| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
Thanks for checking that out Tom, I figured there's plenty of new content since my last membership here so signed up today, using the PU referral link of course.
|
07-05-20 02:52pm
|
Reply
52
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Noobs2's Reply
Thank you so much Noobs2, really appreciate you taking the time to answer my question. I got the impression from browsing the site tour that the navigation looks a total mess. Every time I go back to look at the tour I try and browse the models by most recent and it never changes, the first model in the list is always Nessa H even though her 1 photo set was from February 2018 so clearly something is not set up correctly to even update the model list.
I guess I will still join at some point when I feel I have the time and patience to go through the site. The sign up is not even working today when I'm trying to check the price, I'm just getting a time out server not responding.
|
07-05-20 03:36am
|
Reply
53
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I'm a sucker for those cheap deals too but unfortunately I've only just finished a subscription at MetArt last month and I don't really feel enough time has lapsed since my last subscription at SexArt to want to go back just yet. Limited options I'm afraid for fans of solo softcore content these days.
|
07-03-20 10:20am
|
Reply
54
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thanks for the reply and extra info. I went back and looked at the tour again and found the model index this time listed under the "more" heading which I never noticed before so was able to get a better idea of the models and their content.
I can't imagine the Jana Cova video would be new, she's been around since the early 2000s and must be at least 40 years old by now.
I guess I'll probably sign up this weekend since it's only $9.95 and I've seen no other holiday offers that interest me.
|
07-03-20 09:18am
|
Reply
55
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
This used to be one of my favourite sites. I've just realised I haven't had a membership here since I last reviewed it in 2011. You don't mention if the site is still adding new content. Is it still updating or if not are you able to say how long since it last updated (assuming the content is dated in the members area) as I don't see any dates in the preview area.
You mention 700+ models, I noted 800+ in my 2011 review so sounds like they have lost content rather than added it. Even back in 2011 I found that many of the updates were simply recycled earlier photo sets re-released in a larger size.
|
07-03-20 01:34am
|
Reply
56
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Cameramankeith's Review
Nice first review Sir. Can't disagree with anything you wrote. Hope to see more reviews from you as it sounds like we have similar tastes.
|
06-13-20 05:24am
|
Reply
57
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
I've just checked out their recent photo updates from the last couple of months on a forum and they all seem to be 3400 pixels but I have to say the quality of the latest photo sets is abysmal. They look like poor quality video screencaps rather than professionally shot photo shoots, they lack the clarity you find on professional photo shoots on sites like MetArt and are often blurred in places. If this is the new standard of the photo shoots at Wet and Puffy as a photo collector I can't see myself joining again anytime. I wouldn't even waste my time downloading these recent sets for free from the forum.
|
06-13-20 05:19am
|
Reply
58
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Hi pinkerton, another fabulous review. I should mention though that I think you'll find only a few of the very oldest photo sets on the site from 2010 and earlier had the 1600x1071 pixel size. At the time of my membership last year newest photosets were 2267x3400px. An easy mistake to make though if you don't collect photo sets, as I recall the high res versions were not available to view online and only in the zips unless things have changed in the last year.
|
06-12-20 12:37pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
Home desktop PC with 24 inch monitor 99.9% of the time. I have a small 10 inch laptop that I rarely use apart from when I'm travelling.
|
06-04-20 07:38am
|
Reply
60
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Comment
I certainly won't be rushing to join X-Art again anytime soon at those prices, $46.41 my end with CC Bill's good old regional pricing.
|
06-03-20 03:31am
|
Review
61
|
MetArt
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
PU/TBP discount, often memberships can be had for under $10 with holiday deals.
The ultimate site for fans of softcore photo erotica with a massive collection dating back 20 years.
Photos come in 3 sizes small, medium and large with a zip download for each.
Video download options from 270p up to 4k, stream options from 270p to 1080p.
4 new updates per day 7 days a week apart from the 1st of the month when you get 6.
No problems using my download manager. (Firefox DTA)
A multitude of user tools to set up your browsing options, search and sort the content as well as an advanced model search and user generated tags.
Billing by ECHST.net (Rocketgate), never had any problem with them and easy cancellation. |
| Cons: |
It's difficult to find any faults with the actual site or content itself. My only real gripe and I get this every time I join any site in the Met Art Network is the misleading pricing how they display the join price in USD and then charge me the same figure in GBP, that's why I'll only ever join any of their sites on holiday deals and stay for 1 month only.
If you prefer videos it's probably not the site for you. I don't care about videos so not really a con for me personally.
