| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I'm surprised at your comment in the cons that the scenes are not dated and you don't know if they're updating. One only has to look at the site tour to see that they are updating once a week on a wednesday and the network as a whole 15 times a month, exactly the same as it was last year when I had a membership and reviewed it.
This latest batch of reviews seem rushed, much shorter than your usual and way below the standards we've come to expect from you.
|
11-28-20 02:40am
|
Reply
27
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
Supervert's Reply
That's good to hear, CCBill are usually pretty good in that respect. I hadn't realised Pretty Parisiennes was still an active site, in fact I thought it had closed down at one point. I've not been a member there since 2011. It would be great to see an up to date review if the site comes back online.
|
11-25-20 01:03am
|
Reply
28
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
Supervert's Comment
I see the site is still down a week later, disgusting really if you have a paid for membership. You should ask the billing company for a refund if you haven't already done so.
|
11-24-20 08:07am
|
Reply
29
|
Nubiles Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thanks for the advice and for taking the time to reply. I guess when I sign up I'll do it via Nubiles.net just to be certain I get that site as it's the main site of interest. Probably be next month now as just signed up to Penthouse 3 or 4 days ago. Hopefully there will be some good deals around next month in the run up to Christmas.
|
11-24-20 12:52am
|
Reply
30
|
Nubiles Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Are you sure this is not just some special deal or promotion you had when you signed up? If Nubiles.net is the crown jewel in the Nubiles Porn network you would think that they would promote it on their tour pages.
When I visit the Nubiles.net site seperately there's also no mention of having access to any other network sites, it just looks like a standalone site to me. It's been 4 or 5 years since I last joined Nubiles.net so I'm getting the urge to join again. Last time I joined Nubiles.net I didn't have access to any of the bonus sites despite the fact they were listed in a drop down menu.
|
11-23-20 09:47am
|
Reply
31
|
Nubiles Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
When I visit the site I don't see any mention of Nubiles.net being included in the deal.
|
11-23-20 08:47am
|
Comment
32
|
Penthouse Gold
(0)
|
|
11-20-20 03:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
33
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Trump2020's Comment
That's exactly the same problem I've just found with Watch 4 Beauty, they have these fucking enormous 8688 pixel photos and super high quality 4k videos and design a site to be viewed on a 6 inch fucking mobile screen. Words fail me.
|
11-16-20 03:21pm
|
Review
34
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Choice of billers CCBill or Paypal through Epoch (depending whose referral link you use).
Site online since 2005.
High quality exclusive photo and video content.
Photo resolution up to 5792 x 8688 with zip downloads.
4k and 1080p video downloads.
Site updates on average 4 days a week.
Lots of stunning outdoors shoots in spectacular locations.
Many rarely seen Latina models from South America.
Excellent download speeds getting 6 MB/s pretty much my max.
No problem using my D/L manager (DTA). |
| Cons: |
No longer a PU discount ($9.99 deals can be found if you know where to look).
The old “Erotic Dreams 4 You” bonus sites no longer available.
No small or medium collectable sized photo zips and no video downloads below 1080p on newest content so you'll need a lot of storage space if you want to download a lot.
Poor file naming of zip and video downloads with date only. Why not include the model name and title of set as they do at MetArt?
Earliest videos low resolution at 600 x 480 as expected for 2005.
Many models don't get past a single casting shoot.
Truly awful site design and navigation particularly for users of desktop pcs or laptops, there's probably not enough characters here to list all my complaints so will explain more in the bottom line.
My initial joy at finding a link to the old legacy site was short lived when I couldn't access it, “your connection is not secure. The owner of old.watch4beauty.com has configured their website improperly”. Tried 3 different browsers. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my first time back at W4B since I last reviewed it in late 2011 and the content continues to go from strength to strength having more than doubled in size since my last visit. The site stats as of today are 540 models, 2322 galleries, 548 films and 534 stories. Many of the galleries come with a corresponding behind the scenes type video so in actual fact there are a great deal more videos than the 548 listed on the separate films page but there's no easy way to count them due to the site layout. The stories are often magazine or blog type pictorial shoots often with videos featuring extras such as backstage pictures, selfies, compilations and travel/location pictures.
