| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Lesbian Foot Lover
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
I would say, describe the facts about what the trial membership provides, though leave it up to others to make up their minds on the site.
I would look at your story and say, good thing they offered the trial and you are out only 3 euros and not 30. Sounds like a very crappy trial for sure, but was it really a scam?
|
07-14-10 12:18pm
|
Reply
127
|
Lesbian Foot Lover
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
Most trials are limited access, that should be expected.
|
07-14-10 08:48am
|
Reply
128
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Porn industry is larger in the U.S. versus Europe, which gives the photographers the wider range of girls who are entering the adult business.
|
07-13-10 03:05pm
|
Reply
129
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
Darrow's Review
I've been curious about the extremely vague join options, and how the site actually works. Their joining options are completely different now than the last time I looked at it. Are you capable of providing any more details?
I like an occasional scene from them, what would that be, $7.50 per individual scene? That's actually not all that bad considering the going rate for fetish clips elsewhere is still $1/minute. Course everyone likes cheaper, but in the grand scheme of things...
|
07-13-10 09:01am
|
Reply
130
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
Private Collection = European girls
Hometown Amateurs = American girls
|
07-11-10 09:57pm
|
Review
131
|
Triple BBB
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-very unique content
-very creative photography
-great acting by the girls
-new videos are encoded in crisp 720p 4mbps format |
| Cons: |
-scene videos are split up in multiple downloads
-preview tour is very lacking in details
-updates come a tad slowly |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a fetish site, focus on clothing, boots, gloves, a setting, and bondage themed. All-girl site starring various British & Czech models, most scenes star two girls at a time, some three.
There are just over 100 scenes currently available. Each scene is different, generally the older scenes are 6 minutes of video & 100 images. The newer scenes are between 15-20min & 200-250 images. Very small watermark on the images, and watermark on the first 5 seconds of each video then nothing after. No drm, no bandwidth limit, zip files for the imagesets
The scenes are done up in various settings, one might be the Star Trek bridge, another a secretary's office, city rooftop, military camp, garage shop, and more.
Everything is bondage themed, it's what the site owner terms "glamour bondage", where it is done really without a sense of pain or domination. Often I get the sense they are genuinely having fun acting in the scenes! Most scenes are done with toys or a strap-on.
Downsides first the tour is very brief. I think the site owner is extra cautious about images of the girls he uses, in bondage, open to the world to freely see which is why it's rather short. Take it as it is. You see shots of the previous two weeks updates & some of the coming two weeks of updates.
The update rate is on the slow side. 4 updates per week. Each scene is divided into total of 12 or 16 parts which releases one per week, do the math, each scene takes from 3 to 4 months from initial release until completion. I like the site a lot, and I join for a month at a time, twice or three times per year. Even the first month at the site you have the archive of over 100 scenes to check out.
The video of each scene is split up into segments, though the owner is getting better with the newest updates with grouping the parts together into a continuous video file as each part is released.
So the updates come in slow, though on the flip side the new updates then are still very fresh to watch through. In the end it is a fetish site, and what they focus on I think they do a very good job. But if this style happens not to be your style, then that is fine too. |
|
07-09-10 05:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
132
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
They still do good work when they put out an original new scene, and if you know their numbering scheme you can tell what is what - for instance tomorrow's update with Aneta is a brand new original production. But ummm, I think they never really regained focus ever since they realized they could not continue pushing out two brand new scenes each day on 1by-day.
DDF seems to be putting most of their effort in their EveAngelOfficial site.
|
07-05-10 10:23am
|
Reply
133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Would call up the credit card company and report the charge as fraudulent first.
CCBill / epoch / vxsbill they are reputable never a problem ever - if I want something from a site that uses any other billing method I check all reviews I can, and if they all check out fine I make damn sure to use a virtual credit card number and cancel that number immediately after - this way no matter if they want to screw me with a rebill or not they cannot charge me again for anything.
|
06-30-10 09:07pm
|
Reply
134
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Here are their official preview galleries for this site, check it out for yourself:
http://www.goldinaraw.com/?p=1
|
06-29-10 02:28pm
|
Reply
135
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Yes'em, currently. Not sure what precisely you prefer - most of the photosets focus more on slowly taking off clothes. It's definitely not a site that focuses on full nudity nor closeups of the naughty bits.
I don't know, every photoset is different, some the girl is full nude from the start, and others the girl still has some article of clothing still on at the end.
Just two quirks with the site, there is a wealth of back-material, the new updates come about 7 or 8 per month but they are for some reason are bunched up so updates come quicker near the end of each calendar month and scarcer at the beginnings. Then, the preview image of what the next update will be, often it turns out to be a different set released - the preview will eventually be released, just not always the next one out.
|
06-29-10 02:20pm
|
Reply
136
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
yote78's Reply
I never understood what their grand plan was with their dozens of websites...
All content on magicblondes, flexypussy, dirty101, it all is doubled on either pix & video or club sandy. Everything.
