Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Drooler (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1831)  |   Threads Started (45)

951-1000 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 6 10 14 19 Page 20 21 24 27 30 36 37 Next Page >

05-09-10  02:46am - 5341 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Awwww, shit! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

05-08-10  02:52am - 5342 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


We compare products more than experiences, and since products are doomed to not be the best we could ever have got, we are sad. When we don&#65533;t compare, we are happy.


Yes, the products are doomed not to be the best we could have ever got! Maybe we'd have written fewer reviews, having joined fewer sites, having less need to search for better ones, had the sites we'd joined earlier been the best possible.

In other words, product mediocrity is good for the economy. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

05-06-10  01:38pm - 5344 days #13
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I remember during the Bush II years being told that the United States was regarded with contempt throughout Europe. I didn't believe it then. It was just too much of an overgeneralization, and the people saying it were presuming me to be more ignorant than I actually was.

Besides, if that were true, what were they doing here? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

05-02-10  04:27pm - 5348 days #20
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by yadayada321:


I find it quite weird myself... it's like seeing a guy masturbate and then licking and smelling his hand afterwards hahahahahaha .


I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

05-02-10  04:24pm - 5348 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Goldfish, I'm in complete agreement with you about Fucked Hard 18. It is the best hardcore site. I just love the approach, and the girls are fantastic!

In my humble fucktard opinion, of course. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

05-02-10  04:21pm - 5348 days #15
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


This will be it.


Yeah, right. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

05-01-10  03:12am - 5349 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I don't usually get toy masturbation videos, though I do have a few. Mostly I get pics. After I download, I quickly survey them in thumbnail mode in windows and select and discard the ones of the girl mouthing the plastic penis.

I don't see the point of those pics. I suppose we're supposed to think "my penis in her mouth" when the girl applies partial vacuum to the colorful, injection-molded bit of future environmental threat, but to me, it's "Why the hell would anyone suck on a piece of plastic?" I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-29-10  03:44pm - 5351 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by badandy400:


Paid to sit at work and is every one of our dreams. They should just say they were checking them for illegal content.


Not my dream. Never would be. I'd be ashamed to have a job where I just clocked in and got paid for sitting on my ass. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-28-10  05:28pm - 5351 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Hmm...I guess it all depends on how one defines the term "customer's consent"--one of the slipperiest of slopes in the modern world if you ask me. For example, how many people ever stop and read the visitor/customer agreements on adult websites before hastily clicking "Yes!" in a horny fury of puerile curiosity and wonder? For all I know I've "consented" to some questionable clauses, it's just that I've never taken the time to read and think them through.

Pre-checked cross sales are the logical step under these circumstances and they seem to happen in plenty of other places as well. I recently bought some tickets to an upcoming concert through one of the big national ticket retailers/monopolies (okay, maybe the ticket monopoly)--a $25 ticket price with an additional $6+ in "convenience" and "service" fees that you only see at the last step before you're about to pay!

Or think of all the agreements you click through to install software--what's the point if you already bought the damn program?! I guess one more binding agreement to keep you from even thinking of ever getting any kind of compensation from a corporation if something ever goes wrong with its products/services.

Either way you're stuck being basically forced to "consent" to a lot more than you should have to and companies looking to soak up of every penny of yours they can get their hands on. I guess you pay through an unknown billing company at your own peril and damn the consequences.



BTW, I doubt Bernie is making license plates or doing much work of any kind in prison, as I have heard that he's in a minimum security white collar prison.


Yeah, you get pre-checked cross sales from anti-virus companies ("Download insurance" -- what a load of bullshit that is!) and from the credit bureaus.

Think Uncle Sam is interested in representin'? Well, NOT US! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-24-10  05:28am - 5356 days #42
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Funny you should say that, Drooler - but oh, yes driving can be a bore. But it certainly depends on WHERE! And the USA is my absolute favorite - it's all in the scenery. The wife and I drives maybe a couple of thousand miles almost each year through Europe going from north to south of France or Spain - and it's tiresome in many ways - the drive (but not when you get there)..
NEVER experienced that 'tiresome' when driving across the USA or up and down ect - plus parts of beautiful Canada. The view, the scenery going through Monument Valley, deep south in Arizona and hitting a motel in the town of Tombstone, Death Valley, around Mount Shasta, along the Mississippi (in more states), along the Rio Grande in Texas (and getting to the weird town of Presidio), the bended backroads of West Virginia and even along the Gulf Coast of Florida, The Keys ect. ect.
Man, you guys just got a heck of a beautiful Nation over there!



