| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Email - for what it's worth. I've had more sites not reply than do.
|
07-15-12 01:43am
|
Comment
252
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
|
07-15-12 01:42am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Doesn't do it for me. I quite like scenes with some context, a bit voyeuristic... but the activity needs to have some erotic intent. Watching yoga is just a bit too H&E to be exciting...
|
07-13-12 03:08am
|
Reply
254
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Reply
They can - we buy porn and stuff on eBay, Amazon etc in $ using a £ credit card; the merchant gets the same, and the bank converts it using their own exchange rate.
It's just sites like this that see we are in the UK and decide to charge £29.95 instead of $29.95 - it's entirely their call. Grr. Etc.
|
07-12-12 03:44pm
|
Comment
255
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
|
07-12-12 12:39am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Not really - as others have said, 3D cinema does absolutely nothing for me at all, other than drain my wallet a bit quicker.
However, the kind of technology that hodayathink suggests... well, that would be something else :)
|
07-12-12 12:30am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
If I was the one doing it, then in her pussy would be the first choice for me. However, as for porn, there can be some value in seeing it; so my next choice would be belly - it seems the next most intimate option.
|
07-06-12 12:17am
|
Comment
258
|
Andrew Blake
(0)
|
|
07-05-12 02:20am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
259
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
|
07-05-12 01:51am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Hmm - I guess we need multiple options; having said that, although I work in IT, I'm not much of a gadget freak.
I'll get a new phone when there's an Android 4 one that looks good; all else will survive the year although I'm planning to put an SSD in my computer.
|
07-03-12 12:08am
|
Reply
261
|
Orgasms.xxx
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Slutty, thanks for the helpful and informative review - this site is high on my list, so it good to read a bit more about it.
Despite the smaller size, I still think I'm leaning toward it more than to X-Art - mainly because Orgasms seems to have a broader age range of models, as opposed to X-Art's apparent heavy bias of 18-21.
As I mentioned to rearadmiral - if you like these sites, you may also want to try Joymii - another simiar site which I really enjoyed and reviewed recently.
|
07-01-12 05:02pm
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I chose less brutal - hopefully some of the more extreme stuff is behind us and we are seeing more sites that cater to couples, which is a good thing. However, as it becomes more mainstream, it may start to homogenise, which would be a shame for niche material...
|
07-01-12 02:27am
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I tend to quickly scan set thumbnails on the site, then download what I like the look of. Suspect I delete about 20% thereafter.
|
07-01-12 02:24am
|
Reply
264
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Again, the last - most of us here read reviews and will lean toward the sites with better video, navigation and updating. And even if these are lacking, if the material is right, they can be lived with. But finding something genuinely new... that's why I was so enthused by Juliland - one of those rare sites that's a breath of fresh air.
|
06-27-12 01:55am
|
Reply
265
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
No problem. I find TheNude a good site for looking up models - in this case their search easily found Tiffany:
http://www.thenude.eu/Tiffany_19467.htm
Hopefully that's the right one! You'll find lots of other sites with her - although they don't seem to have Joymii there yet.
|
06-26-12 12:25am
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most of the time, yes; I've got about 3 physically identical drives used for different thing; the smut one is euphemistically labelled 'Data' :|
|
06-25-12 12:04am
|
Reply
267
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review RA, glad you liked the site. I've not joined it yet, but I was recently at Joymii which is very similar, you may want to check it out too. I went for it over X-Art since they seem to have a slightly broader age range of models - the large majority at X-Art seem to be 18-21. I also really like the colour, angles and general videography at Joymii; it's creative, but still explicit.
Still, based on your review, it definitely looks like this is worth a join too!
|
06-25-12 12:02am
|
Reply
268
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
CT, you are getting a reputation for missing the common answer - in this case 10-50 - perhaps it's deliberate? :)
|
06-24-12 01:28am
|
Reply
269
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Agree with Claypaws - show us the content if you want to prove you're different. I try to join only sites which show all updates etc - basically which give you the same browsing ability as members just without the actual downloads.
|
06-20-12 01:42am
|
Reply
270
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Messmer, thanks for a helpful review - this site remains firmly on my to-try list, being a fan of both retro underwear and lewd talk - I don't know of any good sites with the former, let alone both! I also especially like the broad age range of models here.
Useful to know the few cons and it would be good to find a site which was perhaps a bit slicker - but they are not enough to dissuade me!
|
06-18-12 03:15am
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
All the above! Also, for me, that it is so closely tied in with TBP - we can see the official stats and review there, then just click through here to comment, review etc.
|
06-17-12 02:42am
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've done it a couple of times, I think; I do tend to check facts of sites I join on TBP, so if I see something I know to be incorrect, I'll submit a report...
|
06-15-12 09:01am
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
As others have said, all of them. I find colour and lighting particularly important; having recently been a member of Joymii, I found their soft, muted colours and natural light a breath of fresh air compared to the studio lights and harsh colour of most porn.
I actually chose cropping though - I think to some of the pictures I find really evocative, and it's particular angles and close ups that the photographer has done. I like to see the whole picture and don't demand gynecological detail; but focusing on a stocking top, the edge of a bra, the model's lips or eyes - they can be very intimate and exciting details.
|
06-13-12 11:45am
|
Reply
274
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
This is a network I've been tempted by, since I'm quite keen on nylons - but it is, as pat362 mentioned, very expensive. It also looks a bit samey, perhaps? I like something a bit different - perhaps something a bit artsy... but not at the expense of explicitness.
|
06-12-12 11:17am
|
Reply
275
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, but nothing more than the one built into the browser... no specific ad blockers.
|
06-12-12 11:11am
|
