| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
chtonia's Comment
I'm sure the webmaster will be along soon to let you know it's all your fault if his track record is anything to go by.
|
01-06-20 09:08am
|
Reply
177
|
All Fine Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
Wow 48 softcore photo sets of Mila Azul, that's enough to make me want to rip out my credit card. She is one hot young woman!
|
12-17-19 03:41pm
|
Reply
178
|
Stasy Q
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
That's a bit too small really, don't think I'd be willing to pay even $10 for photos that small. The high res photos I've seen elsewhere are 5760px long end. A lot of the sets look dark and shadowy and some of the pictures I looked at look a bit blurred at high resolution too. A lot of the sets only have 20 to 30 plus photos in them too.
I'm not sure it's even worth the effort to download them for free let alone pay $199 for it. Seems like these models are wasted on this site.
|
12-11-19 09:17am
|
Reply
179
|
Stasy Q
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for this informative review. I very nearly signed up for this site around Black Friday weekend but backed out and went with a half price email promo for APD Nudes instead. It sounds like I would of got precisely nothing for my $10 at Stasy Q.
From what I can gather the Ultimate membership is something like $199 for a lifetime membership but I could be wrong.
Your review has convinced me the best thing to do with this site is download their photosets for free from a forum if buying a membership gets you access to nothing.
|
12-11-19 03:38am
|
Reply
180
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Reply
Personally I don't have a problem with 19 year old photo content and if I'm joining a site that has been around that long I like to know their entire collection is available to view online. I just think there's a big difference between a site that's been online 19 years producing their own exclusive content and a site that's just been around a couple of years and posting 19 year old non exclusive content from other sites.
A person considering this site the most important thing they need to know is that if they've joined other sites in the Metart Network previously then they're unlikely to find anything new or exclusive here.
Sorry you didn't approve of my original comment, maybe I could have worded it better.
|
12-09-19 09:58am
|
Reply
181
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Reply
LOL....not trying to be a snob or elitist, just pointing out that it's a compilation site created by the guys at Metart 2 or 3 years ago where they took many of their hairy models photo sets and videos and created a new site for those people who are interested in just hairy models to find them all in one place.
I agree though that when you see 2001 dates on some of the photo sets it could give the impression of the site being 19 years old but that is most likely the original posting date on Metart.
There was me thinking I was being helpful offering some feedback on an error, I'll just shut up in future.
|
12-09-19 05:50am
|
Reply
182
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
The site has not been around for 19 years, I believe it's only been around 2 or 3 years. It's a collection of non exclusive content pulled from the sites within the Metart Network (ie Metart, Viv Thomas. Erotic Beauty etc).
Where you see the old dates on the content that will most likely be the dates they were originally posted on sites like Metart or Viv Thomas.
|
12-09-19 02:27am
|
Reply
183
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
Download limits suck especially when sites don't declare them before you signed up. Last Sunday I signed up to a site as a result of an email promo offering a Black Friday/Cyber Monday half price deal and within 10 minutes of logging in I had hit a download limit after downloading only 11 photo zips despite the sign up page advertising "unrestricted downloads".
|
12-06-19 07:04am
|
Reply
184
|
Ass America
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I would say about 80% copy & paste of your 10-24-17 review.
|
12-04-19 09:09am
|
Reply
185
|
Black Valley Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
90% copy & paste of your 07-26-18 review.
|
12-04-19 09:06am
|
Reply
186
|
Mobile Ruth Blackwell
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
"I assume that the review will be approved, because I can't find anything wrong with it. It wasn't written to be a fraudulent review."
I beg to differ, the entire review is a direct copy and paste of the review he wrote 2 months ago for the non mobile version of the site with about 2 lines added/amended. If that isn't a deliberate attempt to deceive then I don't know what is.
|
11-22-19 10:12am
|
Reply
187
|
Mobile Ruth Blackwell
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
And 90% copy and paste same as most of the 30 other Dogfart Network reviews he's put up in the last year. This for me is a large part of the reason why PU is becoming tired and stale. A high percentage of the reviews these days are of sites within a few large networks (Adult Time, TMW, Dogfart, Team Skeet, Lets Doe It etc etc). I see very little of anything new or interesting here these days. Most new sites don't even get listed here anymore.
|
11-22-19 04:38am
|
Reply
188
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I think most of us are aware of this difference by now as you've been telling us constantly for what seems like forever and if anyone wasn't aware of it you made the point clearly in the first few lines of the review but then proceeded to fill the entire pros, cons and the start of the bottom line section waffling on about it. When you eventually started the cons you went on about it again then the first paragraph of your bottom line was yet again about the search engine. Honestly this review is 90% waffle and 10% substance.
