|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
Tree Rodent (0)
|
| 201-250 of 708 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Page 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 14 | 15 | Next Page > |
| 03-15-12 07:21am - 4665 days | #9 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User  Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Yes Ed, I agree. Sometimes a site automatically makes your email address the username, but I quite often use a squirrel name when they don't, because it is very common on the internet. If it were a very individual name I wouldn't use it, but I think your view is becoming increasingly correct, and therefore it is becoming an increasingly worrying situation. It pisses me off because I'm not doing anything illegal (although neither are those who try to obtain information legally), but I consider it an invasion of privacy. That's why I have not used Google since they changed their policy. Bing works just as well. Should I even worry about my privacy or let it all hang out? If I want to retain it, I don't want anyone sticking their nose into my business. I am feeling slightly ambivalent at the moment. What if it does no harm? Maybe I should be more angry - though I am nearly almost as permanently angry as RB. My default setting and gut instinct is to treat all bastards like the enemy until I know or suspect different. Hang on let's check - yes anger setting very high as per normal. Edited on Mar 15, 2012, 07:26am | |
|
||
| 03-14-12 04:11pm - 4666 days | #7 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Yes Micha, that's a good point, but I am always proud of my reviews and comments, and take a lot of time to get them right. Of course I don't know in advance if I'm going to like a site or not, so maybe it would be better to choose a different name, just in case. I like the new avatar Toad - up there with the poison arrow frogs, and the two smiling friend frogs, ones. Edited on Mar 14, 2012, 07:10pm | |
|
||
| 03-14-12 10:35am - 4666 days | #3 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
No, just the usual drugs. I'm an honest upstanding citizen. | |
|
||
| 03-14-12 07:10am - 4666 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
After logging in for the first two days of WTF Pass membership, I logged in after the weekend only to find I could not access any of the sites. I mailed both WTF support and also the mail address on the password page to no avail. No reply, nothing to give a reason for the lock out. After giving it more than 24 hours I contacted Epoch. They replied within a couple of hours, and said they would try to do get me access again. They were true to their word. At least WTF replied to them. The one thing that surprised me was the reason given for the lock out. Maybe I am slightly paranoid in thinking they didn't like my comment in the Comments section of Porn Users, and that was the reason for the lockout, or maybe the reason is a genuine one. If so, that has never happened to me before, though I have heard of it happening to others. I use one computer from one place, and don't share passwords. Whatever happened, I would like to say a big thanks to Epoch. I cancelled my membership to WTF after their lack of response to my four emails, and would not join again, but Epoch are one of the best. Thanks Epoch. Below is a part of the mail where it states the reason for being locked out. "Hello. This user has been suspended by our security system with following messages: 50 login attempts by thesquirrel from 19 IP ranges in 6 countries 11 successful logins by thesquirrel from 8 IP ranges in 3 countries People from too many countries using this username. It may be on a password site. People from too many different ISPs using this username. It may be on a password site" | |
|
||
| 03-07-12 11:26am - 4673 days | #24 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
It appears Cybertoad is the only member who agrees with me on this, and admin isn't going to change it. For the record I don't believe most members abuse the system, and do use their vote in an honest way. If they do trust voting purely for raffle reasons, and furthermore, if they do review or comment purely to receive raffle tickets, it does undermine the system and integrity of the site. I don't think we are at that stage, although for complete integrity there should be no raffle. That doesn't mean I don't enjoy winning. I am opening up a few old wounds from when one member started talking about samey cookie cutter reviews. Would members still review or comment if they didn't receive raffle tickets? I certainly would and so I believe would the old guard. Once again for the record, I think they get it right most of the time, but I am virtually out on my own on this one. I do realise the reasons behind raffle tickets. It is to stimulate activity, and it seems to do that job very well. | |
|
||
| 03-07-12 10:56am - 4673 days | #22 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