Thanks, Denner. I was thinking more "vacant desert expanse," but I didn't really make myself that clear on the point. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-22-10  03:43pm - 5358 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


lol hmmm I didnt see that one I am sifting carefully but must have slipped by me.


Yes, it skipped by you. Just as you were about to see it, it sped up and *POOF!* . . . it escaped notice. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-22-10  03:41pm - 5358 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Sammie Rhodes ... wow! Number one on that list, if you ask me. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-22-10  01:53pm - 5358 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Bree Daniels is one for sure. There's stuff to come of her at ALS Scan. This new girl "Candace" at ATK Galleria is another. And they're just hot women anyway.

Oh, and Valerie Rios! Same comment. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-22-10  12:09pm - 5358 days #32
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Hey Ze Droolah
Thanks, buddy. And oh yes, did that testdriving for a while - but in the long run writing about cars get boring..



I'd think the long drives would get boring, too. One drive across an expanse of an entire continent is something I'd have only one of in myself for life. I could say I'd done it, and that would be that. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-21-10  08:07pm - 5358 days #19
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Hey Denner,
Your English keeps getting better. (Just read his posts from 3 years ago compared to now.) I thought you were a test driver who did things like drive prototypes across the Sahara, but I guess that actually feeds into the journalistic writing.

I didn't know you were a journalist, but it figures since you show a strong interest in language.

Sincerely Yours,

Ze Dwoolah I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-21-10  03:52pm - 5359 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
The next time the woman you're with asks you in a harsh tone, "Just what is it that you want?" just pause a moment, reflectively, then look her straight in the eye and say:

"Just two things. Steak ... and a blowjob." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-20-10  03:14pm - 5360 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky:


7-zip is the program I downloaded. However, right clicking does not bring up this option on the menu. There is an "open" button, but no "open with" button. Clicking open just tells me that "Windows cannot open this file."

Could it be the file is corrupted? It is right size-wise, at over 4 megs. BUT...downloading several HD vids from this site has presented some strange problems too. The vid once dl'd will say it is 300 some-odd megs, but when you go to play it, it jumps to fifteen minutes into the vid and you can't play the first fifteen minutes even by fishing around with the progress button. Plus, most of this site's HD vids will not download. You get a little icon that says it's 347 bits in size. I've dl'd thousands of vids from other sites so it's not something I'm doing wrong on my end.

Scathing review to come shortly!! This guy runs a real user-unfriendly site, though the girls are gorgeous.


Sometimes a file download will fail and you have to try again, but I think you already did! I know 'cause I'll get that tiny file size and know that it didn't succeed. I usually just "replace" the unsuccessful "runt" file with the second download attempt. (Has happened to me sometimes with Penthouse zips, for example.) But if it just continues to fail, as you say, it's not on your end of it. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-20-10  02:48pm - 5360 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I've been using 7-zip to uncork the .rar bottles ever since Messmer recommended it. It's freeware and it's easy on your system.

1. Download the file
2. Right click on the file and choose 7-zip
3. Choose "Extract files ..."
4. Let it do its stuff

It has also opened zips that the built-in Windoze utility couldn't handle. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-18-10  10:36am - 5362 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


I find the solo-girl sites are the best places to find great tight asses. I'm definitely an ass fan and definitely not in the bigger-is-always-better camp when it comes to asses.


The Panther's right. To me, the best sites for ass that's not "bootyliciously" beyond are MetArt, MetModels, FemJoy, TorridArt, HegreArt ... HEY! This is starting to sound like my top-ten list.

I've found that "speciality" niche butt sites are the WORST! Even InTheCrack could do better and do poses like the ones on the above-mentioned sites. (Of course, they NEVER do!)

But they can keep the "pardon me, is that your undercarriage?" closeups and anal-toy stickups if they want to. I wouldn't want anyone to be deprived of the freak show. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-17-10  11:08pm - 5362 days #16
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by yadayada321:


I'm more interested to know what sites are in your guy's top 10? Any hidden gems?


