| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Reply
LOL....not trying to be a snob or elitist, just pointing out that it's a compilation site created by the guys at Metart 2 or 3 years ago where they took many of their hairy models photo sets and videos and created a new site for those people who are interested in just hairy models to find them all in one place.
I agree though that when you see 2001 dates on some of the photo sets it could give the impression of the site being 19 years old but that is most likely the original posting date on Metart.
There was me thinking I was being helpful offering some feedback on an error, I'll just shut up in future.
|
12-09-19 05:50am
|
Reply
77
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
The site has not been around for 19 years, I believe it's only been around 2 or 3 years. It's a collection of non exclusive content pulled from the sites within the Metart Network (ie Metart, Viv Thomas. Erotic Beauty etc).
Where you see the old dates on the content that will most likely be the dates they were originally posted on sites like Metart or Viv Thomas.
|
12-09-19 02:27am
|
Reply
78
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
Download limits suck especially when sites don't declare them before you signed up. Last Sunday I signed up to a site as a result of an email promo offering a Black Friday/Cyber Monday half price deal and within 10 minutes of logging in I had hit a download limit after downloading only 11 photo zips despite the sign up page advertising "unrestricted downloads".
|
12-06-19 07:04am
|
Reply
79
|
Ass America
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I would say about 80% copy & paste of your 10-24-17 review.
|
12-04-19 09:09am
|
Reply
80
|
Black Valley Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
90% copy & paste of your 07-26-18 review.
|
12-04-19 09:06am
|
Review
81
|
Skokoff
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
PU/TBP discounted price of $14.95.
Billing by CC Bill with no regional pricing from the UK.
Exclusive content.
Photos available in 3 sizes, small 667 x 1000px, medium 1333 x 2000px and large size varies between 2000 x 3008px and 3744 x 5616px.
Zip downloads in the 3 different sizes.
Good sized photo collection, 136 models in 665 photo sets (74,000 total photos).
Fast downloads, I was getting close to 6 MB/sec, pretty much my maximum speed.
File names (zips) include model name/set name.
No problems using my D/L manager (DTA).
Video downloads available in 4 formats, avi, mov, mp4 & wmv. |
| Cons: |
The last update was over 6 months ago.
Video section is small, only 30 movies.
Content is very softcore, mostly solo nude posing.
Zero diversity, the models are all white, slim and young.
Errors, a number of photo sets contain a few corrupted jpg images, some images with an errant watermark appearing in the middle of the photo, 3 photo galleries with missing zips had to be downloaded picture by picture. |
| Bottom Line: |
Skokoff is a solo photographer site featuring the work of the similarly named Skokov who had 120 plus photo sets at Metart between 2005-08 before going solo with this website. Back then he was one of my favourite photographers at Metart as he always seemed to have the knack of finding some of the freshest, youngest looking talent to photograph and that trend certainly continues on this site. Whilst not all models here have stats or bio info those that do are virtually all Russian with given ages between 18-21. Some of my long time favourite models who appear here include Emily Bloom, Natasha (the girl from Ero Nata & Helen's Planet) & Irka (Sweet Ira).
The earliest content on the site dates from June 2008 and the site updated fairly regularly until around 2013. The biggest negative about the site is that since 2013 the updates have become somewhat sporadic sometimes going weeks, months and at one point nearly 2 years without any new updates between 2016 and 2018. The site seemed to come alive again in August 2018 with 30 new photo sets added between then and May 2019 but has now again gone 6 months without posting anything new at this point.
The site has a nice uncluttered layout with large preview thumbnails of the models and galleries and none of the junk you get everywhere else these days such as ads, up-sells and live cams. The navigation is simple and functional with just categories for galleries, movies and models. You can sort each section by most popular, alphabetically and by newest or oldest.. You can also rank the models and sets, submit comments and add to favourites. There's no search engine but I'm not sure it's really needed on a site this size, the models are all young and beautiful so you'll probably just want to start at A, work your way through and download every photo set. It took me less than a week to download the entire site.
