OK, first off, About half of the images are landscape. I prefer landscape images and I can tell you that there are some mind-blowing ones here.
Second, Amour Angels is not affiliated with W4B or any other popular site that I know of. I was a last a member of that site in 2014 or 2015, although for some reason it looks like I did not write a review for it. The site uses several of the same models that Met Art, Fem Joy and W4B uses, (Like Emily Bloom and Serena Wood) but they also have several models that I have not seen elsewhere. I would define Amour Angels as a professional site, but with more of a buble-gum kind of flavor. (Big flowers, hats, lots of props, etc.) Almost all solo and girl-girl posing, strictly softcore. Videos are just posing, laying around, female form stuff with some close-ups. The models are mostly cute, young, slender, petite...really young. (All ofthe girls are 18+.) The sets I have of popular models are from when thyey were just starting out. I just looked and I saved 229 sets and 29 videos, mostly because of the exclusive models not seen elsewhere. To answer your orientation question, there is also a good balance of landscape and portrait images here. The site may have changed a little since 2014-15, but this is what I have from then.
Hope that helps.
...Now I have to go back and join Amour Angels again. This time, I'll write a review!
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Site has been around since before 2005!
Excellent selection of top-tier, beautiful models
Exclusive content
Many of the most popular European models with a few specatcular exclusive models.
Several exclusive latin/ethnic models.
Models are open and uninhibited.
Lots of eye contact with the camera.
EVERY photo set has an acompanying video.
Navigation is generally very good
Multiple zip and video resolution options.
Multiple display options.
Available file size is up to 5600k
Most videos are now up to 1080p with some 4k.
All sets, including zips and videos, are uniquely named.
Cons:
Not much here.
Only 1 update every 2-3 days. (15 sets a month)
Navigation could be a little better.
There are a few "unconventional" beauties.
Sets are not dated on every thumbnail screen.
Bottom Line:
This is a mostly a solo girl site but there are a few things that make it different.
First, every photo set comes with a "behind the scenes" video. I'm usually not a big fan of videos taken during photo shoots, but these videos shed a little light on the models by showing personalities and interactions as well as shedding light on the photo shoot process. Any wannabe nude photographer should watch some of these.
Second, the girls in most of these sets are not shy in any way. We're talking legs-spread-so-far-their-toes-are-beyond-different-horizons open. Many of the sets are orgasm sets with spreading, insertions, giant two prong vibrators, etc. This is not Met Art. It's not even Sex Art. It is a place where many of those models go beyond softcore but still manage to look absolutely fantastic. Some of the girl/girl scenes are also very well done. Some of these sets make the girls look like sisters, but a few are really impressive. Clearly these girls are into each other, which makes it that much more interesting to watch.
Third, the photography. It is outstanding. Every inch of every model is in focus. None of that artsy-fartsy old-school soft-focus stuff here. Although they get pretty creative sometimes, you will NEVER see a model dressed like Marie Antoinette on this site. You will never see a set where the lighting is filtered through window blinds so you can't see the model. Every set...every inch...of every model...from pretty much every angle. Damn, that's nice. Now, there are occasionally instances where that is a mixed thing. Sorry in advance for the visual... There is one slender model with unbelievable breasts and an O-ring shaped labia. She actually lactates in one of her videos. Because they don't airbrush anything, you can see that her skin is fairly translucent so you can see veins. It's initally.....conflicting. In the end, the girls assets win and you will still want her, though. OK, enough of that!
Navigation is good, but it could be better. I think it is likely that the site just outgrew it. There are tags, but not user tags and you can't search on them. There are years worth of sets here but you can't, for example, go to the updates from June of 2014. You have to scroll back, sequentially, to get back that far. You can search on models and there is a model bio page for each model.
For sets, you pick a set and the page goes to the set with a cover photo, the video and between 45 and 90 images. Click on an image and it opens in a new "Viewing" window. Click on another image and the "viewing" window changes to the new image. Depending on the size image you chose, you can then click on the image to make it full size. You can always right click and open images in new windows if you want. This navigation style is better than most sites, but it could be improved. It would also be great to be able to more easily view the older material by allowing navigation to specific months. Of course, to do that, every set will need to have a date-stamp.