I'll try (in no particular order):
MetArt
MetModels
FemJoy
FuckedHard18
Twistys
TorridArt
MPL Studios
AvErotica
ALS Scan
Hegre-Art

They aren't the best sites, perhaps, but I keep going back to them. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-17-10  03:05pm - 5363 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
ALS Scans and MetArt are the only ones I'd agree with. And Exotics is right that Suicide Girls is a strange one considering our aversion to excessive tats.

And I'm like Denner; I don't pay much attention to those Top 10 lists. It's not like they're ever going to tell me what my own likes should be, any more than Top 40 radio did. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-17-10  02:58pm - 5363 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Pink Panther is right about the general suckiness of porn parodies. Probably the worse one I ever saw was "11," a takeoff on "10." (For those of you who remember when Bo Derek was the hottest woman on the planet.) "11" was like a 3 as a porn-flick. Forget the parody!

But I think that the Hustler parodies are OK for a chuckle. "This Ain't Star Trek" and "This Ain't the Munsters" and so on. Besides ... Jenna Haze is in them! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-17-10  11:59am - 5363 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I'm pretty sure the first place I saw Lela Star was at ATK Galleria. She didn't have that back tat, nor did she sport those balloons. She had such sparkle! I feel sorry for her now. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-16-10  05:34pm - 5363 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I was going down Memory Lane and recalled this one, which still is "up" but not really running (no longer joinable): prettylilpanties.

Didn't have zips, but had some great exclusive softcore stuff of Kirsten Price/Jadra Holly. I joined it once, back in Nov. 2005.

Too bad that stuff can't be put back on the market.

Even better was this site called Superlicious. Had a LOT of exclusive content, usually at 3000 px (photos of course) of several of those darling Euro babes like Mili Jay and Klara/Zoe. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 16, 2010, 05:38pm

04-15-10  02:51pm - 5365 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
This is a subject that is near and dear to my heart. There are some sites that went dark but had really good original content. I think it should reappear somewhere. Pure Beauty Magazine was one. Denude Art didn't last but a few months, but had some great stuff. Same goes for the penultimate version of VirtuaGirl, though that should be in 2000 px, not their old 1190 or smaller.

And then there are the solo model sites, which I believe are the most likely not to get licensed out, though I can't say why, should there even be one particular reason. Linda O'Neil had some wonderful stuff, though the pics were published in only 800 pixels. Sanja Matice did most of her enormous collection at 1600, though she had 3000 px photos that she only published once a week on an ad hoc basis.

Would be nice to see all of that stuff again. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-15-10  12:19pm - 5365 days #12
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


What is this, Ze Droolah - a lack in my porn-education - it seems - always thought that the Aziani-site was an 'only Aziani' - deal. Man, you certainly go wrong now and then - a lot of other fine models here according to the preview - and NOW - even Little (not so little any more) Lupe. And a very fair price, too...
Have to check it out - and, oh, BTW: Has much content of Lupe there?.........do you know?



Oh, you don't lack porn education. Just consider this a professional seminar ...

If you look at the individual models at Aziani, they show how many galleries and videos they have of her. Lupe has a few, I know, along with many other lovely girls, and some not-so-appealing ones, too. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-15-10  01:51am - 5365 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
There's some nice stuff of her at Aziani. She's sooo CUTE! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-13-10  04:30pm - 5367 days #16
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by badandy400:


Yes, that is the thread I find after it being mentioned. Obviously Exotics won the bout.

I have never actually seen I user use their point standing to try to belittle another. So I do not think of it much and do not associate the word elite with that sort of meaning.

So what....we are not going to start measuring our cocks? It is a good thing I think this little guy might give me a run for my money.


Well, maybe next time you'll be more careful about jumping the gun. After all, one needs to know what it's loaded with. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-13-10  11:42am - 5367 days #14
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by badandy400:


Drooler, I had not noticed 350z's encounter with Exotics. At times I think we can be a little harsh on new users, but usually it is in a friendly manor. So in this case, not regular user did anything wrong. Where was this encounter he had with Exotics? Perhaps there was more to this story than I thought....

Yes 350z was one user, but it has happened before. It is something that does not happen frequently fortunately, but none the less it has happened.

