Put it into a generic new stuff holding folder - will peruse/enjoy it there, throw out anything I don't want to keep - then file it by site within a week or so.
Agree with pat as to age; I'm in my 40s and find girls in their late 20s/30s/40s more appealing than younger girls - both in porn and in real life.
As to looking... I don't consider myself a leerer, and don't look (too) lustfully - but I do appreciate an attractive woman, especially if well-dressed - by which I mean confident, comfortable, wearing something befitting, as opposed to any specific outfit.
I guess it depends on the country - there are many which would like to control it, along with other aspects of the internet. However, it's a big business, and generates tax revenue... so hopefully it will never get too bad.
Atrapat, thanks for the detailed review - this is a site which I am way overdue joining, since Mosh is absolutely my favourite model; I generally like variety and haven't joined any solo model sites - but hers will definitely be the exception.
Luckily, 'latex fetish, stockings, garters, vintage clothes, burlesque or pin up style' definitely ARE my thing! Having seen a lot of her stuff, I agree that she likely has a fair input into her shoots, since they do have a unique style all her own.
Interesting that, although with a fair number of cons, you have scored this so highly - I guess her look and style count for a lot!
Entirely brilliant opening line in Spencer's TBP review today:
‘Brutal Fisting is up for review today, and I don't know if there's technically a distinction between brutal and non-brutal fisting, since most fisting seems pretty brutal to me, but there you have it.’
Fisting really isn't my thing, but that kind of writeup does bring a smile to my face...
Hmm... don't mind either way - I guess I sort of prefer brunettes, but not so much that it heavily sways me one way or the other. So it can be interesting to see a change on a model I like.
Hmm... I just chose B since there is no all option. I don't mind - other things are far more important! I'm happy with A or E :) Perhaps not *much* larger than that, though...
Any or all of the above - but I guess fantasy is the main thing - letting us look at women, and imagine being with them, in ways that are unlikely to happen in real life.
However, I'd also add another option - inspiration - it's rare to have the chance, but when looked at with a willing partner, it inspires some ideas/scenarios...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Attractive, mostly natural models
- Good mix of US/European models, broad-ish age range
- Clean, modern design
- Videos and photos come in matching updates
- Consistent updates - 2 photosets + 2 videos per week
- Modern, tasteful, interior locations
- Atmospheric, well lit and creatively shot videos
- Some cute interviews
- At least as yet, no anal material (could be a con for some)
- 4 sizes of pictures, up to 5K+
- Quality improving
Cons:
- Needs better filtering options
- Regional pricing
- Would like to see a few asian/ethnic models
- Some fake boobs
- Site too AJAXy - a bit glitchy with back etc
- Volume resets to max for each video
- Picture sets lose something that the videos have
- Video is 720; some folk may want 1080
Bottom Line:
This site is a bit of a departure for me - I'm usually into softcore photography but every so often I have a hankering for a bit more action. However, I prefer something a little more... arty is the wrong word, because we're still talking about smut here - but perhaps balanced. There are a few of these contemporary, tasteful (again, previous comment applies) sites around now, such as X Art - I went for Joymii since at least to me it somehow seemed to have a bit more character, and focused less on the 18-21 models, I prefer a broader range.
A roundup of the content: this is hardcore/midcore content; a mixture of solo, GG and GB scenes. Each scene has one movie update - generally about 10 minutes, available in a few formats up to 720p - and one photo update, consisting approx 50-70 pics, a good online viewer and 4 sizes of zips up to 5K or so. Updates come fairly consistently at about 2 pairs per week, and there are approx 150 of each, featuring perhaps 70 models. The models are both US and European, with many popular girls - the former including Holly Michaels, Marie Macray, Dani Daniels, Shyla Jennings, Karlie Montana, Celeste Star (a favourite); the latter including Caprice, Eufrat, Ariel, Connie (Josephine here, another favourite).
