|
|||||
|
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
turboshaft (0)
|
851-900 of 1958 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 17 | Page 18 | 19 | 23 | 27 | 31 | 39 | 40 | Next Page > |
01-14-11 04:40pm - 5109 days | #16 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I've noticed this with hi-res photos too, especially closeups without a lot of Photoshopping, strays hairs become very apparent and pretty annoying and distracting. And it's not just Eastern Euro girls--ladies from all over seem to sport lone wolf hairs growing defiantly around otherwise bare assholes or staking claim on innocent taints. I say this has to stop! They need to come up with some sort of full body wax or laser chamber setup to zap all those offending hairs away. Just so long as they don't cross the line between "super sensual smoothness" and "oops, we need a fire extinguisher/somebody call an ambulance," then HD will really be worth all the money! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-14-11 04:20pm - 5109 days | #6 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I hope there's no more Stagliano-like legal proceedings in our future. I know it was more the result of a Bush II-era situation but this country needs to stop obsessing over dirty movies made by consenting adults--it's really juvenile and a waste of time and resources, which is truly obscene! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-14-11 04:14pm - 5109 days | #11 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I think she's just another power-hungry politician. Failing any future electoral victories she'll probably just continue to do anything that pads her bank account. She comes off as an arrogant bimbo and it is very easy to make fun of her (I know I've made my fair share of jokes) but she's probably laughing all the way to the bank. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-14-11 04:00am - 5110 days | #13 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Actually I didn't make myself too clear here either (though I'm not 900 years off...) but I meant that the increase in HD and Blu-Ray would hopefully push the implant and plastic surgery mayhem that's all the rage now off to the sides, so natural will become the new norm again. Or they will just use more makeup as I said above, or just say "Fuck it, who cares?" and keep loading up the ladies with saline. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-14-11 03:41am - 5110 days | #12 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
D'oh! I knew I had written something that I would have to go back and correct--and I think I originally just wrote it as the '20s! I guess I wanted to make everyone sure I was talking specifically about the eleventh century! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-13-11 10:08pm - 5110 days | #5 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
In my opinion this raises the "creepy factor," and not in the good oh-look-at-that way. No, that's the sort of dedication and stick-to-itiveness that I find just sad. Sort of like when someone tells me that haven't masturbated in a long time--"Uh nice, now get that hair trigger away from me." Of course I'm the sort of person who thinks discipline and abstinence are overrated, so what do I know? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-13-11 09:51pm - 5110 days | #9 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Do you mean in porn or mainstream film? "Talkies" came into Hollywood in the late 1920s* and early '30s and indeed many actors and actresses didn't make the transition (though they still seem to hire on looks alone, whereas acting ability takes second or third priority). I somehow doubt "normal skin imperfection" will make many pariahs, though makeup artists will probably being loading up on the foundation even more, I just hope not to freakish levels--a lot of actresses are now dolled up to horror clown-like proportions, if you ask me. Considering all the surgery, tattoos, and less-than-gentle lifestyle that so much of talent have you would be left with a handful of people with good skin. Or maybe you're right and things like the post-op plastic surgery look with it's unnatural bulges and scary scarring will become a weird, marginalized fetish. Bring on the HD! * Edit: I originally wrote about talkies coming into Hollywood in the 1020s, not the 1920s! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jan 14, 2011, 03:44am | |
|
01-13-11 09:35pm - 5110 days | #8 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I'm assuming this is because those files came from sites where they never seriously intended to have subscribers watching them on big screen TVs. Max desktop monitors would still probably be at least 10" smaller than your TV. And if those files are SD videos then they definitely not meant for the little big screen. I'm sure it helps hides all the zits, scars, and bruises though! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-13-11 09:29pm - 5110 days | #3 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
What happened in 2010? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-13-11 09:27pm - 5110 days | #11 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I'm betting that's the hardest part--don't the majority of new sites fold within a year? I guess if you retire rich from another industry (probably tech or web related) and have a few million dollars to just piss away then getting started could be somewhat easier. I've heard to stay in the industry requires passion--and I'm not talking --rather than any guarantee of a big paycheck. Still it's gotta beat some other jobs and if it makes people think they're missing out, even better! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-06-11 07:30pm - 5117 days | #7 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Yeah, isn't that what the free 'tube and torrent sites are for? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-06-11 07:28pm - 5117 days | #6 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
