This is one of those cases where I read the review and did not quite get what you were saying. I was thinking the site has probably changed a lot since you signed up 5 years ago. Guess what? It hasn't.
Nubiles.net no longer included in NP subscription.
Today, 1/1/18, I linked to nubilesporn.com from PU and see a good $15 a month rate, but when I look at the sites included, nubiles.net isn't listed. When I got to nubiles.net, the rate is a much steeper $24.00 a month but the list of sites included shows all of the network sites include NP. So apparently, they no longer include NN with the NP subscription. I opened a different browser and went straight to NP and the rate is $24 a month and still does not include NN. So it looks like if you want NN, which is the largest site in this network, you will need to join NN.
I've recently started subscribing to sites for a year at a time because, after doing the math, I realize I spend that much at my favorite sites anyway and the longer memberships are usually great values. Usually...except...not with nubiles.net. A 1 year membership with Nubiles WITH the PU discount is $209.00!!! $209??? Wow, that is a lot! A regular, undiscounted 1 year membership with Met Art is $99. Femjoy: $99. MC Nudes: $99. Twisty's: $119. Als Scan: $139. There are a couple of sites that charge $150 or so for a 1 year membership, but very, very few that charge $209. Since there is no real incentive for me to sign up for a year (3 months free compared to others 6 months free), I guess I will have to join for a month or two and then quit for awhile like I used to do. Oh well... A pain for me and a loss of revenue for them.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge selection of models doing just about anything a guy could want. Excellent navigation. You can set favorites and leave feedback, which influences the scores models get. Many outstanding models. Good mix of photos and videos. Also a good mix of body shots and close ups. Probably one of the best all-teen sites around.
Cons:
Not much in the way of cons. Maybe a few more outdoor sets. Maybe a few more two-girl three-ways...
Bottom Line:
Bottom line? There is something for just about everyone here. Well worth a visit. Although this is a teen site, there is a decent variety of shapes and sizes and a good mix of solo, guy/girl and girl/girl sets. The set locations themselves are basic but not distracting. This isn't glam stuff, but the girls are nicely done-up. Some of the girls you will recognize as they are popular models elsewhere but there are a few exclusives and a few really show their best stuff here. (Just look up Zoey, Malena or a girl named Ebbi and you will see what I mean.) Navigation is great and there doesn't seem to be any really poor images or videos. The site sorts models by popularity (score) but politely stops in that category at about 9 for the benefit of the models. It also sorts by update date and model name. Note that many of the models have different names here than they do on other sites so you have to sift through them if you are looking for anyone in particular. One nice touch is that on most model's pages, there are a few large images, nude and non-nude wallpaper images and collections across all sets titled "ass". "boobs", "legs" and "close-ups". I have been a member here several times over the years and the quality has been consistent on each visit, perhaps a little better this last time. Overall, very good general teen site.
Just to clarify, the $60 lifetime thing is contingent on maintaining one membership. So I'm paying $10 a month for one of the sites but have access to all of them. If/when I quit that one site, I will lose access to the other sites too. It is kind of a gimmick, but it seems worth it.
I wrote a review for Passion HD several years ago and was just reading through yours when I realized I'm a current member! I joined POVD a while back and, not satisfied with the infrequent updates, went ahead and paid the $70 for the one-time fee to join the whole network. I wrote reviews for POVD and Tiny4K that included some comments about passion HD, I think. Just be sure you are paying the smallest monthly fee you can, then buy the one-time ticket.
I also wanted to let you know they have a new site in the network package called "holed.com" that is probably, um, right up your alley. It is a brand new site that only has 24 scenes, but some of them are really good and I'm not into anal. And you already know the network has some great and very popular young US models. There are some other anal scenes in the network in POVD and Lubed also. The best thing about joining the network is that there are often one or two updates a day and the quality is very consistent across the board.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Videos are available in a variety of formats including HD. Models are generally very attractive. A few well known models.
Cons:
The advertising seems a little deceptive. There are only about 120 videos on the site, with Videos dating back only to November of 2011. That would be 1-3 videos a week since inception. Videos rarely depict the same imagery as the teaser images they are linked to (in any quantity at least..10 minute video, 5 seconds of a particular angle or shot and that's what they tease you with.).
Bottom Line:
Nope, sorry. Stay away from this one until it gets a LOT more content and they tweak the formule a bit. The advertising showing slick scenes, awesome couples or groups and amazing "first person" angles does not really reflect what is on the site.