The site itself is generally good - although note it has regional pricing; $20=£20 does not compute. It's odd since sister site Femjoy doesn't seem to; either way, I was somehow able to circumvent that - I have no idea how! The form just suddenly decided to offer me the $ price. Once joined up, the site has a clean, contemporary design; which actually hides a few shortcomings. It's a bit too AJAX-heavy (pages which change without the actual URL changing), which leads to glitchy back button behaviour and the like. Links time out so if you have a page open for a while you need to refresh for the download link to work. The filtering is also quite lacking; the only real choices being 'Popular' and '2-3 some' - the latter including B/G and G/G material, which for some folk is quite a big distinction; it could do with a few more options there.
What sets this site apart, though, is the quality of the videos. Although they don't go up to 1080p, they are really sharp; but over and above that, they are just so well done. Gone are the gaudy colours of most porn; these are well lit, bright, but muted and subtle. The videos usually start off with a little music; it's fairly unobtrusive and fades out after a few minutes. The camera angles are often creative and interesting; lending a bit more context to the scene; showing closeups where necessary - but not necessarily of the obvious bits, but better for it!
The locations too are good - I don't mean to come across all metrosexual, but I find the interiors (not *those* interiors) in most porn really offputting; all those chintzy bedspreads, or faux-deluxe regency-type interiors... here we have bright, spacious rooms, nice contemporary furniture, lots of natural light. And similarly, although the models tend to be naked more often than not, where they do undress the clothes are nice, casual and flattering - nothing tacky or faux-glam.
None of which gets in the way of the explicitness - there's plenty to see, but the hardcore is done to make both partners seem to genuinely equally enjoy it; if you had a likeminded partner, this is something that's easily couples-friendly to watch. And on top of all that, they seem to be getting better at it; the newer videos have more character, and although they still use toys, they are relying less on them than the earlier videos.
On the other hand, the photos, although I can't quite put my finger on it, are missing something. Technically they are good - the same locations, models etc, sharp pictures, well-lit and high resolution. But somehow they don't have the same atmosphere; they don't have the same creative angles, selective focus and closeups that the videos do. For instance, I like a bit of context, something that helps put myself in the scene - in one video the model is masturbating while on a steamy phone call, it's very exciting; the corresponding picture set features the same model, outfit, location; but no phone, and mainly just posing for the camera. The photos are obviously shot separately from the videos; I just feel they could could bring a bit more to them. But again, they are technically good and I found plenty to keep.
This, then, is an easy one to score, agreeing with both TBP and the previous reviewers; although let down on a few small fronts, I really like the content, and I may well be a convert to the genre. Suspect I shall find myself at Orgasms.xxx sometime soon!
It's hard to tell from the previews, but it looks like Layered Nylons might at least have models with nothing under sheer nylon - which actually really works for me, as much as nude.
There's also Art Lingerie which is nude - I find the preview material a little too glossed over but it's tentatively on my list...
I think at least some of the sites show a little more? Eg Only Secretaries shows some toplessness on their home page, but I'm not sure if it goes any than that. I love teasing but agree that it would be frustrating if we didn't get to see some naughty bits eventually...
Big monitors are always better... luckily they are much cheaper than they used to be. I have a 22" 1920x1080 which can be had for not much more than £100.
Having said that, I'm looking forward to forthcoming high-res monitors, along the lines of what you see in the new iPad, which fits a 27" resolution into 10" - but I suspect at a price...
Just saw this newly listed at TBP and it's intriguing. I'm definitely a nylon fan, and IMO the more layers the better... as long as they come off eventually!
I've never been tempted by OT - I like the T but I think I'd find the O merely frustrating. Would be interesting to see how explicit this site is and whether it leaves us wanting... just a shame the preview is fairly poor compared to the other OT sites, there is little sample material to see.
If they are unobtrusive and for other sites in the network, it's OK. But others are annoying - especially those with popups (whether for the same network or not).
This site seems to have been down for a while, so I guess should be delisted. A shame, since, despite it being infuriating, it featured some genuinely original and erotic material.
I'll say a few weeks - work kept me pretty busy the first few months of this year and I didn't join any sites for a few months; and only occasionally checked out one I have a year's membership to.
Spending a little more time on it again now though...
Just spotted this listed at TBP, and it's the kind of subtle, atmospheric, a bit-arty-but-explicit material that I really like. The site still seems small at the moment with only a few sets and videos, but if it grows, it's definitely one I'll join. Until then, however, Angel Afterlife is higher up on my list...
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
