|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
turboshaft (0)
|
| 401-450 of 1958 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Page 9 | 10 | 17 | 24 | 31 | 39 | 40 | Next Page > |
| 03-05-13 07:40pm - 4310 days | #8 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Technically yes, but I'd assume it's not noticeable. And if he is then it might partly explain why the world is running out  (ok, him and our insistence on having the inalienable right to party balloons that float). Thanks a lot Larry. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 03-05-13 07:31pm - 4310 days | #22 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Absolutely it does! Don't think that Fox News' supposed social conservatism would ever keep them from having just one of their blonde army's talking heads (and here's even more) present the "news" (or whatever one could reasonably call the content seen on cable news). Supposedly the state of Utah has some of the heaviest Internet porn traffic, and they're practically a theocracy in some ways, though at least not when it comes to spinning up your personal hard drive. But somehow I don't imagine porn being a tenet of a religion that's petty enough to frown upon drinking coffee and wearing unblessed undergarments. Everyone's got skeletons in their closets, but it's the ones who screech the loudest about how unquestionably clean their own is (and how dirty everyone else's are) who are probably hiding some pretty big secrets. (Which I guess means that at this point I'm hiding huge stockpiles of bibles and wedding magazines in mine.  ) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 03-01-13 11:55pm - 4313 days | #8 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Money is the most obvious answer and also seems to be the most typical in these good-girl-does-porn scandals of the week. The girl in the video says she needed the money, and I think it was before Melissa King won the title, which isn't so much about cash prizes anyway. According to the pageant's site the 2012 finalists had a number of prizes, which seem to vary each year according to the sponsors, but they were all eligible for a $40,000 scholarship to Lindenwood University. Which sounds fine, though LIndenwood is a private school and this statement from their website made my skin crawl: "Lindenwood is an independent institution firmly rooted in Judeo-Christian values. Those values include belief in an ordered, purposeful universe, the dignity of work, the worth and integrity of the individual, the obligations and privileges of citizenship and the primacy of truth." What the fuck does "the primacy of truth" even mean? Are there schools out there that don't hold "truth" as a value? Either way, I doubt I sucked a guy off on video counts for "the dignity of work" part, though apparently sponsoring something as vain as a beauty contest is totally cool with the big dude in the sky.  Either way I ultimately get pissed that all the critics and porn-bashers totally miss the economic reality of "doing it for the money" when they also, and almost unanimously agree to a T, that social welfare of any kind is an unnecessary evil that only breeds parasites and laziness. If these do-as-I-sayers can't grasp why a young, relatively uneducated woman, with few social and economic opportunities chooses (because the concept of free will is also lost on our moral superiors) to do porn than they have no business telling them why it's so bad for them in the first place. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-28-13 06:58pm - 4315 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
If someone got it on their penis I suppose so--ouch!  I remember when I got mine (in the military years ago) they also gave you ziploc bags and extra bandages. Whenever you took off the old bandage you were supposed to put it in the bag, soak it in undiluted chlorine bleach, seal it up, and then finally throw it away. I guess it was pretty risky if someone came in contact and wasn't vaccinated themselves (the CDC website says it hasn't vaccinated the general public since 1972, it's really not a common vaccine anymore). Pain in the ass for a vaccine though; cutaneous (applied to broken skin, not a shot), contagious (obviously), and probably doesn't even get professional scaremonger and snake oil peddler Jenny McCarthy up in arms. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-28-13 03:40pm - 4315 days | #1052 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
It's how our system is set up, with immensely powerful interests defending every part of it, so you would have to turn everything upside down to truly have something resembling universal healthcare. I remember watching a Q&A video with Christopher Hitchens, who was born in Britain but eventually became an American citizen, where he was asked about universal healthcare in the U.S. He responded that he thought that a large part of America don't actually want it, including those who would benefit from it most. I don't remember his answer exactly (it's on YouTube somewhere), but he said people seem to view it as a sort of personal liberty, being free and independent in regards to what they choose to do with their own lives. An insane view in my opinion, if you consider the consequences of not being able to see a doctor, as well as how so many of our laws determine just how much liberty you really have over your own body (drug usage, right-to-die, abortion, etc.). The state of American healthcare is something I find deeply troubling, but the fact that a percentage of Americans may agree with it, no matter how dire the consequences are for them personally, may be even more troubling.  