"Elite" is not a good word, I forgot that it is associated with the "I am better than you" attitude in some users eyes. Nothing ill meant by that usage. I only mean users that have seen their share of good and bad reviews.

Since I trust you guys that have responded thus far I will retract my defense of 350z, but his review was still good and that is what I noticed. When I seen his review all I seen was a one sided attack.

As for the "Bitch Slaps", they stay because they ruined a good review. But, based on your input, I reserve the right to give one to 350z for his other actions! Anyone who pisses of Exotics needs a few sessions on his couch.

yadayada321, glad to hear it. No slapping coming your way.

Squirrel I agree to an extent. There was a lot of shill reviews coming in and I know how much that sucks. I know it can make it hard to even look at a review from a new member. We just need to try to give them the benefit of the doubt. We were all new at one point.

One thing worth mention is that this is a topic that I am a little more anal about. I happened to be one of those users that caught a lot of flack when I first joined. My 100 review of Videobox turned some heads and resulted in a difference of preferences battle. So bare with me if I seem to be coming on a little strong. See, now I am having flashbacks!


The "PU independence/integrity" thread is what I was referring to (350z vs. exotics).

BTW, I remember when Roseman used to very blatantly talk up his points in comparison to mine and was very "elitist" about it, which I thought was a great combination of hilarious and pathetic. You probably don't remember that because it was off in a PU corner somewhere. But most of us aren't going to strut like roosters just because we're experienced at being crazy about porn. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-13-10  02:25am - 5367 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by badandy400:


We have asked many times why this great place is not growing faster than it is. There may be a simple answer, we are chasing new members away.

I am posting this mostly in regards to the recent 350z who wrote a single review before disabling his account. He review was for miss hybrid and was actually a pretty good review. I honestly wish that more first time reviewers could put as much thought into their reviews. It was well rounded and explained all the major points so that a user could form their own opinion of the site.

He was then hazed by two users who in effect called him a spam. One even said he would be interested to see if someone such as 350z would go on to write another review. Well obviously he will not be and I can not say i blame him. He caught a lot of flack for no apparent reason.

This was a prime example of how a new member comes along and gets chased away after trying to contribute. Fortunately I can say that the PU Elite are off the hook, at least for this case. The two who took it upon themselves to rid us of this new user that should good potential were actually newbies themselves. One having 6 points and the other 0 for reviews.

I know that we do get shill reviews here and that is something that we can be on the watch for. The fact that these sort of reviews get removed and questioned helps keep this place useful and alive. People still need a chance to speak their mind and answer questions about it.

If PU is to grow into the online porn communities it has the potential to be we must not get so defensive every time a new face is seen in town.


Frankly, I'm incredulous at the charge that the longer-term members are being harsh on the newbies, based on what you've said.

First, 350z was but one user. Let's not overgeneralize.

Two, 350z was but one user who got into a fracas with exotics4me. If you read their exchange, you'll notice that it got pretty nasty, and 350z got to the point of saying some very hard things that amounted to accusing exotics of being a big phony.

Mind you, I'm not going to say that one was right and one was wrong, and I'm not going to run to the defense of either of them. They both chose to get uncivil about it.

Just the same, 350z was getting support from other members on the same thread, especially before he turned nasty, by turns, with one particular member.

Finally, 350z made his own choice to leave. Some people do, and some people don't. And some get pissed off, disable, but later come back. There's more than one way to express oneself when under attack. It can be, "You MADE me quit!" or it can be, "You're not getting rid of me no matter what you do!" I don't think exotics is all that scary. I wouldn't say that he made 350z quit PU.

There's a timeline on which people join. Some people establish a reputation, sure. But I don't regard "newbies" as anything other than those who have come at a different time than others. They should be welcomed, of course, but they're not babes in the PU Forest. They're like the rest of us lot; some are friendlier and more mature than others. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-11-10  05:34pm - 5368 days #58
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


The problem is that most of us have a hard time believing that these people are paying 30$ a month to access what is still a very small site withouth thinking colusion instead of friendship. A true friend should be the first person that you can hope will be honest with you. I had issues with the high score because it did not equal to what was written. I noticed that more info was added to one of the review and I was glad for it, but what followed in the forum has left a biter taste in mouth.


