With most girls, a little makeup is a good thing. I absolutely can't stand the bright color or rainbow eye shadow common in Eastern European countries. Makes a girl look like a clown.
If I find a model particularly attractive, I will move all her stuff into my OMG folder, regardless of name. There are about 10 girls in there now out of about 200,000.
I don't really have TVs. I have A/V setups in 3 rooms with A/V recievers, Tivos, stream-capable Blu-Ray players, and game consoles. One setup is a dedicated A/V room with the setup bove, plus a PC, a projector and 12 foot projection screen.
The problem with TV and TV related services is that they are too clean. I can get PPV porn on any hotel TV, but not in my own home because Amazon and the other mainstream vendors won't carry it. Huge, huge, HUGE market opportunity when you consider what VCRs did for the industry.
Eh, it's more about the ability of the photography team than the location. Well..Although outdoors is usually fine, I'm not thrilled with the girl in the woods shoots where she pretends there is no photographer present or is partially hidden behind a tree.
A good photographer with a good model, good technique and a good demeaner with that model can successfully shoot anywhere.
I was in Vegas several years ago for business and the hotel was hosting some kind of porn convention. Can't recall what it was...maybe Vivid. Everybody had lanyards and badges, but I was able to walk right in because I had a lanyard and badge from my covention...nobody really looks at the things. Lots of toys, dolls, porn stars, etc. Remember Raquel Darrian? She was there. That pegs the timeframe. '92 maybe?
I am all for legalization and taxation at both the state and federal level. It would help the economy and allow the DEA to go after the heavy hitters dealing with the really bad stuff. Bot...
The only concern I have is the impact this would have on kids. For drinking, laws are strict and the impact of small amounts of alcohal on the development of kids brains is generally minimal (as proven by studies and by European countries that allow kids to drink). Don't bash me, but I am not convinced that pot does not have an impact on the development of young brains. As a kid in the 1970's I was 11 when I started smokong pot and was pretty much done with it by college. I do think it had an adverse affect on me. As a kid, I did not delineate much between pot and marginally more dangerous drugs like coke (the snorting kind back then, thank god), speed and quaaludes. (Adults, with a more developed sense of reason, can probably understand the difference and not leap to other drugs.) I also think legalization might make it easier for kids to get weed, especially if it were a common thing around the house (purses, top drawers, etc). Alcohol laws prevent an adult from giving alcahol to a minor, but do not prohibit kids from raiding the liquor cabinet and do not encourage parents to lock up the booze. And as somebody above mentioned, unlike alcohol, second hand pot smoke is still effective at giving somebody, kids included, a buzz.
So, although I'm in favor of it, there would need to be several safeguards in place that I'm not sure are there yet. Some combination of both alcahol and tobacco policies would need to be implemented.
The only non-digital I have could be considered collector stuff, "Oh God, She's Nude!" and similar, hidden away in a dusty box I last saw about a year ago. The best of my digital stuff, dating back more than 15 years now, is on a protected hard drive on one of 3 computers in the man cave. Older stuff and archives are on protected external drives stored away. Like any data, you can't exactly call it valuable, but it is worth backing up because it would be very expensive or impossible to replace.
To each his/her own, I guess. When I look at a beautiful girl on a good site, at least one thought I have is how nice it would be to go down on her until she cums and says stop. But after seeimg a few shots of peeing, that thought vanishes. Now..on the other hand...I have been told that one of the reasons there is soo much pee on the lesbian sites is because the photographers are tellig the girls to imagine themselves peeing on the tens of thousands of guys who are getting off seeing them naked. So if you see a girl peeing, she was probably fantasizing about peeing on YOU!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very good quality videos
Decent sized collection
Dates back to 2007
Almost entirely young (under 20), petite, slender attractive models (no unibrows, etc....some eastern block teeth, though.)
Several popular European models from when they were younger
Most models are shaved but a few are trimmed or full.
Every update is dated
"Bonus" videos from other sites like Wet and Puffy
Cons:
The site IS updating, but only one small addition once a week.