Earliest content on the site lower resolution which is to be expected. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site stats as of 31st May 2020:
3,729 models
21,274 galleries (over 2.5 million photos)
1708 videos
288 artists
This is my first time back to MetArt since I last reviewed it back in February 2012 thanks to the early May $10 holiday deal from PU/TBP and it's clear the site continues to go from strength to strength with the number of photo galleries having almost doubled in the last 8 years. There seems to be no let-up in the production line of hot young women coming out of Russia, Ukraine and other Eastern European countries willing to take their clothes off for our enjoyment and even during the current world pandemic they continue to provide 4 new updates every day. In the last 7 days there were 26 new photo sets and 2 new videos and this is typical of most weeks so still very much a photo orientated site.
Back in 2012 my favourite models here were all the well known Eastern Euro models from the 2000s such as Marketa Belonoha, Monika Vesela, Eve Angel, Ariel, Suzie Carina, Peaches and Eufrat but these days I much prefer the newer generation of models and favourites include Milena D (70 galleries, 6 videos) Mila Azul (42 galleries, 3 videos) and Emily Bloom (53 galleries, 6 videos). Mia Sollis, a cute freckled redhead who caught my eye as a relative newcomer with 6 or 7 galleries back in 2012 has taken over the crown of my favourite redhead from Faye Reagan and now has 67 galleries and 6 videos. Not forgetting my passion for exotic women there's the beautiful Asian goddess Li Moon with 51 galleries and 1 video and the dark, dusky Spanish senorita Apolonia with 18 galleries and 3 videos.
It's interesting looking back at my 2012 review and almost as if the guys at MetArt read it and changed things at the site to suit my personal preferences. The biggest improvement in the galleries is that the vast majority of sets now start with the model clothed or wearing lingerie so a greater emphasis on the tease and a more seductive feeling with the anticipation and build up to seeing the girl naked. I was never a huge fan of the photo sets where the girl is completely naked from picture number one although they can sometimes be nice when photographed in stunning outdoors locations. I was also never a fan of those pseudo-lesbian shoots featuring two or more girls so pleased to see they don't seem to bother with those here anymore and that its basically all solo content these days. There has only been 2 two girl photo sets added in the last 2 years and the last two girl video was released in 2016.
I'm not really that much into the videos and stated back in 2012 that I find the MetArt videos boring so decided to download some of the more recent videos of some of my favourite models to see if they have improved. I think the videos have improved to a point for the same reason as the photo galleries for the simple reason that the models start out in more clothing or lingerie than they used to making them more seductive. Watching Li Moon teasing on a bed in a white lace basque in the film titled “Beautiful Handwriting” and watching Apolonia stripping out of a college girl uniform in the film titled “Homework” was simply mesmerizing. Once the girls become naked though this is the point for me where the videos revert back to boring because they don't really do anything remotely sexual and I find myself just skipping to the end. I guess they don't go as far as masturbation or insertions to keep the distinction between MetArt and their more explicit sites Sex Art and Metart X.
Apart from the introduction of the 4k videos the technical specs of the content has not really changed much since my last visit in 2012. I have no idea if my PC could play a 4k video so don't bother with those. On the videos page in the sort options you can select 4k but on doing this to see how many they have I only got 6 videos in the search result so I assume they can't be tagging their 4k videos correctly to show up in the search. The size of the highest resolution photos still vary greatly as noted in 2012 with recent updates ranging from 4300 up to 9000 px on the long side. Personally I don't see the point of 9000 px photos with a 24 inch monitor when the model's face won't even fit inside your screen. As an obsessive photo set collector who likes to keep every set the medium 2048px photos suit me still as the perfect compromise between quality and file size.
I'm raising my score from 92 in 2012 to 98 today as the improvements in the content make the site almost as damn near perfect as possible for a collector of solo photo erotica such as myself. If they got rid of the regional pricing forcing me to pay 30% more than an American all the time I might even consider giving them a 100. |
|
05-31-20 07:15am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
62
|
Office Fantasy 2
(0)
|
Reply of
Homegirl's Review
Nice review. This sounds like the kind of site I would enjoy. A shame about Office Erotic though, they seem to have abolished the monthly subscribtion model and gone down the pay per photo set road. Who the heck is going to pay $2 to $5 per photo set?
|
05-30-20 04:00am
|
Reply
63
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Doctor's Review
Thanks for the review. I was wondering if they have an alphabetical A-Z model listing in the members area. A comment by KET924aab last year seemed to suggest they don't. When I look at the site tour I see no A-Z listing allowing me to preview the models there.
