements. It's being touted as reform that is beneficial to the consumer (the "face of it" being presented to the public), but I think it's just going to make things worse.

If necessary, and it probably will be, I'll have to shop around for cards that don't gouge me. We'll see if "free market competition" works, with companies competing for customers by continuing to offer grace periods and no annual fees. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-21-09  02:32pm - 5694 days Original Post - #1
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA

In the US, President Obama is due to sign, tomorrow, legislation on how interest rates may be raised by credit card companies. The law goes into effect in nine months.

On the face of it, it looks good in that credit card holders will have fewer problems with high interest rates.

But I've been reading about a down side to this, which is that credit companies are going to compensate for their losses by 1) reinstituting annual fees, even for their best borrowers, and 2) eliminating the grace periods before interest begins on a purchase; that is, interest begins as soon as you buy.

There's an article about it at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/business/19credit.html

Frankly, I don't see this as a potential improvement. It looks more like a game of moving the goal posts.

If new annual fees and the vanquishing of the grace period were to take place, would it affect your behaviors in signing up for sites? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on May 21, 2009, 02:35pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-21-09  02:01pm - 5694 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Typical of the dishonest person. They lie to themselves, too, saying things like, "I won't get caught. There are so many reviews here, who's going to notice?"

Parasites!

Maybe "someofpat" will return as "lotsaExotics." ;) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on May 21, 2009, 04:59pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-19-09  03:04pm - 5696 days #51
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Yup, pushing this one to the top of the heap again. I just wanted to add a couple of things here.

First, a lot of reviewers here like vids and make very little mention of pics ...


It's true, it's true! I make it a point to give video lovers info about the vids. I'll download and preview and everything, even though I usually don't care much for them (unless they're to my exacting, eccentric specs). But hey, I'm writing a review.

So vid fans, please do us pic nuts a soler and provide the info. It's actually easier than vids, anyway. And hey, you're writing a review.

Thank you. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-17-09  11:10pm - 5697 days #13
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Ya know, come to think of it, I've never seen Cybertoad and Messmer in the same room at the same time.

Hmmmmm, is this some kind of Supertoad, Clark Pollywog thing?

Of course, I can't say that I've ever seen Drooler, Denner, Khan, Exotics or anybody else here - but still!


We're all one person, actually. Masters of Cyberguise. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-16-09  11:17am - 5699 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		(Wags tail. Licks face.) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-14-09  01:21pm - 5701 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Messmer, one of my favorite PUers! Hope to see you back in fine fettle in the not-too-distant future!

And I'll also regain your trust vote! I guess that's a form of collateral damage, eh? Oh, well. You've got to do what you've got to do. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on May 14, 2009, 02:38pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-10-09  02:37pm - 5705 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		I like it when they look at the camera and tell you that they want to fuck you, too. Or when they repeatedly say, "Feels good!" in their native language.

But I don't like the "digital scrambler" that hovers over and visually encrypts the naughty bits. That damn thing has no place in porn. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-10-09  10:16am - 5705 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Jeffrey99:


I've always heard Mac's are pretty much unhackable and unvirusable. However I really don't know if that's true. I've always told myself that when this pc dies, I'll be going Mac. But then you look at the prices and I don't know. For what I need it for, casual internet stuff mainly, is it really worth spending the extra money? Haven't decided yet.


Macs aren't as much at risk of viruses and hacks as PCs are, but they're not invulnerable. There was recently a Trojan that came out that specifically targeted Macs, though that one was on pirated copies of Mac software.

I once lost a bunch of data to a virus that exploited a security hole in Quicktime. That was maybe over 10 years ago, but it taught me never to take things for granted!

My Mac gets a regularly scheduled scan in off hours and virus updates as well. So far, no problems. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-09-09  02:26pm - 5706 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Well, thanks to the greedy and irresponsible powers that be, we've been fucked ... so we might as well try to fuck our way back to prosperity! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-09-09  03:50am - 5706 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Jay G:


After Star Trek and before the Star Trek Convention phenomenon, Shatner spent some time (as many actors do) living in his car. Residual checks were miniscule and acting jobs were not available to the "typecast" actor. The Trekie phenomena and the convention money saved his ass.

I like Shatner because he now realizes the pomposity of his own persona and can make fun of himself on the camera. He's clever enough to play the fool and play it well.