This site includes some Porn Pro-like footage with the objective of selling it in more of an X-Art.com format. It almost works, but very, very little of the material is...artsy enough to pull it off and only a few of the participants look like they are enjoying themselves or their partners. Look at the images depicting the scenes and you think holy crap this is going to be hot! What you get when you watch are a lot of OK, moderaately dissapointing sex scenes in very similar bright white settings with entirely too much footage from the same angle (across the bed on the side). It is almost clinical! Several of the videos look like they take place in the same rented villa in Arizona or California someplace. When there are several videos of the same girl, they are all pretty clearly from the same day no matter how hard they try to change things up. And much of the sex, which should be OMG hot, ends up looking like acting...mediocre acting...not that the industry has any really great acting, but the couples should at least be into each other.
There are a few models you would recognize; Zoey and Jessie, for example. I have NEVER seen Jessie or Zoey, two young, vibrant, energetic and attractive models, not entirely enjoying themselves...except here. Here the sex looks like work. (Jessie has a scene where 90% of the time she is getting screwed on a piano bench with her head slamming against a baby grand piano. That So did not look comfortable or fun!)
I rarely find a site that I can't recommend. Unfortunately, I can't recommend this one.
Hi, I'm about to do a review of this one, but I'll answer your questions. There are about 120 videos and about 60 models as of this date. Admission to the sit does NOT give you access to PP network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very unique, playful style - a true "indie" web site
Unique look and feel
Fairly exclusive European models
57 of the girls are French according to site
A few popular models
True High resolution images to 4000k- crisp images
HD videos for most models
Newer site so no old low res material!
Great search options
Model mouseover summary and "exposure limits" very helpful
Newer models/sets are very good
Coolest "Shop" area I'v ever seen.
A good deal for the price!
Cons:
Collection is not that large, but growing
Information is sparce once at the model pages
Rating system is confusing (model or set?)
Can't search by model score.
Many Models are not very engaging
Many models are pretty but not knockouts
Many models/sets are not nude
Navigation/viewing options are limited
(i.e. 10 models per page, 18 sets per page)
There are a few minor navigation issues (page back does not work so you have to reload a lot)
A few broken/incorrect links (might be in the middle of upgrading )
Set dates are not universally available.
Bottom Line:
This is the type of site that reminds me how incredibly difficult it must be to run a popular, successful porn site. They do many, many things really well here, but the overall package falls a little short, overall score-wise, of the big players.
This is currently a nude and non-nude modeling site. mostly passive, candid, single model, photography. No sex, nothing kinky in any way with the exception of a very small number of VERY light B&D sets. In this regard, it is kind of like the local strip club....the girls you WANT to see more of are not the girls you ARE seeing more of, if you catch my drift. If you have an appetite for sex scenes, toys, bondage, close-ups, spread legs, anything more than passaive nude modeling photogrpahy, this may not be the site for you at the moment, but check back as it looks like the folks here are making some very positive improvements in both the site and the collection. If you are the type who likes passive scenes, dressing room shots, that kind of thing, then this may be an EXCELLENT site for you. Frankly, there is a lot of variety here and my tastes, admittedly, run toward more engaging solo scenes.
Here are some basics from what I can tell...
About 100 models
About 350 sets
1 new set every 2-3 days
Sets have between 30 and 60 images
Models all seem to be 18-24
Model are, as the name implies, petite.
Most sets are in studio.
The design of this site makes it fun and different. I think the webmasters were trying to incorporate a Moulin Rouge kind of feel, and they came very close to pulling it off. Model thumbnails are shown full sized and they go nude with a mouse-over. Saw the technique in a french body study years ago and it is VERY effective here at showing you exactly what the models look like. Clicking on a model brings a pop-up that shows all of her sets. Once you select a set, you get about 36 images per page, a "stars" score, and a thumbnail slider that allows you to go to other sets of the same model. Very nice concept. In execution, though, the name of the model does not show up on the model page anywhere, only in the hard-to-read thumbnails, the stars scoring is not immediately clear (model or set? SET!), the model bio is not available from here, the sets are not dated here, the cover images are included for sets scheduled for up to a month away (so you click on a model and a set and THEN find that the set isn't on the site yet). Some navigation options are missing, but don't hit back-page here (or ANYWHERE) or you will have to reload your browser. (I also clicked on something once or twice and got dropped into a shell directory where I shouldn't have been...looks like they are in the middle of upgrades.) I love the navigation style here, but it could be much better with a few small tweaks.