Like you I prefer high quality photo sites but I've never joined Femjoy. For years I was put off by the fact they didn't offer a decent mid size photo size for collectors but now they do appear to offer a decent 2500px mid size I'm put off by the fact that the navigation looks a complete mess judging by the preview.
|
05-05-20 04:55am
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I selected Absolutely I collect pics but since I only collect solo , glamour, erotica type content that answer could just as easily apply.
|
05-01-20 09:03am
|
Review
65
|
Pin-Up Wow
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Choice of CCBill or Epoch payment processors.
Exclusive content in 1037 photo galleries and 1079 videos.
Photos downloadable as zip files in high-res and low-res.
Around 75% of the videos are 1280 x 720 HD.
Simple site layout, easy to navigate and download manager friendly.
Fast downloads, I was getting 6 MB/s pretty much my maximum speed.
Plenty of info provided, model bios, gallery descriptions, file sizes for zip file and video downloads.
Site currently offering a lockdown bonus where you get 60 days for the price of 30. |
| Cons: |
This is an archive site with no updates. There's no dates on any of the content but I believe the site was active from around 2007 until 2013.
Not even a glimpse of naked pussy to be found here. This is a softcore glamour site with the emphasis on lingerie and tease. The most you will see is bare breasts and bum cheeks.
No way to view the high-res photos online, (only downloadable in the zips) unless I'm missing something.
Many of the videos are split into 2 or 3 parts.
No in-browser streaming of the videos.
Oldest videos max at 640 x 480.
Only download file type for video is wmv.
No PU discount. |
| Bottom Line: |
Just before Easter I received an email offering me a half price $12.47 membership at Pin-Up Wow so as I've never seen a discount offered for this site before and never previously had a membership here decided to take them up on the offer. It's a British glamour site based on the idea of classic pin-up art, think of Only Tease but with more of a retro feel to the outfits, hair styles and lingerie. Expect to see lots of silk and satin lingerie and nightwear, suspender belts, seamed stockings and high heels. There's also a lot of costume/uniform themed sets such as schoolgirl, French maid, nurse and air hostess.
Most of the British based models here are quite familiar to me having done the rounds at other British glamour sites like Only Tease, Art-Lingerie and St Mackenzies several years ago. The model index is split into two sections; one featuring the 6 Pin-Up Wow star models then another 45 models listed in the guest model section. The 6 star models Carla Brown (from Only Carla), Lucy-Anne Brookes, Hayley-Marie Coppin (from Hayley's Secrets), Petra So, Bryoni Kate & Jodie Gasson have a huge amount of content each with between 57 and 131 photo sets each and almost as many videos. You also get to learn more about them in the form of a written Q & A session. My favourite model here is Petra So due to her Asian looks and incidentally she is the model with the most content here with 131 photo sets and 124 videos.
The site layout looks rather dated, typically something from the early 2000s but it is user friendly and easy to get around. Click on Galleries and you get all the photo sets and videos across 212 pages at 10 per page. There's a drop down menu of page numbers so you can jump instantly to any page. You can also select just photo sets or just videos. Downloading from the site using my download manager (Down them all) was an absolute breeze, the download links for zips and videos are all on the main listing page so no need to open every individual gallery. Just scroll down each page of 10 galleries or videos and left click on the zip or video download links to queue them in your manager. The layout is the same browsing via the model index with each model's updates listed 10 per page. There's also a navigation heading for albums which implies that the galleries were split into albums dated by month and year but since the dates have been removed they are now just numbered 1 to 70. These albums come with clickable keywords, click on black stockings for example and it brings up 383 galleries featuring black stockings.
If you're going to browse the photo galleries online clicking on a thumbnail will open up the image in a size around 850 x 1130 px and there is also a slide show feature with the ability to change the time delay from 1 to 20 seconds per picture. I don't see any way to expand the images further or view the high-res version online so it appears they are only available by downloading the zips. The image sizes in the high-res zips range from a smallest size of around 1400 x 1900 for the oldest sets up to 2000 x 3000 for the newer ones and several sizes in between. Photo sets average around 140 pictures per set.
The photo shoots and videos nearly all appear to be shot in a studio against a plain backdrop and using various items of furniture or props to set the scene and they do tend to use the same ones over and over again so it can become a bit repetitive. The only variation from this was a handful that looked as though they were shot in a bedroom. It would have been nice to see some outdoor shoots. The shoots are nearly all solo apart from a small number of two girl or multi girl shoots. As I mentioned in the cons the content is very tame here with the emphasis being on the clothing and lingerie tease and then the model being topless towards the end of the shoot.