Yes, Shatner is over the top and tongue in cheek about it. Take those Priceline ads, for instance. Shatner parodies himself, and Priceline has an endorser that people find interesting. Funny who how much "layering" there is in those ads.

He's also interesting in his own right yet knows when to get out of his own way. I thought his interview of Jenna Jameson on "Shatner's Raw Nerve" was great. Both of them are truly interesting people.

I liked Toadsith's post of the Shatner quote. It sums up the attitude of people who strive to live "larger" than the rest of us. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-08-09  11:57pm - 5706 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		I do, but it's a machine that I use for personal business and no porn ever gets on it. Also, it's got an older OS on it, "Tiger," I think.

One thing I don't like about the Mac I got was the performance of the keyboard and mouse -- they're shit if you ask me -- but you can plug in a USB keyboard and mouse for a PC on it and it will do the same things for the most part. Keyboard commands will work a little differently but you can figure it out.

And the Mac will give you menus with the right mouse button! I use these a lot and therefore don't like the single-button mouse that comes with the Mac.

Another nice thing about the Mac is the optional color-labeling (right clickable) for files and apps. It helps me find things more quickly on the desktop. That's a Mac feature that's been around at least since system 8, maybe 7 (early '90's).

And searching for files on a Mac is blazing fast and pretty intuitive. Same goes for email messages. The search and find on a Mac leaves the PCs in the dust.

(BTW, in the "opposite way," I have an old, ca. 2001 Mac USB keyboard I use with a PC and it works fine, too.) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-07-09  04:01pm - 5708 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		This is helpful. I've only encountered .rar files on one site, but I didn't know that it was simply a matter of changing the file extension to .zip! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-07-09  12:34pm - 5708 days #51
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		I know. I keep answering my own thread. Why this time? Two words:

Sandee Westgate!

Wow!!

Just checked out the first set of her posted at Aziani. Staggering! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-06-09  01:03pm - 5709 days #21
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Khan:


We wrote the site asking that they address the virus problem so we can relist the site. Hoping to hear back from them shortly.

Where it comes to not exposing our users to viruses, we generally lean towards the "extra careful" side.


Thanks, Khan! I appreciate that. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-06-09  03:05am - 5709 days #19
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Khan:


I'll ask them to take another look at the join page. If we can relist it, we will.

As for the virus warning, it was from following a link on the main page. It showed a warning on at least 3 machines I know of.


Yes, I got a warning after clicking, on the bottom of the public home page, "Webmasters" and "FinestMoney.com." Said they had been reported as attack sites and were blocked.

They're not links that a subscriber would probably click, but keeping porn users safe from potential cyber threats is a good policy. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-05-09  01:22pm - 5710 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Khan:


Personally, I've always wondered why women's groups have allowed such an un-equal application of the law to be applied all these years. Glad to see change is starting to come about. Now if the FCC would get on board, we could start enjoying topless TV.

But again, I'm wondering how come I'm just now hearing about this?


LOL. It's been the "breast-kept" secret in years!

Maybe if the guys pitch in and help for a change, the women's groups won't have to do all of the work themselves! Housework, public toplessness ... yeah, I can see the parallels. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-04-09  02:40pm - 5711 days #17
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		I'd be giving it a "might recommend" to those who like softcore. Hardcore is moot.

If you don't mind about 75% of the photo content going no higher than 1024px, you'd probably like it a lot.

As for the vids, I haven't looked at any of those yet except for one of the video "confessions."

It does have a lot of content. Well, that's probably all I should say until if/when the site clears the hurtles for a listing. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-04-09  01:39pm - 5711 days #15
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Khan:


I just sent you an email on this one.

We used to list the site but pulled the listing (see email for details). The JOIN page still isn't working so we can't relist it at this time.

To anyone visiting the site, be aware our editors are seeing some virus warnings from at least one of the links on the site.

Sorry


FYI: I was able to join yesterday, through ccbill. For good measure, I just checked at ccbill and the subscription listing is there. Of course, I've been going through quite a bit of the site, too.

