The videos in general are very high quality but there are a few that don't rank up there with the rest. In general the video is MUCH better than your typical hardcore or amateur site.
Absolutely true about the fish eye. What is interesting about this site is that many (not all) of the videos are a mix of go-pro on the head and tripod-over-the-bed-behind-the-guy video. This method avoids the shake-as-you-bang effect. There are also a few seconds here and there where one of the cameras is visible. One of them is a small, decent quality HD video camera with internal stabilization. And there almost always seems to be a 2nd person involved in the shoot in one way or another. So these guys are not out to make cheap videos, they are out to make a lot of money by spreading their collection over as many sites as possible. That strategy will work once their collection is a little larger, but right now it is just frustrating.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very nice high quality videos
Generally very nice looking models
Good lighting and sets
A few minutes of amazing POV footage in every scene
Navigation is simple
Nice layout
Mostly US models that sometimes talk a little
Considerable variety of girls
Cons:
Very little content
Some video is very distorted (think go-pro)
Many links to other sites you have to pay for
A few videos FROM other sites.
Infrequent updates
Inconsistent access and download speeds
Bottom Line:
On the face of it, this is a pretty interesting site and I joined because of their amazing POV videos peppered around the Internet. I knew the content would be small, but not THIS small. There are only about 40 videos TOTAL that are native to this site as of 5/15/2014. Fortunately, the site owners take pity on you and give you limited, rather inconsistent access to a few other sites.
This site is actually part of a network, but you don't have full access to the rest of the network. Instead, you occasionally get to watch one of the other-site videos and maybe download that content, but you don't always have access to the other sites...maybe there is a view limit to external material or something...I'm not sure. I am thankful, though, that the site owners recognize that giving away some content from their other sites is a good idea, but there really isn't enough content within this whole network to compete with some of the bigger sites out there. If you DO want to join the whole network, it will set you back $69.00 a month or so for a monthly subscription. Thanks, but no thanks. I've been a member of some of the other sites, and they are also very small (Passion-HD, Casting Couch-X, Fantasy-HD, Pure Mature and ExGF) although the video quality is usually very good. I get that these guys have to make money, but Geeez.... explain the rules to me, please.
This site is a video site so the images are secondary and mostly just from the video shoot. Some are screen-caps but it seems that there is somebody taking pictures as well and many of these are not bad.
Download times seem a lot slower than average and downloads time out a LOT and once stopped cannot be restarted. I can't tell if this is due to a download limit or something else. Again, it would really help to know the rules.
The videos themselves are generally very good and all are 720 or 1080p. I have no idea why it has taken so long for POV videos to take off. There is nothing quite like a virtual scene where you are looking down at a totally naked girl who is on her back with her legs in the air as your virtual dick rams into her. And you get to see it from your POV for pretty much every sexual position. There is one scene where "you" are lying on a bed and a girl sits on your face, but then as the camera angle changes (you tilt your virtual head a little), you see another girl bouncing on your dick. That just seems like the pinnacle of virtual sex to me....at least until they start creating porn for an Oculus Rift!
There are a few nitpicks that I am not fond of, but other people may really like. For one, the male actor in many of the scenes is into licking assholes. A POV close-up of somebody licking a girls asshole is something you can't really un-see and I prefer not to see another tongue going into an asshole from that close....ever again. Also, there are a couple of girls that, although generally very attractive, just are not ready for their close-ups when you are talking about being a couple of inches away from their snatch in the glory of high-def. Fortunately, only a few girls fall into this category. But the most disturbing oddity is that occasionally the POV switches to that of the woman. It is sometimes interesting when the girl is in the shower or something, but this is really, really weird when the girl is getting fucked. There you are drawn into an amazing scene imagining you are screwing the lights out of this awesome girl and suddenly, the POV perspective changes, you are the girl and YOU are getting screwed! Sorry. HUGE NOPE! Same thing happens occasionally while the guy is getting head. I suppose when it comes to POV, there is "give and take", but I am not a taker in this regard. Some Day I'll fire up my Adobe Suite and edit all the junk out of these...some day...maybe. My suggestion to the camera crew and website owners is to take that stuff and create a separate girls POV site. One hetero and one lesbian, even. How about gay POV? You never know who might show up....well, except it won't be me. Sorry.
Bottom line? There are a few OMG videos here that make it worth it to visit, but try to do it at a discount and don't sign up for more than the minimum time-frame....at least until they get their video count up quite a bit. The quality is great, but the quantity is just too low for now.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Decent quality videos
All seem to be in HD
Several download options
Some attractive girls
Cons:
60 TOTAL videos (August 2016)
Site is extremely slow
No preview photos
Can't view photos, just download them.
Teaser photo rarely reflects the scene
Scenes are so contrived as to be laughable
No model listings
No search
ONE New set every week or two
Bottom Line:
I'm just going to try to write a quick one for this site because, frankly, that's all there is to write about.
60 scenes.
Each scene has a screenshot photo set
Extremely slow navigation
No model credits or search
60 sets.
The only reason this site exists is because it advertises as a "punishment" site. It isn't really a punishment site and isn't really a "play" punishment site because the scenes are not set up to depict playful punishment or any kind of real bondage. The images they use for the teasers are rarely representative of the sets. That teaser advertising video you see every place where the girl is getting abused by a bunch of guys? It is in fast motion and I can't seem to find it on the site.
60 sets.