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-27-13 11:51pm - 4315 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Sad news from the bizarre world of beauty pageantry: The Miss Delaware Teen USA 2013 has resigned, handing over her crown (or sash, or whatever) for allegedly starring in a porn scene from the unimaginatively named site GirlsDoPorn. It doesn't seem to be confirmed that King is the girl in the video (here are the screen grabs), but the actress claims to compete in beauty pageants--from an unnamed state, of course--and had just turned 18, in the same month as King apparently. Either way I get a kick out of the notion that a beauty pageant contestant could feel tainted by a single Internet porn video. The Miss USA pageants are in fact run by the billionaire combover that is Donald Trump, and seem to treat their contestants as little more than anthropomorphized Barbie dolls. Is any of this surprising in a society that watches the televised child abuse of Toddlers & Tiaras, and cared deeply that the Miss USA 2009 runner-up had about as progressive a view on gay marriage as the Westboro Baptist Church? Still, if you look good enough to wear a shimmery dress and maintain a frozen smile, all for the honor and glory of a crown and meaningless title, I say you should at least be allowed to do porn as well.  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-27-13 08:32pm - 4316 days | #1050 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Maybe Canada thinks for-profit healthcare is a violation of the Hippocratic Oath? (It certainly isn't what I'd call moral.) Time magazine recently published an article about the wickedly profitable state of American medical care. It wasn't so much about doctors getting the most riches (though they're hardly in danger of applying for unemployment benefits), but how health in the U.S. operates as a continually profitable economy that is separate from the rest of the economy and never suffers recession. Even "nonprofit" facilities can bring in truckloads of money because of the lack of price controls, wide variations in prices between hospitals, and the way customers/patients can't easily comparatively shop they way they can for other consumer goods and services. Of course try to make a movie about this absurd system and you probably would end up with something as nauseating as Saw VI. Some critics interpreted it as subtly criticizing the national healthcare debate at the time, which is probably appropriate considering it's insanely gory torture porn. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-27-13 07:22pm - 4316 days | #4 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I wonder if there's some technological puritanism equivalent to Moore's Law, giving us a predictor of how quickly a tech company will transmogrify itself into a Family Friendly herd of dickless prudes. You'd think they would give a little more respect to those whose libidos did so much to help them out in the early days.  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-27-13 07:04pm - 4316 days | #11 | ||
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
The soft glow of the screen helps. That and the blood of young innocents.  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | ||
|
|||
| 02-24-13 03:49pm - 4319 days | #1037 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Zero Dark 30 has been the progressive controversy du jour since before it was even released. Critics of Obama and Bush II's wars, and their foreign policies in general, have been jumping at the opportunity to give it a lot of shit because it seems to validate the worst theories of how to fight terrorism (torture/"enhanced interrogation"=catching Bin Laden). Defenders of the film have sort taken this all as criticism of the movie itself, which generally isn't the issue. Like saying The Grey or Jaws were bad pictures because they have a negative view of nature and wild animals. They can both be good films with terrible messages. Bu I get more pissed off not so much by the factual minutiae but any overall context that is sacrificed for the comfortable boundaries of a movie's specific story or "interpretation." Just off the top of my head, Charlie Wilson's War is one of the best examples, because it presents a rather lighthearted portrait of a guy who's actions would eventually lead to the Taliban to taking over Afghanistan. It's still an entertaining movie, but afterwards I couldn't help but think Why the fuck was any of that shit supposed to be a good idea? Yeah, Charlie Wilson seemed to have been a rather harmless character for a congressman who was a skirt-chasing, coke-snorting drunkard, but you'd have to have been living in a cave--and probably not one in Afghanistan--to ignore the connection between the U.S.'s supply of weapons to Afghanistan in the '80s and then the dangerous power vacuum once the Soviets left. But hey, we struck a knockout punch to communism and, really, what else matters? Al Qaeda who?  Just my   "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-23-13 03:50pm - 4320 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
It might have been mentioned somewhere else already, but there's also a new documentary about Kink.com produced by James Franco.  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-23-13 03:21pm - 4320 days | #1030 | ||
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
You mean like Fargo? And even if something is a "true story" how much of what we are seeing onscreen is even real? Is that a stunt double--are those her real tits? Is he really driving that car? Wait, this wasn't shot on location? Fake fake fake!  Arguably documentaries can be worse because they are ostensibly "real"--no SFX, stunts, or script. But then you have Errol Morris-style slo-mo retellings, Michael Moore-style editing, and whatever the hell this falls under. At least it's good for some entertainment if not much in the way of education.