As for the virus warnings, I didn't get any and the autoscan done this morning has shown nothing amiss. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-04-09  02:16am - 5711 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Jeffrey99:


I will also be staying tuned. That site looks very interesting. So there will be atleast two of us waiting your review. :)


I've discovered that the site isn't listed at TBP, so I've put in a request. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-03-09  03:52am - 5712 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		BadAndy400 has said pretty much what I was going to say, which is that there aren't "networks" of purely softcore material, but instead there are "sister" sites which mostly require separate subscriptions.

When there are combination packages, long-term subscriptions are typically the norm.

A year-long commitment to MetModels I think will also yield 365 days of Errotica-Archives (yawn), but I think you have to get their offer in e-mail to do that.

Wait a second! Check out this page from FinestModels. That's a "network" list. I recall those being separate sites. They say they're "hi-rez," but I don't know if it's more like 89 octane or 94 ... Last time I was there, they were still 1024's or so. It has been quite a while.

Wait a second again! Now, they have 3 resolutions: 1024, 2048, and (nominally) 4368. It is a networkish kind of site, that lets you view everything in one site (FinestModels) or in the individual sites. NB: Not all of the photosets are bigger than 1024px.

Looks like I'll be writing a review fairly soon. There are some problems with this site, for one thing, but I'm just getting into it. Stay tuned ...

(And just to think: If Messmer hadn't posed the question, I wouldn't have re-investigated this site and found out how it has improved in at least some ways.) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on May 03, 2009, 04:43am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-01-09  01:41am - 5714 days #39
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


Drooler, I love ya! It worked like a charm. I put in jpg as a filter and the name of the model, unchecked everything else and then right clicked on a spot in between the thumbs of the set and started to download with that lovely Firefox add-on. Oh, yeah, I also set it to download "links" figuring that was probably a good idea! :-) And Bingo, I have two sets I had neglected because it was too much trouble to download them one by one.


Awright! Success! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-30-09  12:13pm - 5715 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Somehow I'm reminded of a joke about 2 guys that saw one of the gas stations just outside of town was having a contest. The sign said: "Fill up to enter our contest & win free sex!"

They filled up their tank and went inside to pay.

"How do we enter?" asked the first man.

"Well, I'm thinking of a number between one and 10," said the attendant. "If you guess right, you win free sex."

"OK, I guess seven, " said the first man.

"Sorry, I was thinking of eight," replied the attendant. "Come back soon and try again."

The next week, the two men returned to the same station to get gas. When they went inside to pay, the second man asked the attendant if the contest was still going on.

"Sure," replied the attendant. "I'm thinking of a number between one and 10. If you guess right, you win free sex."

"Two" said the second man

"Sorry, I was thinking of three," replied the attendant. "Come back soon and try again."

As they walked back to the car, the first man said to the second man "I'm beginning to think this contest is rigged."

"No, I don't think it is," said the second man.

"What makes you so sure?"

"Well, my wife won three times last week." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-30-09  12:04pm - 5715 days #30
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


Drooler could you please explain to this dummy how a download of a non-zipped picture set is possible with DownThemAll? I subscribe to ONE site that has non-zipped sets of one of my favorite models and I'll be darned if I know how to get them. The set is laid out neatly with small icons of the individual pictures but I have no idea how to set-up DownThemAll so that it will grab the whole set. It always ends up downloading one picture and I can't see a way of selecting them all. Please help a hopeless non-techie and don't think harshly of me! :-)


Messmer, I remember your confessing to being "unfaithful" to the PU site some time ago, but I've long since forgiven you. ;)

Actually, at Aziani, I recently had the same problem you describe. That site HAS zips, but they'd not put in a zip file for one set of Nikki Benz. I suppose they just forgot. I couldn't get it to work with DownLoadThemAll (DLTA). Wound up cherry picking the whole thing -- using their slide show option to make things (and my fingers) move quickly.

One problem could be frames. A frame is, in effect, an html page. Some sites will have 2 or more frames (different pages) on display together in a browser window. If you think that's the case, click in some dead spot in the frame that has the thumbs before starting DLTA. That might have been my problem with the Nikki Benz set. I can't guarantee it will work, but it's worth a try.

Also, in the "filters" part of the DLTA window, make sure that JPEG images is checked and nothing else is. (Nearly all pics of babes are JPEGs.)

Another site that doesn't let you DLTA is Rigin-Studio because each thumb links directly to another page (not an image file) which in turn links to an INDIVIDUAL enlargement. That's been thwarting my DLTA fun there. It sucks.

