| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
Good idea! I would typically say it is a bad action to take if it weren't for the fact that you can browse back and answer previous polls! Since you can do this, it really defeats the purpose of updating the poll every day since any you miss you can go back and answer later. I'm sure you guys would have trouble getting a new question every day for all eternity anyway... :)
|
05-11-07 05:41pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I love the new enhancements, except for one thing: I have seen people get rated bad with no reason why. People I would really put a good trust rating to many anonymously rate bad here and there with no comment. I think you should require a comment of X length (maybe 50 characters?) be attached when rating someone badly.
|
05-08-07 04:02pm
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I keep in mind that they might be biased, but then again if a site is really bad (or really good) it has merit. I try to sort through ones that don't appear legit.
|
05-05-07 01:18am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Can't afford the bandwidth? Use P2P technology. It works. I think at this point ALL video should be at least full-screen TV quality MINIMUM. Sites that don't have this, I don't stay. DRM? No, just... no.
|
05-05-07 01:14am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I am not into the matures as much, but there are many out there that are hot. I know a lot of people fantasize about that hot friend's mom.
|
05-05-07 01:12am
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Totem (mainly), Mplayer, or VLC. I use Linux. Period.
|
05-05-07 01:10am
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Not a huge deal to me and even though I advocate safe-sex; I still prefer no condom for the creampies and I think it brings on this suspenseful "Is he ganna do it?" feeling (especially in homemade/amateur content).
|
05-05-07 01:09am
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Planning on switching to Cable. Would grab fiber the moment it gets here (if it ever gets here... listening AT&T???).
|
05-05-07 01:05am
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Don't have a portable device to watch it on.
|
05-05-07 01:04am
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If the site is reliable, I love to hear about updates to the site or content.
|
05-05-07 01:04am
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Firefox, best Linux browser. Before I switched to Linux, and before Firefox... if you are going use IE, I recommend Maxthon. It takes IE and adds Firefox-like plugins, interface, and tabs!
|
05-05-07 01:02am
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
WMV does not work well on linux. I prefer Xvid/Divx due to great quality for filesize, but will take quicktime or MPEG as well. Flash needs updated to compete. Will Silverlight bring that change?
|
05-05-07 01:01am
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Usually take a few days and look at similar offerings and completion to choose best offer.
|
05-05-07 12:57am
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It is VERY important to me. I would like to know at least about how often updates occur and that updates ARE occurring.
|
05-05-07 12:55am
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Lack of showing when updates occurred tips me off. At this point, if I can't see updates I have no reason to believe the site is even being updated.
|
05-05-07 12:47am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Its a classic way to increase traffic / interaction, but I have a feeling some will be reviewing sites whether they were a member or not just to get the points and tickets for the chance to win.
Although the 'trust rating' could help offset this, I would have liked it better if you charged per-review to get a ticket ($1 to enter?) just to further prevent false reviews.
|
05-05-07 12:44am
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
Reply of
peepee's Poll
Huge girl-gasm!
|
05-05-07 12:40am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Don't mind any of them, but lettin it go inside is the best!
|
05-05-07 12:38am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Don't care much for fully shaved. Don't mind the hair (any amount), but at least kept neat.
|
05-05-07 12:35am
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Lack of updates, quality of content, and amount of content (based on age of site) determine if I keep a membership.
One of my major dropping points: video. Quality should be at least full-screen TV quality at this point. Can't afford the bandwidth? Adopt P2P.
|
05-05-07 12:11am
|
Rating
96
|
abbywinters
(0)
98.0
|
No Review.
|
03-31-07 08:30pm
|
Comment
97
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
|
03-31-07 08:28pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
98
|
All Hairy
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Exclusive content
- Medium ammount of content
- User-submission image board
- Non-professional models
- Model directory |
| Cons: |
- Some content not exclusive
- Some videos can only be downloaded in chunks
- Video quality varies
- Image size varies
- Not much user-submitted content |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has a fair amount of content, but could use more. The models are typically average-looking, but some are not exclusive to the site. The only videos/models I can clearly say are exclusive are the few that where an "All Hairy" shirt in the beginning.
The site design isn't bad, but could use some better search features and model information. It includes a model directory sorted by name alphabetically.
The user-submission gallery is a good idea, but there is not a whole lot there and some of it is copied from some other copyrighted site (with watermarks removed), but some looks original.
The video quality varies with many of them showing in a small box on top of a 740x480 black box. The videos, for the most part, can be downloaded in chunks or as a whole. Some videos are WMV (newer videos), older are MPEG.
Images are typically medium sized and good quality (~800-1000px) with very few being massive (2000px+).
If you like hairy girls and want to try out your hand at submitting your own or just viewing what few others have posted and seeing some hairy girls have sex or play with themselves, then go for it. If you are looking for the more erotic aspect of hair, there are better sites out there. |
|
05-05-07 11:33am
Replies (1)
|
Rating
99
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
83.0
|
No Review.
|
08-31-07 10:23am
|
Reply
100
|
Brooke Skye
(0)
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Comment
If you could, please clarify your answer. Nothing has changed in term of design or no new content has been added?
|
03-26-09 08:09am
|