When you first look at the site, it really does give a Moulin Rouge feel. The sample images are representatative, so you honestly see what you get.
The photography, though competent, is sometimes a little weak. There are some excellent studio sets, but many sets are passive, so you feel like you are following the model around through her apartment or something. There is a little model interaction with the photographer (and therefore the viewer), but not much. This may be more about the models,as the more popular models are more interactive (it is part of what makes them popular) than the neophytes. But the incongruity between the playful feel of the site and the passive feel of many of the sets is what makes things a little...off here. They need a little more of the sexual energy you find at Twisty's or ALSscan...you usually only get that with the hyper-confident pro-models or with a photographer/shoot team that is ungodly talented. I noticed that many commenters like the passive stuff and frankly have no idea how one would balance the two styles. I have to say, though, that the newer photography is much, much better in terms of interaction and content than the older stuff, so clearly somebody here gets it.
I really want this site to be a success. It is different. It is unique. It is not a formula web site. It deserves to be successful. I could easily and rightfully compare it to an Indie in the movie industry. But the problem with indies is that, although they are often critically acclaimed, they just as often don't get the popular vote simply because they are not following the popular formula or because of one or two faults. This site COULD be a Kill Bill, a Pulp Fiction, A Quentin Tarantino kick-ass example of a web site. Unfortunately, it isn't quite there....yet. Clearly, I am rooting for it, though.
Bottom line: A very unique site that is worthy of a look. With a few tweaks in the site and content, this could be among the top players and it seems as though the webmasters here are figuring that out. I will absolutely be back in a year or so to see how things have progressed.
I tripped over this site again the other day. The photography is awesome and the models are beautiful but I notice several 10+ year old photo shoots among the samples. Has anyone joined lately?
I replied to Ladylover below, but I didn't want this to get lost in the responses. The $99 lifetime membership is a sleazy cash grab. I just chatted with support on Playboy Plus and, yes, to get ANY useful features (like the ability to download ANYTHING and actual HD videos), you need VIP, which is another $10 a month. SO....$99 for a half-assed lifetime subscription of limited use and duration and ANOTHER $120 a year to be able to download anything or get HD. TOTALLY DECEPTIVE!!!!!
I also just got a promotion for the $99 lifetime memership. Does anyone know if this is streaming only or if it includes downloads and HD? Even if it only lasts for two years, this seems like a decent deal, but not if it will cost me another $10 a month to be able to download anything.
Update: I just chatted with support on Playboy Plus and, yes, to get ANY useful features, you need VIP, which is another $10 a month. SO....$99 for a half-assed lifetime subscription of limited use and duration and ANOTHER $120 a year to be able to download anything or get HD. TOTALLY DECEPTIVE!!!!!
My comment below still holds. This site and many others by this site management group offer a standard or discounted price for membership that ONLY allows browsing and streaming. I've seen other sites from other companies that have a special streaming-only price, but to charge $10 a month more for the ability to download images is absurd. I recall a representative saying that "most of our customers prefer streaming and don't want to download" which, of course, is complete bullshit. This is a cash-grab bait and switch and I recommend that nobody sign up until this management company changes this stupid tactic or fails.
Hey, guys, if you are going to include a price in your review, especially a discounted price, you REALLY need to explain that it is for streaming only. You SHOULD NOT quote a streaming only price, and then list "NO DOWNLOAD LIMIT" and go on to describe file formats in your review summary section. Either quote a full price that includes downloads, or OMIT THE INFORMATION THAT DOES NOT APPLY TO THE PRICING YOU GIVE! I have seen this for almost all of the reviews you have done for the MG Billing sites and that is A LOT of sites. This is the only site management group that has a bait-and-switch hidden tier. You sort of mention it in the body of the review, but the pricing and review details are contradictory. PLEASE START HIGHLIGHTING IT IN THE PRICING!
So...what happened? I would hate to think that a company/brand as reputable as Playboy would give you the runaround. I found your note because I was here looking before signing up. I think I'll wait to hear what happens with your case before I do.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High quality videos and images
Great variety
Reasonable download speeds
Many pornstars and models you've heard of
Sets have dates added
Cons:
Alot of non-exclusive content
Some "teaser" scenes from other sites
Navigation can be circular at times
No counts or easy way to see how often updates occur.
"in-network" sites don't have much content.