Whilst W4B features many of my current favourite MetArt models such as Mila Azul, Li Moon, Emily Bloom, Nika and Little Caprice,what really stands out for me is the wonderful collection of South American latina models they have here from Colombia and Venezuela, most of whom I have never seen before. Check out the likes of Denise Gomez, Irene Rouse, Abril, Karin Torres, Agatha Vega and Mily Mendoza. In the last week alone they have brought us another two young new talents from Colombia named Yeye and Paolina.
The content itself has a harder edge than similar sites like MetArt and Femjoy. Many of the sets feature masturbation, toy use including some with anal insertions, peeing and some lesbian action. There's a wide variety of locations from studio shoots with a plain back drop to spectacular outdoors locations. The public nudity shoots around Prague also look good fun as well.
And now for the bad news. What's the point of all this amazing content if you are going to present it in a truly awful website that is very difficult to navigate and find what you want. It basically seems as though the people at W4B have stuck two fingers up at PC and Laptop users. In a recent PU poll 82% of respondents claimed they use a home or work PC or laptop for browsing porn, go figure! You log into the members area and your navigational options are discover or models. Discover lists all updates on a single page, galleries, films, stories. That's over 3000 updates of endless scrolling with no way to search or sort them. There's no updates calender so if you've had a previous membership good luck trying to figure out what is new since you last joined. The models page is the same, 540 models listed in no particular order on one endless scrolling page. No way to search or sort them by most recent or oldest and no alphabetical A-Z listing. There's no advanced model search like the one at MetArt allowing you to search by criteria such as age, nationality, breast size, hair colour etc.
Next to “discover” and “models” you have a search icon. This is very basic with just a text box allowing you to search a model by name. This is all well and good if the model at W4B has the same name you know her by. If I search for one of my favourite models who is named Mia Sollis on most websites I will get no result because she is named Lynette at W4B. Apart from that on the search page they list their most popular tags, casting, masturbation, peeing, latina, girls, outdoor, and lesbian. Why not make all the tags available on the search page?
As a photo collector my biggest complaint here is the lack of a collectable sized resolution of the photo sets. I prefer to collect my photo sets in the 2-3000 px size range as the perfect compromise between quality and file size. The zip files of these almost 9000 px photo sets were often several hundred MBs to over 1 GB in size. If you don't collect full sets and just want to view the full size photos online or download selected individual photos again that's a very cumbersome chore. You click on a thumbnail and a photo opens in a new window sized to your screen size, no way to enlarge it to the full size and you can't “right click save as” on it. There's a download icon in the top right so click on that and the photo opens in another window again your screen size but this time you can enlarge it and save it. There's no back or forward arrows to navigate to other photos and no slideshow option so you have to repeat the process for any photo you might want to save.
Although I don't collect videos I have to admit the video quality here is some of the best I've ever seen. The 1080p ones I downloaded had bitrates ranging from 5k to 13k and a frame rate of 59 f/s. Like the photo sets this made for some large file sizes with one video I downloaded for example just over 10 minutes long being just over 1GB and the 4k version just over 2 GB.
If I was scoring this site on content alone it would be up there with the best in the 90s but the crappy site design really ruins the user experience for this desktop user so I'll stick with the 86 I scored it back in 2011. |
|
11-15-20 12:37pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
35
|
Glamour.cz
(0)
|
|
11-09-20 08:39am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
36
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
perversecult's Review
Thanks for your review and for highlighting the technical problems. On my last membership at another of their sites ATK Galleria my overriding impression of the site was that they seem to suffer from more technical problems than any other site I've ever joined. It also seems that when they have problems it affects all their sites as I remember another user describing the same problems at ATK Hairy site around the same time.
I would really like to join ATK Exotics again but I'm reluctant to spend the money on a site that's just going to piss me off with technical problems.
|
09-27-20 04:06am
|
Reply
37
|
TMW VR Net
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I often wonder myself if anyone actually reads the reviews these days because there is very little feedback. I do mostly read your reviews because you're about the only long standing member left who still regularly reviews some of the softcore sites that interest me.
Thanks again for you're complimentary words on my Digital Desire review. I only joined the site that time thanks to your own review of it a couple of weeks earlier.