Maybe some other people here with real savvy can enlighten us both on how to overcome these problems. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-28-09  11:03pm - 5716 days #27
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Seems as though both Wittyguy and myself have made the switch to Firefox since this thread got started.

I've been happy with the speed of Firefox, plus the add-on DownLoadThemAll, which has made a few zip-'fraidy sites reasonably exploitable. Still, it's not perfect, but I'm pretty happy with it overall.

Still have a computer with IE6 on it, which I find easier to work with for sure than IE7 -- that was a bitch to configure and make sense of, but it's still there in case I need it.

One thing about switching browsers is that banking sites and such have to be "taught" that you're not an identity thief. Keep the answers to those questions about your favorite color and high school name handy! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-23-09  01:03pm - 5722 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Snot and nosepicking - for pornfetish.....jeeeez.
Too weird for me.
BTW: This seems so far out, but Wittyguy gives this thread the humor well placed and needed: "Nose Candy".


Yes, "Nose Candy" along with "Eye Candy" -- a truly, ummm, unique combination! LOL. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-22-09  11:35pm - 5722 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Nose picking! When a guy does it, it's gross. But when a hot babe does it, different story!! Women are amazing!

At least the niche has generated a "flicker" of excitement and interest in "NTM." What's next? Booger swapping? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-21-09  01:49pm - 5724 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Don't know if you've checked yet, Riffy, but in case you haven't, go to "user polls" here at PU and type "tour" as a keyword search. The results of six different polls on tours will be yours for the effort. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-21-09  01:43pm - 5724 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		"I am totally horny to get sperm and let myself be awake, while getting an ordinary loading of sperm - directly squirt in my face.*slobber*
And when I avidly lick my full-squirted lips and tase your hot cream, then I want only one thing - unrestrained and spoiled sex - best in all holes!!! *pant*"

Wish I knew German. Translation's a bitch! (I'd suggest changing "ordinary" to something else. "Spoiled," too.)

Oh, and "tase." What's the use of electrocuted cum? LOL. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-21-09  03:14am - 5724 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Thought I'd mention something somewhat related, though there's no hardcore and no zips: actiongirls.com. Shows women in dominant and/or "menacing" roles, mostly. Americans and Europeans; not many Asians. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited by Staff on Apr 21, 2009, 02:22pm (Khan: corrected URL)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-19-09  04:26am - 5726 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Drooler: What is this EroBerlin - tried to google the name, but only came up with a contact-link (is it called meeting-place)...


I first came across their "models wanted" page, which has a lot of preview pics. You'll see the eroberlin logo on those samples. The pics look nice! And it's all exclusive stuff.

One girl in particular, Chanel, just pops my nuts off. (She had been at ATK Galleria and a bit a MetArt, too.) Look at the one of her holding the tennis racket. DAMN, that girl has got curves like a motherfucker!

Used to be when I went to www.eroberlin.com, there was a page with a message that the site was going to open in spring. About 3 weeks ago, there were instead "joomla" pages for a site under construction; they were instructions to the users of the joomla website package, such as "choose your language."

And now it's just that login box. So I'm wondering where on earth the real homepage is? Maybe they're still setting up.

I haven't been this excited about a site in the making since sagestyle.net, and that was going to be a pay site, but then it changed into just an "I'm a photographer" contact and sample site. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 19, 2009, 04:35am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-19-09  02:16am - 5726 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


I find that I have great difficulty in allocating my monthly porn fund to a new site or two because it seems that I've seen it all before.

Just like the author of Ecclesiastes I find myself wailing: "Vanity, vanity, all is vanity. There is nothing new under the sun!"

No matter which tour I take .. ho hum .. haven't I seen this before. I am starting to envy collectors who chase after videos or picture sets of certain models they like, at least they have a goal ... while I don't have any favorites so I'm at a disadvantage.

I started with pictures and got tired of the sameness found in so many sets, then switched to Videos and found that only rarely would I come across a site where I didn't find scenes that I hadn't seen and downloaded dozens of times before.

If only lingerie played a larger role in modern porn. Or imagination. Or age. Or women photographers/interviewers.
Anything to give me back that WOW I seem to have lost somewhere.

