| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
Well... In college I dated two roommates in my apartment building and niether knew. Fun, but not as fun as it sounds. At one point, one was knocking on the door while I was in bed with the other. Sadly, no threesome.
Years later, back when people could still get to airport gates to meet passengers, my new bride-wife met me at the gate one night wearing just heels, stockings and a raincoat. She even flashed me a couple of times. Holy fuck that was incredible. We got in the car and she took off the coat as soon as we got out of the parking garage. We lived out in the country so on the way home, we just pulled off on a little farm access road and I fucked the hell out of her outside against the car. That was absolutely porn movie worthy!
|
12-21-18 01:16pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I'm about 75% computer but I have several big TVs, a home theater and a VR headset. Depends on who's home, who's watching it with me and how much time I/we have to watch it.
|
12-21-18 12:59pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
Depends on the quality of the material. I usually DL 1080 but sometimes 720. For VR, I download the 1920x1080 resolution as the larger ones (2300x1080) create really huge files and don't always work properly.
|
12-12-18 05:57pm
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
OH! And just by Coincidence, I rejoined Vixen.com today on their black Friday $9.95 a month special. Great site and excellent videos but one of their MALE actors is COVERED with tattoos from shoulder to ankle, front to back including arms. OMFG that is SO distracting! How am I supposed to imagine that I am the guy in these scenes when the guy looks like that! As I'm thinking about it, the male actors also need to be tattoo free so the tattoos are not distracting. I encounter heavily tattood male actors on many sites, including POV and VR sites, and in many cases, they have more tattoos than the girls do. Absolutely not OK!
|
11-21-18 09:37pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
Two different scenarios. Met Art and bad ass. Other than the occasional tiny tattoo on some porn models, I prefer not to see them. These girls are fucking beautiful. Why agree to be some oter persons canvas for life? It detracts from the physical beauty of the girl. Even relatively small but prominent tattoos on truly beautiful women, like those on Melena Morgan or Eva Taylor are hugely dissappointing. That said, there are a few cases where tattoos on a really sexy girl help to reinforce the bad-girl image. These would be girls that are physically attractive, but have really high quality sleeves, thigh or shoulder tattoos. A few examples can be found on Suicidegirls, but not all SGs are good examples. To me, these are girls that look like they would be a lot of fun to fuck and would really enjoy it. So I am a split decision on the tattoo thing. Mostly no, but sometimes fuck yes!
|
11-21-18 04:31pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I like to watch POV and VR video and there are a few peeves. First, the guy should NEVER MAKE A SOUND. In POV/VR, YOU are the guy so when the guy says something, your reaction is "Who the fuck was that?" like there is somebody standing behind you. IN VR, it actually sounds like there is somebody standing behind you.... The other thing I don't really like is when the girls get too blatant about what is going in. This may seem silly, but "Put your dick in my pussy", especially with foriegn accent, is nowhere near as hot as just "Fuck me". I dunno, as lame as this is, I prefer a little verbal subtlety. No need for an intercourse blow-by-blow.
|
11-21-18 03:59pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
You could not have sex with a woman because she was shaved? Seriously? I'm sure there were a few other things going on there that you are not mentioning.....right???
|
10-31-18 02:08pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I grew up in south Florida where they had every type of porn/sex/strip outlet and I had sampled most of them by the time I left for college. I tried a theater once but it was pretty boring considering how lax the rules were back then at some of the strip clubs.
|
05-08-18 07:50pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Too many options. The question should be what is the best music you've ever gotten busy to.
|
04-26-18 02:57pm
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
These days, a lot of the latex pocket-pussy things are made in the likeness of many porn stars. I probably have a couple, but I can't recall which porn stars they are. I don't buy those things because they are in somebody's likeness....
|
04-17-18 06:15am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Call them up and telling them you are moving to a competitor. (Check to make sure you have a competitor first) They will connect you to the "customer retention" department. Those people are authorized to negotiate a better deal and will usually offer a pretty nice package for 6 months or so.
|
04-02-18 06:00pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I cull on a regular basis. Non-HD videos are pretty unwatchable these days. I also have an archive of stuff that I might want to look at but is more than 10 years old.
|
03-30-18 05:12pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What merc77 said.
|
03-30-18 05:06pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Did you really think anyone on this site was going to say Porn? :-)
|
03-30-18 05:05pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Poll
I'm thinking maybe this question could have been phrased differently....
I've never watched porn in public or on a smart phone.
I do, however, have several iPads including one I keep next to my bed and one that I travel with. So I will, occasionally, watch porn on an iPad in a hotel room. Considering there was once an entire industry focused on getting you to buy expensive Spectravision movies in hotel rooms, I don't consider this a big deal.
|
03-30-18 05:02pm
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Ok, four things (started out as two but then I started thinking about it...). First, if I'm watching a sex scene by myself, I want the male to be as non-descript as possible. If the fantasy is supposed to be that the guy is me, then I don't really want the video to emphaisize him at all and he can NOT be distinctive in any way. I am older but, as long as I'm fantasizing anyway, I may as well fantasize that I am 20-35 and I certainly don't really want to see a 60+ guy in a sex scene. it is too distracting.
Second, the same thing applies to POV and VR videos. If the guy is a surrogate me, he should be as generic as possible. "Hey! Look at my giant chest tattoo!" or "Hey look! I'm Black!" is not really something I enjoy be distracted with in VR or POV.
