Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: turboshaft (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1958)  |   Threads Started (41)

751-800 of 1958 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 5 8 11 15 Page 16 17 22 27 32 39 40 Next Page >

06-12-11  02:01pm - 4942 days #4
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Some girls like to turn the lights down real low for sex, so ...


Maybe that means they don't want to see it all. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-11-11  11:32pm - 4943 days Original Post - #1
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08


...the recent Anthony Weiner scandal has got me thinking about something. (No, not whether I should start shaving my chest again!) What I'm curious about is, since we are all online and seem to prefer our dirty pictures and video in digital format, what do PU'ers think about sending a loved one, or just a most recent flirt, photos of one's cock-a-doodle?

I would really like to hear from the female members here, what few there are, because I have yet to hear a woman tell me, under any circumstances, "Don't forget to send my a photo of your cock." The demand just isn't there like it is for pussy portraits. I know it's a double standard, but I think most of us guys here love the equivalent girl shots, whether it's an enticing cameltoe photo or it's unsheathed equivalent. Hell, in my opinion certain parts of the female body are like a Georgia O'Keeffe painting come to life, but with even more artistic value!

So I say bring on the hot lady crotch shots! But really, who thinks that an equal number of women are clamoring for full-on shots of guy's equipment, much less in a poorly lit, cellphone-quality rendering? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-11-11  10:38pm - 4943 days #2
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
As far as the fantasy scene I would direct goes, I'll just keep it to myself. Don't want to slip in some idea so crazy and perverted that it will have me forever exiled to a remote island somewhere.

Though I would probably keep it POV (not necessarily always my POV... ) so I could be involved, and/or have the actresses rotate camera and sound duties--better than having some asshole crew member constantly telling me "A director isn't supposed to do that!" "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-11-11  10:26pm - 4943 days #19
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


I used the Canadian spelling.




Actually I was just making fun of your temporary apostrophe handicap, though apparently the apostrophe got checked at the border. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-11-11  10:21pm - 4943 days #18
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by otoh:


* Grand Theft Auto San Andreas - I like the others... but Vice City didn't have quite the personality and IV was a bit too serious. SA had the right level of humour, and lots of things to do.


GTA IV and the Saints Row games--blatant GTA knockoffs, BTW--are some of my favorite moral-free video games out there (uh, in addition to Fallout 3, see above).

They're are part of the reason I like video games. Like much of my porn, they offer a virtual, guilt-free experience of behavior that I wouldn't even think of doing in real life. I mean, really, who would be so cruel as to crash a car into an innocent prostitute? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-11-11  10:02pm - 4943 days #16
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by BadMrFrosty:


With regards to Fallout 3, there are quite a few different endings. None of them are happy, happy, joy, joy but some are a little upbeat at least. Also if you install the addon "Brotherhood of steel" the end of the main game is also very different.


Originally Posted by pat362:


I was surprised by the ending because the previous 2 games offered a more positive outlook. This is the first game I've ever played where the main character dies to save the world. It's very altruistic but not in no way necessary to the story. I want to play Fallout Las Vegas.


Fallout 3 is the only title of the Fallout series I have played and I had mixed reactions to it. Quite depressing for a video game really, I just never had much hope for the story progression or any of the characters. That and I seem to remember taking the most amoral route through the game possible.

I just hope my choices in that game are not indicative of anything in the future, as I willfully let a lot of other characters get killed, it seems just because I could. (C'mon, that A-bomb in the middle of a settlement wasn't going to detonate itself!) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-10-11  09:09pm - 4944 days #13
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


I believe that Aubrey got some facial surgery as well as implants. Her nose looks a little smaller than what I remember. She does look older than she should but that could be because porn tends to age girls faster.


Not necessarily, a lot of girls seem to age normally, or at least comparable to those who do no porn. I guess it depends on what she's doing--a lot of gaping, stretching is more wear and tear on the skin than solo stuff. That and outdoor scenes under lots of sunlight are not too good for the skin either. But genetics, diet, and overall health all play their part too, and the results can be anywhere from ageless to overripe. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-10-11  09:04pm - 4944 days #12
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Doh!!!


Uh, isn't that D'oh? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-09-11  12:28pm - 4945 days #13
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


If turboshaft lived on the island of Tanna, he could worship Prince Phillip as a god. I'm not sure if that means turboshaft couldn't practice other religions or politics.


Sorry, but I worship neither gods nor people (save for the occasional lady who has left me temporarily dropping to my knees... ), but thanks for the thought.