I would exhort my fellow PUs to either go to new, exotic, previously unknown, unlisted sites and write a review in order to give me (us) an idea as to where to go next, or to share with me (us) the new, exotic, previously unknown sites that they are subscribing to already.

Help, I really need change! :-) I've become immune to the average offerings. Maybe I'm just like Danny Glover in the Lethal Weapons movies: "Man, I'm getting too old for this shit!" Shudder, that's too horrible to even contemplate!

messmer, watching sadly as one subscription after the other expires without a replacement. :-)


Messmer, you describe the same thing I've gone/been going through. But the plus of it all is that you raise your standards and narrow your focus.

Tastes vary, but I think you should check out FuckedHard18 for hardcore. The girls really do get into it. I just got done viewing vids of Kagney Lynn Carter and Jessica Valentino, there, and I must say I'm impressed!

For softcore posing, I'm still awaiting the official launch of EroBerlin. When I try the URL, all I get is a usepass box. Can't seem to find any real homepage to start with. They said they'd launch in spring. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-18-09  03:07pm - 5727 days #12
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Not every site, though almost every one that I think deserves prominence. Thing is, sometimes other reviewers do the job well and often enough that I don't need to add in my 2 cents. MetArt for instance. It's probably overall my favorite site, but I've yet to review it.

Like PinkPanther and Ik2FireOne, I get tired and/or I just don't think the site is worth bothering with. Any review, even a bad one, might generate interest, so I actually decide NOT to give a site "air time" if I think it's unsatisfactory (e.g., small collection and no updates).

And I've reviewed a lot of mediocre to bad sites anyway. Frankly, it's rather embarrassing to toss even more of them on the pile.

Then there are those sites that I don't think I can give an impartial review of. Don't think I could review SimonScans. It's toys to the max! (I haven't been a member for something like 2 years.) I get tired of complaining about toy sites, and people are probably sick of my pointless grousing, so I'm trying to avoid any more of that.

Finally, I've written reviews only to find that certain sites I've praised have changed for the worse. I sometimes try to put in a comment, if not an addendum in the review, about the problem. This is something of a headache, and it makes me think twice (sometimes, anyway) about penning the next review. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 18, 2009, 03:23pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-15-09  12:45pm - 5730 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Yes, she's done a bit of hardcore. One's at DreamStash. You might need to scroll down a bit. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-15-09  04:30am - 5730 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Check out Ariel's Blog, which is her own website. It's not bad! You can read the forum posts as a visitor, too. She answers regularly. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-13-09  10:00pm - 5731 days #13
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Award for worst porno ever: Billy Mays and Vince from Sham WoW going at it and then arguing about who's product does a better a job of removing the felch from Billy's beard. Gives me shivers just to even type this. Then again, it would probably cause people to start watching infomercials more often ;)


Wittyguy, now about those meds you were talking about ...

;) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-13-09  09:54pm - 5731 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		One reason why so few webmasters come in for discussions is, I think, that they're just too busy. They have a business to keep going in a very competitive market -- now during an huge economic downturn. If the "webmaster" really means the manager of the site, and sometimes it does, then there are all kinds of things and people to deal with. Plus they have their own forums on some sites. It adds up to a a lot day-to-day. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-12-09  03:25pm - 5733 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Ah yes, the "FYC". Perhaps it should be re-acronymed as TFYC for "the famous yellow couch". That way, we can commission The Village People to come out of retirement and do a song about it ("You can go banging on the TTTT-FFFF-YYYY-CCCC"). Drooler can dress up in his favorite cowboy outfit and feel right at home singing along with the oldies updated ;)

I think I first saw the TFYC either on Paul Markham Teens or on the Babelicious network a few years ago. I almost cringe when I see it now knowing how abused it's been. Have you ever tried to clean any stains out of a leather couch? It's a bitch man. Maybe we can get Billy Mays to sign onto our project as spokesperson for his next miracle cleaning product .... maybe "KUM-BOOM: It gets the jizz out!" Maybe I need to start taking my meds again.


You know, I never did understand why "YMCA" was such a big hit, but I do appreciate the parody idea. Check out www.whatfreaks.com. It's a great place to post lewd song parodies.