When updates occurred before, they were once or twice a week but were very small. one video segment from a larger set, just screen caps, just photos, etc.
A few choice photo sets, like one of Caprice, have broken links.
Some MPG/WMV videos are actually avi. No idea why.
No scoring of videos or sets.
No ability to tag favorites.
Downloads are very slow.
The price ($29.95 USD) seems a little steep for the content, but not outrageous.
Bottom Line:
This is another "18" site
Mostly solo but some girl/girl sets
Stripping, masturbation, penetration, some speculum, some peeing, some panty stuffing.
The name says it all. Some serious close-ups of mostly really cute, young models!
The site video content is very similar to InTheCrack.com (ITC) and it also reminded me a little bit of ALSScan.com (ALS) or First Time Videos (FTV). ITC does a lot of close-ups and ALS is almost entirely teen models. FTV is another site similar to this one except this one is almost entirely indoor shooting. The collection here is nowhere near as large as those sites, but it is larger than many other similarly priced but lower quality sites
The girls are all eastern European and several have been on other sites over the years. Caprice and several others will be easily recognized, although some have different names here. There are also many that I don't recognize from other sites. Most are quite pretty and many have that "cute" factor that is solid gold for teen sites. Sadly, as is the case with many semi-pro eastern European models, their expressions can be a little off by American standards...a little goofy, frightened or spooky. Fortunately, the majority of the videos are not focused on faces at all.
At first I thought the site had stopped updating. I think that was because navigation for the site is a little tricky. The Videos page shows recent updates but the Photos page shows mid 2015 as the most recent update. And the upate log page has not been updated since 2015. Some udpates can only be found by scrolling down on the "home" page. The page only shows 6 sets from mid-october back to September, so anything that might have been here between September of this year and July of 2015 might not be showing up anywhere. They are not updating in the update log, in models, etc. Updates are occurring about once a week and they are single videos of a larger model set, or images, or bonus content. Honestly, this is one of the most confusing sites I've seen when it comes to finding stuff.
Some quick stats:
126 models or female couples
About 725 video segments
About 25 20 meg photo sessions (1333x2000)
Screencaps for most videos
Sets date back to 2007
There is an update log (through July of 2015)
Everything is dated.
Videos come in multiple formats, usually 3 sizes. Unfortunately the format of the files is often incorrect (MP4 instead of WMV, AVI instead of MP4, etc.) The sizes are usually correct, though.
Downloads are slow. Very slow.
Navigation is pretty basic. You can view by update or by model or you can view the update page or look at the update log to see all updates through mid-2015. I have no idea why they continue to post updates on the home page, but do not add them to the log or update model info. Something is kind of messed up with that.
There is a search function, sort of, but it allows you to search by a specific attribute or video activity like anal, boobs, cervix, discharge, finger, gape, etc. Kind of odd, but it does seem to work, at least with newer videos.
One thing I like is that all of the videos include a little synopsis of what goes on in them....similar to ITC but without the check marks for the best videos.
Also, the file names seem to make sense. Girls name and segment number.
There are about 21 bonus videos from Wet and Puffy, Wet and Pissy and Nubiles.net. These are full length videos, not just teasers.
Bottom line: I'm giving this site a 77 because a) it has some really good solo girl content, but b) navigation is very basic and links are broken or mislabeled, c) the webmaster is not posting/cross referencing updates correctly, and d) downloads are very slow.
If you like "InTheCrack.com" but also have a preference for the younger models, this site might be worth a visit. Take a look at the models and know that none of them are the least bit shy.
I just joined this site for the first time and initially it looked like there are no updates since 2015. How does that happen? Well, the webmasters are posting updates on the updates page, but they are not updating their update log page or model info. So it looks like the site is not updating until you scroll down on the specific updates page.
Earliest sets are from 2007 and there are quite a few videos and photo sets of some popular Eastern European models from years past. I'll try to write a review later.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some nicely done videos
Some great looking models
Decent collection
Cons:
This is actually a referral site.
All or most of the content is from third party libraries or sites getting referrals.