Thanks for taking my comments in good spirit even if they appered a bit negative. Respect to you Sir. Stay safe in these troubled times we live in.
|
09-27-20 03:53am
|
Reply
38
|
Barely Legal
(0)
|
Reply of
astonman's Comment
Even as a photo collector I have found their tiny crappy resolution photos underwhelming as far back as the early 2000s when I first got online. I've never joined but seen plenty of their content on free sites. With a name like Barely Legal this site could have been amazing, afterall who doesn't love a barely legal looking teen hottie?
|
09-25-20 08:36am
|
Reply
39
|
TMW VR Net
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
Again I don't like to appear negative but I'm struggling to see the usefulness of reviewing a VR site without having access to VR equipment. It just seems like clutching at straws to gain extra raffle entries. Have you run out of other sites to review in the TMW network?
|
09-25-20 08:26am
|
Reply
40
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
I don't like to appear negative but i feel this review is way too long and contains too much irrelevant and off topic information. Do we really need two paragraphs explaining the meaning of ownership and copyright?
Peronally I write reviews offline in a word document then when I come to copy and paste into PU if any of the pros, cons or bottom line sections exceed the charecter limit I take that as advisory that I have waffled on too much and need to go back and edit the review down a bit.
Regarding the site itself disappointing to read that they have gone down to two updates a week from the daily updates they had at the time of my last membership in 2017.
|
09-25-20 08:09am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I feel that I virtually always get my money's worth when joining sites. I pretty much know what I'm going to get when joining a site due to a combination of the site tours, reading reviews and seeing their content on forums.
I often wonder if the opposite is true, do the sites get their money's worth out of me? As an example my recent membership of MetArt I joined for 1 month on a $9.95 special and downloaded over 11,000 photo sets, over 1.3 million photos of nearly 1500 models. That's an awful lot of models and photographers to pay for their content with what's left from ten bucks by the time PU have had their referral fee.
|
09-25-20 07:53am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Poll
A solid model index is the most important for me. Whenever I join a site I like to work my way through the models from A-Z. The update log only really comes into play for me on the second or subsequent times joining a site so that I can see what's new since my last membership.
|
09-25-20 07:40am
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 12-12-24
What about my entries for my review of Digital Desire?
|
08-05-20 01:31pm
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
Probably a bit more than is usual for me these days. I've had 4 subscriptions since the start of lockdown in March compared to just 5 in the whole of 2019. Being paid government money to stay at home these last few months has also given me the time to focus on a healthier diet and lifestyle with a lot of exercise and I've managed to lose 15 lbs in weight at the same time.
|
08-03-20 01:59am
|
Reply
45
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thanks for the complimentary feedback LKLK, much appreciated. Honestly I would love to post more reviews but as my primary interest is softcore photography based sites my choice of new sites to join is becoming rather limited these days and most of the new sites I do come across that catch my interest never seem to get listed at PU anymore.
|
08-03-20 01:10am
|
Review
46
|
Digital Desire
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Currently offering the bargain price of $9.95 for the first month.
Billing by Epoch with the option to use Paypal.
Site has been updating 3 to 4 times a week for the duration of my membership.
Large archive dating back 20 plus years.
Photo sets in up to 5 sizes, 800,1024,1280,1600 & 3000 px.
Zip downloads for photos but only in the largest available size.
Recent videos have up to 8 download options where 4k is available, 2160p, 1080p,720p,480p,360p & mobile in h264 format plus a 720p & 480p wmv option.
Streaming options Low, Normal, 720p,1080p & 4k.
User features include ratings, comments and add to favourites.
No problem using my download manager. (DTA) |
| Cons: |
Recurs at around $30 after the first month.
Pre-checked cross sale.
Updates regularly consist of recycled or remastered old content.
Some recent updates consist of non exclusive purchased content, I'm guessing they are not currently shooting due to the pandemic.
Not a huge amount of 4k content although not a problem for me as I don't download it.
If you're not into solo masturbation content you won't find a lot to interest you here.
Oldest content is lower resolution which is to be expected on a site that's been around this long. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site stats as of today 2nd August 2020:
Models: 1327
Photo sets: 3893
Videos: 1712
This is a site I've joined three times before but not since 2011, so my first time to go back and check it out since the death in 2013 of the main photographer and creator of the site J.Stephen Hicks. Since I've already collected all the photo sets issued prior to 2011 on my previous visits I just focused on the newer content since 2011 on this visit. The models who caught my eye this time include Alex Grey, Elena Koshka,, Emily Willis, Gia Paige, Lena Anderson, Lexie Fox and Uma Jolie. One thing I've always liked about this site is the nice selection of exotic models thanks to their featured “ethnic” category. Some of the ethnic models I really like include Alex De La Flor, Ivy Sherwood, Marica Hase, Megan Salinas, Noelle Monique, Scarlett Bloom and a pretty, large breasted ebony babe named Jezebel Vessir who I first noticed at MetArt a couple of months ago. Incidentally Charles Lightfoot who shot Jezebel's sets and many of the other Amercican models who appear at MetArt is also one of the photographers here at Digital Desire.
