| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
Definitely sexy! I know it's a cliché, but the librarian/secretary thing really works for me :)
|
05-04-12 12:22am
|
Reply
302
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Concur with lk2fireone - everyone's different and you can't really generalise. However, I do check sometimes, purely out of interest!
|
05-03-12 01:01am
|
Reply
303
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Usually novels and books for me - some non-fiction but largely science fiction novels. I find the kindle tempting, especially when I get a new heavy book that's huge - but I don't read quite enough to warrant getting one. Also, I like to keep my books, so at least for now I prefer a physical one.
|
05-01-12 05:24pm
|
Reply
304
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
This style of site is winning me over to G/B material a little... but although this particular site looks good, it focuses on teens a little too much for me - I prefer to see models who look a little older.
|
04-30-12 12:59am
|
Reply
305
|
No Rest Network
(0)
|
Reply of
owen's Comment
The irony being a bit too obvious...
|
04-28-12 06:09am
|
Reply
306
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If that question had come up last week, I'd have said 3-4 months ago - general business and trials of life have kept me from smut lately. But I broke the dry spell with a subscription to Joymii just a couple of days ago...
|
04-28-12 05:45am
|
Reply
307
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Often. The 18-21 genre isn't really my thing; I generally prefer models at least in their mid 20s. I find usually the younger models don't have the right allure/seductiveness; although where they do, I'm happy to look at sets and videos. But the young and innocent look - whether deliberate or not - doesn't really work for me.
|
04-26-12 02:55am
|
Reply
308
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
It's not something I'm too worry about either way. I was going to say revisit, but actually pat326's points are very valid - a long older thread can be clumsy to navigate; and also, we are a fickle bunch so it's good to think about things again in a new light, and with the input of newer members.
|
04-25-12 01:57am
|
Reply
309
|
Orgasms.xxx
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Elephant, this site is on my radar too, and I just checked the other billing processors available from their join page. Epoch is also £24.95, but Segpay seems to let you join at $24.95.
For now I've signed up at Joymii so won't join here just yet - but agree that the material looks good and the $ price is realistic.
|
04-25-12 01:54am
|
Reply
310
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Sadly no feedback from them, elephant. However, I did somehow manage to subscribe at $19.95! I don't know how, I tried again and the CCBill form showed me $. After subscribing, I tried again and it was back to £. YMMV...
|
04-25-12 01:51am
|
Reply
311
|
Orgasms.xxx
(0)
|
Reply of
reallyuseful's Reply
Hi reallyuseful - thanks for the reply, it's good to see another webmaster here, and useful to know why the two sites exist.
However, do you have any thoughts on elephant's earlier query about the regional pricing on orgasms.xxx? I don't stress much over a small discrepancy, but the site is $25, but £25 when joining in the UK. That's an increase of 50-60%, which is a bit much to swallow!
|
04-24-12 04:47pm
|
Reply
312
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
As others - I've had excellent service with quick replies; noncommittal ones that don't really help; and sites where I've received no reply at all. All depends on the site!
|
04-21-12 01:15pm
|
Reply
313
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Abel Semen's Review
AS, thanks for testing the waters here and giving us such a good first review of this anticipated site. Although I find Met Art a bit bland, Sex Art appeals to me more - not specifically because of the extra explicitness, but because of the eroticism that I find MA lacks.
Sounds like it's worth waiting a little while for some more material - in particular, like you, I'd like to see a bit more boy-girl. Hardcore generally isn't my thing, but when it is, this is the sort of stuff I'd prefer - so meantime I may try Joymii, but Sex Art is definitely on the list.
|
04-18-12 02:31am
|
Reply
314
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm into legs and nylons, so high heels go with that - although I don't mind any footwear whatever the context. The only thing I find really daft is sex scenes where the model is entirely naked apart from high heels!
|
04-18-12 12:19am
|
Reply
315
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I guess it depends - sometimes there's some urgency involved, others I may spend a couple of hours. I don't have much time for it lately, but still try to spend an hour so so every few days catching up on what smut I've been missing...
|
04-17-12 01:52pm
|
Reply
316
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I'm figuring/hoping it's a mistake - when at the Femjoy joining page, not only does it happily offer me the $19.95 price, it also offers (actually pre-checks :|) Joymii @ $15 - or the equivalents if I change to £.
Still no reply from the webmaster, though...
|
04-17-12 10:10am
|
Reply
317
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Looks like it might actually have some eroticism, compared to Met Art - worth keeping an eye on. And glad to see Alexis Texas on there, although I'm not generally into mainstream hardcore material, I'm quite fond of her.
I note with some amusement that they are still going with the ludicrous set names of Met Art - eg Stalagmitis, Prothimo, Falos (no, really)...
|
04-16-12 09:33am
|
Reply
318
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gyang79's Comment
Met Art seems to be a very divisive site! You can't argue with the amount of material or the beauty of the models but I have to agree with you. It's not so much the level of explicitness; just that in most cases they just don't have much in the way of seductiveness or tease.
FTV is on my list; I could also recommend Breath Takers or Petites Parisiennes if you want to stick to fairly soft material but with a bit more personality; or if you want a bit more but still glam and well-produced, perhaps Digital Desire?
|
04-16-12 09:26am
|
Reply
319
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Well, I'm not quite as principled as you on the topic, Cap'n; eg your recent comment on Watch4Beauty, the couple of extra dollars is annoying but not enough to keep me from subscribing - the $15 PU price is already good, so I'm not complaining too much about it being $17.
In this case, though, equating $ with £ is too much...
|
04-16-12 09:20am
|
Comment
320
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
|
04-16-12 03:50am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
321
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Agree with Drooler - I'm sort of interested in them as objects, I appreciate well-made and well-engineered things. But concur that I can know what I need to from watching US TV programmes!
Have tried clay shooting a few times, but otherwise have not fired a pistol or rifle. Confess I might be interested to try at a range or something - but even if it were legal here in the UK, I don't think a gun is something I need or want in my house. I do have an airsoft replica of Robocop's gun, though :)
|
04-13-12 01:19am
|
Reply
322
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'd say the hand too... but with the right stimulatory environment - notably when sharing the experience with a partner. Alternatively said partner's own hand makes a good second choice...
|
04-05-12 12:33am
|
Reply
323
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
CT, how are you enjoying using Linux? I use various kinds for work as servers (and actually Mac OS is not too dissimilar, being Unix) and use Ubuntu on my netbook for casual use, but haven't used it yet as a day-to-day OS.
I'm a huge fan of the Linux, given that it is free as in both beer and speech. I like to think it's a very viable OS for many folk and am hugely peeved that it is essentially impossible to buy a computer without paying MS for Windows, even if you have no intention of using it.
|
04-03-12 01:42am
|
Reply
324
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
gpl - although as noted I'm growing a bit disenfranchised with Apple, it's a bit unfair to complain about the price of Mac OS! Granted we pay a hefty premium to use it in the first place in the form of expensive hardware, but that's the choice we make. Thereafter, OS upgrades have always been cheaper than Windows, and the latest, Lion, is about £20.
A shame you had problems with porn, though - thus far I've had no issues on Mac OS... but glad you are still enjoying smut on Windows :)
|
04-03-12 01:39am
|
Reply
325
|
N/A
|
Reply of
t9chome's Reply
Current Mac OS is Lion - iOS is the OS for the iPhone and iPad - as opposed to Mac OS, which is for desktop/laptop computers. iOS is a walled garden, with all apps having to be approved by Apple, which is a mixed blessing. Mac OS is gradually going in that direction, which I'm not keen on...
|
04-03-12 01:35am
|
