Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1051
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I have to admit, despite the decent subscription deal I am on, I am finding very little of late worthy of being saved.
Cap'n. :0(
|
06-03-11 06:52pm
|
Reply
1052
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only site subscriptions.
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-01-11 03:07pm
|
Reply
1053
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Well, that is a good reason for us not giving them our money .
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-30-11 09:04am
|
Reply
1054
|
Only Opaques
(0)
|
Reply of
tjsully's Comment
Another example of what a venerable friend of mine once said of the Only Tease site:
'All sizzle & no steak!'
I am afraid it still holds true now.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-24-11 09:22am
|
Reply
1055
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Review
I think the recent revamp is a success. I especially like the new comments feature.
Still looking & waiting for those user defined customisable zips though! ;0)
As regards photography, I think Sean Rs work is over rated.
He does what he does well, but his sets are far too repetetive
with a lot of identical poses which could easily be edited out without loss to the set content.
A personal thing, but for me he spends too long on the rear views & gynaecology & not enough full body shots.
A fair review of a solid site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-24-11 09:18am
|
Reply
1056
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It really depends on whether her breasts are on view or not.
If they are I can usually tell quite easily.
Clothed it is tricky.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-24-11 09:10am
|
Reply
1057
|
Bikini Dream
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
Sounds like you are having a frustrating time with this one.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-23-11 03:51pm
|
Reply
1058
|
Massage Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think the main problem with all networked sites, to a greater or lesser extent is the blunderbuss approach.
Fire shots covering all niches & hope that some hit.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-23-11 03:50pm
|
Reply
1059
|
Hot 60 Club
(0)
|
Reply of
hawkfan050's Review
A very decent first tilt at a review.
Try and include more stats & that will improve the value of it.
Welcome on board, & thanks for flagging up a site I didn't know existed.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-23-11 03:42pm
|
Reply
1060
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As I am not really a fan of videos, I am not particularly bothered one way or another. Marginally I quite like them, but only as a change from other styles.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-23-11 03:39pm
|
Reply
1061
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
Downloads only here.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-20-11 06:01am
|
Comment
1062
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
|
05-17-11 11:14am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1063
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
TBH it is not overly a concern of mine, as mainstream porn is more than catered for.
If someone feels their niche is being neglected, it is up to them to speak up.
Cap'n.
|
05-16-11 09:08am
|
Reply
1064
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm sure it isn't just you.
I know I am late on this, but comparing recent reviews on this & a couple of goes around the public area, I am more inclined to agree with you, M.
It seems to be struggling for an identity.
Too many artsy pretentious sets for me by the look.
Just stick to one formula & refine it.
Too many flaws in too many areas.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-15-11 04:38am
|
Reply
1065
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I have to agree with you on this one.
It is an unique site.
The models, costumes, photography & effects are first rate. Navigation is a little flaky IIRC, which detracts from the 'story' element somewhat.
As you quite rightly point out though, it is really a photography, not video site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-15-11 04:27am
|
Reply
1066
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
That is regional pricing.
A CCBill 'service.'
Cap'n. :oE
|
05-15-11 04:21am
|
Reply
1067
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Surely anything more than 2 can be considered a gang?
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-15-11 04:13am
|
Reply
1068
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not very often, as my tastes seem to differ substantially from most TBP reviewers.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-12-11 02:13pm
|
Reply
1069
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
fredv's Review
A fine start! Welcome.
I can agree with your point of view on this one.
Formula is fine, but with this quantity it really needs more variation for any model or photographer to stand out.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-10-11 11:19am
|
Reply
1070
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I never bother with them if they have that.
It is a clue as to how they view their customers.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-10-11 11:15am
|
Reply
1071
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I suppose they regard that as the 'Art' part! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-10-11 11:13am
|
Reply
1072
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
It doesn't make any difference to me either way, I'm afraid.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-09-11 11:12am
|
Reply
1073
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I wouldn't put them a favourite, but they can be OK on occasion. Cap'n. :0)
|
05-04-11 08:59am
|
Reply
1074
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I don't fit into social networks, let alone PU!
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-02-11 04:27am
|
Reply
1075
|
Live Jasmin
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
I get pop ups from that site whenever I visit a certain forum (not this one ;0) ).
That alone is enough to put me off.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-01-11 11:33am
|