Worse! He may not be the Antichrist, but he is "paving the way for the future reign of the Antichrist." Just look what he's doing to the U.S. Constitution (at least according to crap art painter Jon McNaughton):   "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | ||
|
|||
| 02-22-13 12:59am - 4321 days | #17 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
 Rubenesque was the original BBW genre. It is interesting how things have changed in terms of body image and its implied social status throughout history. Fat was indeed perceived as rich in the past--money for food and for servants to do all the heavy lifting--now we've turned it into a shaming device to ridicule people as undisciplined, lazy, and of course too dumb to simply eat what is "right." Funny how in much of today's culture it is okay for the fit and thin know-it-alls to pass off their own dietary choices as how everyone else should eat and live. Even worse it allows a mayor of a large city to further vent his idiotic Napoleon complex on his subjects. In an inverse change of what is actually healthy, fair skin used to be a symbol of being well off. A tanned complexion was seen as that of a laborer's, particularly one who worked outside in the fields. Now we tell people they have a "healthy glow" (dermatologists would say otherwise) or that you "need" some sun (and they need to shut the fuck up and learn what sunburns and skin cancer are! ). Unless you're suffering from vitamin D deficiency--which is pretty difficult if you're not malnourished--a tan should really be avoided. And now we have plastic surgery, a whole other can of worms, and with huge profits to boot! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-21-13 02:08pm - 4322 days | #14 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Yeah, it seems that as usual the moral and decency laws aren't just scared of sex but just plain ignorant of the human body itself, particularly the female's, what with all the mysterious parts and functions. I mean, who could possibly understand any of it?  But the labia aren't equivalent to the penis in that if they're bigger, or appear to be, it means the woman is turned on--they just naturally are that way on many women. The clitoris would be most analogous in that it can change size from arousal, but a lot of porn never even acknowledges it, much less tries to show it. Kinda goes back to the pioneering days of Hustler in that it was revolutionary for being one of the first big porn magazines to show that female genitalia consisted of more than just a gauzy haze of pubic hair. Of course empowering women was probably about the last thing on anyone's mind at Hustler. Even today (or last time I remember looking at one) it seems that Playboy treats the shaven cameltoe as out of focus and vague, since the bush is all but extinct. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-20-13 07:23pm - 4323 days | #12 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Found an article rebutting the empowerment idea of the site, saying: "But when you start a movement that says, 'Our porn-obsessed society thinks your vagina is weird, but it's not,' you risk reinforcing the first part of that message before moving on to the empowerment part." The author also spoke to porn empress Nina Hartley and said that she's "seen 'every type of vulva' in her three decades working in the industry. When young women start out in porn, producers don't send them off for a routine labiaplasty, she says. They tend to instead say, 'You want to take off your clothes and have sex on camera? Yay!'" Thank you Nina. Maybe the site should get rid of the 'like' feature, but it's not that I ever want women to stop taking photos of themselves.  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-20-13 07:13pm - 4323 days | #11 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Isn't that what the large lip haters always ask? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-19-13 08:40pm - 4324 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I read an article on Salon today about the "Labia Pride" movement. This movement is basically an Internet trend to help women, through photo-rich blogs like this one, feel good and proud about the utter uniqueness and normality of their labia and bodies more generally. There's no real equivalent of this for guys, since I assume that's what team sports and Chatroulette are for, but anything that makes women feel better about who they are while also posting pictures of themselves sounds good to me. Still, it blames part of the problem of labiaplasty surgery and big lip embarrassment on Internet porn because it's become such an easy way for young women to see a lot of other women's bodies, particularly those damned pussy lips. The blog I linked points toward mainstream American porn as mostly to blame, though also allowing that "it depends on the porn you look at," mentioning some sites that seem to "break that mold" of small labia (Met-Art, MPL, Hegre, FTV). Which