For obvious reasons - to get in the raffle, members would have to review or comment on sites or put in five replies. A trust vote would then be from the heart rather than used in order to get a raffle ticket. | |
|
||
| 03-07-12 09:46am - 4673 days | #5 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
21 Sextury. Haven't seen a network close to being as good as that one. | |
|
||
| 03-07-12 09:37am - 4673 days | #20 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Thanks Cybertoad, and also graymane. It's nice that I'm not completely on my own, and out of tune with all PU members. Thanks also to Khan for taking the time to put together a reply. I always presumed that Khan, or some member of staff, had to read every single thing posted on this site, to weed out the undesirable stuff. I wasn't thinking about what that could do to someone until turboshaft's post. Edited on Mar 07, 2012, 09:44am | |
|
||
| 03-05-12 12:17pm - 4675 days | #15 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
First of all there aren't two number 4's. I always thoroughly reread my posts and reviews so I don't make those kind of mis....ahh... It is the stuff I expected to hear, although admittedly more positive than I expected. You have things the way they are for what you consider good business reasons. You mostly get things right. Incidentally fwiw I consider the small improvements to TBP last year to be brilliant because they improved on what was already close to darn near perfect. 2. Yes, I meant don't count them until they reach ten points. That maybe considered discouraging to newbies, so will have the opposite effect, to the one I wished. 3-7. Not sure that Rick concentrating on other things is so good for PU, however that Ken is working with Kevin on something we might like, sounds encouraging. I had a feeling members probably voted in batches of five to receive raffle tickets. It happened to me this week, for I think only the second time, and somehow it didn't feel quite right. For me it weakens trust votes. They should really count. I understood the reasons behind what you do, almost before your reply. Everything you do, is done for a reason. It was nice to have the time to post some feedback and ideas. I am not around much nowadays, and that will probably remain the same for quite some while. If you look at the top contributors, most have been around more than 3 years and are still active. That is a very healthy sign. Let us all hope the recession doesn't shut down PU or TBP, and that Rick's enthusiasm doesn't wane. One last point. I think most of us enjoy your contributions. It's a shame you have to remain neutral a lot of the time, because with your experience and knowledge, you have the potential to contribute far more than any other member here. Your wealth of experience possibly makes you the most interesting member of all. The Doctor Manhattan of PU. | |
|
||
| 03-05-12 11:50am - 4675 days | #14 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Likewise. Like it or not (or maybe he's completely indifferent) Khan is not only the boss, he's a character and forum member whose opinion is not only important, but entertaining. The downside is, for obvious reasons, he has to try and stay as neutral as possible. | |
|
||
| 03-05-12 10:57am - 4675 days | #10 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Capn, you are right in many respects. Doing the things I suggest may have a detrimental effect on PU. However I was looking at it from the perspective of what a detrimental effect, negative votes have. To give cash draw tickets for negative or positive votes could increase the number of negative votes and therefore could mean new members leave as they feel unwanted and annoyed that their best efforts and honest opinions are being looked at in an unfriendly way. It could convey a "we don't like strangers around here" sort of feeling. I don't want to see newbies crushed before they have a chance to develop. The future of the site depends on it. My suggestions are mainly driven by wanting to see newbies given a fair chance, and this place being about quality rather than quantity. I do understand things are as they are for a reason. It was considered the best way to conduct business, so I could be very wrong about my suggested tweaks. So Capn, I'm not saying you are wrong, because you could be very right. My so called improvements could have the opposite effect to what I am trying to achieve. I put forward my ideas purely as suggestions, to see what the response would be. Thanks to those who replied. | |
|
||
| 03-05-12 09:10am - 4675 days | #29 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Couldn't agree more Denner. This site has survived longer than most. What effect the economy is having on PU/TBP no one knows except Rick and Khan. It would be a shame to see it close, as the community here is an exceptional one. Two important things are imo, make the newbies welcome, and when you joing a porn site, use the link from PU/TBP. | |
|
||