What I was hoping for was some kind of bedroom bondage or playful punishment site. This is neither because it tries to be much more serious than it is. The images show girls tied up in what could be fun for both partners. Then the videos makes it out like the girl is being punished for writing about another guy or doing something that the guy didn't like. But throughout the scene the girl isn't tied down and clearly has to be in control of things to have sex. She looks like she's upset, but it is usually pretty bad acting. In the meantime, the guy is yelling at her like he's teaching her some kind of lesson. Lame.
60 sets.
There are a couple of sets that look pretty interesting at first, like a wax-play set where the girl is tied down and looks like she is enjoying herself. He leaves her hands tied to the bed and gives it to her, then there is a fairly ordinary, not particularly memorable traditional sex scene...well, except that they guy is fairly aggressive...like he is in most sets. I remember that.
Perhaps this is the most compelling argument why you might want to skip this site. The highest member-rated score on the entire site is 95%. Only 8 of the scenes on the site rank 90% or higher. Translation: a lot of people who paid to join the site do not believe the material is first rate....because it isn't.
The guys who run this site and/or direct these sets seem to be trying pretty hard to make this work and they aren't doing a bad job considering the limited resources they must have. But in this day of kink.com and hogtied dominating the BDSM scene, they need to adjust either their name or their format a little to avoid misleading a lot of users. It looks like they've tried several different things in an effort to find a niche, but they have not really found it yet.
Bottom line: You might like this site if you like the fake interview sites or other fake B&D sites. The price is cheap, but there are some slightly better sites in this genre.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good quality VR videos
Young Attractive European models
Several resolutions available.
Navigation is straightforward
Images provided are representative of vids.
Cons:
Site is small (34 vids)
Navigation is extremely basic
Video download selection process is a little cumbersome.
50%+ of vids are observation only.
No release dates or schedule
No scoring
several formats, but they are not very consistent
Bottom Line:
OK, real quick....
RealJam is another start-up VR video provider based out of Budapest using Eastern European models. They are still pretty small, but so far they are doing things pretty well in terms of production.
RealJam Stats:
About 34 videos
About 18 models
Formats include Gear, Oculus/Vive, smartphone.
Largest format for Vive/Oculus is about 3200x1800 but not all vids are that high.
Videos average about 10 minutes.
Largest format file sizes are about 2-2.5 gigs
(That is shorter and smaller than most)
Download speeds are good.
Overview:
When you log in, you get get a listing of videos with representative images and download options right on the listing page. There are 4 videos per page and there are currently 9 pages, so that's about 36 videos. Each model actually produces 2 or 3 videos. At least one is an observational strip show/masturbation video and the others are participatory. They don't always fall in sequence.
Sets are nicely done, high end with no real distractions...large homes or hotel suites. Lighting is generally good. There is almost always a kind of funky logo prop someplace visible in the room that Say's Real Jam with the sylized Ass made out of the L in Real and the J and Jam. Kind of clever.....kind of. That logo tells me these are all made by the crew and not brought in by an independent and purchased.
I find selecting a download format to be kind of clunky and have accidentally downloaded the wrong format more than once. For each video, there are 4 tabs across the top for the format (Gear, Oculus, Vive and Smartphone). Within each tab are the resolutions available for that format. Oculus and Vive are always the same and could easily be combined. What trips me up is that I think I hit the Vive tab and then hit the high-resolution format to download, then move on to look at the next set. It isn't until the file is downloaded that I realize I forgot to hit the Vive tab before downloading. The tab option is a reasonable approach, but there should be some way to see all or choose a default. Before I realized what I was doing wrong, I opened a Gear video thinking it was the best they had and was very disappointed.
Let's see....The models act pretty well and are directed well. There is a surprising amount of English dialog (monologue, really) with heavy eastern European accents. It doesn't detract from the videos any, though,...probably adds a little, especially since the dialog is generally pretty polite. You know, "You like?" and "You want to see?" kind of stuff.
The video releases are not dated, which I find a little frustrating. And as I mentioned, the resolution varies sometimes between videos.
Bottom line: For $20, go ahead and jump right in! It is well worth it for the collection of quality videos that they have.
From the site format, this might be a bait site.
Really small collection (23 videos)
Ultra basic navigation
Section called VR VOD where other vids are $10 each. Nice try. I'll wait for VR chat rooms.
No update schedule
Videos are not dated
Videos are not scored.
No search function
No model listing.
Bottom Line:
As VR sites go, this is a really small one, but the VR and actress quality is not bad.
This site is owned by the same group that owns Naughty America. That site includes VR but the actresses used are mature, established porn stars. From what I can tell, in an effort to generate more revenue, they separated out the "teen" VR from the mainstream stuff you can get at Naughty America and created this site. Kudos to those folks because people like me will join this site, even if it is only for a month....or for the few hours it takes to pull down every video on this site. What I really don't like, and am going to score accordingly for, is that the site creators went a little too far and created what appears to be a bait site. A bait site is a site designed to attract subscriptions with no clear intentions of maintaining the site beyond a certain point or providing ongoing, regular updates for the subscribers. Yes, this site has some good quality VR videos of young actresses, as advertised, but there is no clear indication of how often, if at all, the site is or has been updated and the site could very easily have just been created to suck money out of people looking for teen VR. A legitimate site lists release dates. A legitimate site provides regular updates. A legitimate site does not include a "store" selling 50 additional VR videos not shown on the site for $10 each. 50 additional VR videos! Ten...Dollars...Each!? And I'm not even counting the ubiquitous ads to join Naughty America with a single click. To be fair, these might all be oversights on the part of the webmasters, but they are huge, glaring, troubling oversights.
