| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Heh heh oh Greymane you are such a sweet guy! I was only teasing - I don't mind at all! You phrase your questions however you like, I just specify what I mean when I vote is all.
The vast majority of users of this site are heterosexual males, I know that.
I don't go in for all this over-sensitivity and political correctness. I know when someone is trying to deliberately exclude or offend me and you could never do that!
|
08-07-13 09:23am
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Well I'd be ecstatic, but only if they had been worn so I had to choose "accept only if worn".
Otherwise if it's a new pair, they weren't really the porn star's in any meaningful sense, were they?
Incidentally if a porn star I was fond of was wearing panties I'd probably be put off him! But I chose to read "panties" as "jocks"!
|
08-07-13 02:41am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I put very important, because I like fantasy scenes and for there to be a build-up before the sex.
|
08-05-13 02:50am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Reply
I expect it'll keep growing if you keep joining that many porn sites!
|
08-01-13 01:18pm
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Just one at the moment, but plan to join a couple more soon and get writing some reviews which I've neglected for too long!
|
08-01-13 01:15pm
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I love it, but like was the strongest option I could pick!
I have a slight fetish for condoms and I wish they'd show the guy putting them on, which they almost never do. You see the cock uncovered before and after, and most porn gives you the "money shot" - cumming inside the person being fucked is rare in porn - so the condom is removed for that too.
Even without that fetish though I've never understood why straight guys object to this and why condoms are virtually never seen in straight porn. The focus is supposed to be on the woman, no? Why would it bother you to see the penis a little covered up?
Ultimately it's good to know the models are protected too.
|
07-30-13 12:18am
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes always - my browser is set to update itself automatically anyway, and I am sure Windows Media Player does as part of Windows updates too.
|
07-26-13 02:07am
|
Reply
83
|
Purzel Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
jeppegutt's Comment
HATE streaming-only more than anything else!
Why pay for that when for the same money other sites let you keep the stuff?
Streaming-only sites are like a store that charges you the same to rent a DVD as to buy it!
|
07-23-13 09:09am
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
I assume squirting doesn't refer to the kind of squirting guys do that I love in the context of this poll!
I don't mind a little watersports occasionally for variety, though it's not a huge thing for me - so I picked "watersports only".
|
07-22-13 10:31am
|
Comment
85
|
DILF
(0)
|
|
07-22-13 10:28am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
86
|
CFNM College
(0)
|
|
07-21-13 10:55am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
87
|
Absolute Cruelty
(0)
|
|
07-21-13 10:53am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
88
|
Paul Raymond.xxx
(0)
|
Reply of
ptwreviews's Comment
That seems unusual for a well-known site listed on PU so it's very concerning. Have you contacted the biller directly? They should help if the site won't and you can at least get a refund.
|
07-21-13 10:49am
|
Comment
89
|
Breeder Fuckers
(0)
|
|
07-21-13 10:44am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Hell no! I can see hot guys in clothes anywhere - clothing catalogues, magazines, the internet - the street! Why would I pay?!
|
07-19-13 04:34am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yep, pretty much all the time.
|
07-06-13 08:45am
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Almost all online now, but I do buy the very occasional DVD, if it's on sale or maybe has a movie not available to own online.
It's funny because I won't do it with regular movies or TV shows, where it's DVD all the way for me, but I will for porn.
I still have hundreds of old DVDs and even videotapes I can't bear to part with though!
|
07-05-13 07:42am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I find PU reviews the most helpful when written by one of the better contributors - somehow amateur reviews just seem able to give me a better "feel" for how the site really is than professional reviewers.
TBP site facts are very useful of course but I tend not to find their reviews quite as helpful somehow.
Previews are useful too, but you need reviews to let you know how accurate the previews are and exactly what you're getting, with any hidden traps or downsides previews will never tell you!
|
06-30-13 03:35pm
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I put slightly but I suspect the novelty would soon wear off. I haven't been very impressed with 3D movies in the cinema lately - they don't seem as impressive as I expected them to be somehow, and the glasses are a pain in the rear.
|
06-29-13 03:42am
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I try and cancel immediately as most sites auto-renew every month and a month is usually enough for me even for the best sites - I'll then re-subscribe a few months later when they have new content.
Occasionally I put it off a while though and a few times I've missed the date and wound up being auto-renewed - slightly annoying but just one of those things.
I hate auto-renew but I can't do much about it since boycotting sites which use it would mean boycotting 99% of sites and I'm not willing to do that, so it's an pain in the ass I have to live with!
|
06-29-13 03:38am
|
Reply
96
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Nothing I need unless something breaks!
|
06-21-13 03:32pm
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I don't really understand this poll. I know the phrase but I can't recall it in any advertising?
|
06-06-13 03:53pm
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Hmmm interesting poll but I picked "other" because I'm not sure any of the other options are correct, at least not for everybody.
Personally I do not understand the whole straight men watching lesbian porn thing, but it seems undeniably popular with many and just because I don't get it doesn't mean it's wrong. I can't see any harm in it. It's a sort of standing joke that "lesbian" sex made for a straight male audience isn't a realistic potrayal of how real lesbians have sex, but so what? I wouldn't expect it to be.
I do know of some women who watch gay male porn but it's not really an issue as they seem happy to watch porn designed with gay men in mind and I haven't seen their custom change gay porn in any way, so it doesn't bother anyone.
Clearly heterosexual men aren't going to want to watch gay men having sex, and even if they found it unpleasant to watch that doesn't make them homophobic.
The fact is that the vast bulk of porn is aimed at heterosexual men. What heterosexual porn that there is aimed at heterosexual women would not include lesbian scenes.
Some straight men are clearly not into lesbian scenes, so I guess it's best for them to boycott any movies with it in and make it clear there is a market for non-lesbian porn aimed at them, but I am sure there must be lots of stuff out there without lesbian scenes?
Bottom line - porn producers make what sells - lesbian scenes are popular and they sell, it's simple and no need to make a big deal out of it or worry about homophobia. It's creating problems where none exist.
|
06-05-13 02:50pm
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes I've done several - the majority were sorted out quickly, though one or two seemed to cause a little confusion. Always got there in the end though!
|
06-02-13 03:38pm
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
"Frequent" is quite a specific and strong word, so I'd say an absolute minimum of three times a week.
I agree with Jay G that once a week seems pretty standard, so twice a week is great but still not enough to be called "frequent" in my book.
|
05-29-13 05:39am
|