Oh, there is a blog section that highlights activities, new models and shoots. It can be interesting, but it ussually helps to show you models that are coming. Kind f a tease.
I have had an annual subscription to this site for a couple of years now and it is easily in my top 3 or 4. The site is huge now, so I'm scoring it up there with Met Art, Femjoy, Sex Art, Hegre and MPL Studios. The content is every bit as good as those sites.
I can't quite get a read on site stats because they are not published, but I will make estimates:
2378 sets/videos
about 250 models
I would have scored this site higher except for the minor navigation issues and the fact that it does not update daily. But the quality photography and videography still puts it among my top 3 or 4.
Bottom line: If you like solo models on sites like Met Art, Sex Art, Femjoy, JoyMii, MPLStudios and Hegre and are looking for something a little more hardcore, this is absolutely worth a visit.
I wrote a review back in January of last year and am very happy to say the old login/password issue is gone! The photography is even better than it was last year and the collection is simply excellent, among the best soft core on the Internet. Now if only they would update once or more daily....... If you have never been to this site, I highly recommend it!
Thanks! I try not to use DL managers because it tends to...dilute the best stuff with a whole lot of just OK stuff. I already have nearly 2 terrabytes of stuff collected since these sites first started appearing on the Internet and that's after I archived the oldest stuff.
That would make a good survey....how big is your collection...
Nearly all of the videos are behind-the-scenes sets of the photo shoots and are pretty short. A few were done separately at the photo shoot site with nice POV. It seems like the girls that have their own sub-sites have slightly better videos...Monika, for eexample. Nearly all of them are 2-3 minutes or less, probably to keep the size down. I think they are all 720p but a very few older sets, like some of those of the beautiful but retired Marketa, were remastered from lesser resolution. Most of the soundtracks are music and there at least a couple of older videos that have distracting animations or effects in them. Largest video file size I see is about 150k.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Excellent selection of beautiful models
Exclusive content
A few of the most popular European models
Nicely done, tasteful site
Navigation is good
Available file size is up to 5600k
Most videos are in 720p.
Cons:
Single biggest gripe is username/password management
Only one set added every other day or so.
Videos are mostly ho-hum.
Bottom Line:
I've been a member here a couple of times and keep forgetting to write a review. It is up there on the list of erotic/softcore photo sites, but just a tad below the frontrunners. Why? That's the hard part to explain.
Probably because the site only updates a few times a week and the collection is not yet maga-large. They've got about 350 models and maybe 1200 sets compared to, for example, Met Art's 2,000+ models and 12,500+ sets.
No hardcore sex. Just solo and girl girl scenes. BUT, there is a reasonable amount of in-your-face viewing, insertion, etc. and the girls in the girl-girl scenes seem pretty much into each other. Those attributes differentiate this site from FemJoy or MetArt,
There is a broad range of action in the photo sets. Same are nude girl in the woods, some are nude in public and some are girl getting off using her hands or toys. There are also a few peeing scenes if you are into that. There are far more toys in this site than in, say, Met Art. Maybe twenty percent of the sets have a toy involved, but it depends on the model and the toys seem to be included more as a prop than a utensil to be used for a specific purpose. In fact, there are a lot of sets where fruit and other things are included primarily for aesthetics.
The model's interaction with the camera is generally good. Each set has a mix of images with eye contact but this, too, depends on the model. A few of the videos are somewhat interactive but most are not. Many of the videos are just working the photo shoots. The amount of fun in the videos and shoots seems to depend on the model. The energy or playfulness in the sets tends toward reserved...again a function of the softcore genre..and the model.
The mix of indoor and outdoor scenes is good. The girls are mostly petite young Europeans, but there are a few Americans, a few latin americans and several full figured girls in the mix.
All images come batched in 2 zip file sizes and one PDF file compilation (really odd...), videos are a few minutes long and generally in 720p. You can get individual images in 5000x4000 or larger, but these are not in zip files.
Now there is one other interesting thing on this site that I would never have even looked at if it were not for the comments of another reviewer. It's the magazine. It serves a similar function as the tease blog on other sites, but the range of topics is a little broader and more entertaining. What happens, for example, when you give a camera to a model and put her in front of a big mirror? From what I can see, she learns it is harder than it appears to be a good photographer. But sadly, much of the beautiful photography in the magazine section is zipped or catalogued and is not yet available in the photo-sets section. One of the magazine writer's recent obsessions named Emily is not on the rest of the site at all. So it is a teaser blog after all, I guess.
