Interesting find. I'm guessing that my new review just superseded my old one and that everybody can only have one review of a site. So if you search by site, you only see one review. If you search by user, you see both.
Down blouse. Here's the logic.
To me, this question is about voyeurism and the typical and eternal male associated desire to see the shape of a woman's breasts. It is primal. Whether you realize it or not, you look at a fully clothed woman's chest, in spite of not actually being able to see anything, to get an idea of the size and shape of her boobs. It is some kind of natural selection thing. And the thrill, since puberty, is to be able to do that without the girl noticing. Upskirts are a totally different category and not a practical voyeur activity. Nipslips are not really a voyeuristic thing at all, just a person at the right place at the right time. Sideboob and underboob can be voyeuristic, but for those, the girl is proobably already trying to be revealing. The downblouse is the mother of all opportunities to check out the shape of a female breast with the potential for her not to realize you are looking.
I think it is funny that the fashion industry has developed push-up bras that actually make breasts harder to see, but they have made it acceptable to wear G-strings to avoid panty lines, all while making women far more uncomfortable then they were in the bra-less, white cotton bikini underwear 70's. How dumb is that?
I think "Any computer game" is kind of a cop out. There are computer games to play when idle, like on a flight, games to play when you want to be social and games to play when you want to play a good game. And there are SO many good iPad/tablet games...my favorite changes just about monthly.
Similar to Rearadmiral. Right now I have about 8 memberships, I think. 4 annual ones, a couple of 2-3-times-a-year memberships and several to sites I have not joined before that I was curious about. Normally, it is 3 annual and 1-2 others at a time.
I have a hard time watching TV these days because everything is so contrived. The newer US comedies are pretty dumb and the serious stuff is easy to guess the formula or keep a move or two ahead of the plot (or cops). So if I have to watch TV, I'll watch BBC America, which, believe it or not, has a few unique shows on it that either follow a different formula or put the US in a less nationalistic perspective. Even the comedy is sometimes better (Graham Norton is probably the best talk show on TV because of the multi-guest dialog and because the actor-guests often get drunk!) ..or I will watch stuff on.....the Sci-Fi channel. If I am going to throw all reality out the window to watch some stupid american show where they don't know not to walk down dark, occupied alleys or how to use cell phones, then I may as well throw all reality out the window and watch something where everybody is in space or far in the future. Hard to say "That's dumb" to a sci-fi show since it is all 100% fake to begin with.
Yeah, the idea of a non-porn but very porn-like movie is a little oxymoronic to me. There are some movies with good scenes in them, yes, or movies with hot, popular female actors that get naked in them, yes, but it is hard to pick a best, so here's a list of..um...memorable scenes. Let's start with Sin City. The girl you want to see naked, Jessica Alba, isn't. But the other nude scenes, including ultra-hot Carla Gugino, in this movie are really excellent even if they aren't sex scenes. Dead Calm features a very, very young Nicole Kidman in a scene that is pretty good even if it isn't fully nude. In the Wrestler, there is a strip club scene with Marisa Tomei that stands out. The sex scene with Eva Green in 300: Rise of an Empire is not bad (She's had a few interesting scenes in movies.). Heck, even Risky Business has a pretty good scene in it with Rebecca De Mornay and Tom Cruise. ....so no top movie. Lot's of good scenes that I would watch a movie again for, though. Thank god for Tivo!
I see a lot of pretty good promo videos for "mysislovesme.com", where the horny stepsister gets laid. They look interesting because the girls in the promos are hot and the interaction with the camera is almost POV. There is some pretty good dialog, too.
Here's my test of a good video. First, turn off the sound. Now watch the first half of the video. If you have a hard-on at that point, go ahead and watch the rest with the sound on. The "taboo" premise is never as important as a videos ability to grab you.
After realizing I usually have a membership to one of the sites on this network, I went ahead and bought the upgrade for permanent access to the entire network for $69. Unfortunately, the upgrade does not provide me with the ability download many of the top rated set videos or images, just watch them...not really what I signed up for. I tried contacting thier tech support about this, but got no response back from anybody.
I'll follow up and let you know if it ever gets resolved.
Follow-Up - 10-18-16:
The limited download option has been resolved somehow. I can now download any video within the network.
The first full frontal nude centerfold in Playboy was Marilyn Cole, Miss February 1972. This magazine vanished from my older brother's porn stash and formed the foundation or mine.
I have some really old some from college. Things like the "Oh god, she's nude!" Vanessa Williams Penthouse. It is stored in the bottom of a box someplace and once in a while I stumble upon it, look through it, wonder what to do with it, put it back and forget about it again until the next time.
You should probably talk about anything OTHER than shop. In fact, let them take the conversation wherever they want to.
I met Raquel Darrian at a non-porn related party in LA hosted by the Major Video rental chain (they rented a lot of porn videos before they were purchased by blockbuster...this was about 1992, I think). Her then-boyfriend Derrick was with her. Although I knew who they were, I went out of my way not to talk shop with them, partially because this was not a porn industry event, it was a video industry event. Funny thing...I ran into her about a year later in a Fort Lauderdale strip club and she remembered me...not my name, but she remembered where we met before. She was headlining there that night and one of my vendors had brought me to this club. Derrick was with her, and they sat at my table for a while so they could stay on the floor without having to work it. Again, we talked about anything but shop.