Yes, the Famous Yellow Couch holds a distinction enjoyed by only an elite few amongst home furnishings. I've commented on its supporting roles and cameos at Uniform Sensations (9/30/07), Eve Angel (3/22/08), and Stunners (6/29/08). Denner has done quite a bit of reporting on its whereabouts also.

Who knows? Perhaps Billy Mays DOES do a TV ad for "Jizz-Off" or some similarly branded post-coital cleanup agent. I'm usually asleep at that hour.

I do like the name "KUM-BOOM!" better, though. It's perfect for the American market.

Hey, just a apply it with a fresh "Sham-WOW" and you'll have no trouble letting your next guest sit there where the wet spot used to be. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 12, 2009, 03:32pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-11-09  03:12am - 5734 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I think some of the "Behind The Scenes" can be interesting. Maybe they show some details of how the vid or photo shoot were set up, maybe there's some model background/interviews. If you like a particular model, it's a chance to see a flash of what's she's like outside of a photo shoot or video. At least that's that the idea behind an interview, but most interviews are often canned bullshit. But we can still fantasize, can't we?


I tend to go the same way as lk2fireone and Toadsith on this. I wonder, "What's she like" in the non-shoot-shoot context?

It's like this: When I hit a BTS thing, I'll think, "oh, what a waste of time and money," but then I think about how I might incorporate the material into my personal fantasies. Sometimes it works out.

As Toadsith said, there are a lot of airheads in porn (I'm paraphrasing), but some of them have a lot of personality and some of them are pretty smart, too.

It also helps that I do this with pics, so I can imagine the girls to be any way I want (no sound). But the thread, as I know, is about BTS in videos -- making this response completely irrelevant! ;-) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-10-09  12:44am - 5735 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Some of it I've seen, so it's not all-exclusive. That is what some of us have been calling the "famous yellow couch" material.

I can't recall at which site I started collecting "FYC" content, but it was mostly pics. Not bad stuff. And you have to start somewhere ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-08-09  04:01pm - 5737 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Khan:


Just wondering what you guys thought of this one?

UK launches massive, one-year program to archive every email

"The data retention rules require the archival of all email traffic (the identities of the sender and receiver, but not the contents of the messages), records of VOIP telephone calls (traditional phone calls are already monitored), and information about every website visited by any computer user in the country." (emphasis mine)

see http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/136610 for full story


The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.

This program puts a new twist on it.

And "not the contents" of the messages? Believe that? I sure don't. I'd think the content would be the first point of interest to a gov't; then come the senders and receivers.

And how is this massive archival being funded during our world economic crisis? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-08-09  02:02am - 5737 days #86
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


Just wanted to touch on this part Drooler, my own time away from PU on other forums over the years, I was just used to when I see a name in quotes in a post by another member, that the post is directed at who is in the quote box in the post.


OK, exotics. Sarcasm from you is OK. If you prefer to ignore my intentions and my explanations of what I'm saying and about whom, fine.

If you really want to present yourself here as a stuck up hypocrite who can't get off his high horse, well, that's you. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-09  02:20pm - 5738 days #73
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


Nothing to do with Porn DVDs but interesting just the same. I just came across this while I was looking for the article that promoted the view that men like big breasts because they long to return to Mommy's teats! :-)

Breast Implants Don't Solve Underlying Self-esteem Issues
By John M. Grohol, Psy.D.
September 21, 2006

A study conducted among 24,600 women by two University of Laval Faculty of Medicine researchers and their colleagues from the Canadian Public Health Agency and Cancer Care Ontario concludes that having breast implants does not increase mortality risk.

However, the study reveals that the suicide rate among women with breast implants is 73% higher than in the general population. These findings are published in a recent issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology.

This finding is not surprising, since many women seek out breast enhancement surgery for reasons of low self-esteem or because they lack self-confidence. They believe that the surgery will create a new person that they can then build upon. All too often, however, the surgery only highlights the flaws in the person's life, as they cope with the pain and recovery of the surgery on their own.

Previous studies have observed that the psychological profile of women who receive breast implants is characterized by low self-esteem, lack of self-confidence, and more frequent mental illnesses such as depression.

Ethical doctors should refer women who have such problems to a therapist or psychologist for treatment before undertaking plastic surgery. Plastic surgery cannot treat a lack of self-confidence or depression.