Real Teen VR Stats:
23 videos.
23 models (all single girl sets)
One fairly representative image per set
No zips or screencaps
Videos are not dated
No indication of new release frequency
Videos available in most VR formats.
File sizes are not listed.
These are actually pretty good VR videos. They are shot in the exact same style as the VR videos at Naughty America, probably because they are the same company and these videos were originally slated to go there. I did a review of the VR at Naughty America VR and many of those points apply here.
All videos are VR viewer participatory (i.e. you fuck her)
Most videos start (with you) prone and end up actively upright.
The Actresses are a little too talkative.
Some videos have drop-outs and/or abrupt transitions that hinder the VR experience.
The models are 18-19. Although youth is beauty in today's society, several of these girls are young but not beautiful.
Bottom line: Mixed. For $20, it is probably an acceptable site to visit for one month just to pull down the 23 videos. But the site appears to be a bait site designed specifically to get your money for those videos and never provide anything more.
If you are the webmaster for this site, feel free to prove me wrong by providing past release dates, upcoming release schedules and regular updates to the site. I will gladly change my review and score.
I'm looking at this site and realize it is a pay-per-download site, which is simply not an acceptable site format in my book. A single download costs $9.95, with 5 videos costing $24.99 or $4.99 each. They have over 120 videos, so that means you would pay $600 to get them all. No thanks.
With so many other great VR sites, the idea that I'm spending at least $5 a video at this site is ridiculous. Some of the videos look pretty good, too, but I wont be visiting until the pricing model changes.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very high quality material, often outstanding.
Beautiful, natural models
Many Met Art models but also many unique models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Part of the Met Art network but a separate site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Everybody looks relaxed and comfortable
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
Many popular European models
Good site layout and navigation
Met-Art single sign-on means you can get here from there without having to log in.
Cons:
Not much bad here.
Site updates 4 times a week but more frequent updates in prior years.
Like some other MA sites, videos can be a little snoozy
Site navigation is not quite as versitile as Met Art but it is still very good.
Occasional issues with sign-ups for existing network members.
Bottom Line:
This is a single photographer, mostly images site that is part of the Met Art network but is marketed and billed separately. Rylsky is a top-notch photographer and the work presented here is an extension of the work he(?) publishes at Met Art. Sometimes there will be a video from a photo session published at Met Art. Sometimes the sets are from the same shoot day in a different location and sometimes the sets are of beginning or hopeful models and for whatever reason this set didn't make it over to Met Art. This includes MANY models that are extremely popular on Met Art from when they were just beginning.
Stats (Deduced because the numbers are not published):
About 2000 photo sets
About 200 videos
About 300 models
4 updates a week but prior hears had near daily updates.
The site has been around since 2012
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, etc.
All sets are dated.
All sets are scored.
images and zips come in 3 sizes up to 3000x4500.
Videos come in multiple sizes and formats.
Note that this is a relatively softcore solo model site with a few girl/girl scenes. There is no sex, there are no couples, there is no insertion, masturbation, etc. On the other hand, the girls are not shy, there are very few props, hardly any clothes (most sets start naked or very nearly naked) and the shots range from full body shots to close-ups. There are frequent open legged shots, a few naturally open labia and a moderate number of sets that include mild spreading. The girls are generally shaved or close cropped, but there are a few hairy girls. In general, if you enjoy admiring beautiful women in all types of settings, poses and positions, this is a good place to get unobstructed views of the wonderful female form.
These sets are of the same quality as the Met Art sets, meaning they are usually excellent. Good lighting, focus, composition and exposure. The models here are just as beautiful and often just as open as they are over at Met Art. Many of the same models are here, so if there are some you like at Met Art, they will probably be here too. Sometimes they are early sets and sometimes they are current.
Every time I look through this site I see something wonderful. Looking through the site to write the review, I found two models (Liv and Henrietta, both from 2014) that are absolutely mesmerizing. Plenty of world class models here like Emily Bloom, Astrud, Nancy and Halley. Thee is simply no zooming through this site. Nearly every set thumbnail becons you to slow down, look more closely, take it all in. Enjoy your time with these beautiful women.
Current sets are about 80% popular models and 20% fresh faces. Sometimes the fresh models look very young but for the most part, models seem to be in their early 20s.
Navigation is basically the same as Met Art with one important exception. Although there are user options so you can customize your experience, there is no option to open images in a new page like there is on Met Art. This means that image browsing is single threaded and you end up having to backpage to get back to sets or the update page. You can right-click of course, but it is clunkier than it should be. Making navigation on all of the Met Art network sites the same should be a priority for them. I am a member of 6 MA sites and there are some inconsistencies in site design and navigation that make it frustrating when switching between them.
On the plus-side, Met Art uses a single-sign on to their sites. Once you sign into a new site under it, you no longer have to log into that site individually. To facilitate this, there is a navigation pull-down that can get you to any of the sites in the network. There is also a "status" page that allows you to see all of your subscription details and you can even sign up for or cancel subscriptions right from this pull-down. This is a very nice solution to an often vexing problem.
The only reason I'm not giving this site a higher score is because of the relatively infrequent updates (4 new sets a week) compared to the top-billed site on the nework, Met Art.