The photo collection is the main attraction of this site. If you are into softcore photo erotica sites such as Metart, Femjoy and MPL Studios then you will surely appreciate the content at Skokoff. It's the same type of thing, beautiful young models photographed in a nice variety of indoor and outdoor locations, also a mix of sets that start out clothed, some partially clothed as well as plain nude sets from start to finish. The sets are mostly solo with a handful of two girl sets. Whilst the girls get fully nude including open leg shots they don't show any pink, there's no finger insertions and no masturbation or toy use.
Those who prefer videos will want to give this site a miss, there are only 30 movies here and they all date from 2008-2009. Of the four available formats I opted for the mp4 files, 24 of the 30 videos were 1280 x 720 semi hd with bitrates ranging between 1500 to 3000k, the other 6 came in at 720 x 576. I noticed the avi files had a larger file size so I tried a couple to see what they were and they were also 1280 x 720 with a higher bitrate around 4000k. Typically for this kind of site though I found the videos boring. Several are photo shoot type videos, some are girl takes a shower and rubs soap into her body, girl rubs oil into her body, girl rolls around on a bed caressing her body, girl in a pool splashing water...you get the picture.
If you're into softcore Metart style photo erotica and not joined here before then this site is worth a month with the PU discounted price at less than $15 to download the collection. You wouldn't want to stay any longer given the sporadic nature of the updates. |
|
12-03-19 05:39am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
82
|
Mobile Ruth Blackwell
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
"I assume that the review will be approved, because I can't find anything wrong with it. It wasn't written to be a fraudulent review."
I beg to differ, the entire review is a direct copy and paste of the review he wrote 2 months ago for the non mobile version of the site with about 2 lines added/amended. If that isn't a deliberate attempt to deceive then I don't know what is.
|
11-22-19 10:12am
|
Reply
83
|
Mobile Ruth Blackwell
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
And 90% copy and paste same as most of the 30 other Dogfart Network reviews he's put up in the last year. This for me is a large part of the reason why PU is becoming tired and stale. A high percentage of the reviews these days are of sites within a few large networks (Adult Time, TMW, Dogfart, Team Skeet, Lets Doe It etc etc). I see very little of anything new or interesting here these days. Most new sites don't even get listed here anymore.
|
11-22-19 04:38am
|
Reply
84
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I think most of us are aware of this difference by now as you've been telling us constantly for what seems like forever and if anyone wasn't aware of it you made the point clearly in the first few lines of the review but then proceeded to fill the entire pros, cons and the start of the bottom line section waffling on about it. When you eventually started the cons you went on about it again then the first paragraph of your bottom line was yet again about the search engine. Honestly this review is 90% waffle and 10% substance.
But you're correct in that maybe I don't appreciate the importance of the search engine as I never use them when joining a site. I just prefer to browse through an A-Z model index from start to finish downloading the models I like. I have no idea if I would be able to do that at Fuck Studies or indeed TMW though because throughout all the waffle I don't recall seeing any mention if the sites have an A-Z model index which I would have thought was more important for a network which you claim has over 2000 models. A search engine is all well and good if a model you're searching for has the same name on the site that you know her by but as we all know that's not always the case.
|
11-01-19 02:57am
|
Reply
85
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
Another review of Teen Mega World zzzzzzzz. This review told us virtually nothing about Fuck Studies the site you were supposed to be reviewing, just repeating the same things you say in every other review of TMW sites. I understand it must get difficult to find anything new to say about TMW sites when you've clocked up over 50 reviews of them between this and your previous user name.
|
10-31-19 04:46pm
|
Reply
86
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Satine's Reply
Thanks for the reply Satine,I do agree that $70 is a lot to pay for unlimited downloads but they are clear and transparent with their pricing and provide a wide range of join options starting at $10. Not everyone wants unlimited 4k downloads, I certainly wouldn't.
|
10-19-19 06:31am
|
Reply
87
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I didn't mention anything about the raffle. My point was about the entire review being a copy and paste of a previous review.
Rule 4 for being awarded feedback points towards user rankings states:
4. Review should be unique compared to previously written reviews. No copy/paste material.
So you should not be awarded any feedback points for this review if the rules are followed but I doubt that will be the case.
|
10-08-19 09:23am
|
Reply
88
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Reading this review I just had the feeling that I've read it before so I looked back and it appears this entire review is an exact copy and paste of your September 2017 review of the same site with just the number of scenes and number of updates changed in the pros and cons. Only problem is you haven't changed the bottom line to match where you repeat the number of scenes and update rate at the site so your bottom line contradicts your pros and cons....Careless dude!