Doesn't surprise me that cosmetic surgery does not resolve low self-esteem. There's probably a "euphoria" stage after recovery from a successful surgery ... then the demons within return and the torment resumes. The "you're not good enough" demons.

Somewhere along the way, I learned that I have a mind, and that my mind is capable of all kinds of nasty mischief. It took understanding that what my mind is saying to me about myself is just stuff, a lot of negative stuff, collected over the years. After an earlier life that featured a lot of self-loathing, I managed to shift my attention to other things, like helping other people and just learning things. The nasty stuff of self-hatred gradually just fades away due to the inattention to it. This can take years.

So cosmetic surgery, or even new clothes, isn't the answer. Something more like Zen would be better. And that doesn't necessarily mean sitting and chanting and meditating. It does mean exploring the nature of "reality" and how it gets created.

Well, let's see what kind of responses this will draw, if any.

Please don't make me hate myself. (LOL) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-09  01:09am - 5738 days #66
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA 		Originally Posted by Drooler:
Ever meet a women who was "beautiful" physically but not inwardly? I don't find them at all attractive.
But that still doesn't mean that I don't (nor that you don't) objectify the woman. "Her beauty is the object of my desire." Say that and, BANG!, it's even in the language! Proof positive!

I wonder how it is for male peacocks. Are they just pawns in the game, foolishly displaying their plumage to their less endowed female counterparts, not realizing that it's all "objectification" that's going to protect the species from extinction?


Originally Posted by exotics4me:


To me Drooler, this is where you really start going off the topic and showing what I guess is sarcasm. As a matter of fact, up to here, I really couldn't tell what was sarcasm and what wasn't. It did however let me know that for some reason, you thought my post was negative about men.


The first paragraph above was to demonstrate the kind of language "evidence" used in the arguments I've heard that men objectify women. The second paragraph was to make the point that across species, each gender has its ways of trying to attract the other for the purposes of mating or at least sex; which is to say that it's part of nature. I think that feminists, while noble in their advocacy of women, come across as naive when they say that men objectify women when in fact the women are trying to get the men by making themselves look attractive.

And so, true, it wasn't directly on topic, but it wasn't off the broader issue of "objectification," which you raised. Sometimes you thought I was saying that you meant certain things; I did try to make it clear early in my long post that I had things to say about the issue of objectification.

Anyway, I can still understand how you might have thought I meant you; I didn't say "This doesn't refer to exotics per se."

As for everything else, I'm just going to leave it be. I think the whole discussion is getting kinda hairy and there's just so much craziness I can take at one time!

Besides, while I have my viewpoints and opinions, these are big social issues and I find it hard to discuss them without becoming a poor communicator about what I mean, what I think others mean, etc. etc. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-05-09  04:13am - 5740 days #44
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


I'm glad my wife doesn't have an account here. Mainly because she wouldn't know how to type out caveman grunts that she was making after reading this thread.

Seriously guys, read some of your posts in this thread, I think the overall forum's open-mindedness scale just dropped. Women should ask men before doing something to their body? Key word being, "Their" body?

I also can't help but wonder how the young woman who just bought implants because she had self-image problems, feels about being called a mutilation?

Opinions are one thing guys, using derogatory words is another one. This thread, not all of it, but a good portion of it is a field day for a psychologist, and the sad thing is, I don't even think some of you realize how much this thread proves that some men look at women as nothing more than objects.


Well, taking things in context, the thread IS about whether or not women should have their breasts enhanced. Now, if that makes us objectifiers of women, let's at least keep in mind that women discuss this matter as well, and some go on to having their boobs "inflated," so we'd have to admit that they "objectify" themselves, which in truth they do sometimes. They want to draw the attention of men.

I don't know if the sentiment here against implants proves anything one way or another vis-a-vis the issue of men objectifying women. If someone wants to grind the axe, they can accomplish this on either side of the cutting edge.

But I'd like to get further into this oft heard claim that men objectify women. I think if you treat another human being as an object, it means that you use the person for your own purposes as if that person is not really a complete human being. Same goes for groups of people, like women. Or men, for that matter.

Where to begin? Could it be argued that Picassco's "Nude Descending a Staircase" is an objectification? What about the "Mona Lisa?" Was Da Vinci objectifying himself?