I'm not buying. Plenty of porn starlets have fake tits and Botoxed mugs, but just as many have small, natural breasts and lovely, uncut labia. And this is in mainstream porn. Hell, the guys seem to trend towards hairlessness, steroid-fueled muscles, and perpetually hard third-arm-sized erections, but are male viewers so insecure that they think this is the norm or that they need surgery? I blame the gilded assholes who offer such surgery as cosmetic "enhancement" (hey, it's not done for free) and the class of narcissists who willingly go in for such things, even offering such nuggets of wisdom as "I think she [her labia] looks better in a jar than hanging down there." Yes, someone really said that, and then it was put on TV. Am I alone in being perfectly happy whenever I get access to a woman's labia, regardless of their size, shape, or color?  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-19-13 03:59am - 4324 days | #62 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Also to add to this Dracula theme, I would think, since in the original book he (you?!) had crates full of Transylvanian dirt shipped to England that you might be into salirophilia, or being turned on by literally getting dirty with someone or getting them dirty. Also mentioned in the link's list, hematolagnia (vampire fetish) definitely applies, and maybe somnophilia (watching someone sleep) as well. Though if Dracula is undead and hundreds of years old and then feeds on the blood of younger victims, making them undead too, isn't that sort of a necrophilia? (The whole I'm-hundreds-of-years-older-than-you thing is probably some sort of chronophilia.) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-19-13 03:40am - 4324 days | #61 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I'm sure there are, but for a guy with the username Dracula and location listed as Romania you already have us plenty worried!  On the plus side it sounds like a pretty inexpensive fetish, and how many gals (or guys) do much to cover up their necks? I bet there's even a whole thing about women who like to wear chokers, neckties, or even neck rings for their sexual kicks. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-19-13 03:25am - 4324 days | #13 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
No guns and no porn? That leaves both hands free to do mischief, and as they say about idle hands...  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-19-13 03:22am - 4324 days | #12 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
The classic battle cry of the moral dictators who wish to be society's parents: Won't someone think of The Children?! What about the rest of us, goddammit? Won't someone think of the adults?!  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-19-13 03:04am - 4324 days | #13 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
It doesn't sound that wrong to me, though it doesn't sound that right either. But even if the writer had put "voted wrestling [...] off the 2020 Olympic program" it would still sound kinda weird to me--"voted out" or just "removed" sounds clearer. "Voted off" sounds like they're channeling Survivor, as an island is an actual tangible thing that you could vote something or someone off of. That's my pet peeve .But I"m no grammar Gestapo, and I generally take issue with people's arguments and/or tone, rather than whatever piddly little speaking and writing mistakes they may make. It's why I got in such a huff over the Jessie Rogers thread a couple weeks back. Her stupid-ass argument, which seems to be made every time someone even looks at a gun wrong, was my beef, not her grammar or anything else she may have messed up on. Also, I found another "off of" link that you may find interesting: motivatedgrammar.wordpress.com/2012/07/31/on-off-of/. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-17-13 12:17am - 4326 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Pretty interesting article, even if it only analyzes IAFD--where are all my lovely Euro ladies?  .An interesting paragraph about the average number of onscreen partners between men and women:
Frankly I would have thought Nina Hartley would have "slept with" (really misleading term for porn) far more men than 199, but what a lucky bunch of 199 men! And I knew Tom Byron had been around since the '80s but I wouldn't have thought he had the most onscreen partners. In a documentary I watched recently Randy West mentioned the number of women he had slept with and it was a few thousand and it didn't sound unrealistic; 3 decades nonstop, including all that gonzo he did as director/actor. But who's counting? The article also compared porn to being more like a sport, since there was so many genres and types of fetishes, though I find porn far less offensive and harmful than any sport. Seriously, when's the last time a bunch of drunken porn fans went crazy and had themselves a victory riot? I guess it would be hard to turn over cars and break a lot of things with only one free hand, but still.  