However, the weather on Tanna sounds pretty nice, and who knows, maybe I could get use to wearing a penis sheath, as the more traditional native males there supposedly still do. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-09-11  02:40am - 4945 days #169
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by slutty:


The MTV show portrayed it as a body image/self esteem thing, but come on if you're hot you're hot, no need to skrew around with it.


Yes, but Western society puts a ton of emphasis on the superiority of (whether natural or not) big breasts--hence, the popularity of breast enlargement surgery. If small breasts were considered the pinnacle of female beauty, then plastic surgeons would be liposucitoning breast tissue like it were cancerous.

Even worse, our culture slurs small breasts as "underdeveloped," "abnormal," or, the ultimate sin, "prepubescent" (pedophile!). Somehow, if a woman's breasts aren't big enough, then every man who dares to be attracted to the them or the woman to which they are attached is automatically a sex offender.

When are we going to grow up and realize some women are just naturally "small," while others are more bosomy, and most fall somewhere in between? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-09-11  02:23am - 4945 days #10
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


The amount of money generated by anything attached to Royal families is enormous. I can imagine how some of the French of today must feel for having executed what would be an gigantic cash cow of tourist money today. They just have to look at their British cousins to see just how much money the French Revolution has cost them over the years.


I bet the majority of French are thankful they don't live under a Medieval-style group of tyrants masquerading as some sort of VIP family that's in charge of the country. Plus, when the French gave the royals the boot (or the blade) they left the architecture intact, so there's plenty leftover with which to attract tourists.

Just my . "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-09-11  02:13am - 4945 days #9
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Denner:


People in Denmark and Sweden are divided in two - one part want to keep the monarchy as a tradition and a tourist/economic magnet - the other part want to get rid of it becuase "royal blood" is outdated and ridiciolous.


I guess I lean more towards the latter, because I see the real scandal as being a country as modern as Denmark still having a monarchy--even if only symbolic--in the year 2011. And frankly, I think, anybody who is still interested in the perpetuation of royalty, whether through weddings or puerile scandal, should have their head examined (though not cut off)!

There is nothing to romanticize in a post-Enlightenment era about a person and/or family who were simply born into their imaginary power. I don't advocate cutting anyone's head off--just their taxpayer-funded bank account.

---

Sorry, but talk of royalty always gets my liberty-oriented blood boiling. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-08-11  08:14pm - 4946 days #8
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I guess some things just will not go quietly into the night. Monarchy has that characteristic, it seems, big time. We even had "King George" here in the US for 8 wonderful years. Not formally a king, but he seemed to be taking on the trappings (mmm, wire-tappings, for instance?) of a closer-to-absolute ruler.

Somehow that issue, warrantless wiretapping, seems to have gone away with him.


No it hasn't: from PolitiFact.

I think Bush II is guiltier, at least on this issue, for introducing such unconstitutional nonsense, but the idea that Obama is some sort of radical liberal and would never do such things is ridiculous. It's why I scratch my head every time someone starts screeching about how Obama is some sort of ultra-left socialist. But the greater problem is when measures get introduced, such as this wiretapping bullshit, subsequent leaders seem to find them too enticing to risk outlawing them. I mean, fuck, there's a war on! This is no time to be bothering with the Bill of Rights!

Still, Bush II & Co. expanded the power of the White House to some pretty crazy extremes, particularly in regards to defining torture/"enhanced interrogation," and in use of the military in general. Hey, if you can't even win the popular vote, why give a shit about citizens in the first place? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

06-04-11  08:50am - 4950 days #479
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


The question is often asked - "Why make a US version of a movie that's already been made?"

[...]

More cinematic brilliance, more chills, more "Holy fucking shit" excitement in many few-second bits of this trailer than in the 3 European films, for my tastes. American film-makers know how to make things "pop". And David Fincher is one of the best film-makers working today.


Making a US version can also bring in big domestic box office. Admittedly Americans are fairly monolingual and this can be a huge barrier to seeing foreign films.

Interestingly, films are one America's last great exports (that and military equipment), and most big films now earn more overseas than they do here, even when they are dubbed into another language to fit the market. There is definitely a wow factor to Hollywood films, along with a healthy dose of escapism for our summer blockbusters.

Trailer makes it look like it's definitely a Fincher film, and even as a US remake, it was still shot in Sweden with numerous non-American actors. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jun 04, 2011, 08:53am

06-02-11  12:31am - 4952 days #12
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


It never occurred to me that it would be an expense to the Billers to exchange currencies.


Don't forget that many credit card companies will have their own fees for transactions made in other currencies, though I don't think I've ever encountered this paying for a porn site. Just something to be aware of if you're paying for something that's not in your own currency.