...to you great bunch| 03-05-12 09:04am - 4675 days | #28 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I very much agree with what you say. That there is nothing, or very little which caters for your particular taste still surprises me. Porn is like tv in one sense. It tries to appeal to as many as possible, and falls into homogeneity. My suggestion and Dr Denner's, is not a cure, more a way of dealing with the lack of your favourite material. The following may be a poor analogy, but imagine if you love dining at a high class restaurant with top class food washed down with some vintage Dom Perignon. If that restaurant closes and you end up in the local fast food diner six days a week, you start to lose your appetite. If however you are stuck in Ethiopia, or the middle of some desert, where there is very little food for a couple of months, that fast food restaurant begins to look very good indeed. Now how about forking out for a month's membership to that one site you refuse to pay for, but which appeals? Quality over quantity any day. Sometimes it pays to pay. | |
|
||
| 03-05-12 08:51am - 4675 days | #7 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Thanks for the feedback on my little rant guys. It was nice to have enough time to put together a post. Not having enough time to view much porn or be around here certainly stops me being jaded. Which brings me to the messmer thread...see you there. | |
|
||
| 03-04-12 05:03pm - 4676 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
The following is a waste of time, but for once I have a few minutes where I can relax and write a load of rubbish. None of the ideas will be used, and nothing is going to happen. Purely for the sake of conversation here are a few ideas which I think would improve PU. For the record TBP imo is close to perfection in the way it is set out. Here are my suggestions for a few tweaks to PU. 1. Give the User Poll a week, or at the very least, a minimum of five days, to allow everyone to register a vote (yes I know you can still register a vote after months, but by that time an old poll is out of site and out of mind). It also allows a conversation surrounding the poll to be built up and stimulate ideas and opinions. 2. Keep a newbie's review from being official until he has built up ten points not five. 3. At the same time do not allow any trust voting to be awarded until that newbie status is complete. A new user called qualitycontrol was hit with a negative trust vote for a short review. The review may be short but that doesn't exactly make a new user feel welcome, and I don't think he deserved a negative. We need to allow time for members to develop. This site is hurt if new users are not encouraged. 4. Do not award cash draw tickets for trust votes. 4. Announcements - one every year seems inadequate. Maybe there is no news, but how about feedback from those in control, even if it is something like mentioning how to use the site properly. For instance, I never even noticed you could add favourite members until that poll appeared. I thought it was just for favourite porn sites. In fact overall we need more feedback and comments from Rick, Khan, Vegas Ken, whoever. I don't agree that PU is about the users. It isn't, and shouldn't be. It is Rick's site, and he and Khan are in charge. I don't mind that at all, in fact I would like to see more of them around, and contributing. 5. Only the best comments should be awarded cash draw tickets. In fact there should be two different types of comment: The review comment and the comment comment. For instance - "Does anyone know if this site uses Russian models?" or "is this site still updating?" or "the download speed has dropped recently," should be separate from the review comments. 6. Two tier reviews. The first review on the home page should be a top drawer review, and the second should be one that is not quite top drawer. That way all new reviews get a chance to be on the home page, but a good review is never replaced by a poor one. There should be room for two new reviews on the home page. 7. Late addition. It's an old one but - end anonymous trust voting. Not world changing or PU changing. I would ask though to mostly refrain from hitting new users with negative trust votes. Save that for the really untrustworthy ones. Edited on Mar 04, 2012, 05:12pm | |
|
||
| 03-04-12 04:21pm - 4676 days | #18 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I was going to say the same thing as Dr Denner. Cold turkey for about four weeks minimum should do it. We're all becoming too blase about the fantastic amount of cheap quality porn out there. Maybe there are one or two niches each of us may like, but not get from run of the mill porn sites. But if you're a porn lover, there is a lot to be happy about, at least we certainly should be happy. We only need to enjoy 0.5 per cent of the porn that is out there to be permanently engaged in watching porn every hour for every day for the rest of our lives (no matter how long we live), and frankly for me, that is too much time watching porn. Sometimes hobbies have to be left alone for a while, for the love to return. Messmer you have explained your situation, but if you have a computer, find a different hobby for a while. You may not be able to get out, but access to a computer and tv are two things you do have. | |