It also dispelled the idea that the majority of women get in, do one shoot, and leave. It says the majority do more than one, though it still quotes anti-porn porn gossip blogger Luke Ford: "Most girls who enter the porn industry do one video and quit. The experience is so painful, horrifying, embarrassing, humiliating for them that they never do it again." Which I guess could be true if that one video is Max Hardcore or something similarly traumatic but it doesn't really say much about how "bad" the industry is to women. You know, as opposed to how humanely and respectfully they will be treated in pretty much any other job armed with an equivalent education and background. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Feb 17, 2013, 04:35am (turboshaft: Removed links) | |
|
||
| 02-16-13 11:22pm - 4326 days | #6 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I don't think they're talking about worker rights, but the strippers' individual rights as human beings, though even that smells of bullshit if they're choosing to work of their own free will. This is something the moral crusaders always seem to either forget or just ignore altogether--that women would freely choose to enter these lines of work. I guess women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies...until it offends the delicate sensibilities of our learned guardians of decency and family values. Still, it's sad that anybody is even seriously considering this, because freedom isn't a set of rules dreamed up by the most emotionally fragile in society. It also includes protection for things that may be offensive and distasteful. Maybe they've been inhaling too many toxic fumes from all those active volcanoes they have. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-14-13 08:08pm - 4329 days | #8 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
It worked for John Travolta, didn't it?   "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-14-13 07:53pm - 4329 days | #7 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Don't forget the longer term commitments that have influences from porn; the nipple and genital piercings, the tramp stamps, and all those crazy (i.e., unnecessary bullshit) genital cosmetic surgeries. I don't think all this came from girls just sitting around and seeing who could come up with the most creative things to do with the female body.  IMHO, if you watch enough porn of a reasonable variety then you get to see all shapes, sizes, and "enhancements" of things and would think there's really nothing to worry about. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-14-13 07:25pm - 4329 days | #6 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
You're not kidding, plus no matter how hot you think a women looks in high heels--I certainly don't, always too "strippery" for me--what they can do to a women's feet after enough time looks like something out of a torture-porn horror film. A bad case of hammer toe is not for the weak stomached!  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-14-13 07:08pm - 4329 days | #40 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Hey, maybe that's how it fights depression. If it can keep you occupied it seems like less of an opportunity to become depressed. And while I'm not a doctor, it's certainly what I would prescribe (which is probably why I'm not a doctor). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-12-13 12:21pm - 4331 days | #21 | ||
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
No, you really can't keep it all, and even if you wish to be buried with a boner, you still can't take it with you. Duplication is a good idea but it makes things doubly insane in terms of what to keep and what to toss, because if you have a certain amount of space then you're bound to want to fill it up instead of keeping half the drives for the originals and then the other half for backups. It's the same mentality that when you buy more food (like in bulk or when it's on sale) you just end up eating more than you would, instead of saving for later. And like food, my eyes can sometimes deceive me in terms of what will be good for the rest of my body. Anyway, I would recommend a good review of material when you have time. Not going through every single photo or every frame of video, but a review of what you can live without (okay, that's a little vague), what you like, and what you love so much you can't live without (minus whatever you're wife or whoever would get really pissed about ).I've got some stuff that took me a while to build up; I kept going back to the site and didn't properly organize it afterwards, plus the site used only proper names and without numbers so it was a mess in terms of organization (probably morals too, now that I think about it ). But this stuff I've definitely backed up--hell, I've triplicated it, even though the site's not going anywhere and I just don't sit down and watch it that often.