Site layout and navigation is inconsistent and generally awful.
Preview page is not representative of content
Preview page makes many models look under 18 (scary)
Update 3 times a week, maybe.
Cross selling on every page. (From the sites with the content)
Bottom Line:
I've reviewed a pretty significant number of websites, So I hope the PU webmasters understand that as the consumer reports of porn, they need to watch out for misrepresentation.
At first, this seems like one of those sites that is trying to model itself in the image of WOW or W4B. The recent videos, though not exclusive, are very nicely done and follow that genre.
There is a section called DVD movies. Click on it and you are taken to an area with commercial streaming DVDs. It is a really poorly implemented area, though, because each video includes an option for HD, but generates an error when you click on HD. These are mostly old DVD from before 2008 or so, probably from a commercial re-licenser/aggregator.
Then, as you navigate through the site, there is also a large collection of videos that generally remind me of the stuff you can find on RedTube or other free sites. It is not bad, but I've seen much of it elsewhere. Funny thing...once there, you can't get back to the main page. This is because you are no longer on 18X. You are actually on a different site called Webmaster central. Another content aggregator. Another funny thing. Many of the videos have the lower corner blurred out or have been cropped to eliminate a watermark. This is probably because the aggregator bought the rights to these videos from sites that no longer exist.
But here is where the really sleazy website garbage comes in...stuff this site deserves to get slammed for. The Thai girl on the preview page named Eaw is not on the site. She can only be found by clicking on the "tour videos" link at the top. "tour videos" interesting description. I'm thinking it really means "Browse videos".... Ah, there she is, 2nd one down. Click on it, and up comes a video of the girl and some screen shots along with "click here for more" So I click on it and....What the fuck?...I'm redirected to a site called "Thai Girls Wild" and invited to join! Are you f-ing kidding me!!?? There below Eaw is a nearly famous picture of the beautiful Melena from Met-Art, also on the preview page. I follow the link and, BAM, it actually takes me to a Met-Art sign-up page! The girl on the top of the page, named Alyssa Hart here, is actually a referral to a site called Petite18.com.
Wow, so I've paid to see models from the preview page who are actually not on this site at all except for a few images and one video that are REALLY on sites that are paying this site for referrals. NOPE! NOPE! NOPE! DON'T DO THAT! IT IS AMONG THE MOST DECEPTIVE THINGS A PORN SITE CAN DO!
So...bottom line? Well, as far as I can tell, there is either no or very little original content on this site. It is an aggregation of libraries and referral agreements that provide content from other sites. And in addition to that, the site is deceptively advertising models on its preview page that are actually bait images for referrals to other sites.
As unlikely as I think this is,it is entirely possible that the webmasters of this site do have some unique content, are trying to create something and are only a referral site while they build up their collection. If that is the case, I apologize. However, you are deceiving people and my score reflects my disgust for this kind of deception.
I have never had to say this in a review before, but STAY FAR AWAY FROM THIS SITE!
I put it in there on a whim. Wanted to see if it made a difference since I've been posting forever and haven't gotten a new trust vote in a long time. I'm about 5 votes short of getting that badge and I think it is the only one I don't have. No big deal. I'll probably pull the request since it seems a little tacky to solicit for votes....
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good quality videos.
Nice looking models.
More fetish material than expected
Some of the bonus material is very good.
Sets are dated in both main and bonus sites
Everything is HD!
Image zips available for all scenes
Cons:
Lots of effort to get you to sign up to the other two 21 networks.
Sex is competent, not necessarily exciting.
More fetish material than expected.
Filter function is counter-intuitive.
Some of the bonus material is better than some of the main material...
Bottom Line:
It seems that 21Sextury has decided to add shelf-space and increase revenue by breaking up their network into 3 separate networks. That's OK, I guess, but the lines between these networks are a little blurry and arbitrary and the material in some doesn't make sense.
Here are a few stats that I could figure out.
21 Naturals:
About 780 sets on main site.
About 250 female and male actors listed
Sets are all dated
Videos are all HD up to 1080p.