The single most annoying thing about this site is the password management policy. You cannot pick your own username or password so you get a random, impossible to remember username and password that can't be changed. And then on top of that, the site implements protocols that prevent your browser from remembering the username/password. Be SURE to create a PDF of the confirmation page (or a link to ccbill, the biller) if you ever want to get into the site again once you sign up. I understand they don't want passwords to be shared, but the guy who came up with this strategy should be flogged...and not in a good way.
Other annoyances:
-Navigation within a photo set, i.e. going to the next or previous image, is only available if you select the smallest view size.
-All of the images in a set are numbered 001, 002, 003, etc. That might not be a huge problem if you download everything in zip format, but if you want to keep only yor favorate images of a model, be prepared to rename everyting or keep multiple folders. Not cool.
-Although many of the images are available at something like 5760x4800 (that's like 7 feet by 5 feet at 72dpi), many of these larger images either aren't very crisp or clear or they have artifacts in them. I'm not sure why that is because a few other sites that have very large images don't have this problem. Maybe it is the algorithm used to compress or resize the images from the very large raw format they are probably shot in....I don't know. What I do know is that the large images can be dissapointing and they should work on fixing this.
Bottom Line: The site is definitely worth an annual visit. There is a lot to sift through, but once you do sift through it, there may not be enough updates to keep you for more than a month or two. I plan on coming back once a year or so.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many top-notch and popular models
Excellent quality videos
Most videos are full 1080 HD
Good photo sets
Good navigation
Wide variety of models
Lets and lots of masturbation...
Pussy classification system is a hoot!
Lots of details about many of the models
Cons:
Not much variety of activities or sets
5 point voting system seems a bit off
Sort order on many pages seems random
no extra large images (2800x1867 max)
Not much depth (i.e. most models in only one set)
Models are often a little...un-made-up.
Many models don't interact with the camera much
Bottom Line:
Well, the best way to describe this site might be "Forget the foreplay, let's get to it!"
There is very little posing, no glam photography (i.e. not much make-up), not a single "naked girl in the woods" just a whole lot of "Here's a girl. Watch her masturbate!" And masturbate they do! Every single girl! Usually with multiple devices in each photo or video set.
This is also one of those sites where you are so drawn in by the masturbation scenes that you won't notice some of the other features right away. There are a lot of interview transcripts that seem reasonably genuine, but the translation from Russian seems a little too perfect to be 100% correct. They are entertaining, though. There are both "bonus" and an "extras" sections that contain additional sets, some of which are from other sites. Ah, yes, there is a LOT of cross selling advertising going on, but thankfully the webmasters have kept the ads to small banners except at the very bottom of some of the pages. The sites that are advertised are all quality sites and a few have "special offers" that one would not get if one were to go straight to, say, Twisty's. (The offers are about the same as the discounts the PU.com...)
There are a couple of bonus sites: "We like to Suck" and "Wet and Pissy". If that doesn't paint a picture for you, quit sniffing glue. Thay have basically the same layout and quality but are a little more specialized. Not really my cup of....whatever.
The webmaster and photo teams do a really good job of creating a genre and sticking to it. The scenes are well lit, well focused and generally good quality. They are all entirely indoors, apparently in a hotel bedroom or bathroom with a few scenes in a home someplace. In some of the sets, one of the videographers, who I'm pretty sure is not exclusive to this site, gets into the action a little by putting a finger in various orafices of the models. I'm not sure I like this style and can't tell if the models do either.
The models are for the most part, right out of ALScan or Twisty's. The top models here are on those other sites, too. Generally pretty, with maybe a few that are not. Oh, and the "real factor" is pretty high here. Make-up is minimal. Lot's of very shiny faces and plenty of pimples visible just about everywhere you can imagine. One girl has a boot shaped bruise right across her butt! If you like "real" this is the place for you!
The "acting" is OK. Female orgasms in porn is like watching professional wrestling. Is it real? Who cares! It's entertainment!