I've often wondered how some of you guys manage to get through so many porn subscriptions and reviews because it takes me bloody hours to write a review, often an entire evening or longer....now I know...copy, paste, submit. Do you even have a subscription here because the number of scenes can easily be updated just by visiting the site tour?
|
10-08-19 09:02am
|
Reply
89
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
That thought crossed my mind but they've had the current pricing model in place for quite some time now so it would have been the same at the previous reviews.
At least they are clear and transparent about their pricing options unlike some of the sites these days where you don't find out downloading costs extra until after you've already signed up.
|
10-07-19 02:49pm
|
Review
90
|
18 Magazine
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
A huge archive of classic solo model sites which mostly date from the early to mid 2000s.
Over a million photos in 15,000+ sets, 3500+ videos and 800+ models.
Includes bonus site access to All Sorts Of Girls and the Kristina Fey legacy site.
Much of the content particularly the solo model sites is exclusive.
Updates added a couple of times a month although these tend to be remastered old sets rather than actual new content.
The most recent remastered photo updates are 1696 x 2544 px in size.
All photo sets can be downloaded in zips.
No problems using my download manager (DTA).
Reasonable price tag of $19.95/ month.
Choice of CC Bill or Verotel as the payment processor, I just felt more comfortable using CC Bill despite their regional pricing adding an extra $2-3 to the price. |
| Cons: |
Due to the age of the content video quality is generally poor by today's standards.
Whilst some models show everything much of the content is very softcore, some models are non nude, some are topless only, some with mild nudity without spreading.
Poor file naming of zips, just meaningless numbers (e.g. set_1234).
Some models have their photo sets split up into between 2 to 4 parts so due to the meaningless zip file names you will probably need to rename your zips as you download them if you want to amalgamate the multiple parts of each photo set into one folder.
Annoying captcha on log in page. |
| Bottom Line: |
18 Magazine is a collection of 66 archive sites brought together under one subscription. Around 46 of the sites are solo model sites with the rest made up of a variety of multi model sites with various themes including a few foot fetish sites and a dedicated lesbian site. My main reason for joining was because I wanted to add the photo sets of some of the classic solo model sites to my collection such as Katie Fey, Andi Pink, Piper Fawn, Brittany's Bod, Mia Kimmy and Paris Tale amongst others. Back around 2005 when many of these sites were first around many of them were stand alone sites charging $30 for a membership so you could have spent several hundred dollars back then joining all these sites so it's great that they are all available now for one modestly priced $20 membership.
I would guess something like 90% of the content across this network of sites consists of softcore solo amateur teens in striptease type content ranging from non nude posing and teasing through to topless and explicit nudity depending on the model. Those looking for hardcore B/G videos would find little of interest and what there is the resolution is pretty poor by today's standards and not worth bothering with.
The navigation is fairly basic, you've got the usual sections for pictures, videos or models. Selecting pictures or videos you can then either select to view the content by most recent, most liked, most commented or top rated. You also have a couple of drop down menus where you can select content from a month or year right back to 2003 and from any specific one of the 66 sites in the network. You also have a display option where you can select the number of thumbnails to display per page. There's an alphabetical model index showing models across the entire network and you can click on any letter of the alphabet from A-Z. The site lacks any kind of advanced model search though.
Most of the photo content here is sized at between 1024px and 1280px long end which was fairly decent at the time it was created back around 2005 and even today these photos hold up quite well, I thought most of the photos looked pretty decent on my 24 inch monitor. In addition to this you have a sizeable amount of remastered photos; the Katie Fey (a.k.a.Jenya D at Metart) collection has around 42,000 photos that have been remastered up to at least 2048 px or larger; Brittany's Bod site has around 18,000 photos that have been remastered to 3072 px. The Kristina Fey legacy site that I'd previously had a membership at back around 2005 or 06 I found that all the photo sets I'd downloaded back then at 1024px have now been remastered up to 2048px, around 35,000 photos in total.