Videos are scored via thumbs up/down.
Bonus sites contain another 1000 or so videos.
Videos are NOT tagged so you don't know if you are watching an anal or fetish video until you are.
You can select anal,for example, in a search filter, but you cannot de-select it.
21 Naturals is billed as the "natural" site with young, fit girls in the no-longer-trending white-room style of video shooting. If it were a site filled with JUST naturals, as billed, I would be pretty happy...but it isn't. It is also the default location for foot fetish and anal videos. In fact, those types of videos seem to outnumber the videos that I signed up for. If you are into anal there is some decent stuff here. Unfortunately, I'm not. Same with foot fetish stuff. I'm not into that either. Oh well, I guess I should have read on the preview page......oh wait, they don't say ANYTHING about fetishes within 21 naturals on the preview page. They say you have access to over 15 sites and over 100 new videos a month and don't elaborate any further. They show 2 OTHER sites called 21foot-art and 21erotic-anal, but they look like different sites in the preview, not integral parts of 21naturals. Similarly, the images on the 21naturals preview page are young solo models or straight sex images that fit with "natural". No fetishes shown or implied at all. More than a little misleading, especially if you think, like I did, that one of those other sites might be 21sextury. Nope. They are all micro-sites with a specific theme like Asian, big boobs, booty, more anal, DP or whatever. Now, in all honesty, these are awesome bonus sites compared to those offered in some other networks, so I can't knock them. But even the bonus sites don't really lend themselves to categories in some cases. The Bitch Club for example, includes many different types of scenes including, yep, some foot fetish and anal.
The videos are well done, well lit, well directed and the models are usually quite beautiful even in the bonus sites. The bonus sites, by the way, have the same look and feel, both in navigation and in content, as the main site, so I suspect that these bonus sites may be available in the other two networks. Don't know for sure.
Every scene is scripted and acted out. The interaction between the couple is often somewhat limited and you often don't see much chemistry between them. It isn't that the chemistry isn't there, I guess, but you don't see it. Scenes are often slow and the couples often don't even look at each other during sex, with very little kissing or affection. Kind of weird for this style of video, which can be both more affectionate and more kinetic on some other sites.
They do have an interesting "filter" system that allows you to select options like anal so the resulting videos include it. But the "filter" is backwards. FILTER means exclude, not include. So if I de-select anal, I should not get anal. Instead, when I deselect anal, all I get is anal! Deselect foot fetish and anal? you get both. In the meantime, if all I want to see is latinas having straight sex, nope. I can choose latinas, but it includes all latina scenes including fetishes. I apologize for ranting about this, but it is clear that the webmasters don't understand that, although they've put great effort into search functions, these functions are counter-intuitive.
Overall, I would compare this site to WowgirlsX-Art or Joymii. The material is very similar, with interaction perhaps a little less intimate than those sites. But these webmasters really missed the mark on determining where to separate their three networks and how to market them. Half of the material here belongs in a new network called 21fetish.
Is it worth visiting? Well, yes, it is,especially for the relatively low price. If you like anal or foot-jobs, there is some good stuff here. There is also some good straight sex stuff here, all in HD. But I am going to penalize the site a couple of points because of the totally whacked way they threw the fetishes into this otherwise young-girl straight-sex site, how the filters don't work and how the landing page shows you locked sets from the other networks in an effort to bait you into signing up over there.
I hope you found this useful! If so, a trust vote would be appreciated!
I have a subscription to this site and can download videos but there is an option at the top of each video that says "Buy it for a lifetime". When you click on it, the pop-up says it is about to charge my credit card $2.95. Does anyone have ANY idea what this is? There is no mention of DRM on the downloadable videos, so this is pretty confusing. Do the videos stop working after a subscription ends? If so, not disclosing it is criminal.
I joined 21Naturals from one of those "deals" pages that comes up on another site. It was $9.95 "for the next 12 hours!" I had never been to a 21 site so, thinking I was getting access to the entire network, I joined.