The stats, curiously posted across the top on th ehome page to make it really easy for me to reference, are:
Models: 507
Scenes: 640
Videos: 622
Pics: 39,138
That is not a lot of material compared to some other sites and it doesn't take a math wiz to see that over three quarters of the models only have one photo set and one video. The price isn't bad, though, so I would say it is worth it.
Navigation is pretty straightforward. You can sort models alphatically or on popularity...but the order of the models seems to change and the ranking system, wich goes to 5, seems a little narrow and somewhat inaccurate. There are two image download sizes and a handful of video format options. There are also a few page preferences like number of thumnails on a page. I would like to see larger image options and the ability to download things directly from the model or scene summary page.
OK, bottom line: If you are into solo mastubation videos, this site is certainly worth a visit.
I was able to get in after changing my password (for no reason). And I got an email back that said "We see you logged in so everything must be OK now." No mention of the fact that my password was changed without my knowledge and I was charged for but didn't log in for 2 months because I thought the account had expired...the usual case when you can't log in using known-good account credentials. But they are in the business of taking my money, so they did, and technically don't have give any back for any reason, so they didn't.
Part of the problem is that the more obscure billing services, like the one that Diesel uses, Vendo Services, aren't on my checklist to review monthly like ccbill and epoch are. At least they send emails, though. One, ECHST, doesn't even send you a confirmation email when you sign up to a site they service or a cancellation when you cancel so you have no record at all of the charge other than the cryptic information on the credit card bill and no proof that a cancellation was processed.
I need to remember to include the billing service in my reviews...
Has anyone else had access issues over the last few months? My original username/password stopped working for no apparent reason and I had to go through the process to create a new, random password to get back in. I'm back in, but am curious to see if others had issues.
I'm looking at the previews to these two sites (wowgirls.com and 18onlygirls.com) and the images and videos are almost exactly the same, but they do not appear to be part of a network. Anyone have any info about that?
Nice review. Still trying to figure out how they decide something goes to WowGirls or WowPorn. Much of the content seems completely interchangeable.
Also, just FYI, in Met Art and a growing number of site on their network, there is an "options" link in the upper right hand corner on the main page that allows you to personalize you preferences. One of the options to sets whether or not images open on separate pages. Personally, I like the "open images in new tab" option, although it can create a lot of tabs of the images are really good. :-)
Easy enough to turn it off, though.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many popular, young, good looking porn stars and models (180+)
Exclusive, excellent quality videos
Wide vartiety of settings and scenarios.
Good Navigation.
Decent search functions.
Good download speeds.
Video downloads come in 8 sizes and newer vids are in 4k.
Very good separation of the types of videos here into 4 groups.
Erotica-X features sensual sex videos that are perfect for watching with your partner.
All videos are dated.
Cons:
Not much in the con department:
Photo sets seem like afterthoughts.
Photos are only in one size. (1920x1280).
No zip files.
No keyword search.
Only one update a week, on average.
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying this is a quality site with a lot of great material from some of the best looking female porn stars in the industry. Although the site is billed as a network, it is one well integrated site with material broken down in to 4 categories: Hard-X, Erotica-X, Dark-X and Lesbian-X. These categories are fairly self explanatory, and they do a surprisingly good job of separating Erotica-X, which is mostly straight couples or threesome sex in more sensual situations (stuff you might watch with your girlfriend), with hard-X, which includes anal, DP, some huge dicks in some really small girls (i.e. Piper Perri) and generally more active and aggresive physical sex. Lesbian-X is all about the ladies pleasuring themselves and each other and ranges from solo stuff to some serious jamming and it includes some peeing and other stuff.
This site is pretty large. I count 1120 videos in all categories, about 578 of which are Hard-X, 85 are Lesbian-X , 274 are Erotica-X and 168 are Black-X. There are 200 female porn-stars listed and no male stars listed in the directory although they are listed on individual video page. Videos date back to 2013 and there is one new release a week.
I mentioned that Erotica-X is a really excellent collection of videos to watch with your wife, girlfriend or partner. I say this because they are well done videos, sensual, gentle, caring, very respectful of the women in the scenes (no throttling, rough sex, abuse of any kind). There are a few girl-girl scenes in Erotica-X, but they are really gentle compared to the fuck-fest in Lesbian-X. If you enjoy watching nice sensual sex with your partner, this is probably a really good place to find it.