No kidding, but we'll always have these assholes around as long as we have and use the computers for them to fuck up in the first place. They're really just anarchists who want to cause trouble, but instead of dressing in black hoodies and going to protest the latest meeting of global-whatever they're sitting at home in front of a computer screen in a poorly lit room munching on junk food and cackling manically over their latest hacking ruse. (Which is completely different from how I collect porn! ) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-02-11 09:50pm - 5121 days | #10 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
This really isn't that porn-related, at least not since 'net porn made Playboy seem about as dirty as a Victoria's Secret catalog, but no one has mentioned Hugh Hefner's recent engagement to (one of?) his girlfriend who's a healthy 60 years younger. Unless she can wrangle a prenup out of him I don't see the attraction, though I'm sure it's still fun for him, if only to have a hottie feed you Viagra, pat you on the head, and then tuck you into bed each night. I'm not sure when they're making it official but it's anyone's guess as to how long it could last. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-02-11 09:26pm - 5121 days | #9 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Yeah, but he's a porn star not an attorney or politician, and I get way more creeps from looking at some empty suit than a goofy (if overweight and hairy) porn star who just enjoys what he's doing. If he were to lose weight and "fashion himself to look clean-cut" he wouldn't be Ron Jeremy, now would he? I wouldn't want to look like him at any age, but I wouldn't mind living his kind of life, and I'm betting many us of would consider ourselves lucky to have his job when we're his age! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
01-02-11 09:14pm - 5121 days | #8 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Uhh...wouldn't that be a blacklist of sorts? I don't like it when members disable their accounts, whether they are regulars or not, but I'm uncomfortable with a list being drawn up of members' account statuses--this isn't Facebook!. And if they had a problem with PU and aren't just taking a vacation (or a forearm-fatiguing video marathon...) then a list is probably not what they want. "Hey, come on back, ol' buddy, and we'll take you off the list!" "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-28-10 11:00pm - 5126 days | #7 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Only if she forgoes the irradiation scanner treatment, because I'm betting the scanners are designed to concentrate on the genitalia and ass (probably a focal point on the monitor). Who knows what dastardly devices female travelers have stuffed up there?! Better be extra sure and hit them with another dose of gamma radiation, and then put them through the finger bang/pat down because they might be wearing some sort of lead tube to foil the machines and hide their sex toy vagina balls (someone's probably already making this into a new fetish site... ). The TSA has done plenty of stupid things regarding security and privacy, I'm sure they've already crossed the line with these scanners and pat downs. If you're really concerned there's a company who sells privacy protecting underwear (I wish I was joking) for your adventures at the airport, sort of like chastity belts for the atomic age. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-28-10 10:35pm - 5126 days | #6 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Is it because the candy doesn't match the holiday? Never understood the obsession over drugs in the post-9/11 security freak-out--people aren't hiding drugs or getting wasted so they can take over a plane. If anything there's probably at least a few security "experts" who want nothing more than to sedate every load of airplane passengers and then wake them up at their destinations! Seriously, who's going to be a "security risk" when they've all been drugged into a Rip Van Winkle trance for the duration of their flight? It would certainly make those painful seats in coach less of an issue! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-28-10 10:23pm - 5126 days | #17 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Culture is one thing, the legal system is another. Would it really be inappropriate to their culture if they modified their laws? Much of world may accuse the U.S., or at least its leadership, as being overly prudish and repressed when it comes to sex and porn, but I would say it's out laws, not our culture--the truckloads of money that Americans spend on porn would say it's a proud part or our culture! (Or we're so repressed that we buy a lot of porn instead of expressing it in more social ways...) That last remark, about Kleenexes and putting them in your pocket sounds like my kind of no-no--is it from Japanese culture too? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-27-10 12:08pm - 5127 days | #51 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I agree because I have heard and read many times that if someone pisses off someone powerful enough in Hollywood then the whole town knows about it almost instantly. Granted very powerful actors have more leeway in being douchebaggery and dickheadness but that may just be the absolute power corrupts absolutely thing. Bottom line is it helps to make with the nice-nice and not be a dick to your employers. And given that she does not (yet...?) have a reputation for being an indispensable talent beyond a pretty face then it would probably help if she had a better attitude. I hate Michael Bay as much as the next person but he makes an enormous amount of money for the studio and that means a lot more than a twenty-something girl's whiny opinions. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-23-10 12:02pm - 5131 days | #14 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I think showing the asshole is a loophole in the law (insert your jokes her PU'ers ) because they are banned from showing genitals but not the backdoor, though they are probably banned from showing it being penetrated. I'm not a lawyer, just my . "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-23-10 11:40am - 5131 days | #51 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I think so far just Messmer and Cybertoad have disabled their accounts, and only Messmer in relation to the 2010 Awards thread (at least that's that seems to be everyone's assumption). Cybertoad has just been pretty inactive over the last few months--pretty much the whole year, in fact--so he might just be taking a holiday or something. I hope both of them will be back in the new year (sooner rather than later) or within the next few days, because they are missed. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-22-10 10:57pm - 5132 days | #15 | ||
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Maybe I wasn't too clear but I was referring to the topless barbershop pat362 mentioned:
As far as nude news anchors are concerned I wouldn't be surprised if half of Billy's flock are closeted fans. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | ||
|
12-22-10 03:37pm - 5132 days | #4 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Okay...but why'd you disable your account then? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-22-10 10:50am - 5132 days | #28 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
You run for the hills and I'll take your place. I say it's just another way to share your love with that special girl, though most are pretty intimidated-to-freaking-the-fuck-out when you come at them with a fist. I wonder why... "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-22-10 10:44am - 5132 days | #3 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
You should read up on PU'er badandy400--you don't begin to understand "massive" until you read up on the size of his collection, and number of hard drives (here's his setup from early 2008, just to give you an idea). Or just read his interview from 2009, he's done a lotta collecting! Toadsith didn't call his collection "the one man Library of Congress for porn" for nothing. Still, it's always impressive (or disturbing) to surpass the TB mark. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-22-10 10:20am - 5132 days | #43 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
If so we may have to redefine the term "cockblock" if the digital sparring goes any further. I guess some people can't take a joke? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-22-10 10:11am - 5132 days | #4 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Hate it, hate it, hate it! Did I mention I hate it? My favorite porn is mostly non-girl/boy stuff so this male helping hand shit is definitely not my cup of tea. I know other members here at PU have offered the "It's not like he's got his cock out" argument, but no thanks. If there's a guy there I say he should serve some kind of a purpose and should have his cock out and use it (preferably not violently!)--otherwise I say get the fuck outta there! InTheCrack sometimes uses them but usually gives pretty explicit warnings, such as "male hands in picture" in the video descriptions and then usually makes sure to keep the ugly mug out of frame, so that's about as much as I can take. I also recently watched a preview video of up-and-coming porn angel Gigi Rivera (and apparent plant enthusiast) at ALS Scan where she was playing a young 'un who had gotten into the liquor cabinet/McMansion set bar and then was "discovered" by the creepy older male owner ((great)grand)daddy figure. By "creepy" I mean , as in Gigi was hot, naked, and acting horny but who the hell cares when this guy walks into the picture! I guess there's an entertainment factor to it but I certainly wasn't going to be turned on. In fact the video keeps replaying in my mind, over and over again...and now I'm starting to lose sleep. If I want to watch some hairy, creepy, douchebag with a growing paunch I can just as well turn off the video and go look in a mirror for free--I don't need to see it in my porn. The only reason I can think of as to why they are there is that maybe they look like a lot of the viewers and it makes them think "Hey, I could be doing that too! Woo hoo!" "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-21-10 08:31am - 5134 days | #18 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Shrooms are stronger?! I thought they were essentially just food poisoning compared to the "strength" of other drugs--albeit one hell of a case of food poisoning! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-20-10 09:54pm - 5134 days | #23 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Don't worry, you wouldn't be the first. In fact, go join the crowd who are equally puzzled/disturbed/creeped out/calling the police about my feelings. Hell, I don't even understand what I'm thinking most of the time! I'd start therapy, but then eventually the therapist would just have to enter treatment too! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-20-10 09:45pm - 5134 days | #34 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