Bottom Line:
Whoever owns this site probably really is a porn mastermind. He managed to talk several other sites into giving him content for referral. Unlike a few other sites that I've really complained about, this one is pretty clear about the source of their content and the list of other sites that some of the content comes from is pretty impressive. The only thing I can't figure out completely is which sites are part of THIS network and which sites are referrals.
So, here goes:
The sites that look like they are in-network, meaning you get all of the content, includes:
NewgirlPOV.com: This site has maybe 25 video sets. The girls are attractive and the sets are well done. Some good POV stuff here.
Fuckedhard18.com/massagegirls18.com: This is two sites, but the sets seem almost interchangable. Several popular porn models in this mix. Massagegirls18 has about 218 videos dating back to 2009. Some good stuff here, too. Fuckedhard18 also has over 200 videos but it appears that some overlap with the other site.
All of these sets can be watched or downloaded either complete or in smaller pieces. Most are in HD. All of these sets for these two sites start out on a massage table. The girls get oiled up and fucked.
The next site is called fuckedhardGFs.com. This is a collection of videos in many different locations and scenarios. Lots of popular porn stars here. Some good, some just OK. Looks like about 96 videos here.
Next is a site called Epicsex.com. Similar to the site above, but more of the "white room" style shooting. Not bad. About 45 videos here.
The last site that appears to be in the network is called bangable.com This is a solo model video site that is totally softcore, kind of playboy-esque. There are a few nice models here, but nothing special going on.
I suggest you check out pornmastermind.com for a month both for the videos in the network and for access to samples from several other sites that you might not otherwise know about.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Incredibly large collection of porn video segments. (65,000 of them!!!)
Wide variety of video types.
Just about every major porn star out there for the last decade or more. (10,000 of them!)
Navigation is not bad considering the size and nmumber of sites.
Cons:
There is SO MUCH stuff that it is a challenge to sift through if you have specific tastes.
Videos are porn movie segments, so the quality of video and performacne varies a LOT.
Much of the material is standard def and really old.
Many of the videos are very poor quality.
Only a few of the videos I've seen so far are HD, making them hard to watch on a large screen. Most of these have OK quality and fair content. (You can search for 1080 in advanced search)
The videos are not dated, either for video release date or publication on the site. (But you may see the release date at the very beginning of the video....as far back as 2001!)
It is impossible to determine the quality of a video before clicking on it as there is no resolution data.
There are a lot of industry "veterans"...only a few of which still look good, if you catch my drift.
Bottom Line:
OK, I have to start by saying that I am not a traditional porno movie guy. I have a huge collection of solo softcore and hardcore images and HD videos created on sites like Twisty's, Ron Harris, Digital Dream Girls, Passion HD, ALSscan, etc. Typically, videos on these sites are created especially for the sites and are studio grade and HD. I'm only trying to establish a baseline here so you know where I'm coming from.
Pornstars Network is like a day on Haulover beach, a nude beach in Miami. There is a whole lot to see, but you have to sift through a lot of really mediocre and a moderate amount of really bad stuff to find the real gems. There are some gems, though, which makes the visit worth it at least once.
The first thing that struck me about this site is the incredible volume of videos. There are 65,000 of them spread out across 52+ sites. And the different sites include almost every taste. All of the videos are segments from a DVD lasting about 10-25 minutes in length.
The 52 individual sites include niche sites like:
Tiny ass
My MILF story Hostile Fucking
Club Smash
Black dick, round ass
My first sex video
Jizz Mouthwash Only DP
And a bunch of sites dedicated to indivdual male or female porn stars.
Navigation is pretty good. The sites are listed by both name and type. Once in a site, the thumbnails show a few screenshots of the video and once you click on the video, you can see an entire set of screenshots before watching or downloading the movie. You can also search by pornstar name to list all of a pornstars videos. That's nice if you happen to like, say, Tori Black, and want to see all of her stuff. The site also lists, in order of popularity, every model they have. The list starts with Sasha Grey at number 1 and some girl named Krystal at number 10,057! Really! 10,057 pornstars! And, like I said before, the site lists 65,000 videos! So, if you are into porn videos, this place is a treasure trove.
OK, now for the more critical stuff. Like porn movies themselves, the vast majority of videos here just aren't that great. The video quality is marginal, direction is poor, the camera jitters or the angle is bad, the acting is awful, the performers are not appealing, etc. Pretty much ALL of these videos are not HD. Again, there are 65,000 videos! So even if 60,000 of them sucked, 5,000 would still qualify as good or better. That's way more than a lot of other sites, but the challenge is sifting through the junk to find the gems.