I sort of agree here, in terms of the way sites "reorganize" and fuck over hoarders and organizers, or they just don't have much apparent organization in the first place (so like half the videos have either "hole" or "pink" in the title--really original and helpful there). But some stuff I can't see going away totally. For example, much of the classic stuff out there, at least how the industry vaguely defines it, is still around online or even in DVD form if you're desperate. I imagine that things like Evil Angel and Max Hardcore videos are still going to be warping minds and attracting weird loyal fan cults well into the future, no matter what kind of oppressive dystopian precrime/Minority Report hellscape we've crafted for ourselves. Even in the Escape from L.A. future (or 2013...) the San Fernando valley is flooded and people are still obsessed with sex--granted, the U.S. is a theocracy and eye patch wearing and motorcycle riding seem to be bigger priorities, but still. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | ||
|
|||
| 02-12-13 11:44am - 4331 days | #20 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Never mess with an industry that might employ slave labor! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-12-13 11:37am - 4331 days | #25 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
anyonebutme, also:
Because of the fact that you can haul around a laptop you see a lot of people who aren't too careful and beat/abuse the shit out of their laptops anyway (or phones, tablets, children, etc.). Still, a good visual indicator of who not to lend delicate things to. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-12-13 11:31am - 4331 days | #24 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
But the desktop is still ultimately cheaper, right? I understand that when you get a laptop it comes with everything you need, but unless you're going with a super pricey monitor or gaming mouse and keyboard, then adding the necessary extras to a desktop generally doesn't raise the price that much (since there are also insanely priced versions of everything now). And there's probably no reason to add a printer (which would be some crappy inkjet anyway) or extra software so it's still not too expensive. Beyond portability what's the "better fit" argument for a laptop in this case? The discrepancy in display size alone seems to make a desktop the better option. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-12-13 11:21am - 4331 days | #23 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
And the truly heroic among us can do this with an entire desktop machine (good reason to consider putting the tower on the floor). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-12-13 11:18am - 4331 days | #22 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
You mean that useless hey-fuck-you-buddy feature they put on IBM's ThinkPad laptops (back when IBM was still making the things)? I knew somebody who use to have one of those and everybody hating it because of the ability of the red dot/pointy thing to send the cursor off into oblivion every time you tried to type. We used to call it the StinkPad behind the guy's back (or to his face, it was a deeply hated machine). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-07-13 07:40pm - 4336 days | #45 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
This is precisely why I can't stand much reality TV myself; it's comes off as so cruel and petty. From the child-abuse-as-beauty-pagent spectacle of Toddlers and Tiaras, to the depressing world of Hoarders, to the loudmouthed egotism of Donald Trump's The Apprentice, it's sadism and schadenfreude marketed as harmless entertainment. Something comparable in the porn world would be like saying that what Max Hardcore does is no worse than the way women are treated in a Playboy shoot. And while people seem to be more concerned about the kinds of people who are willing to go on these reality shows, what does it say about all of us viewers who can't turn away? I'm guessing it makes us feel a little better about our own lives in comparison. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-06-13 10:05pm - 4337 days | #41 | ||
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
If that's what they choose to do, on their own, without all the paternalistic and religious bullshit that's trying to run every minute detail of their lives, good for them. I'm all for people living their lives however it fits to make them happy without infringing on others' right to do the same. But when they start proselytizing it as some sort of "good" way for everyone to live then I have a problem. Though I haven't yet sat down and watched The Bachelor, the concept of the show, or at least what I understand of it, would make me agree with a lady not wanting to kiss the dude who made it onto the show. "Have a rose and a smile and shut the fuck up!"