So that's where you've been! I guess until you learn to type with your feet, or get a really open-mined secretary, you're not going to be hanging around here too much. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-20-10 09:42pm - 5134 days | #33 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I've come to love reading your Forum Awards every year...so after porn these are pretty high on my list of loves (admittedly it's a disturbingly short list though ). Don't take the criticism too harshly; it's always easy to laugh at some jokes until they are directed at you, then things might not be so funny. Humor is always going to be offensive and misinterpreted, but at least it means users are reading them, or up until they see their name and go "What the fuck?!!" And hopefully nobody's burning a Wittyguy effigy or sending you death threats (though Xmas is still a few days away, so PU'ers get your threats in now while there's still time! ). To be honest I'm honored when you mention my name if only to stroke my massive...ego. How you do it I don't know--frankly I don't want to know. Plus if I took seriously myself or any of the non-humorous shit people have lobbed my way I would have been hanging from a noose years ago, so award away! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Dec 21, 2010, 07:48pm | |
|
12-20-10 09:25pm - 5134 days | #16 | ||
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Oh no, not the gateway argument...I guess you really are against pot. Well, don't forget correlation is not causation. Some studies support the gateway theory, while others refute it. I think the problem is that if you're dead set against pot than you're going to look toward the studies that say it's a gateway drug, and if you're for it (or at least its legalization) than you're going to cite ones that say it's not. Sounds like shaky reasoning either way, at least for now. Plus how do you know those 10,000 of the original 100,000 weren't going to try cocaine anyway?
Would you consider caffeine a mind altering drug? If so, then a lot of people have a problem, except that beverage makers pump caffeine into fucking everything now (caffeinated beer--what the fuck?!) so we're led to believe that it's okay to be wired 24/7. Starbucks, energy drinks, soda, turbocharged beer--we've all been turned into jumpy, wiry lab rats with elevated heart rates and short attention spans. In my opinion it's always dangerous to try to control the mind-altering substances because in essence you're saying people should not have responsibility over their own thoughts...but I've never said that I have mainstream opinions so you can interpret that one however you see fit. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Dec 21, 2010, 08:28am | ||
|
12-20-10 12:21pm - 5134 days | #396 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I agree but the movies they make are all over the place--romantic comedies, black comedies, thrillers, neo-noirs--so it seems pretty hard to simply like a movie just because they directed it. The only thing I can think of that links them is they way they seem to fill their films with weird, quirky, WTF characters. At least every one of their films that I've seen there will be a character who comes on screen and I go "What the hell was that?!" "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-19-10 08:11pm - 5135 days | #17 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Well, here are a couple of mine in no particular order: - Others have touched upon this already, with guys talking and gonzo porn, but as many here know I absolutely hate douchebags--it's what I like to call the Joe Francis factor. This is where the director/actor/cameraman/whatever thinks he's just God's gift to young horny women everywhere...and of course he's not. First, the young woman is getting paid, so that might sweeten the whole touch-my-cock deal a little. Second, for being the sex fantasy incarnate of horny women you sure do act like an ass and it's ruining my porn. Shut up, get behind or off camera or go join Joe and his Girls Gone Wild band of jackasses. You're making porn, that should be enough of a boast right there, you don't need to overdo it and remind viewers how cool/lucky/hot it all is. - Cybertoad might have hinted at this above, but I'm not a fan of porn stars who try to pad their resume and start to wander outside the business. I'm looking at you, Sasha Grey (and she's calling her lawyer )! But I don't want to hear about or see a professional from the world of the perverted arts try to act in a non-adult film, or write some tell-all memoir/coffee table book, or just engage in some genuine non-porn job. As much as I rant and rave about the need for the full legalization of porn everywhere (public libraries should prepare for a rush of borrowers) I have always liked the outlaw, non-mainstream status of porn. It feels like an exclusive club where the prudes and party poopers of this often shitty world don't exist. I like that it's controversial and not accepted everywhere--I say, good, fuck off and leave us to our depravity! So every time a porn star does some "outside" work I feel a little piece of that once-exclusive world fall away...so sad. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-19-10 07:32pm - 5135 days | #11 | ||
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
And yet alcohol is perfectly legal and practically celebrated as the rite of passage into "adulthood" in America. Sorry, but with the way the laws currently deal with alcohol as compared to marijuana it's just hypocrisy disguised as "protecting" the public. Until the laws are the same, or more balanced towards outlawing alcohol (since it's more dangerous), then I call bullshit. (Edit: If it's not clear, I'm calling bullshit on the laws currently in place, not your argument.) But you do make some good points, including...
