|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
Tree Rodent (0)
|
| 401-450 of 708 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Page 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | Next Page > |
| 05-29-10 12:38pm - 5321 days | #8 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User  Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I just find condoms a turn off in porn, so wont join sites where they use them. | |
|
||
| 05-24-10 06:17pm - 5326 days | #21 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
They say you become more interested in the overall girl, and less explicit more erotic suff, the older you get. All I can say is I have always hated those gynaecological close ups from a very early age. Give me a view of the whole girl having sex and that's the best view for me. If it's softcore, then a view of the whole girl without any clothes. | |
|
||
| 05-22-10 05:21pm - 5328 days | #5 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I'm truly sorry to hear of their demise. They were a class act. The sad thing is they were brilliant at customer service and customer relations. So is the true model of success Videobox or ebay, where they don't give a shit about customers? Ebay is brilliant for cutting out all the costs of having customer service and spending it on publicity telling you what great service they have. Provide rude, ignorant, or non existent customer service, and it seems you will succeeed. It's a jaundiced view, and only partly true, but I feel a real sadness at the end of AV. WTF is wrong with people? They continue to join sites who have lousy customer service, then complain when their emails aren't answered. | |
|
||
| 05-20-10 05:59am - 5330 days | #6 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Poor Messmer, The good news is it's not really messmer at all. The gay aliens finally got to him. All of his conscious is buried deep under the evil alien influence, fighting a seemingly impossible battle to gain dominance of his physical shell. Next he'll be listening to acid house, saying things like "gimme a high 5" watching soap operas, declaring Pamela Anderson and Joan Collins the sexiest women in the world, and leading a crack Canadian mercenary squad to invade Guatemala. If he ever asks to phone home though don't let him. Mainly because home is now a small planet orbiting a binary star 106.5 light years away, meaning the charge will be $17,000,000,000,000, even at off peak cheap rate. | |
|
||
| 05-15-10 05:31pm - 5335 days | #12 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I am sure this is something I touched on last year or the year before. The big collectors can't possibly get around to seeing everything that is in their collection. As a hoarder myself I decided I had to be totally ruthless. It was Badandy and Khan who put me on to the external drive, which is so valuable. But I decided I must be honest. If I look at a downloaded clip and I am never going to watch it again, then it has to be deleted. There is the feeling about what am I going to do if suddenly porn gets a world wide ban for all time, then I will regret deleting stuff. I try to fight that. Mostly I download, watch, and then most of it I delete. I have still nearly filled one 250gb external drive though. I also have a backup with identical material on. Have one more 320gb which has a little space used. I basically agree with what everyone has says. It's the search for new stuff. Once you download it and have it you almost lose interest, because then you are looking for something else. That is very much the male mentality. I have been slow joining new sites, because there is no point joining, if you have just downloaded months of viewing from a site where you have been a member, and not watched it. If you're going to just store it and not watch it, you may as well not join in the first place. So I decide if I join a site it better be a site where I am going to genuinely want to watch the material, otherwise it's a waste of money. So I join the occasional one, download, watch, and delete, with the prime cuts going to storage. 90 per cent at least, gets deleted. 10 per cent is material that I consider to be exceptional, so I hate to part with it. Like Graymane I have a ton (literally) of old porn videos from the 80's ownwards. Just hate to get rid of them, even though I'll never watch them again. Strange the things you get sentimental about. Even though it is better quality generally to download, I have solved some hoarding problems by simply streaming a lot of stuff instead of downloading. But yes the act of just downloading stuff from sites is fun. Only those who do it can explain why it's fun. Seems silly but I know what you all mean. Edited on May 15, 2010, 05:37pm | |
|
||
| 05-11-10 07:52pm - 5339 days | #24 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I kind of knew you'd have all the obvious bases covered. Had a look but didn't see your comment about that site. Yeah I hate obtrusive watermarks myself. The search continues. | |
|
||
| 05-11-10 03:45pm - 5339 days | #22 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Messmer, have you checked out 40 Something Mag? It looks like some of the models start from fully clothed. Not exactly to your taste but is run by, perversely, the Score Group who do 18Eighteen and TNATryouts, and lots of 18 sort of stuff. But Wittyguy liked the 18Eighteen site in his review, and their photography looks good. In the previews some of the models started with clothed and there was some lingerie. Edited on May 11, 2010, 03:49pm | |