Site layout and navigation are good. Models are listed, searchable and cross-referenced on each-video page. That goes for male models also (except for some gang-bang and gang-blowjob scenes where the male models are not listed). If you like a model, click on her name and all of the vids for her/him appear. You can create a playlist and you can add models, female or male, to your favorites. There is a thumbs-up/thumbs-down ranking for each video so you can see how they rate on their page, but there is no scoring or ranking system and there are no keyword options, although there are some "categories" on each video page that lists things like Hardcore, Facial, Fingering, Brunette, Blowjob, Anal, Tittyfuck, Big Tits, Pussy Licking, etc. This is a single threaded site, so if you want multiple windows, you have to use your keyboard.
I have to say that most of the sets, lighting, video and, of course, the actresses are beautiful. Somebody put a lot of thought into making sure that you aren't distracted by too much BS in video. The women have no or very few tattoos and, thank god, so do the men (I don't mind really well done tattoos, but some male pornstars on other sites are literally covered with them and that is really distracting. Not here.) Make-up is nicely done, too.
Probably the only shortcoming has to do with the photo sets included with the videos. Many of the images themselves are excellent, but the way they are provided, managed and named, with no zip file options, makes them difficult to download and keep. A few other sites do a much better job of this.
Bottom line: In an internet seemingly overflowing with high-production-quality porn sites, X-Empire is a pleasant surprise. The overall material may not quite be glam-porn like some other sites, but the material is probably comparable to Vixen or much of the Fantasy-HD network and far better than the run-of-the-mill porn site.
The main reason I didn't score this site higher is because they only release one new video every week or so. That makes it hard to stick around once you join for a month and get a chance to see what you want to see. That said, many sites in this category only release a set or two a week, so I don't think that is a deal killer-by any means. I woudl recommend that you visit this site soon if you haven't been here before and then check back every year or so. I took advantage of the PU discounted rate, and for the discounted rate, this is an excellent deal. Happy viewing!
Thanks for the review! I've never seen this site but from the previews it looks pretty specialized. As I'm sure you know "monster sex" is an odd but growing niche in the animation world so I guess it was only a matter of time before somebody adapted it into this format. There a few other very good cosplay VR sites and one or two pretty good BDSM VR sites, but I have to say this is the first time I've ever seen VR fuck-an-alien porn. Um. Eww. It is also probably worth mentioning that although this is VR, it is not all POV. Anyway, thanks for letting us know about this site!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The girls here are all beautiful, mostly Eastern European and very popular. If you like the Met-Art or FemJoy networks, you will also like this site. The site has evolved a little, though, and is now featuring several porn stars and starlets that you have seen elsewhere. The videos are well done, dedicated videos. The girls are natural, trimmed or shaved, and solid 9s on the combo body-face scale. Every image and every video is high quality, with no older shoots or videos to disappoint. Even the music selection and timing in the videos seems well done.
Cons:
The overall quality of the images and videos seems to have declined slightly, or, at best, is not keeping up with the standards of other sites. The site format has not been updated in a while and seems a little dated. The number of images in each set has dropped and the highest resolution shots are often upscaled rather than converted from raw files. The site also relies heavily on all-white backgrounds, which was a thing a couple of years ago but seems a little tiresome today.
The site is now breaking out the photo sets and the video sets from a shoot, that used to be one release, into multiple releases. This allows the site to effectively cut the number of shoots in half.
Perhaps the biggest shortcoming that this site has is that it only updates once every 2-4 days. With several other sites updating daily, the potential that this site once had to really compete with the top sites has dulled somewhat.
Bottom Line:
This is a well done site. The photographers and videographers do a very good job of focusing on the girls..and I don't just mean keeping them in focus. The sets, lighting and overall environment combine to create excellent imagery. The videos seem pretty genuine and there are some very good videos both of solo girls, couple and girl-girl scenes.
Navigation on the site is good, allowing you to list by update, model names or model rankings. Downloads are fast. Image selection once in a set has changed since my last visit and no longer allows you to select size. Instead, you get a full screen image and a zoom button that allows you to zoom in considerably. Zips are available in several sizes, usually up to 2500x4000 pixels. Videos come in SD, HD and 4K.