This is another one of those pay up-or-fuck-off fees that credit card companies have, or at least they do down here in the U.S., maybe Canada's a little nicer to their consumers? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-31-11  03:21am - 4954 days #16
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


CRT was built more for stationary use than for lugging. In spite of the "portable" 12-inch or smaller TV models from way back. Lol.


Sweating it out to get rid of that monitor made me think that since so many of the comparatively ultralight LCDs now have carrying handles that maybe the old CRTs were never intended to be moved...ever. It is oddly satisfying to smash an old tube TV or monitor but I was aiming to recycle it and therefore not break it into a thousand pieces (and I think they have lead in them, probably along with some other poisonous ingredients.)

The film and TV industry still use portable color-balanced CRTs for monitoring picture, supposedly as one of the last commercial users of such products. These are usually under 12" with rectangular metal cases and carrying handles since they are moved frequently. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jun 02, 2011, 12:33am

05-30-11  01:00am - 4955 days #14
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Sometimes there's a fine line between objective reporting and making your financiers happy. Or maybe it's just me. Maybe I have euphemistically "special" vision, but it can't be both that it's natural and that it takes getting used to, can it?

I do understand your reasons for liking how they make documents readable side by side. I've got a wider screen at work (strangely enough) and it can be good for that.


Well, have you ever thought that what you're are used to now may not actually be natural? (BTW, always answer "Hell no!" when this question is asked in regards to your favorite weird porn fetishes.)

When working at a desk I'd prefer a wider monitor over a taller monitor any day. But at least, I hope, we all agree on a preference for flat screens over the desk-stressing CRT monstrosities of yesteryear. I just recently got rid of one and it was like lugging around a lead block with a power cable hanging out the back.

Yes, it was 4:3, but no, it was not working. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-30-11  12:52am - 4955 days #13
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Denner:


The info was that almost no one makes them anymore - only special screens for call centers and office use. The biggest I could get - in Europe - was a 21,3" - and extremely expensive..this link is in Danish..BUT the price - it's somewhat over $ 1200 - crazy - when you can get an ok and big wide screen for $ 2-300.


Ouch! That sucks, because all the non-WS monitors I saw online were as cheap as current WS (all 19" or less though). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-27-11  04:50pm - 4958 days #4
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
I was looking on a few computer store sites and to my surprise they do sell a few non-widescreen monitors. They seem to max out at around 19", which would be kinda small for a widescreen, but I guess it's decent for non-WS. Interestingly many look to be a 5:4 aspect ratio, which makes them slightly closer to a square than 4:3 monitors.

I'm a widescreen lover--great for lying-down landscapes and girl-girl toy sharing! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-26-11  02:06am - 4959 days #16
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


This gives me great hope. To know that there are so many loving people among the rich and famous and powerful warms the cockles of my heart!


Like ex-Governator Arnold Schwarzenegger? But maybe it was all the steroids he used to take and they made his heart big too, or at least kept his libido strong.

Or is that Viagra I'm thinking of? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-25-11  06:19pm - 4960 days #14
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by graymane:


Further..... (are you ready for this?)

Mr Ahmadinejad now says that the infidel European countries are using special equipment to force clouds to 'dump' Iran's water on their own continent...thus creating Iranian droughts to enrich themselves.
"they prevent rain clouds from reaching regional countries", he says.


That sounds like cloud seeding.

Supposedly China used it to clear up the skies for the 2008 Summer Olympics, though I don't think you could use it to "prevent rain clouds from reaching regional countries". "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-25-11  06:12pm - 4960 days #13
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


Yes, and those who stood staunchly for family values were caught cheating on their wives. Pathetic hypocrites!


Or they just care so much about families that they had to start a second one. I guess some people just have a lot of love to give. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-25-11  06:10pm - 4960 days #12
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Khan:


One thing for sure, they all hate porn.


Or just women in general, particularly free and uninhibited women. Of course all Muslim women who wear religious clothing are doing so by "choice" so it's not repressive.

Another reason I love porn; it serves as big middle finger to the supposed anti-sex religious fascists--whatever books or beliefs they claim to follow--who want to force us all into a Medieval theocratic police state for the 21st century. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-25-11  05:52pm - 4960 days #18
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


But what about these farting sites? Schedule is set, lights, cameras, sound and set are ready to go. Then the girl arrives and she doesn't have gas. No one can fart on command! Not even me! (Though my wife would say otherwise.) In the old days there were fluffers for the gents. I can't imagine that there is a kind of fluffer for farting ladies. If so, that might make for an interesting segment on Dirty Jobs.