But you're correct in that maybe I don't appreciate the importance of the search engine as I never use them when joining a site. I just prefer to browse through an A-Z model index from start to finish downloading the models I like. I have no idea if I would be able to do that at Fuck Studies or indeed TMW though because throughout all the waffle I don't recall seeing any mention if the sites have an A-Z model index which I would have thought was more important for a network which you claim has over 2000 models. A search engine is all well and good if a model you're searching for has the same name on the site that you know her by but as we all know that's not always the case.
|
11-01-19 02:57am
|
Reply
189
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
Another review of Teen Mega World zzzzzzzz. This review told us virtually nothing about Fuck Studies the site you were supposed to be reviewing, just repeating the same things you say in every other review of TMW sites. I understand it must get difficult to find anything new to say about TMW sites when you've clocked up over 50 reviews of them between this and your previous user name.
|
10-31-19 04:46pm
|
Reply
190
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Satine's Reply
Thanks for the reply Satine,I do agree that $70 is a lot to pay for unlimited downloads but they are clear and transparent with their pricing and provide a wide range of join options starting at $10. Not everyone wants unlimited 4k downloads, I certainly wouldn't.
|
10-19-19 06:31am
|
Reply
191
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I didn't mention anything about the raffle. My point was about the entire review being a copy and paste of a previous review.
Rule 4 for being awarded feedback points towards user rankings states:
4. Review should be unique compared to previously written reviews. No copy/paste material.
So you should not be awarded any feedback points for this review if the rules are followed but I doubt that will be the case.
|
10-08-19 09:23am
|
Reply
192
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Reading this review I just had the feeling that I've read it before so I looked back and it appears this entire review is an exact copy and paste of your September 2017 review of the same site with just the number of scenes and number of updates changed in the pros and cons. Only problem is you haven't changed the bottom line to match where you repeat the number of scenes and update rate at the site so your bottom line contradicts your pros and cons....Careless dude!
I've often wondered how some of you guys manage to get through so many porn subscriptions and reviews because it takes me bloody hours to write a review, often an entire evening or longer....now I know...copy, paste, submit. Do you even have a subscription here because the number of scenes can easily be updated just by visiting the site tour?
|
10-08-19 09:02am
|
Reply
193
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
That thought crossed my mind but they've had the current pricing model in place for quite some time now so it would have been the same at the previous reviews.
At least they are clear and transparent about their pricing options unlike some of the sites these days where you don't find out downloading costs extra until after you've already signed up.
|
10-07-19 02:49pm
|
Comment
194
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
10-04-19 03:14am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
195
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
Reply of
flashman21's Review
I really like Kari but I could never quite bring myself to pay $30 for this site. There are plenty of other sites where she has appeared naked.
It's one of those sites where if it was $10 or less I would happily sign up to download her photosets but at $30 I'll just download what I can find from free sites.
|
09-26-19 09:02am
|
Reply
196
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
yujin's Reply
That's good to hear. Thanks for the update yujin.
|
09-26-19 08:48am
|
Reply
197
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I'd be interested to know the answer on that. It just seems like a cheap attempt at gaining raffle entries to me, almost as bad as writing reviews of the same site under two different user names. If this is the standard PU has fallen to I can see myself disabling my account in the not too distant future.
|
09-25-19 10:11am
|
Reply
198
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I can read what you wrote. If I click on the visit site link on this Bare Maidens page where you have placed your review I am taken to the Bare Maidens site and not the Adult Time site therefore I think it is misleading. This is not a review of the Bare Maidens site and from what I can gather you don't have a membership at the Bare Maidens site therefore you are conning people with this review. If I'm reading a review of Bare Maidens which is a site i'm quite interested in I want to know things like the photo resolution and do they have zip downloads, are they still adding new content.
This review serves no useful purpose in my opnion and if anything reads more like a review for Adult Time and should be placed on the Adult Time page.
Maybe I'm getting cynical in my old age but putting up a review of a site you're not a member of based on a few sample videos on another site just seems like a cheap way of gaining raffle entries. Personally I've only written one review in the last year as I've got to the stage where I'm thinking what's the point when you've got certain people attempting to monopolize the raffle by churning out the same old reviews week after week of different sites in the same network.
|
09-25-19 10:02am
|
Reply
199
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
So this is not really a review of the actual Bare Maidens site then. It's just a review of a handful of sample or promo videos within Adult Time which is rather misleading in my opinion. This review should be deleted.
|
09-24-19 12:18pm
|
Reply
200
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
So do you get access to the 102,000 Bare Maidens photos through the Adult Time membership then?
|
09-24-19 10:29am
|