I had a hard time believing all myself, too. Two fantastically-scored reviews a day apart and then one about 20 days later, at a lower 90. It's not hard to work up a decent long con, with enough of the right kind of participation (e.g., other reviews, etc.) to develop credibility.

Of course, I have no proof of any collusion, so I can't make any accusations, and I'm not making any. But I don't need proof to have suspicions, and my suspicions will suffice. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-11-10  02:42pm - 5369 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by mbaya:


It is obvious that webmasters can and do come here with an agenda. Further, that is not really wrong. I think we all agree that we have to keep their input at a level that doesn't damage the integrity of PU. That being said, I see nothing wrong with responding to them or their members if they cross the line of blatant biased commercialism and/or civility. However, I have seen posts recently about preferring not to respond. If we don't, they control this site. I think we cannot let another similar situation get out of hand as this one did. If we don't support the site as well as each other, we cease to have a community here. I know most of us do not want to rehash recent events, but if we don't discuss this topic now, will we do it in the middle of the next controversy? I propose polite questioning of what seems to be shills and let them act immaturely if they want to. If they do, we MUST support each other. Yes?


Well, consider this: If we do respond in kind and continue to do so once the level of the discussion has descended into carping and mudslinging, they control the discussion as much as we do and not for good reasons as far as I can see. You can either be one of the "energizers" of the "riot" or you can find better things to do. A riot is no longer a riot once it dwindles down to, say, two or three people.

We can't support each other in having a civil tone of discourse while we're out there "supporting" each other in kicking the asses of the nasty.

The moment I saw Miss What's-Her-Name's baiting thread title about us "experts" becoming porn webmasters, I knew that she was out to make trouble, and I didn't care a whit to help out. I just answered as factually and succinctly as I could, hoping for the best, and then stayed out of it.

How dirty lowdown could the whole thing have gotten if we'd all done it that way?

I mean, nobody attacked me, and I hadn't attacked anybody. Figure that! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 11, 2010, 02:57pm

04-11-10  05:54am - 5369 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Hey, RB, I've never held your rage against you. If I did, we'd probably both suffer from severe friction burns ...

But all joking aside, I think that "Raging Buddhist" is one of the most colorful monikers here at PU. I don't get the "Buddhist" part about you personally, but to me the obvious conceptual clash of "rage" and "Buddhism" amounts to a very original and oxymoronic expression of our tragic human condition. When enlightened, all is clear and we become indistinguishable from those things that "made" us angry. Trouble is, such clarity (and harmony) is evasive! We're too easily overcome once again by our inner demons, which are -- in a flash -- triggered by the demons that dwell in others.

You know, like that last asshole who gave you a hard time at work just because he could get away with it.

Anyway, to me "Raging Buddhist" is simply brilliant. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-11-10  04:13am - 5369 days #29
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I for one am just going to ignore Miss Hybrid from now on. I'm really sick of all of the childish drama. Let's move on. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-11-10  02:39am - 5369 days #14
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by BadMrFrosty:


I mainly use Firefox 3.6.3 which while still not as fast as Chrome and Safari, is a vast improvement over FF 3.5 and IE.

The increase in speed plus the wealth of available addons make it, for me anyway, the best choice. For work I also have to test pages in all of the other popular browsers which is where FF addons really help out. For example, IE Tab allows you to open a tab within FF that users IE rendering engine, Open In Chrome does something simular except it opens a new Chrome window for link that you want to test in Chrome.

The real bane of my life is IE (6,7 and 8 ) they are slow, tend to ignore 90% of web standards but a lot of companies refuse to let their employees to use anything else which quite often means having to do 2 or more versions of website interface code to work with them. I'm very interested in what MS have done with IE 9, its a hell of a lot faster (pretty close to Chrome speeds) and also more compliant, hopefully if people upgrade to that it will make life easier. I could be overly optimistic though as a lot of our corporate clients are still running IE 6


I know what you mean. IE doesn't support this web standard; doesn't support that. Things that will work in any OTHER current browser but thanks to MS, you have to come up with workarounds since there are hapless users out there with Exploder at the ready.

Fuckin' pain in the ass. Makes one really resent the powerful. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-10-10  02:21pm - 5370 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I use the latest version of Firefox, the browser that I was led to by people here at PU. (Used to use "Exploder," but that's been relegated to links from e-mails, thanks to fucking Outlook.)