Most of the videos I downloaded appear to be behind the scenes photo shoot type videos. Some videos have background music and some others you can here the camera going off and the photographer giving directions to the model. The banter between the model and photographer gives you a chance to see her personality if you like that sort of thing. The videos are generally between 5 to 10 minutes run time and often come in 2 to 3 parts. Frankly I found the videos boring and won't keep any of them.
At the regular price of $25 I would probably never have joined so as a photo collector appreciated the chance to get in for half price and add the photo shoots of these British models to my collection. A score of 80 is about the best I can give to an archive site that has not added anything new in something like 7 years. |
|
04-27-20 02:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
66
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I suspect given jjrabbit's stated location in Netherlands he would be subject to the non US regional pricing rip off. Even using the PU discount link I would get charged £29.95 (GBP) to join this site equivilent of almost $37 (USD) at today's exchange rate. I'm afraid it's been a long time since I've been willing to pay that sort of price for any site. I'll rarely pay more than $10-15 these days.
|
04-21-20 05:32am
|
Reply
67
|
Girls Under Arrest
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
It seems the problem is more than a link that needs fixing, even if I type girlsunderarrest.com into my browser (assuming that was the correct url) I still get directed to isthisreal.com.
It's difficult to see how you can credibly leave up a new review for a site that appears to simply not exist anymore.
|
04-21-20 05:20am
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I prefer the totally bald look although if a girl is hot I'm really not that bothered if she has hair down below, I certainly wouldn't kick a girl out of bed for having a hairy bush.
|
04-18-20 02:40pm
|
Reply
69
|
Girls Under Arrest
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
When I click on the PU "visit site" link for this site I don't get taken to the site you allegedly reviewed, I get taken to a site called isthisreal.com. I thought the new admin at PU said they would only allow reviews for channels in the Adult Time network if they existed as individual sites in their own right such as the 21 Sextury network.
|
04-18-20 02:30pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
A difficult question to answer. Since my main interest is in collecting photo sets of solo models, (sites like Metart, ATK, Nubiles, ALS etc) and that's the only kind of content I'm willing to pay for then as long as the sites I join have downloadable photo sets preferrably in zips then I don't really care if the videos are stream only or downloading since I don't collect them.
If I'm in the mood to just watch generic hard core porn which isn't very often then I'm happy with the free tube sites so my answer to the question would be zero if that was an option.
|
03-18-20 08:45am
|
Reply
71
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
chtonia's Comment
I'm sure the webmaster will be along soon to let you know it's all your fault if his track record is anything to go by.
|
01-06-20 09:08am
|
Reply
72
|
All Fine Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
Wow 48 softcore photo sets of Mila Azul, that's enough to make me want to rip out my credit card. She is one hot young woman!
|
12-17-19 03:41pm
|
Reply
73
|
Stasy Q
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
That's a bit too small really, don't think I'd be willing to pay even $10 for photos that small. The high res photos I've seen elsewhere are 5760px long end. A lot of the sets look dark and shadowy and some of the pictures I looked at look a bit blurred at high resolution too. A lot of the sets only have 20 to 30 plus photos in them too.
I'm not sure it's even worth the effort to download them for free let alone pay $199 for it. Seems like these models are wasted on this site.
|
12-11-19 09:17am
|
Reply
74
|
Stasy Q
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for this informative review. I very nearly signed up for this site around Black Friday weekend but backed out and went with a half price email promo for APD Nudes instead. It sounds like I would of got precisely nothing for my $10 at Stasy Q.
From what I can gather the Ultimate membership is something like $199 for a lifetime membership but I could be wrong.
Your review has convinced me the best thing to do with this site is download their photosets for free from a forum if buying a membership gets you access to nothing.
|
12-11-19 03:38am
|
Reply
75
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Reply
Personally I don't have a problem with 19 year old photo content and if I'm joining a site that has been around that long I like to know their entire collection is available to view online. I just think there's a big difference between a site that's been online 19 years producing their own exclusive content and a site that's just been around a couple of years and posting 19 year old non exclusive content from other sites.
A person considering this site the most important thing they need to know is that if they've joined other sites in the Metart Network previously then they're unlikely to find anything new or exclusive here.
Sorry you didn't approve of my original comment, maybe I could have worded it better.
|
12-09-19 09:58am
|