Talk about teaching to the test!  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | ||
|
|||
| 02-06-13 12:06pm - 4337 days | #37 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
If it is taught as only a part then it is not abstinence-only education, it is comprehensive sex education (relatively speaking). But why you would teach abstinence to any teenager with a pulse is beyond me, it makes about as much sense as teaching teetotalism to get them to avoid drinking. It's also much of the same wishful ignorance of that whole "Just Say No" movement from the '80s, coming largely from the same type of puritanical egos who believe in the silver bullet powers of zero tolerance and guilt trip morality. I agree it hurts the vast majority of kids who know better and realize that their perfectly natural sexual feelings and inclinations are just that: natural. Of course add in some finger-pointing adults on some personal crusade to stamp out pleasure wherever they can and you end up with some truly creepy things like purity balls, purity rings, and virginity pledges. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Feb 06, 2013, 12:09pm | |
|
||
| 02-05-13 09:40pm - 4338 days | #34 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Hey, if this Campfield guy is talking about abstinence-only education, then I might agree with him. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-05-13 09:24pm - 4338 days | #33 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Then hundreds of millions of US citizens are wrong. It has no effect on people's rights, but the order of the amendments is not based on importance but the way that the Constitution is structured. James Madison, who originally proposed twenty amendments, wanted them added to the relevant section each one amended, but it was later decided to have only ten and add them on at the end instead. The Virginia Declaration of Rights, which influenced the Bill of Rights, has much the same protections, but is divided into sixteen sections. Interestingly, it does not use the phrase "right of the people to keep and bear Arms," but instead says "trained to arms," in reference to "a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people." Imagine trying to argue every gun rights case with that wording instead of the way the 2nd Amendment is written. Of course the same section also says "that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty," and I seriously doubt that would have been followed either. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-05-13 08:24pm - 4338 days | #32 | ||
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I also got the impression that she was in favor of less gun control, though I haven't watched all of her videos.
A few maybe, but most of them seem to secretly love sex just as much as the rest of us. But there are always some strange bedfellows in politics--literally and figuratively. From the governor gone missing while "hiking the Appalachian Trail" to the huckster televangelist admitting to buying meth for a male hooker/"masseuse," never underestimate the humbling deviance of our moral authoritarians. And on the topic of guns, there is a conservative women's group, hilariously named the Independent Women's Forum, who, along with NRA, recently appeared before congress to argue that guns help to make women safer. They sort of have a point, but I'm extremely skeptical of a group that was formed in response to the alleged feminist attacks against Clarence Thomas during his Supreme Court confirmation hearings. That would be like a women's domestic violence group forming to defend O.J. Simpson. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Feb 05, 2013, 09:25pm (turboshaft: used wrong word) | ||
|
|||
| 02-04-13 05:37pm - 4339 days | #24 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I almost forgot to mention Mary Carey's run for governor of California! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-04-13 05:06pm - 4339 days | #23 | ||
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
State laws vary, generally 18 to purchase long guns (shotguns, rifles) from licensed dealers and 21 for handguns (pistols), though some states have 18 as a minimum for both. Federal law is a purchase age of 18 for long guns and 21 for handguns, though for possession (like from private sales or if a gun just happens to fall out of the sky) the age is 18 for handguns and there is no minimum for long guns. Ammo sales are supposed to be restricted and it's based on the belief of the dealer but almost no one requires background checks on ammo or requires a credit card to purchase (police tend to trace ammo to a gun, and a gun to a dealer/registered owner). Even if Jessie isn't a citizen she could probably still buy a firearm (rifle or shotgun from a dealer) if she's an alien resident (with a valid state photo ID) and passes a background check.
