| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
It does, for now. It seems to have hindered the 'shills' pretty well, as long as they don't find some another loophole.
|
08-24-07 05:35pm
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Linux :)
|
08-07-07 08:21pm
|
Reply
103
|
Russian Mistress
(0)
|
Reply of
djwolf's Comment
Look at the "Site Facts" section on TBP listing.
"First Listed: 05-17-05"
Added in 05, no updates since. The trial may have been available in 05, but not now. Limited time offer apparently.
If you are willing to join and give us a review...
:)
|
05-31-07 08:46am
|
Reply
104
|
Kat Young
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Reply
Most sites that do this I see no problem with it, but "I'm 21 ... and live near X" is false advertising. I am pretty sure the owners of the site could be taken to court over that.
|
05-31-07 08:42am
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Definitely Abby Winters. Best overall value. Amateur content everywhere (even though the site does not seem like it), and many search/nav functions and a great design.
I have had memberships to all of the sites listed, but AW is the best.
VideoBox is nice in that you get hundreds of DVDs to download, but have a taste for more amateur/exotic stuff.
Hegre Art is nice, has beautiful models, but is mostly all images.
I would probably like it better if they had longer/more videos.
Matts Models is a nice site but lacks in a few areas. Also, the design does not appeal to me.
FTV Girls I love. The videos are awesome and so is the site, but then again it still seems too professional in style to me. If they didn't priss the girls up so much and use some fancy house so much it would appeal more.
|
05-31-07 08:33am
|
Reply
106
|
Kat Young
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
It's not that creepy. Any tracking software can narrow down to whatever the closest city is to you. When you connect to your ISP for internet, it assigns you an IP address and most give you a hostname. An example hostname: someisp.miami.fl.730.304.23.234
Usually your ISP name (sometimes shortened along with a location and your IP address are given). Pretty much any advertising company can associate hostnames with locations. I think mostly through masking. E.G. Filter anywone with 'miami' and/or 'fl' as being in Miami, Florida.
P.S. I am not too sure what your post has to do with this site in particular. Many models have setups now where they hold up a blank piece of paper and anyones city name can be printed on it by the server.
|
05-24-07 12:47pm
|
Reply
107
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom22's Comment
I agree. While I admire a site's willingness to prevent stealing/pirating of their videos, things like massive logos and DRM on their members content is really unacceptable.
A small logo that doesn't cover much, and is possibly semi-transparent is ok though.
|
05-13-07 08:26am
|
Reply
108
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Bo M's Review
I am always skeptical of a 100% rating. Not to mention that it would be nice if you followed the review guidelines. You should put your points for and against (pros and cons) in complete sentence with a dash before each sentence to better show each point. Also, "This chick is SO GREAT!!!" is an opinion that should have been thrown in the bottom line along with the explanations of your pros/cons. For instance, your pros focus only on her abilities, and the bottom line only focuses on updates. Here is an example to make it cleaner, just for future reference:
PROS:
- Great skills!
- Does great deepthroat blowjobs!
- A is what I like about site navigation. (EXAMPLE)
- The site as great video quality (900kb/s WMV/MPG/AVI). (EXAMPLE)
- Images are high-res (1600px+) (EXAMPLE)
CONS:
- Needs better navigation
BOTTOM LINE:
This chick is SO GREAT !!! Her skills in pleasing her man is like a dream and her soft body is really wonderful to watch. I especially love the way she gives head and how she deepthroats and keep the dick deep down her throat extremely long and makes me get nutts when imagining myself being treated by her.
Every minute with her must be really terrific !! She always keep her site very fresh and up-to-date. Maybe that is why it is a bit difficult to remember what you have checked or not. But the site is wonderful !!
You should also expand on the pros and cons in the bottom line, your entire review seems to focus on the model for the most part and barely states anything about the site beyond updates and a catch line to join a site that you did not explain very well.
Just for future reference, and to help out the others on the site. :)
|
05-13-07 08:18am
|
Comment
109
|
Justine Joli
(0)
|
|
05-11-07 05:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
Good idea! I would typically say it is a bad action to take if it weren't for the fact that you can browse back and answer previous polls! Since you can do this, it really defeats the purpose of updating the poll every day since any you miss you can go back and answer later. I'm sure you guys would have trouble getting a new question every day for all eternity anyway... :)
|
05-11-07 05:41pm
|
Reply
111
|
Ema's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
djwolf's Comment
I am skeptical not only because it is 100% rating but because it is a new site and has not had a chance to collect members yet. I will wait with this for a while to see what others say if more join.
|
05-10-07 02:15pm
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I love the new enhancements, except for one thing: I have seen people get rated bad with no reason why. People I would really put a good trust rating to many anonymously rate bad here and there with no comment. I think you should require a comment of X length (maybe 50 characters?) be attached when rating someone badly.
|
05-08-07 04:02pm
|
Reply
113
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Drooler, I agree. It is a ripoff. I was rather shocked seeing the 'UPDATED WEEKLY' banner on the site, but when I joined the 'updates' section shows no new updates since January 2006. That is false advertising for one thing, so they should have removed that banner if they still wanted to offer old content.
My guess is they packed up shop and left. If I could, I would get my money back as it is probably just sitting in an account somewhere.
Personally, as I said, I wouldn't join unless you just want to try to grab the old videos. They seem pretty popular elsewhere.
|
05-05-07 11:44am
|
Reply
114
|
Spring Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
marquis58401's Comment
I have heard that too, but I am pretty sure it is a rumor... and not true. I have seen the site in the past, and the tour on her front page still seems to add new content here and there. I will keep track on this for a while to see if it is still true.
|
05-05-07 09:31am
|
Comment
115
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
|
05-05-07 09:25am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I keep in mind that they might be biased, but then again if a site is really bad (or really good) it has merit. I try to sort through ones that don't appear legit.
|
05-05-07 01:18am
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Can't afford the bandwidth? Use P2P technology. It works. I think at this point ALL video should be at least full-screen TV quality MINIMUM. Sites that don't have this, I don't stay. DRM? No, just... no.
|
05-05-07 01:14am
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I am not into the matures as much, but there are many out there that are hot. I know a lot of people fantasize about that hot friend's mom.
|
05-05-07 01:12am
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Totem (mainly), Mplayer, or VLC. I use Linux. Period.
|
05-05-07 01:10am
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Not a huge deal to me and even though I advocate safe-sex; I still prefer no condom for the creampies and I think it brings on this suspenseful "Is he ganna do it?" feeling (especially in homemade/amateur content).
|
05-05-07 01:09am
|
Reply
121
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Planning on switching to Cable. Would grab fiber the moment it gets here (if it ever gets here... listening AT&T???).
|
05-05-07 01:05am
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Don't have a portable device to watch it on.
|
05-05-07 01:04am
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If the site is reliable, I love to hear about updates to the site or content.
|
05-05-07 01:04am
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Firefox, best Linux browser. Before I switched to Linux, and before Firefox... if you are going use IE, I recommend Maxthon. It takes IE and adds Firefox-like plugins, interface, and tabs!
|
05-05-07 01:02am
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
WMV does not work well on linux. I prefer Xvid/Divx due to great quality for filesize, but will take quicktime or MPEG as well. Flash needs updated to compete. Will Silverlight bring that change?
|
05-05-07 01:01am
|