|
||
| 03-03-12 05:28pm - 4677 days | #2 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I don't much like strange perspectives (including those diagonal type shots which I really hate too). I also prefer to see the whole model rather than closeup groin shots with feet and legs cut off. Seeing the whole girl from a normal "human" perspective having straight sex with no hair pulling and choking etc may become more rare as the recession continues to hit. It's like they feel they have to do something to stand out and sell an attractive nude girl. Hang on a minute, you don't need to sell an attractive nude girl. All you have to do is show her in all her glory with no tricks, no fake camerawork, no gimmicks, and men will buy buy buy. Do they really need to go to extremes to sell gorgeous nude girls or gorgeous nude girls having sex? Okay, maybe they do. I suppose some of us don't understand or like the current state of porn. It is only personal taste, and sites are merely trying to find a niche they can cash in on. But no, I don't like it either. | |
|
||
| 03-02-12 01:55am - 4678 days | #11 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
They are making a ton of money, but like all multi national companies, they want more and more, and don't have any conscience about what they have to do to achieve that. Only place to hit them is in their pockets. | |
|
||
| 03-01-12 03:47pm - 4679 days | #8 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Yes, let's hope this loses them some customers. I followed one of Wittyguy's links concerning how to stop using google, and found Bing mentioned. I was wondering what effect it would have if everyone starts googling Bing. | |
|
||
| 03-01-12 02:47pm - 4679 days | #6 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I think what happens capn, is that the information is stored if you don't have an account, but isn't supposed to be directly linked to you. At least that is what is supposed to happen in theory. Even if you're unregistered, I think they can still trace all the data back to you. The Canadian government (under pretence of stopping paedophiles) is intending to force disclosure of all your online data whenever they wish. | |
|
||
| 03-01-12 01:32pm - 4679 days | #4 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I don't have an account with google, but I use their search engine. I have always presumed they were able to trace my steps without having an account and signing in. It's easy to use the google search engine without having an account, but as far as I know, it's still the same lack of privacy. Or does not having an account protect you? I have always presumed the answer is no. Never used them for mail but use their maps, which are very useful for finding directions. | |
|
||
| 02-29-12 12:15pm - 4680 days | #7 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Woof woof woof woof - I'd watch Charlotte any time in anything. Absolutely stunning, and beats just about any porn star. I remember her being on the Frank Skinner talk show when she was about 15. Skinner remarked how much she'd grown, and then added to the audience. "well you would, wouldn't you?" Just my opinion and taste. Sorry to derail your thread Cybertoad. | |
|
||
| 02-29-12 08:55am - 4680 days | #3 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Was just thinking I'd watch the porn version if Charlotte Church played Alice. | |
|
||
| 02-29-12 08:33am - 4680 days | #40 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Messmer you are sure to have heard of this but there are some new sites from Mature Mega pass. Mature Magazine and Mature Retro are two of them. Unfortunately they appear to be hardcore, but there might be something of interest in there especially on Mature Retro. | |
|
||
| 02-24-12 07:06pm - 4685 days | #6 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I can honestly say I have steered well clear of those fake breast sites. Never signed up to Brazzers, Reality Kings or Naughty America, or even DDF. I also steer well clear of those with pre checked cross sells and regional discrimination. I vote with my pocket. | |
|
||
| 02-23-12 07:15am - 4686 days | #19 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Yes, spot on Denner. Sometimes I see what I think is a great clip on some file sharing site, decide to join that site next, only to find it's a clip I already have, from a site where I was a member a short time ago. | |
|
||