I don't know about that. I would say it's somewhat comparable with the 1st Amendment arguments that some producers make, like Larry Flynt, John Stagliano, or even Max Hardcore, though those guys have had more a stake in it (forced to appear in court) than Jessie making a nonsensical YouTube video. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | ||
|
|||
| 02-04-13 03:58pm - 4339 days | #20 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I watched the entire first video, but I think my brain pretty much gave up when she said "this is getting a little out hand" within the first minute of the video. Yes, mass shootings in particular and gun violence in general are tragic--is anybody even arguing that they aren't?--but it really isn't getting out of hand. Violent crime overall has been declining in the United States for the last 15 years, and the vast majority of shooting deaths occur outside of the media's emotional bubble, i.e., when the victims are largely affluent, white, and suburban. The majority occur with illegally purchased handguns (and almost never involving the gun control targets of assault rifles, body armor, or even unusual ammunition) in urban areas, frequently as the result of other criminal activities, such as physical violence, theft, gangs, and the drug trade. Both sides, unfortunately, have their priorities fucked up. The gun lovers turn what has essentially become, if we're being honest, a Constitutionally protected hobby into what some argue is a precious last line of defense between what they view as a free country (gun ownership is protected above everything else) and a tyranny. I think the results of the Waco siege would beg to differ with whomever has the asinine idea that they can stand up to the federal government with a personal arsenal. The gun controllers target the cosmetics of weapons and have yet to really effectively take on the NRA as the insane lobbying group that it really is, as well as our fetishistic gun culture. There are rational and reasonable arguments for legal gun ownership, but gigantic magazines, fully automatic fire, and open carry aren't the places to start. And regardless of whatever proof-that-you're-a-real-man firepower you currently own nobody is even seriously talking about confiscation, except the armed paranoids who can't sleep without a weapon in arm's reach. Plus with an estimated 250 million+ privately owned firearms in the U.S. this would be wholly impractical anyway. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Feb 04, 2013, 04:02pm | |
|
||
| 02-04-13 03:13pm - 4339 days | #16 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
And the requisite piss-poor interpretation of facts and history that such passion can induce. Her video doesn't seem to go any deeper than the usual "If the people can't have guns, then the government shouldn't be able to have any either" line of gun nuttery, but she does offer up some other ridiculous nuggets of battiness. Here's one from about the 3:00 mark: "History has proven that gun control is not effective, and has killed a quarter of billion people worldwide, as did Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin".  WTF?! I get the dictator name-dropping, that's almost predictable in any gun argument at this point (Hitler took away guns, Hitler killed millions of people; i.e., since you want to take away my guns, you obviously want to kill people too), but the random body count is way out there. Look, I get that she has done anal scenes before, but that doesn't mean she just gets to pull wild figures out her ass whenever she feels like. It's just debasing the discussion to a level that feels more like a parody than anything that can be taken seriously. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-04-13 02:52pm - 4339 days | #15 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
That still won't change her date of birth, unless she's been lying about her age (a career-killing risk in the post-Traci Lords world of porn), which her IAFD page lists as August 8, 1993. So, despite Jessie's worry that "they're just trying to take things away from us," as she says early in the video, she's not even old enough to legally buy a handgun for the government to take away. Also, is she already an American citizen anyway? She keeps referring to "our 2nd Amendment rights" throughout the first video, though I would hope even she would understand that simply being able to buy a gun as a legal resident does not mean someone is a citizen. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-01-13 05:01pm - 4342 days | #89 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I don't think I'd even heard of Lily Labeau until this thread--which should tell you something about how much I really know about porn--but I found this photo of her with her shaved head from her Twitter feed. It's not a terrible look, but I think it's reminder of how not all women should go about imitating the hairstyles of Sigourney Weaver or Demi Moore (both of whom did so for what were basically masculine roles, BTW). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-01-13 04:41pm - 4342 days | #88 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
What people will be out work exactly? Below-minimum wage landscapers and day laborers? I'd be way more worried about companies moving their production overseas than simply giving jobs to illegals. Calm blue ocean, RB, calm blue ocean. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-29-13 07:01pm - 4345 days | #64 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
And if you prefer your Law & Order lady blonde, there's always Elisabeth Röhm, who to me looks like a cleaned up Amy Brooke, of course, without all the insane onscreen anal work. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-29-13 06:41pm - 4345 days | #71 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Sorry about comparing you to the Mittbot, his comment was just the first thing that came to my mind.
He's your typical politician dipshit who never seems to be able to fully grasp the sheer offensiveness of whatever dumbass comment is coming out his mouth at the moment. Granted, I have said and continue to say plenty of stupid, totally offensive things--just check the forum --but I've never uttered hot air on the scale of things like that women binders comment, or self-deportation, or taken a verbal shit on 47% of voters because I see them as a bunch of entitled freeloaders.What about Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas then? He's been accused of being obsessed with porn and having a thing for large breasted women. Just kidding! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-29-13 06:25pm - 4345 days | #17 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I guess they're the same type of account, though people rarely use checks anymore for everyday transactions and you usually have to pay for any checks, i.e. banks don't want to give them out just for opening a new account--pay up, assholes! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 401-450 of 1958 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Page 9 | 10 | 17 | 24 | 31 | 39 | 40 | Next Page > |
|