I don't know what you mean by "faired worse" but I've never heard of anyone smoking weed to improve their performance at anything except maybe to watch cartoons and eat junk food (which I can already do quite well drug-free). But I think this is the major hurdle to full legalization or at least decriminalization--the stereotype of the dumb, dopey pothead isn't exactly totally erased with many in the legalization crowd. The science is pretty much on their side, as marijuana is no worse than any legal drug already available (though smoking can almost certainly cause cancer, as smoking any organic matter can), but, frankly, it's kind of easy to look at some of these proud spokespeople and just feel like telling them to grow up and get a real job. And while it helps to inspire some great works of music, literature, art (and some hot porn stars apparently), I'd still rather not have a surgeon or airline pilot wander off the job to giggle and search for some Doritos. Still, decriminalization would be a huge relief for state and federal budgets all over the U.S. as an enormous amount of resources are wasted on stopping, arresting, and locking up people who simply didn't have the "medicinal" argument available. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | ||
|
12-18-10 05:31pm - 5136 days | #22 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Thanks for the props and just so I can reach my blasphemous offenses quota for today, here's a plug for that Baby Jesus plug once more--you will be offended all over again! (Note: probably makes one of the most inappropriate Xmas gifts you can find, unless you're either looking to purposely offend the more religiously sensitive, or that special someone likes to get extra close to her faith.) And many thanks and congrats on finishing another year of Forum Awards! Your dedication is amazing...or downright creepy and disturbing, almost criminal. So don't bother trying to escape, authorities are already on the way. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-18-10 05:01pm - 5136 days | #6 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Hey, I thought all you Californians knew about legal pot, or are you just losing your short term memory? From everything I've heard and read in the news, yes, it's all but legal, watered down to "medicinal" status, which means you buy it from a "clinic" or "dispensary"--fancy talk for marijuana store, sort of like "coffee shop" in Amsterdam--instead of some guy on the street. Seriously, I doubt most of these prescriptioners have any medical reason beyond "it silences the voices in my head that keep asking me to buy more pot." Even Time magazine did a cover story on pot in America, so you know it's getting big if it can show up on their radar. So, apparently you find a doctor, he writes a prescription, you fill it out in one of the many clinics (supposedly in the hundreds in California), and you buy your medicine. I doubt any insurance company covers this, but who knows what the future holds! I think your Gov. recently legalized possession (without a prescription) up to an ounce as punishable only as a misdemeanor--so the law sounds like it's growing up, if only at a snail's pace. I don't smoke or partake in it myself, but I also don't think it should be illegal. Honestly I find the whole medicinal argument approach bullshit too. Why can't we just have things for recreation--what the fuck ever happened to that "pursuit of happiness" or was that just a typo written by some 18th C hippie? Let people have their plants and their relaxation, it's probably safer than half the shit we load up on the grocery store, or any the legal science experiments the pharmaceutical companies have convinced us to buy. I mean when's the last time there was salmonella outbreak in "medicinal" marijuana? But back to your original question...Gigi, or any other actress probably has a prescription. If they can show up with proper ID at shoots, and get monthly blood tests, then I'm betting they're responsible enough to to get a prescription. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Dec 21, 2010, 11:59am | |
|
12-14-10 11:13pm - 5140 days | #4 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I don't think that would fly in the U.S.--you'd have a riot on your hands between the morals & values freaks and the zombie army of perverts & douchebags! Also, what's up with calling it "Naked News" if only a couple of them are naked in those pics? I could care less about the news, just cut to the chase any give me the naked! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-11-10 01:49am - 5144 days | #6 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I hope they get it reopened, though governments thrive on technicalities, whether it's being anal about them or just saying "Fuck it" and looking the other way. Considering they offer a service that at least slows the spread of AIDS somewhat (let's be honest, there's only so much you can do with monthly testing) they are probably a vital part of the community, even if that community is made of up porn actors.