|
||
| 05-07-10 05:26am - 5343 days | #3 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Agree completely. I really hate all that crap and is the reason I have the sound turned down 99 per cent of the time. The minute I turn the sound on, it's the same irritating crap as described. I hate it, total turn off. It is the reason a lot of members here prefer pictures. | |
|
||
| 04-30-10 05:36pm - 5350 days | #6 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Sorry messmer, didn't mean to worry you - I know sweet FA when it comes to computers, I'm probably just being alarmist. I use AVG too, it is usually very good. | |
|
||
| 04-30-10 03:07pm - 5350 days | #2 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Could be a virus or some sort of spyware infection. I get very worried when I see one of those. In the past I have ended up having to have Windows reinstalled. It doesn't necessarily mean your computer has a virus but try and run some anti virus and anti spyware programmes. Could just be programmes that aren't functioning properly or maybe conflicting. | |
|
||
| 04-24-10 11:52am - 5356 days | #18 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I think religions tend to go with the theory, kill all the opposition in the name of god, then you'll have peace for all the righteous people. | |
|
||
| 04-22-10 12:56pm - 5358 days | #3 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I feel uncomfortable with these sort of people around me. Anyone who wants to kill someone because of something they say is, in my opinion, uncivilized. If this is racist, then I'm a racist, but Islam is a religion not a race. Religion is mainly 10 centuries behind what we regard as civilized behaviour. All I know is I do not want these people in my country. I am uncomfortable with them. Our governments invaded their countries over the years for the profit of big business and put the normal citizen at risk. It goes back centuries to where the Christians invaded, conquered, then killed all the survivors, not out of spite, but because they didn't have food to feed the prisoners. Governments are still as bad, but people have advanced, religion has not. It is still based around fear and ignorance. Edited on Apr 22, 2010, 02:59pm | |
|
||
| 04-22-10 05:55am - 5358 days | #27 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Thanks for the tip. Sounds as though you like all the sort of places I like. I remember Nanci Griffith saying that Oklahoma is most people's idea of what Texas is really like. Texas is nothing like people imagine it, but Oklahoma looks a lot like what people think Texas is like. I don't think she liked Oklahoma much. Just hope you didn't ever have the job of interviewing her. | |
|
||
| 04-21-10 01:00pm - 5359 days | #8 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Great thread and answers. Denner, the place just wouldn't be the same without you. I love Texas and Arizona too, and agree as you get older and time runs out you should use it in the way that makes you happy. Working hard until you drop just isn't a great way to spend your life, unless that's what you really want. | |
|
||
| 04-13-10 05:29am - 5367 days | #6 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Andy I understand your concern. I am one of those members. I have only ever given three negatives. They were all to the same bunch of people. 350z was one of them. I gave the negative with the comment that I trust them about as much as I trust an Enron executive. That's how I felt and still do. They moved in like a professional military operation (okay a little exagerration but it gets the point across). The review in question had a lot of description and no real negatives, apart from the "I can't get enough of this" sort of negative. It came in the wake of glowing reviews from other newbies and at the same time the webmaster turning up. They all moved in what looked like a carefully coordinated attack. I will stand up for Exotics because he made some very incisive observations and got attacked on a personal level for that. I thought he kept his cool considering the flaming personal attacks he was subjected to. I argued with him at length over fake breasts but it remained civilised. We may have disagreed that one time, but he doesn't get personal unless you get personal with him. Andy, I don't mind your comments. I understand your worries too. I would far prefer the few liners that some newbies dish out, to the shill/friend sort of reviews I saw from those members. Newbies can improve, because they are giving genuine reviews. These people only seemed to want to operate on this site, from within the framework of one particular site they were promoting. Everything seemed to revolve around promoting that one site. At least that's how I saw it. I consider my first three negatives were well deserved. I certainly would not want to chase away newbies and when I'm around will give them as much support as I can. I hope that alleviates your worries a little. I will try to be as friendly as possible. No I didn't trust them because they came to this site for one reason, and that was to promote one site. Looking at all the contributions they made it was obvious what they were doing. Andy, I certainly think if you want to say something though you should say it, and clearly you do. I have no problems with that at all. Even if you hadn't made the contributions you have, you still should say it. The same goes for anyone else. Edited on Apr 13, 2010, 05:40am | |