There is one other issue you should be aware of. If you are already a member of one of the Met Art sites, the single sign-on sometimes limits your "new subscriber" options to a higher rate. If this happens, use a different email or contact support.
Bottom line: If you like the Met Art style of photography, which I personally think is among the best on the planet, you will not be dissappointed by this site. I have been a member for a couple of months now and still have not been able to look at everything since the last time I was here. If you look around, you can find it for $19 a month. PU has a special right now for only $9.95 a month. FOR GOD'S SAKE, MAN, JUST DO THAT! Plan on spending at least 2 months here. There is a ton of excellent material and you won't want to miss a thing. Highly recommended
Hey. Thanks for the review. I have been a member of this and pretty much all the MA sites off and on (and some continuously) since they were new and never really thought of this as "glam porn", but I guess perhaps it might be. I've always thought of glam porn as that photography stuff in the early 2000s and earlier with heavily made-up models. (Playboy-soft and Penthouse-medium maybe) This is....something different...something that needs it's own defintion...which they tried to do with the name Sexart. But the idea that it is not hard, rough or in any way crude is dead-on correct. So let's come up with a new name! :-)
Oh, and depending on the device or browser you are using, you can make the text pretty big. :-))
OK, first of all, there have been no new anal scenes that I can find since the few that were posted in 2014. So if you are avoiding the site because you don't like anal, go ahead and join up.
Second, to the webmaster. The marketing and page positioning of the additional-purchase "Staff Selection" videos is annoying and insulting. On at least one page (streaming), there is no indication at all that the video is an axtra cost purchase until you click on it and see the option for the preview and offer to purchase. I subscribe to many of the Met Art sites (6 currently) and this is the only one that tries to sell me extra videos. On this MA site, the spot normally reserved for the newest video or photo shoot is always occupied by this bait Staff Selection video. Just fricking STOP IT! If you want to sell videos seperately, establish a site for that or at least put them over on the side where you market the live site. We know you have the resources to do that. You guys have terrific sites! Don't cheapen them by doing things that some of the other, sleazier sites try.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High quality video and photos of sex scenes and solo scenes. Many Met-Art models but a lot less tame.
Excellent production quality.
Excellent navigation.
Part of the Met Art Network so you know what to expect.
Terrific customer service.
Excellent download speeds
Multiple image size and video file formats
settable user options for navigation and viewing (like Met Art)
All sets are named and dated.
Cons:
Really very few.
Marketing for the webcam partner is very prominent and the auto-dropdown for this is truly annoying.
They've starting this odd bait tactic called "Staff Selection", where they insert a preview video in prominent locations (it looks just like a set). You click on it and discover it is only a preview. Then they want to SELL you the video separately from your membership. The ad for the most recent video-for-sale shows up on every single set listing page. I truly hope this dies quickly. The videos are no different from other Met-Art network videos and this practice is so annoying that it makes me want to quit the site.
Many of the sex videos are highly stylized. (surreal as opposed to real)
Many of the solo models lose eye contact with the camera when they start getting into themselves.
Bottom Line:
As a frame of reference, I am a very, very long term member of Met Art and a couple of other sites in the network, but I recently realized I have not been a member of Sex Art since 2012. I'm happy to say a lot has changed on this site since 2012!
The site uses the tagline "Erotoc Cinema for discerning adults" but there are far more image sets than there are videos. For me, that isn't a bad thing at all.
As others have said, this is Met Art, only harder. Here you will find nearly all of the models you would see at Met Art, except here the no touching, no fingering, no inserting, no spreading, and no boy-girl fucking rules are gone. Many of the models are still just solo, but they are much more open. Much.
Somebody mentioned back in 2013 or so that they were doing anal on this site. I did not notice any Anal scenes and a search for anal only brought up a few things from 2013. I don't really care for anal so this is a good thing on my list. Just so you know...no anal here.
If you are a Met-Art subscriber, have you ever clicked on a thumbnail because the image looked great only to find that the lower half of the model is completley out of focus? Well, that sort of depends on the photographer but I can tell you that here it doesn't happen nearly as much. Many of the images here are sharp from head to toe and every bit as good, sometimes better than those at Met Art.
The models, of course, are Met Art quality, top notch European models. Nearly all are in the 18 to 25 category. Generally slender, some are curvy and some are OMFG gorgeous. They seem a little more playful here with a little more eye contact. And when you throw in that these sets include a lot more shots of, for example, fingering, spreading and generally open labia, then this site becomes a lot more pleasant. Many of the girls do tend to forget about the camera when they start getting into themselves, though. This is fairly common for models that are not full-out porn stars.
The videos are sort of a mixed bag and I'm not entirely sure why. Met Art in general tends to stylize their videos and many of these are theme based. The sex in many of these videos is ok, but it doesn't draw you in and hold you like more hardcore stuff can. (There are some notable exceptions, though, where the guy just bangs the hell of the girl like there ar no cameras at all...and it is really good.) Some of the solo scenes are also very good, starting with a stroll down the beach or something and ending with a vibrator induced orgasm with a lot of close-ups along the way. Is it real? Who cares! It often looks pretty real! The girl/girl scenes are also much more realistic, with the girls clearly performing acts on eachother, as opposed to just holding hands and looking like they are sisters, again with an ample number of close-ups along the way.
Here are some quick stats (from what I can figure): As of 2/23/18
895 videos
1,259 photo sets
549 models
49 photographers/videographers
One new set every day.