There are some other annoyances, too, but some of them are more about my tastes than the site. A LOT of these videos are really old by Internet standards. Number 1 on the pornstar list is Sasha Grey. Damn, she is hot, but she stopped doing porn in 2009. Jenna Haze, #4, has videos from 2001. I can understand how several of the top 20 can be, um, veteran porn starts, but none of this material is in HD, making it really hard to watch on a computer or bigscreen.
Much of the material is very, very raw. I realize that is the point in some cases, but many of the pornstars that are goddesses on sites like Twisty's or Digital Dreamgirls are just kind of cute at best in these videos. Tori Black, for example, does some terrific stuff on Twisty's and looks about as badass as any girl I've ever seen on that site. In the videos here, she's almost plain. That's more than a little dissapointing.
And then there are the European models that show up in niches like "Auditions" and "First time Videos". You've seen a lot of them on other sites and many are beautiful enough to stop a 747 in mid-flight. One of the reasons I sometimes prefer images to videos is because many of these girls are ungodly beautiful until they move, walk, talk or act. Some European and latin women tend to exagerate their expression as part of the culture. This site is the best example of this that I've ever seen. Some of these girls acting is so hideous that it is actually embarrasing to watch! I never thought that was possible before.... (Exception: Bambi)
There is a lot of other schlocky stuff too.
I know anal sex has been popular in porn for many years, but does it have to be included in almost every sex scene?
It also seems like, although they have nearly every pornstar out there, they DO NOT have those pornstars best work. Instead its the star's early work or off-beat or fetish stuff. There are 57 Sasha Grey videos on this site. Sasha was a pretty kinky pornstar but I KNOW she did some really nice one-on-one stuff as I've seen it elsewhere. Not here. Most of her videos here are gangbangs with 5+ guys, group sex scenes where she gets totally creamed or odd fetish scenes. Not a single straight sex scene with her on the whole site. Too bad.
OK, I'm out of space...
Bottom line: If you are into porn videos, you simply must visit this site, but be prepared to do a lot of sifting to find the stuff that really floats your boat.
I'm looking at this site on the TBP front page and am having a hard time understanding how they can charge $30 a month for 11 sets. There are no full sized samples whatsoever, no dated releases or release schedule and you can't even see what is on the 2nd page of updates. It has the popular stars, but a very, very small number of them.
I'm also a little confused since I can't see the sets...is this a handjob site or full-sex POV like POVD?
Put a $19 promo rate on TBP and I'll join and write a review. Otherwise, $30 can get me hundreds or even thousands of great sets elsewhere, so that's where I'm going.
Yes, they are different. Maybe it changed as the sites matured and they realized they were leaving money on the table. Mine was a on-time payment for access as long as I maintained a subscription to one account. IT still works out to more than an annual subscription to one site, but not to 5-7 sites.
No, my "lifetime" bonus option did not include Baeb. I joined Baeb separately because of a particular model and I did not know until I joined that it was part of this network. I get all the sites you get. I only had it for a month because it is really, really small. I wrote a review, I think.
I've also had a site or two added since I joined. The "Holed" site was added, I know.
So it seems like the gimmick is the same, but they changed the time from forever to one year.
I need to write a new review here. I've been a member of this network for a year or more, now. There are several different niches within the pay-once network with an update someplace every day. As a result, the total network collection is pretty huge and they seem to be adding new specialty sites (like holed.com and baeb.com) fairly often.
Before you join, find the cheapest site on this network and join that, then choose the all-site option from that site for a $69 one time fee. As long as you stay a member to that one site, you will have access to all of them.
This site has grown pretty significantly (200 videos) and the network has matured also. I rejoined this site and then added the $69 option to join all of the network sites and there is a ton of good content here. Lubed and Tiny4K are also good. I wrote a review about Tiny4K that is a more current impression.
After realizing I usually have a membership to one of the sites on this network, I went ahead and bought the upgrade for permanent access to the entire network for $69. Unfortunately, the upgrade does not provide me with the ability download many of the top rated set videos or images, just watch them...not really what I signed up for. I tried contacting thier tech support about this, but got no response back from anybody.
I'll follow up and let you know if it ever gets resolved.
Follow-Up - 10-18-16:
The limited download option has been resolved somehow. I can now download any video within the network.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