|
||
| 04-12-10 01:01pm - 5368 days | #12 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Yes. | |
|
||
| 04-11-10 07:36pm - 5369 days | #31 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Welcome to the forum. In all the chaos most of us didn't notice we had a new member. I'm happy because I'm now not the oldest one here. I can remember far back enough to when selling a mag with two people having sex, would get you two years in prison. Welcome and hope you like it here. | |
|
||
| 04-11-10 12:06pm - 5369 days | #2 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
It makes sense to have some sort of community effort to deal with these kind of attacks. One suggestion would be to let Raging Buddhist off his leash and set him on them. Meanwhile I'll have a nice cup of tea and some scones. I did make a suggestion about registering disapproval on one separate thread, but not contributing to their posts. I think we need some suggestions. You know, we never saw Wittyguy and Hybrid in the same place did we? No it couldn't be... | |
|
||
| 04-10-10 07:01pm - 5370 days | #53 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I was starting to think I'd miss them, but not if I get the sights on my gun checked out. Edited on Apr 10, 2010, 07:07pm | |
|
||
| 04-10-10 05:38pm - 5370 days | #49 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
They'd have been gone long ago if they didn't keep coming back to tell us they were leaving. | |
|
||
| 04-10-10 05:05pm - 5370 days | #2 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
That could be me posting that, but then I am usually quite angry myself. When I'm not angry I'm a "grumpy old man." Yes we should be angry for all the reasons you state, and because the bad guys rule and always will. Doesn't mean we have to like it. Exotics is just too far away to book an appointment. Someone told me the other day if I had an analyst he'd slit his wrists. It's okay to be angry, it means you're thinking about things. "If you're not cynical you're not paying attention," fits perfectly, because it's the truth. | |
|
||
| 04-10-10 04:12pm - 5370 days | #44 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
It was obvious what was happening from the start, but there wasn't a lot that could be done. We can choose to ignore or register our disapproval. Either way they get to publicise their site because by stirring things up they get more publicity. If the shills are ignored they just continue to post, and publicise their site without any opposition. It shows how this site can be hijacked and it can and will happen again. It seems like there is no way to stop it. Obviously Rick and Khan cannot or will not help, when the shills operate under the rules of this site. In this way poor sites can drum up some new customers because there are always suckers out there. Ripoff and bad companies everywhere tend to operate under the no publicity is bad publicity philosophy, so it's going to happen again soon. Maybe members will have ideas on how to at least minimise the impact an attack has on this site. It was good to see everyone deal with it to suit their own personality. The members showed their class enough to expose what we were dealing with. They showed their true colours and we showed ours. Edited on Apr 10, 2010, 04:16pm | |
|
||
| 04-10-10 10:25am - 5370 days | #29 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Given what has happened let me be the first to breathe a sigh of relief. I shall be very surprised if this lasts, but if it does, it will be very welcome in some quarters. I think this demonstrates how open the site is to attack. I didn't want to fan the flames but now I think is the time to draw up a plan to rescue PU from similar attacks. May I suggest no reply to any posts, negative trust votes, and a single thread or review where members can register their disapproval. They are some of my ideas. Other members may have better ones. I was caught between trying to keep quiet so as not to publicise that site any more, and registering my disgust and disapproval. Well done Denner, Exotics, Cap'n. Mbaya, RB (you certainly lived up to your name!), Panther, et al. Ed2009 you are the perfect example of a webmaster I would love to hear from more. Your posts have been tactful, intelligent, full of incite, and well expressed. You are the perfect ambassador for your site and industry. Edited on Apr 10, 2010, 10:30am | |
|
||
| 04-09-10 10:25am - 5371 days | #2 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Oh you summed it up perfectly Denner. I was not sure whether to say anything or keep quiet. I was worried that saying something gives even more publicity. I left two negatives recently. They were my first ever negative trust votes. I kept quiet until now, hoping something can be done about the situation. I suppose the one good thing is, it's not my site, it's Rick's and his associates. I am not sure whether they will do anything, whether they want to, or whether they can. I wondered whether I was being over concerned and a real anal retentive about things. It's good to see others are concerned too. FTR I have never left an anonymous negative. I speak my mind, but at the same time try to be fair, and not unkind. I consider those two were well deserved. | |
|
||
| 04-07-10 11:40am - 5373 days | #6 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Thank god you pulled yourself together in time. | |