I assume there is some device out there that's basically a reverse pussy pump where you stick the hose in the target orifice and pump away. Fancier models probably have a pressure gauge so you can brag to your friends about being able to take a higher PSI than them...

And don't some vacuum cleaners have a blower switch? Since people are already using them to masturbate/pussy pump with, it only seems natural they would inflate themselves as well. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-25-11  05:45pm - 4960 days #17
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Again, I'm not being judgmental when I wonder why something so non-sexual can be sexualized.


That's the whole idea of a fetish--sexualize something that isn't ("shouldn't" in some people's minds) sexualized.

Personally, the farther away you get from the genitals the harder it is for me to see the pleasure. The ass and thighs? Sure. The feet? I don't see the appeal, but apparently a lot of people do. Or, say, getting turned on by a woman's underwear (seems logical), as compared to a woman wearing glasses (whatever floats your boat).

Of course if this was a car forum we'd probably all be, uh, "excited" to hear a powerful car start it's engine, so maybe farting isn't so crazy. (I've read responses by people describing car engine sounds, and many express very sexual thoughts.) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on May 26, 2011, 11:47pm

05-13-11  03:42pm - 4972 days #21
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Crap, who would have thought! Bin Laden did have a porn stash ... guess he really wasn't into the whole idea of an after life of virgins. (here)




Gee, who would've thunk it? I guess we all have secrets...even the most reprehensible of us.

Granted, he never said that he ordered attacks on Americans and their allies because of their insatiable badandy400-scale appetite for porn--"They hate us for our freedom" was always bullshit. Plus he was on his fifth wife, and was one of 54 children, with another 21 mothers-in-law! Clearly sex wasn't forbidden in the family.

I always found him to a hypocrite for his traditionalist views. He was basically a spoiled rich kid...who hated capitalism; living only a simple life...while relying on and enjoying modern technology and expensive material goods. Considering the way he turned out, he makes Paris Hilton seem like an angelic trust fund kid.

---

P.S. I'm not sure if those pictures and videos should be released! What could be worse for a young porn star than to know she was bin Laden's spank material?

And we thought being a Charlie Sheen "goddess" was bad! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on May 13, 2011, 03:46pm

05-13-11  01:15am - 4972 days #17
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


I think it more likely that an attack on porn would come from the feminist extreme left who believe that women are being objectified through porn.

There are some in the feminist camp who recognize that porn actresses wield the power in most cases and that porn can be an enabler for them.

Sadly, however, there are also cases of exploitation of young women by unscrupulous men, and this is where the rest of the feminists would jump on the anti-porn bandwagon if the subject of banning it would come up again.


The problem with feminists attacking porn because they feel women are being exploited is that they are attacking a symptom and not the problem (assuming there is a real problem here). As I discussed in my reply to rearadmiral's recent thread on why women get into porn, easy money and lack of opportunity draw them in, so simply outlawing porn would not be doing them any favors, and would in fact be making it worse by eliminating one more job that requires basically no education or experience.

I'm not condoning exploiting young, naive, and inexperienced women who are in porn but if feminists really wanted to do something they would support full legalization with regulation instead of total elimination. Zero tolerance is zero thinking. But of course if this conflicts with their worldview then they would probably tell me to go to hell--and it wouldn't be the first time!

Sadly I believe the Religious Right would be the ones reigning in porn, and this isn't just because of my own prejudices. Looking at the erosion of Roe v. Wade in recent years proves they have the ability to enact or at least strengthen laws that further their theocratic goals for America. Abortion may seem far off from porn but they are both battles in the so-called "culture wars" that give a boner to the far right, who are unfortunately taking over the Republican Party. Despite the economic problems I'm betting bullshit cultural issues will still be dragged out for the upcoming presidential election.

I'm not putting down genuine conservatives here, because in the U.S. they have been marginalized by this strange, creepy, but very powerful minority of anti-intellectuals who have an odd view of what exactly "liberty" entails (and free speech isn't part of it). The end result is forcing candidates to bend over backwards to prove their faith and the dredging up of nonissues that become less and less important as the country progresses socially (and younger voters replace past generations). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-13-11  12:43am - 4972 days #16
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Good God, I hope this is just another urban myth. Stuff like this make my interests seem tame.


Then don't you hope it's true? Then you won't have anything to feel guilty about concerning your porn habit--that's gotta help with the spouse. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-13-11  12:35am - 4972 days #13
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


The fact is that many other girls from similar family situations choose to be cashier and what not. The major difference between them is money. Where else can a girl with a basic education and almost no work experience make 300$ to 1200$ for a couple hours work?