Though I wasn't around when AIDS first started appearing in big numbers, I think at least from a historical perspective, the way the federal government first responded is truly horrifying. Here was a brand new, never before seen disease and basically nobody knew anything about it except that at first seemed to be confined to drug users and the gay community...so they go "Uh, we don't give a shit." They didn't make any public announcements, try to warn people, or even have Reagan fucking mention it until 1985. WTF! I blame this early inaction for not just a quicker spread of the virus itself but all the conspiracy bullshit--that it doesn't actually exist, it's a government bioweapon, HIV doesn't cause it, just touching someone can transmit it, etc. And there's still a ton of stigma around it like no other disease; try holding a protest with a sign that says "Thank God for breast cancer" or that "Heart Disease Cures Fags." "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Dec 11, 2010, 01:56am | |
|
12-11-10 12:54am - 5144 days | #6 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I can't say I "like" Obama--he's still a politician after all--but considering the last few guys in his position and the alternatives (both past and future)...well, he's an improvement to say the least. Having said that, he still makes decisions that either piss me off or just leave me scratching my head. Like the current "compromise" he's offering on the expiration of Bush-era tax cuts. I was thinking, "Okay, he's not going to submit to extending the highest income ones too." But then he does. WTF! Or his administration's positions and decisions on any number of things--Afghanistan, DADT, WikiLeaks, the Wall Street bailout. Frankly, I think to label him a "liberal" or "progressive" is to shame such terms. And yet this all still makes him a socialist, Kenyan-born, communist/Nazi-sympathizer, Muslim/possible atheist out to destroy America as we know it...so I guess my first criticisms were kinda mild.
I do kind of like Assange too though, or at least what he's done with Wikileaks, if only because he's pissing governments off again. I'm a little skeptical of the he's-putting-countless-lives-in-danger propaganda the U.S. government has been saying. The U.S. government puts more lives in danger than Assange could ever dream of doing, which is why they get so pissed when their dirty laundry gets aired by someone like him and his site. My view is that the mainstream media has failed miserably in the last few decades, devolving into a handful of massive conglomerates that care more about maintaining stock prices and profits than putting out a decent, worthwhile product (and yes, newspapers, networks and websites are all products). There's no real serious political motive behind any of them beyond status quo maintenance and whoever can get them more money at any given time. The media has done virtually nothing in the last few years that should entitle them to hold more public trust then some Australian hacker with a website. Take the American coverage of the responses to 9/11, say, or just the buildup to the Iraq invasion--what would have happened had there been a WikiLeaks for the whole WMD and "smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud" narrative?! Those are tens of thousands of lives that were lost. And not to sound like too much of an Assange-apologist here but he's only the messenger--other assholes give him the secrets--he only leaks or dumps them, and I doubt he offers any compensation beyond efforts to maintain anonymity. Oh, and and this whole "traitor" bullshit some have called him needs to stop. He's not an American citizen! So either the definition of traitor has radically changed or many of his critics need to take a good long look at a globe. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-09-10 09:34pm - 5145 days | #17 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Nah, he's way too short for me...uh, I mean he's a guy so ! (I still like Katie Holmes though, and Nicole Kidman too while I'm at it) But Scientology can't hold a candle to the megalomaniacal form of Catholicism that haunts Mel Gibson! I mean he had one hot Russian girlfriend/partner/whatever but apparently that didn't stop him from allegedly threatening to kill her! Would you want to be threatened by this guy?! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-09-10 03:58pm - 5145 days | #7 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Yeah, it's a part of the Criterion Collection now. If the film's considered highly explicit and un-simulated (which I guess it is) it's still not porn. Really more of an art house film, though to be honest sometimes I can't really tell the difference...though I am more, uh, "calm" when I watch non-porn films. Plus there's a lot to appreciate that's not pussy-tits-and-ass in the more decent non-adult films, including this one, but I did find it kind of boring (and quite violent). My current non-porn favorite is probably 9 Songs, which has lots of nudity and sex (very un-simulated!) and it's available on DVD if anyone's curious. Sucks that "In the Realm..." led to the pixel regulations given the size of their industry and relative strangeness of the fetishes the Japanese put in porn. (Sorry if that sounds prejudice, they're just very creative when it comes to sex.) I would have a genuine interest in their porn but I detest censorship so I'm not even going to bother when there's pixelation going on--unless I can get a job reviewing the footage to be pixelated! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-09-10 03:41pm - 5145 days | #10 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Hey, I like her too! Too bad she always seems to be playing roles where her character sports a haircut like she's just escaped from a mental institution. That and supposedly she's a Scientologist in real life... Still, who doesn't have a fantasy that their partner has a thing for porn too, like Lewis did in the beginning of the film "Old School" (minus the random stranger coming out of the bathroom to watch it with her!)? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-09-10 03:32pm - 5145 days | #9 | ||
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
That's okay! We believe you--no pictures, no pictures!!