| 02-22-12 07:19pm - 4687 days | #16 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Good to see Badandy back. He and Khan were the two who got me into external drives - for which I will be forever grateful. No more worries about viruses wiping out my collection. The one small drawback is the hoarding. That is why I continually look at all the stuff on my external drives. It's amazing the quality of material on there. The answer to Elephant's original question is "yes." That's why I continue to check out those drives. The tendency is to want to take out a new membership rather than view the hours already downloaded. Most of the time, I watch quite a lot of what I download, simply because it's a waste of money if I don't. It's also the reason I only join and review three or four sites a year. I do watch what I download. Despite that, there are still hours of material I have downloaded but not seen, and already I have the urge to join another site. For once I had an evening when I wasn't doing something, so I got the chance to view some of that material. That's what it's there for. Edited on Feb 22, 2012, 07:23pm | |
|
||
| 02-15-12 11:58am - 4694 days | #438 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Thanks Khan. My reviews are rare as an England victory (in anything), so it will take me the usual three months to get it sorted. Be nice to see England win before then. | |
|
||
| 02-15-12 11:08am - 4694 days | #436 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
"She's New" doesn't appear to be listed. It's an addition to the Team Skeet network. I've been thinking about maybe joining Team Skeet, especially as Exotics has it so high on his list. | |
|
||
| 01-25-12 03:43pm - 4715 days | #13 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Congrats to you too Capn. I missed your 1000th along with a lot of other stuff. I haven't been around much lately, barely time to check out PU or TBP, but good to see the regulars still around. | |
|
||
| 01-25-12 03:40pm - 4715 days | #11 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Congrats Denner, you're one of the most entertaining, honest, and outspoken on here. Couldn't believe my eyes, it's brilliant to see RB back. I thought he was gone for good. | |
|
||
| 01-18-12 06:15pm - 4722 days | #8 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Agree with all the above. It must take hours to get it all together so if Wittyguy has to shorten it a little this year, even a shortened version is better than no awards at all. It's a tradition. | |
|
||
| 01-01-12 09:08am - 4739 days | #6 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Thanks Khan and co. Happy New Year to you too, and all the PU regulars (and irregulars). | |
|
||
| 12-30-11 10:46am - 4741 days | #7 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Good to hear it Denner - excellent decision, I love that wolf. Capn I really like your avatar too, and any other that is idiosyncratic, personal and immediately distinguishes the member. | |
|
||
| 12-29-11 06:33pm - 4742 days | #3 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
It's just opinion but I hope you don't change it as I love the avatar. I like to see continuity, and avatars are like a recognisable face. I used to love Cybertoad's frog but he changed it. Toadsith's Patrick McGoohan is a classsic and I recognise the Drooler and Messmer posts the minute I see the avatars. Maybe I hate to see change. Oaky I hate to see change, I admit it. | |
|
||
| 12-25-11 05:43pm - 4746 days | #4 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
As above - Merry Christmas everyone and have a great 2012. | |
|
||
| 10-05-11 05:53pm - 4827 days | #5 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Excellent stuff so far. This could even win a PU Forum Award. | |
|
||
| 10-03-11 09:15am - 4829 days | #14 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Here's an idea (I already know the answer will be no, but this is merely for a little conversation) - how abou trust votes for a particular review rather than the reviewer. That way, if you don't trust the review, and think it's a little over the top one way or another, you can register your disapproval or approval. I realise the comments after the review are for that purpose, but to see the number of yes or no's at the top summed up, just as you do with trust votes for reviewers would be interesting. You would see at a glance what members think about the validity of the review. That way it doesn't get too personal. Okay, yes I know everything on TBP/PU is covered in minute detail, and we don't need any more stats, data, and numbers. Just a thought. | |
|
||
| 10-02-11 06:32am - 4830 days | #12 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Spot on as always graymane. Not only funny but very accurate. You're not Wittyguy's dad by any chance are you? | |
|
||
| 10-02-11 06:29am - 4830 days | #2 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Yes they do stick out like a sore thumb. It doesn't look like the same person doing all the reviews, but it does look fishy that there are five positive newbie reviews for an obscure site all at the same time. I have a feeling Khan has been looking at this one very closely. It does look to me as though the site has told people to come here and give positive reviews. Whether it goes further than that we don't know, but imo it makes the reviewed site look suspicious rather than a reputable good one. | |