Uh, what about a stripper at a high end "gentleman's club" or an Emperor's Club VIP-style escort?

Former New York governor Eliot Spitzer supposedly paid Ashley Dupré $4,300 for a day, which included travel and hotel booking, but Emperor's listed hourly rates up to $3,100 and day rates up to $22,000! (Both of those were for "seven diamonds" services, whatever the hell that means.) I don't know how a girl gets work like that, but you'd think she would have some skill beyond escorting if she's charging that much. Maybe resumes are involved at that level of adult entertainment?

Yet I still find strippers and prostitutes sleazier than porn stars (and there seem to be more laws involved too), probably because porn stars seem to do the most for the money. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-13-11  12:18am - 4972 days #12
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


So why do some 18-20 year-olds go into porn and some work as cashiers? Sure, some girls look born for porn with the tattoos and piercings (you know the look � they�re like deep-fried food. You KNOW they�ll be bad for you but you can�t resist) but many don�t. Why did someone like Aubrey Addams go into porn and not meteorology? Adventure? Money? Danger? I�m drawing a blank here. What stops my cashier friend from following her dream to be gangbanged in a porn flick?


This reminds of something I heard in a doc about porn a few years back (sorry, don't remember the title)--something along the lines of "It's not like we all had a choice between doing this and an acceptance letter to Harvard."

It's important to remember when people talk about "choices"--whether they are supposedly right or wrong--they are not the same for everyone. It irritates me to no end that people just simply think Well, why doesn't he/she just do that? All their problems would be solved! Because the world doesn't work that way, and this applies to a lot of things outside of getting into porn.

Just as an example, take Pres. Obama and his path to becoming the first black president. A lot of people in the media go "He's a good role model to young black men in America," which frequently ends up being a subtle way of saying that where people wind up is simply because they didn't make the "right" choices. But the vast, vast majority of people don't have Harvard's law school in their future, or even college, and it's not simply because they just don't study hard enough, or on the other end, like people have said about porn, because they are being abused by one or both parents.

I'm rambling here (as usual ) but I too sometimes genuinely wonder why a certain girl isn't just doing porn, and it's usually when I'm watching a beer ad since they almost always have porn-ready actresses in them.

I don't see it mainly as the end result of child abuse, but love of quick, easy (relatively speaking...) money. Like Graymane mentioned, money talks and bullshit walks, including the abused bullshitters. Some actually need the money for non-abusive reasons--Aurora Snow comes to mind here--and they are not so shy as to be scared away by fucking or at least masturbating on camera.

So, many have a, uh, healthy appetite for sex + money, but I don't believe it's because daddy played doctor with them when they were in grade school or they are suffering from some imbalance in the brain and a quick trip to the pharmacist will "cure" them. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on May 13, 2011, 12:39am

05-06-11  08:35pm - 4979 days #16
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I swear, she could shave her head and I'd still be crazy about her.


I think I've said this about a few women before, but mostly outside of porn. :Sigourney Weaver (Alien 3), Natalie Portman (V for Vendetta), Demi Moore (GI Jane). Hmm, arming them probably makes them pretty sexy too...

And of course on top of the sexy-and-shaved list porn empress Belladonna, though I think she's hot regardless of her hair--nasty temptress! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-06-11  08:17pm - 4979 days #466
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


The Green Hornet had a US release date of January, 2011. That movie starred Seth Rogen and Cameron Diaz. The DVD release date for that movie was May 3, 2011 (this week).

Green Lantern is a different movie, not yet released, starring Ryan Reynolds.

With so many comic book movies coming out, it's hard to keep them straight.

Originally Posted by pat362:


I just saw the new Thor movie and I really liked it.[...]The best thing about the movie is that you don't need to be a fan of the comic book to appreciate it.


Gee, maybe we should have a whole (non-adult) comic book thread? Hollywood is sure making some serious bank off comic books these last few years. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-04-11  11:01am - 4981 days #11
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


Some models are able to pull off a different hair colour while on others it's a mess. I'm usually partial to the real hair colour because it will match the bush(that's if I'm lucky and she has one).


See, it's not so bad when the bush is banished, is it? Just another advantage to the fully shaved/waxed/lased lady parts, along with the smoother-than-smooth touch, amazing looks, and one less place to gather crumbs.

And like you said, if you have a bare floor, it doesn't matter what color the drapes are! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-04-11  10:22am - 4981 days #18
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


No, they happen to be male virgins and he'll be playing catcher for them.