Third, there are some male actors that are so incredibly sleazy looking, I have a hard time watching the video. These are not necessarily older guys but guys who look like they just crawled out from under a bridge. Fetish Network has a prominant male who falls into this category. He is perfect for the "home invasion", "hitchhiker" and older bondage videos on that site, but after a while, I found I just could not watch him.
And fourth, if my wife and I are watching porn, the male needs to be the best looking guy on the planet and he needs to be...capable in many ways. The idea of the two of us watching an older guy bang a younger girl in a video does nothing for her, so it sort of defeats the purpose of watching the video in scene in the first place.
Those are my 4 thoughts on the subject!
|
03-30-18 04:55pm
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
I'm assuming yoiu are talking about listing scenes on the tour pages, correct?
A listing of scenes or a count of scenes?
Some sites have a lot of scenes, so listing them in the tour section would be pretty difficult, although some sites are set up so you can see thumbnails of scenes/sets but not watch them.
To me, the number of scenes and the frequency of scene release are pretty important stats.
I really think you can get a read on whether a site is honest or not by looking at the preview pages and reading reviews. If the informatio nyou want to see about the site is not there, move on.
|
02-23-18 04:07pm
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think most of the time the rule about topics at the diner table is SEX, politics and religion. Fortunately, PU covers the first item quite nicely. Facebook and Twitter seem to have a handle on the other two.
|
02-19-18 02:48pm
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Poll
Can we go macro for a minute? This is a great community, but sometimes there are bad players. PU has a "report" option in every thread but I'm guessing people don't use it very often. Like the "trust" ratings, there is also a potential for people to abuse the process "reporting" others who don't share their views on a particular site, etc.
PU members are a rare breed and it is refreshing being able to talk about so many un-PC things. I mean, just saying the letters BDSM in public these days is likely to get you arrested. (kidding...mostly.)
How do we develop a system where people are free to say what they want, but those who make particularly biased, racist or religously tainted comments are politely told that their comments are not appreciated? I honestly don't know.
Ultimately, like the Whopr discovered in the 80's movie War Games, perhaps the best way to win when people are trolling or presenting controvercial comments is NOT TO PLAY. Just don't respond to nonsense. If you do, you are only provoking more.
|
02-19-18 02:40pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I'm talking solo girl sets here, mostly....
I've come to appreciate...particular poses that, for the most part, have become part of the formula for most solo girl sets on many sites. It really surprises and amazes me when sets in several popular sites omit them. I have so much stuff now that most sets that don't include those poses don't make it onto my hard drive.
The other thing that is an absolutel requirement, regardless of anything else, is model eye contact with the camera.
|
02-16-18 05:29pm
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
superjank's Poll
Wait, where are the "No" and "Hell NO!" options? There are maybe 3 women in all of porn that I would consider downloading a non HD video of and they would have to be doing something a-mazing (because I already have every released video ever produced of them...)! All of my non-HD porn has been relegated to an archive drive along with a few million images that are postage stamp sized on a modern monitor.
|
02-12-18 06:43pm
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Onyx's Poll
I bought a VR headset (HTC Vive) to play games over a year ago, but the gaming environment is still in a developmental stage...like the early days of apps for iPhones. I probably use the thing about 50% for VR porn, I've signed up to (and reviewed) most of the VR porn sites, I have a couple of annual subscriptions to get the weekly VR videos and I have about 5 terabytes of VR porn (just checked...waw!). It is completley immersive and very entertaining. I think Onyx and I are the flagbearers for VR porn here on PU and between us, we cover most of the VR sites and have slightly different perspectives.
If you are VR curious, I strongly recommend that you buy a cheap $20 cardboard or plastic headset for your smart phone and grab a free VR video from any one of a multitude of sites. This will not reflect the video quality of VR, but it will give you a pretty good idea of what it is like.
|
02-12-18 04:17pm
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Interesting that so may responded "don't watch football". I wonder what that means..... I don't really watch it either but I think New England will win because they've been there so many times before.
|
02-02-18 06:02pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
There is always a site or two that deceives you. For example, any site that charges extra for zips or downloads, but you don't find this out until after you sign up. That really sucks. Mindgeek has a bunch of sites set up that way like Twisty's and Playboy Plus. The taglines usually say "Access to" which is a fancy way to say you can see but not keep.
|
02-02-18 05:54pm
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I often find myself at the sign-up page for sites that don't have very good pricing and move-on. I really think a lot of sites don't understand basic marketing. Example. In The Crack. They have several usage and resolution based tiers of access but the most popular is $39.95 a month. That is a ton of money but I went ahead and joined for one month. One month. $39.95 one time and Fuck you very much. I inquired about annual pricing but they simply have none. None! Clearly, this left a bad impression. Compare that to Vixen. Vixen is currently subscriptions for $10 a month. Holy shit this is an awesome site for $10 a month. They only update 1 or 2 times a week but the stuff is every bit as good as ITC and there are no stupid download limits. For the "special" rate $10 a month, I pretty much didn't care that I was on a monthly subscription. I only recently looked to see what the annual subscription rate was and have been paying monthly for about a year now. So from a revenue stream perspective, I paid ITC $39.95, grabbed what I wanted and left with mixed feelings about the greediness of the site. Vixen got at least $120 from me, which I now know is more than the price of an annual subscription, but I feel damn good about Vixen because they are very generous with the low subscription rate.
At the end of the day, the on-line porn business is no different than any other. The goal is to GET and KEEP customers. Crappy, greedy sites just want a fast buck from you. Good ones know they need to treat you right. That means discounts for annual subscriptions, discounts for sister sites and "Please come back" discounts. I'm really amazed at how many sites don't get that.
|
01-29-18 09:48am
|
