| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 01-08-25
What about my entries for my review of Digital Desire?
|
08-05-20 01:31pm
|
Reply
152
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
Probably a bit more than is usual for me these days. I've had 4 subscriptions since the start of lockdown in March compared to just 5 in the whole of 2019. Being paid government money to stay at home these last few months has also given me the time to focus on a healthier diet and lifestyle with a lot of exercise and I've managed to lose 15 lbs in weight at the same time.
|
08-03-20 01:59am
|
Reply
153
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thanks for the complimentary feedback LKLK, much appreciated. Honestly I would love to post more reviews but as my primary interest is softcore photography based sites my choice of new sites to join is becoming rather limited these days and most of the new sites I do come across that catch my interest never seem to get listed at PU anymore.
|
08-03-20 01:10am
|
Reply
154
|
Puma Swede XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
First word first line of pros "Sophie"
If you're going to cut and paste the majority of your Sophie Dee review at least remember to change the name from Sophie to Puma so that it's not blatantly obvious you're submitting lazy cut and paste reviews.
|
08-01-20 05:21am
|
Reply
155
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Have to admit I was a little surprised to see a review for this site because as far as I was aware PU/TBP had delisted the DDF Network over some issues with the new ownership so seems strange that the network was delisted but the individual sites that made up the network are still listed.
|
07-09-20 10:00am
|
Reply
156
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
" lacking content. As of July 9, 2020 there are only 34 videos."
So the site tour showing 54 pages of videos 24 videos per page total 1279 videos is fake then?
|
07-09-20 08:31am
|
Reply
157
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Comment
I was wondering if this site has had a change of ownership. I noticed at the bottom of the home page they now say they are owned by Gamma Entertainment (the guys behind Adult Time). The company profile on the listing at The Best Porn implies that We Are Hairy is an indepently owned sight so possibly needs updating. Perhaps a change of ownership would explain the improvement to the problems you had before.
|
07-05-20 03:09pm
|
Reply
158
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
Thanks for checking that out Tom, I figured there's plenty of new content since my last membership here so signed up today, using the PU referral link of course.
|
07-05-20 02:52pm
|
Reply
159
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Noobs2's Reply
Thank you so much Noobs2, really appreciate you taking the time to answer my question. I got the impression from browsing the site tour that the navigation looks a total mess. Every time I go back to look at the tour I try and browse the models by most recent and it never changes, the first model in the list is always Nessa H even though her 1 photo set was from February 2018 so clearly something is not set up correctly to even update the model list.
I guess I will still join at some point when I feel I have the time and patience to go through the site. The sign up is not even working today when I'm trying to check the price, I'm just getting a time out server not responding.
|
07-05-20 03:36am
|
Reply
160
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I'm a sucker for those cheap deals too but unfortunately I've only just finished a subscription at MetArt last month and I don't really feel enough time has lapsed since my last subscription at SexArt to want to go back just yet. Limited options I'm afraid for fans of solo softcore content these days.
|
07-03-20 10:20am
|
Reply
161
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thanks for the reply and extra info. I went back and looked at the tour again and found the model index this time listed under the "more" heading which I never noticed before so was able to get a better idea of the models and their content.
I can't imagine the Jana Cova video would be new, she's been around since the early 2000s and must be at least 40 years old by now.
I guess I'll probably sign up this weekend since it's only $9.95 and I've seen no other holiday offers that interest me.
|
07-03-20 09:18am
|
Reply
162
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
This used to be one of my favourite sites. I've just realised I haven't had a membership here since I last reviewed it in 2011. You don't mention if the site is still adding new content. Is it still updating or if not are you able to say how long since it last updated (assuming the content is dated in the members area) as I don't see any dates in the preview area.