But Firefox doesn't prance through the Forests of I-Porn like it used to. As others have said, it's sluggish and getting bloaty. It's a real snooze-buttoner on startup. I click that Firefox icon in my sys tray and immediately get a conditioned-response craving for some homemade java. Need something to do!

I'm glad we're talking about browsers again. It's good to keep current. Maybe I'll try Google Chrome, but does it handle downloads as well as DownloadItAll? That's one plug-in that I've grown to love. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-09-10  04:17am - 5371 days #17
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


I think this is a perfect example of what I was talking about in another thread about the inherent contradiction between webmasters & PU's here at PU.

No offence, Miss Hybrid, but the whole reason for the existence of this site - the very name of this site - is Porn Users being invited to have a forum to give complete and unexpergated reviews of porn sites - as an addendum to the professional reviewers of TBP.

Why don't we all go out and start porn sites? For most of us, I believe the answer comes down to "We don't want to."

Does that mean that we shouldn't give complete and unexpergated reviews of porn sites at a site that was created for us to do so? I really don't think so.

Besides the fact that this site was intended for that purpose, there's the relevant fact that we're the people that pay money to join porn sites in an environment that is up to it's neck in an attitude that anybody that pays for porn is a moron.

Look through the reviews and comments at this site and its pretty clear that while there are significant shots taken at various porn sites there is also a huge amount of appreciation expressed daily for sites that members here believe are doing things right - and while there's significant back-and-forth about that, the cream pretty clearly rises to the top.

At least that's my view.

If you want to make the case that this whole PU thing is a bunch of bollocks and that it ought to be replaced with WM.com, go ahead.


Here, here! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-08-10  06:08pm - 5371 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


In one way or another, I've been doing customer service related work for the last 12 years and I'm well aware that you can't please everyone. I've been cussed out to my face, blamed for things I had nothing to do with and even threatened with physical harm. None of that matters to me as long as I know I've represented my product well.


Yeah, I've had everything you mentioned has happened to me, too when I was doing a lot of work in stores. People can be such assholes! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-08-10  04:32pm - 5372 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


[black]Miss Hybrid's calling us "experts in porn" seems a bit sarcastic to me. That leads me to believe that there's some resentment when people pick a site apart without a thought to what all it takes to make one a success.

Ed2009's answer hits the nail on the head - we're consumers, and porn is just like any other product we buy. There are tons of product review sites out there, full of people speaking out on the shortcomings of things they've bought. Can you really blame someone if Product X doesn't measure up to our expectations and we say so?



And it happens with movies, books, TV serials, etc. It happens in the work that I do, too. People on the outside really do not understand and they have a lot of preconceptions, some of which are just ridiculous.

But they don't NEED to know. I like what I do, and I don't dwell on the realization that some people fail to appreciate it. It's fine with me. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-08-10  03:34pm - 5372 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


That would be hilarious. Maybe they'd find out why 90% of new adult sites go bust in the first 12 months.

I genuinely believe that the vast majority of adult site surfers have got no idea of the technical and legal complexities of running a site, the interface and layout issues, the compatibility problems, the cost and other factors with bandwidth and hosting, the way marketing and promotion changes over time (ie what worked two years ago doesn't work now), changes in technology (eg HD, streaming, 3D etc), organising shoots, organising equipment and organising models, and everything else that webmasters have to cope with and achieve.

We just have to be resigned to the fact that the majority of them are not interested in what goes on beside the scenes, they just want the best results for their money. It can be annoying and depressing but who can blame them?


I've thought enough about the complexities and difficulties of running a site that I sure wouldn't do it myself. I've made other choices for earning a livelihood that work better for me.

And the site owners and webmasters have made theirs, no? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-08-10  03:21pm - 5372 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I'm too busy trying to get the existing porn sites to do what they do better. I've had some success at this.

There's an adage: "Why reinvent the wheel?" I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-07-10  11:20pm - 5372 days #171
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Here's a unique approach to getting your nude stuff. Check out the search feature on the left. It's kinda fun! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-07-10  10:17pm - 5372 days #29
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


Trouble is, Drooler, that niche material is completely under represented and understandably so. What web owner / web master wants to have a site that caters to about 5 - 10% of Porn Users. No money in that and so, those of us who are not satisfied with content that appeals to the other 90% have a hard time finding exactly what we are looking for .. so we are practically forced to go for what, to us, is second best or "least objectionable" as you put it.