You'd think most of these fundamentalist Muslims are virgins anyway. I mean what else would piss someone off enough to strap on a suicide vest to further his cause? I'm betting more sex and more porn would relieve a lot of the stress that drives these death bound people to the brink of insanity--or at least it'd keep them preoccupied for awhile.
--> --> "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-03-11  06:59pm - 4982 days #7
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Micha:


When I first got a computer, the second thing I did was look at naked girls on this new internet thing. With a 7k modem, it was not worth the wait. Fifteen years later I set up a computer for a friend and the second thing he did was look at naked girls. Within a week he was an expert.


Kinda reminds of a Family guy episode where the sexaholic Quagmire discovers Internet porn for the first time (circa 2010).

I can only imagine I'd have had a similar reaction had I discovered porn at 2010 standards rather than watching it progressively change and grow from the dark days of dial-up in the 1990s to the jaw-dropping HD fetish superhighway it has turned into today. I also admit that one of the first things I do when setting up a computer is "test" the Internet connection...usually two or three times just to be sure. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-03-11  11:35am - 4982 days #12
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Or is he sunning himself on some luxury liner care of the CIA for ratting on his mates, or being tortured in some cell somewhere for information. No body? All very suspicious.


I think I smell a sequel to Weekend at Bernie's II! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-02-11  02:43pm - 4983 days #9
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


Here's a possible reason why the US invaded Iraq. After 9/11 it was important for the Bush administration to appear strong in the face of it's enemy. The first and biggest problem was that the US didn't have too many countries that could be considered enemies. There may be many groups and indivduals that don't like or hate Americans but you can't really attack people. You need a Country so that left you with the two "I" Iran and Iraq. I think they picked Iraq because of the history between Saddam and the Bush family. Bush senior was president during the Kuweait war and I guess it was left to his son to finish what Daddy had started.


I certainly don't think that was ever the official reason...


Originally Posted by pat362:


Another greta thing is that the Navy seals were able to retrieve a number of computrer hard drive. That's the one thing that might have serious repercussion throught out the world. Can you imagine what might be on those drives?


I hope it's a little more valuable than what you might find on any of our hard drives--this is probably the stuff that keeps badandy400 up at night.



I guess I'm the perpetual wet blanket contrarian when it comes to these things, but this time for a couple of serious, mostly unselfish reasons;

1.) This might give momentary joy to those who don't have a close personal connection to 9/11 (like myself) but hearing some victims' families speak out, many don't sound like they are overly moved.

And if this closure argument is extended to military families and friends who have lost loved ones it sounds even weaker, and almost insulting. I'm a little biased here, as I spent a year in Iraq when I was in the military, and bin Laden wasn't on anyone's mind. Ever. In fact more Americans have died just in Iraq alone than in the 9/11 attacks. This isn't much in the way of vindication.

2.) This final bin Laden operation almost makes any argument for the Iraq war, and even most of the Afghanistan war, worse because it was accomplished on such a small scale, made possible by intelligence operations, not massive military campaigns with 100s of thousands of troops.

Supposedly Obama nixed a large bombing operation because it would have made body ID'ing harder and caused a lot more civilian casualties--which was one of my predictions last December (the other being bin Laden would die of old age). Since I was wrong about killing bin Laden with a bomb maybe it means that I'll be wrong in this reply too...or it means Pres. Obama reads this forum!

I really hope people start to seriously question what the hell are we still doing overseas after things like this, and what will be doing for the foreseeable future. How many presidents are going to pass on these hand-me-down wars? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on May 02, 2011, 02:51pm

05-02-11  09:52am - 4983 days #5
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Denner:


In most off these conflicts in the interest of the western world it's always the USA who bears the heavy load. Not fair.


Well, not to brag, but we do have the biggest military of the West and the biggest military budget of the entire planet, by a lot. If you guys have the money and manpower to go and invade a country just for the hell of it, be our guest. I still haven't figured out why we invaded Iraq back in 2003.

Interestingly this bin Laden operation most likely could have been pulled off by any number of small European countries with special forces, sort of promoting quality over quantity when it comes to high value targets. So don't feel too left out Denner.

---

And I don't mean to be too much of a downer but can anyone really explain what offing bin Laden actually accomplishes beyond the symbolic? I think a lot people simply had forgotten about him, not to mention how decentralized al Qaeda is, so that "decapitating" it of its leadership is largely meaningless. People were celebrating here in the U.S. in the streets last night (many of them admitting to being grade schoolers when 9/11 occurred) but this is definitely not VE Day or VJ Day...until I fool a girl into kissing me in the middle of the street. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-02-11  12:52am - 4983 days #11
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by graymane:


I�m sure many of you have been fooled -- as was I -- with this skillful deception..
Any thoughts ?