The images are all focused, lit and cropped nicely with no odd or distorted angles, giant panoramas or distractions in the images. Perhaps the only personal thing is that there is a slight shortage of images showing the entire model in a natural position (i.e. without the legs or feet cropped). I'm not a foot fetishist, but I do think several complete images of each model once she is undressed would be nice. Also, several of the more recent image sets are very fuzzy at the high resolution, either because of compression, editing, or both.
Overall, this site could easily fit into the Met Art network as a sex-art clone, or in the Femjoy network as a Joymii clone. There are nicely done photo and video sets, beautiful models and the sex is comparable to the sites I mention above. But the dated format, not-quite-top-tier image quality and less frequent updates mean that this site is no longer one of my top picks. It is still a great site and I highly recommend it, though.
OK, that makes sense. Maybe porn is like Chior or drama in high school. If we had known the ratio of straight girls to straight guys in those groups, we almost certainly would have joined in when we had the chance. :-)
Nice review. It reminded me to go back and join again.
OK, got a question. Define Heartcore for me. I am pretty sure I understand what it is and have been looking for a definition for the style, but I can't actually find one for the context.
Ah. My bad. I read X-Art and thought MetArtX. I wrote an X-art review back in 2012 and haven't been a member since 2015, so it looks like it is time to rejoin! Sinc X-Art and Colette are part of the same group, it is entirely possible that some of the sets are duplicates.
I'm a current member of TMW and, again, you are absolutely correct. I'm not sure where I was looking but I must have been confusing it with something else I had open at the time....or I was having a stroke. It was only 9:00 so alcohol or sleep deprivation could not have been the culprits.
Thanks for the response and for the corrections. All good!
Looking around a little more, I do see a few common models on Colette and Met Art. Heck, I just found Leah Gotti on Met Art from 2015 (disappointing sets of her, though, considering she has quickly become a really popular, full blown, do everything porn star now...interracial 5 guy gang bang on Colette? I'm more crushed than curious.) But I am still sure they are not sharing material. I may join Colette since it looks interesting and I haven't before.
Easiest way to figure this out is to look up model names at indexxx.com
I am 99.9% sure that the material at Met Art X exclusive. It is not the same stuff at Colette and TMW. MetartX uses many of the same European models as Met Art and, with the possible exception of Nancy, I have seen none of these models at TMW. TMW is primarily US porn models. I have not been a member of Colette, but it looks like those are mostly US porn models also. If you look at the model listing and check names against Indexxx, you will see that these TMW/Colette girls might be at ALSScan, but I didn't see any at MetArt or MetArtX. There are a few models that might be at both, but it isn't the same material. Now...I do see a couple of lesser Met Art models at WTF, but that is not too surprising since WTF is a European site that collects material from all over. I have never seen any authorized Met Art network material on any sites outside of their network, so I am pretty sure that it isn't the same material there, either.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The girls here are all absolutely beautiful. If you like Met-Art or FemJoy, you will also really like this site. Although many of the same girls are here, most of them seem a little less inhibited and this is the only place I've seen were so many of them agreed to do sex scenes. Most sets include both images and videos (listed separately under each model's profile) and the videos are not just video of the photo session, they are all well done, dedicated videos. Both images and videos are some of the best quality I have seen on any site. The girls are natural, trimmed or shaved, and solid 9s on the combo body-face scale. Every image and every video is high quality, with no older shoots or videos to dissappoint. Even the music selection and timing in the videos seems well done.
Cons:
Well...yes, there could be a little more content. The site, it seems, has only been around since 2008 or so. But in the balance between really good imagery and volume, I'm pretty happy here. I couldn't find a single set or even an image in a set that was just added to create filler. Quality beats quantity every time in this case. For the money, the site is well worth it.
Bottom Line:
This is a VERY well done site. The photographers and videographers do a spectacular job of focusing on the girls..and I don't just mean keeping them in focus. The sets, lighting and overall environment combine to create exceptional imagery. The videos seem pretty genuine and there are some really excellent videos both of solo girls, couple and girl-girl scenes. They've managed to tap every single exceptional European and American model. Go look at the model list and you may recognize many of the girls. Most are among the most beautiful in the industry. And, as I said, the crew here brings out the best in them...in every single set. Several of the models look far, far better than I've ever seen them on other sites. Perhaps it is, judging from the fact that many of the sets are in the sun or on an island someplace, that it seems these folks have a decent budget and can afford to take the models someplace really fun for the shoots.