You mention 700+ models, I noted 800+ in my 2011 review so sounds like they have lost content rather than added it. Even back in 2011 I found that many of the updates were simply recycled earlier photo sets re-released in a larger size.
|
07-03-20 01:34am
|
Reply
163
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Cameramankeith's Review
Nice first review Sir. Can't disagree with anything you wrote. Hope to see more reviews from you as it sounds like we have similar tastes.
|
06-13-20 05:24am
|
Reply
164
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
I've just checked out their recent photo updates from the last couple of months on a forum and they all seem to be 3400 pixels but I have to say the quality of the latest photo sets is abysmal. They look like poor quality video screencaps rather than professionally shot photo shoots, they lack the clarity you find on professional photo shoots on sites like MetArt and are often blurred in places. If this is the new standard of the photo shoots at Wet and Puffy as a photo collector I can't see myself joining again anytime. I wouldn't even waste my time downloading these recent sets for free from the forum.
|
06-13-20 05:19am
|
Reply
165
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Hi pinkerton, another fabulous review. I should mention though that I think you'll find only a few of the very oldest photo sets on the site from 2010 and earlier had the 1600x1071 pixel size. At the time of my membership last year newest photosets were 2267x3400px. An easy mistake to make though if you don't collect photo sets, as I recall the high res versions were not available to view online and only in the zips unless things have changed in the last year.
|
06-12-20 12:37pm
|
Reply
166
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
Home desktop PC with 24 inch monitor 99.9% of the time. I have a small 10 inch laptop that I rarely use apart from when I'm travelling.
|
06-04-20 07:38am
|
Reply
167
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Comment
I certainly won't be rushing to join X-Art again anytime soon at those prices, $46.41 my end with CC Bill's good old regional pricing.
|
06-03-20 03:31am
|
Reply
168
|
Office Fantasy 2
(0)
|
Reply of
Homegirl's Review
Nice review. This sounds like the kind of site I would enjoy. A shame about Office Erotic though, they seem to have abolished the monthly subscribtion model and gone down the pay per photo set road. Who the heck is going to pay $2 to $5 per photo set?
|
05-30-20 04:00am
|
Reply
169
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Doctor's Review
Thanks for the review. I was wondering if they have an alphabetical A-Z model listing in the members area. A comment by KET924aab last year seemed to suggest they don't. When I look at the site tour I see no A-Z listing allowing me to preview the models there.
Like you I prefer high quality photo sites but I've never joined Femjoy. For years I was put off by the fact they didn't offer a decent mid size photo size for collectors but now they do appear to offer a decent 2500px mid size I'm put off by the fact that the navigation looks a complete mess judging by the preview.
|
05-05-20 04:55am
|
Reply
170
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I selected Absolutely I collect pics but since I only collect solo , glamour, erotica type content that answer could just as easily apply.
|
05-01-20 09:03am
|
Reply
171
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I suspect given jjrabbit's stated location in Netherlands he would be subject to the non US regional pricing rip off. Even using the PU discount link I would get charged £29.95 (GBP) to join this site equivilent of almost $37 (USD) at today's exchange rate. I'm afraid it's been a long time since I've been willing to pay that sort of price for any site. I'll rarely pay more than $10-15 these days.
|
04-21-20 05:32am
|
Reply
172
|
Girls Under Arrest
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
It seems the problem is more than a link that needs fixing, even if I type girlsunderarrest.com into my browser (assuming that was the correct url) I still get directed to isthisreal.com.
It's difficult to see how you can credibly leave up a new review for a site that appears to simply not exist anymore.
|
04-21-20 05:20am
|
Reply
173
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I prefer the totally bald look although if a girl is hot I'm really not that bothered if she has hair down below, I certainly wouldn't kick a girl out of bed for having a hairy bush.
|
04-18-20 02:40pm
|
Reply
174
|
Girls Under Arrest
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
When I click on the PU "visit site" link for this site I don't get taken to the site you allegedly reviewed, I get taken to a site called isthisreal.com. I thought the new admin at PU said they would only allow reviews for channels in the Adult Time network if they existed as individual sites in their own right such as the 21 Sextury network.
|
04-18-20 02:30pm
|
Reply
175
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
A difficult question to answer. Since my main interest is in collecting photo sets of solo models, (sites like Metart, ATK, Nubiles, ALS etc) and that's the only kind of content I'm willing to pay for then as long as the sites I join have downloadable photo sets preferrably in zips then I don't really care if the videos are stream only or downloading since I don't collect them.
If I'm in the mood to just watch generic hard core porn which isn't very often then I'm happy with the free tube sites so my answer to the question would be zero if that was an option.
|
03-18-20 08:45am
|