Niche One: sexy and appealing lingerie .. young people are not interested. Cotton thongs are fine with them.

Niche Two: Truly mature women (for those of us over fifty who think that someone in their fifties and sixties can still look darned good.) Again, most younger PUs shudder, they don't want to see Grannies.

Niche Three: Hair! Again, to most PUs hair has almost become a sign of hygienic neglect, almost uncleanness while only thirty years ago it was normal!

Now combine the three for my ideal site and you come up with Zilch! So, what can I substitute? Remember that old commercial: If you don't have Parkay you can always use butter! Except in my case it's been the other way around for far too long. I've had to murmur to myself: Well, if you can't have butter you can always use Parkay!


Oh, sure. What I like is uncommon enough that I've spent years churning my own butter, if you'll pardon the expression.

Too bad that I don't like bondage and such. I don't know if that niche goes over the 10% satisfaction rate for the general porn-using population, but maybe it does. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-07-10  01:44pm - 5373 days #20
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Is internet porn really so much like television, wherein the viewer's principle of choice is what's "least objectionable"? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-04-10  06:42pm - 5375 days #12
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I was just looking around for David Allan Coe. I didn't realize he'd written that great Johnny Paycheck hit, "Take This Job and Shove It."

Well now I know ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-04-10  06:20pm - 5375 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
It's funny how this question about photo size relative to the screen keeps coming up as an issue.

First, I don't mind scrolling. I like my pics BIG sometimes. Really big. Like, I've got a huge stock of 6000px shots from Hegre-Art.

But it's not just whether or not one must scroll. There is a wide variety of screen resolutions and screen sizes as well. And walls.

Also, there are sometimes pics in which the subject is too small in the shot. I get that sometimes at FemJoy. Damned if I'll ever get why they make the model the size of house cat in some photos, but they do. (It's like Land of the Giants, Nudist Edition.) Solution? 4000 pixels.

Anyway, if you don't want to get complaints about photo sizes, offer 1200 and 3000 pixels both. And if you don't understand why people like big photos that would have to scroll on your computer screen, well, so what? You don't need to understand it any more than I need to understand the appeal of smearing food on the breasts (in photos, real life being something quite different) or draping strings of beads in the crack, which I think is a pretty unsanitary thing to do with one's jewelry.

Or fisting.

Or fisting at 1024 pixels, for that matter. Too small! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 04, 2010, 06:32pm

04-03-10  04:36pm - 5377 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I'm hard to pressed to recall a convention of any kind I've been to that wasn't basically a parade of pricks, dragon bitches, douche-bags, and wanna-be weenies. Pick a field, any field. Think of the well-known people in it. Go meet them at a convention. Have lunch with them. Bump into them on a elevator, or by the catering table. It's not surprising that they've reached their status by being ruthless.

Not that they had to. I've met some people "famous" to me that were really nice folks. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-03-10  11:43am - 5377 days #48
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Monahan:


Excellent plan. I enjoy emoticons when used in moderation, but understand how they can be annoying as well.




Really? Do tell! Love the frisky cat, though. I'm still laughing. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-03-10  11:42am - 5377 days #47
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Rick:


Good point about them being distracting when writing since they are forced to the right of the message field. We'll work on something early next week so they can be hidden on that page.


I just hit the esc key before starting this message. That works well enough. But thanks, Rick, for taking it into consideration and of course to turboshaft for the esc key tip. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-02-10  04:07pm - 5378 days #39
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I'll probably get flack for saying this, but frankly, I don't much care for forums that are festooned with a bunch of little emoticon pictures, especially the multiple animated ones.

I'm not saying to never, ever use them, but I think they're often used to excess and the result is less readable text and a lot of poor taste.

The pictures that people are uploading are sometimes nice, especially the boobies, and I don't mean the avian variety.

Anyway, this is a plea for sanity. Please, don't overdo it with the ugly little yellow faces.

OK? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

951-1000 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 6 10 14 19 Page 20 21 24 27 30 36 37 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.33 seconds.