|
||
| 04-07-10 11:27am - 5373 days | #4 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Anyone considering such a horrible use of money, should think again. I urge you, send it to me instead. I shall spend it on women drugs and alcohol. That way, not one cent will be wasted. | |
|
||
| 04-07-10 10:12am - 5373 days | #3 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I totally agree. It's time sites like this are hit hard with a big deduction in marks. Yes, it should be illegal, but even if it isn't, PU and TBP should be highlighting this at every opportunity. I think maybe the owners of PU and YBP have underrated the feelings of porn users when it comes to this sort of dishonesty. Edited on Apr 07, 2010, 10:22am | |
|
||
| 04-07-10 10:10am - 5373 days | #2 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Please god no! Don't do it messsmer. Not those sites. Anything but those sites. Tats and fake breasts. I'm not going near either of those places. | |
|
||
| 04-03-10 10:26am - 5377 days | #4 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Most people in porn, acting, music, media in general, are clearly complete assholes. The big difference is whether they are complete assholes to you personally. It's why it is best not to meet them. | |
|
||
| 04-02-10 07:47pm - 5378 days | #42 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Sorry to hear about yout cat Panther. Have always loved animals, and hated what some people do to them. She sounded like a lovely cat. The smiley's and animations get the thumbs up from me. I consider them fun. As for the boobies above. I find the real animal ones more attractive than the surgically mutilated plastic ones. Gannets are another favourite of mine. They are related to, and look similar to boobies. | |
|
||
| 03-31-10 09:17am - 5380 days | #22 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I've just seen a review by mbaya on British Tease. Maybe the site is not perfect for you, but it could be worth you taking a look at the review. | |
|
||
| 03-30-10 10:07am - 5381 days | #4 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Finally, something that explains why I am like I am. | |
|
||
| 03-30-10 09:55am - 5381 days | #2 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
It's something to concentrate on rather than focus on real issues such as illiteracy and health care shortfalls. Focus on anything that doesn't involve costing the rich or middle classes money, in the form of taxation to fix. Just pick on any easy target - gays, blacks, jews, women's rights, porn, liberals, whatever. Make them the focus of hate. It's easy to get stupid people to hate them, and their focus will be away from the social injustices. In fact blame them for the social injustices too. It's their fault. Simple. | |
|
||
| 03-30-10 09:43am - 5381 days | #4 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
It's the antivirus 2009 or 2010 which is very nasty. These two masquerade as your own antivirus software then tell you that you have a virus and your files are infected. The files they try to get you to delete are genuine files that you need. The virus stops you downloading any extra anti virus software or using the system restore. Like the other mentioned ones it then tries to get you to visit a site to buy some anti virus software, but doesn't let you visit any other sites. It's a killer. All you can do is wipe windows completely and start agin. You can get it on any website not just the adult ones. It's out there, is very nasty, and makes you afraid to visit any site. Once you have seen it you recognise it, but even if you spot it in the early stages I don't think there is much you can do. | |
|
||
| 03-29-10 04:58pm - 5382 days | #33 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I am quite proud to be an elitist scumbag, so I hope I can join the club. If elite means a bunch of porn fans who put together intelligent, well written reviews, and posts, for no ulterior motive other than fun, then yes, PU is elitist. Most people cannot write or talk in an intelligent way. Most cannot argue without getting angry. I once got angry and called Cybertoad a lawyer, but he forgave me. That was the way PU evolved. It could have evolved around 16 year old kids flaming one another every night with one line comebacks. PU just didn't evolve like that. But it keeps evolving and changing. You don't have to be old or intelligent to be a part. Everyone who joins and contributes without an ulterior motive I believe is made to feel welcome. Everyone new changes the character of the place a little, usually for the better. Maybe elitist just means not tolerant of poorly thought out reviews/posts, or deceptive reviews/posts. Any member who puts care and thought into their contributions helps add character and fun to the place, and I hope, is made to feel welcome | |
|
||
| 03-29-10 04:32pm - 5382 days | #48 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