Well I don't remember Twiggy from my own memory but she was probably the first really popular mainstream skinny model in the 20th century, at least that I can think of. And given that this country (and much of the world for that matter) went through a major economic depression only a few decades earlier it's amazing someone that lean became that popular for her looks--and now that's considered being in "good shape!" Actually the difference with Twiggy was that she was (I'm pretty sure) naturally skinny so she had relatively itty-bitty titties compared to the "plump" girls, but today's standard of beauty seems to be more towards C-cup-or-bigger breasts on a Twiggy frame. While I'm sure this is genetically/biologically possible it doesn't appear to be all that common naturally, especially when you start getting into the whole stripper-cum-porn star D-cup look. But what do I know?! I'm not a doctor...sometimes I just want to play one! Interestingly enough Marilyn Monroe, arguably the sex symbol of the last century, would almost be guaranteed to be labeled "fat" or at least "out of shape" by today's thou-shall-not-eat body standards--tells you something about where we've gone in only a few decades. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | ||
|
12-08-10 02:49am - 5147 days | #7 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
In another Daily Beast article mentioned in the original linked one ISPs were listed as the ones who are "ideally positioned to know about every site you visit" (or at least every site for however long they've been your ISP). Kinda scary, but it's also the world we live. I doubt many of us really knows how the 'net works or even how much our ISP does or really knows--and I'm betting many of us don't want to know. I hate to say it but there's probably some bliss in our ignorance. It's like eating meat: most people don't want to see/know how the chicken or whatever was killed and prepared in order to make its way to our plate. All we ask is that it wasn't sick or full of strange chemicals and don't tell our families how many animals have died so we could have dinner! Maybe one day in the future it will all become so transparent (like Wikileaks combined with the corporations who keep tabs on "our" credit scores) that when you go in for a job interview the interviewer will look over your resume, criminal history (if any) and a brief report of your Internet habits. I dread the interview where someone is looking over my past and goes -"So, it says here you were into fisting porn pretty heavily for at least ten years?" -"Uh, yeah, I was young, and, uh, look the web was still pretty new, and I was single, and..." -"Ah don't worry about it--it's the most vanilla fetish I've had to review all day! I really hate all this Internet record keeping." "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Dec 08, 2010, 02:56am | |
|
12-07-10 06:57pm - 5147 days | #4 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Actually on a less personal note, if you're a Mac user--I think OS X and newer--you have a number of options when erasing and/or formatting a drive (Applications > Utilities > Disk Utility > "Erase" tab > "Security Options" button). You can either: 1.) Don't Erase Data; 2.) Zero Out Data; 3.) 7-Pass Erase; or, for the super-paranoid, 4.) 35-Pass Erase. The Don't Erase Data option is what I think most people do when they reformat a drive, as it just opens up you drive for rewriting without actually overwriting the data itself. Kind of like giving somebody an eraser and a chalkboard with a bunch of writing still on it; they can write something new if they need to but the old data is still there for the reading (and incriminating!). The other three are more secure and more thorough erasure methods--and take increasingly longer times for more security. 7-Pass takes seven times as long as the Zero Out and the 35-Pass takes a hearty thirty-five times as long. Basically set it up, walk away for a weekend and hope the power doesn't go out. What that last option is for I don't know as the 7-Pass already says it meets a US DOD standard, maybe it's for the types of people who shit their pants when telemarketers call and identify them by name. I'm not sure what the latest Windows OS disk erase options are (my 5-year old PC is still cruising on Windows XP), but I've never heard of Windows having quite the same options available within the OS, or am I wrong about this with Windows 7? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-07-10 06:22pm - 5147 days | #3 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Fire and lots of it! How good's my data going to be when it's just a smoldering puddle of melted metal? There's probably some lead in there just so you can think twice about getting your grimy IT hands all over my private perversions! But seriously there's a key sentence in the linked article: "Thirty minutes of poking around by a skilled geek who gets their hands on your computer is more than enough to turn up what turns you on-even if you think you've cleared off your computer." "[A] skilled geek who gets their hands on your computer"...well, there's your problem right there--you let someone else touch your computer. C'mon! In my opinion you're just asking for trouble (or a bunch of creepy looks from tech guys). Don't surf for the good stuff at work, especially on someone else's equipment and network (and time if you really want to get anal about it). I'm so paranoid I don't even check my mail unless it's on a secured network (such as an encrypted WiFi line at home), even if it's on my laptop and I make sure I "clear" all the browsing data afterward. And sometimes I get so suspicious I quit my browser and reopen it before going from a, uh, non-questionable site, like a bank site, to something like whatever the hell they're doing over at ALSScan nowadays (totally different kind of transactions I'm sure). And even if I destroy every hard drive on every computer I have ever even sat in front of, let alone surfed the web on, I am sure there's a bunch data at Google (probably with multiple backups spread out around the world... ) that some intern can access within a few minutes on his or her coffee break. And if it's a her...well then that's one less woman who'll likely ever want to marry me. Plus I don't plan on running for office anytime soon (ever) or applying for a really conservative, straight-laced job in my life so it's not a big concern. Oh, and porn's not a crime and I'm adult, so if's a problem I think you really just on a fishing expedition, though in the case of my love of porn you wouldn't have to fish for that long. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Dec 07, 2010, 06:25pm | |
|
12-04-10 03:33pm - 5150 days | #6 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I've always thought Gia Paloma looked somewhat like Oscar-winning actress Hilary Swank, though it could just be my imagination. Hilary Swank is probably a little leaner and in better shape which is odd considering Gia gets a lot more naked in her work. (Maybe only film cameras add 10 pounds?) Gia also has a more "pornified" look to her--big breasts, come-fuck-me makeup, nice big ass--and more titles overall to her name, but no "Karate Kid." Though I will say that Hilary Swank already has a porn-ready name (and probably fans as well ). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-04-10 03:21pm - 5150 days | #34 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
According to your locations, you're both from the UK so maybe it's a British thing...or not. I always thought a lot of that, uh, crap, came from Brazil or possibly Germany. Though to be fair I'm sure America has a few politicians and religious leaders who are into this. Boy, every time I read about this fetish it always makes me think my "fetishes" are pretty vanilla, or they have no flavor at all. I mean if you call that a fetish how can anything else compare! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-01-10 12:08pm - 5153 days | #33 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Aurora certainly hasn't been ravaged by time! In fact if you find her very early video work where she's either solo or girl-girl she doesn't look quite as good as she does today, at least in my opinion. And she has done pretty much the full gambit of hardcore, minus the really abusive and Annette Schwartz-style stuff, but she does have more than 250 credits(!) to her name and they're not Playboy. She sounds pretty intelligent in interviews though, not just another party girl who likes nasty sex, but a sexy woman with a brain and hopefully the foresight to save her earnings (and marry me! ). I think she's done some directing since her MILF designation in her mid 20s and supposedly even wants to go to law school...and now, suddenly, I want to too. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
851-900 of 1958 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 17 | Page 18 | 19 | 23 | 27 | 31 | 39 | 40 | Next Page > |
|