I have annual subscriptions to 3 of my favorite sites and have had them for a couple of years now. I still poke around and subscribe to other sites, but not as much as I used to. Those three sites each provide multiple daily updates and that keeps me fairly satisfied.
I understand where you are coming from, but I don't think you can compare softcore modeling or even European porn to mainstream US porn. Very few models make the transition to hardcore easily because the traits needed for the two are different. Those who do make the transition may simply be starting in softcore with a plan to move on as they gain popularity. Also, European and some american nude models make a shitload of money, probably as much as or more than US porn stars do. Sidney Moon started with Playboy, made a lot of money modeling and was able to retire without going into porn videos (although she did a couple of girl/girl videos back in the Danni's Hotbox days.) Marketa Belonoha never did a single porn or girl/girl scene, often had two shootings a day and retired fairly wealthy in her early 30s.
There are a lot of European models that have done what I'll call European porn but will probably never progress beyond sex with their real life boyfriends on-screen. Connie Carter, often seen in Met-Art is a good example of that. There are also a lot of softcore models that are lesbians and won't do boy/girl sex scenes. This gets back to the traits thing I spoke of earlier. (i.e. Sydney, I think.)
So, my point is that nobody HAS to progress to freaky porn to be successful. There are plenty of very, very successful nude models that don't and plenty of their followers who appreciate it.
There are many girls in this industry that know exactly how to manage their careers, but there are also a lot of girls who have no idea what they are getting into. It seems like many of the girls make the decisions about what to do, but it also seems like in some cases others make the decisions for them. My point is that I'm not sure if the start easy and get progressively more hard core is a planned thing, or if the girl just progresses from nude modeling to porn acting to progressively nastier stuff because those around her are telling her that's what she needs to be doing.
I am NOT saying that this is an exploitation thing, but it is interesting how the pattern so closely mimics exploitation that you often would not be able to tell if it was or not.
Personally, I am not into the really freak stuff. I like the model sites and straight porn with a POV perspective...a little bondage occasionally. Anal, DP and brutality are huge turn-offs to me...probably because I could never do those things in the bedroom and would never want to treat a woman that way. (Seriously, have you ever had a long term relationship with a woman who likes Anal? Do you know any woman that truly likes it? Porn is not about getting off, it is about getting YOU off.) So I don't want my favorite porn girls to be doing too much of the truly freaky stuff...ever!
Most porn stars make truly awful noises during sex, foreign or not, so the volume is off when I watch them. There are a few exceptions when the girl is talking to the camera, but not many.
If you look around enough, you will see almost every porn actress or model out there in both girl-girl and girl-guy scenes. So they may have a sexual preference, but it does not impact their ability to have sex with whoever the scene calls for. I do think that the industry tends to have a lot of bi girls.
Depends on the porn star. Some, like Savannah (Shannon Wilsey) from the late 80's-early 90's, have particularly graphic and unfortunate stories leading up to their deaths or suicides. Knowing the stories tends to shrivel one's enthusiasm. But if they had long, successful, relatively happy careers and died of something unrelated, then here's to remembering them in the best possible way!
Porn Awards....kind of an oxymoron. Porn is privately watched by many, but, at least here in the hypocritical US, publicly shunned. (It's OK to shoot somebody on TV, but you can't see a boob because that would be porn!) How stupid and unhealthy. The value of the award is high within the industry, I suppose, but outside the industry, what, there are awards?? Because of this, it has to be because the fans, who will nearly always remain nameless, really appreciate or enjoy the work or the look or the unique talent that a porn model or porn star has. This is the weirdest industry on the planet....but I do see an opportunity for an independent, poll based industry award...THE PORN USER AWARDS!
I signed up for naked gymnast and was surprised to see watermarks that said flexyteen. So I went to Flexyteen and was able to log in with me NG account info. EXACT same site! The only difference was the text across the top of the 1999 web page. I would have been really pissed if I had signed up for both. See my review under Naked Gymnast.
Yes, for most sites I only sign up for a month at a time, but I have annual subscriptions to a few. You are right about some sets not being that exciting, but I like the format because you can truly see what each model looks like without any stupid props, covered tattoos, airbrushing or clothing designed to hide things. Every single model is real and most are stunning. It isn't up in your face stuff very often and is mostly pretty soft core, but once a week or so there is a set that knocks my...um...socks off.
I just followed the link to this site and am wondering what is wrong with this site;s webmasters. My first clue is that nearly all of the "top models" are from 2010 and before. Then when I clicked on model of the month, January and February 2016 are blank...then when I clicked on "all models of the month", it shows 2009, 2010 and then skips to an all-blank 2016. 5 years missing? And links to "more about this model" are broken. This is on the model teaser page? Really? This is not the type of thing that inspires me to join.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