The vast majority of the site's content (around 95%) features solo females in artistic, erotic photo sets and videos including masturbation and occasional toy use. If you checkout their “Girlfriends” category you can find the lesbian content which includes 69 videos but nothing new has been added to this category since November 2018. It looks like they experimented with boy/girl hardcore porn for a brief while. If you check out their “Couples” category you'll find a handful of boy/girl shoots, 8 videos and 8 photo sets to be precise, all issued around 2015-16.
When it comes to browsing the site you have the usual categories of Videos, Photos and an A-Z model index. You then have another 15 sub categories to help you find more specific interests you might have. Aside from the Couples, Girlfriends and Ethnic categories already mentioned above others include Dreamgirls, Amateurs, Young N Fresh,Toy Lovers, Flashback and Backstage. Within each category you can then refine your search by criteria such as Hair Colour, Breast size and Pubic Hair.
Whilst the site has been updating 3 to 4 times a week during my membership when I look back through the updates from the past couple of months I don't see an awful lot that looks like new exclusively shot content. Just in the last week the updates were a photo set and video of Heather Summers who as far as I'm aware retired somewhere around 2011 and a Flashback remastered photo set of Sandra Shine who seems to have been around as long as I have had the internet. The video of Heather Summers had a maximum resolution of 480p so it's clearly more than 10 years old as even in my 2011 membership here they were producing videos in 720p. They also seem to be adding non exclusive purchased content similar to that found at sites like Teen Mega World and Club Seventeen. I know for a fact the video and photo set of the cute Asian girl named Aliona added in June of this year dates from around 2012 as I previously downloaded it from Club Seventeen where she was named Sevil. Looking at the update schedule for the month ahead they also have more of her Club Seventeen sets scheduled as future updates.
Although my main interest is the photo collection I've always found the videos at Digital Desire better than those at most similar solo nude/glamour type sites. They certainly contain more heat than the ones at MetArt for instance. They mostly start out with the model dressed in some clothing or lingerie then teasing and stripping before masturbating. There's background music at the start of the video which fades away as the model gets down to the action. Average runtime is around 10 to 15 minutes. I downloaded the 1080p versions which had a bitrate around 6000k.
Other features at the site include the Daily Photo, a Featured Model, a Daily Desktop and a Blog. There's also a link to what looks like a store selling sex toys but I can't enter as I just get a page saying “connection not secure, the owner has configured their website improperly”. Oh well, looks like no chance of me getting the free cock ring LKLK mentioned in his recent review.
In summary, 9 years on from my last membership here, I would say this is still a good site for collectors of softcore glamour content and good value at less than $10 but the seemingly increased use of recycled old sets and non exclusive content as updates means I'm going to score it a few points lower than I did in 2011. |
|
08-02-20 03:22pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
47
|
Puma Swede XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
First word first line of pros "Sophie"
If you're going to cut and paste the majority of your Sophie Dee review at least remember to change the name from Sophie to Puma so that it's not blatantly obvious you're submitting lazy cut and paste reviews.
|
08-01-20 05:21am
|
Reply
48
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Have to admit I was a little surprised to see a review for this site because as far as I was aware PU/TBP had delisted the DDF Network over some issues with the new ownership so seems strange that the network was delisted but the individual sites that made up the network are still listed.
|
07-09-20 10:00am
|
Reply
49
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
" lacking content. As of July 9, 2020 there are only 34 videos."
So the site tour showing 54 pages of videos 24 videos per page total 1279 videos is fake then?
|
07-09-20 08:31am
|
Reply
50
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Comment
I was wondering if this site has had a change of ownership. I noticed at the bottom of the home page they now say they are owned by Gamma Entertainment (the guys behind Adult Time). The company profile on the listing at The Best Porn implies that We Are Hairy is an indepently owned sight so possibly needs updating. Perhaps a change of ownership would explain the improvement to the problems you had before.
|
07-05-20 03:09pm
|