As far as niche, that is difficult to define. I would put it in with Watch4Beauty.com or maybe MPLstudios as both of those sites use popular, beautiful Eauropean models and put no restrictions on activities.
Bottom line: If you like the models at Met Art but are looking for something a little more open, a little more exposed, a little harder, then this is the site you are looking for. I would say join for a month, but honestly, there is way too much good material here, so take a longer term deal if you can find it. I may add this to my annual subscription list.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High quality video and photos of sex scenes and solo scenes. Many Met-Art models but less softcore.
Cons:
Not enough content, although it is improving. Navigation is not consistent with Met-Art.
Bottom Line:
This is basically all the stuff that the photogrpahers wanted to shoot for Met-Art, but the relatively softcore nature of that site prevented them from publishing it. Or...to put it another way...it is a way for Met-Art to expand thier network and make more money without having to use anything more than ask the assets they already have to have sex, which many of them do on other sites anyway.
The emphasis is on glamorous sex scenes but there are a lot of solo acts and decent photo sets with all kinds of toys. The girls, of course, are awesome....as usual for this network. The only problem is that there still is nowhere near enough material.
Navigation is fine for a small site, but when it gets big, they will need to switch over to the same system they use for Met-Art. For this site, you have to page forward and back to get anywhere quickly, or you can follow the "back to gallery" links...which ever is your preference. I have accidently left the site many times because I thought I was on Met-Art.
The cross-advertising is still very frustrating.
They cross-advertised based on models and photographers, so at the bottom of a page, you will see a link back to Met-Art or one of the other sites in the network (all charging separately).
I was fortunate enough to see this site for $12.50 because I was already a member at Met-Art. Look for bundle packages and consider doing one $12.50 secondary Met-Art site at a time because there just isn't enough content here for you to keep all four $12.50 sites for long.
Overall, this is a pretty good site, especially if you get in on a package deal. But it won't be a great site until they get a lot more content.
You see a nice girl on one site, there is a picture of her from another set at teh bottomfg
I just rejoined this site and am really annoyed at how slow the downloads are. First download takes an hour and forget about queuing any other downloads up because they have a throttle allowing only one download at a time. Several times I queued up multiple downloads and only got the SBVR intro in the file and nothing else. The video quality is good and the girls are hot but the download issues are a deal killer for me.
Am I the only one getting insanely slow downloads?
I did not renew my 1 year membership because the file download speeds from this site were so slow. (30-40 mins for 7gb and only one file at a time actively downloads). I decided to join back up and see that downloads are still slow. 1-file download speeds are 3-5mb/s. Download speeds for my set up peg at 200mb/s so it is not my cable company, LAN or PC. For comparison, WanksVR and BaDoink files both download at about 9-11mb/s. Is anyone else experiencing really slow downloads from SexBabesVR?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Best video quality of any VR site
High-def (4K) 3D VR videos
Mostly Popular, very attractive European models
A few beautiful models I haven't seen elsewhere
Mostly participatory videos
These vids are VERY well directed. Girls that can be so-so elsewhere are AMAZING here.
Very high entertainment level: The girls are into the scenes.
Very fast download speeds
Good navigation
Release dates are posted
Videos are subscriber-scored on a 10 point scale.
Cons:
Still a pretty small site
Some videos are observational (i.e. watch b/g sex)
A few videos start participatory, but switch to observational.
No streaming or previews (minor for this format)
No zip files of photos or captures but a few representative images for each set (minor)
Tags listed with videos are not searchable.
A few girls make a little too much noise but a genuinely quiet compared to some other sites.
Bottom Line:
I just added a few points to the score because, after watching every single VR video on this site, I can honestly say they are ALL very good to excellent. The girls are beautiful, the sets/locations are spectacular and well thought out (several scenes even have a strategically placed mirror that gives you nice views when the girl is heads-down.), the direction is outstanding and the new vids since I've been a member have been killer. This is the very definition of VR porn. I don't say this lightly: BEST VR SITE ON THE INTERNET! OK, back to original review.
=============================
Yeah, this is pretty much what every VR site should emulate.
There are a couple of videos on this site that will absolutely blow you away. One, with Nancy A, is probably the best VR video I have seen so far on any site. She's a frequent model on Met Art and does sex scenes on a few sites, but she really shines here like nowhere else. A few other models are at their best here, too.
SexBabesVR Stats: (as of 2/1/17)
About 40 videos
26 models
Updates every 3 or 4 days
Formats include Gear, Oculus/Vive low and high, and smartphone low and high
60 FPS typical
Highest resolution is 3840x1920
Typical video is about 23 minutes
Typical file size is about 5 gigs.
Videos include tags
3D Video format is Left/Right
Most videos start with the male prone, include a cowboy/reverse cowboy and end up with him in an upright missionary or doggie style with a pull-out or handjob money shot. Several sets includessome in-your-face views and all of them are good.
The sets are upscale and attractive but not distracting, the lighting is perfect, the models are nicely done but not overly done up, they are well directed and it looks like they are enjoying themselves. Conversation is minimal and the males in the scenes do not make any sound. Most sets open with music and a brief set-up of some sort. Some of these are surprisingly good and I found myself saying "Woa!" as I realized the ungodly gorgeous girl in front of me was about to virtually fuck me.
Lucky, lucky me!
Overall, the site and videos have the look and feel of Wow-girls but there is no affiliation to any other site that I can find and the domain owners are different. This is a well run, site, though, so I'm pretty sure somebody with other sites and a lot of resources is running it. Good for them, GREAT for those of us with VR gear.