Can't say I've ever been fooled, gray, whether in person--which certainly seems a tad more important--or via a porn vid.

Still sounds odd if this was from a porn site since nobody really tries to fool you into a genre, that's just bad business. And digital porn isn't exactly excess merchandise that's just taking up space on the warehouse floor--"Damnit! We've got way too much tranny porn lying around here, claim it's boy-girl and that should free up some space."

Also just the simple logistics of fitting male weaponry into underwear that's designed for more dainty female goods is usually more than enough to raise a red flag. Did you see the chest first and think "she" just had mosquito bite A cups? Didn't the panties look a little, uh, over-stuffed?

I know some here are not too cameltoe crazy but at least it's good initial form of ID before you've gone too far! (Which is why I don't trust granny panties.) Just be glad it wasn't really a girl but then halfway through the couple stops and brings in a dog for a three-way... "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-02-11  12:35am - 4983 days #3
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Yes.

Here's the White House's official YouTube video of Obama's speech announcing it.

Hope that's proof enough for people...until birthers start asking for a long form death certificate, and then photos, and then blood samples.

I just hope this doesn't bring about a new wave of revenge attacks as bin Laden is surely a huge martyr to many around the world. Now the question is what to do about Afghanistan? The whole Global War On Terror? We Americans don't like complex answers and this certainly seems like a simple victory. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on May 02, 2011, 12:55am

05-01-11  01:59pm - 4984 days #36
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


Well, I tell you graymane it came as a complete shock to me to find that the most civilized forum on the Internet should be in a Porn Users' site! And I subscribed to a ton of newsgroups in the usenet, and participated in them before I gave up on it!


Maybe if people have enough porn they don't have so much to be angry about after all?

Just reading comments sections on other sites--without even going into their discussion forums--can be depressing, and really make you lose hope in our species. The intolerance, bigotry, and vitriol are nearly insufferable. It's the double-edged sword of the Internet--easy access to a wide range of viewpoints but even easier access to a extremely narrow world view. (Of course we're mostly a bunch of male perverts here. ) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-29-11  04:59pm - 4986 days #2
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


messmer with too much time on his hands.


Well, you know what they say about idle hands...

I'm betting the male nipples are not a big thing because there's another part of the male anatomy that's much, much more sensitive and gets a lot more attention, not to mention simply has a lot more capability. And male nipples are almost afterthoughts anyway. Possible only a few extremely conservative religious sects consider them off limits to wandering eyes.

Whereas female nipples are shielded, shrouded, and generally hidden from view so much that when we do see them we just go crazy! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-27-11  10:12am - 4988 days #28
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by graymane:


Thanks Chief. Always a monumental treat being on the receiving end of your pearls of wisdom.
Having said that, might I remind you again that the office of our goverment desperately needs good men of your extraordinary knowledge and talent seated in Washington.
Run-run-run.


I think I remember reading somewhere about how Khan already mentioned working for the government at some point in his past and it didn't have the most positive effect on him. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-27-11  10:06am - 4988 days #19
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


As much as I have enjoyed some of Sasha's porn movies. I've always found something a little strange about her performances. I'm not sure what it is so it's hard to explain. There was something about her eyes that I found off putting.


I agree her eyes are a little weird, maybe she was just always thinking about her future instead of in the plow-me-in-the-ass present she was living in so much of her work. I certainly don't think it was drugs or lack of enthusiasm. In fact she is probably one of the prime examples of a ready and willing performer in porn, something that supposedly drives the anti-porn feminists crazy (I guess because it destroys their world view?).

Originally Posted by pat362:


I'm truly curious to know what kind of performer Sasha could have been if she'd started doing porn at age 23?


Hmm, I don't know, isn't that technically over the hill in porn years? It doesn't seem a wise career move to go from mainstream to porn, unless you're a washed up child star looking to destroy your fans' innocent memories. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-27-11  09:48am - 4988 days #21
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by badandy400:


I thank you for the compliments. Gas costs too much for truckloads now days. Train cars seem to be most economical now.


So does this mean porn isn't green? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-27-11  09:46am - 4988 days #3
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Capn:


Why would it need to be burned to a disc?


Because that's what ISO files are for--disc burning, not watching.

I guess the appeal is because, as FuckingGambler says, "Blu-rays have many advantages over simple clips, including higher quality and much richer features." I would think most members would just want simple clips, I certainly would be happy with that. In my view good content can be its own richer feature. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-25-11  07:16pm - 4990 days #12
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Drooler:


There's a certain spark that you get with the 18 to 25 year old girls. And sometimes with older girls, too.