When you get to the main page, which is called 21members, 95% of the videos are locked! Across the top are 21Sextury, 21Sextreme and 21Naturals with a lock next to the first two. Turns out, the landing page for 21Naturals is sort of a bait page to get you to join the other two networks. (I'll bet the other sites land here, too.) The cost to join either of the other networks from here? $19.95 a month, the price I would have paid anyway. The videos here on 21Naturals are good, with a lot of SLOW sex and some foot fetish stuff, but I gladly would have paid the extra $10 to join the entire network. You should pay the extra $10, too. Eventually, when I fork out the $20, I will probably say it is worth it.
When looking at the "special deals" links, remember that if they look too good to be true, they are.
I post things on a lot of different BBs for different subjects ranging from classic and modern sports cars to robotics and animatronics to DIY home renovation to, of course, porn. Some are reviews, some are answers to questions, some are how-tos and some are questions to others. That closing line is just a sign-off that I use and I included it here out of habit, I guess. It is not a search for validation (after 10 years and 50 or so reviews, I'd be crazy to still be looking for that.) I do hope that this review helps PU readers make a decision about the site. That's all. :-)
Great feedback! This was a late night review and I did pull a little from my review of 21 Naturals (which uses the same overall set up and many of the same pages).
I'll go back and read this again and make some changes.
In general, I still think of HD like the cable companies do. 720 is marginal HD but it counts. 1080 is HD. 4k is something other than HD. I meant 1080.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good quality videos.
Nice looking models.
More fetish material than expected (if you are into it)
Some of the bonus material is very good.
Sets are dated in both main and bonus sites
Everything is HD back to about 2009
Image zips available for all scenes
Cons:
They try very hard to get you to sign up to the other two 21 networks.
Sex is competent, not necessarily exciting. (i.e. slow...)
More fetish material than expected (if you are not into it).
Filter function is counter-intuitive.
Some of the bonus material is better than some of the main material...
Bottom Line:
21 Sextury is now one of three 21 Network sites that are marketed together but subscribed to separately. There is very little logic regarding which videos end up in which network since they all contain straight and fetish material
Here are the stats I could find (as of 5/10/17)
21 Sextury:
About 9700 sets on main site.
About 2200 female and male actors listed
Sets are all dated
Recent Videos are HD up to 1080p.
Lots of older videos that are not HD.
Videos are scored via thumbs up/down.
Videos are NOT tagged so you don't know if you are watching an anal or fetish video until you are.
You can select anal,for example, in a search filter, but you cannot de-select it.
21 Sextury is the original site in this network and as such it is larger and older than the others.
Overall the quality of newer videos is very good. They are are high quality, well directed and well lit. The actresses are good looking and they come in all shapes, sizes, colors and and ages, but most of them are in the 20-30 range with a few more mature gals. The newer material is along the lines of Wow Girls or Joymii. The older material is....not so much. Much of it seems borrowed from old sites from this company, like Club Sandy.
There is a lot of fetish material here like peeing and anal. I thought 21 Naturals was the foot fetish site, but there is some here, too.
There are some backstage videos that include things like shaving and tweezing eyebrows. Meh. There is some light femdom and lesbian bondage, a few "doctor" videos involving a gyno chair and speculum as well as regular sex, and there is something called Nude Fight Club that is a lesbian wrestle then sex thing. You would think that this would be loser gets pinned and has to do whatever the winner wants, but they didn't think it through the much, so it is "Wrestle a little, tear each other's panties off, start munching and, oh here's a dildo. Interesting to watch once or twice...
There is also a lot of bonus content that is excepts from other sites or straight from DVD.
This content appears regardless of which site you have subscribed to.
One of the frustrating things about this site is how much effort they put into selling you subscriptions on their other two sites. The landing page includes updates from all the sites with a little lock over the ones you can't watch unless you purchase access.
Another surprising frustration is in searching for specific things or models that you like. There is SO MUCH material here that you can't just move through the models page looking for the ones you like. Doing that could take days!