Navigation on the site is good, allowing you to list by update, model names or model rankings. Downloads are fast. Image selection once in a set is good. Select the image size you want, click on the images tab and then any image you click on will open in the size selcted. You can then choose larger or smaller from within each image page (nice feature). Zips are available in several sizes, usually up to 2500x4000 pixels.
The images are all focused, lit and cropped nicely with no odd or distorted angles, giant panoramas or distractions in the images. Perhaps the only personal thing is that there is a slight shortage of images showing the entire model in a natural position (i.e. without the legs or feet cropped). I'm not a foot fetishist, but I do think several complete images of each model once she is undressed would be nice.
If you have been to to the top-tier photography sites like Femjoy, Met-art, Met-Models, Errotica-Archive, Earl Miller, Ron Harris, etc., then you owe it to yourself to check out X-art. If it isn't among the top-tier sites now, I sincerely believe it should and will be soon.
Thanks for the response. It means a lot when a representative from the site responds.
From what I can see, your VR videos are well done. It looks like your intended audience is lesbian (as opposed to a girl-only "view" site like In-The-Crack), correct? I think it would probably clear things up a lot if you just come out and say that. Nothing wrong with that at all. Call it Sapphic VR. You will still get a lot of men and it will be clear that it is girls only sex. (Of course, I'm a guy and I'm pretty dense so it wasn't obvious to me when I made my first comment.)
When it comes to straight sex, I truly believe that using VR to shoot strictly observational scenes is not the most effective use of the medium. You shouldn't shoot a VR of a roller coaster from the ground, you don't create a VR game in the third person, you shouldn't shoot a VR car demo from the street watching the car go by and you shouldn't shoot straight porn VR sex from a chair next to the bed.
That said, I understand that it is incredibly difficult to do sapphic sex in participatory VR because there is no common position or orientation to shoot from. There are a few non-VR POV sites that do it pretty well, but I'm sure there is less gear involved and the actors are often pros. In your case, it would probably interfere with the genuine lovemaking that you are striving for. Your girls are not pros so working around and staying close to a fixed rig would certainly have an adverse impact on your videos. I can appreciate all of that.
As for the price, yes, 30 videos is just about average or maybe just shy of average. If you look at my review history here, you will see that I've joined nearly every VR porn site out there and am constantly joining more. The price for your site is 30-50% higher than any other VR site out there, even the ones that are approaching or exceeding 100 videos and are part of a large mixed network. But I understand. You've got a budget. You've got expenses. You have to determine how to stay solvent, what the market will bear and what your unique niche will support.
Rather than reducing your price universally, may I suggest reaching out to the folks at The Best Porn and working out a discount deal? It will almost certainly get you positive reviews and will help make your site a bigger blip on the VR map while limiting the discount to the most savvy viewers. Please consider that.
I applaud your efforts and truly hope you succeed.
I was about to join this site when I realized this is an all-girls site that offers scenes where you observe masturbation or non-participatory lesbian sex only. Although that might be great for some, the whole idea behind VR is that it can be a visually participatory experience. For this site, apparently, you get to watch in VR. Also, $39.95 a month is pretty pricey for any site but waaaay up there for a small VR site. As a straight guy looking for VR sex, I don't think I'm the audience they are looking for.
I just joined this site a few days ago and so far, it isn't bad at all. It is an "Art" or "Nude" site, mostly what I call "Girl in the woods" stuff, but many of the models are exclusive. The non-exclusive models are top-tier (perhaps from before they were mainstream), and all of the models are, for the most part, absolutley flawless.
I definitely see the granularity, mentioned elsewhere in feedback, in many of the larger images, even brand new posts. This leads me to believe that the host is drawing on older images that are previously unreleased..or he just doesn't want anybody zooming in or printing razor sharp, life-sized images of the models and thinks the grainy look is artsy. (Remember when the images in Penthouse Magazine had that odd glow/fuzz effect?) It's distracting but not terminal.
I'll do a full review in a few days once I 've had a chance to look around.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