|
||
| 09-28-11 12:24pm - 4834 days | #3 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Excellent post Micha, with some good ideas. I especially agree about navigability problems: Not much point having great porn if no one can find it. Also like the idea of TBP doing a beginners guide in one easy place. I second your feelings about the absurdity of Camel Toe too. Might as well use Frog Nostril, Dog Tail, or Ardvark Thigh. Edited on Sep 28, 2011, 12:27pm | |
|
||
| 09-27-11 06:02am - 4835 days | #2 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Great story gray one. If only there were owners and managers who considered good customer service to be good business, rather than regard them as the enemy to be ripped off, the world would be a better place. I am surprised there have not been some positive comments on this one. I know there would have been plenty of replies if it were a post concerning poor customer service and shady behaviour. Kudos to FigureBaby. | |
|
||
| 09-05-11 07:24pm - 4857 days | #33 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Agree with IK2 about WWW. Always good to see him make an appearance. Messmer, I don't blame your being concerned, however I do think taking a self imposed ban would make all the difference. I quite often have enforced breaks simply because I don't have the time to be around the computer, let alone watching porn. This keeps it all fresh for me. Simply watch normal tv. Occasionally you will see an attractive girl and that may well lead to your interest being stirred again. All the other things mentioned, could be contributing factors. | |
|
||
| 08-28-11 01:37pm - 4865 days | #20 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Very good news. Yesterday there were reports over here that the winds would be less than originally suggested. Those sort of natural occurrences scare the hell out of me. It's the reason I could never live in California. A disaster waiting to happen. Thankfully New York escaped with relatively minor damage today, and everyone was well prepared. Good to hear you're okay and back quickly, G. | |
|
||
| 08-04-11 06:36pm - 4889 days | #3 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
You have to laugh. Let's hope there's some common sense and they just give him a slap on the wrist and tell him not to do it again. | |
|
||
| 08-03-11 07:00pm - 4890 days | #3 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
This one's been around for about a year. It's everywhere, but if you want to buy it I haven't a clue where you would go. As you have noticed, there doesn't seem to be a Philly Butt Sluts official site. Maybe the clip is available, but it's quite strange that Philly Butt Sluts have a range of videos but no official site. They are not even available on the vidoebox or videosz dvd/videos download type of site. Just seen the above post - Brilliant find Pink. If you google Philly Butt Sluts like this (with spaces in the title ) you get no return but if you type phillybuttsluts like this (without spaces) you can find the site. Edited on Aug 03, 2011, 07:04pm | |
|
||
| 08-02-11 07:44am - 4891 days | #2 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Porn, although in many repsects is exceptional, is a microcosm of life in some respects. It's like acting or music, where a few make millions and the rest just make a living, or fail to make a living. That applies to other professions as well. As for career or life happiness and well being, my guess would be it's probably an unhappier profession than most, but it is truly an unhappy world out there. | |
|
||
| 08-02-11 07:37am - 4891 days | #3 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Bummer. You join a site to spend a few hours of uncomplicated fun, which you have worked hard for, then end up with a boatload of hassle. Since it's Epoch I would have guessed that it's some sort of minor accidental glitch. Very annoying though. I'm surprised at the Epoch "not accepting new members" theory. Good luck in your endavours not to get charged for something you haven't received. | |
|
||
| 07-31-11 04:01pm - 4893 days | #13 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Many congrats on 200. That's a lot of quality reviews. | |
|
||
| 07-26-11 05:31am - 4898 days | #10 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Congratulations on the ton, and a welcome contributor to these forums too. I know no one gets any points for posts but I think to be an accepted part of the community you have to contribute to the forum as well as doing the reviews. Both your reviews and posts are always entertaining and intelligent. | |
|
||
| 201-250 of 708 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Page 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 14 | 15 | Next Page > |
|
