| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It depends on the content. Photos I can take or leave; videos, if it shows the personality of the model (assuming they have one!) then I think it lends to the appreciation of their sets/videos. For this reason, I especially like interviews with the models; they have some good ones at Petites Parisiennes, and some great chat-show type ones at Juliland.
A couple of folk have said it's OK in addition to, rather than instead of, normal content. Surely that's very subjective on the site and the frequency - eg if a site updates daily, with 2 BTS updates a week, is that good or bad?
|
01-18-12 12:11pm
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I've got two which I use online and can remember the number for both of them... although I always have to check the expiry date, so I guess I miss the point :|
|
01-14-12 05:53am
|
Reply
203
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd rather there weren't limits, but I'll accept them if I like the site enough (and I'm unlikely to reach them anyway).
It depends on the content as to what the limits should be; if it's enough to comfortably get what I want from a site within the month, I don't mind.
Eg when a member of Girls Out West, the newer movies are huge, some I think 6GB or more; a 20GB limit there could stop me downloading a few in one go which I might want to.
OTOH, for a photo site, sets may be 100-200Mb; a 20GB limit would let me download 100 sets in a day - which I am unlikely to do. There I'd accept a 10GB limit.
|
01-11-12 12:51am
|
Reply
204
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As others have said, it's more likely the bad experiences which will put you off, rather than the other way around.
If I need to ask something before joining a site, then the reply, if any, from the webmaster will certainly affect that, as it will affect rejoining if I had an issue while a member.
The one site I visit consistently, though, is Petites Parisiennes - very largely because the webmaster is helpful and affable; answers all queries and responds to - and often acts upon - all suggestions via the forum.
Having said that, If I didn't get a reply from a webmaster, but I knew the site actually worked and I liked the content, I would probably rejoin. I'm pragmatic if nothing else...
|
01-11-12 12:46am
|
Reply
205
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Good call slutty.
I was going to say no, since it doesn't work for me at all. Perhaps because we (at least I) like to imagine the models as somehow attainable; suspension of disbelief is key, but seeing her pregnant stretches the point a bit much :|
But if it were my own partner, then I'm sure I'd be quite happy to, er, dive in.
|
01-05-12 05:10am
|
Reply
206
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan, thanks for the helpful reply! Of course I understand that the goal here is to promote and inform about actual sites, and so site-specific activity is encouraged.
As such, I didn't particularly expect forum participation to count - so I guess it's just a bonus that poll replies - such as this one ;) - do!
|
01-04-12 11:40pm
|
Reply
207
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only when I have something to contribute to a particular subject (or at least I think I have something!).
Just as an aside, I wonder why forum participation doesn't qualify for a raffle ticket. I can see how site-specific contribution does, such as reviews and comments - but if eg adding trust ratings and poll replies do, shouldn't forum posts also?
|
01-04-12 11:09am
|
Reply
208
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not really sure what kind of site we are talking about. I like some non-nude material - especially fetishwear, pinups and the like, a well-conceived lingerie or latex set can be much sexier than a poorly conceived nude one. But I'm not sure that qualifies as Amateur - maybe I'm missing something...
|
12-31-11 09:15am
|
Reply
209
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Probably less. Although I don't spend too much time on smut, it's part of a routine, and that routine is altered over the holidays, so I end up doing other stuff.
|
12-28-11 07:47am
|
Reply
210
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As per Cap'n, not really my cup of tea (although tea isn't my cup of tea either)- It's a bit too extreme for my tastes.
I almost went for the next option, because although I'm interested in and very tolerant of what turns folk on, I feel that as it becomes more mainstream - (or at least less fringe than it once was) models will feel pressured into doing something that they are not at all OK with and could actually hurt them :|
|
12-26-11 05:24am
|
Reply
211
|
N/A
|
Reply of
bacardiancoke's Reply
Once again, bacardiancoke has echoed my sentiments. Maybe a membership a new year present would be better!
|
12-24-11 06:30am
|
Reply
212
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Exactly as bacardiancoke said.
I suspect most of us join most sites for just a month and so the backlist of material is far more of a draw than whatever turns up during that month. It hasn't happened yet, but I'd happily join a non-updating site if it has material I like.
|
12-22-11 01:25am
|
Reply
213
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
VLC (Mac) - Plays everything!
|
12-20-11 01:14am
|
Reply
214
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not sure if I can call on it being cheating or not - I don't think so, my best reply is to agree with Cybertoad that it's ideologically the same as going to a lapdancing bar - whatever you think about the strippers there, then spending time with cam models is no more or less cheating than that.
|
12-18-11 10:26am
|
Reply
215
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Hmm... I said 'Yes and I have' since I won $100 in one of the first draws I had tickets - I just had 4 I think.
Sadly, since then, I've been rather unlucky... it looks like on average, most folk who enter regularly have won $1/ticket entered... I'm on less than half that.
I know, grumpy old man etc :)
|
12-14-11 12:24am
|
Reply
216
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
How about Velma from Scooby Doo... or, of course Wilma Flintstone - that figure. Betty's OK, but in the words of the Cat from Red Dwarf... 'I'd go with Betty, but I'd be thinking of Wilma'.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKy8CzX4TEU
|
12-12-11 12:51am
|
Reply
217
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Fairly similar, I guess - I mainly only join softcore sites but within that I'll go for more standard erotic nudes, legs/nylons and mild fetishwear.
Probably not as broad a spectrum as some PUers...
|
12-06-11 12:23am
|
Reply
218
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
720 or 1080 works fine for me. I use a 1920x1080 monitor, so 1080 is good for full screen - but I do agree with elephant that in many cases you don't see a difference between the two. However, given that that video survives some upscaling, even when we are using the next generation of higher-res monitors, 1080 vids should still look good full screen, so I usually go for those.
|
12-04-11 02:19am
|
Reply
219
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Just as long as you have better dress sense than Daffyd...
|
12-02-11 02:29am
|
Reply
220
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said face, but for me it's actually eyes - a lascivious look is what really turns me on moreso than any body part...
|
12-02-11 02:25am
|
Reply
221
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Hmm... actually, I think I agree with Slutty about the pussy (only if I had to choose, mind).
I've watched a little censored Japanese porn lately and it's really starting to grate; I find the scenes where the nudity or action is not quite seen far more arousing than the bits where we see everything but censored.
So I could manage without the pussy... I do have a fondness for photosets that fetishise other body parts, though; breasts, lips, neck etc.
|
11-20-11 11:42pm
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As others have said, not remotely interested! I guess celebs have to expect to be, er, exposed to the public eye; I just don't get why the public find it so fascinating.
|
11-20-11 11:37pm
|
Reply
223
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Well, I guess on one hand it's just a job... but the really enjoyable moments come from those who have pride in their job and do it to please and entertain the viewer.
I have a lot of respect for anyone who takes that approach, regardless of the work; I hope that for most porn performers feel that way.
|
11-20-11 11:35pm
|
Reply
224
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never - everything's on an external drive, if I want to watch on the big screen I can just plug it into the PS3 and play from there.
|
11-12-11 06:03am
|
Reply
225
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I concur - I'm more than happy for something - or some remnant of something - to remain on while the action proceeds.
Otherwise, various combinations work and it depends what fully dressed means. I like to see a strip and tease, but if there's some context to the scene and at least an attempt at plausibility, then starting with less is fine.
|
11-11-11 07:06am
|