Then there's advertising. Ohhhh, boy. Well, to give one example: Those pills that supposedly make a man "larger." Are women, and men as well, objectifying the male? I'm not sure about that.

What about women who marry men because the men are wealthy? Surely this happens. The guy could be the nicest guy in the world, but take away the financial assets and some women will drop him and go for another. These women care for wealth more than they care for the man.

But you don't see men whining about being treated as "financial objects." Not if they know how to have a good time.

Anyway, some people use other people. But being very appreciative of female beauty, and for my own preference, natural beauty without breast implants, does that mean that I'm objectifying women? Exotics, have you just been objectifying Eve Angel all of these years, or is that you see something beautiful in a non-physical way that emanates from that woman?

I think you do. I think that beauty is something starts from the inside, and all of the cosmetics and skin care and time at the gym serves the purpose of making that inner beauty easier to see. A woman who is happy with her own looks (her body, which is a physical object) is more likely to project that inner beauty.

Ever meet a women who was "beautiful" physically but not inwardly? I don't find them at all attractive.
But that still doesn't mean that I don't (nor that you don't) objectify the woman. "Her beauty is the object of my desire." Say that and, BANG!, it's even in the language! Proof positive!

I wonder how it is for male peacocks. Are they just pawns in the game, foolishly displaying their plumage to their less endowed female counterparts, not realizing that it's all "objectification" that's going to protect the species from extinction?

Well, this claim that men objectify women has gone on for years, and it's just too clever by half. It oversimplifies (and insults) men, it oversimplifies life, and it oversimplifies nature. Sometimes, it's an implicit justification for misandry. After all, if you're complaining about the misogyny that you see all around you, you'd better cloak your hatred of men in something defensive.

So why not claim that men objectify women? As if you just KNOW that men are, categorically, that simple, one-dimensional, and despicable.

Right.

And maybe, just maybe, when a man sees beauty in a woman it's because he recognizes something that dwells in himself.

Oh, I think I know what that might be: The "Objectifier Region" of the brain. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 05, 2009, 04:31am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-04-09  12:17pm - 5741 days #12
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I have joined a few sites for multi-month subscriptions and found it to be lower priced (at least in comparing average monthly costs to 1 month deals) and more relaxing; you can take your libido out of overdrive and wade through the content at your leisure instead of trying a month long mad dash to download as much content as possible. Also, if a site teases you with promises of future updates outside your one month, you have even more to look forward to over the course of your subscription.

That being said, there are sites (and foods) you only want to try once, and anything over a month just doesn't seem to make sense, especially the smaller sites with few updates.


Yes, Turboshaft sums it up well. The sites that I have found most rewarding of sustained, often 1-year memberships are MetArt, FemJoy, and MetModels. But even with those, once a year's up, I'll wait a month or two before rejoining just to feel I'm getting even "extra" time for my money.

Yet I have nagging worries about just how much longer these sites will be updating. The same goes for HegreArt, which nearly ranks up there with those others.

So I'm going to join those less often, but at what are the same effective monthly rates.

I do the "wait, raid 'n quit" in cyclical fashion with some other sites: ATK Galleria, ATK Exotics, MPL Studios, and Nakedby. The cycles are, respectively, shorter to longer for that list because of the rate of updates and also my tastes (e.g., Nakedby has more fetish or "artistic" stuff that I'll pass over.)

And the ATK sites have recently become, well, boring! The girls strip for a longer time, spend fewer moments au naturelle, and the "proper" (my term) booty views are in shorter and shorter supply. ATK Galleria has recently resumed with the model Katie Jordin, who to my eyes is one of the most beautiful girls on the planet. But so far, their new content of her just doesn't quite cut it for picky-picky me.

I think they've got a new bunch of photographers, and sorry, but those cats just aren't the "meow" that, say, Russ T was. Now that guy knew what to shoot and how to shoot it.

So I like sites like allow me to get new content nearly every day at my libidinous leisure. There aren't many of those.

However, when I do rejoin a site after being away for some time, I go at it like a hound dog and won't stop with the catching up until either 1. I've brought myself up to the present or 2. I'm so tired that I can't look at the computer anymore. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 04, 2009, 12:32pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

1401-1450 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 8 14 20 28 Page 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.

Loaded in 0.05 seconds.