Cuties Galore is a whole separate site from the rest, focusing on Russian girls, and their content is *not* found on pix & video or club sandy.
|
06-28-10 04:30pm
|
Reply
137
|
Lezboland
(0)
|
Reply of
Sevrin's Comment
They state that price in their tour, but as far as I'm aware it's never actually offered when joining.
This site purchases videos every now & then from standard content producers, many of the videos are found on other sites as teendreams, teenpinkvideos, mysexykittens. At least lezboland has better encoding that the others, 640x480@4mbps with no watermark.
|
06-28-10 04:25pm
|
Reply
138
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
My take is that Brazzers truly is sleazy, while 21Sextury created a complex network of sites far too large for them to effectively handle. Both situations suck, but I don't get the impression those who run 21Sextury wake up each morning and think of new possibilities on how to screw us over. I could be wrong, who knows?
|
06-27-10 04:05pm
|
Reply
139
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
There is still a very significant difference between 21Sextury & Brazzers, in that Brazzers is shitty by (1) operating many piracy & tube websites, and (2) screwing subscribers over with unwanted up-sells. While I'm not excusing 21Sextury, inconsistent updates just is not in the same league as Brazzers.
|
06-27-10 01:03pm
|
Reply
140
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Depends on the content. If the site produces the best content out there, then what the fuck do I care if they make a few extra bucks with ads? More money in their hands is more that could go towards new material.
But if the site's content sucks ass, then the ads piss me off.
Suppose I'm saying content is king, ads who cares?
|
06-24-10 06:45pm
|
Reply
141
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I did not say it is perfectly reasonable not to get access to a site for days.
What I say is it is not reasonable to condemn a site for being down for a day.
|
06-18-10 10:59am
|
Reply
142
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Then ask the billing company for a refund and drop the dramatics.
Every site has hosting issues at some point in their life, and your sensationalized comment gives very little of actual value except just to add another negative mark on some site.
How am I able to determine whether they deserve the negative mark, or if you are just an incredibly impatient surfer? Was the site down for just one day? Two? A week? Intermittently? Were you denied a refund?
|
06-18-10 12:46am
|
Reply
143
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Give it a few days, see if the site comes back. If not, contact the billing company for a refund.
|
06-17-10 08:50pm
|
Comment
144
|
Seventeen Video
(0)
|
|
06-12-10 06:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
145
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
You know, sometimes there are server issues that cannot be maintained to 100% perfection 100% of the time
|
06-11-10 09:11pm
|
Reply
146
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
laxteen's Reply
The video from the main tour page:
http://www.teenmodels.com/home/
Like one I noticed in there is a video of Eufrat with a baseball bat that is not yet available in the members area.
|
06-10-10 05:05pm
|
Reply
147
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
yote78's Comment
I've not seen the trailers, but know they do show in the preview pages the cover-image of every photoset available, and a preview of every video available. Plus a smaller preview of the full month ahead of updates. I cannot name any other site that freely provides this much information of what's inside.
If the main trailer has something not available, that is unfortunate, but I don't think Teen Models can legitimately be accused of "bait-and-switch".
|
06-10-10 10:58am
|
Reply
148
|
Desk Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
http://img232.imagevenue.com/img.php?ima..._new_4_123_360lo.jpg
http://img265.imagevenue.com/img.php?ima..._new_2_123_101lo.jpg
They do some stripping like on virtuagirl, though they focus more of the scenes on more explicit things. This is not a separate site, you have a virtuagirl account, just log in to desk babes using the same information, download that software and install it. It will replace the virtuagirl version you currently have with the update that handles both, as you can see in the screenshot I took (bet you can't guess who my fav girl is).
There is no subscription to desk babes currently, it's all credit based, but as you have just one account, if you have credits for VirtuaGirl you can use them for desk babes, and vice versa.
The only change I see for users is, once Desk Babes is installed I only receive the daily demo cards for desk babes and not virtuagirl anymore. I never watch the demos anyways so it's not something I care about. But anyways, yeah the software is free and the demos are free, just log in and check it out.
|
05-24-10 09:45pm
|
Reply
149
|
Desk Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
It's not just girl/girl scenes, there are solos too, the emphasis is on more explicit action, kissing, fingering, toying.
The original is good with the strips, and this addition is good too for what it is.
What is a waste to one is often amazing to another.
|
05-24-10 08:07pm
|
Reply
150
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
1By-Day still gives you 3 fresh exclusive scenes every week, plus 3 non-exclusive purchased scenes (first time they've ever appeared on DDF). Hot Legs & Feet still gives 2 fresh exclusive scenes every week.
Half on Only Blowjob's scenes are fresh exclusive scenes.
Then it's all the other sites where the bulk of the remastered/recycled/purchased content sits.
And if you are curious at all about a particular scene, just save off any one of the images then look at its detail properties they all have the "date picture taken" field filled in.
|
05-20-10 09:31pm
|