TBP reviews have become irrelevant to me, I rarely read them. What I do check out are the tech aspects on TBP. TBP reviews look as though they are done by professionals in a professional way. They look at the site for a few hours then type out the review. The tech aspect of TBP is an ideal complement to the fan aspect of PU. I therefore think Spencer is right when he infers that TBP should stick to the technical aspect of sites. Some of us have made some suggstions, but I am not sure TBP is capable of handling much extra. Been thinking about the photos v videos thing. If it's a video site like American Vice or VideosZ the lack of pics are a negative, but you don't expect to see pics on a video site. You don't expect a white girl on an ebony site, or a MILF on a teen site. It's a negative in a way, but that's the drawback of overall marking. Should the site be marked only for living up to what it says it is? Trashman I think it was, who gave Naughty America 100 and Brazzers 98 purely for the reason they lived up to being exactly what they said they would be, and how they would appeal to a generic user. He reviewed 10,000 sites in 2 months, then disappeared off the face of the planet, never to be heard from again. Have to admit his reviews were very good though. Given that we on PU seem to be out of synch with what 99 per cent of the porn public is buying or wants, my advice to Rick would be this. Note down everything we say and then do exactly the opposite or risk financial ruin. For my part I have decided to still contribute despite my feelings about free material. I consider pirated and free material is linked to the health of not only TBP, but also porn users, free speech, porn producers, and freedom and health of the internet. I still believe in free speech but understand why there is censorship here. The place does need some rules and good management, especially in the light of the recent attacks. It would be easy for the place to be taken over by people with ulterior motives. I hope that never happens. I have also decided to be nice. This was never my strong point. So I intend to be much more positive in future. There has been too much negative stuff lately. Therefore I say well done to the owners, management, and bosses for getting most of it right most of the time. PS - I totally agree with the Drooler exclusive content comment. Edited on Mar 29, 2010, 05:20pm | |
|
||
| 03-28-10 10:01am - 5383 days | #26 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
My partner has threatened to cut off my foibles on more than one occasion. | |
|
||
| 03-28-10 10:00am - 5383 days | #24 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Sorry to waffle on again, but also there seems to be little allowance for sites that are part of a big network. If you subscribe to the site you get the whle network. The sites seemed to be marked individually. I think there should be some sort of distinction between network sites and stand alone sites, because there does not seem to be that at the moment. I know these replies by me are close to impossible to implement, even if Rick and co wanted to. So they are next to useless. Come on everyone where are you? More suggestions. FTR I think PU and TBP are head and shoulders above the opposition. It's as close to satisfying what most members want as it can get without badly disappointing anyone. It's impossible to satisfy everyone 100 per cent. These sites get as close as possible. | |
|
||
| 03-28-10 06:56am - 5383 days | #16 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
OOPS I meant PU reviews AND TBP reviews. For TBP to change means the PU marking system has to change. Wish we could start all over again but it's totally impractical. I know I have said this before too, and I do harp on about the same old thing, but Rick did ask the question. I even hesitated before bringing up that same point again. FTR I think TBP reviews are even worse than PU reviews especially with regard to ridiculously high marks. Okay I've said it. Burn the squirrel BURN THE SQUIRREL! | |
|
||
| 03-28-10 05:50am - 5383 days | #13 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I honestly think the biggest negative about PU reviews is the high overall mark, and think the whole system needs a total overhaul. 95 or whatever for VideoBox and middle 90's for some of the other sites is to me ridiculous. Most sites deserve about 10 less than they are awarded. To me, the marks awarded are totaly meaningless. Start all over again. LOL, no chance of that! | |
|
||
| 03-27-10 07:20pm - 5384 days | #25 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I used to be video only and really considered pictures as unimportant. I think it must be the influence of members here because I have now become more and more interetsed in the picture side of things. Now I like them almost equally, and consider it a big negative if a site doesn't have good pictures. | |
|
||
| 03-27-10 06:24pm - 5384 days | #25 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Denner, as long as you and the core members stick around there is no danger of the site going under or losing its heart. Rick and Khan are overseeing everything. Together the core people will keep the site on track. You are absolutely right about those devious attacks. That is almost exactly how I see it. The main thing is, that the decent ones manage to stick together and keep everything on track. | |
|
||
| 03-27-10 02:15pm - 5384 days | #6 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Sometimes it's hard to define what a site is like. Sites with girls you have seen a hundred times, with fake breasts, tattoos, and poor camerawork almost seem to end up with the same marks as a site with great looking newcomers, and original ideas. It's hard to explain it, but I'd like to see some sort of attempt at describing the sort of site you are signing up to. Some sort of way of knowing what the subjective experience of the site is like. Okay, I'm not describing it very well. | |