There is NO SEARCH function. Instead, they have
a "filter" system that allows you to select options like anal so the resulting videos include it. But the "filter" is backwards. FILTER means exclude, not include. So if I de-select anal, I should not get anal. Instead, when I deselect anal, all I get is anal! Deselect foot fetish and anal? you get both. In the meantime, if all I want to see is latinas having straight sex, nope. I can choose latinas, but it includes all latina scenes including fetishes, behind the scenes, etc. And the options to select are very limited, so I can't search for videos that have, say, reverse cowgirls in them. Oh and lastly, once you select a video from the filtered list, when you return to the filter page, it has reset so you have to start all over. I apologize for ranting about this, but it is clear that the webmasters don't understand how this should work. Although they've put great effort into search functions, these functions are counter-intuitive and pretty-much useless.
Fortunately, there is a list of network sites in the left column. Micro-site names like Asshole Fever, Gapeland, Lezcuties and Footsie Babes help when searching for some stuff.
When you scroll through the models (pornstars) pages, you will see a lot of great looking girls (and guys), many of whom have different names than what you might expect. You can sort by most recent, most viewed, highest rated or alphabetical order. Only "most recent" gives you any idea of the age of a model or set. "Highest Rated" includes several models that have been out of the business for many, many years among the top 20. Also, the dates of the releases often do not reflect the dates of the videos. Bonus videos released recently might actually be videos that are 10+ years old.
Some are straight from DVD and many are not HD.
Bottom line is that there is a lot of material here and much of it is very good. There is a significant amount of fetish material here also.
But be prepared for your favorite models to have names that are different than you are used to. This, and the odd non-filter, means you will have to look very hard to find your favorites.
The site is worth it for a month, especially when you can find it at a discount, but the frustrations start to outweigh the pleasures by the end of your first month.
I have a subscription to this site and can download videos but there is an option at the top of each video that says "Buy it for a lifetime". When you click on it, the pop-up says it is about to charge my credit card $2.95. Does anyone have ANY idea what this is? There is no mention of DRM on the downloadable videos, so this is pretty confusing. Do the videos stop working after a subscription ends? If so, not disclosing it is practically criminal.
I'm looking at this "interactive" micro-site on 21s called "21role.com" It is a POV choose your option game-like video stream reminiscent of Bob Guccione's "Penthouse Interactive Photo Shoot" from 1987 or so. In 21role, the first few choices (i.e. let Kimmy Granger sleep or wake her up) are free but then you have to PAY CREDITS (at 10 cents a credit) to continue to progress to the actual sex scenes. You have no idea going in how much one scene is going to cost you. Has anyone actually tried this? Anyone have anything good to say about it?
VERY Funny! :-D I totally get it. The AAA-Cup (There, I said it again) girls I have dated were small enough to lift with one hand, which could be a lot of fun, but I prefer boobs that work well as bang intensity meters without risk of knocking me out. Variety is one of the spices of life, though, and a couple of my favorite models (Lorena G for example) don't have much up top but more than make up for it in other ways.
I understand what you are saying about the photos, but the vids? Do you download them or stream them? If I'm downloading material (which I am), what I don't want to do is spend a lot of time sifting through and deleting stuff I don't want. That means I am deleting half of the material in each set because EACH SET includes one of the aforementioned fetish sections. Yes, I like ALS, too, or I wouldn't keep coming back. I like it for the attitude. But each time I sign up, I do it because I forget how ridiculous some of the fetish material is.
You are suggesting that I just skip the part of the video I don't like or skip the images that I don't like. In order to skip them, you have to LOOK at them and looking at stuff you do't like pretty much defeats the purpose of visiting a porn site in the first place. MANY other sites separate out the straight material (in both photos and video) from the more fetish-like. Some even break them out into channels or separate micro-sites. There's no reason why they can't do that here, too. None, other than it would be slightly more difficult for the webmaster (even though he would have more sets to publish)
I like ALS and I enjoy the girls, but they've been using the embroidery hoop for DECADES now. It isn't sexy or erotic and I'm really sick of it. By breaking up the 200+ photo sets or the 25 minute videos, they could cater to their audience much more directly.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