Bottom line: although small, the quality here is among the best anywhere. This site is setting the bar. (I would score it higher, but it is still very small.) Go ahead and join for a month. it is totally worth it to see just how good high quality VR can be. I'll be back around at least annually....assuming I cancel, which I'm not sure I will do.
I just joined this site and will try to write a review soon. It looks like it might be a WowGirls spin-off or something similar. Layout and color scheme is the same. About 40 videos, most are participatory. Video quality is the best VR I've seen so far. Really well done! The scene with Nancy A is so good I swear I can smell her.
I agree with you about softcore videos, but it often depends on the model. Girl-in-the-woods or girl-in-her-room videos tend to be pretty boring and contrived and waaaay too many models that look amazing in images lose all kinds of points when you see them move. I've seen some very good softcore where the model is clearly trying to turn the viewer on, but I didn't see any of that here. (Twisty's or the first videos in a set from In The Crack come to mind.) When you say France I think Anna AJ from Met Art who had several drool-worthy videos. There are a couple of other models on MA that are just nice to watch because they are graceful (Annett A, Lorena B., etc.) but that is about beauty, not arousal (well, ok watching a beautiful , reclining girl put her legs straight out to the side and over her head can be pretty arousing...). These days, I'm not into "regular" porn video much as observing two other people have sex isn't that exciting anymore unless the girl is an 11 AND a great actress who doesn't pull faces and moan unnaturally. Instead I like POV and, when I can, VR scenes that are all about a virtual partner and, you know, ME!! :-) We are so jaded.....
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
HUGE Exclusive content
Some exclusive models
Wide variety of models in all shapes and sizes.
Many top European models
Some very early sets of current popular models
Tons of content (Since 2011, over 900 models)
Good quality images
Generally good quality videos
Cons:
Navigation is OK, but sometimes annoying.
Many videos are so so.
Some photo sets are so so.
Some popular models have videos only.
Some models only have one set.
Silly props in some sets.
Many models have assigned names that don't match other sites.
Headshots are sometimes not representative of material.
Individual image file names are not unique.
Bottom Line:
Showy Beauty is a non-Met-Art sister site to Amour Angels. (Some of the sets even have props that say Amour Angels.) This site has pretty much EVERY met-art model, mostly in sets shot before they became uber-popular, plus a bunch of sets of models that only shot one or two sets and maybe a handful that didn't make the cut to be on Met Art for one reason or another. The site is not part of the Met Art network but, as I said, has many models that appear on MA and probably shares several photographers. There is a very broad variety of model here. In addition to several hundred european models, there are a handful of asian models, some south american models and a few (I think) pacific island models. A LOT of models I've never seen elsewhere and I have been around a bit. Most models are young looking and petite, although several are more significant and quite chesty. A veritable smorgasboard of shapes and sizes. There are a lot of popular models here, mostly from early shoots. The majority of the models are shaved but some have very mild or trimmed pubic hair. Models like Emily Bloom and Sarena Woods are on Showy Beauty and there are a few others that you honestly would not recognize at first because they look so different. A few popular Met Art models only have videos here and I suspect that is because the matching photo sets made it to a Met Art site. This is not a B-roll site, exactly, but much of the material is similar to the stuff you would find on the met-art secondary sites. The difference is there is more variety here.
Showy Beauty is fairly true to the name, but don't expect anything too extreme. Each model is different. Some models are modest, some open their legs and a very very few have open labia.
This is JUST a solo girl model site with an occasional two or three girl "friends" set. There is no sex, no masturbation, no insertion. Even eye contact varies quite a bit between sets and models. The emphasis, for the most part, is simply admiration of the beautiful nude female form.
The site is posting images and videos as far back as 2011. They have been posting a photo or video set every other day since then, so that means there are, what, roughly 1200+ sets. There are over 750 models. It is a LOT of material. You can sort by top models, top sets or update date and you can go directly to a specific year and month. Sets are dated and model and photographer names are listed. (About 90 photographers, some of whom I am sure shoot for other major sites.) Models are ranked on a user-generated 10 point scale, but the scale seems pretty whacky to me. Most models are in the 5 to 7 range and many top Met Art models are toward the bottom of the rankings. This may be because the sets of the top models are not as high quality or revealing or just because not very many people vote. There are a LOT of pretty teen models here. Like Met Art and some similar sites, Showy Beauty gets content from many photogaphers so there is a great deal of variety in sets, lighting etc., but image quality is typically very good.
Navigation is generally good and download speeds are good but the site is a little clunky at times. Photo sets are presented in multiple pages and there is no way to change it. Navigation "Buttons" throughout the site change color when you hover over them, but they do nothing unless you click on the actual text within the button you want. Super annoying. Zip files have unique names but individual images, either downloaded or in the zip files, don't. File names are "Showy Beauty-001.jpg" to Showy Beauty-xxx.jpg, telling you nothing about the set, model, date, etc. Very frustrating if you keep a "best of" folder. ALL items...sets, models, images, etc., open in the same page so you are single threaded and have to ckick "back" a lot unless you remember to open in a new tab.