Due to the poorly named zip files and many of the photo sets being split into several parts it takes a lot of extra work and patience trying to organise your collection from this site as I found I needed to rename everything as I was downloading. Thankfully the individual photo file names from the sets split into several parts were consecutively numbered in most cases so you could put all parts of the set into one folder without any renumbering.
As a photo collector I didn't spend an awful lot of time exploring the video collection but what I did watch I was not very impressed with. Whilst you might find the occasional 1280x720 remastered video here and there the vast majority I downloaded were in resolutions like 720x480 or 768x576 with bit rates ranging from around 1000 to 1400k so barely watchable compared to the hd resolutions we're used to these days. I also found the videos a bit amateurish with a cameraman who seemed to have trouble holding the camera still and focusing on the girl at times.
As I ran out of time I wasn't able to to fully explore the bonus site All Sorts Of Girls but one thing I did notice is that they have the entire archives of the old Ebina Models site within so the combined subscription along with 18 Magazine provides a huge treasure trove of classic photo content and models for collectors. As a photo collector I feel I got plenty of value from my month's subscription but if your preference is for videos I would probably give it a miss unless there's some models you really have to have. |
|
10-07-19 02:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
91
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
10-04-19 03:14am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
92
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
Reply of
flashman21's Review
I really like Kari but I could never quite bring myself to pay $30 for this site. There are plenty of other sites where she has appeared naked.
It's one of those sites where if it was $10 or less I would happily sign up to download her photosets but at $30 I'll just download what I can find from free sites.
|
09-26-19 09:02am
|
Reply
93
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
yujin's Reply
That's good to hear. Thanks for the update yujin.
|
09-26-19 08:48am
|
Reply
94
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I'd be interested to know the answer on that. It just seems like a cheap attempt at gaining raffle entries to me, almost as bad as writing reviews of the same site under two different user names. If this is the standard PU has fallen to I can see myself disabling my account in the not too distant future.
|
09-25-19 10:11am
|
Reply
95
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I can read what you wrote. If I click on the visit site link on this Bare Maidens page where you have placed your review I am taken to the Bare Maidens site and not the Adult Time site therefore I think it is misleading. This is not a review of the Bare Maidens site and from what I can gather you don't have a membership at the Bare Maidens site therefore you are conning people with this review. If I'm reading a review of Bare Maidens which is a site i'm quite interested in I want to know things like the photo resolution and do they have zip downloads, are they still adding new content.
This review serves no useful purpose in my opnion and if anything reads more like a review for Adult Time and should be placed on the Adult Time page.
Maybe I'm getting cynical in my old age but putting up a review of a site you're not a member of based on a few sample videos on another site just seems like a cheap way of gaining raffle entries. Personally I've only written one review in the last year as I've got to the stage where I'm thinking what's the point when you've got certain people attempting to monopolize the raffle by churning out the same old reviews week after week of different sites in the same network.
|
09-25-19 10:02am
|
Reply
96
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
So this is not really a review of the actual Bare Maidens site then. It's just a review of a handful of sample or promo videos within Adult Time which is rather misleading in my opinion. This review should be deleted.
|
09-24-19 12:18pm
|
Reply
97
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
So do you get access to the 102,000 Bare Maidens photos through the Adult Time membership then?
|
09-24-19 10:29am
|
Reply
98
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I'd also noticed a couple of weeks ago that his previous review of Tricky Masseur that he won a prize for was less than 5 months from his previous review under the old user name. I have to admit that all these reviews for different sites in the large networks (Teen Mega World, Let's Doe it etc.) are starting to become a bit monotonous, I feel like I'm reading the same reviews over and over again every week but learning nothing new about the actual sites. Just feels like a cheap attempt to monopolise the raffle IMHO.
|
08-22-19 12:35am
|
Reply
99
|
Ariel Rebel
(0)
|
Reply of
zwixxx's Comment
Thanks for the warning, I really like Ariel but have never joined her site. Years ago I would never have knowingly joined a site without zip files but these days I see it as more of a challenge to try and batch download the images with either my BID or DTA download managers....34 GBPs though is a hefty price tag.
|
08-09-19 02:33am
|
Comment
100
|
Pretty Foxes
(0)
|
|
07-29-19 01:14am
Replies (0)
|