|
||
| 03-27-10 11:38am - 5384 days | #2 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Bugger it, that means I'm going to have to be nice. First thoughts are there is too much emphasis on quantity rather than quality. I don't just mean picture quality, I mean the care it takes to shoot scenes, the camerawork and how they make the girls look. Those things like bad camerawork where all you get to see is two groins, or the guy's ass or continually looking at the guy's face rarely seem to be taken into account. When sites do that sort of thing it's quite often symptomatic across the whole site. Not enough, in fact hardly any emphasis seems to be on genuine customer service. Too many of the older sites seem to be getting the same marks, and producing fewer updates, or updates which are really recycled old stuff. Not enough emphasis on trickery - for instance the porn.com thing where you get the pre ticked box on the cancellation page, which signs you up to the same site under a different name, only you pay four times the amount for the same material that you are trying to cancel. That sort of stuff. Genuine trickery. Smaller or newer sites don't seem to get much publicity, and maybe there should be a way of marking an individual site with an individual style in a way that gives it a chance to grow. How about an ebay customer feedback type of thing? I know that is what PU is for but maybe just a quick consumer mark for various qualities or lack of them, without the big review or overall score. Edited on Mar 27, 2010, 11:49am | |
|
||
| 03-25-10 07:21pm - 5386 days | #33 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
DOH! Quick go back and edit your post. On the other hand I think you are right. What happens is you get the occasional bunch of shills or wind up artists, but the forum ethos doesn't change because the core of very different people wont let it change. No matter what happens, they will hang on to civility and intelligent argument. It would take an awful lot to change that because the core here will not let that happen. That includes 2nd wave members like myself and Ik2fireone, and newer members like Capn. New blood is joining all the time and these new members have that same belief in how members should behave. | |
|
||
| 03-25-10 03:53pm - 5386 days | #4 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Great post Wittyguy. I agree wholeheartedly. For me one of the most inciteful comments about PU, came last year from BadAndy. It was concerning why the people here give each other respect and do not flame one another over disagreements. It's because we are all old enough and/or intelligent enough to have come to terms with the fact that we like porn. (Hope I havent misrepresented you there Andy). It has been commented on before but I find this one of the most intelligent and enjoyable forums I have contributed to. I always looked in even when I was not contributing. This place will always be one of the first sites I visit even when I am not contributing. I understand Rick and Khan's position over the free stuff/freedom of speech thing that I was worried about. I am still in the free speech corner but understand their reasons and worries concerning free material. Basically, this place is too good, enjoyable, and valuable, for me to want it to fail. Therefore I should make occasional contributions. | |
|
||
| 03-25-10 11:23am - 5386 days | #13 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I quite like Hyundai. The company gets the condemnation of Clarkson and co. but I love their cars. Their small small compact cars are really economical and reliable. Edited on Mar 25, 2010, 11:41am | |
|
||
| 03-24-10 04:27pm - 5387 days | #3 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
AssTeenMouth has a lot of anal and is part of the TeenCoreClub network. It has lots of anal across the whole network but is very expensive relative to others. Sorry, but there's no story line involved on these sties. | |
|
||
| 03-24-10 03:43pm - 5387 days | #38 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I really think webmasters should be lmited to the amount of posts per month. Most are great and don't contribute enough. Others abuse the system. I hope Rick and Khan can do something about the current situation. Edited on Mar 24, 2010, 03:49pm | |
|
||
| 03-24-10 08:12am - 5387 days | #5 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I am starting to think we are all the exceptions on here. 99.5 per cent of porn lovers are completely different and we are the ones who have tastes that no one caters for. It's as though we are standing on the shore trying to hold back the tide, because no matter what we say, that same old shit seems to sell. The more of the actions you have just described, I see, the more it annoys me, yet there is nothing any of us can do about it. It's like trying to get a French classic film that isn't dubbed on prime time televison. It's like poor old Messmer's simple wants - a site with middle aged women, wearing just normal clothes or some simple lingerie, stripping down to naked. Sounds sipmle, just like trying to get a b/g scene where the male doesn't slap the girl's ass. The more I see it, the more I take notice of it, and the more it annoys me. Have to agree with JD though. American porn is far worse for this | |
|
||
| 401-450 of 708 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Page 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | Next Page > |
|