I agree here. There's a kind of twinkle in their eyes that seems to be a mix of enthusiasm and impulsiveness that is so easily lost with age and, yes, maturity as well.

Before they "grow up" and become cynical and practical--usually in the form of that dreadful phrase "settling down"--young porn actresses can make some really hot work.

Take Sasha Grey, who's 23 and has already moved on with some "real" acting work and has even published a book of her photography from porn sets. Ugh. I guess it's better than winding up in a morgue but I'd rather be watching porn stars, not authors. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-25-11  07:01pm - 4990 days #11
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
BTW, here's a link to Messmer's ALSScan review. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-25-11  06:58pm - 4990 days #10
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


I was reading messmer�s review of ALS Scan and he mentioned that a negative of the site for him was that there were no �mature� women. I suspect that he meant �mature� as in age, and not �mature� in that �these women don�t appear to be saving enough funds to sustain them in their senior years.� Or �Oooo� it�s clearly after Labor Day and she�s still wearing white!�


I hate it when they wear white after Labor Day--biggest turnoff! (To be honest though, white underwear always makes me think the girl is somehow more innocent than the ones with the colored underwear...and then they thoroughly prove me wrong.)

I think we all assume "mature" means older, not whether she can refrain from spending her latest paycheck on blow or clothing. Also, to be fair to Messmer, he didn't put ALS's low age range as a con but instead mentioned it in the Bottom Line as his "usual plaint" (which made me laugh because I was well aware of how young their models were).

Interestingly though when I read his review that part made me think back to when I first became a fan of ALSScan, which was in the '90s and their youngest models were older than me. And now I'm probably older than almost all their models, save for a tiny handful, and that makes me feel old! Maybe I should try and get a job there and I'll be too busy to care. Or should I start working out and get a job as an actor where all the female stars stay roughly in the same age range? So many choices.
Anyway, to actually answer the original question, I think my age interests have stayed the same, and not just because of my loyalty to ALSScan and their narrow age range (though that doesn't hurt) but because frankly I don't think the majority of women look good when they get significantly older. Okay, before anyone gets too angry, some women can look great through their 30s and even 40s, without even being proper MILFs, but a lot don't, especially if they are veteran stars and they (over)treat their bodies as such.

And it gets worse when this is combined with with how a lot of women around my age start to have children, which I don't at all find attractive, even if it can be considered the crowning achievement of womanhood. Sorry, women are naturally beautiful without kids, they don't need to prove it with reproduction.

Man, I sound like one shallow pig here...I'm not really this picky! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Apr 25, 2011, 07:03pm

04-20-11  08:45pm - 4995 days #17
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


The biggest hypocrisy I see with all the conservative mumbo jumbo on this issue is that many of them profess libertarian principles (less government, period) but at the same time they want government to crack on anything socially "bad". Also, at the same time we're drowning in debt, why spend good money chasing porn makers, internet gamblers (the newest federal bust) and steroid abusing sports stars (Lance Armstrong, etc.). Shit, just tax the stuff like everything else, that's the libertarian way. The real criminals are the companies hiding huge amounts of money off shore and politicians not willing to do anything but pay lip service to addressing our debt problems.


Ahh, there's the classic Wittguyian crankiness I love.

I think I have said this before in the forum, but the label "libertarian" seems to have been taken over by conservatives, if only because "conservative" became somewhat of a dirty word during the waning Bush II years (though many conservatives seemed to have problems with him and his policies much earlier).

The libertarianism I hear so much about recently seems to be almost exclusively a sort of fiscal libertarianism--mostly free markets, free trade, little to no taxes, and generally less government and/or government intervention overall. Even if you don't care about the social aspects that libertarianism could cover--drugs, sex, porn (that's the perfect trifecta for a fun weekend), speech, religion, rights of the accused, the list goes on--then you can still probably get away with labeling yourself as libertarian.

That's my big problem right there: this pick and choose nonsense that totally devalues the meaning of a political philosophy or just a belief. Granted, labels can become pretty meaningless because of so much misuse and misappropriation but it is insane to here someone scream about too much government when it comes to things like taxes or food regulation and then hear them scream that there's not enough when it comes to the so-called degradation of American culture, like porn.

Maybe Ben Franklin should have said "but in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes. Oh, and porn, that's totally certain too."

Anyway, I don't think the gun lovers are going to lose out on their guns anytime soon, or the porn lovers their porn, or the investors their free markets, but we're still all going to be paying taxes until we die, or at least until we are frozen so we can then be thawed out for Futurama-style head jars. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

751-800 of 1958 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 5 8 11 15 Page 16 17 22 27 32 39 40 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.05 seconds.