Because these models are not very experienced, many sets have little or rather tentative eye contact. There is a fair amount of outdoor "girl in the woods" type shooting. Most more recents sets are very well done with plenty of eye contact and, sometimes, fairly revealing poses. Images come in three sizes and videos come in 4 formats (2 mp4 sizes, a WMV and a DIVX format) plus streaming. The resolution of the videos is not listed,although the few files I pulled down were 720 or better. Ther is no 4K. Image sets have from about 70 to about 180 images. Videos are 10-20 minutes with the model undressing and frolicking around. Honestly, the videos are not terribly exciting but the view is usually pretty good.
Bottom Line: If your tastes run toward young, psuedo-amatuer or early-career pro models of all shapes and sizes, then this is a site you should visit. There is a TON of material and some of it is quite good. I searched for discounts and found one for $19.95. At that price, there is a lot to like here.
I thought I'd write a comment here just in case anyone thinks no review means this site might be worth it. In this case it isn't.
I am constantly getting unidentified anonymous spam from this site and others in this network. Anonymous spam....the worst possible kind. I've joined enough sites to know that when a legitimate site emails you, there is a link back to the site and there is an option to unsubscribe. Not with these emails. They are completely anonymous and say something like "(your name here), you won't believe this." Never, ever trust a solicitation to an adult site that does not adhere to ethical business practices. "Ethical" in this case means they properly identify who they are, what they want and how you can tell them to buzz off if you want to.
Now...about the site. At some point, I was a little curious about "Watch my Girlfriend" and another site in this network, so I joined. $30 totally and completely wasted. The "Network" recycles many of the same images across many sites. A significant number of images (look closely at a few on the Sluts with Phones teaseer page) are NOT EVEN REAL PHOTOS! Many are photoshopped. Many of the images were....obtained elsewhere and reposted. And the vast majority of them are not nude. There are no regular releases of new material and the material that is there is not organized with dates. What you get is a very small collection of crappy images. The ones on the teaser page are the best of the bunch. The rest are "user submissions" or somthing to that effect.
Although the concept seems interesting, I am practically certain that the only objective of this network is to hit-and run with your wallet. There are a lot of really excellent sites that will set you back far less than this garbage. You generally can't go wrong with the high scoring sites reviewed here at PU.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High quality material
Beautiful, natural, mostly very young models
Many Met Art models but also many unique models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Part of the Met Art network but a separate site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
All European models
Good site layout and navigation
Met-Art single sign-on means you can get here from there without having to log in.
Cons:
Overall quality and update frequency has declined somewhat in the last 6 months.
No consistency in release timing or between videos and image sets.
Only one set a week lately and 3 of 4 November releases were videos.
Overall site quality is not as good as it once was.
Site navigation is not quite as versitile as Met Art but it is still very good.
Occasional issues with sign-ups for existing network members.
Model names are not consistent with the rest of the Met Art network.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to go a littel Jeckyl and Hyde in this review. Bear with me.
Stats (Deduced because the numbers are not published):
About 1000 photo sets
About 260 videos
About 200 models
1 update a week but prior to 2018, there were 4 updates a week.
The site has been around since 2013
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, etc.
All sets are dated.
All sets are scored.
images and zips come in 3 sizes up to 3000x4500.
Videos come in multiple sizes and formats.
Stunning 18 is one of the satellite web sites in eh Met Art network established, I think, for the photographer Antonio Clemens.
This is the third or fourth time I've joined this site and I have to say I'm pretty disappointed since the last time I joined. Apparently, Antonio Clemens is no longer shooting for Met Art and, since this was essentially his site, they are scrambling to keep things going. The last time one of his sets was published was in September but it appears that his sets since April or May were from the files. Thierry Murell has stepped in, but things have changed....alot!
The number of releases has dropped to one a week, which is pretty awful considering the release schedule was 4 times a week just a year ago. And the sets that are being released are...inconsistent with the prior theme of the site and not up to the prior quality of this site or of the Met Art network. Some sets look like they were borrowed from ALSscan and some others seem like odd videos. Here's another example and this one is DAMN WEIRD! 5 sets in August, 7 sets in July, 8 sets in June and 8 sets in May. These were the last sets by Antonio Clemens and ALL OF THESE 28 SETS EXCEPT 1 were of the SAME MODEL! Now, the model is Irene and she is beautiful, but some of these "sets" were partials and the next release would be the rest. Like I said, this is just weird, especially for a site in the Met Art network. You would think they would have the collective resources to keep this site up and get it looking right again after 6 months.
Now, aside from this relatively recent weirdness, there is a lot of great 18-22 YO material here from before about May of 2018 all the way back to January of 2013. About 60-70% of the models are young, pretty and many of these models are girls you will not see elsewhere. You can tell they are new and, although there may be a few open-legged shots, you can also see that many have not yet found their confidence. All of those prior sets between 2013 and earlier this year were shot by Antonio Clemens. They are consistent and generally very good. Focus, lighting, sets, exposure, poses, etc. are all excellent.
The other 30-40% of the models in these sets are maybe a little older and much, much more experienced and open. For example, Anjelica, the pretty young porn star, has 8 videos and 3 photo sets from 2013-2015. She's not shy at all. Melena A, the little cat-tattooed gymnast turned flexy nude model is here with 17 fairly early sets, mostly photo sets. Her first set is called "Juicy Pussy". It is an accurate title but it easily could have been applied to any of her sets. There are others here, too, like 21 sets from the glam-style model Danica Jewels, here called Delilah G., and 24 videos from the wonderful naked ballarina Annett A. You get my point. The pre-2018 stuff on this site is a wonderful blend of young, light, fresh, delicate, sometimes a little shy beauties and OMG sexy porn stars and experienced, confident models that usually know how to give you what you are looking for.
This is another of the Met-Art sites that almost has the same navigation as Met-Art, but not quite. There is no option to open anything in another window. As a result, you have to either do this manually, or back up a lot. It really needs to be the same for all of these sites.
Although pricing is separate for each of the Met Art sites, they do have a nifty single sign-on feature that allows you to access any of the MA sites that you are a member of via a little pull-down menu on the main Met Art site. Once you log in using this option, the sight keeps track of you and allows access to any othe site you have subscribed too. Nice feature.
There is one other issue you should be aware of. If you are already a member of one of the Met Art sites, the single sign-on sometimes limits your "new subscriber" options to a higher rate than the one you asked for. If this happens, use a different email or contact support.
OK, almost out of room. Bottom line: In spite of the recent failings, there is a TON of great material here. If you haven't visited this site yet, there is a holiday special of only $9.95. For that price, joining is a no brainer. I will keep an eye on this site and update the score and recommendation accordingly when the site theme and new material quality stabilizes. For now it is recommended with some reservations regarding new material.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good variety
Several niche sites
Many attractive models and porn stars
Video quality is generally good
Navigation generally good
Good search functions
Cons:
You get one update a day for ALL sites
Many sites have not been updated in YEARS!
"Premium" sites you are supposed to pay more for.
Bottom Line:
Have you ever noticed how on some web sites, there will be an article that looks interesting, so you click on it, only to find that the actual article has a slightly different name and you've read it before? That's how I've signed up to Team Skeet 2 or 3 times in the past couple of years...by not realizing I've been been here before..because that's what the webmasters want you to think. That sounds a little odd, I know, but the individual sites don't advertise as "Team Skeet". They advertise as one of the many sub-sites under the umbrella of "Paper Street Media". (Even PU doesn't immediately show this as a network...you have to go to a site and then look at the company profile to see the sites in the network.) Most recently, I got pulled in by "The Real Workout" which looks like a site full of fit models working out and then getting boned. The site is listed separately and gives no real indication it is part of the Skeet network. What it doesn't tell you on the teaser page is that you are looking at EVERY video on the site..73 videos in total SINCE 2007!!!! That's one video a month and some are tiny! I was duped. Consolation prize? Team Skeet and access to all of the same stuff I purchased as part of "Exxxtra Small", another sub-site, 2 months ago.
To be fair, it does look like they provide 1 new set a day these days, but I can't really tell. What I do see is 2088 sets TOTAL across all the sites and the earliest sets date to 2005. That is 4 sets a week for 10 years. Oh, and this is almost 100% video. There are no images of sets.
The quality of material is generally pretty good but it is mostly shot in little skits. Think classroom, dorm room, office, car, gym, etc. the solos are done in hotel rooms, mostly. As a result, the lighting is not always great, the settings are OK and the scenes are usually very real-world-ish. (Not necessarily what I'm personally looking for in a sex scene).
The names of the sub-sites are about as self-explanatory as can be. Titty Attack, Teen's Love Money, POV Life, Teen Curves, This Girl Sucks, Teens Love Anal, Teeny Black, Exxxtra Small, Innocent High, the list goes on and on...at one update a month per site for many of these sites. And I also notice that many of the videos could be on any of the sites, it's just the way the video is edited.
The models are generally 18-24-ish, good looking and professional. Many are porn stars or video starlets. The top rated girls are Riley Reid, Cassidy Banks, Lola Foxx and Kaylee Haze, all in sets dated 2014 or 2015.
Navigation is OK. You can see all updates or you can drill into a particular site and see what is there. You can search by model or keyword/tag and there is a list of tags down the left hand site of the main page.
There is a LOT of cross selling. the skeet live-models site take up the top of every page. Other sites are listed down the right side and along the bottom. That leaves about 50% of the main pages for listing things that are actually on the site you have paid for and are looking at.
Bottom line? I would classify this as similar to Porn Pros, Pornstar Network or maybe 18 girls. It is an all video site that is worth visiting once. But once you do visit, double check to make sure the next site you stumble over isn't just this book with a slightly different cover.
Thanks for the review! I checked my archive and see I last joined this site in 2009 and have images back to 2006, so the site has been around a while. Back then the models were European and American, the shoots were done in more of a "glam" style and the images and video were comparable to Twisty's or One-girl-a-day. It is interesting how that recent "russian" factor is so unpopular with western Europeans and Americans. When I joined a similar site with a lot of unknown Czech models, they all had neon eye shadow. Some girls can pull-off the fun clown-clothing clothing look just like some can-pull-off (I guess that was a pun...) the school-girl uniform look, but most can't. I'll put this on my list and look for discounted rates. 9 years of material should keep me entertained for a while....
Thought I'd mention two things here. First, the VR porn videos are generally pretty good. I did a separate review of TMWVR here on PU if you are interested. Second, all of the recent videos that are shot for VR are ALSO available in non-VR. That is really pretty smart for a site like this. So if you are reading the prior comments about frequent VR updates at the expense of non-VR updates, don't worry about it. All of the newer sets are available in non-VR.
I just joined again to pull down their VR content and, yes, you are absolutely right. Lots and lots of body graffiti. Some of it is OK but most is over the top. I've said it before and I'll say it again, girls in porn that get tattoos absolutely don't understand why guys are watching them have sex. "Wow, I really love trying to read that poem on your shoulder while watching you give head" said no guy ever!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
